Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

A Simple Circuit Model for the Collapse Effect

Submitted:

12 March 2025

Posted:

13 March 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Simple quantum circuits are presented demonstrating how information loss triggers the collapse effect.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Loss of which-way information has recently been shown to trigger the collapse effect in a unitary universe [1]. Meanwhile a technique has been developed for modeling observation processes using quantum circuits [2]. The purpose of this note is to demonstrate the collapse effect using the circuit technique.

2. The Experiment

Imagine a spin is prepared aligned along the x axis, either + x or x . It is then measured along the z-axis. The result is written to a classical bit which the experimenter does not examine. Regardless of which result occurs, it will be impossible for the experimenter to determine which state ( ± x ) was originally prepared.
We can perform this experiment today using a quantum computer. Physical qbits may be trapped ions or Josephson junctions, but the principle is the same. The circuit is shown in Figure 11. We ask the reader to imagine the measurement apparatus places the classical result on the same physical qbit implementation which was identified as the system, a quintessentially projective measurement. If the experimenter does not look at the bit, it will be in a mixed state
ρ = ( | | + | | ) / 2 .
The usual interpretation is that it is in one of the two states with equal probability. The coherence between the alternatives has been lost and there is no experiment that can be performed on the classical bit to determine which way it was prepared.
In Figure 2, the measurement gate is replaced by a CNOT gate connecting the system qbit to an ancillary qbit. This represents loss of information. We assume the loss is irreversible for some reason. We represent an irreversible loss with a vertical bar at the end of the qbit line. When part of an entangled state is lost, the state of the remaining part can be described by a partial trace over the decoupled Hilbert space2. The result is
ρ = ( | | + | | ) / 2 .
This is the exact same state as 1. No experiment is possible that can distinguish these states. The unitary evolution of Figure 2 is indistinguishable from the non-unitary evolution of Figure 1.
For observations in the macroscopic world, the loss of information is due to interaction with the environment [4], which is necessary in order to display a result on a macroscopic meter. In that case it is unrecoverable as a practical matter. But we can consider that an ancillary spin particle is isolated somehow by the experimenter, or is lost to outer space.
Suppose in the latter case the experimenter examines the system qbit and records the result. Later an alien captures the ancillary spin, measures it, and sends the result back to earth. The results will match, as is well known from EPR.
Suppose instead the experimenter preserves the system qbit. Later the alien captures the ancillary spin and brings it back to earth (or the experimenter retrieves it from isolation). If that occurs, it is possible to allow it to interact with the system qbit, recover coherence, and find out which spin state was originally prepared. This is shown in Figure 3.

3. Conclusions

Quantum collapse is exactly mimicked by loss of which-way information. All human measurements involve loss of which-way information because human sense organs exist in a thermal environment. Collapse is irreversible only if the lost information is irrecoverable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ring, D. Quantum Collapse in an Isolated Laboratory. Preprints 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ring, D. A Consistent Approach to Modeling Quantum Observers. Preprints 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ring, D. Partial Trace Reduction Without the Born Rule. Preprints 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Schlosshauer, M. Quantum decoherence. Physics Reports 2019, 831, 1–57, Quantum decoherence. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
1
All figures in this paper were produced and simulated using Quirk: https://algassert.com/quirk
2
The proof does not depend on the Born rule [3]
Figure 1. A simple measurement in a quantum computer. In this figure the spin is prepared aligned along the x axis. It is found to point along the + z or z axis with probability 1 / 2 .
Figure 1. A simple measurement in a quantum computer. In this figure the spin is prepared aligned along the x axis. It is found to point along the + z or z axis with probability 1 / 2 .
Preprints 152165 g001
Figure 2. Loss of information. If which-way information is lost, the system will be left in an incoherent state, exactly mimicking the measurement bit from Figure 1.
Figure 2. Loss of information. If which-way information is lost, the system will be left in an incoherent state, exactly mimicking the measurement bit from Figure 1.
Preprints 152165 g002
Figure 3. Collapse reversal. The ancillary qbit is recovered. It interacts with the system qbit restoring coherence and allowing the experimenter to determine how the system spin was prepared, in this case along the + x axis.
Figure 3. Collapse reversal. The ancillary qbit is recovered. It interacts with the system qbit restoring coherence and allowing the experimenter to determine how the system spin was prepared, in this case along the + x axis.
Preprints 152165 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated