Real-World Data Confirm That the Integration of Deuterium Depletion into Conventional Cancer Therapy Multiplies the Survival Probability of Patients

Gábor Somlyai; Ildikó Somlyai; Beáta Zs. Kovács; András Papp; Mária Debrődi

doi:10.20944/preprints202503.0500.v1

Submitted:

06 March 2025

Posted:

07 March 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Over thirty years of basic research has demonstrated that the deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio plays a pivotal role in regulating metabolism and cell growth; via a sub-molecular regulatory system that orchestrates the intricate complexity of life in eukaryotic organisms. Deuterium depletion, achieved through deuterium-depleted water (DDW), has shown anticancer effects in vitro, in vivo, and in phase 2 prospective and retrospective clinical studies.METHODS: In this population-based observational study, 2,649 cancer patients undergoing conventional therapy and consuming DDW were included between October 1992 and October 2024. With various cancer types and stages and conventional therapies received, they are representing a broad spectrum of the Hungarian cancer population. Survival was selected as the primary endpoint, and median survival time (MST) of these patients and various subgroups was calculated and compared to the overall Hungarian cancer population's MST of 2.4 years.RESULTS: For the entire study population, MST from diagnosis was 12.4 years (95% CI: 9.8–14.9), and from the initiation of DDW treatment, 7.6 years (95% CI: 5.9–9.3). A statistically significant correlation was observed between the duration of DDW treatment and survival, both from the time of diagnosis (Pearson’s coefficient: r = 0.476, p <0.001) and from the start of DDW treatment (r = 0.635, p <0.001). The analysis also showed that the duration of DDW consumption and the time gap from the diagnosis crucially influence the outcome. Excluding patients who died within 120 days of initiating DDW treatment, those who consumed DDW for less than 120 days, and those who began DDW treatment later than 9 months of diagnosis (1,243 patients), the MST from the start of DDW consumption increased from 7.6 years to 11.6 years (95% CI: 8.9–14.2).CONCLUSION: Utilizing DDW enables targeted intervention in the sub-molecular regulatory system, paving the way for innovative therapeutic applications and a more profound understanding of cellular processes. Integrating deuterium depletion into conventional cancer therapies has the potential to significantly enhance survival rates and reduce cancer-related mortality by 75–80%.

Keywords:

deuterium

;

deuterium-depleted water

;

cancer

;

drug

;

sub-molecular

;

median survival time

Subject:

Biology and Life Sciences - Biology and Biotechnology

Introduction

Malignant neoplasms are among the leading causes of death worldwide. In individuals aged 45 to 64 years, cancers cause the majority of lethalities[1]. In Europe, there were about 2.74 million new cases[2] in 2022 and 1.1 million cancer-related deaths in 2021.[3] The United States also faced a staggering 1.9 million new cancer diagnoses and over 600,000 cancer-related deaths.[4,5] In 2021, Hungary reported approximately 70,000 new cancer cases and 33,000 deaths attributed to cancer.[6] A recent study projected for men a rise globally in the number of cancer cases from 10.3 million in 2022 to 19 million by 2050 (> 84% increase). Deaths are expected to increase from 5.4 million to 10.5 million (>93% increase), with a more than twofold rise (>117%) projected among men aged 65 and older.[7]

Despite the dedicated efforts of scientists and the pharmaceutical industry to develop safer and more effective cancer treatments, the global impact remains limited. Between 2000 and 2016, the FDA approved 92 novel cancer drugs for 100 indications based on 127 clinical trials. However, these drugs’ median absolute survival benefit was only 2.4 months.[8] This stark reality underscores the need for transformative advancements in cancer research and treatment. It prompts a critical reassessment of the current strategy, mainly the decades-long focus on identifying new mutations and targeting elements of signaling pathways. While this approach has dominated cancer research for over 40 years, its overall efficacy in overcoming the disease is now being questioned. The challenge of cancer remains profound, and a definitive solution is yet to be found.

Recently, two comprehensive review papers summarized the outcomes of three decades of research on deuterium (D) and deuterium-depleted water (DDW).[9,10] These studies—initiated by a pioneering research published in 1993 that first demonstrated the cell growth inhibiting effect of DDW and proved to be a significant milestone in exploring alternative cancer therapies[11]—confirmed the anticancer effects of deuterium depletion through multiple independent experiments, elucidating the underlying mechanisms and introducing a novel concept and target for cancer drug development. It has been demonstrated that replacing regular water (of 16 mmol/L D concentration, equivalent to 150 ppm, as found in natural waters) with deuterium-depleted water (3.2 mmol/L D concentration, equivalent to 30 ppm) inhibits cell growth in vitro and leads to complete tumor regression in vivo. Conversely, research has also shown that deuterium-enriched water, containing deuterium in 2-4-fold concentrations above natural levels (300–600 ppm), stimulated cell growth.

These findings, combined with earlier results[12-14] indicating a correlation between increased intracellular pH and cell division, suggest a critical role for the Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger in this process. It was supposed that the exchanger, sitting in the cell membrane and activated when a growth hormone binds to its receptors, preferentially transfers the lighter hydrogen isotope (protium), leading to an increased intracellular deuterium-to-hydrogen (D/H) ratio. Yeast ATPase was shown to prefer only hydrogen (not deuterium) as a substrate in proton transfer[15] and in fibroblasts expressing yeast ATPase in their membrane, tumorigenicity, and increased intracellular pH was observed.[14] This D/H ratio is proposed to act as a key sub-molecular signal for initiating cell growth which is supported by the data that deuterium-enriched media stimulated cell growth.11 Since Warburg’s discovery[16] it has been well established that a hallmark of most cancer cells is their reliance on anaerobic metabolism, even in the presence of oxygen.[16,17] It has been hypothesized that properly functioning mitochondria in healthy cells produce deuterium-depleted metabolic water, which inhibits cell growth by counteracting the increase of the D/H ratio caused by activation of the Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger. When food is metabolized into water and carbon dioxide, the resulting metabolic water is deuterium-depleted, with a degree of depletion depending on the composition of the food. This hypothesis is supported by the dissimilar D concentrations of macronutrients: in proteins 135 ppm, slightly reduced vs. natural waters, significantly reduced, 109 to 118 ppm, in lipids; but about 150 ppm in carbohydrates.[18] This metabolic water thus helps maintain a lower D/H ratio, acting as a regulatory mechanism to reduce the likelihood of reaching the threshold D/H ratio required to trigger cell growth. Supporting this hypothesis, recent experiments demonstrated that feeding tumor-bearing mice with deuterium-depleted yolk[18] but with normal water extended their survival, underlining the critical role of mitochondrial activity in controlling the D/H ratio and inhibiting tumor progression. Consequently, in line with Warburg’s idea cancer cells’ uncontrolled growth characteristic likely arises from the inability of their mitochondria to generate deuterium-depleted metabolic water as a consequence of a defunct tricarboxylic acid cycle.[16]

Evidence on the anticancer potential of deuterium depletion in humans has been obtained in a prospective phase 2 clinical trial involving prostate cancer patients[19] and retrospective studies on lung[20], breast cancer[21], and glioblastoma.[22] These studies, conducted on well-defined and homogeneous cancer populations in terms of cancer type and stage, revealed that when patients consumed DDW alongside conventional therapy, MST, depending on cancer type, increased three- to seven-fold compared to the historical control. These findings underscore the therapeutic promise of deuterium depletion, positioning it as a groundbreaking mechanism and a promising direction for future cancer research and treatment development.

Cancer drug registration requires conducting prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials. However, the small sample sizes in clinical trials often limit the reliability of the results and conclusions, as they may not accurately reflect the true efficacy and safety of the investigated drug candidates. To address this limitation, collecting and analyzing real-world data is essential for a comprehensive understanding of a drug’s performance, ultimately enabling a more accurate evaluation of its efficacy in cancer treatment.[23]

Given DDW’s demonstrated safety[19] and the absence of any dietary requirement for deuterium, drinking water with reduced deuterium content was introduced as a commercial food product in 1994 with approval from the Hungarian food safety organizations. This marked a significant step forward in making DDW accessible for broader use.

Patients consuming DDW voluntarily shared their experiences and outcomes before, during, and after DDW consumption, along with the results of follow-up oncology examination confirming the effectiveness of conventional treatments. This valuable feedback was collected by HYD LLC, and was processed in a comprehensive analysis across various tumor types, the published findings of which contributed to the growing body of evidence supporting DDW’s therapeutic potential.

In 32 years, reliable data have been collected on 2,649 patients (the first enrolled patient started to consume DDW in October 1992, and the last one, in October 2024), forming an ample set of real-world data, the foundation of the present publication. In this study, we focus on data of survival, the primary common descriptor of treatment outcome of any malignant disease.

Evaluation of the fate of cancer patients with and without DDW consumption required a reliable base of comparison. The 2023 Country Cancer Profile: Hungary report by the European Cancer Inequalities Registry was the foundation for conclusions that were subsequently compared with our data and findings. This comparison provided valuable context and insights into Hungary’s broader landscape of cancer care and outcomes.⁶

Methods

Patients

The evaluated cancer population encompasses a diverse range of malignancies, including various organs of origin, distinct pathological backgrounds, different stages, and diverse treatment protocols. The final database included 2,649 patients (Figure 1), comprising 43.67% males (1,157) and 56.33% females (1,492). The average age of the overall population was 55.63 years (median: 58 years). Among males, the average age was 56.3 years (median: 60 years), while for females, it was 55.1 years (median: 56 years). The average body weight across the population was 69.6 kg (median: 70), with males averaging 76.1 kg (median: 76 kg) and females averaging 64.7 kg (median: 64 kg).

DDW Production and Its Application for Human Use

Deuterium-depleted water was produced from ordinary water containing the natural concentration of deuterium (150 ppm, equivalent to 16.8 mmol/L). Fractional distillation was employed to reduce the deuterium (D) concentration to 50–25 ppm. This method is based on the differences in the physical properties of normal water (H₂O) and heavy water (D₂O)—specifically, that, in equilibrium with liquid water, steam at the boiling point of normal water contains approximately 2.5% less deuterium. The deuterium content of water was progressively reduced through repeated evaporation, which was performed on an industrial scale in distillation towers, and the distillate was measured. The instrument (Liquid-Water Isotope Analyzer-24d, manufactured by Los Gatos Research Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) uses off-axis integrated cavity output spectroscopy to measure the absolute abundances of D-containing water molecules via laser absorption. The deuterium concentration is given in ppm (with ±1ppm accuracy as stated by the manufacturer).

To prepare the final products (that is, the drinking waters Preventa 125, 105, 85, 65, 45, and 25), DDW was mixed with high-quality spring water to set the required D concentration and replenish minerals removed during distillation. For the latter purpose, a mineral stock solution was also used.

DDW is now commercially available under different brand names in several countries, including the United States of America, Russia, China, Japan, Romania, and Hungary. The production and sales of DDW have been steadily growing worldwide, reaching a yearly amount of approx. 600 tons by 2024.

To maximize the potential efficacy of DDW, patients are advised to consume it exclusively, at a rate of 1.5–2 liters per day, depending on an average body weight of 60–80 kg. For individuals weighing over 80 kg, daily DDW intake should exceed 2 liters. The quantity of DDW consumed should account for 75–80% of the total daily fluid intake, while the remaining 20–25% is expected to come from the water content in food. The optimal D concentration and the duration of consumption depend on various factors, including the type of cancer, its stage, and any ongoing conventional therapy. Generally, it is advisable to begin DDW consumption at either 105 ppm or 85 ppm, as these levels were found to be necessary for efficacy²¹. The primary concept behind DDW administration is to achieve a gradual, sustained reduction in the body’s deuterium levels over time, thereby challenging the metabolism of all cancer and healthy cells. To facilitate this, the DDW being consumed should be progressively replaced with another one with 20 ppm lower D concentration than the previous level. The recommended duration for consuming DDW with a specific concentration is typically 2–3 months. However, this can vary depending on factors such as the type of conventional therapy, cancer localization, pathology, and the individual’s response to conventional treatment and DDW consumption.[24]

Integration of DDW into Conventional Therapies

The use of DDW is not classified as a treatment. Our study was designed to collect data from cancer patients undergoing conventional therapies such as chemotherapy, targeted drug therapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, or surgery while consuming DDW. The oncologists’ treatment protocols remained untouched and no extra patient examinations were conducted. Instead, the information generated during the participating patients’ conventional therapies was provided voluntarily to HYD LLC, which collected and processed it and gave advice to DDW consumption based on the patients’ medical history and the results of follow-up examinations.

A set of detailed protocols was developed for patients suffering from various malignancies in different stages based on insights from over 30 years of follow-up studies. These are specified in the book Deuterium Depletion—A New Way in Curing Cancer and Preserving Health.²⁴ Studies, including a landmark article on lung cancer, further support the value/usefulness of these protocols, underscoring the benefits of DDW consumption.²⁰

Evaluation of Provided Data of the DDW-Consuming Cancer Patients

This population-based observational retrospective study evaluates the data accumulated over 32 years (the first patient was enrolled on October 29^th, 1992, and the last one on October 18^th, 2024). All patients enrolled in the study were diagnosed with cancer, and while receiving conventional therapy, they also consumed DDW in parallel, as stated above. As previously explained, DDW consumption was the only difference from the overall Hungarian cancer population used as the comparison base. The evaluated patient population was highly heterogeneous regarding tumor types, stages, conventional therapies received, and the duration of DDW consumption. Given this variability, the evaluation of survival data was chosen as the study’s primary endpoint; that is, the survival times of the DDW-consuming patients were compared to the historical control described in the next section to draw meaningful conclusions.

On the participants the following information was available: pseudonymization code, gender, age at the start of DDW consumption, body weight, primary cancer localization, date of diagnosis, date of DDW initiation, staging at the beginning of DDW consumption (remission or active tumor presence), date of DDW consumption ended, date of the last recorded information, and the patient’s status (alive or deceased) at that time. The medical history of patients with DDW consumption was divided, according to the above-mentioned data, into three primary phases, with two additional phases calculated from these (Figure 2).

Time from Diagnosis to the Start of DDW Consumption: The period between the initial diagnosis and the beginning of DDW treatment.
Duration of DDW Consumption: The total time the patient consumed DDW.
Follow-Up Time After Stopping DDW Consumption: The duration from the cessation of DDW consumption to the end of the follow-up period.
Total Time from Diagnosis to the End of Follow-Up: The combined time spanning from diagnosis to the conclusion of follow-up.
Time from the Start of DDW Consumption to the End of Follow-Up: The interval from the initiation of DDW treatment to the end of the follow-up period.

The Base of Comparison: Cancer Mortality and Estimated Median Survival Time in the Us, Europe and Hungary

The general population’s MST from cancer is approximately 2.7–3 years in the United States and Europe, estimated from the number of new cancer cases and the cancer-caused deaths every year. In Hungary, cancer-related mortality was 33% higher than the EU average in 2019.[3] Cancers such as colorectal, lung, pancreatic, and stomach account for 52% of all cancer-related deaths in Hungary. These cancers, except colorectal, typically have an MST of just over one year or less[6]. Consequently, Hungary’s overall cancer MST is estimated to be lower than the European average, around 2.4 years.

Accordingly, the 2.4-year MST is considered as historical control for this analysis, against which data from the DDW-consuming population will be compared.

Endpoints and Assessment

Given the heterogeneity of the enrolled population, survival was selected as the primary endpoint for assessing the efficacy of deuterium depletion. Earlier studies conducted on small, homogeneous cancer subpopulations demonstrated several key findings: prolonged DDW consumption correlated with extended survival, lower deuterium concentrations of DDW were associated with higher response rates, particularly in breast cancer patients[21], and different tumor types exhibited varying degrees of sensitivity to deuterium depletion, as observed in lung cancer[20,25] and glioblastoma multiforme.[22] These studies, importantly, also proved the validity of the available data and the analysis method. The current study will expand the evaluation to include the entire population, but to ensure robustness and validation, analyses will also focus on specific subgroups. This approach is expected to provide a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between deuterium depletion and cancer progression/regression and to evaluate the potential of integrating deuterium depletion into conventional therapy.

Study Oversight

This study is a population-based observational retrospective analysis based on data collected over 32 years by HYD LLC. Patients consuming deuterium-depleted drinking water (marketed under the brand name Preventa^®) already available on the market voluntarily shared their experiences and the results of their follow-up examinations. All patients received standard oncological treatments according to established protocols, and no intervention was made beyond monitoring their DDW consumption.

The data evaluation process involved collaboration with experienced statisticians and leading oncologists to ensure a thorough and validated analysis and interpretation of the results.

Statistical Analysis

The primary endpoint of the study was survival. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and a log-rank test were used to compare groups. The statistical analysis compared the MST value of the 2,649 patients with the historical control data, calculated at 2.4 years. A detailed analysis of the underlying factors behind the given MST value was conducted to minimize the likelihood of potential errors. We examined the factors influencing MST and analyzed and investigated the relationship and interaction between multiple factors. The data in Table 2 indicates that the average time from diagnosis to the commencement of DDW consumption was 19 months. To accurately assess the efficacy of DDW consumption, the MST was calculated from both the date of diagnosis and the initiation of DDW consumption, as the patients already exhibit prolonged survival from the time of diagnosis before starting DDW. All statistical computations were performed by using the software SPSS v25. The study was performed retrospectively, and all statistical results were declared significant with p < 0.05. For correlation analysis, the Pearson method was used. The calculations were performed by Adware Research Ltd. (Balatonfüred, Hungary).

Results

Characteristics of Patients Population

The 2,649 patients were divided into two primary groups in terms of staging: 2,393 patients (90.4%) had active tumors at the start of DDW consumption (Tumor Group, TG), while 256 patients (9.6%) were in complete remission (Remission Group, RG). The TG included 1,083 males (45.2%) and 1,310 females (54.8%), while the RG comprised 75 males (29.2%) and 181 females (70.8%). Figure 1 illustrates that, over a cumulative follow-up period of 111,965 months (9,690 years) to the end of the study, 609 patients (22.9% of the total evaluated population of 2,649) died while 2,040 patients were still alive. Among the surviving patients, 88.3% belonged to the TG and 11.7% to the RG. Among the deceased, 306 (50.2%) patients were male and 303 (49.8%) were female, representing 26.5% of the male population and 20.3% of the female population, respectively.

Notably, 591 (97%) of the deceased individuals (299 males and 292 females) were from the TG, while 18 individuals (7 males and 11 females), accounting for 3% of the deceased population, belonged to the RG.

The patients were divided into 12 groups based on their primary tumor types (see Table 1), and the percentage distribution of the types was compared to the distribution of the same tumor types in the Hungarian cancer population.

The data reveal strong parallels between the distribution of cancer types in the DDW-consuming population and the overall Hungarian cancer population. The four major cancer categories—digestive, breast, lung, and urological cancers—accounted for 66.7% of the DDW-consuming population, closely aligning with the 68% observed in the Hungarian cancer population. Among the smaller cancer groups, brain tumors were notably overrepresented in the DDW-consuming cohort, while gynecological tumors were underrepresented compared to the national distribution.

This substantial similarity between the two groups validates comparing data from the DDW-consuming population to the calculated median survival time for the Hungarian cancer population.

Survival Outcomes

MST Calculation for the Entire Study Population

In the first step of analysis, the entire patient population was examined without imposing any restrictions on the duration of DDW consumption or the disease stage at initiation. Table 2 summarizes the cumulative follow-up periods for all 2,649 patients, from the date of diagnosis to the end of the follow-up.

Table 2. Summary of the Cumulative Durations for Various Phases of the Follow-up Periods, Along with the Calculated Median and Average Durations per Patient.

	Years	Median (months)	Average and SD (months)
Cumulative time elapsed from diagnosis to the start of DDW consumption	4,210	3.8	19.0±37.8
Cumulative duration of DDW consumption	2,709	7.3	12.2±15.4
Cumulative duration of follow-up after stopping DDW consumption	2,771	0	6.6±25.6
Cumulative time elapsed from diagnosis to the end of follow-up	9,690	22.7	43.8±54.2
Cumulative time elapsed from the start of DDW consumption to the end of follow-up	5,480	10.3	24.8±39.7

As shown in Table 2, half of the patients began consuming DDW not more than 3.8 months after their tumor diagnosis, with an average time of 19.0 months. Additionally, 50% of the patients consumed DDW for more than half a year (7.3 months), while the average duration of DDW consumption exceeded one year (12.2 months). Furthermore, half of the patients were followed for nearly two years (22.7 months). Figure 3 shows the Kaplan-Meier curve calculated from the date of diagnosis (A) and Pearson’s correlation between the length of DDW consumption and survival time (B). The MST from diagnosis was 12.4 years (149.0 months; 95% CI: 118.6–179.3). In Figure 4, analogous data, calculated from the start of DDW consumption, are presented. The MST from the start of DDW treatment was 7.6 years (92.2 months; 95% CI: 71.8–112.5). The correlation between the length of DDW treatment and survival times was statistically significant, calculated both from the start of diagnosis (Pearson’s coefficient: r=0.476, p<0.001) and from the start of DDW treatment (r=0.635, p<0.001). The correlation between survival times calculated from the start of diagnosis and those calculated from the start of DDW treatment was also statistically significant (r=0.717, p<0.001).

MST Calculation for the Tumor Group

As shown in Figure 1, two groups of patients were created regarding the staging; 256 patients out of 2,649 started to consume DDW in complete remission (remission group, RG), and 2,393 had tumors at the start (Tumor Group, TG). The good prognosis of the 256 patients in RG, (only 3% of them died during the follow-up period), strongly increased the MST value of the entire study population. Hence, the next step was to evaluate the MST of the 2,393 patients with detected tumor (TG). Given the dissimilar efficacy of therapies in tumors of various organs (localization), it was essential to compare the distribution of tumor types in the TG and RG with that in the whole population before MST for TG was calculated.

The numbers in Table 3 show that removing RG (less than 10% of the cases) from the entire population did not modify the composition of TG much compared to the whole study population. Hence, the median survival time (MST) of the 2,393 patients in TG remained comparable to the historical controls. The composition of RG, in contrast, differs considerably from that of the whole patient population, resulting from the mentioned varying efficacy of conventional therapies. Breast cancer is strongly overrepresented (34.8% in RG vs 17.9% in the general population), reflecting the high success rates of conventional treatments for this cancer type. Conversely, lung cancer is notably underrepresented (4.3% vs. 15.8%), consistent with the fact that only 10% of lung cancer cases are operable. The differences regarding the other cancer types are minor.

TG is considered a homogeneous population, as all patients had tumors at the time they began consuming DDW. MST in the whole TG was 10.9 years when calculated from diagnosis and 5.8 years from the start of DDW consumption— ca. 20% shorter than the corresponding data of the whole study population. Even so, the MST of the 2,393 TG patients showed a significant increase—4.5-fold and 2.4-fold—compared to the Hungarian cancer population, which had an MST of 2.4 years.

MST Calculation Considering the Mortality and the Duration of DDW Consumption

As shown above, the inclusion of the RG in the MST calculation increased the overall MST. It is also evident that mortality cases strongly influence MST. During the cumulative follow-up period of 9,690 years, 609 patients died (Table 2.), with 97% of these cases belonging to the TG. It is of note that the average time between diagnosis and the initiation of DDW consumption was similar for TG patients who remained alive and those who had died (19.9 vs. 19.1 months), suggesting that the patient’s general stage at the start of DDW consumption was the primary determinant of their outcomes. To prove that the number of deaths was counted month by month in the first two years, separately from the date of diagnosis and the start of DDW consumption.

As shown in Table 4, 228 cancer patients passed away within the first eight months from the start of DDW consumption. Analyzing mortality cases based on both the date of diagnosis and the initiation of DDW consumption revealed that 80 out of these 228 deaths occurred within the first eight months from diagnosis, while the remaining 148 patients had a more extended medical history—exceeding eight months—before starting DDW consumption.

Notably, for the 80 patients with short survival, the average time between diagnosis and the start of DDW consumption was just one month, indicating that the mortality of the 80 cases was likely due to the poor prognosis at the time DDW consumption was initiated and not to any delay in the initiation. For the other 148 patients, the average period was 27.9 months. This 27.9-month duration is eight months longer than the average calculated for the entire population.

Another critical factor to consider is the duration of DDW consumption. Table 4 provides data on the number of fatalities, the average time elapsed between diagnosis and the initiation of DDW, and the length of DDW consumption of the 228 patients.

The data demonstrates that from the third month onward, patients who passed away often had a long medical history before beginning with DDW. Additionally, for those who died within the first two to three months, the duration of DDW consumption was remarkably short (0.5-2 months). These phenomena point to limiting factors, such as the minimum time required for DDW to exert its effect and the patient’s condition from which the progression is still (or is no longer) reversible or stoppable. To determine the boundaries by means of MST calculation, we again took the whole TG, and exclude from the evaluation, month by month, those patients who passed away within the first 8 months of DDW use (and those data are presented in Table 4). Table 5 shows the number of patients evaluated and the corresponding MST values.

It is important to note that the 228 patients who died within 8 months after DDW consumption represent 37% of the 609 patients who died during the entire follow-up period of 9,690 years, indicating that these patients were in an advanced stage of the disease at the start of DDW consumption or more probably even at the diagnosis. The cumulative follow-up time of the 228 patients was 444 years, representing only 4.5% of the cumulative follow-up time of the entire cancer population, and 79% (351 years) of the 444 years elapsed between the diagnosis and the start of DDW consumption, confirming that these patients’ disease dragged on for long times, possibly years, before they decided to start with DDW. When excluding patients who passed away within the first three months of DDW consumption, the MST from the beginning of DDW consumption increased from 70 months to 76 months. Excluding early deaths does, of course, raise MST—but these data (and experiences of application) suggest that consuming DDW for sufficiently long time contributes to extended survival, even in patients with late-stage conditions. To explore this latter possibility the relationship between the length of DDW consumption and MST was investigated.

A minimum volume of DDW must obviously be consumed to reduce internal deuterium concentration sufficiently to induce a tumor response. To see the effect of duration (and hence, overall volume) of DDW consumption, MST of the whole tumor group (described above) was taken, and MST was re-calculated with the step-by-step exclusion of patients consuming DDW for less than 31, 61, 91, 121, 151, and 181 days. (The patient cohort was highly heterogeneous regarding the duration of DDW consumption, with some individuals consuming it for only a few days or months while others continued for several months or even years.) Table 6 summarizes the patients evaluated and the MST calculated from diagnosis and start of DDW consumption.

The data indicates a four-month increase in MST when calculated from the start of DDW consumption for the population consuming DDW for more than 90 days and an additional four-month increase for those consuming DDW for over 120 days (that is, the rise of MST was in both cases longer than the increase in the duration of DDW use). Table 6 supports the earlier described correlation: prolonged consumption of DDW is associated with extended survival. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that DDW requires a consumption period of at least 90, but better 120, days to exert its beneficial effects.

MST Among Patients Who Met the Above Criteria of Life Expectancy and Length of DDW Consumption

The data presented in the previous sections indicated that consuming DDW during the late stage of cancer provided limited benefits and that a minimum length of DDW consumption was necessary to impact survival. Namely, a successful DDW application requires more than 90-120 days of DDW consumption and a corresponding life expectancy of 3-4 months. The following assessment was focused on the population that met both prerequisites. The calculation was done with two exclusion criteria.

When patients with <91 days survival and <91 days of DDW consumption were excluded, 2,035 patients remained (group: 91SURV91DDW), and the MST from diagnosis was 10.1 years (121.6 months, 95% CI: 100.0–143.3). From the initiation of DDW treatment, it was 6.2 years (74.5 months, 95% CI: 61.2–87.8).

When the exclusion was extended to patients with <121 days survival and <121 days DDW consumption, 1,758 patients remained (group 121SURV121DDW). MST from diagnosis was 11.0 years (132.3 months, 95% CI: 107.2–157.3), and from the initiation of DDW treatment, 6.5 years (78.1 months, 95% CI: 62.6–93.6).

In both cases, as with the entire population (Figure 3 and 4), the correlation between the duration of DDW treatment and survival times—whether calculated from diagnosis or the start of DDW treatment—was statistically significant (r = 0.460, r = 0.456, p <0.001; r = 0.643, r = 0.634, p <0.001). The correlation between survival times from diagnosis and the start of DDW treatment was also statistically significant (r=0.683, p<0.001).

These findings show that among those cancer patients who survived and consumed DDW long enough for deuterium depletion to exert its effect, DDW consumption extended the historical control survival time of 2.4 years to an MST of 10.1–11.0 years from diagnosis and 6.2–6.5 years from the initiation of DDW treatment. These findings, along with the data in Table 6, demonstrate that even minor variations in the duration of DDW consumption (and similarly, the time between diagnosis and the initiation of DDW, see Table 4) intake can lead to multiplied changes in MST.

DDW Consumption Delays the Progression of the Disease and Prevents Relapses Among the RG

The cumulative follow-up time of 256 patients who began consuming DDW while in complete remission amounted to 14,289 months (1,190 years). This group included all 12 cancer types, as detailed in Table 7. By the data collection cut-off date of November 12, 2024, 18 patients passed away. Table 7 presents the distribution of these losses across different types of cancer, offering insights into mortality patterns within this cohort.

The extremely low mortality rate (7%) in RG made calculating the MST from diagnosis data impossible. However, when calculated from the start of DDW consumption, the MST for RG patients was 23.2 years.

It is of interest that the time gap from diagnosis to start of DDW consumption was, on average, half as long in the RG (10.5±23.7 months, median: 2.8 months) as in the TG (20.0±38.9 months, median: 4.0 months). This suggests another critical factor; the time that elapsed between the diagnosis and the start of DDW consumption. MST of those patients in the entire cancer population who started to consume DDW within 3, 6, or 9 months after diagnosis was stable and high, 11.1-11.3 years. However, there was almost a two-year drop in MST (9.6 years) involving those who started over 12 months after the diagnosis.

This finding underscores the critical role of early cancer detection combined with timely and appropriate therapy that can lead to complete remission. In the RG, all patients began consuming DDW within one year of their diagnosis, still free of disease progression.

Evaluation of MST by Unifying the Patient Groups Where DDW Application Was Found to Be Efficient

After applying the above defined criteria of life expectancy and length of DDW consumption and including the 256 patients of the RG group, 2,291 and 2,014 patients were analyzed.

When the time limit of DDW use was set to <91 days, the median survival time of the 2,291 patients (91SURV91DDW+256) from diagnosis was 12.2 years (146.9 months; 95% CI: 120.0–173.9), and from the start of DDW treatment, 8 years (96.4 months; 95% CI: 76.5–116.3). The correlation between the length of DDW treatment and survival times calculated both from diagnosis (r=0.466, p<0.001) and from the start of DDW treatment (r=0.616, p<0.001) was statistically significant.

Setting the time limit to <121 days, 2,014 patients (121SURV121DDW+256) were evaluated. Their median survival time from diagnosis was 13 years (156.2 months; 95% CI: 120.8–185.5), and from the start of DDW treatment, 8.7 years (105.0 months; 95% CI: 82.8–127.1). The correlation between the length of DDW treatment and survival times was significant, calculated both from the start of diagnosis (r=0.462, p<0.001) and the beginning of DDW treatment (r=0.604, p<0.001). The correlation between survival times calculated from the start of diagnosis and the start of DDW treatment was also statistically significant (r=0.730, p<0.001). These data show again that, for the anticancer effect of DDW to take place, the application should not be shorter than 90 days.

To check if the above selection caused any noteworthy distortion in the data, the distribution of different cancer types, after excluding patients with limited survival times and insufficient DDW consumption, was compared to the original distribution of cancer types.

As seen in Table 8, patients with digestive cancers are underrepresented in both selected groups, while breast and lung cancer cases became slightly overrepresented compared to the composition of the total study population. Aside from that, however, the overall distribution of cancer types within the population remained, after excluding patients with early death and short-term DDW consumption, largely unchanged.

Correlation of DDW Consumption and Survival in Patients Who Were Followed Up Until Death

At the level of individual patients involved in the study, the end of follow-up was when no more data was received, not necessarily their death. It was supposed, however, that the DDW consumption and survival data of those who were followed up until death could demonstrate the survival prolongation by deuterium depletion more clearly. In Figure 5, a dense cluster of data points delineate the straight line “y=x” showing the fate of patients who used DDW up to death. Other data points, scattered upwards, belong to patients who consumed DDW for a given period but lived on without further deuterium depletion. Such cases (observable also in Figure 3B and Figure 4B) may provide the best proof of the beneficial effect of deuterium depletion on the survival of cancer patients.

Discussion

There is no doubt that significant advances have been made in cancer therapy over the past decades. However, prognoses show that current treatments have not led—and are unlikely to lead—to a true breakthrough in oncology.⁷ The greatest paradox of the prevailing approach is that, despite recognizing the immense complexity of genetic and biochemical processes of the cells, we seek solutions by targeting specific genetic mutations or using single molecules to selectively inhibit or influence isolated processes or, more precisely, the functional proteins responsible for them.

More than forty years ago Albert Szent-Györgyi raised the question of whether harmonic regulation of the rapid and complex biochemical and genetic processes of a cell is (or can be) realized at the molecular level. He assumed that large protein molecules (the typical main targets of drug development) were incapable of regulating these processes, and stated that a sub-molecular regulatory system, based on electrons—very lightweight and mobile elementary particles -, fulfills this role.²⁸ The data obtained with DDW^7-10 confirmed that sub-molecular changes, namely, increase or decrease of D/H ratio, significantly impact the processes within the cells.

This cellular effect of altering the D/H ratio by deuterium depletion resulted at a systemic level in a severalfold increase in the median survival time (MST) of cancer patients consuming DDW in the studies referred to above^19-22 compared to historical controls. These findings underscore the importance of identifying key parameters for fully harnessing the potential of deuterium depletion when integrating it into conventional cancer therapy.

The results of the present study, based on real-world data of 2,649 patients consuming DDW, showed the possible significant impact of integrating deuterium depletion into conventional oncotherapy, and highlighted both its potentials and limitations. The MST for the patients involved increased to 12.4 years from the time of diagnosis and to 7.6 years from the start of DDW consumption, representing a five- and three-fold increase compared to the 2.4-year MST of the overall Hungarian cancer population. Among the patients with detectable tumors (TG group) MST was 5.8 years from the initiation of DDW consumption. In the RG group (patients in remission when starting deuterium depletion) MST from the start of DDW consumption was 23.2 years.

To find the optimal conditions for integrating DDW into conventional therapy, subgroups within the 2,649 cases were defined based on time parameters (see Tables 4, 5, 6 and 8), and their MST was analyzed. It was concluded that, to maximize the efficacy of DDW, a life expectancy of not less than 3-4 months at the start of DDW consumption is necessary, the length of DDW consumption should be longer than 90-120 days, and DDW consumption should start not later than 9 months after diagnosis. The evidence for these requirements, MST data for all the subgroups calculated from the start of DDW consumption, are summarized in Table 9.

The data showed that excluding patients with a short application period (who died within 90–120 days after start of DDW or who consumed DDW for less than 90–120 days) increased the MST from 5.8 years to 6.1–6.5 years. When both criteria were applied, MST for patients who lived longer than 90–120 days and consumed DDW for more than 90–120 days went up to 8.0–8.7 years.

However, the most critical factor, highlighted by the numbers in Table 9, was the time gap between diagnosis and initiation of DDW consumption. When DDW consumption started within 9 months after diagnosis, the MST rose to 11.3 years (95% CI: 8.4–14.1), but it dropped to 9.6 years (95% CI: 7.2-11.8) starting over a year after diagnosis. When the calculation was restricted to patients who lived longer than 120 days after starting DDW and consumed it for more than 120 days, only a minimal additional increase in MST (to 11.6 years) was observed.

This population, who began to use DDW within 9 months after diagnosis, achieved a nearly 5-fold increase in MST compared to the average Hungarian cancer population, emphasizing the importance of timely and sustained DDW consumption in improving survival outcomes.

With an MST of 11.6 years, Hungary’s annual cancer death toll could drop from 33,000 to approximately 5,000–7,000, potentially saving 26,000–28,000 lives each year. In Europe, the cancer death toll could be reduced by 825,000 to 880,000 lives through the integration of deuterium depletion into conventional therapy. This represents a dramatic improvement for the cancer population, underscoring the potential life-saving impact of integrating DDW consumption into therapy.

Deuterium depletion constitutes a paradigm-shifting approach by abandoning the focus on single targets within the cell regulation. Gene expression studies indeed demonstrated that altering deuterium concentration had a profound impact on entire cells or organisms.

In humans, 200–300 genes regulate the cell cycle directly, while many additional genes indirectly engage in related signaling pathways and repair mechanisms. Two previous studies[25,30] demonstrated that the expression of specific genes associated with tumor development, such as c-Myc and K-Ras, H-Ras, Bcl2, p53, was inhibited in carcinogen-treated mice consuming DDW. This suggests a potential role of intracellular deuterium level in modulating gene expression linked to tumorigenesis, offering promising insights for future research and therapeutic applications.

An elevated D/H ratio seems thus essential for triggering the expression of specific genes associated with tumor development. A recent study[31] utilizing nanostring technology investigated the expression of 236 cancer-related genes and 536 kinase genes in deuterium-depleted (40 and 80 ppm D), deuterium-enriched (300 ppm), and regular (150 ppm) media. From the total, 124 cancer-related genes and 135 kinase genes (those with expression changes exceeding 30% and a copy number above 30) were evaluated.

Only seven genes exhibited altered expressions (one upregulated and six downregulated) in deuterium-depleted media, but 97.3% of the evaluated genes were upregulated on deuterium enrichment. These findings align with the above-mentioned in vivo mouse studies, demonstrating that DDW keeps the D concentration at a low level and inhibits its rise to the threshold necessary to trigger the expression of genes induced by carcinogens. Research confirmed that consuming DDW prevents the increase in the D/H ratio, thereby blocking the activation of the entire set of genes involved in cell cycle regulation. In harmony with these results, a cell cycle analysis revealed that DDW caused cell cycle arrest in the G1/S transition, reduced the number of cells in the S phase, and significantly increased the population of cells in the G1 phase.[32]

DDW reduces the body’s deuterium concentration[33] effectively mimicking the role of mitochondria in producing deuterium-depleted metabolic water. Studies suggest that lowering deuterium levels impacts cellular metabolism and generates free radicals[29], demanding rapid and efficient adaptive responses. Healthy cells with fully functional mitochondria and metabolism can successfully manage this metabolic challenge. In contrast, cancer cells, which typically lack such mitochondrial functionality, fail to adapt, leading to apoptosis, necrosis, and observable tumor regression.[9,10]

Safety is a primary concern in the case of any novel therapeutic method to be applied in humans. As for deuterium depletion, the consumption of DDW with 25–125 ppm deuterium content has proven to be safe, with no unexpected toxic or harmful effects observed.[19,26,27] In contrast, some beneficial effects beyond tumor growth inhibition were observed. In a Phase 2 clinical trial involving 30 patients with pre or manifest diabetes, significant increase in blood cell counts within the normal range and a reduction in fasting blood glucose levels were observed.[26] These findings were consistent with observations in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and consuming DDW, where significant blood count deterioration was either absent or delayed. A general improvement in the patients’ physical strength and well-being, associated with DDW consumption, was also repeatedly found. The underlying mechanism is likely the one described in a test with top athletes, where a 44-day regimen of 105 ppm DDW consumption resulted in a delayed increase in lactic acid levels and a reduced anion gap, indicating more efficient mitochondrial function.[27]

On the other hand, tumor necrosis caused by deuterium depletion was not without some kind of side effects. The most characteristic changes were weakness, drowsiness, increased temperature, fever spikes, intermittently increasing pain, swelling, and softening of the tumor-affected area, minor bleeding in the bladder, stomach, or rectum, brick dust urine, and transient coughing in lung cancer.²⁴ All these side effects were tolerable by the patients and were transient.

In several cases, patients involved in the present study used various supplementary or alternative treatments in parallel with conventional oncotherapy and DDW consumption, and the data suggested a possible negative interaction between deuterium depletion and certain supplementary methods. After a thorough evaluation, several factors were identified that significantly diminished the effectiveness of DDW or rendered it entirely ineffective. These included high doses of antioxidants, such as vitamins A, C, E, and selenium; consumption of Coenzyme Q10 supplements; iron supplementation; intense and prolonged physical exertion; as well as the use of hot tubs and saunas. Understanding these influences can provide critical guidance for optimizing the efficacy of DDW application and highlights the importance of managing patient lifestyles and supplementary treatments during deuterium depletion.

The groundbreaking findings in this study underscore the pivotal role of the D/H ratio in regulating and coordinating millions of molecular processes, including biochemical and genetic functions involved in carcinogenesis. At the eukaryotic level, a sub-molecular regulatory system (SMRS) governs the intricate complexity of life. Utilization of the capacities of DDW enables an intervention in this fundamental regulatory system, opening new avenues for therapeutic applications and a deeper understanding of cellular processes.

Supported by HYD LLC for Cancer Research and Drug Development, Budapest, Hungary

We sincerely thank the patients consuming DDW and their families for voluntarily sharing their experiences and outcomes before, during, and after DDW consumption. Their insights, along with the results of follow-up oncology examinations confirming the effectiveness of conventional treatments, are invaluable.

Appendix

The authors’ full names and academic degrees are as follows: Gábor Somlyai, Ph.D. András Papp, Ph.D. Ildikó Somlyai Msc. Beáta Zs. Kovács, Ph.D. Mária Debrődi, MD

The authors’ affiliations are as follows: HYD LLC for Cancer Research and Drug Development, Budapest (G.S., I.S., B.Zs.K. and M.D); Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, (A.P.)

References

M. Heron. Deaths: Leading Causes for 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2021, 70, 1–114. [Google Scholar]
European Cancer Information System, 2022.
E. Ferlay, J. Steliarova-Foucher, S. Lortet-Tieulent, W. J. Rosso, H. Coebergh, D. Comber, F. Forman and F. Bray. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 2013, 49, 1374–1403. [Google Scholar]
American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2022. Atlanta, 2022.
R. L. Siegek, D. K. Miller and A. Jemal. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar]
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/rakugyi-orszagprofil-magyarorszag-2023_39a8899f-hu;jsessionid=jIUmnevlSHy4bbI-BYkZe60gfGz-cMdPQGulTsnN.ip-10-240-5-61. [Online].
H. M. Bizuayehu, A. F. Dadi, K. Y. Ahmed, T. K. Tegegne, T. A. Hassen, G. D. Kibret, D. B. Ketema, M. G. Bore, S. Thapa, D. B. Odo, Z. Y. Kassa, D. M. Shifti, E. Amsalu, Sarich, R. L. Venchiarutti, Y. A. Melaku, K. T. Kibret, A. Habte, Y. M. Mefsin, A. Seid and S. A. Belachew. Burden of 30 cancers among men: Global statistics in 2022 and projections for 2050 using population-based estimates. Cancer 2024, 130, 3708–3723. [Google Scholar]
Ladanie, A. M. Schmitt, B. Speich, F. Naudet, A. Agarwal, T. V. Pereira, F. Sclafani, A. Herbrand, M. Briel, J. Martin-Liberal, T. Schmid, H. Ewald, A. Ioannidis, H. C. Bucher, B. Kasenda and L. G. Hemkens. Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Novel Cancer Therapies Between 2000 and 2016. JAMA Netw Open 2020, 3, 2024406. [Google Scholar]
Y. Lu and H. Chen. Deuterium-Depleted Water in Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Experimental Trials. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1397. [Google Scholar]
J. Qu, Y. Xu, S. Zhao, L. Xiong, J. Jing, S. Lui, J. Huang and H. Shi. The biological impact of deuterium and therapeutic potential of deuterium-depleted water. Front Pharmacol 2024, 15, 1431204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
G. Somlyai, G. Jancsó, G. Jákli, K. Vass, B. Barna, V. Lakics and T. Gaál. Naturally occurring deuterium is essential for the normal growth rate of. FEBS Lett 1993, 317, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
R. J. Gillies, R. Martinez-Zaguilan, G. M. Martinez, R. Serrano and R. Perona. Tumorigenic 3T3 cells maintain an alkaline intracellular pH under physiological conditions. Prod. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 7414–7418. [Google Scholar]
J. Pouysségur, C. Sardet, A. Franchi, G. L’Allemain and S. Paris. A specific mutation abolishing Na+/H+ antiport activity in hamster fibroblasts precludes growth at neutral and acidic pH. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 4833–4837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
R. Perona and R. Serano. Increased pH and tumorigenicity of fibroblasts expressing a yeast proton pum. Nature 1988, 334, 438–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kotyk, M. Dvoráková and J. Koryta. Deuterons cannot replace protons in active transport processes in yeast. FEBS Lett. 1990, 264, 203–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Warburg. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956, 123, 309–314. [Google Scholar]
T. Seyfried, R. Flores, A. Poff and D. D’Agostino. Cancer as a metabolic disease: Implications for novel therapeutics. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 515–527. [Google Scholar]
G. Somlyai, L. I. Nagy, L. G. Puskás, A. Papp, B. Z. Kovács, I. Fórizs, G. Czuppon and I. Somlyai. Deuterium Content of the Organic Compounds in Food Has an Impact onTumor Growth in Mice. Current Issues in Molecular Biology 2023, 45, 66–77. [Google Scholar]
Kovács, I. Guller, K. Krempels, I. Somlyai, I. Jánosi, Z. Gyöngyi, I. Szabó, I. Ember and G. Somlyai. Deuterium Depletion May Delay the Progression of. Journal of Cancer Therapy 2011, 2, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
G. Somlyai, B. Z. Kovács, I. Somlyai, A. Papp, L. I. Nagy and L. G. Puskás. Deuterium depletion inhibits lung cancer cell growth and migration in vitro and results in severalfold increase of median survival time of non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving conventional therapy. Cancer Res The 2021, 9, 12–19. [Google Scholar]
K. Krempels, I. Somlyai, Z. Gyöngyi, I. Ember, K. Balog, O. Abonyi and G. Somlyai. A retrospective study of survival in breast cancer patients. J Cancer Res Ther 2013, 1, 194–200. [Google Scholar]
G. Somlyai, B. Z. Kovács, A. Papp and I. Somlyai. A Preliminary Study Indicating Improvement in the Median Survival Time of Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients by the Application of Deuterium Depletion in Combination with Conventional Therapy. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1989. [Google Scholar]
C. Nabhan, A. Klink and V. Prasad. Real-world Evidence-What Does It Really Mean? JAMA Oncol 2019, 5, 781–783. [Google Scholar]
G. Somlyai, Deuterium Depletion—A New Way in Curing Cancer and Preserving Health, Rewood City, CA, USA, PublishDrive, 2021.
Z. Gyöngyi, F. Budán, I. Szabó, I. Ember, K. Kiss, K. Krempels, I. Somlyai and G. Somlyai. Deuterium depleted water effects on survival of lung cancer patients and expression of Kras, Bcl2, and Myc genes in mouse lung. Nutr Cancer 2012, 65, 240–246. [Google Scholar]
G. Somlyai, I. Somlyai, I. Fórizs, G. Czuppon, A. Papp and M. Molnár. Effect of Systemic Subnormal Deuterium Level on Metabolic Syndrome Related and other Blood Parameters in Humans: A Preliminary Study. Molecules 2020, 25, 1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Györe and, G. Somlyai. The effect of deuterium depleted drinking water on the performance of sportsmen. Hungarian Review of Sports Medicine 2005, 27–38. [Google Scholar]
Szent-Györgyi. The living state and cancer. Physiol Chem Phys 1980, 12, 99–110. [Google Scholar]
X. Zhang, M. Gaetani, A. Chernobrovkin and R. A. Zubarev. Anticancer Effect of Deuterium Depleted Water—Redox Disbalance Leads to Oxidative Stress. 2019, 18, 2373–2387.
Z. Gyöngyi and G. Somlyai. Deuterium Depletion can Decrease the Expression of c-myc, Ha-Ras and p53 Gene in Carcinogen-Treated Mice. In vivo 2000, 14, 437–440.
B. Z. Kovács, L. G. Puskás, L. I. Nagy, A. Papp, Z. Gyöngyi, I. Fórizs, G. Czuppon, I. Somlyai and G. Somlyai. Blocking the Increase of Intracellular Deuterium Concentration Prevents the Expression of Cancer-Related Genes, Tumor Development, and Tumor Recurrence in Cancer Patients. Cancer Control 2022, 10732748211068963,.
H. Wang, B. Zhu, Z. He, H. Fu, Z. Dai, G. Huang, B. Li, D. Quin, X. Zhang, L. Tian, W. Fang and H. Yang. Deuterium-depleted water (DDW) inhibits the proliferation and migration of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells in vitro. Biomed Pharmacother. 2013, 67, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
G. Somlyai, A. Papp, Z. B. Kovács and I. Somlyai. Exhaled Breath Vapor of Humans Reflects the Changes in Deuterium Concentration in the Body Water. Natural Science 2024, 16, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Figure 1. Subgroups of 2,649 Patients Based on Gender, and Staging at the Start and the End of DDW Consumption.

Figure 2. Cumulative Duration Times of 2,649 Patients from the Date of Diagnosis to the End of Follow-up.

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier Curve of 2,649 Patients Calculated from the Date of Diagnosis (A) and Pearson’s Correlation Between the Length of DDW Consumption and Survival (B).

Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier Curve of 2,649 Patients Calculated from the Date of Starting DDW Consumption (A) and Pearson’s Correlation Between the Length of DDW Consumption and Survival.

Figure 5. Pearson’s Correlation Between the Length of DDW Consumption and Survival in the 609 Patients Who Were Followed up until Death.

Table 1. Percent Distribution of Major Cancer Types in the Follow-Up Population (N = 2,649).

Primary localization of the tumor	Number of enrolled patients	Percentage of the cancer types in the DDW-consuming population	Percentage of the cancer types in the Hungarian cancer population
Digestive	529	20.0	23
Breast	475	17.9	20
Lung	419	15.8	15
Urological	345	13.0	10
Hematopoietic	212	8.0	5
Brain	189	7.1	2
Gynecological	195	7.4	12
Head and neck	106	4.0	3
Bone and soft parts	73	2.8	1
Skin	63	2.4	5
Juvenile	16	0.6	1
Other	27	1.0	3

Table 3. Percent Distribution of Major Cancer Types in the Tumor Group and Remission Group.

Primary localization of cancer	Patients in TG		Patients in RG		Patients in the whole study population, percentage
‍	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Patients in the whole study population, percentage
Digestive	482	20.1	47	18.4	20.0
Breast	386	16.1	89	34.8	17.9
Lung	408	17	11	4.3	15.8
Urological	318	13.3	27	10.5	13.0
Hematopoietic	222	8.4	10	3.9	8.0
Brain	172	7.2	17	6.6	7.1
Gynecological	170	7.1	25	9.8	7.4
Head and neck	94	3.9	12	4.7	4.0
Bone and soft parts	70	2.9	3	1.2	2.8
Skin	53	2.2	10	3.9	2.4
Juvenile	13	0.5	3	1.2	0.6
Other	25	1.0	2	0.8	1.0

Table 4. Average Time of the 228 patients in TG who died during the follow-up.

Months between start of DDW and deaths	Number of death cases	Average time between diagnosis and start of DDW (months)	Average length of DDW consumption (months)
1	6	3.6	0.5
2	10	5.7	1.3
3	12	19.9	2.0
4	44	20.0	3.3
5	39	17.4	4.3
6	46	17.9	5.7
7	36	20.4	6.2
8	35	20.6	7.0

Table 5. Number of Patients Evaluated After Excluding Those Who Died Within the First Eight Months of DDW Consumption, and the Calculated MST From the Date of Diagnosis and the Start of DDW Consumption.

Months between start of DDW and deaths	Number of patients excluded	Number of patients evaluated	MST from the diagnosis (months)	MST from the DDW start (months)
0	0	2,393	131	70
1	6	2,387	131	70
2	10	2,377	132	71
3	12	2,365	134	74
4	44	2,321	147	76
5	39	2,282	153	78
6	46	2,236	180	85
7	36	2,200	187	90
8	35	2,165	203	96

Table 6. Number of Patients Evaluated After Excluding Those Who Consumed DDW for a Limited Time and the Calculated MST from the Date of Diagnosis and the Start of DDW Consumption.

Length of DDW consumption	Number of patients	MST from diagnosis (months)	MST from DDW consumption (months)
Longer than 1 day	2,393	131	70
Longer than 30 days	2,287	128	70
Longer than 60 days	2,168	121	71
Longer than 90 days	2,035	121	74
Longer than 120 days	1,758	132	78
Longer than 150 days	1,563	134	82
Longer than 180 days	1,378	146	89

Table 7. Distribution of Cancer Types in Remission Group and Number of Death Cases.

Primary localization of cancer	Number of patients	Percentage	Number of deaths
Digestive	47	18.4	7
Breast	89	34.8	2
Lung	11	4.3	0
Urological	27	10.5	2
Hematopoietic	10	3.9	2
Brain	17	6.6	2
Gynecological	25	9.8	1
Head and neck	12	4.7	1
Bone and soft parts	3	1.2	0
Skin	10	3.9	1
Juvenile	3	1.2	0
Other	2	0.8	0

Table 8. Distribution of Different Cancer Types, after Excluding Patients with Limited Survival Times and Insufficient DDW Consumption.

Primary localization of cancer	91SURV91DDW+256		121SURV121DDW+256		Percentage in the DDW-consuming population	Percentage in the Hungarian cancer population
‍	Number	Percentage	Number	Percentage	Percentage in the DDW-consuming population	Percentage in the Hungarian cancer population
Digestive	428	18.7	370	18.4	20.0	23
Breast	418	18.2	388	19.3	17.9	20
Lung	368	16.1	322	16.0	15.8	15
Urological	305	13.3	261	13.0	13.0	10
Hematopoietic	191	8.3	163	8.1	8.0	5
Brain	162	7.1	142	7.1	7.1	2
Gynecological	171	7.5	151	7.5	7.4	12
Head and neck	94	4.1	84	4.2	4.0	3
Bone and soft parts	65	2.8	57	2.8	2.8	1
Skin	51	2.2	44	2.2	2.4	5
Juvenile	16	0.7	14	0.7	0.6	1
Other	22	1.0	18	0.9	1.0	3

Table 9. MST Data for the Whole Study Population and Subgroups Defined with the Parameters Explained in the Footnote.

Name of the group	Number of patients	MST from the start of DDW consumption (years)
The Entire Group of Patients (EG=TG+RG)	2,649	7.6
TG	2,393	5.8
RG	256	23.2
TGSURV91	2,365	6.1
TGSURV121	2,322	6.3
TGDDW91	2,035	6.1
TGDDW121	1,758	6.5
EGSURV91DDW91	2,291	8.0
EGSURV121DDW121	2,014	8.7
EGDDWwithin 9 months	1,651	11.3
EGSURV91DDW91DDWwithin 9 months	1,414	11.3
EGSURV121DDW121DDWwithin 9 months	1,243	11.6
Hungarian historical control	70,000	2.4

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.