Submitted:
28 February 2025
Posted:
28 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
2.2. Plant Material and Sample Preparation
2.3. Ascorbic Acid
2.4. Total Phenols and Flavonoids
2.5. Antioxidant Activity
2.6. Magnesium and Calcium Content
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Water-Soluble Magnesium Content
3.2. Water-Soluble Calcium Content
3.2.1. Ca/Mg Ratio
3.3. Dry Matter
3.4. Yield
3.5. Ascorbic Acid
3.6. Total Phenolic Content
3.7. Flavonoids
3.8. Antioxidant Activity
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Variant | Vitamin C [mg·kg−1 FW] | TAC DPPH [mg·kg−1 FW] | Flavonoids [mg·kg−1 FW] | Total phenols [mg·kg−1 FW] | Dry matter [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cress | |||||
| C | 197.3 ±33.8ab | 845.3 ±62.9a | 289.9 ±2.1bc | 1624.0 ±57.2cd | 7.8 ±0.2bc |
| Mg1 | 193.6 ±19.3bc | 886.2 ±81.7a | 313.2 ±21.6ab | 1829.3 ±260.8abc | 8.4 ±0.7ab |
| Mg2 | 160.0 ±6.1cd | 856.8 ±47.2a | 278.9 ±8.7bc | 1885.1 ±82.4abc | 6.9 ±0.2d |
| Mg3 | 169.4 ±13.4bc | 843.8 ±38.2a | 303.6 ±8.8ab | 1893.4 ±97.0abc | 7.3 ±0.5cd |
| Mg4 | 159.7 ±16.1cd | 952.9 ±83.9a | 329.6 ±25.1ab | 2128.2 ±230.6abc | 8.2 ±0.5ab |
| Mg5 | 136.0 ±5.8e | 922.5 ±62.2a | 310.7 ±16.1ab | 2003.0 ±123.7abc | 8.8 ±0.7ab |
| Mustard | |||||
| C | 297.4 ±5.0bc | 889.5 ±77.3bc | 394.3 ±14.0ab | 3431.8 ±224.7c | 8.7 ±0.4d |
| Mg1 | 285.8 ±16.7bc | 885.8 ±84.3bc | 355.9 ±28.9ab | 3919.3 ±148.4a | 8.8 ±0.4d |
| Mg2 | 304.6 ±23.5ab | 827.4 ±45.9c | 309.6 ±6.6cd | 2974.2 ±362.4c | 8.9 ±0.2d |
| Mg3 | 321.6 ±5.9ab | 936.7 ±71.4bc | 308.3 ±19.3cd | 3275.4 ±167.7c | 9.8 ±0.1c |
| Mg4 | 309.7 ±9.9ab | 962.5 ±28.9ab | 318.1 ±8.2cd | 3499.8 ±100.7c | 10.8 ±0.6ab |
| Mg5 | 345.1 ±31.3a | 938.6 ±18.2ab | 356.8 ±24.3ab | 3730.3 ±47.1b | 10.5 ±0.1ab |
| Broccoli | |||||
| C | 751.3 ±31.9b | 1008.5 ±19.5b | 360.4 ±23.2b | 1699.9 ±3.5b | 8.8 ±0.3a |
| Mg1 | 747.3 ±10.8b | 991.8 ±21.9b | 345.5 ±3.9b | 1673.9 ±7.0b | 9.3 ±0.3a |
| Mg2 | 741.3 ±13.8b | 1010.5 ±21.5b | 352.9 ±3.6b | 1694.0 ±42.2b | 9.0 ±0.4a |
| Mg3 | 744.8 ±3.8b | 993.2 ±22.1b | 361.8 ±6.9b | 1752.4 ±24.6b | 9.1 ±0.5a |
| Mg4 | 757.5 ±6.4b | 985.7 ±17.1b | 349.3 ±17.0b | 1717.2 ±26.7b | 9.6 ±0.5a |
| Mg5 | 882.5 ±13.3a | 1123.3 ±23.5a | 478.5 ±13.5a | 1884.0 ±16.5a | 9.8 ±0.2a |
| Basil | |||||
| C | 44.9 ±2.7ab | 551.2 ±86.4bc | 474.8 ±107.9bcd | 1041.9 ±120.0ab | 11.2 ±1.2a |
| Mg1 | 43.1 ±5.8ab | 618.4 ±26.7bc | 575.1 ±50.3bc | 1114.6 ±30.7ab | 11.0 ±0.7a |
| Mg2 | 37.2 ±5.2bc | 478.0 ±5.7cd | 457.7 ±15.4cd | 1016.5 ±121.4ab | 12.3 ±0.6a |
| Mg3 | 39.1 ±1.3bc | 669.7 ±12.2a | 662.4 ±10.7a | 1135.6 ±7.3ab | 12.7 ±1.6a |
| Mg4 | 44.4 ±3.2ab | 524.2 ±38.5bc | 535.1 ±21.8bc | 942.2 ±114.4bc | 10.7 ±0.7a |
| Mg5 | 51.3 ±4.2a | 478.0 ±53.5cd | 378.3 ±31.1de | 785.9 ±45.6d | 13.7 ±1.3a |
| Sunflower | |||||
| C | 56.4 ±3.4ab | 430.3 ±9.7ab | 481.5 ±24.1a | 1251.10 ±129.2ab | 9.8 ±0.3a |
| Mg1 | 47.2 ±5.7cd | 375.5 ±81.9ab | 415.4 ±50.5a | 872.8 ±70.0bc | 10.4 ±1.2a |
| Mg2 | 41.6 ±2.3e | 328.8 ±54.0cd | 402.6 ±45.3a | 849.3 ±77.9bc | 9.2 ±0.8a |
| Mg3 | 50.5 ±2.1cd | 349.1 ±26.5cd | 382.4 ±46.9a | 906.0 ±61.3bc | 9.9 ±0.4a |
| Mg4 | 51.6 ±4.5ab | 471.1 ±132.0ab | 390.6 ±74.1a | 1092.3 ±191.0ab | 8.0 ±0.3b |
| Mg5 | 62.0 ±6.4a | 564.5 ±146.5ab | 478.9 ±84.3a | 1054.7 ±180.7ab | 10.4 ±0.6a |
| Cucumber | |||||
| C | 78.8 ±5.4ab | 161.1 ±14.6ab | 135.7 ±8.8cd | 703.5 ±56.1ab | 9.9 ±0.5a |
| Mg1 | 66.1 ±1.6c | 154.5 ±7.7bc | 144.3 ±11.5cd | 650.5 ±14.6ab | 8.2 ±0.1b |
| Mg2 | 73.5 ±6.6bc | 180.9 ±8.4ab | 145.4 ±6.7cd | 694.5 ±26.9ab | 9.2 ±0.1a |
| Mg3 | 70.5 ±5.4bc | 127.1 ±9.9de | 137.5 ±11.7ab | 657.0 ±34.3ab | 9.0 ±0.4a |
| Mg4 | 81.2 ±7.1ab | 144.9 ±4.9bc | 152.2 ±12.3bc | 612.9 ±28.3bc | 8.9 ±0.6a |
| Mg5 | 83.7 ±10.7ab | 123.2 ±0.9de | 169.3 ±9.9cd | 620.6 ±17.1bc | 9.7 ±0.4a |
| Treatment | Cress | Mustard | Broccoli | Basil | Sunflower | Cucumber |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 1932 ±5a | 2400 ±202a | 3183 ±86a | 1265 ±54ab | 5041 ±84a | 3975 ±259a |
| Mg1 | 1949 ±111a | 2561 ±131a | 3275 ±85a | 1395 ±46ab | 5021 ±168a | 4285 ±213a |
| Mg2 | 1775 ±104a | 2624 ±89a | 3446 ±141a | 1324 ±112a | 5224 ±203a | 4017 ±254a |
| Mg3 | 1691 ±82a | 2535 ±46a | 3399 ±99a | 1369 ±43ab | 4674 ±113a | 4241 ±104a |
| Mg4 | 1714 ±254a | 2581 ±148a | 3180 ±123a | 1317 ±58ab | 4657 ±141a | 3987 ±45a |
| Mg5 | 1858 ±57a | 2515 ±140a | 3069 ±70a | 1237 ±58b | 4610 ±82a | 4078 ±69a |
References
- Paraschivu, M.; Cotuna, O.; Sărățeanu, V.; Durău, C. C.; Păunescu, R. A. Microgreens—Current Status, Global Market Trends and Forward Statements. Sci. Pap. Manag. Econ. Eng. Agric. Rural Dev. 2021, 21(3). [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, Z.; Lester, G. E.; Park, E.; Saftner, R. A.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q. Evaluation and Correlation of Sensory Attributes and Chemical Compositions of Emerging Fresh Produce: Microgreens. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 110, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caracciolo, F.; El-Nakhel, C.; Raimondo, M.; Kyriacou, M. C.; Cembalo, L.; De Pascale, S.; Rouphael, Y. Sensory Attributes and Consumer Acceptability of 12 Microgreens Species. Agronomy 2020, 10(7), 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viltres-Portales, M.; Sánchez-Martín, M. J.; Llugany, M.; Boada, R.; Valiente, M. Selenium Biofortification of Microgreens: Influence on Phytochemicals, Pigments and Nutrients. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 206, 108283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, A.; Sharma, T.; Singh, S. P.; Bhardwaj, A.; Srivastava, D.; Kumar, R. Prospects of Microgreens as Budding Living Functional Food: Breeding and Biofortification through OMICS and Other Approaches for Nutritional Security. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1053810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lenzi, A.; Orlandini, A.; Bulgari, R.; Ferrante, A.; Bruschi, P. Antioxidant and Mineral Composition of Three Wild Leafy Species: A Comparison between Microgreens and Baby Greens. Foods 2019, 8(10), 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Z.; Codling, E. E.; Luo, Y.; Nou, X.; Lester, G. E.; Wang, Q. Microgreens of Brassicaceae: Mineral Composition and Content of 30 Varieties. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2016, 49, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowitcharoen, L.; Phornvillay, S.; Lekkham, P.; Pongprasert, N.; Srilaong, V. Bioactive Composition and Nutritional Profile of Microgreens Cultivated in Thailand. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(17), 7981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tilahun, S.; Baek, M. W.; An, K. S.; Choi, H. R.; Lee, J. H.; Hong, J. S.; Jeong, C. S. Radish Microgreens Produced without Substrate in a Vertical Multi-Layered Growing Unit Are Rich in Nutritional Metabolites. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1236055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shoeb, E.; Hefferon, K. Crop Biofortification and Food Security. In Plant Nutrition and Food Security in the Era of Climate Change; Academic Press, 2022; pp. 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhaliwal, S. S.; Sharma, V.; Shukla, A. K.; Verma, V.; Kaur, M.; Shivay, Y. S.; Hossain, A. Biofortification—A Frontier Novel Approach to Enrich Micronutrients in Field Crops to Encounter the Nutritional Security. Molecules 2022, 27(4), 1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, A. K.; Seth, A.; Kumar, V.; Datta, A. Agronomic Biofortification of Wheat through Proper Fertilizer Management to Alleviate Zinc Malnutrition: A Review. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2023, 54(2), 154–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renna, M.; D’Imperio, M.; Maggi, S.; Serio, F. Soilless Biofortification, Bioaccessibility, and Bioavailability: Signposts on the Path to Personalized Nutrition. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 966018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Imperio, M.; Parente, A.; Montesano, F. F.; Renna, M.; Logrieco, A. F.; Serio, F. Boron Biofortification of Portulaca oleracea L. through Soilless Cultivation for a New Tailored Crop. Agronomy 2020, 10(7), 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puccinelli, M.; Malorgio, F.; Rosellini, I.; Pezzarossa, B. Production of Selenium-Biofortified Microgreens from Selenium-Enriched Seeds of Basil. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99(12), 5601–5605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pannico, A.; El-Nakhel, C.; Graziani, G.; Kyriacou, M. C.; Giordano, M.; Soteriou, G. A.; Rouphael, Y. Selenium Biofortification Impacts the Nutritive Value, Polyphenolic Content, and Bioactive Constitution of Variable Microgreens Genotypes. Antioxidants 2020, 9(4), 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavan, M.; Wee, B.; Fuentes, S.; Pang, A.; Brodie, G.; Viejo, C. G.; Gupta, D. Biofortification of Kale Microgreens with Selenate-Selenium Using Two Delivery Methods: Selenium-Rich Soilless Medium and Foliar Application. Sci. Hortic. 2024, 323, 112522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheikhi, H.; Nicola, S.; Delshad, M.; Bulgari, R. Sodium Selenate Biofortification, through Seed Priming, on Dill Microgreens Grown in Two Different Cultivation Systems. Front. Plant Sci. 2024, 15, 1474420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Institute of Medicine (US) Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride; National Academies Press (US), 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiorentini, D.; Cappadone, C.; Farruggia, G.; Prata, C. Magnesium: Biochemistry, Nutrition, Detection, and Social Impact of Diseases Linked to Its Deficiency. Nutrients 2021, 13(4), 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DiNicolantonio, J. J.; O’Keefe, J. H.; Wilson, W. Subclinical Magnesium Deficiency: A Principal Driver of Cardiovascular Disease and a Public Health Crisis. Open Heart 2018, 5, e000668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louzada, M. L. C.; Martins, A. P. B.; Canella, D. S.; Baraldi, L. G.; Levy, R. B.; Claro, R. M.; Monteiro, C. A. Impact of Ultra-Processed Foods on Micronutrient Content in the Brazilian Diet. Rev. Saude Publica 2015, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaudhary, D. P.; Sharma, R.; Bansal, D. D. Implications of Magnesium Deficiency in Type 2 Diabetes: A Review. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2010, 134, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zbíral, J. Analýza Rostlinného Materiálu: Jednotné Pracovní Postupy; Ústřední kontrolní a zkušební ústav zemědělský: Brno, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Arya, S. P.; Mahajan, M.; Jain, P. Non-Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of Vitamin C. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000, 417, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zloch, Z.; Čelakovský, J.; Aujezdská, A. Stanovení Obsahu Polyfenolů a Celkové Antioxidační Kapacity v Potravinách Rostlinného Původu; Ústav Hygieny Lékařské Fakulty UK: Plzeň, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Blatny, P.; Kvasnicka, F.; Loucka, R.; Safarova, H. Determination of Ammonium, Calcium, Magnesium, and Potassium in Silage by Capillary Isotachophoresis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Gioia, F.; Hong, J. C.; Pisani, C.; Petropoulos, S. A.; Bai, J.; Rosskopf, E. N. Yield Performance, Mineral Profile, and Nitrate Content in a Selection of Seventeen Microgreen Species. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1220691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przybysz, A.; Wrochna, M.; Małecka-Przybysz, M.; Gawrońska, H.; Gawroński, S. W. The Effects of Mg Enrichment of Vegetable Sprouts on Mg Concentration, Yield and ROS Generation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 3469–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, F. H. Magnesium Deficiency and Increased Inflammation: Current Perspectives. J. Inflamm. Res. 2018, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, W.; Chen, S.; Hussain, N.; Cong, Y.; Liang, Z.; Chen, K. Magnesium Stress Signaling in Plant: Just a Beginning. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e992287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, R. J.; Luan, S. Regulation of Calcium and Magnesium Homeostasis in Plants: From Transporters to Signaling Network. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 39, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, R. J.; Zhao, F. G.; Garcia, V. J.; Kleist, T. J.; Yang, L.; Zhang, H. X.; Luan, S. Tonoplast CBL–CIPK Calcium Signaling Network Regulates Magnesium Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015, 112, 3134–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kathi, S.; Laza, H.; Singh, S.; Thompson, L.; Li, W.; Simpson, C. Vitamin C Biofortification of Broccoli Microgreens and Resulting Effects on Nutrient Composition. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1145992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrkić, R.; Benko, B.; Fabek Uher, S.; Šic Žlabur, J. Yield and Morphology of Mustard and Garden Cress Microgreens Grown under LED Supplemental Lighting. In IX South-Eastern Europe Symposium on Vegetables and Potatoes 2023, 1391, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koh, E.; Wimalasiri, K. M. S.; Chassy, A. W.; Mitchell, A. E. Content of Ascorbic Acid, Quercetin, Kaempferol and Total Phenolics in Commercial Broccoli. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2009, 22, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Z.; Rausch, S. R.; Luo, Y.; Sun, J.; Yu, L.; Wang, Q.; Stommel, J. R. Microgreens of Brassicaceae: Genetic Diversity of Phytochemical Concentrations and Antioxidant Capacity. LWT 2019, 101, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gokul, D.; Poonkodi, P.; Angayarkanni, A. Effect of Inorganic Fertilizers, Organic Manures, Biofertilizers and Magnesium Sulfate on Yield Attributes, Yield and Quality of Chilli. Int. J. Anal. Exp. Modal Anal. 2021, 13, 779–783. [Google Scholar]
- Malik, A. A.; Chattoo, M. A.; Sheemar, G.; Rashid, R. Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Sweet Pepper Hybrid SH-SP-5 (Capsicum annuum L.) as Affected by Integration of Inorganic Fertilizers and Organic Manures (FYM). J. Agric. Technol. 2011, 7, 1037–1048. [Google Scholar]
- Borowski, E.; Michalek, S. The Effect of Foliar Nutrition of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) with Magnesium Salts and Urea on Gas Exchange, Leaf Yield and Quality. Acta Agrobot. 2010, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yadav, L. P.; Koley, T. K.; Tripathi, A.; Singh, S. Antioxidant Potentiality and Mineral Content of Summer Season Leafy Greens: Comparison at Mature and Microgreen Stages Using Chemometric. Agric. Res. 2019, 8, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U.S. Department of Agriculture. FoodData Central: Cucumber, Raw. Available online: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/food-details/168409/nutrients (accessed on 15 December 2024).
- Naidu, K. A. Vitamin C in Human Health and Disease Is Still a Mystery? An Overview. Nutr. J. 2003, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.; Nandasiri, R.; Fadairo, O.; Eskin, N. M. Phenolics of Mustard Seeds: A Review on Composition, Processing Effect and Their Bioactivities. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2024, 101, 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xuan, T. D.; Huong, C. T.; Quan, N. V.; Anh, L. H.; Khanh, T. D.; Rayee, R. Improvement of Salinity Tolerance in Rice Seedlings by Exogenous Magnesium Sulfate Application. Soil Syst. 2022, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciscomani-Larios, J. P.; Sánchez-Chávez, E.; Jacobo-Cuellar, J. L.; Sáenz-Hidalgo, H. K.; Orduño-Cruz, N.; Cruz-Alvarez, O.; Ávila-Quezada, G. D. Biofortification Efficiency with Magnesium Salts on the Increase of Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity in Snap Beans. Ciênc. Rural 2021, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, V. T.; Nguyen, N. Q.; Thi, N. Q. N.; Thi, C. Q. N.; Truc, T. T.; Nghi, P. T. B. Studies on Chemical, Polyphenol Content, Flavonoid Content, and Antioxidant Activity of Sweet Basil Leaves (Ocimum basilicum L.). IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2021, 1092, 012083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghasemzadeh, A.; Ashkani, S.; Baghdadi, A.; Pazoki, A.; Jaafar, H. Z.; Rahmat, A. Improvement in Flavonoids and Phenolic Acids Production and Pharmaceutical Quality of Sweet Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) by Ultraviolet-B Irradiation. Molecules 2016, 21, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Bella, M. C.; Nicolosi, E.; Ballistreri, G.; Fabroni, S.; Gentile, C. Morphometric Characteristics, Polyphenols and Ascorbic Acid Variation in Brassica oleracea L. Novel Foods: Sprouts, Microgreens and Baby Leaves. Agronomy 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patras, A.; Stoleru, V.; Filimon, R. V.; Padureanu, S.; Chelariu, E. L.; Biliaderis, C. G. Influence of Sodium and Maturity Stage on the Antioxidant Properties of Cauliflower and Broccoli Sprouts. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2017, 45, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Common name | Scientific name | Determined TSW (g) | Density of seeds per tray (g) | Density of seeds per cm2 | Growing in the dark (day) | Light exposure (day) | Cultivation days (total) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cress | Lepidium sativum L. | 2.4 | 3 | 7.6 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Mustard | Sinapis alba L. | 5.8 | 7 | 7.3 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Broccoli | Brassica oleracea L. var. italica | 3.1 | 7 | 13.7 | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| Basil | Ocimum basilicum L. | 1.5 | 3 | 12.1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Sunflower | Helianthus annuus L. | 60.9 | 18 | 1.8 | 4 | 5 | 9 |
| Cucumber | Cucumis sativus L. | 22.8 | 6 | 1.6 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Treatment | Mg concentration (mg·L−1) | pH value | EC (µs·cm−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mg1 | 10 | 8.04 | 700 |
| Mg2 | 20 | 7.83 | 1210 |
| Mg3 | 30 | 7.66 | 1670 |
| Mg4 | 40 | 7.47 | 1990 |
| Mg5 | 50 | 7.20 | 2500 |
| Cultivated species | Cultivation days | Used amount of Mg (mg·L−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | ||
| Cress | 7 | 1.01 | 2.03 | 3.04 | 4.05 | 5.07 |
| Mustard | 6 | 0.74 | 1.48 | 2.22 | 2.95 | 3.69 |
| Broccoli | 10 | 1.20 | 2.40 | 3.61 | 4.80 | 6.01 |
| Basil | 6 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.50 |
| Sunflower | 9 | 1.11 | 2.23 | 3.35 | 4.45 | 5.57 |
| Cucumber | 11 | 1.97 | 3.93 | 5.90 | 7.86 | 9.82 |
| Treatment | Cress | Mustard | Broccoli | Basil | Sunflower | Cucumber |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 216.8 ±22.4d | 369.8 ±14.6d | 312.3 ±2.3d | 150.7 ±17.5e | 203.7 ±5.5c | 376.8 ±19.8e |
| Mg1 | 377.8 ±51.2cd | 389.8 ±21.7d | 404.4 ±10.6cd | 214.9 ±19.6d | 292.5 ±36.1ab | 491.4 ±6.9d |
| Mg2 | 366.5 ±7.0cd | 427.4 ±15.6cd | 476.5 ±24.5bc | 307.7 ±16.8c | 294.0 ±25.9ab | 683.4 ±18.5c |
| Mg3 | 451.8 ±38.9c | 493.9 ±15.1bc | 516.5 ±25.9bc | 393.8 ±65.8b | 307.5 ±7.3ab | 823.7 ±55.8ab |
| Mg4 | 533.1 ±39.3ab | 561.9 ±26.7ab | 581.0 ±19.5b | 379.6 ±17.3b | 276.9 ±10.8b | 850.9 ±122.9ab |
| Mg5 | 589.7 ±66.2ab | 616.8 ±13.4a | 724.2 ±38.3a | 545.8 ±57.0a | 368.5 ±18.1a | 1076.1 ±30.1a |
| Treatment | Cress | Mustard | Broccoli | Basil | Sunflower | Cucumber |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Mg1 | 74.23% | 5.40% | 26.75% | 42.61% | 43.62% | 30.42% |
| Mg2 | 69.01% | 15.57% | 49.29% | 104.21% | 44.34% | 81.37% |
| Mg3 | 108.36% | 33.56% | 61.83% | 161.28% | 50.97% | 118.62% |
| Mg4 | 145.82% | 61.49% | 81.14% | 151.85% | 35.97% | 125.85% |
| Mg5 | 171.96% | 66.78% | 136.93% | 262.18% | 80.92% | 185.59% |
| Treatment | Cress | Mustard | Broccoli | Basil | Sunflower | Cucumber |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 195.3 ±0.6ab | 162.6 ±6.9c | 125.1 ±6.8b | 158.8 ±24.5a | 118.2 ±2.7a | 199.5 ±16.2ab |
| Mg1 | 218.3 ±22.5ab | 161.7 ±5.2c | 132.6 ±5.1ab | 148.2 ±9.6a | 135.9 ±16.7a | 182.0 ±6.6b |
| Mg2 | 177.3 ±7.5b | 160.4 ±5.7c | 132.4 ±8.9ab | 158.2 ±10.8a | 116.3 ±10.5a | 225.9 ±3.2ab |
| Mg3 | 233.0 ±21.8ab | 204.2 ±4.1b | 130.8 ±4.0b | 166.3 ±21.6a | 125.0 ±2.7a | 241.6 ±12.8a |
| Mg4 | 272.0 ±25.6a | 227.8 ±9.4ab | 149.9 ±3.4ab | 136.6 ±8.4a | 107.0 ±7.5a | 232.9 ±20.1ab |
| Mg5 | 270.4 ±19.9a | 241.8 ±2.7a | 164.5 ±6.9a | 152.3 ±13.0a | 117.5 ±10.1a | 252.8 ±10.4a |
| Interspecies comparison of yield | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | FWY·gs−1 [g]* | Yield [g·m−2] | Edible part | FWY·gs−1 [g] | Yield [g·m−2] |
| Cress | 9.9 ±0.3b | 1805 ±53e | The entire part is edible | ||
| Mustard | 6.0 ±0.1c | 2547 ±49d | The entire part is edible | ||
| Broccoli | 7.7 ±0.1d | 3259 ±46c | 4.5 ±0.1b | 1925 ±22c | |
| Basil | 7.3 ±0.2d | 1318 ±27f | The entire part is edible | ||
| Sunflower | 4.5 ±0.1e | 4861 ±77a | 2.2 ±0.1c | 2341 ±72a | |
| Cucumber | 11.3 ±0.2a | 4114 ±73b | 5.8 ±0.1a | 2107 ±36b | |
| Species | Vitamin C [mg·kg−1 FW] | TAC DPPH [mg·kg−1 FW] | Flavonoids [mg·kg−1 FW] | Total phenols [mg·kg−1 FW] | Dry matter [%] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cress | 167.7 ±7.4c | 886.9 ±24.6b | 305.2 ±7.1d | 1909.7 ±68.5b | 7.9 ±0.2e |
| Mustard | 312.2 ±7.8b | 917.8 ±21.7b | 341.0 ±10.5c | 3445.5 ±102.1a | 9.7 ±0.2bc |
| Broccoli* | 748.4 ±6.5a | 997.9 ±8.2a | 353.9 ±5.4c | 1726.9 ±22.3c | 9.2 ±0.2cd |
| Basil | 43.3 ±2.0f | 571.6 ±23.2c | 528.9 ±30.0a | 1022.7 ±37.5d | 12.3 ±0.5a |
| Sunflower | 50.7 ±2.1e | 382.3 ±32.5d | 408.9 ±22.8b | 923.3 ±46.3e | 9.4 ±0.3bc |
| Cucumber | 75.8 ±2.5d | 152.8 ±6.1e | 147.7 ±4.2e | 661.8 ±14.8f | 9.2 ±0.2cd |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).