Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Salinity-Induced VOC Modulation and Physiological Adaptations in Adenosma indiana

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

22 February 2025

Posted:

24 February 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Saline environments shape plant metabolism, driving ecological and biochemical adaptations. This study investigated the impact of salinity on Adenosma indiana (Indian scent-wort), a medicinal herb known for its volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, to elucidate its adaptive strategies. During the flowering stage, samples were collected from four saline microhabitats in Kalasin Province, Thailand. We analyzed soil properties, plant growth, photosynthetic pigments, compatible solutes (anthocyanins, proline, total sugars), and ion concentrations (K, Na, Ca, Mg) across different tissues. Results showed that A. indiana maintained stable growth while enhancing chlorophyll and β-carotene levels under increasing salinity. GC-MS identified 47 VOCs, including 3-cyclopenten-1-one (first reported in this species) and β-bisabolene, both strongly linked to soil salinity. In low-salinity soils, leaves accumulated high sodium, inducing osmoprotectants (proline, total sugars) and VOCs (D-limonene, α-pinene, terpinolene, 1-octen-3-ol) in peltate glandular trichomes. Conversely, in high-salinity soils, lower leaf sodium levels were associated with increased β-bisabolene and β-caryophyllene production, suggesting distinct biochemical pathways. These findings reveal salinity-driven VOC modulation in A. indiana, highlighting its adaptive potential for medicinal applications in saline environments and its role as a source of salt-tolerant bioactive compounds.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Plants inhabiting saline environments face significant metabolic challenges, necessitating specialized adaptations to maintain growth and functionality. Many plants mitigate salt-induced stress by regulating ion homeostasis, optimizing photosynthetic processes, and enhancing the production of secondary metabolites, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs). VOCs play a dual role in bolstering plant resilience to environmental stressors and functioning as bioactive molecules with therapeutic potential [1,2,3]. In medicinal plants, VOCs such as terpenes and ketones contribute to antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities, highlighting their ecological and pharmacological importance [1,4,5].
Adenosma indiana (Lour.) Merr., commonly known as Indian scent-wort, is a Southeast Asian medicinal herb prized for its anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties. These therapeutic effects are attributed to its essential oils, which are rich in bioactive monoterpenes (e.g., α-limonene, fenchone, 1,8-cineole, terpinolene, α-pinene, and piperitenone oxide) and sesquiterpenes (e.g., cedrol, α-caryophyllene, and β-caryophyllene) [6,7,8,9,10]. Traditionally used in herbal remedies and skincare, these oils exhibit potent antioxidant, antibiotic, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities, making A. indiana valuable in traditional and modern medicinal applications [11,12].
Previous studies have shown that A. indiana thrives in saline environments, suggesting that salinity may enhance the production of key VOCs, such as D-limonene, contributing to its medicinal properties [13]. However, the mechanisms linking salinity to changes in VOC profiles and potential bioactivity in A. indiana remain insufficiently understood.
This study explores the adaptive responses of A. indiana to saline microhabitats, emphasizing how soil- and plant-accumulated salts affect growth, photosynthetic pigments, compatible solutes, and VOC synthesis within glandular trichomes. The primary aim is to evaluate how salinity influences the plant’s VOC profiles, providing insights into its ecological and biochemical adaptations. While some VOCs may hold medicinal relevance, the study focuses on understanding the broader relationship between salinity and changes in volatile emissions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site Selection and Experimental Design

This study was conducted in February 2024, during the flowering stage of A. indiana, at the previously investigated saline habitats of Khlong Kham (KK) (16°24’19.1”N, 103°17’10.6”E) and Hua Na Kham (HK) (16°23’52.4”N, 103°16’46.5”E) in Kalasin Province, Thailand (Figure 1). These sites, characterized by slightly to strongly saline soils, have a history of salt boiling and consistent salt precipitation on the soil surface. Each habitat was divided into two sub-sites (KK1, KK2, HK1, and HK2) to capture microenvironmental variability.
Within each sub-site, three 5 x 5 m quadrats were randomly selected to sample soil and plant material. From the seedling stage in July 2023 to flowering in February 2024, the region experienced an average maximum temperature of 34.34°C and a minimum of 19.29°C (data provided by the Upper Northeastern Meteorological Center, Thailand).

2.2. Soil Physicochemical Analysis

In each quadrat, ten soil samples were collected from 0 - 25 cm depth using a composite sampling method to ensure representative data. Soil moisture content and electrical conductivity of saturated soil extracts (ECe) were measured following the guidelines of the Land Development Department [14,15]. Soil moisture was determined by drying samples at 105°C to a constant weight. Soil pH and ECe were measured by saturating soil samples with distilled water and obtaining pH and ECe values using a pH meter and EC meter, respectively.
Soil organic matter (SOM) content was assessed using the Walkley-Black method [16] to provide insights into soil fertility. Soil ion concentrations (K, Na, Ca, and Mg) and the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) were analyzed according to Land Development Department guidelines [14]. Ions were extracted using ammonium acetate and quantified by atomic absorption spectroscopy (Agilent 200 Series 280FSAA). Chloride levels were determined using the Mohr titration, following Sheen and Kahler [17].

2.3. Plant Sample Collection and Preparation

Plant samples were collected from the quadrats and divided into three sections: (i) fresh specimens were prepared for identification and cataloged at Chulalongkorn University’s Professor Kasin Suvatabhundbu Herbarium (BCU) under the code A 17735 BCU; (ii) fresh samples were set aside for measurements of plant growth and ion concentrations in plant tissues; and (iii) fresh leaves were prepared for analyses of photosynthetic pigments, compatible solutes, glandular trichome morphology and density, and VOCs. For VOC analysis, fresh leaves were dried at 40°C and stored in airtight containers to preserve volatile compounds until further processing.

2.4. Plant Growth Analysis

To evaluate plant growth, stem height and leaf area were randomly measured, and fresh and dry weights were recorded for each sample to calculate biomass percentage. These metrics provided a basis for assessing growth responses to salinity conditions in each habitat.

2.5. Ion Concentration Analysis in Plant Tissues

Dried plant samples were separated into roots, stems, leaves, and inflorescences to assess ion accumulation in response to soil salinity. Each tissue type was digested in a nitric and perchloric acid solution following AOAC Official Method 975.03 [18]. Ion concentrations were then determined using atomic absorption spectroscopy (Agilent 200 Series 280FSAA), providing insights into the plant’s ion regulation mechanisms under saline conditions.

2.6. Photosynthetic Pigment Analysis

Photosynthetic pigments, including chlorophyll and β-carotene, were analyzed following the method of Costache et al. [19] to assess plant responses to salinity. Leaf samples were ground and extracted with an 80% acetone solution at a plant-to-solvent ratio 1:50 (w/v). The absorbance of the pigment extract was measured at wavelengths 470, 645, and 662 nm using a spectrophotometer. Pigment concentrations were calculated using the following equations:
Chlorophyll a = 11.75A662 - 2.35A645,
Chlorophyll b = 18.61A645 - 3.96A662,
Total chlorophyll = 7.79A662 + 16.26A645,
β-carotene = ((1,000A470 - 2.27Chl.a - 81.4Chl.b))/227,

2.7. Compatible Solute Analysis

Compatible solutes, anthocyanins, proline, and total sugar, were quantified to evaluate osmotic stress tolerance and antioxidative responses in A. indiana leaves under varying salinity levels. Anthocyanin concentration was determined by the pH differential method according to AOAC Official Method 2005.02 [20], with absorbance readings at 520 and 700 nm. Proline content was measured following the acid ninhydrin method of Bates et al. [21], where samples were reacted with acid ninhydrin and glacial acetic acid, heated, and absorbance was measured at 520 nm. Total sugars were quantified using the phenol-sulfuric acid [22], with absorbance recorded at 490 nm.

2.8. Morphological Characterization and Density Analysis of Glandular Trichomes

To investigate the morphology, density, and index of glandular trichomes on A. indiana leaves, samples from each sub-site were divided into two groups for distinct preparations. The first group was prepared for scanning electron microscopy (SEM; HITACHI TM4000 Plus) to observe detailed trichome morphology. Dried samples were sputter-coated with a thin layer of gold and examined under SEM to capture high-resolution images of trichome structures.
The second group was prepared for light microscopy, following a protocol similar to our previous study. Briefly, leaf samples were treated with 5% potassium hydroxide and 5% sodium hypochlorite to clear the epidermis, stained with 1% safranin, and dehydrated with ethanol. This allowed visualization of the capitate and peltate trichomes on both the adaxial (upper) and abaxial (lower) surfaces, enabling trichome density and index calculations [23]. The trichome index (%) was calculated as follows:
Trichome index (%) = (T/(T+E)) x 100,
where T is the number of trichome cells mm-2, E is the number of epidermal cells mm-2.

2.9. VOCs Extraction and Analysis

VOCs in A. indiana leaves were analyzed using headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Leaf samples (0.2 g) were pre-incubated at 60°C for 5 min, then extracted with a 50/30 µm DVB/CAR/PDMS SPME fiber at 60°C for 15 min and desorbed at 250°C for 5 min.
The analysis was performed on an Agilent 7890A GC with an HP-5MS column (30 m x 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm film thickness) and an Agilent 7000B MS. The carrier gas (helium) flowed at 0.8 mL min-1. The oven program started at 40°C, increased to 150°C at 3°C min-1, and then to 250°C at 20°C min-1 with a 5 min hold (total runtime: 46 min). Mass spectrometry was conducted in electron ionization (EI) mode at 70 eV, scanning from 35 to 500 amu. VOCs were identified using the NIST MS Search 2.0 library.

2.10. Statistical Analyses

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 29.0.0.0 (241). Statistical tests included one-way ANOVA to compare soil properties, morphological traits, photosynthetic pigments, and compatible solutes across the sampling plots. Also, two-way ANOVA was conducted to assess plant ion concentrations and trichome density by plant parts, followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test for post-hoc comparisons (p-value < 0.05). Pearson correlation was used to analyze pairwise associations, while Principal Component Analysis (PCA) explored multivariate correlations between soil and plant variables, including VOCs. Factor loadings in PCA were rotated using the Varimax method with Kaiser normalization. Additionally, K-means clustering was applied to group variables for PCA plotting.

3. Results

3.1. Soil Physicochemical Properties

A one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences (P < 0.001) in all soil physicochemical properties between the KK and HK habitats (Table 1). Soil moisture content was notably higher in HK soils, particularly in HK2, where it was nearly three times greater than in KK soils (F3,32 = 3573.46, P < 0.001). Soil pH in both habitats was slightly acidic, with KK soils exhibiting significantly lower values than HK (F3,32 = 40.77, P < 0.001). SOM was also elevated in HK soils, especially in HK2, where it exceeded KK levels by approximately 1.5 times (F3,32 = 24.46, P < 0.001). Salinity-related parameters, including ECe, Na, Ca, and SAR, were significantly higher in HK soils (F3,32 = 1528.34 to 20094.46, P < 0.001). Notably, sodium concentrations were highest in HK2 (71.47 mmol kg⁻¹), surpassing KK soils by a factor of 5 to 7 (F3,32 = 20144.72, P < 0.001). These findings indicate that HK soils, particularly HK2, exhibit significantly higher moisture, SOM, and salinity-related properties compared to KK soils.

3.2. Plant Growth, Photosynthetic Pigments, and Compatible Solutes

Salinity stress significantly influenced A. indiana biomass (F3,32 = 7.136, P = 0.001) and leaf area (F3,32 = 3.566, P = 0.025), though no significant effect was observed on stem height (Table 2). Photosynthetic pigment concentrations varied significantly across sites (F3,32 = 84.133 to 301.592, P < 0.001), with the highest levels of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and β-carotene recorded in HK2. Similarly, the concentrations of leaf-compatible solutes varied significantly among sites (F3,32 = 22.824 to 470.778, P < 0.001), with KK1 exhibiting the highest levels of anthocyanins, proline, and total sugars.

3.3. Salt Ion Accumulation in Plants

A two-way ANOVA indicated significant variation in salt ion concentrations across sites and plant parts, with significant effects of location (F3,128 = 44352.61, P < 0.001), ion type (F3,128 = 503.20, P < 0.001), and their interactions (F9,128 = 4117.68, P < 0.001) (Figure 2a). KK2 plants exhibited the highest accumulation of K (558.32 mmol kg⁻¹ DW), Na (679.51 mmol kg⁻¹ DW), and Ca (506.55 mmol kg⁻¹ DW), whereas HK1 plants had the highest Mg uptake (457.29 mmol kg⁻¹ DW).
Potassium concentrations differed significantly by sites and plant parts (F3,128 = 1046.01 to 3893.84, P < 0.001) (Figure 2b). The highest K levels were recorded in KK2 roots (222.84 mmol kg⁻¹ DW), whereas the lowest levels were observed in KK1 inflorescences and HK2 roots. Leaves generally contained more K than stems, peaking at 159.67 mmol kg⁻¹ DW in HK1.
Sodium concentrations also varied significantly (F3,128 = 658.16 to 6536.40, P < 0.001) (Figure 2c). The highest Na accumulation occurred in KK2 roots (260.73 mmol kg⁻¹ DW), while in HK1 and HK2, Na concentrations were greater in inflorescences.
Calcium accumulation was significantly influenced by sites and plant parts (F3,128 = 662.80 to 3724.85, P < 0.001) (Figure 2d). KK plants exhibited higher Ca levels in roots and stems but significantly lower levels in leaves and inflorescences, whereas HK plants showed the opposite trend.
Magnesium concentrations also showed site- and plant part-specific variation (F3,128 = 1563.48 to 3019.03, P < 0.001) (Figure 2e). Leaves and inflorescences generally exhibited higher Mg levels, except in KK2, where distribution was relatively uniform.
The K/Na ratio, a key indicator of salt tolerance, was significantly influenced by sites and plant parts (F3,128 = 88.20 to 400.27, P < 0.001) (Figure 2f). HK1 leaves exhibited the highest K/Na ratio (2.37), indicating superior salt tolerance.

3.4. Glandular Trichome Density

Two types of glandular trichomes were identified in A. indiana leaves: capitate and peltate (Figure 3). Capitate trichomes, similar in size to stomata (10–50 µm), were found on both leaf surfaces, while larger peltate trichomes (90–200 µm) were restricted to the abaxial surface. The highest capitate trichome density was observed on the abaxial surface at KK2 (10.56 mm-2), while the lowest density occurred on the adaxial surface at KK1 (2.11 mm⁻²). Peltate trichomes, which were confined to the abaxial surface, were most abundant at KK1 (4.78 mm-2). Site, leaf surface, and their interaction significantly influenced trichome density (P < 0.001), though peltate trichome distribution was predominantly determined by leaf surface (F1,64 = 226.78, P < 0.001).

3.5. Leaf VOC Analysis

Headspace SPME GC-MS analysis identified 47 VOCs in A. indiana leaves (Table 3). VOC composition varied across sites, with HK1 and KK1 exhibiting the greatest diversity. Fewer compounds were detected in HK2 and KK2, with four absent from their profiles. Among the six VOC categories, ketones were most abundant, while monoterpenes exhibited the highest diversity. Thirteen VOCs had peak areas exceeding 1%, including α-pinene, D-limonene, terpinolene, fenchone, p-cymen-8-ol, β-elemene, β-caryophyllene, α-caryophyllene, β-bisabolene, chrysanthenone, 3-cyclopenten-1-one, 1-octen-3-ol, and 2-chloro-1-ethyl-5-methoxy-3-methylbenzene.

3.6. Correlation and PCA of Plant-Soil Interactions

Correlation and PCA analyses (Figure 4) revealed significant relationships among soil properties, compatible solutes, sodium contents, glandular trichome density, and the top 13 VOCs in A. indiana. Soil pH correlated positively with fenchone (r = 0.98, P = 0.02), while soil ECe was associated with β-bisabolene (r = 0.96, P = 0.04). Soil potassium showed a perfect positive correlation with p-cymen-8-ol (r = 1.00, P < 0.001). In contrast, soil calcium exhibited a significant negative correlation with α-caryophyllene (r = -0.96, P = 0.04). Proline correlated positively with α-pinene and D-limonene (r = 0.96, P = 0.04) but negatively with β-bisabolene (r = -0.98, P = 0.02). Additionally, plant sodium positively correlated with β-elemene (r = 0.96, P = 0.04), while leaf sodium content exhibited a strong negative correlation with a ketone derivative (r = -0.99, P = 0.01). Glandular trichomes played a key role in VOC modulation, with abaxial peltate trichome density positively associated with D-limonene, terpinolene, α-pinene, and 1-octen-3-ol (r = 0.98–1.00, P ≤ 0.02), indicating their involvement in salinity-induced VOC synthesis.
PCA explained 85.75% of the total variance, categorizing the data into three clusters: (1) Monoterpenes associated with osmoprotectants, abaxial trichomes, and leaf sodium levels, (2) Sesquiterpenes linked to capitate trichomes and plant sodium levels, and (3) Monoterpenoids, a sesquiterpene, a sesquiterpenoid, and a ketone influenced by soil properties. These findings underscore the complex interplay between salinity stress, secondary metabolite production, and plant structural adaptations in A. indiana.

4. Discussion

Our study reveals significant effects of salinity on the VOC profiles of A. indiana leaves. We identified 47 VOCs, some of which overlap with, and others diverge from, the 49 VOCs previously reported in A. indiana from Southern China [10]. Among the unique VOCs identified, 3-cyclopenten-1-one, found in high concentrations (34.98% - 44.04%), appears to play a crucial role in the plant’s response to salinity stress. Similarly, 1-octen-3-ol, a VOC linked to plant defense mechanisms [24], was prominent. Another noteworthy compound, 4,7-dimethyl-benzofuran, previously identified in Radix Paeoniae Rubra [25], has known antibacterial, antimicrobial, antitumor, antidiabetic, and anti-inflammatory properties [26,27]. Other VOCs such as dodecane and 2-cyclohexen-1-one may contribute to structural or protective adaptations in A. indiana under salinity stress [28,29]. Additionally, replicated VOCs such as D-limonene (7.27% - 21.44%) and fenchone (2.54% - 6.63%) were abundant and biologically active, playing essential roles in ecological interactions and stress responses [10]. Compounds like β-caryophyllene and α-caryophyllene, known for their anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, further emphasize the pharmacological potential of A. indiana [30,31]. These findings indicate that environmental factors, especially salinity, strongly influence the plant’s biochemical profile, with implications for both ecological adaptation and pharmacological applications.
A strong correlation between VOC profiles and soil salinity suggests that environmental factors can be manipulated to optimize VOC production in A. indiana for medicinal purposes. For instance, D-limonene, which was elevated under low-salinity conditions, has previously been shown to inhibit tumor growth by reducing cyclin D1 expression, a key regulator in cancer progression, and to accumulate in breast tissue to suppress proliferation [32]. Similarly, β-bisabolene, which accounted for 12.85% - 24.50% of the VOCs in A. indiana (Table 3), was more abundant under high-salinity conditions. Although its pharmacological effects were not the focus of this study, β-bisabolene has demonstrated anti-adipogenic and antibacterial activities in Colquhounia coccinea var. mollis [33]. The presence of these bioactive compounds in salinity-stressed environments underscores the potential of manipulating environmental factors like soil salinity to enhance the production of pharmacologically relevant VOCs. These findings provide a foundation for further research on the relationship between salinity stress and VOC biosynthesis, with potential ecological and medicinal applications.
A novel finding in our study is the role of sodium accumulation in activating VOC production. Specifically, monoterpenes such as D-limonene, α-pinene, and terpinolene, along with alcohols like 1-octen-3-ol, were activated in response to sodium accumulation in leaves. Interestingly, plants from low-salinity soils showed higher sodium concentrations in leaves compared to those from high-salinity soils, where VOCs such as 3-cyclopenten-1-one and sesquiterpenes like β-bisabolene responded more strongly. This suggests that sodium dynamics vary across habitats, potentially influencing the VOC profiles in ways that may have ecological or pharmacological significance.
Salinity stress induces changes in VOC production as part of broader plant defense mechanisms against environmental stressors. In response to sodium chloride stress, many plants increase the production of hydrophilic volatiles while reducing specific terpenoids [34]. A similar response has been observed in Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), where salinity triggers the production of monoterpenes such as (Z)-β-ocimene, 2-carene, and β-phellandrene [35]. These findings align with our study, where salinity-induced changes in VOC production in A. indiana underscore the ecological role of these compounds in plant adaptation to saline environments.
Our observations suggest that VOC production in A. indiana is linked to the activity of peltate trichomes, predominantly found on the abaxial leaf surface. These trichomes are responsible for producing higher amounts of key VOCs, such as D-limonene and 1-octen-3-ol (Figure 4). In contrast, capitate trichomes, which are present on both leaf surfaces, did not show a strong association with specific VOCs. This functional differentiation underscores the specialization of peltate trichomes in VOC synthesis and their potential role in mitigating environmental stress.
In response to salinity stress, osmotic regulation appears to be the primary defense strategy in A. indiana leaves, as evidenced by the strong correlations between osmoprotectants such as proline and total sugars and the production of specific VOCs (e.g., D-limonene, α-pinene, terpinolene, and 1-octen-3-ol). In contrast, antioxidants like anthocyanins show weaker correlations with VOC production (Figure 4). This suggests that osmotic regulation, through the accumulation of proline and sugars, plays a dominant role in maintaining cellular homeostasis under sodium stress.
Proline and sugars function as osmoprotectants by stabilizing cell membranes, maintaining osmotic balance, and limiting oxidative damage under salt stress [36]. The increased expression of Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthase (P5CS) in response to salinity enhances proline production, which helps maintain osmotic balance and reduces reactive oxygen species (ROS), thereby protecting cellular structures [37]. While anthocyanins contribute to scavenging ROS, their role in A. indiana appears secondary to osmotic regulation, as indicated by the red-to-violet pigmentation observed in leaves under salinity stress (Figure 1d).
Salinity stress induces significant metabolic shifts, including the accumulation of sugars such as glucose, fructose, and sucrose, which serve as osmoprotectants in many species, including mint [38]. These sugars help maintain osmotic balance, shielding plants from the adverse effects of salt stress. Beyond sugar accumulation, trehalose plays a crucial role by stabilizing cell membranes, reinforcing cell walls, and maintaining ionic homeostasis. It also aids in protein stabilization, scavenges ROS, and upregulates salt-responsive genes, thereby enhancing the plant’s overall salt tolerance [39]. The multifaceted role of trehalose underscores its importance in enabling plants to cope with osmotic and oxidative stress during salinity challenges.
Despite the challenges posed by salinity, A. indiana remains resilient in maintaining biomass and stem height, even with altered photosynthetic pigment levels (Table 2). This is consistent with findings in salt-tolerant species, such as wild-type Rudna tomato, which maintains photosynthetic efficiency despite high salinity levels [35]. In A. indiana, sodium compartmentalization in less metabolically active tissues, such as aerial parts, likely helps protect core metabolic processes, allowing the plant to preserve growth under salinity stress.
Additionally, elevated calcium levels were observed in response to salt stress, particularly in the leaves and inflorescences of A. indiana at HK sites (Figure 2d). This suggests activation of Salt Overly Sensitive (SOS) pathways, where calcium signaling plays a crucial role in expelling sodium from cells to maintain ion homeostasis [40]. The involvement of SOS3 and SOS2 in this calcium-mediated response aligns with previous studies [41], though further gene-level research is needed to confirm these findings.

5. Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that A. indiana employs a strategy to adapt to salinity stress, combining osmotic adjustments with VOCs emission. Under conditions of low salinity but high sodium accumulation in leaves, VOCs such as D-limonene, α-pinene, terpinolene, and 1-octen-3-ol are predominantly produced, driven by the accumulation of osmoprotectants like proline and sugars. These compounds stabilize cellular structures and support growth resilience. Conversely, in high-salinity environments with lower sodium accumulation in leaves, VOCs like β-bisabolene and β-caryophyllene synthesis are stimulated. This shift indicates that sodium levels differentially influence VOC pathways, shaping habitat-specific biochemical profiles to optimize stress adaptation.
The study also underscores the role of peltate trichomes in facilitating VOC production, particularly in synthesizing bioactive monoterpenes, which could have medicinal and ecological implications. The observed elevation in calcium levels under salt stress indicates a probable role for the SOS pathway in ion homeostasis. However, further molecular studies are needed to confirm this mechanism.
This research provides novel insights into the ecological adaptations and pharmacological potential of A. indiana in saline environments, emphasizing how environmental factors shape VOC profiles in halophyte and glycophyte species. These insights pave the way for sustainable applications of VOCs from salinity-tolerant medicinal plants, which are increasingly relevant in light of global soil salinization challenges.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M., W.L. and P.K.; methodology, W.L.; validation, J.M.; formal analysis, P.K.; investigation, W.L.; writing—original draft preparation, P.K.; writing—review and editing, W.L. and P.K.; visualization, J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research project was financially supported by Mahasarakham University.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their appreciation to the undergraduate students for their valuable assistance in the laboratory.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ECe Electrical conductivity of saturated soil extract
HK Hua Na Kham
KK Khlong Kham
PCA Principal Component Analysis
SAR Sodium adsorption ratio
SOM Soil organic matter
SOS Salt Overly Sensitive
VOCs Volatile organic compounds

References

  1. Chrysargyris, A.; Tzionis, A.; Xylia, P.; Tzortzakis, N. Effects of salinity on tagetes growth, physiology, and shelf life of edible flowers stored in passive modified atmosphere packaging or treated with ethanol. Front Plant Sci 2018, 9, 1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Negrão, S.; Schmöckel, S.M.; Tester, M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann Bot 2017, 119, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ullah, A.; Li, M.; Noor, J.; Tariq, A.; Liu, Y.; Shi, L. Effects of salinity on photosynthetic traits, ion homeostasis and nitrogen metabolism in wild and cultivated soybean. PeerJ 2019, 7, e8191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Midzi, J.; Jeffery, D.W.; Baumann, U.; Rogiers, S.; Tyerman, S.D.; Pagay, V. Stress-induced volatile emissions and signaling in inter-plant communication. Plants 2022, 11, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nazari, M.; Ghasemi-Soloklui, A.A.; Kordrostami, M.; Abdel Latef, A.A.H. Deciphering the response of medicinal plants to abiotic stressors: A focus on drought and salinity. Plant Stress 2023, 10, 100255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dai, D.N.; Thang, T.D.; Thai, T.H.; Ogunwande, I.A. Chemical constituents of leaf essential oils of four Scrophulariaceae species grown in Vietnam. J Essent Oil Res 2015, 27, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ya, Q.K.; Lu, W.J.; Chen, J.Y.; Tan, X. GC-MS analysis of the chemical constituent of volatile oil from Zhuang drug Adenosma indianum (Lour.) Merr. Chin. J. Pharm. Anal. 2011, 31, 544–546. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Q.; Qi, J.; Zhuang, H.; Gou, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, Y. A review of the aromatic genus Adenosma: Geographical distribution, traditional uses, phytochemistry and biological activities. J Ethnopharmacol 2021, 275, 114075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, H.; Huai-en, W.; Zhi-ying, W.; Yan-fen, X.; Xiao-ling, Y. Chemical constituents and anti-bacterial activity of essential oil from Adenosma indianum. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae 2011, 79–82. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zeng, Z.; Meng, C.; Ye, X.; Zeng, Z. Analysis of volatile components of Adenosma indianum (Lour.) Merr. by steam distillation and headspace solid-phase microextraction. J Chem 2012, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jennings, M.R.; Parks, R.J. Curcumin as an antiviral agent. Viruses 2020, 12, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kashyap, N.; Kumari, A.; Raina, N.; Zakir, F.; Gupta, M. Prospects of essential oil loaded nanosystems for skincare. Phytomed. Plus 2022, 2, 100198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Laojinda, W.; Khanema, P. Saline soil adaptations of Kratai Cham (Adenosma indianum (Lour.) Merr.): A comprehensive study on life cycle, leaf epidermis, and FTIR analysis of essential oils. Food Agric Sci and Technol 2024, 10, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  14. Land Development Department. Handbook of soil chemical analysis; Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives: Thailand, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  15. Land Development Department. Handbook of soil physical analysis; Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives: Thailand, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sheen, H.T.; Kahler, H.L. Effect of ions on Mohr method for chloride determination. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed 1938, 10, 628–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Isaac, R.A. Plants. In Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th ed.; Helrich, K., Ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Virginia, USA, 1990; 1, pp. 42.
  19. Costache, M.A.; Campeanu, G.; Neata, G. Studies concerning the extraction of chlorophyll and total carotenoids from vegetables. Rom Biotechnol Lett 2012, 17, 7702–7708. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, J.; Durst, R.W.; Wrolstad, R.E. Determination of total monomeric anthocyanin pigment content of fruit juices, beverages, natural colorants, and wines by the pH differential method: Collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2005, 88, 1269–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. DuBois, M.; Gilles, K.A.; Hamilton, J.K.; Rebers, P.A.; Smith, F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 1956, 28, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dilcher, D.L. Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Bot Rev 1974, 40, 1–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tonks, A.J.; Roberts, J.M.; Midthassel, A.; Pope, T. Exploiting volatile organic compounds in crop protection: A systematic review of 1-octen-3-ol and 3-octanone. Ann Appl Biol 2023, 183, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, X.; Lan, Z.; Liang, Y. Analysis of volatile chemical components of Radix Paeoniae Rubra by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and chemometric resolution. J Cent South Univ of Technol 2007, 14, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Heravi, M.M.; Zadsirjan, V.; Hamidi, H.; Tabar Amiri, P.H. Total synthesis of natural products containing benzofuran rings. RSC Adv 2017, 7, 24470–24521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khatana, K.; Gupta, A. An update on natural occurrence and biological activity of benzofurans. Act Scie Medic Sci 2020, 4, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jishma, P.; Hussain, N.; Chellappan, R.; Rajendran, R.; Mathew, J.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Strain-specific variation in plant growth promoting volatile organic compounds production by five different Pseudomonas spp. as confirmed by response of Vigna radiata seedlings. J Appl Microbiol 2017, 123, 204–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kalstabakken, K.A.; Harned, A.M. Asymmetric transformations of achiral 2,5-cyclohexadienones. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 9571–9585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bina, F.; Soleymani, S.; Toliat, T.; Hajimahmoodi, M.; Tabarrai, M.; Abdollahi, M.; Rahimi, R. Plant-derived medicines for treatment of endometriosis: A comprehensive review of molecular mechanisms. Pharmacol Res 2019, 139, 76–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Paula-Freire, L.I.G.; Andersen, M.L.; Gama, V.S.; Molska, G.R.; Carlini, E.L.A. The oral administration of trans-caryophyllene attenuates acute and chronic pain in mice. Phytomedicine 2014, 21, 356–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chebet, J.J.; Ehiri, J.E.; McClelland, D.J.; Taren, D.; Hakim, I.A. Effect of d-limonene and its derivatives on breast cancer in human trials: A scoping review and narrative synthesis. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, D.-S.; Shi, L.-L.; Guo, K.; Luo, S.-H.; Liu, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-G.; Liu, Y.; Li, S.-H. A new sesquiterpene synthase catalyzing the formation of (R)-β-bisabolene from medicinal plant Colquhounia coccinea var. mollis and its anti-adipogenic and antibacterial activities. Phytochem 2023, 211, 113681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Saberi Riseh, R.; Ebrahimi-Zarandi, M.; Tamanadar, E.; Moradi Pour, M.; Thakur, V.K. Salinity stress: Toward sustainable plant strategies and using plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria encapsulation for reducing it. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tomescu, D.; Şumălan, R.; Copolovici, L.; Copolovici, D. The influence of soil salinity on volatile organic compounds emission and photosynthetic parameters of Solanum lycopersicum L. varieties. Open Life Sci 2017, 12, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mohammadi Alagoz, S.; Asgari Lajayer, B.; Ghorbanpour, M. Proline and soluble carbohydrates biosynthesis and their roles in plants under abiotic stresses. In Plant Stress Mitigators; Ghorbanpour, M., Shahid, M.A. Eds.; Elsevier, 2023; pp 169–185. [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, D.; Ni, R.; Yang, S.; Pu, Y.; Qian, M.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Y. Functional characterization of the Stipa purpurea P5CS gene under drought stress conditions. Int J Mol Sci 2021, 22, 9599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumar, D.; Punetha, A.; Chauhan, A.; Suryavanshi, P.; Padalia, R.C.; Kholia, S.; Singh, S. Growth, oil and physiological parameters of three mint species grown under saline stress levels. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 2023, 29, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sarkar, A.K.; Sadhukhan, S. Imperative role of trehalose metabolism and trehalose-6-phosphate signaling on salt stress responses in plants. Physiol Plant 2022, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ketehouli, T.; Idrice Carther, K.F.; Noman, M.; Wang, F.-W.; Li, X.-W.; Li, H.-Y. Adaptation of plants to salt stress: Characterization of Na+ and K+ transporters and role of CBL gene family in regulating salt stress response. Agronomy 2019, 9, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, J.; Zhu, J.-K. A calcium sensor homolog required for plant salt tolerance. Science 1998, 280, 1943–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The locations of the study sites (a) and the topography of Khlong Kham (KK) (b) and Hua Na Kham (HK) (c). The depiction includes Adenosma indiana in fresh and dried plants (d-e).
Figure 1. The locations of the study sites (a) and the topography of Khlong Kham (KK) (b) and Hua Na Kham (HK) (c). The depiction includes Adenosma indiana in fresh and dried plants (d-e).
Preprints 150286 g001
Figure 2. Salt ion contents in an entire plant and different parts of A. indiana: total salt ions in an entire plant (a), potassium (b), sodium (c), calcium (d), magnesium (e), and K/Na ratio (f). Data are presented as means ± S.D.; n = 9. Different uppercase letters denote significant differences between groups, and different lowercase letters denote significant differences within groups at a p-value of < 0.05.
Figure 2. Salt ion contents in an entire plant and different parts of A. indiana: total salt ions in an entire plant (a), potassium (b), sodium (c), calcium (d), magnesium (e), and K/Na ratio (f). Data are presented as means ± S.D.; n = 9. Different uppercase letters denote significant differences between groups, and different lowercase letters denote significant differences within groups at a p-value of < 0.05.
Preprints 150286 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of glandular trichomes on the abaxial surface of A. indiana leaves (a-d), with capitate trichome densities (e) and indices (f), and peltate trichome densities (g) and indices (h) on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. The images, captured using a stereomicroscope (a), compound microscope (b), and SEM (c-d), highlight capitate trichomes (Cap), peltate trichomes (Pel), and stomata (S). Data represent means ± S.D.; n = 9. Different uppercase letters denote significant differences between groups, and different lowercase letters denote significant differences within groups at a p-value of < 0.05.
Figure 3. Distribution of glandular trichomes on the abaxial surface of A. indiana leaves (a-d), with capitate trichome densities (e) and indices (f), and peltate trichome densities (g) and indices (h) on both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces. The images, captured using a stereomicroscope (a), compound microscope (b), and SEM (c-d), highlight capitate trichomes (Cap), peltate trichomes (Pel), and stomata (S). Data represent means ± S.D.; n = 9. Different uppercase letters denote significant differences between groups, and different lowercase letters denote significant differences within groups at a p-value of < 0.05.
Preprints 150286 g003
Figure 4. Correlation Heat Map and PCA Biplots for the top thirteen VOCs (with > 1% peak areas) in A. indiana leaves from KK and HK. Panel a shows the correlation heat map, while Panels b and c illustrate PCA biplots from the same PCA analysis but are separated for better visualization. Panel b focuses on the clustering of VOCs, while Panel c highlights soil properties, plant sodium content, compatible solutes, and trichome densities. Key variables analyzed include volatile organic compounds like 3-cyclopenten-1-one, and 2-chloro-1-ethyl-5-methoxy-3-methylbenzene; compatible solutes such as anthocyanins (antho), proline (pro), and total sugars (sug); density of glandular trichomes categorized as abaxial capitate (Lcap), abaxial peltate (Lpel), and adaxial capitate (Ucap); and various soil and plant metrics, encompassing electrical conductivity of saturated soil extract (ECe), soil moisture (moist), pH, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), soil organic matter (SOM), and soil minerals like calcium (SCa), chloride (SCl), potassium (SK), magnesium (SMg), and sodium (SNa). Sodium content is detailed across different plant parts, including roots (RNa), stems (StNa), leaves (LNa), inflorescences (InNa), and the entire plant (EnNa).
Figure 4. Correlation Heat Map and PCA Biplots for the top thirteen VOCs (with > 1% peak areas) in A. indiana leaves from KK and HK. Panel a shows the correlation heat map, while Panels b and c illustrate PCA biplots from the same PCA analysis but are separated for better visualization. Panel b focuses on the clustering of VOCs, while Panel c highlights soil properties, plant sodium content, compatible solutes, and trichome densities. Key variables analyzed include volatile organic compounds like 3-cyclopenten-1-one, and 2-chloro-1-ethyl-5-methoxy-3-methylbenzene; compatible solutes such as anthocyanins (antho), proline (pro), and total sugars (sug); density of glandular trichomes categorized as abaxial capitate (Lcap), abaxial peltate (Lpel), and adaxial capitate (Ucap); and various soil and plant metrics, encompassing electrical conductivity of saturated soil extract (ECe), soil moisture (moist), pH, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), soil organic matter (SOM), and soil minerals like calcium (SCa), chloride (SCl), potassium (SK), magnesium (SMg), and sodium (SNa). Sodium content is detailed across different plant parts, including roots (RNa), stems (StNa), leaves (LNa), inflorescences (InNa), and the entire plant (EnNa).
Preprints 150286 g004
Table 1. Soil physicochemical properties in four saline microhabitats.
Table 1. Soil physicochemical properties in four saline microhabitats.
Soil properties KK1 KK2 HK1 HK2
Moisture (%) 7.62 ± 0.15C1 6.54 ± 0.16D 11.47 ± 0.02B 18.96 ± 0.61A
pH 6.66 ± 0.01D 6.76 ± 0.06C 6.83 ± 0.05B 6.88 ± 0.07A
SOM (%) 1.58 ± 0.11C 1.64 ± 0.29C 2.14 ± 0.22B 2.40 ± 0.40A
ECe (dS m-1) 0.51 ± 0.01D 1.06 ± 0.03C 1.13 ± 0.05B 1.71 ± 0.04A
K (mmol kg-1) 1.34 ± 0.01D 1.94 ± 0.01C 13.96 ± 0.18A 6.97 ± 0.17B
Na (mmol kg-1) 15.79 ± 0.03C 10.39 ± 0.52D 51.84 ± 0.02B 71.47 ± 0.26A
Ca (mmol kg-1) 13.41 ± 0.16B 8.98 ± 0.22D 19.68 ± 0.24A 11.66 ± 0.28C
Mg (mmol kg-1) 10.49 ± 0.21D 31.21 ± 0.11A 16.13 ± 0.21B 15.56 ± 0.07C
Cl (mmol kg-1) 10.47 ± 0.99D 29.87 ± 1.42A 20.33 ± 0.42C 22.47 ± 0.70B
SAR 4.57 ± 0.02C 2.32 ± 0.11D 12.25 ± 0.01B 19.37 ± 0.16A
1 Different uppercase letters in the same row mean significant differences between groups at p-value < 0.05. Data are means ± S.D.; n = 3.
Table 2. Plant growth, photosynthetic pigments, and leaf compatible solutes of A. indiana under different soil salinity levels.
Table 2. Plant growth, photosynthetic pigments, and leaf compatible solutes of A. indiana under different soil salinity levels.
Plant traits KK1 KK2 HK1 HK2
Plant growth
Plant biomass (%) 27.90 ± 2.43B1 26.83 ± 0.43B 34.11 ± 1.50A 30.18 ± 7.10B
Stem height (cm) 17.50 ± 2.52A 16.37 ± 2.90A 20.10 ± 1.87A 19.23 ± 0.95A
Leaf area (cm-2) 8.67 ± 1.53B 11.67 ± 1.15A 8.67 ± 2.08B 7.33 ± 1.53B
Photosynthetic pigments (µg g-1)
Chlorophyll a 173.83 ± 8.48C 171.53 ± 3.31C 189.09 ± 1.76B 332.96 ± 5.01A
Chlorophyll b 120.94 ± 5.50B 129.37 ± 6.43B 94.49 ± 0.99C 187.42 ± 1.38A
Total chlorophyll 294.77 ± 13.94B 300.90 ± 9.73B 283.57 ± 2.73B 520.38 ± 6.23A
β-carotene 177.49 ± 8.87A 133.05 ± 0.96B 103.62 ± 0.73C 186.60 ± 2.23A
Leaf compatible solutes (µg g-1)
Anthocyanins 250.48 ± 6.68A 60.68 ± 11.12C 63.46 ± 4.42C 166.99 ± 14.56B
Proline 147.25 ± 4.20A 112.22 ± 18.30B 107.77 ± 4.42B 91.64 ± 15.50C
Total sugar 28.28 ± 0.02A 11.16 ± 0.01C 15.32 ± 0.05B 16.50 ± 0.01B
1 Different uppercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences between groups at a p-value < 0.05. Data are presented as means ± S.D.; n = 3.
Table 3. Chemical compositions of A. indiana leaf volatiles from two saline habitats analyzed by Headspace SPME GC-MS.
Table 3. Chemical compositions of A. indiana leaf volatiles from two saline habitats analyzed by Headspace SPME GC-MS.
No. Chemical class & Compounds KK1 KK2 HK1 HK2
RT (min) Area sum (%) RT (min) Area sum (%) RT (min) Area sum (%) RT (min) Area sum (%)
Monoterpenes
1 α-pinene 7.263 2.65 7.163 0.71 7.262 0.95 7.163 0.47
2 sabinene 8.780 0.09 8.676 0.03 8.777 0.04 8.674 0.03
3 β-pinene 9.479 0.21 9.377 0.07 9.479 0.05 9.380 0.05
4 (+)-4-carene 9.757 0.08 9.651 0.03 9.754 0.03 9.650 0.02
5 3-carene 10.130 0.31 10.023 0.12 10.131 0.11 10.023 0.08
6 2-carene 10.409 0.17 10.307 0.05 10.412 0.04 10.309 0.03
7 m-cymene 10.742 0.21 10.648 0.11 10.741 0.12 10.647 0.10
8 D-limonene 10.951 21.44 10.849 9.11 10.934 8.45 10.846 7.27
9 β-ocimene 11.850 0.66 11.744 0.18 11.851 0.11 11.746 0.11
10 γ-terpinene 12.211 0.06 12.104 0.02 12.209 0.02 12.104 0.01
11 terpinolene 13.483 3.33 ND ND 13.484 0.97 ND ND
12 verbenone 18.759 0.21 18.735 0.21 18.756 0.23 18.740 0.09
13 carvone 20.371 0.09 20.297 0.12 20.360 0.17 20.304 0.14
14 zingiberene 27.445 0.14 27.360 0.22 27.457 0.19 27.360 0.23
Monoterpenoids
1 cis-β-terpineol 12.555 0.05 12.511 0.03 12.553 0.04 12.522 0.02
2 cis-linalool oxide 12.815 0.03 12.757 0.02 12.811 0.01 12.760 0.01
3 fenchone 13.381 2.54 13.323 4.28 13.404 6.53 13.348 6.63
4 β-linalool 14.104 0.27 14.054 0.21 14.102 0.19 14.054 0.16
5 fenchol 14.550 0.07 14.506 0.11 14.550 0.26 14.509 0.20
6 trans-p-mentha-2,8-dienol 14.901 0.06 14.856 0.05 14.894 0.14 14.858 0.09
7 α-campholenal 15.112 0.02 ND ND 15.109 0.04 ND ND
8 cis-p-mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol 15.524 0.08 ND ND 15.541 0.10 ND ND
9 endo-borneol 16.854 0.07 16.823 0.06 16.855 0.06 16.826 0.05
10 citral 17.405 0.73 17.360 0.47 17.411 1.10 17.368 0.75
11 p-cymen-8-ol 17.830 1.14 17.832 1.19 17.847 1.78 17.845 1.45
12 α-terpineol 18.038 0.21 18.013 0.20 18.043 0.20 18.021 0.13
Sesquiterpenes
1 β-elemene 26.796 1.27 26.744 1.66 26.819 0.99 26.743 0.81
2 β-caryophyllene 27.814 1.85 27.743 2.11 27.823 1.01 27.734 1.07
3 α-caryophyllene 29.208 6.17 29.168 7.45 29.219 4.32 29.164 5.94
4 cis-β-farnesene 29.580 0.13 29.483 0.25 29.580 0.22 29.483 0.28
5 β-selinene 30.505 0.41 30.426 0.68 30.513 0.38 30.434 0.34
6 α-selinene 30.879 0.32 30.798 0.51 30.885 0.26 30.797 0.24
7 β-bisabolene 31.616 12.85 31.629 21.08 31.677 19.67 31.657 24.50
8 β-sesquiphellandrene 32.141 0.64 32.078 1.08 32.153 0.87 32.085 1.11
9 humulene-1,2-epoxide 35.217 0.53 35.178 1.11 35.223 0.90 35.190 1.69
Sesquiterpenoids
1 chrysanthenone 24.542 1.34 24.535 1.44 24.553 1.84 24.534 1.43
2 cinerolone 27.090 0.40 27.050 0.66 27.103 0.43 27.053 0.56
3 caryophyllene oxide 34.219 0.18 34.173 0.30 34.222 0.25 34.172 0.32
Ketones
1 p-mentha-1,8-dien-3-one, (+)- 21.574 0.08 21.532 0.12 21.576 0.13 21.534 0.11
2 3-cyclopenten-1-one, 2-hydroxy-3-(3-methyl-2-butenyl)- 25.842 34.98 25.969 40.63 25.966 44.04 25.991 40.66
Miscellaneous and Diverse Compounds
1 1-octen-3-ol Alcohols 9.061 1.00 9.014 0.34 9.063 0.40 9.017 0.39
2 dodecane Alkane 18.623 0.23 ND ND 18.623 0.15 ND ND
3 benzofuran, 4,7-dimethyl- Ether 18.975 0.07 18.886 0.08 18.972 0.10 18.882 0.10
4 2-allyl-4-methylphenol Phenols 19.236 0.13 19.201 0.32 19.239 0.19 19.208 0.30
5 1,4-benzenediol, 2,5-dimethyl- Phenols 22.298 0.53 22.244 0.45 22.308 0.58 22.247 0.50
6 2-cyclohexen-1-one, 3,6-dimethyl-6-(1-methylethyl)- Cycloalkanes 22.721 0.50 22.692 0.40 22.729 0.45 22.693 0.45
7 benzene, 2-chloro-1-ethyl-5-methoxy-3-methyl- Aromatic 33.879 1.47 33.881 1.73 33.887 0.89 33.864 1.08
Total identified classes
Monoterpenes 29.65 10.98 11.48 8.63
Monoterpenoids 5.27 6.62 10.45 9.49
Sesquiterpenes 23.64 34.82 27.72 34.29
Sesquiterpenoids 2.27 3.21 3.17 3.68
Ketones 35.24 41.05 44.42 41.09
Miscellaneous 3.93 3.32 2.76 2.82
Total 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
* ND indicates “Not detected”.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated