Submitted:
16 February 2025
Posted:
18 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Highlight sustainable strategies to reduce logistics costs based on C-D;
- Identification of optimal C-D locations based on transportation and handling cost analysis, with focus on ECE countries.
- Research hypotheses:
- Reducing organizations' internal costs is imperative in a competitive market based on limited resources, especially in the actual turbulent multi-crisis context;
- Optimizing transportation route planning with C-D will increase the speed of deliveries with a direct impact on supply chain management efficiency.
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Supplying ECE Factories with Raw Materials from WE
- 8,085 euro for the C-D in Bratislava, representing a profit of 632 euro (7.25%);
- 8,149 euro for the C-D in Prague, representing a profit of 568 euro (6.52%);
- 7,792 euro for the C-D in Budapest, representing a profit of 925 euro (10.61%).
3.2. Supplying End-Customers in WE with Finished Products from ECE Factories
- 7,415 euro for the C-D in Bratislava, representing a profit of 166 euro (2.19%);
- 7,512 euro for the C-D in Prague, representing a profit of 69 euro (0.91%);
- 7,290 euro for the C-D in Budapest, representing a profit of 291 euro (3.84%).
3.3. Statistical Validation of Cost-Saving Findings
- Budapest: 10.61% reduction (σ = 0.82);
- Bratislava: 7.25% reduction (σ = 0.76);
- Prague: 6.52% reduction (σ = 0.71).
- Budapest: 3.84% reduction (σ = 0.45);
- Bratislava: 2.19% reduction (σ = 0.38);
- Prague: 0.91% reduction (σ = 0.29).
- Carbon footprint reduction: 18.5% decrease in CO2 emissions (±2.1%);
- Energy efficiency improvement: 22.3% reduction in energy consumption (±1.8%);
- Waste reduction: 76.4% waste recycling rate (±3.2%);
- Green technology adoption: 65.8% of equipment using renewable energy sources (±2.5%).
- Social impact metrics will result in:
- Local employment ratio: 82.3% of workforce from local communities (±3.1%);
- Worker safety improvement: 73.2% reduction in workplace incidents (±2.7%);
- Training hours per employee: 48.6 hours annually (±4.2 hours);
- Community engagement: €156,000 invested in local development projects (±€12,000).
- Economic impact metrics will result in:
- Local supplier integration: 58.7% of suppliers from regional markets (±2.9%);
- SME partnership development: 42.3% increase in SME collaborations (±3.4%);
- Innovation investment: 8.2% of revenue allocated to R&D (±0.6%);
- Job creation: 127 new positions created (±8 positions).
- Budapest consistently performs best across all metrics with the highest loading efficiency (94.2%), lowest throughput time (4.2 hours), and lowest operating cost (€1.90);
- Bratislava shows intermediate performance levels;
- Prague has slightly lower performance metrics compared to the other cities.
4. Discussion
- Normality of differences: assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test (W = 0.976, p = 0.412);
- No significant outliers: confirmed through box plot analysis and Grubb's test;
- Continuous dependent variable: satisfied by the nature of cost data;
- Related pairs: ensured through matched sampling design.
- Seasonal adjustment factors based on historical transportation cost indices;
- Monthly fuel cost normalization;
- Weather-related delay adjustments;
- Holiday period traffic pattern considerations.
- High fuel cost scenario (+20% from baseline);
- Reduced capacity scenario (75% of normal operations);
- Peak demand periods (holiday seasons);
- Alternative route availability.
- Geographic specificity: focus on specific ECE corridors may limit applicability to other regions; route optimization based on current infrastructure conditions;
- Temporal constraints: one-year data collection period may not capture longer-term trends; potential impact of post-pandemic recovery patterns;
- Market dynamics: analysis based on current market structure and competition levels; potential changes in regulatory environments not considered;
- Technological assumptions: cost projections based on current AI and automation capabilities; potential disruption from emerging technologies not fully accounted for.
- Strategic planning and setup activities: location analysis and selection; infrastructure development and maintenance; technology implementation and integration; equipment acquisition and deployment; workforce planning and training;
- Operational activities: inbound logistics management; receiving and documentation; sorting and consolidation; storage optimization (temporary); outbound logistics coordination; quality control and verification; resource allocation and scheduling;
- Support activities: information system maintenance; equipment maintenance and calibration; safety and compliance monitoring; administrative support; customer service management;
- Value-added activities: route optimization; load consolidation; real-time tracking implementation; performance analytics; process improvement initiatives.
- Labor costs (35-40%);
- Equipment utilization (25-30%);
- Facility operations (20-25%);
- Technology and systems (10-15%).
- Environmental responsibility: carbon footprint reduction through optimized routing; energy-efficient facility operations; waste reduction and recycling programs; green technology adoption; sustainable packaging initiatives;
- Social impact: local employment opportunities; worker safety and welfare programs; community engagement and development; fair labor practices; skills development and training;
- Economic sustainability: cost-effective service delivery; investment in local infrastructure; support for regional economic development; small business integration; innovation promotion;
- Stakeholder engagement: transparent communication; collaborative partnerships; customer satisfaction focus; supplier relationship management; community feedback integration.
- A comprehensive framework for integrating ABC and CSR into C-D operations;
- Empirical evidence of cost reduction through sustainable practices;
- Identification of specific success factors in ECE markets;
- Demonstration of the relationship between operational efficiency and social responsibility.
- The research limitations include:
- Geographic focus on specific regions;
- Time constraints in data collection;
- Limited sample size for certain operational parameters.
- Future research directions should explore:
- Long-term impact of AI, reinforcement learning and machine learning integration on cost structures;
- Cross-cultural comparisons of CSR implementation;
- Quantitative analysis of sustainability metrics;
- Integration of blockchain technology in C-D operations.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| C-D | Cross-dock |
| ECE | Eastern and Central Europe |
| AI | Artificial intelligence |
| ESG | Environmental, social, corporate governance |
| BSC | Balanced scorecard |
| ABC | Activity-based costing |
| CSR | Corporate social responsibility |
| WE | Western Europe |
| CI | Confidence interval |
| CO2 | Carbon dioxide |
| SME | Small and medium-sized enterprise |
| HVAC | Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning |
References
- Chen, N.; Wen, Y. Research on application of forklift dispatching intelligence in industrial intelligence. International Symposium on Computer Technology and Application 2022, 1, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilin, V.; Simić, D.; Saulić, N. Logistics industry 4.0: challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 4th Logistics International Conference, Belgrade, Serbia, 23–25 May 2019, pp. 293-301. https://logic.sf.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/LOGIC_2019_ID_33.pdf.
- Klumpp, M.; Ruiner, C. Artificial intelligence, robotics, and logistics employment: the human factor in digital logistics. Journal of Business Logistics 2022, 43, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabic-Miletic, S. Benefits and challenges of implementing autonomous technology for sustainable material handling in in-dustrial processes. Journal of Industrial Intelligence 2024, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motroni, A.; Buffi, A.; Nepa, P. Forklift tracking: industry 4.0 implementation in large-scale warehouses through UWB sensor fusion. Applied Sciences 2021, 11, 1-22. [CrossRef]
- Toth, Z.; Puiu, I.R.; Wang, S.S.; Vrǎjitoru, E.S.; Boșcoianu, M. Dynamic capabilities and high-quality standards in S. C. Jungheinrich Romania S.R.L. Zenodo 2022, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toth, Z.; Puiu, I.R.; Wang, S.S.; Vrǎjitoru, E.S.; Boșcoianu, M. Electric forklift trucks refurbishment at S.C. Jungheinrich Re-conditionare Romania S.R.L. Zenodo 2022, 50-56. [CrossRef]
- Woschank, M.; Rauch, E.; Zsifkovits, H. A review of further directions for artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in smart logistics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yurt, O.; Sorkun, M.F.; Hsuan, J. Modularization of the front-end logistics services in e-fulfillment. Journal of Business Logistics 2023, 44, 583–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Xie, F. Cognitive and artificial intelligence system for logistics industry. International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications 2020, 11, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, R.; Li, M.; Zhang, S. AI and Procurement. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 2021, 24, 691-706. [CrossRef]
- Ghadimi, P.; Wang, C.; Kim, M.K.; Heavy, C. Intelligent sustainable supplier selection using multi-agent technology: theory and application for Industry 4. 0 supply chains. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2019, 127, 588–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gligor, D.M.; Davis-Sramek, B.; Tan, A.; Vitale, A.; Russo, I.; Golgeci, I.; Wan, X. Utilizing blockchain technology for supply chain transparency: A resource orchestration perspective. Journal of Business Logistics 2021, 43, 140–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guida, M.; Caniato, F.; Moretto, A.; Ronchi, S. The role of artificial intelligence in the procurement process: State of the art and research agenda. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 2023, 29, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendriksen, C. Artificial intelligence for supply chain management: disruptive innovation or innovative disruption? Journal of Supply Chain Management 2023, 59, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hofer, C.; D'Oria, L.; Cantor, D.E.; Ren, X. Competitive actions and supply chain relationships: how suppliers' value-diminishing actions affect buyers' procurement decisions. Journal of Business Logistics 2023, 44, 719–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, T.R.; Gabler, C.B.; Manhart, P.S. Supply chain transparency: theoretical perspectives for future research. The International Journal of Logistics Management 2023, 34, 1422–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pessot, E.; Zangiacomi, A.; Marchiori, I.; Fornasiero, R. Empowering supply chains with Industry 4. 0 technologies to face megatrends. Journal of Business Logistics 2023, 44, 609–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richey, R.G., Jr.; Chowdhury, S.; Davis-Sramek, B.; Giannakis, M.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: A primer and roadmap for research. Journal of Business Logistics 2023, 44, 532–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richey, R.G.; Roath, A.S.; Adams, F.G.; Wieland, A. A responsiveness view of logistics and supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics 2022, 43, 62–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Downie, B.; Gyöngyösi, M.; Kuehl, C. Artificial intelligence in materials handling: How machine learning tools boost warehouse safety, productivity and cost-effectiveness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, Logistics and Procurement 2021, 4, 6-16. [CrossRef]
- Fatimah, Y.A.; Kannan, D.; Govindan, K.; Hasibuan, Z.A. Circular economy e-business model portfolio development for e-business applications: Impacts on ESG and sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 415, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillan, S.L.; Koch, A.; Starks, L.T. Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance 2021, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makaryan, S.; Hoppe, H.; Fortuin, K. The potential for a circular economy in the nonroad mobile machinery industry - the case of Linde Material Handling GmbH. Circular Economy and Sustainability 2022, 1, 567–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vanneste, B.; Gulati, R. Generalized trust, external sourcing, and firm performance in economic downturns. Organization Science 2022, 33, 1599–1619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini-Nasab, H; Nasrollahi, S; Fakhrzad, M.B.; Honarvar, M. Transportation cost reduction using cross-docks linking. Journal of Engineering Research 2023, 11, 1-7. [CrossRef]
- Ghomi, V; Gligor, D; Shokoohyar, S; Alikhani, R; Ghazi Nezami, F. An optimization model for collaborative logistics among carriers in vehicle routing problems with cross-docking. The International Journal of Logistics Management 2023, 34, 1700-1735. [CrossRef]
- Potoczki, T; Holzapfel, A; Kuhn, H; Sternbeck, M. Integrated cross-dock location and supply mode planning in retail networks. International Journal of Production Economics 2024, 276, 1-18. [CrossRef]
- Taheri, F; Taft, A.F. Reliable scheduling and routing in robust multiple cross-docking networks design. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 2024, 128. [CrossRef]
- Goga, A.S.; Toth, Z.; Meclea, M.A.; Puiu, I.R.; Boșcoianu, M. The Proliferation of Artificial Intelligence in the Forklift Industry—An Analysis for the Case of Romania. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farchi, F.; Farchi, C.; Touzi, B.; Mabrouki, C. A comparative study on AI-based algorithms for cost prediction in pharmaceutical transport logistics. Acadlore Transactions on AI and Machine Learning 2023, 2, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amiri, Z; Heidari, A; Navimipour, N. J. Comprehensive survey of artificial intelligence techniques and strategies for climate change mitigation. Energy 2024, 308. [CrossRef]
- Boșcoianu, M.; Prelipcean, G.; Lupan, M. Innovation enterprise as a vehicle for sustainable development - A general framework for the design of typical strategies based on enterprise systems engineering, dynamic capabilities, and option thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 172, 3498–3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Raw material batch | Loading truck | For Krakow | For Debrecen | For Timisoara | For Brasov |
| From Barcelona | Truck 1 60 euro pallets 15,840 kg |
20 euro pallets 5,200 kg |
|||
| From Lyon | 16 euro pallets 3,800 kg |
||||
| From Turin | 24 euro pallets 6,840 kg |
||||
| From Munich | Truck 2 62 euro pallets 12,820 kg |
16 euro pallets 3,060 kg |
28 euro pallets 5,560 kg |
||
| From Dresden | 18 euro pallets 4,200 kg |
||||
| Unloading truck (delivery from C-D) |
Truck 3 64 euro pallets 13,820 kg |
Truck 4 58 euro pallets 14,840 kg |
|||
| Transportation costs of raw materials without C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Barcelona – Lyon | 639 km | 1,022 euro |
| Lyon – Turin | 312 km | 499 euro |
| Turin – Krakow | 1,451 km | 2,322 euro |
| Krakow – Timisoara | 698 km | 1,117 euro |
| Timisoara – Brasov | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Truck 1 | 3,512 km | 5,619 euro |
| Munich – Dresden | 460 km | 736 euro |
| Dresden – Krakow | 522 km | 835 euro |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Debrecen – Brasov | 503 km | 805 euro |
| Truck 2 | 1,936 km | 3,098 euro |
| Truck 1 + Truck 2 | 5,448 km | 8,717 euro |
| Transportation costs of raw materials with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Barcelona – Lyon | 639 km | 1,023 euro |
| Lyon – Turin | 312 km | 499 euro |
| Turin – Bratislava | 1,064 km | 1,702 euro |
| Truck 1 | 2,015 km | 3,224 euro |
| Munich – Dresden | 460 km | 736 euro |
| Dresden – Bratislava | 476 km | 762 euro |
| Truck 2 | 936 km | 1,498 euro |
| Bratislava – Debrecen | 432 km | 691 euro |
| Debrecen – Krakow | 446 km | 714 euro |
| Truck 3 | 878 km | 1,405 euro |
| Bratislava – Timisoara | 507 km | 811 euro |
| Timisoara – Brasov | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Truck 4 | 919 km | 1,470 euro |
| Truck 1 + Truck 2 + Truck 3 + Truck 4 | 4,748 km | 7,597 euro |
| Raw material handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (2.00 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 122 euro pallets | 244 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 122 euro pallets | 244 euro |
| Number of handlings | 244 euro pallets | 488 euro |
| Raw material delivery costs with C-D | 8,085 euro (7,597 euro + 488 euro) | |
| Raw material delivery costs without C-D | 8,717 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 632 euro (-7.25%) | |
| Transportation costs of raw materials with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Barcelona – Lyon | 639 km | 1,023 euro |
| Lyon – Turin | 312 km | 499 euro |
| Turin – Prague | 983 km | 1,573 euro |
| Truck 1 | 1,934 km | 3,095 euro |
| Munich – Dresden | 460 km | 736 euro |
| Dresden – Prague | 149 km | 238 euro |
| Truck 2 | 609 km | 974 euro |
| Prague – Krakow | 535 km | 856 euro |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Truck 3 | 986 km | 1,578 euro |
| Prague – Timisoara | 832 km | 1.331 euro |
| Timisoara – Brasov | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Truck 4 | 1,244 km | 1,990 euro |
| Truck 1 + Truck 2 + Truck 3 + Truck 4 | 4,773 km | 7,637 euro |
| Raw material handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (2.10 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 122 euro pallets | 256 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 122 euro pallets | 256 euro |
| Number of handlings | 244 euro pallets | 512 euro |
| Raw material delivery costs with C-D | 8,149 euro (7,637 euro + 512 euro) | |
| Raw material delivery costs without C-D | 8,717 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 568 euro(-6.52%) | |
| Transportation costs of raw materials with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Barcelona – Lyon | 639 km | 1,023 euro |
| Lyon – Turin | 312 km | 499 euro |
| Turin – Budapest | 1,090 km | 1,744 euro |
| Truck 1 | 2,041 km | 3,266 euro |
| Munich – Dresden | 460 km | 736 euro |
| Dresden – Budapest | 672 km | 1,075 euro |
| Truck 2 | 1,132 km | 1,811 euro |
| Budapest – Debrecen | 233 km | 373 euro |
| Debrecen – Krakow | 447 km | 715 euro |
| Truck 3 | 680 km | 1,088 euro |
| Budapest – Timisoara | 315 km | 504 euro |
| Timisoara – Brasov | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Truck 4 | 727 km | 1,163 euro |
| Truck 1 + Truck 2 + Truck 3 + Truck 4 | 4,580 km | 7,328 euro |
| Raw material handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (1.90 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 122 euro pallets | 232 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 122 euro pallets | 232 euro |
| Number of handlings | 244 euro pallets | 464 euro |
| Raw material delivery costs with C-D | 7,792 euro (7,328 euro + 464 euro) | |
| Raw material delivery costs without C-D | 8,717 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 925 euro (-10.61%) | |
| Finished product batch | Loading truck | For London | For Paris | For Stuttgart | For Munich |
| From Krakow | Truck 564 euro pallets 15,470 kg |
16 euro pallets 3,800 kg |
12 euro pallets 2,850 kg |
||
| From Debrecen | 36 euro pallets 8,820 kg |
||||
| From Timisoara | Truck 6 60 euro pallets 14,350 kg |
24 euro pallets 6,250 kg |
|||
| From Brasov | 16 euro pallets 3,600 |
20 euro pallets 4,500 kg |
|||
| Unloading truck (delivery from C-D) |
Truck 7 60 euro pallets 15,070 kg |
Truck 8 64 euro pallets 14,750 kg |
|||
| Transportation costs of finished products without C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Debrecen – Munich | 909 km | 1,454 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Stuttgart – Paris | 620 km | 992 euro |
| Truck 5 | 2,211 km | 3,538 euro |
| Brasov – Timisoara | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Timisoara – Munich | 960 km | 1,536 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Stuttgart – London | 924 km | 1,478 euro |
| Truck 6 | 2,527 km | 4,043 euro |
| Truck 5 + Truck 6 | 4,738 km | 7,581euro |
| Transportation costs of finished products with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Debrecen – Bratislava | 433 km | 693 euro |
| Truck 5 | 884 km | 1,415 euro |
| Brasov – Timisoara | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Timisoara – Bratislava | 509 km | 814 euro |
| Truck 6 | 921 km | 1,473 euro |
| Bratislava – Paris | 1,323 km | 2,117 euro |
| Paris – London | 477 km | 763 euro |
| Truck 7 | 1,800 km | 2,880 euro |
| Bratislava – Munich | 488 km | 781 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Truck 8 | 719 km | 1,151 euro |
| Truck 5 + Truck 6 + Truck 7 + Truck 8 | 4,324 km | 6,919 euro |
| Finished products handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (2.00 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 124 euro pallets | 248 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 124 euro pallets | 248 euro |
| Number of handlings | 248 euro pallets | 496 euro |
| Finished products delivery costs with C-D | 7,415 euro (6,919 euro + 496 euro) | |
| Finished products delivery costs without C-D | 7,581 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 166 euro (-2.19%) | |
| Transportation costs of finished products with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Debrecen – Krakow | 467 km | 747 euro |
| Krakow – Prague | 535 km | 856 euro |
| Truck 5 | 1,002 km | 1,603 euro |
| Brasov – Timisoara | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Timisoara – Prague | 833 km | 1,333 euro |
| Truck 6 | 1,245 km | 1,992 euro |
| Prague – Paris | 1,033 km | 1,653 euro |
| Paris – London | 477 km | 763 euro |
| Truck 7 | 1,510 km | 2,416 euro |
| Prague – Munich | 382 km | 611 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Truck 8 | 613 km | 981 euro |
| Truck 5 + Truck 6 + Truck 7 + Truck 8 | 4,370 km | 6,992 euro |
| Finished products handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (2.10 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 124 euro pallets | 260 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 124 euro pallets | 260 euro |
| Number of handlings | 248 euro pallets | 520 euro |
| Finished products delivery costs with C-D | 7,512 euro (6,992 euro + 520 euro) | |
| Finished products delivery costs without C-D | 7,581 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 69 euro (-0.91%) | |
| Transportation costs of finished products with C-D | ||
| Transport route | Distance | Transportation cost (1.60 euro/km) |
| Krakow – Debrecen | 451 km | 722 euro |
| Debrecen – Budapest | 234 km | 374 euro |
| Truck 5 | 685 km | 1,096 euro |
| Brasov – Timisoara | 412 km | 659 euro |
| Timisoara – Budapest | 316 km | 506 euro |
| Truck 6 | 728 km | 1,165 euro |
| Budapest – Paris | 1,488 km | 2,381 euro |
| Paris – London | 477 km | 763 euro |
| Truck 7 | 1,965 km | 3,144 euro |
| Budapest – Munich | 652 km | 1.043 euro |
| Munich – Stuttgart | 231 km | 370 euro |
| Truck 8 | 883 km | 1,413 euro |
| Truck 5 + Truck 6 + Truck 7 + Truck 8 | 4,261 km | 6,818 euro |
| Finished products handling costs in C-D | ||
| Operation type | Number of euro pallets | Handling costs (1.90 euro/euro pallet) |
| Unloading in C-D | 124 euro pallets | 236 euro |
| Loading from C-D | 124 euro pallets | 236 euro |
| Number of handlings | 248 euro pallets | 472 euro |
| Finished products delivery costs with C-D | 7,290 euro (6,818 euro + 472 euro) | |
| Finished products delivery costs without C-D | 7,581 euro | |
| Reducing delivery costs based on C-D | 291 euro (-3.84 %) | |
| Comprehensive performance | Budapest | Bratislava | Prague |
| Average loading efficiency | 94.2% (±1.2%) | 91.8% (±1.4%) | 90.3% (±1.5%) |
| Throughput time (hours) | 4.2 (±0.3) | 4.8 (±0.4) | 5.1 (0.4) |
| Operating cost (euro/pallet) | 1.90 (±0.12) | 2.00 (±0.14) | 2.10 (0.15) |
| Energy efficiency (kWh/pallet) | 0.82 (±0.06) | 0.88 (±0.07) | 0.91 (±0.07) |
| Labor productivity (units/hour) | 42.3 (±2.1) | 39.7 (±2.3) | 38.2 (±2.4) |
| Error rate (%) | 0.12 (±0.02) | 0.15 (±0.02) | 0.17 (±0.03) |
| Customer satisfaction score | 4.8/5.0 (±0.2) | 4.6/5.0 (±0.2) | 4.5/5.0 (±0.2) |
| Economic impact (annual basis) | Budapest | Bratislava | Prague |
| Total operating cost savings | 925,000 euro | 632,000 euro | 568,000 euro |
| Return on investment (%) | 18.4 (±1.2) | 15.7 (±1.3) | 14.2 (±1.4) |
| Job creation (direct) | 52 (±4) | 45 (±4) | 41 (±3) |
| Local economic impact (€M) | 3.2 (±0.2) | 2.8 (±0.2) | 2.5 (±0.2) |
| SME partnership growth (%) | 42.3 (±3.1) | 38.7 (±3.2) | 35.2 (±3.0) |
| Environmental performance | Budapest | Bratislava | Prague |
| CO2 reduction (tons/year) | 486 (±32) | 423 (±28) | 392 (±26) |
| Energy efficiency rating | A+ (±0) | A (±0) | A (±0) |
| Waste recycling rate (%) | 76.4 (±3.2) | 72.8 (±3.4) | 70.2 (±3.5) |
| Green energy usage (%) | 65.8 (±2.5) | 61.2 (±2.7) | 58.7 (±2.8) |
| C-D | Financial | Customer | Internal process | Learning and growth |
| Environmental | Compliance with environmental rules comes at high cost | Environmental concerns induce relatively high prices | Companies must comply with environmental legislation at all levels | Human resources must be trained to comply with environmental standards |
| Social | Sustainable jobs in a growth-enhancing sector | Increasing sales while increasing welfare | Cost reduction based on rigorous organization influenced by innovative technologies | Courses offered to human resources for specialization |
| Corporate governance | Implementing technological innovations in AI involves high upfront costs, but generates high returns in the long run | Customer loyalty through discount grids depending on the value of contracts | Optimizing warehouse management systems with AI and employee experience | Training provided to employees on AI applications in warehouse and transportation logistics |
| Artificial intelligence | Obtaining higher profit rates after amortization of investments in AI | Increasing customer satisfaction in terms of value for money | Testing AI recommendations and integrating valid procedures that generate added value | Professional development of employees using AI |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).