Introduction
Software supply chain vulnerabilities are a ticking time bomb, and each explosion creates widespread disruption and data breaches. Recent examples with a victim base in the range of millions and an impact in terms of dollars in the range of billions paint a picture of the severity of such an attack.
Existing methodologies have a tendency to follow discrete workflows for code sign and Docker image sign and, in the process, introduce vulnerabilities at each stage in between. Common vulnerabilities like privilege escalation vulnerabilities in container images and insecure cryptographic algorithms for codesigning certificates add justification for security at all development stages.
The Hybrid Chain of Trust (HCoT) algorithm overcomes such obstacles with a single converged approach leveraging improvements in AI and blockchain technology. Smart analysis through AI-powered analysis, tamper-evidence through tamper-evident code bundle, and secure key management through decentralized key management work together to streamline workflows, enhance security, and enable transparency in the software delivery pipeline.
One-Sentence Summary: Hybrid Chain of Trust (HCoT) algorithm proposes a unified, AI and blockchain-based method for securing a software supply chain with efficient workflows, security, and transparency enhancement.
Existing Challenges: Securing a software supply chain is a complex problem with many obstacles. Traditional methods have two workflows for signing codes and Docker images, generating additional complexity and opportunity for human vulnerability [
1]. Traditional methods also use a centralised Certificate Authority (CA) for issuing sign certificates, offering one single point of failure such as in NotPetya [
2].
Other than these signing factors, several other factors contribute towards overall software supply chain risk:
1. Lack of Visibility:
Following software parts and dependencies through a supply chain is challenging. Transparency in lack of origin and dependencies in software parts is not an easy one, and hence vulnerability detection and mitigation in third-party libraries or dependencies is a challenge [
3].
1. Open-Source Vulnerabilities:
Open-source parts, with a function and efficiency, can introduce security vulnerabilities in case vulnerabilities in them go undetected and go unpatched in a timely manner. Maintaining an updated record of vulnerabilities and deploying timely patches is a must [
4].
1. Limited Automation:
Security audits and updates in a manual manner can take a long and error-prone path. Security checking in the development life cycle through automation detects and corrects vulnerabilities early in life [
5].
The drawback with these is that they require new and innovative approaches that make workflows easier, improve security, and improve transparency in the software delivery pipeline. An admission must, however, be made that HCoT can introduce its own constraint, such as increased computational cost in AI-powered analysis and the potential for added complexity in working with decentralized keys.
AI-powered analysis of code for vulnerability detection in the codebase.
Decentralized key management for elimination of single point of failure with CAs.
Tamper-evident bundles of code for integrity safeguarding of code and accompanying analysis reports.
By overcoming these challenges, HCoT presents a secure and efficient software supply chain security solution.
Proposed Solution: HCoT Algorithm
The HCoT Algorithm introduces a new model for securing the software supply chain. It builds a secure and verifiable trust chain for both Docker images and code, fixing key development issues for today's environment. HCoT Algorithm does this through a range of key capabilities, including AI analysis for code, secure bundle creation, and key management through a decentralized model. All these capabilities can be seen in the below diagram, a visualization of the HCoT workflow.
HCoT Workflow
A software developer creating a new software application. The developer codes and then pushes onto a versioning system. HCoT then takes over and performs the following:
HCoT retrieves the latest code from the version control system.
-
2.
AI Analysis:
The code is subjected to comprehensive AI analysis to identify vulnerabilities and security weaknesses.
-
3.
Bundle Creation:
Upon successful analysis, a secure bundle is created using containerization technologies, encapsulating the verified codebase.
-
4.
Decentralized Key Management:
Cryptographic keys are generated and securely distributed across a decentralized network for bundle encryption.
-
5.
Secure Distribution:
The signed and encrypted code bundle is made available for deployment in various environments.
Benefits of HCoT
The HCoT Algorithm brings many key advantages in securing software supply:
HCoT significantly strengthens the overall security posture through its core functionalities:
AI-Powered Code Analysis:
This can identify a broader range of vulnerabilities compared to traditional signature-based methods, potentially reducing the likelihood of undetected security flaws. Research suggests that AI-powered code analysis can achieve high accuracy in vulnerability detection [
6].
The HCoT Algorithm offers a multitude of benefits for developers. By leveraging AI-powered analysis, HCoT proactively identifies security risks early in the development process. This allows developers to address vulnerabilities before they become critical security breaches, saving time and resources. The AI analysis also improves code quality by detecting coding errors and inefficiencies, leading to more robust and secure software. This translates to a reduction in development time, as developers spend less time fixing vulnerabilities discovered later in the cycle. Overall, HCoT streamlines the development process by promoting secure coding practices and proactive risk mitigation.
HCoT can integrate with existing code scanning tools or leverage custom-built AI models trained on a vast dataset of vulnerabilities and secure coding practices.
Decentralized key management:
Eliminates the single point of failure for traditional Certificate Authorities (CAs). It is not possible for a compromised certificate of a CA to sign malicious software, but HCoT eliminates such an opportunity.
Decentralized key management forms a secure security mechanism for HCoT. By distributing its cryptographic keys in a peer-to-peer network, security overall drops to a significant level. With a system in distribution, it is incredibly challenging for hackers to penetrate and exploit, for hackers will have to penetrate several nodes at one go. HCoT is also more fault tolerant. In case one of a network's single node is compromised through an attack, supporting nodes can still maintain security for packages of codes. With such redundancy, security continues uninterrupted even in case a security attack occurs. Lastly, decentralized key management is highly scalable. As more and more users and codebases join in, the system can expand with ease to serve heightened demand, and HCoT becomes a future-proof device for an ever-changing software development environment.
The HCoT can use current decentralized key management tools such as Trezor or GPG to secure and manage its cryptographic keys to and from its peers.
Tamper-evident code bundles:
HCoT surpasses secure bundling by incorporating tamper-evident mechanisms to secure the code and the associated AI analysis report. This is very important because a compromised codebase or a manipulated report of the analysis will break the whole security framework. Here's how HCoT achieves a tamper-proof code bundle:
Examples include cryptographic hashing, such as SHA-256, which is used to ensure the integrity of the code and the AI analysis report. When either change, the signatures are invalidated, and tampering is easily detected.
HCoT employs a cryptographic hashing function, like SHA-256, on both the code and the AI analysis report to create a unique digital fingerprint. This fingerprint, also called a hash, is like a checksum in that it captures the exact content of the data.
The beauty in cryptographic hashes is that they are one-way. It's quite easy to generate a hash from any data, but highly computationally infeasible to recreate the original data from a given hash. Additionally, any small change in data will completely result in a different hash value.
The generated hashes of the code and the AI analysis report are securely stored within the code bundle itself. This way, they will travel with the code and the report and always be available for verification.
Here's how HCoT uses these tamper-evident mechanisms to ensure the integrity of the code bundle:
Upon receiving the code bundle, the recipient can recalculate the hash for the code and the analysis report using the same cryptographic hashing function (e.g., SHA-256).
The newly calculated hashes are then compared with the ones stored within the bundle.
If the calculated hashes match the stored ones, it confirms that the code and report haven't been tampered with during transit or storage. Any discrepancy between the values indicates a potential tampering attempt, alerting the recipient to a potential security breach.
HCoT's tamper-evident code bundles offer a trifecta of security benefits. Firstly, they foster trust by guaranteeing the authenticity of the code and the accompanying AI analysis report. Recipients can be confident that they haven't received tampered data, ensuring they're working with the genuine software and a reliable security assessment. Secondly, these bundles enable early breach detection. Any attempt to alter the code or report will be flagged, allowing for swift action to mitigate the potential security threat. Finally, tamper-evident bundles contribute to a more robust security posture throughout the software development lifecycle. By safeguarding the integrity of these critical elements, HCoT helps build a more secure foundation for software development.
HCoT's tamper-evident code bundles, powered by cryptographic hashing, play a vital role in safeguarding the integrity of the software supply chain. This ensures that developers and end-users can trust the code they deploy and rely on the validity of the AI analysis report for informed decision-making.
When a code bundle is delivered to the end user, the recipient can utilize the same cryptographic hashing function to re-compute the hashes for the code and the analysis report, for example, SHA-256.
The end user then proceeds to compare the newly computed hashes with the ones that are available within the bundle.
If the computed hash value is the same as the ones saved, then it means that the code and the report have not been modified after they were sent. Any differences in the values could indicate the received item was altered, which should set an alarm for a possible security breach.
Code bundles that are sensitive to tampering as produced by HCoT offer an opportunity for multiple security advantages. It fosters trust since it guarantees that the code and the AI analysis report were not altered. Recipients are certain that the data they have received is unmodified, which means that the software, and the security assessment have never been compromised. These bundles also allow for early breach detection. Any attempt to compromise the code or report will trigger an alert which can then decorrelate the security threat. Lastly, tamper-evident bundles allow me to have a stronger security stance during the entire software development process. By protecting these sensitive elements, HCoT fortifies the base of software development.