1. Introduction
The quest for ideal materials in bone regeneration and implantation has led to the widespread adoption of titanium and its alloys. Their biocompatibility, high strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and nonmagnetic properties make them excellent candidates for medical implants [
1,
2,
3]. The phenomenon of osseointegration, first described by Professor Brånemark, wherein a stable combination of titanium and bone tissue is achieved, has further cemented titanium's position in dentistry and orthopedics [
3,
4,
5]. However, while titanium offers remarkable advantages, its bio-inert nature necessitates surface modifications to enhance its interaction with biological tissues and to promote optimal bone regeneration [
3].
Titanium implants' success is tied to their surface characteristics, which influence cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [
6]. These surface properties are not just about topography, but also chemistry and wettability [
5]. In recent years, there has been an increasing focus on modifying the surface of titanium implants to enhance their biological properties and improve clinical outcomes [
3]. This has led to the development of a range of surface modification techniques aimed at enhancing osteointegration and promoting a healthier tissue environment [
5]. This review aims to provide a structured insight into the current state of titanium plate surface technology in osteogenesis, highlighting the advancements, identifying challenges, projecting future possibilities, and providing essential recommendations for research and clinical practice.
2. Search Methodology
A comprehensive and systematic literature search was conducted utilizing several electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, covering publications from 2010 to 2024. This search encompassed original research articles, review articles, and case studies pertinent to the clinical applications of titanium plate surfaces in osteogenesis. To further expand the search, Google Scholar was also queried to identify studies not indexed in the primary databases. A combination of keywords such as "titanium implants," "osteogenesis," "surface modification," "osseointegration," "antibacterial coatings," "bone regeneration," "3D-printed titanium," "laser treatment titanium," and "clinical applications" was employed to ensure comprehensive coverage of the topic. Only studies published in English were included in this review. The selection of articles was based on their relevance to the clinical applications of titanium plate surfaces, with a particular emphasis on scientific rigor and the practical implications for osteogenesis.
3. The Breakthroughs of Clinical Application of Titanium Plate Surface in Osteogenesis
Over the past decades, the clinical use of titanium in osteogenesis has seen significant breakthroughs driven by advancements in material science, surface engineering, and a deeper understanding of biological interactions.
3.1. Surface Modification and Enhanced Osteointegration
Surface modification of titanium implants is critical for improving osseointegration, directly influencing the success of orthopedic and dental implants [
2,
5]. Techniques such as sandblasting, acid etching (SLA), micro-arc oxidation (MAO), laser treatments, and nanotopography have been developed to enhance cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation on titanium surfaces [
3,
5,
7].
SLA, a widely used method, creates a micro-rough surface that increases surface area, promoting osteoblast adhesion and bone formation [
8]. MAO generates a porous oxide layer, which can be enriched with bioactive elements, fostering a favorable environment for bone healing [
3]. Laser treatments offer precise micro- and nanoscale surface modifications that improve cell alignment and osteogenic differentiation, without contaminating the surface [
7,
9].
Nanotopographical modifications, such as TiO2 nanotubes, enhance osseointegration by improving protein adsorption and facilitating osteoblast function [
10]. These nanoscale features also promote stem cell differentiation, making them a promising strategy for better implant integration [
2,
5].
Overall, advancements in surface modification techniques—SLA, MAO, laser treatments, and nanotopography—offer significant improvements in both initial biological response and long-term implant stability. Ongoing research is essential to refine these methods and evaluate their clinical implications across various applications.
3.2. Enhanced Biocompatibility Through Surface Chemistry
Surface chemistry is vital for improving the biocompatibility and osseointegration of titanium implants. Recent innovations focus on bioactive ions like calcium, phosphate, and magnesium, which enhance bone integration by promoting hydroxyapatite formation on the implant surface [
3,
5]. Calcium, in particular, stimulates bone attachment and growth, improving endosseous integration [
12].
In addition to chemical modifications, surface topography significantly impacts osseointegration. Laser treatments, such as erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) irradiation, influence osteoblast proliferation and cell attachment, highlighting the importance of surface protocols for clinical outcomes [
13]. Combining topographical and chemical modifications, such as chitosan/hydroxyapatite coatings, improves both osteoblast differentiation and implant stability [
14].
Dual-modified surfaces, integrating chemical and topographical features, promote cellular behavior, facilitating tissue regeneration [
15]. Additionally, factors like Semaphorin 3A (Sema3A) have been shown to enhance osteogenesis, particularly in osteoporosis models [
16,
17,
18].
In the realm of pharmacological interventions, Etoricoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, has been evaluated for its effects on osteoclastogenesis, periodontal bone loss, and root resorption during orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). Although it serves effectively as an analgesic, it does not influence tooth movement, indicating its limited role in orthodontic applications [
19]. On the other hand, sclerostin antibody (Scl-Ab) has demonstrated efficacy in enhancing implant fixation and bone formation in osteoporotic conditions [
20], while strontium (Sr) and silver (Ag)-loaded nanotubular structures improve both biological and mechanical properties by offering antibacterial properties and enhancing bone repair [
21].
Innovative approaches, including amorphous calcium phosphate functionalization and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), enhance osteogenic differentiation and bone formation on titanium surfaces [
22,
23]. Innovative approaches are also being explored to induce bone formation in challenging clinical settings. For example, mechanical stress applied to a tooth over a 2-week period has been shown to stimulate bone formation in the maxillary sinus, potentially offering a solution to the tedious process of tooth movement in this area [
24]. Furthermore, titanium implants with nano-pillared topographies and laser-sintered Ti-6Al-4V designs support enhanced tissue integration and bone growth [
25].
Besides, the immobilization of rhBMP2 on titanium implants via nano-anchored oligonucleotide strands has demonstrated potential for enhancing bone-implant contact. This method ensures that the rhBMP2 remains active in promoting osteogenesis while maintaining clinical relevance under standard sterilization conditions [
26].
The naturally occurring TiO2 oxide layer plays a critical role in osseointegration, facilitating bone attachment through its chemical stability and biocompatibility [
2]. Hydrophilic titanium surfaces also enhance osseointegration by promoting protein adsorption, which is crucial for osteoblast adhesion and proliferation [
5].
Furthermore, the application of biomimetic materials and fabrication techniques offers another promising avenue for enhancing bone tissue regeneration. These materials and approaches aim to replicate the natural bone microenvironment, thereby promoting more efficient and effective bone healing [
23]. By mimicking the structure and composition of native bone, biomimetic surfaces can foster a more favorable interaction with surrounding tissues, accelerating the regenerative process and improving overall implant integration [
27,
28,
29].
Therefore, optimizing titanium implants through surface chemistry and topographical modifications is crucial for enhancing osteointegration. Bioactive ions, multifunctional coatings, and innovative treatments like rhBMP-2 and Sema3A hold promise for improving clinical outcomes, expanding the applications of titanium implants in skeletal reconstruction and regenerative medicine.
3.3. Antibacterial Innovations
Implant-related infections remain a major challenge in orthopedic surgery, complicating the success of titanium implants and prolonging recovery. Recent advancements in antibacterial coatings aim to prevent bacterial adhesion, biofilm formation, and infections, thereby enhancing implant stability. One notable development is iodine-doped titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanotubes, which exhibit enhanced antimicrobial properties, particularly against
Staphylococcus aureus, while promoting biocompatibility and osseointegration [
30].
Silver nanoparticle coatings have also gained attention for their potent antibacterial effects, preventing biofilm formation. However, regulatory concerns regarding the use of fluorine-based polymers in these coatings require the development of safer alternatives [
1,
31].
These regulatory hurdles necessitate the development of safer, more biocompatible alternatives that maintain the antimicrobial efficacy of silver while addressing safety concerns. Innovative approaches, such as slippery liquid-infused porous surfaces (SLIPS), offer a novel strategy to repel bacteria, inspired by pitcher plants. However, their application is limited by the need to withstand autoclaving during sterilization [
1]. Additionally, silane coatings with antifungal properties are being explored to combat both bacterial and fungal infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients [
8].
Laser-modified surfaces are another promising approach, altering titanium topography at the micro- and nanoscale to disrupt bacterial adhesion and reduce biofilm formation, while simultaneously improving osseointegration [
7].
Significant progress has been made in the development of antibacterial coatings and surface modifications for titanium implants; however, further research is required to optimize their efficacy, biocompatibility, and regulatory compliance. These innovations hold great potential to reduce implant-related infections, improving patient outcomes and the long-term success of orthopedic procedures.
3.4. 3D Printing and Customized Implants
The advent of 3D printing has revolutionized titanium implant production, allowing for the creation of patient-specific implants with precise geometries tailored to individual anatomical needs. This innovation enhances implant fit, reduces failure rates, and addresses both functional and anatomical requirements [
2]. In oral and maxillofacial surgery, 3D-printed titanium alloy plates offer significant advantages for jawbone fracture repair and reconstructions. These custom implants improve anatomical fit, osteointegration, and reduce bacterial biofilm formation, while maintaining excellent biocompatibility [
2].
Beyond the jaw, 3D printing has improved outcomes in complex procedures, such as midface contouring, mandibular defect reconstruction, and acetabular fracture healing, by providing a more accurate implant fit and enhancing stability [
2]. Additionally, the integration of 3D printing with porous titanium scaffolds has advanced osseointegration, facilitating bone cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [
10]. These scaffolds, mimicking trabecular bone structure, promote efficient bone tissue penetration, making them ideal for critical-size defects [
10].
Therefore, 3D printing has transformed titanium implant design, enabling personalized, anatomically accurate implants that improve surgical outcomes and osteointegration. As this technology progresses, it is poised to play a pivotal role in enhancing osteogenesis and advancing orthopedic and reconstructive surgery.
3.5. Novel Plate Designs in Titanium Implants for Osteogenesis
Recent innovations in titanium plate designs have significantly improved surgical outcomes and mechanical stability across various orthopedic procedures. The three-holed titanium plate, used in open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, optimizes biomechanical properties to enhance structural stability and reduce complications associated with traditional fixation methods, leading to better patient outcomes in cervical spine surgeries [
32].
In pelvic surgery, contoured pelvic brim reconstruction plates are custom-designed to match the anatomical features of the pelvic region, improving fit, alignment, and long-term surgical success. These plates reduce surgical time and enhance postoperative recovery, becoming essential in managing complex pelvic fractures [
33].
Advanced computational techniques like finite element analysis (FEA) have further refined titanium plate design, allowing for precise simulations to optimize mechanical properties and load distribution. This ensures superior support, minimizing plate failure risks and improving fixation. FEA-driven anatomic plates are tailored to individual patient needs, considering bone density and fracture type [
34].
These novel plate designs mark significant progress in orthopedic surgery, offering personalized solutions that improve stability, reduce complications, and enhance patient outcomes. As technology advances, further innovations in titanium plates are expected to address surgical challenges and improve osteogenesis treatments.
3.6. The Versatility and Expanding Applications of Titanium Plates in Surgical Practices
Titanium plates, valued for their biocompatibility, strength, and corrosion resistance, are extensively used in various surgical fields. Beyond their established role in osteosynthesis, their versatility continues to grow in specialized procedures.
In sternal fixation after open-heart surgery, titanium plates have been shown to provide superior stability compared to traditional sternal wiring, particularly in patients with morbid obesity. Their rigidity enhances fixation, reducing complications like sternal dehiscence and promoting better healing, leading to improved long-term outcomes [
35].
In cervical spine surgeries, titanium plates are preferred for stabilizing and fixing vertebrae due to their mechanical strength and ability to maintain structural integrity under load. Their use has been linked to improved fusion and alignment, facilitating better surgical and postoperative outcomes [
36].
Titanium plates are also crucial in craniofacial surgeries, particularly in orthognathic procedures for repositioning the upper maxilla. Custom-designed plates ensure precise bone repositioning, minimizing complications such as malocclusion and incorrect alignment, offering both functional and aesthetic improvements [
37].
The development of titanium alloy implants for mandibular defect reconstruction is another area of rapid advancement. These implants, tailored to individual anatomy, provide enhanced mechanical support, improved osseointegration, and a reduced risk of failure, contributing to successful functional and aesthetic outcomes [
4].
Ultimately, titanium’s unique properties make it indispensable across a wide range of surgical applications, from cardiovascular and spinal surgeries to craniofacial and mandibular reconstructions. As material science and surgical techniques advance, titanium plates will continue to expand their role in addressing complex clinical challenges, improving patient outcomes, and enhancing the precision of personalized surgical approaches.
4. Challenges of Titanium Plate Surface Clinical Application in Osteogenesis
Despite the significant progress, several challenges remain in the clinical application of titanium plate surfaces for osteogenesis.
4.1. Long-Term Stability and Durability of Titanium Implants: Challenges and Considerations
Titanium is widely used in orthopedic and dental implants due to its excellent biocompatibility and mechanical properties. However, concerns regarding its long-term stability persist, especially in high-stress, load-bearing applications, where mechanical stresses, infection, and wear can lead to implant failure, loosening, or fracture over time [
3].
A primary issue is the mechanical mismatch between titanium and surrounding bone. Titanium's modulus of elasticity differs significantly from bone, leading to stress shielding, bone resorption, and eventual implant loosening [
10]. This highlights the need for biomimetic designs that better mimic bone properties to improve long-term outcomes.
Fatigue failure, particularly in high-stress areas like the spine and joints, is another concern. While titanium resists initial failure, prolonged cyclic loading can induce fatigue fractures, especially in patients involved in high-impact activities [
2]. Research into alternative alloys and surface modifications is needed to address this limitation.
Biofilm formation on titanium surfaces remains a significant challenge despite advances in antibacterial coatings. Bacterial colonization can lead to persistent infections, implant failure, and the need for revision surgeries [
1]. More effective, long-lasting antibacterial strategies are needed to prevent biofilm formation.
Although titanium is resistant to corrosion, localized corrosion in acidic or saline environments can lead to the release of titanium ions, which may cause tissue reactions such as inflammation, fibrosis, or allergic responses [
10]. Monitoring implant longevity, especially in patients with predisposing conditions, is essential.
Finally, although titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces hold promise for improving osseointegration and antimicrobial properties, the long-term effects of these modifications remain inadequately understood. Further research is needed to assess the safety and durability of nanomaterial-based surface modifications [
5].
In a few words, while titanium implants offer superior biocompatibility and strength, challenges such as mechanical mismatch, fatigue failure, biofilm infections, corrosion, and the long-term effects of nanomaterials must be addressed to enhance their longevity and clinical efficacy. Advances in implant design, biological understanding, and surface treatments are critical for improving the long-term success of titanium implants in clinical applications.
4.2. Cost and Accessibility
The high cost of titanium implants, driven by complex manufacturing processes, presents a major challenge in medical and orthopedic applications [
38]. These implants, crucial for enhancing osteointegration and minimizing complications, are often inaccessible in low-resource settings due to financial limitations within healthcare systems and among patients [
38].
Innovative technologies, such as 3D printing, show promise for revolutionizing titanium implant production by enabling highly customized, patient-specific designs. However, these advancements come with substantial upfront costs, including specialized equipment, materials, and expertise [
38]. Additionally, 3D printing involves intricate post-processing to improve surface quality, further raising production expenses.
Moreover, titanium processing presents inherent challenges, such as rapid wear of machining tools and difficulties in achieving high-quality surface finishes, which increase operational costs. The high energy consumption required for processing titanium further complicates cost-efficiency, making it difficult for manufacturers to produce affordable, high-performance implants [
38].
Ultimately, while advancements in titanium plate technology offer significant potential for improving patient outcomes, the associated economic and logistical challenges must be addressed to ensure broader accessibility, particularly in resource-limited healthcare settings.
4.3. Infection Management
Infection control remains a major challenge in titanium implantology, despite advancements in antibacterial coatings. While these coatings enhance antimicrobial properties, postoperative infections, particularly those caused by biofilm-forming bacteria, continue to pose significant risks. Biofilms are resistant to standard antibiotic treatments, complicating infection management and often leading to implant failure. Preventing biofilm formation and ensuring sustained antibacterial efficacy remain critical challenges in titanium implant design [
1,
30].
Although incorporating antibacterial materials into titanium surfaces shows promise, concerns over the safety and biocompatibility of certain agents persist. Some antimicrobial substances may cause toxicity or inflammatory reactions, limiting their clinical applicability. Therefore, research must focus on both the antimicrobial effectiveness and the biocompatibility of these materials to ensure safe long-term use in implants [
1].
Another critical issue is the heat resistance of antibacterial coatings, particularly regarding sterilization. Titanium implants are commonly sterilized by autoclaving, which exposes them to high temperatures and pressures. Coatings must retain their antibacterial properties after sterilization to ensure their ongoing effectiveness in clinical settings [
1].
Additionally, traditional infection control methods, such as irrigation and debridement, may not fully address biofilm-associated infections in titanium implants. As such, novel strategies like advanced antimicrobial coatings, localized drug delivery, or photothermal therapies are being explored to more effectively combat these infections and improve implant success [
1].
In summary, although antibacterial titanium implants present considerable potential for infection prevention, overcoming challenges related to biofilm resistance, material safety, sterilization, and treatment strategies necessitates ongoing innovation and collaboration to improve implant performance and patient outcomes.
4.4. Surface Modification Limitations
Surface modification techniques are vital for enhancing the performance and biocompatibility of titanium implants in osteogenesis applications. However, they present several challenges. A major concern is surface contamination during treatment, which can undermine the desired outcomes such as improved osseointegration, antibacterial properties, or tissue compatibility. Contaminants from residual treatment by-products or environmental interactions can significantly affect implant performance, highlighting the need for strict process control to maintain integrity [
7].
Additionally, the effectiveness of surface modifications is not uniform but depends on various factors, including the specific clinical context and patient variables. Factors such as age, bone quality, and underlying health conditions can influence how implants function post-surgery. As a result, personalized surface modification strategies are needed to address the diverse clinical scenarios encountered in orthopedic, maxillofacial, and spinal surgeries [
5].
Another limitation is the insufficient understanding of the long-term effects of surface treatments on implant stability and performance. While improvements in osseointegration and biocompatibility are often seen initially, the behavior of modified surfaces over time—under mechanical loading and in the biological environment—remains unclear. This knowledge gap is crucial for ensuring the long-term success of implants, especially in load-bearing applications [
7].
Therefore, although surface modifications have enhanced titanium implants, additional research is necessary to gain a deeper understanding of their long-term effects and to optimize protocols tailored to individual patient requirements. This will ensure that titanium implants continue to provide reliable, durable solutions for bone regeneration and osteogenesis.
4.5. Machinability Issues
Titanium alloys, essential in orthopedic and osteogenic applications, present significant machinability challenges due to their unique properties. Their low thermal conductivity, high chemical reactivity, and tendency to adhere to cutting tools complicate the machining process [
38]. Titanium's inability to dissipate heat effectively leads to localized high temperatures, which can degrade both the material and cutting tools. The alloy’s reactivity with tool surfaces accelerates wear, contributing to potential tool failure.
Furthermore, machining titanium often results in poor surface finishes, which can hinder biocompatibility, osseointegration, and the effectiveness of surface treatments designed to promote bone growth. The high energy consumption required during machining also makes the process inefficient and costly. These challenges necessitate the development of advanced machining techniques and tool materials to optimize titanium processing.
Additive manufacturing (AM), particularly 3D printing, has introduced new complexities in machining titanium. While AM allows for customized and complex geometries, the microstructure and surface characteristics of AM-produced titanium differ from those of conventionally machined titanium. This variation requires tailored machining strategies and new approaches to overcome issues like tool wear and surface finish challenges.
To address these machinability issues, ongoing research is essential to explore novel machining technologies, advanced tool materials, and improved post-processing techniques. Such advancements could enhance the efficiency, quality, and cost-effectiveness of titanium implant production, leading to improved outcomes in osteogenesis and other medical applications.
4.6. Regulatory Hurdles and Clinical Translation
The path from laboratory research to clinical application for new implant technologies, particularly in the field of titanium plate surface applications for osteogenesis, is often slow and fraught with complex regulatory hurdles.
Although titanium plates have demonstrated efficacy in certain surgeries, such as cervical spine procedures [
39], introducing new implant designs or surface modifications into clinical practice involves stringent, time-consuming approval processes.
Regulatory approval is crucial, requiring rigorous safety, efficacy, and biocompatibility assessments. These barriers can delay promising innovations, especially those involving novel materials or surface treatments aimed at enhancing osseointegration or antibacterial properties. Furthermore, large-scale, multicenter clinical trials are essential to validate safety and long-term performance, but the high costs, logistical challenges, and lengthy follow-up periods complicate their execution. Regulatory bodies, such as the FDA or EMA, require extensive preclinical and clinical data before granting approval, and the process of demonstrating the safety and efficacy of new materials and designs can be a significant barrier to the timely introduction of these technologies into clinical practice [
31].
Patient diversity and clinical variability add another layer of complexity, requiring personalized approaches in implant development. Surface modifications that promote bone regeneration or prevent bacterial colonization also face additional regulatory scrutiny, as each modification must undergo comprehensive testing for biocompatibility, mechanical integrity, and long-term outcomes.
Overall, despite the significant potential of titanium implant advancements, their clinical translation is impeded by regulatory delays, the necessity for extensive trials, and challenges in personalizing designs. Overcoming these barriers will necessitate close collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and regulatory agencies to expedite the adoption of innovative technologies.
5. The Prospects of Titanium Plate Surface Clinical Application in Osteogenesis
The future of titanium plate surface applications in osteogenesis is promising, with ongoing research and technological advancements paving the way for smarter, more effective, and patient-specific treatments.
5.1. Smart and Customizable Implants
Recent advances in titanium plate surface applications have paved the way for smart, customizable implants that could revolutionize osteogenesis. Smart implants, equipped with real-time sensors, allow continuous monitoring of implant stability, bone healing, and early infection detection, enabling early intervention and improved patient outcomes [
7]. This shift toward proactive care allows for timely adjustments based on real-time data.
In parallel, 3D printing is transforming implant customization, offering personalized solutions that enhance osseointegration and long-term implant stability. These implants can be tailored in terms of shape, porosity, and surface characteristics to optimize bone growth and minimize complications [
2].
Drug-eluting implants also offer significant benefits, releasing controlled doses of therapeutic agents at the site of implantation to promote healing, reduce infection risk, and optimize tissue regeneration. For instance, localized antibiotic delivery can combat infection without systemic effects, while growth factor-releasing surfaces accelerate bone healing [
30].
Looking forward, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are poised to further transform implant design by analyzing patient data to create anatomically precise, biologically tailored implants. These technologies can predict outcomes, identify complications, and personalize treatment plans, improving overall care [
2].
Thus, the integration of smart implants, 3D printing, drug-eluting technologies, and AI is set to redefine titanium implant therapy in osteogenesis, offering precision, efficiency, and patient-centered care.
5.2. Advanced Surface Modification Technologies
Advancements in surface modification technologies are enhancing titanium plates for osteogenesis, particularly by promoting bone regeneration and improving implant integration. Innovations like nanomaterials, bioactive glasses, and growth factors are being incorporated to create bioactive surfaces that accelerate osseointegration and healing. Nanomaterials enhance surface area and cellular interactions, improving osteoblast adhesion and differentiation [
2]. Bioactive glasses release ions to stimulate bone-forming cells, while growth factors like BMPs promote osteogenesis by encouraging mesenchymal stem cells to differentiate into osteoblasts.
Laser treatments are also gaining prominence, creating micro and nanostructures on titanium surfaces that mimic natural bone architecture, enhancing osseointegration and reducing bacterial adhesion [
7]. When combined with coatings or functionalization, these modifications improve bioactivity and infection resistance, offering a robust strategy for implant success.
Surface functionalization with bioactive molecules, such as peptides or proteins, further enhances the biological response by promoting selective cell adhesion, proliferation, and osteogenesis. This method customizes implants to meet individual patient needs, optimizing bone formation at the implant-bone interface [
5].
Overall, the integration of nanomaterials, bioactive coatings, laser treatments, and surface functionalization offers transformative possibilities for titanium implants in osteogenesis. These technologies actively promote bone regeneration, improve implant stability, and reduce complications, marking a significant advancement in implant design for enhanced clinical outcomes.
5.3. Improved Antibacterial Strategies
Titanium implants in osteogenesis face ongoing challenges from implant-related infections, particularly biofilm formation. Recent advancements focus on enhancing antimicrobial properties without using harmful materials like heavy metals. Nano-structured surfaces have shown promise by increasing surface area and introducing physical or chemical cues that prevent bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, providing a biocompatible, sustainable solution for clinical applications [
1,
30].
Additionally, non-toxic antibacterial coatings using natural agents or synthetic peptides offer an effective, safe alternative to metal-based coatings. Bioactive materials, such as silver nanoparticles or antimicrobial polymers, provide long-term protection while maintaining biocompatibility, essential for seamless bone integration.
Immunomodulatory coatings, which regulate the immune response, further improve osteogenesis by reducing inflammation and enhancing cell recruitment to the implant site. These coatings also prevent biofilm formation and bolster the body's natural defenses, reducing post-surgical infections and improving clinical outcomes [
1,
31].
The combination of nano-modifications, non-toxic coatings, and immunomodulatory features provides a comprehensive approach to infection prevention and bone regeneration. By targeting bacterial adhesion and supporting immune response, multi-functional implants promise to enhance implant resilience, reduce infection risk, and improve long-term osteogenic outcomes [
1].
Taking together, these innovative antibacterial strategies offer significant improvements in the safety and performance of titanium implants. By focusing on non-toxic, bioactive coatings, researchers are advancing toward implants that integrate better with bone tissue and provide robust infection protection, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing the need for invasive interventions.
5.4. Bioactive and Biodegradable Materials
The integration of bioactive and biodegradable materials into titanium plates marks a significant advancement in osteogenesis, balancing structural support with biological integration. Combining titanium with biodegradable materials allows implants to provide temporary mechanical stability while supporting tissue regeneration. These materials can also deliver growth factors and therapeutic agents, enhancing healing and reducing complications [
40].
Furthermore, hybrid systems that merge titanium’s strength with biologically favorable materials like bioactive ceramics, polymers, and natural biomolecules are gaining attention. These systems improve osseointegration, reduce implant failure risk, and better meet the physiological needs of bone healing [
34].
Magnesium alloys, which biodegrade and mimic bone properties, are also being explored for temporary implants. Their degradation products, such as magnesium ions, promote bone metabolism and mineralization, offering a physiological alternative to traditional materials [
41].
In addition to hybrid systems and biodegradable alloys, porous titanium structures, designed to mimic bone architecture, improve tissue ingrowth and osseointegration, enhancing implant stability and reducing complications. This approach accelerates healing by promoting vascularization and bone cell growth [
10].
After all, bioactive and biodegradable titanium implants, including hybrid systems, biodegradable alloys, and porous structures, offer promising solutions for bone regeneration. These advancements enhance tissue integration, improve patient outcomes, and reduce complications in osteogenesis applications.
5.5. Enhanced Diagnostic and Monitoring Techniques
Advancements in diagnostic and monitoring techniques are crucial for optimizing the clinical success of titanium implants in osteogenesis. High-resolution imaging, particularly micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), enables precise 3D visualization of the bone-implant interface at micro- and nanoscale levels. This provides valuable insights into osseointegration, implant positioning, and material integration, supporting the development of improved implant designs and surface modifications [
2].
Non-invasive monitoring methods, including in vivo fluorescence imaging, strain gauges, and biomechanical systems, offer continuous, real-time assessments of implant stability and bone healing. These technologies help detect early complications such as implant loosening or infection, allowing for timely interventions that improve patient outcomes and reduce the risk of implant failure [
7].
Together, these innovations are revolutionizing implant technology, facilitating personalized, data-driven patient care and paving the way for advancements in regenerative medicine.
5.6. Refined Surgical Planning Using CAD/CAM
The integration of Computer-Assisted Design and Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technologies has revolutionized the customization of titanium implants for osteogenesis, enhancing surgical planning and precision [
42,
43]. CAD/CAM allows for the design of titanium plates tailored to individual anatomical structures using patient-specific imaging data (CT, MRI), ensuring a precise fit and optimizing mechanical properties, which in turn improves osseointegration and reduces complications [
44].
Moreover, CAD/CAM enables virtual simulation of surgeries, allowing surgeons to test implant positioning and anticipate challenges before the procedure. This preoperative planning improves clinical outcomes, reduces surgical risks, and shortens implant manufacturing time, ultimately lowering costs.
Advancements in CAD/CAM, particularly 3D printing and rapid prototyping, further enhance implant precision, enabling the creation of complex designs that were previously unattainable. These innovations contribute to personalized, patient-centered care, resulting in better outcomes and faster recovery [
45,
46].
Briefly, CAD/CAM technologies are transforming titanium implant fabrication, advancing both the precision and efficacy of osteogenesis surgeries and marking a significant step toward personalized regenerative medicine.
5.7. Integration of Stem Cells
The integration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with titanium implants has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance bone regeneration and osseointegration. MSCs, known for their self-renewal, multi-lineage differentiation, and paracrine signaling, can accelerate bone healing and strengthen the bond between the implant and surrounding tissue [
47]. MSCs derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and other sources have been widely studied for their osteogenic potential, promoting the differentiation of osteoblasts and the formation of a supportive extracellular matrix [
7].
When combined with titanium plates, MSCs enhance osseointegration by promoting vascularization, reducing inflammation, and modulating the immune response to prevent infection and implant rejection. This combination also offers advantages over traditional grafting, facilitating faster recovery and improving implant stability. Recent research highlights the role of bioactive factors released by MSCs in supporting long-term implant function.
The clinical application of MSCs in titanium implant therapies has shown promise in treating non-union fractures, critical-size bone defects, and skeletal disorders. Advancements in tissue engineering have led to the development of composite implants with surface-modified titanium plates that provide an optimal microenvironment for MSC adhesion and differentiation.
Despite these advances, challenges remain, including optimizing stem cell sourcing, controlled delivery, and ensuring long-term clinical success. Issues related to immune rejection, tumorigenesis, and ethical concerns must also be addressed. Nonetheless, MSC integration with titanium implants holds significant potential for advancing bone regeneration therapies and improving patient outcomes in orthopedic and maxillofacial surgeries.
6. Recommendations
To optimize the clinical application of titanium implants for osteogenesis, a set of key recommendations is proposed to enhance efficacy, accessibility, and long-term success.
6.1. Long-Term Outcomes Research
Extended clinical studies are crucial to assess the long-term stability, mechanical integrity, corrosion, and wear resistance of titanium implants, particularly those with advanced surface modifications. Evaluating implant performance across diverse patient populations, including those with comorbidities, will improve understanding of their clinical outcomes [
2].
6.2. Optimize Surface Modifications
Refining surface modification strategies is vital for improving osseointegration while minimizing infection risks. Focus should be placed on developing bioactive coatings and hierarchical surface structures that enhance cellular attachment, differentiation, and implant-bone integration [
10].
6.3. Antibacterial Innovations
Developing safe, biocompatible antibacterial coatings is essential to prevent implant-associated infections, a significant challenge in orthopedic surgeries. Strategies should target biofilm prevention and modulate the immune response to support healing [
1].
6.4. Cost Reduction and Accessibility
Reducing production costs while maintaining quality is critical for widespread adoption. Optimizing manufacturing processes and exploring cost-effective surface modifications can enhance implant accessibility, especially in low- and middle-income regions [
38].
6.5. 3D Printing and Customization
3D printing allows for the creation of patient-specific implants tailored to individual anatomical needs, optimizing functional and biological performance. This personalized approach can improve treatment outcomes for complex fractures and deformities [
2].
6.6. Multidisciplinary Collaboration
Collaboration among material scientists, biomedical engineers, and clinicians is essential to advance implant technologies, surface modifications, and surgical practices. Such interdisciplinary efforts will bridge research and clinical applications [
1].
6.7. Standardize Testing and Evaluation
Establishing standardized testing protocols for titanium implants is crucial to ensure consistent performance evaluation, accounting for mechanical, biological, and immune responses. Rigorous clinical trials are necessary to assess implant safety and efficacy [
5].
6.8. Use Finite Element Analysis
Finite element analysis (FEA) should be integrated in the design phase to optimize mechanical properties and predict implant performance under physiological conditions, improving implant strength and reliability [
34,
36].
6.9. Enhance Machining Technologies
Advancing machining technologies for titanium alloys can improve the precision and cost-effectiveness of implants, especially in additive manufacturing, making high-quality implants more widely available [
38].
6.10. Improve Regulatory Processes
Efficient regulatory processes are essential for accelerating the approval of new materials and surface modifications while ensuring patient safety. Transparent pathways for approval will facilitate the timely integration of innovative technologies [
5].
6.11. Focus on Regenerative Medicine
The integration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with titanium implants can enhance bone healing and osseointegration. Research into stem cell-based therapies could revolutionize titanium implant applications, offering more effective solutions for bone-related injuries [
47].
By implementing these recommendations, advancements in titanium implants for osteogenesis can be achieved, improving clinical outcomes and solidifying their role in modern orthopedic and reconstructive surgery.
7. Conclusion
Titanium plate surfaces have emerged as a transformative innovation in the field of osteogenesis, playing a pivotal role in advancing bone regeneration and implantation technologies. This comprehensive review underscores the remarkable progress achieved in surface modification techniques, antibacterial innovations, and the development of personalized implant designs, all of which have collectively contributed to enhanced clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Despite these advancements, significant challenges persist, including concerns related to long-term implant stability, cost-effectiveness, infection prevention, and the seamless translation of cutting-edge technologies from laboratory research to clinical practice. Looking ahead, the future of titanium plate applications in osteogenesis appears exceptionally promising, driven by the advent of smart implants, next-generation surface modification strategies, refined antibacterial solutions, and the integration of regenerative medicine principles. By addressing these challenges through sustained innovation, robust multidisciplinary collaborations, and a patient-centered approach, the field is poised to not only improve the quality of life for countless patients but also to redefine the boundaries of bone regeneration and tissue engineering. This evolution holds the potential to unlock novel therapeutic avenues and establish new benchmarks in musculoskeletal healthcare.
Authors Contributions
Conceptualization, R.B.N.R.; methodology, R.B.N.R. and G.A.B.; formal analysis, R.B.N.R. and G.A.B.; investigation, R.B.N.R., G.A.B., K.S.L.M., I.F.N.A., J.V.M.O., M.L.A.O., K.D.O., G.E.A., K-B.D., R.T.M.M., D.B.M.M., M.M.T.M., M.B., U.F.N.M., M.N.M.O. and N.T.D.; Data Curation, R.B.N.R., G.A.B., K.S.L.M. and I.F.N.A; writing―original draft presentation, R.B.N.R., writing―review editing, R.B.N.R., G.A.B., K.S.L.M. and I.F.N.A.; supervision, G.A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work received no external funding.
Availability Data
No applicable.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- Lee J-W, Cho J-A, Roh YJ, Han MA, Jeong J-U, Subramanian SA, et al. Antibacterial immunonegative coating with biocompatible materials on a nanostructured titanium plate for orthopedic bone fracture surgery. Biomater Res 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, Nowicka J, Pajączkowska M, Nikodem A, Kuropka P, et al. Three-Dimensional-Printed Modular Titanium Alloy Plates for Osteosynthesis of the Jawbone. Biomedicines 2024, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou W, Wang T, Gan Y, Yang J, Zhu H, Wang A, et al. Effect of micropore/microsphere topography and a silicon-incorporating modified titanium plate surface on the adhesion and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2020, 48, 230–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin H, Zhong X, Zhou N, Huang XP. Mandibular reconstruction after excision of recurrent odontogenic keratocyst using a novel mandibular distraction osteogenesis method– a case report. Head Face Med 2023, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li H, Huang J, Wang Y, Chen Z, Li X, Wei Q, et al. Nanoscale Modification of Titanium Implants Improves Behaviors of Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Osteogenesis in Vivo. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2022, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang Y, Wang X, Miron RJ, Zhang X. The interactions of dendritic cells with osteoblasts on titanium surfaces: an in vitro investigation. Clin Oral Investig 2019, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen YW, Chiang T, Chen IH, Yuh DY, Tseng HY, Wang CW, et al. Titanium Surfaces with a Laser-Produced Microchannel Structure Enhance Pre-Osteoblast Proliferation, Maturation, and Extracellular Mineralization In Vitro. Int J Mol Sci 2024, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu X, Chen S, Ding H, Tsoi JKH. Antifungal Ability of Novel Silane on Titanium Implant Surface. Coatings 2024, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsuura T, Komatsu K, Suzumura T, Stavrou S, Juanatas M Lou, Park W, et al. Enhanced functionality and migration of human gingival fibroblasts on vacuum ultraviolet light-treated titanium: An implication for mitigating cellular stress to improve peri-implant cellular reaction. J Prosthodont Res 2024. [CrossRef]
- Abd-Elaziem W, Mohammed MM, Yehia HM, Sebaey TA, Khan T. Porous Titanium for Medical Implants. Multidisciplinary Materials Chronicles 2024, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu B, Tang Y, Wang K, Zhou X, Xiang L. Nanostructured Titanium Implant Surface Facilitating Osseointegration from Protein Adsorption to Osteogenesis: The Example of TiO2 NTAs. Int J Nanomedicine 2022, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anitua E, Piñas L, Murias A, Prado R, Tejero R. Effects of calcium ions on titanium surfaces for bone regeneration. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 2015, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wehner C, Laky M, Shokoohi-Tabrizi HA, Behm C, Moritz A, Rausch-Fan X, et al. Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation of different titanium surfaces on osteoblast response. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2021, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang T, Zhang X, Mao M, Li J, Wei T, Sun H. Chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite coatings on porous Ti6Al4V titanium implants: In vitro and in vivo studies. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2020, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraioli R, Tsimbouri PM, Fisher LE, Nobbs AH, Su B, Neubauer S, et al. Towards the cell-instructive bactericidal substrate: Exploring the combination of nanotopographical features and integrin selective synthetic ligands. Sci Rep 2017, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lotz EM, Berger MB, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation on microstructured titanium surfaces by semaphorin 3A. Bone 2020, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng J, Cohen DJ, Berger MB, Sabalewski EL, McClure MJ, Boyan BD, et al. Osseointegration of Titanium Implants in a Botox-Induced Muscle Paralysis Rat Model Is Sensitive to Surface Topography and Semaphorin 3A Treatment. Biomimetics 2023, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song A, Jiang F, Wang Y, Wang M, Wu Y, Zheng Y, et al. Semaphorin3A promotes osseointegration of titanium implants in osteoporotic rabbits. Clin Oral Investig 2022, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirschneck C, Wolf F, Cieplik F, Blanck-Lubarsch M, Proff P, Schröder A. Impact of NSAID etoricoxib on side effects of orthodontic tooth movement. Annals of Anatomy 2020, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virdi AS, Irish J, Sena K, Liu M, Ke HZ, McNulty MA, et al. Sclerostin antibody treatment improves implant fixation in a model of severe osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American 2015, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng H, Xiong W, Fang Z, Guan H, Wu W, Li Y, et al. Strontium (Sr) and silver (Ag) loaded nanotubular structures with combined osteoinductive and antimicrobial activities. Acta Biomater 2016, 31, 388–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Susin C, Qahash M, Polimeni G, Lu PH, Prasad HS, Rohrer MD, et al. Alveolar ridge augmentation using implants coated with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-7 (rhBMP-7/rhOP-1): Histological observations. J Clin Periodontol 2010, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Gareta E, Hua J, Orera A, Kohli N, Knowles JC, Blunn GW. Biomimetic surface functionalization of clinically relevant metals used as orthopaedic and dental implants. Biomedical Materials (Bristol) 2018, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuroda S, Wazen R, Moffatt P, Tanaka E, Nanci A. Mechanical stress induces bone formation in the maxillary sinus in a short-term mouse model. Clin Oral Investig 2013, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Marquez D, Terhaer K, Scheinemann P, Mirnajafizadeh A, Carty CP, Stewart RA. Quality by Design for industry translation: Three-dimensional risk assessment failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis for additively manufactured patient-specific implants. Engineering Reports 2020, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schliephake H, Rublack J, Aeckerle N, Förster A, Schwenzer B, Reichert J, et al. In vivo effect of immobilisation of bone morphogenic protein 2 on titanium implants through nano-anchored oligonucleotides. Eur Cell Mater 2015, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu Y, Tang H, Liu L, He Q, Zhao L, Huang Z, et al. Biomimetic titanium implant coated with extracellular matrix enhances and accelerates osteogenesis. Nanomedicine 2020, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soro N, Brodie EG, Abdal-hay A, Alali AQ, Kent D, Dargusch MS. Additive manufacturing of biomimetic Titanium-Tantalum lattices for biomedical implant applications. Mater Des 2022, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oltean-Dan D, Dogaru GB, Jianu EM, Riga S, Tomoaia-Cotisel M, Mocanu A, et al. Biomimetic composite coatings for activation of titanium implant surfaces: Methodological approach and in vivo enhanced osseointegration. Micromachines (Basel) 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang X, Chen NF, Huang XL, Lin S, Chen QQ, Wang WM, et al. Iodine-doped TiO2 nanotube coatings: a technique for enhancing the antimicrobial properties of titanium surfaces against Staphylococcus aureus. J Orthop Surg Res 2023, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang H, Yuan Y, Xue H, Yu R, Jin X, Wu X, et al. Reprogramming mitochondrial metabolism of macrophages by miRNA-released microporous coatings to prevent peri-implantitis. J Nanobiotechnology 2023, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu F jing, Liu Y cheng, Hu Y cheng, Ding X kun, Miao J. Novel Three-Holed Titanium Plate Fixation during Open Door Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Comparison with Conventional Titanium Plate. Orthop Surg 2023, 15, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang W, Cai X, Liu X, Wang G, Kang H, Qian S. Special contoured pelvic brim reconstruction titanium plate combined with trans-plate buttress screws (quadrilateral screws) for acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvement through the anterior ilioinguinal approach. Front Surg 2024, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fang S, Zhang L, Yang Y, Wang Y, Guo J, Mi L. Finite element analysis comparison of Type 42A2 fracture fixed with external titanium alloy locking plate and traditional external fixation frame. J Orthop Surg Res 2023, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atik C, Atik D. The Results of Rigid Titanium Plate Reinforcement and Only Conventional Wire Methods in Sternal Fixation in Morbidly Obese Patients. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2023, 38, e20230145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu H, Wu J, Xie H, Wen W, Xu H, Du J, et al. Biomechanical behaviour of tension-band-reconstruction titanium plate in open-door laminoplasty: a study based on finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu S, Zhang W, Shi J. Evaluation of the Efficacy of Three Times Titanium Plate Gradual Fixation Method in the Treatment of Extracapsular Condylar Fractures. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2024, 35, 1289–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polishetty A, Bolar G, Nomani J, Littelfair G. Evaluating productivity characteristics of laser engineered net shaping titanium alloy. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez SG, Ginebra M-P, Gil FJ, Barraquer RI, Manero JM. Antibacterial and cytocompatible silver coating for titanium Boston Keratoprosthesis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu M, Li M, Ma R, Li X, Ren X, Du L, et al. Biomechanical analysis of titanium-alloy and biodegradable implants in dual plate osteosynthesis for AO/ASIF type 33-C2 fractures. Heliyon 2024, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shang Y, Bi Y, Cao Y, Wang Y. Finite element analysis of titanium anatomic plate and titanium reconstructive plate for treatment of extra-articular fractures of the scapula. J Orthop Surg Res 2023, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun Y, Du W, Xu C, Lin Y, Liu X, Luo E. Applications of Computer-Aided Design/Manufacturing Technology in Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2020, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- del Castillo R, Ata-Ali J. The clinical use of computer aided designed/computer aided manufactured titanium nitride coated implant abutments: Surgical and prosthetic considerations—A case series. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 2023, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verschueren J, Meuffels DE, Bron EE, Klein S, Kleinrensink GJ, Verhaar JAN, et al. Possibility of quantitative T2-mapping MRI of cartilage near metal in high tibial osteotomy: A human cadaver study. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 2018, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang J, Wu P, Liu HL, Zhang L, Liu LP, Ma CF, et al. Polyetheretherketone versus titanium CAD-CAM framework for implant-supported fixed complete dentures: a retrospective study with up to 5-year follow-up. J Prosthodont Res 2022, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donker VJJ, Raghoebar GM, Jensen-Louwerse C, Vissink A, Meijer HJA. Monolithic zirconia single tooth implant-supported restorations with CAD/CAM titanium abutments in the posterior region: A 1-year prospective case series study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2022, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng L, Li Y, Xia Q, Meng MH, Ye ZY, Tang ZL, et al. Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) enhances the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Bioengineered 2021, 12, 7033–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).