Submitted:
06 February 2025
Posted:
07 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Challenges in IT Students’ Engagement with Mathematics.
2.2. Related Pedagogical Models for Enhancing Mathematics Relevance Among Students
3. Methodology
3.1. Overview of Methodology
3.2. Participants’ Selection
3.3. The Proposed Framework
3.3.1. The Perception Analysis and Diagnostic Phase (Weeks 1-3)
3.3.2. The Contextualized Integration and Applied Learning Phase (Weeks 4-6)
3.3.3. Experiential Simulation and Performance Enhancement Phase (Weeks 7-10)
3.3.4. Perception Shift Evaluation and Continuous Learning Phase (Weeks 11-12)
4. Results & Analysis
4.1. Pre-Intervention Results
4.1.1. Mathematics Competency Levels of Participants
4.1.2. Participants’ Perceptions of the Relevance of Mathematics in IT Education
4.1.3. Experts’ Assessments of Participant’s Perceptions on the Relevance of Mathematics in IT Education
4.2. Post-Intervention Results
4.2.1. Mathematics Competency Levels of Participants
4.2.2. Participants’ Perceptions of the Relevance of Mathematics in IT Education
4.2.3. Experts’ Assessments of Participant’s Perceptions on the Relevance of Mathematics in IT Education
4.3. Paired Samples T-Test Analysis
- (i)
- Means scores for all post-intervention cases are higher than their corresponding pre-intervention scores, which imply remarkable improvements in the mathematics competencies of students, enhancement of the recognition and relevance students accord mathematics concepts in IT education, and validation by experts on students’ stronger understanding, confidence, and industry alignment of mathematics principles.
- (ii)
- The generally lower post-intervention standard deviations in all 3 tables imply that the variability in the significantly improved results regarding students’ mathematics competence, their perceptions, and experts’ validation, decreased. In the case of mathematics competence, this indicates a higher level of uniformity in competence across learners, irrespective of their initial competency level. Again, for the participants’ self-reported perceptions, such a low standard deviation implies that there is a consensus amongst them on the positive shift of their perceptions. Finally, this also means that experts who rated these students, have a uniform agreement on the progress of the sample population.
- (iii)
- (iv)
- In paired samples t-test analysis, whenever a p-value<0.05 it implies significant change after the implementation of an intervention and hence confirms the intervention’s efficiency(Keeler & Curtis, 2023a, 2023b; Ottwell et al., 2023; Tzenios, 2023; Vejle Sørensen et al., 2023). Therefore, with p-values being 0.00 (hence, p-value<0.05) in Table 10, Table 11, and Table 12, the improvements in all post-intervention perceptions and competence of participants are not due to chance but are statistically significant.
5. Summary & Conclusion
Funding
Data Availability Statements
Competing Interest
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Informed Consent
References
- Toromade, A. O., Orakwe, C. U., & Okonkwo, C. A. (2024). Gamified Mathematics Education (GME): A new pedagogical model for digital learning platforms. Open Access Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 8(2), 021–031. [CrossRef]
- Annisa, M. N., & Darmiyati, D. (2024). Mathematics Learning Outcomes and Student Learning Motivation and Teacher Activities in the Integration of Problem Based Learning, Rhealistic Mathematic Education and Snowball Throwing Learning Models. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 9(2), 131. [CrossRef]
- Betty, W. N. V., & Ling Shing, W. (2024). Literature Review on the Teaching Engineering Mathematics: Issues and Solutions for Student Engagement. INTI Journal, 2024(1). [CrossRef]
- Castillo, D., Carrión, J., Chamba, C., Jiménez, Y., Rodríguez-Álvarez, M. J., & Lakshminarayanan, V. (2024). Teaching Math: A Review of Effective Teaching and Learning Strategies in Higher Education. [CrossRef]
- Chance, S., Fayyaz, F., Campbell, A. L., Pitterson, N. P., & Nawaz, S. (2024). Guest Editorial Special Issue on Conceptual Learning of Mathematics-Intensive Concepts in Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education, 67(4), 491–498. [CrossRef]
- Czaplinski, I., Turner, I. W., Helmstedt, K., Corry, P., & Mallet, D. G. (2021). Industry-based, transdisciplinary, complex problems as realistic settings for applying the M in STEM. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(5), 653–668. [CrossRef]
- Febriani, N. I., & Elfrianto, E. (2023). Strategies for Overcoming Difficulties in Learning Mathematics. EDUCTUM: Journal Research, 2(4), 11–15. [CrossRef]
- Harefa, D., & Fatolosa Hulu. (2024). MATHEMATICS LEARNING STRATEGIES THAT SUPPORT PANCASILA MORAL EDUCATION: PRACTICAL APPROACHES FOR TEACHERS. Afore : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 51–60. [CrossRef]
- Inderjeet, & Bhardwaj, R. (2024). AI Integrated Model Design for Education System for Analytical Computation (Mathematics). 2024 4th International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), 1412–1417. [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, H. A., & Myrzayev, R. S. (2024). FEATURES OF TEACHING MATHEMATICS TO STUDENTS OF IT SPECIALTIES: TASKS, LEVELS, PROBLEMS. МАТЕМАТИКА, ФИЗИКА ЖӘНЕ ИНФОРМАТИКАНЫ ОҚЫТУДЫҢ ӨЗЕКТІ МӘСЕЛЕЛЕРІ, 1, 6–15. [CrossRef]
- Keeler, C., & Curtis, A. C. (2023a). Introduction to Statistical Hypothesis Testing in Nursing Research. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 123(7), 53–55. [CrossRef]
- Keeler, C., & Curtis, A. C. (2023b). Introduction to Statistical Hypothesis Testing in Nursing Research. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 123(7), 53–55. [CrossRef]
- Krishnaveni Veeranan, Pandian, V., Thamaraiselvi, & Antonyraj Martin. (2024). Impact of Mathematical Models in IT System Design and Optimization. International Journal of Information Technology, Research and Applications, 3(1), 1–11. [CrossRef]
- Mandailina, V. (2024). Examining the Influence of Lecturer Support and Classroom Environment on Mathematical Resilience, Self-Efficacy, and Self-Confidence. Jurnal Derivat: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 168–175. [CrossRef]
- Matzakos, N., Doukakis, S., & Moundridou, M. (2023). Learning Mathematics with Large Language Models. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(20), 51–71. [CrossRef]
- Mayang Nabila, & Yahfizham Yahfizham. (2024). Analisis Berpikir Komputasi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Matematika. Bilangan : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 2(4), 41–49. [CrossRef]
- Meitei, A. P., Singh, Kh. K., & Singh, N. I. (2024). Practical Pedagogical Approaches: Integrating Play-based and Experiential Learning at Pre-Primary Education as per NEP 2020 and NCF-FS 2022. Edumania-An International Multidisciplinary Journal, 02(04), 174–193. [CrossRef]
- Murangira, F., Uworwabayeho, A., & Twagilimana, I. (2024). Teachers’ Perceptions towards Practical Instruction Approach in Teaching Mathematics: A case of Selected Teachers in Ugandan Secondary Schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(10), 415–434. [CrossRef]
- My Nguyen, H. T., Chau Nguyen, G. T., Hong Thai, L. T., Truong, D. T., & Nguyen, B. N. (2024). Teaching Mathematics Through Project-Based Learning in K-12 Schools: A Systematic Review of Current Practices, Barriers, and Future Developments. TEM Journal, 2054–2065. [CrossRef]
- Nascimento, J. C. Q. do. (2024). The Use of Software in Mathematics Activities at School. RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber, 1(1). [CrossRef]
- Oichueva, R. R., & Atabaev, S. K. (2024). ROLE OF MATHEMATICAL MODEL IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION. Вестник Иссык-Кульскoгo Университета. [CrossRef]
- Omosa, E. (2024). Innovative Pedagogical Practices in Mathematics Education (pp. 67–96). [CrossRef]
- Orhan, F. D. (2024). Computational Math Modeling and AI Optimization for Better Decision-Making: Applications in Machine Learning. Next Frontier For Life Sciences and AI, 8(1), 79. [CrossRef]
- Ottwell, R., Failla, O., Pitman, C., Hughes, G., Diedring, T., Regalbuto, A., Stammen, M., & Hartwell, M. (2023). Assessing the Effects of Lowering the P Value Threshold From .05 to .01 in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Top Dermatology Journals: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 89(3), AB17. [CrossRef]
- Oyaro, S. M., Mwaura, P. A., Mwangi, C. N., & Muriithi Ireri, A. (2024). Achievement Goals, Perceived Teacher Support, and Mathematics Achievement: The Mediating Role of Academic Disidentification. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, 07(11). [CrossRef]
- P. Sandhya, Dr. (2024). DATA SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING: UNVEILING INSIGHTS THROUGH NUMBERS. In Futuristic Trends in Contemporary Mathematics & Applications Volume 3 Book 2 (pp. 53–66). Iterative International Publishers, Selfypage Developers Pvt Ltd. [CrossRef]
- Peña-Becerril, M., Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Buentello-Montoya, D. A., Ávila, J. C., & Amado-Moranchel, N. (2023). Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Mathematics Learning Through Contextualized Problems in Professional Practice: Comparative Analysis of Traditional Qualitative and Data Mining Techniques. 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–5. [CrossRef]
- Perminov, E. A., & Testov, V. A. (2024). Mathematisation of specialised disciplines as the basis for fundamentalising IT training in universities. The Education and Science Journal, 26(7), 12–43. [CrossRef]
- Rajendrakumar Vilas Thorat. (2024). Mathematics in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 362–366. [CrossRef]
- Tang, M. D., & Vo, N. H. (2024). Enhancing students mathematical competence in learning spatial geometry in grade 11 through practical and experiential activities. Dong Thap University Journal of Science, 13(7), 99–108. [CrossRef]
- Tzenios, N. (2023). Statistical Analysis in Research. [CrossRef]
- Uwitonze, S., & Andala, H. O. (2024). Effect of Teachers Attitudes towards Teaching on Students’ Performance in Mathematics Subject in Public Day Secondary Schools in Rwanda: A Case of Huye District. African Journal of Empirical Research, 5(4), 761–771. [CrossRef]
- Vejle Sørensen, C., Isberg Nielsen, N., Pólsdóttir Houen, J., & Glintborg, C. (2023). EVALUERING AF TVÆRFAGLIG INTERVENTION TIL PERSONER MED LÆNGEREVARENDE FØLGER EFTER HJERNERYSTELSE – AALBORG KOMMUNES ”TIDLIG INDSATS”. Psyke & Logos, 44(1), 89–105. [CrossRef]
- Vos, P., Wiik, A., & Hernandez-Martinez, P. (2024). “Imagine, maths is used anywhere, and we don’t get to know this”—upper secondary students and the relevance of advanced mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 9. [CrossRef]
- Widianti, Y. M., Alfarabi, A., & Widyaningtyas, R. (2024). Policy Analysis of Merdeka Curriculum: Readiness to Fulfill Industry Needs. Journal of Office Administration : Education and Practice, 4(1), 34–44. [CrossRef]
- Zahoruiko, L., Martianova, T., Al-Hiari, M., Polovenko, L., Kovalchuk, M., Merinova, S., Shakhov, V., & Yeraliyeva, B. (2024). MATHEMATICAL MODEL AND STRUCTURE OF A NEURAL NETWORK FOR DETECTION OF CYBER ATTACKS ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS. Informatyka, Automatyka, Pomiary w Gospodarce i Ochronie Środowiska, 14(3), 49–55. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z. (2024). Research on Teaching Strategies for Project-Based Learning in Upper Elementary School Mathematics Culture. Education Insights, 1(4), 12–18. [CrossRef]











| Academic Level | Diploma in IT | BSc. in IT | Total Number | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 | 15 | 46 | 61 | 40% |
| 200 | 19 | 21 | 40 | 26% |
| 300 | -- | 29 | 29 | 19% |
| 400 | -- | 22 | 22 | 15% |
| IT Field of Application | Corresponding Field of Mathematics | Specific Application | Experts |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. |
Linear Algebra, Calculus, Probability, and Statistics. |
|
|
| Cryptography and Cybersecurity | Modular arithmetic, prime numbers, number theory, and algebraic structures. |
|
|
| Network and Communication Systems. | Graph theory, probability, and Fourier analysis. |
|
|
| Signal Processing and Multimedia Systems. | Fourier transforms, differential equations, and linear algebra. |
|
|
| Software Engineering and Development. | Discrete mathematics, set theory, and Boolean logic. |
|
|
| Data Science and Big Data Analytics. | Statistics, probability, and linear algebra. |
|
|
| Algorithm Design and Optimization. | Graph theory, combinatorics, and complexity theory. |
|
|
| Mathematics Concept | Real-Word Use in IT | Technologies/Tools Used for Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| Matrix Operation | 3D Graphics Rendering. | OpenGL, TensorFlow. |
| Boolean Logic | Database Querying (SQL). | MySQL, PostgreSQL. |
| Number Theory, Modular Arithmetic. | RSA Encryption, hashing algorithms. | Python Cryptography libraries, OpenSSL. |
| Set Theory | Schema Design and Data Relationships in Databases | Oracle Database, PostgreSQL, MS Access. |
| Fourier Analysis | Audio and video encoding (MP3 and MP4), data compression. | MATLAB, FFmpeg. |
| Graph Theory | Developing Routing Protocols and Social Network analysis. | GraphX, NetworkX |
| Differential Equations | Robotics and fluid simulations. | MATLAB, Wolfram Mathematica |
| Test Section | Mean Score (%) | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Algebra | 45.2 | 12.5 |
| Calculus | 38.4 | 10.2 |
| Probability & Statistics | 42.1 | 11.18 |
| Discrete Mathematics | 40.5 | 10.7 |
| Perception Category | Mean Score (out of 5) | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics is relevant to IT. | 2.3 | 0.9 |
| Confidence in applying Mathematics. | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Motivation to learn Mathematics. | 2.5 | 1.0 |
| Awareness of Mathematics in IT fields. | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| Interest in using Mathematics in IT implementations. | 1.9 | 1.2 |
| Perception Category | Mean Score (out of 5) | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived relevance of mathematics in IT. | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| Confidence in applying mathematical concepts. | 2.3 | 0.9 |
| Understanding of mathematical applications in IT. | 2.4 | 0.7 |
| Willingness to engage in mathematics learning. | 2.5 | 0.9 |
| Alignment of participant skills with industry demands. | 2.5 | 0.9 |
| Test Section | Mean Score (%) | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Algebra | 68.2 | 9.5 |
| Calculus | 62.7 | 8.9 |
| Probability & Statistics | 65.1 | 9.3 |
| Discrete Mathematics | 61.4 | 9.1 |
| Perception Category | Mean Score (out of 5) | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics is relevant to IT. | 4.1 | 0.6 |
| Confidence in applying mathematics. | 3.8 | 0.8 |
| Motivation to learn mathematics. | 4.0 | 0.7 |
| Awareness of math in IT fields. | 3.9 | 0.7 |
| Interest in using mathematics in Implementations. | 3.7 | 0.9 |
| Perception Category | Mean Score (out of 5) | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived relevance of Mathematics in IT. | 4.3 | 0.5 |
| Confidence in applying Mathematical concepts. | 4.0 | 0.6 |
| Understanding of Mathematical Applications in IT. | 4.1 | 0.5 |
| Willingness to engage in Mathematics learning. | 4.2 | 0.4 |
| Alignment of participant skills with industry demands. | 4.0 | 0.6 |
| Test Scores | N | Mean | St. Dev. | df | t-stat. | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Algebra | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 45.2 | 12.5 | 151 | -18.061 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 68.2 | 9.5 | ||||
|
Calculus | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 38.4 | 10.2 | 151 | -22.13 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 62.7 | 8.9 | ||||
|
Probability & Statistics | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 42.1 | 11.18 | 151 | -19.499 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 65.1 | 9.3 | ||||
|
Discrete Mathematics | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 40.5 | 10.7 | 151 | -18.344 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 61.4 | 9.1 | ||||
| Perception Scores | N | Mean | St. Dev. | df | t-stat. | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mathematics is relevant to IT | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 151 | -20.516 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 4.1 | 0.6 | ||||
|
Confidence in applying mathematics | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 151 | -16.316 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 3.8 | 0.8 | ||||
|
Motivation to learn mathematics. | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 151 | -15.150 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 4.0 | 0.7 | ||||
|
Awareness of math in IT fields | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 151 | -20.876 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 3.9 | 0.7 | ||||
|
Interest in using mathematics in Implementations | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 151 | -14.795 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 3.7 | 0.9 | ||||
| Perception Scores | N | Mean | St. Dev. | df | t-stat. | Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Perceived relevance of Mathematics in IT. | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 151 | -27.444 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 4.3 | 0.5 | ||||
|
Confidence in applying Mathematical concepts | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 151 | -19.377 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 4.0 | 0.6 | ||||
|
Understanding of Mathematical Applications in IT | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 151 | -24.364 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 4.1 | 0.5 | ||||
|
Willingness to engage in Mathematics learning | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 151 | -21.281 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 4.2 | 0.4 | ||||
|
Alignment of participant skills with industry demands | ||||||
| Pre-intervention | 152 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 151 | -17.097 | 0.00 |
| Post-intervention | 4.0 | 0.6 | ||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
