Submitted:
04 February 2025
Posted:
05 February 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Sample Collection
Isolation of Bacillus Species
Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Bacillus Species
Rearing and Larvicidal Bioassay of Aedes aegypti
Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ajuna, H. B., Lim, H. I., Moon, J. H., Won, S. J., Choub, V., Choi, S. I., … & Ahn, Y. S. (2024). The prospect of antimicrobial peptides from Bacillus species with biological control potential against insect pests and diseases of economic importance in agriculture, forestry and fruit tree production. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 38(1), 2312115.
- Almeida, J. S., Mohanty, A. K., Kerkar, S., Hoti, S. L., & Kumar, A. (2020). Current status and future prospects of bacilli-based vector control. Asian pacific journal of tropical medicine, 13(12), 525-534.
- Behardien, L. (2008). Investigation into the bacterial contamination in a spring water distribution system and the application of bioremediation as treatment technology (Doctoral dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology).
- Behardien, L., Paulse, A., Jackson, V., Khan, S., & Khan, W. Investigation into the microbial contamination in a spring water distribution system, Western Cape, South Africa. African Journal of Microbiology Research 2011, 5(20), 3200–3214.
- Bravo, A., Gill, S. S., & Soberón, M. (2007). Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon, 49(4), 423-435.
- Brühl, C. A., Després, L., Frör, O., Patil, C. D., Poulin, B., Tetreau, G., & Allgeier, S. (2020). Environmental and socioeconomic effects of mosquito control in Europe using the biocide Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (Bti). Science of the total environment, 724, 137800.
- Federici, B. A., Park, H. W., & Bideshi, D. K. (2010). Overview of the basic biology of Bacillus thuringiensis with emphasis on genetic engineering of bacterial larvicides for mosquito control. Open Toxinology Journal, 3(2), 83-100.
- Harirchi, S., Sar, T., Ramezani, M., Aliyu, H., Etemadifar, Z., Nojoumi, S. A., … & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2022). Bacillales: from taxonomy to biotechnological and industrial perspectives. Microorganisms, 10(12), 2355.
- Ibiene, A. A., Lawson, S. D., Enyinnaya, S. O., Amos, F. E., Nnodim, L., & Uzah, G. A (2021). Isolation and Use of Bacillus thuringiensis for the Production of Bio-Insecticide in Control of Mosquito Larvae.
- Jensen, G. S., Cash, H. A., Farmer, S., & Keller, D. (2017). Inactivated probiotic Bacillus coagulans GBI-30 induces complex immune activating, anti-inflammatory, and regenerative markers in vitro. Journal of inflammation research, 107-117.
- Karačić, V., Miljaković, D., Marinković, J., Ignjatov, M., Milošević, D., Tamindžić, G., & Ivanović, M. (2024). Bacillus species: Excellent biocontrol agents against tomato diseases. Microorganisms, 12(3), 457.
- Khodavirdipour, A., Chamanrokh, P., Alikhani, M. Y., & Alikhani, M. S. (2022). Potential of Bacillus suBtilis against SARS-CoV-2–a sustainable drug development perspective. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13, 718786.
- Lacey, L. A. (2007). Bacillus thuringiensis serovar israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus for mosquito control. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 23(1), 133-163.
- Malakar, C., Deka, S., & Kalita, M. C. (2023). Role of biosurfactants in biofilm prevention and disruption. In Advancements in Biosurfactants Research (pp. 481-501). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Miranda, L. S., Rudd, S. R., Mena, O., Hudspeth, P. E., Barboza-Corona, J. E., Park, H. W., & Bideshi, D. K. (2024). The perpetual vector mosquito threat and its eco-friendly nemeses. Biology, 13(3), 182.
- Narkhede, C. P., Patil, C. D., Suryawanshi, R. K., Koli, S. H., Mohite, B. V., & Patil, S. V. (2017). Synergistic effect of certain insecticides combined with Bacillus thuringiensis on mosquito larvae. Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research, 49(1).
- Prabhakaran, V. S., Park, K. B., Kim, K. Y., Jung, W. J., & Han, Y. S (2025). The role of Bacillus species in the management of plant-parasitic nematodes. Frontiers in Microbiology, 15, 1510036.
- Schorkopf, D. L. P., Spanoudis, C. G., Mboera, L. E., Mafra-Neto, A., Ignell, R., & Dekker, T. (2016). Combining attractants and larvicides in biodegradable matrices for sustainable mosquito vector control. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 10(10), e0005043.
- Silva-Filha, M. H. N. L., Romão, T. P., Rezende, T. M. T., Carvalho, K. D. S., Gouveia de Menezes, H. S., Alexandre do Nascimento, N., … & Bravo, A. (2021). Bacterial toxins active against mosquitoes: Mode of action and resistance. Toxins, 13(8), 523.
- Thérien, M., Kiesewalter, H. T., Auria, E., Charron-Lamoureux, V., Wibowo, M., Maróti, G., … & Beauregard, P. B. (2020). Surfactin production is not essential for pellicle and root-associated biofilm development of Bacillus suBtilis. Biofilm, 2, 100021.
- Wang, X., Hao, G., Zhou, M., Chen, M., Ling, H., & Shang, Y. (2023). Secondary metabolites of Bacillus suBtilis L2 show antiviral activity against pseudorabies virus. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, 1277782.
- Zeriouh, H., de Vicente, A., Pérez-García, A., & Romero, D. (2014). Surfactin triggers biofilm formation of B acillus suBtilis in melon phylloplane and contributes to the biocontrol activity. Environmental microbiology, 16(7), 2196-2211.





| Samples | Samples code | Temperature (°C) | Relative Humidity (RH) | Depth (cm) |
| Water | W | 55 | 8.5 | All levels |
| Wet shore soil | SW | 37 | 8.5 | 100 |
| Spring Sediment | SS | 65 | 8.3 | 18 |
| Strain | Source | Accession number |
| Bacillus licheniformis | SW | PQ566651 |
| Bacillus tequilensis | SW | PQ566655 |
| Bacillus stercoris | SW | PQ566661 |
| Bacillus sonorensis | W | PQ566663 |
| Bacillus paramycoides | W | PQ566660 |
| Bacillus rugosus | SW | PQ566654 |
| Bacillus species | LC50 (Lower- Upper) (ppm) |
LC90 (Lower- Upper) (ppm) |
Slope ± SE | Chi 2 |
| Bacillus sonorensis | 19.72 (5.33-28.85) | 132.96 (96.88-586.35) | 1.56±0.15 | 3.62 |
| Bacillus paramycoides | 23.41 (9.86-34.75) | 148.42(104.26-439.18) | 1.59±0.15 | 4.02 |
| Bacillus tequilensis | 48.17 (37.26-60.69) | 636.17(379.67-1454.21) | 1.14±0.14 | 3.75 |
| Bacillus rugosus | 55.93 (44.78-69.18) | 579.04(364.11-1187.81) | 1.26±0.14 | 4.17 |
| Bacillus licheniformis | 87.44 (73.15-106.87) | 599.96(395.03-1130.31) | 1.53±0.17 | 1.66 |
| Bacillus stercoris | 98.29 (88.77-108.18) | 274.69(230.81-350.44) | 2.87±0.27 | 2.16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).