Submitted:
20 January 2025
Posted:
21 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a potential complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, some studies suggest that THA not only alleviates joint pain but also resolves LBP in up to 88.2% of patients. Most of these observations are limited to short-term follow-up. This study investigates the long-term relationship between THA and LBP, challenging the notion that THA resolves LBP. A retrospective review was conducted on 236 patients who underwent THA (2010–2020). Multiple statistical models were applied, including unadjusted unmatched, adjusted unmatched, adjusted matched, and target trial emulation with 7887 subjects, to evaluate LBP incidence. Of the 236 patients, 119 developed postoperative LBP. The unadjusted unmatched analysis showed a relative risk (RR) of 2.23(95%CI:1.5–3.2). Adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and recruitment period reduced the RR to 1.64(95%CI:1.0–2.6). Adjusted matched analysis showed an RR of 1.09(95%CI:0.4–3.0), while the target trial emulation simulated an RR of 1.03(95%CI:0.7–1.8), indicating no significant differences. Despite an apparent initial association, adjusted analyses do not support a significant long-term relationship between THA and LBP. No reduction in postoperative LBP incidence was observed, suggesting THA is safe regarding LBP risk but lacks a curative effect. Rigorous confounding adjustment is essential in retrospective studies.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
Study Design
Participants and Follow-Up
Variables and Data Sources
Data Analysis
Sensitivity Analysis
Ethical Aspects
3. Results
Baseline Characteristics and Initial Follow-Up Period
Survival Function and HR of LBP During 5 Years of Follow-Up
Sensitivity Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| HOA | Hip osteoarthritis |
| THA | Total hip arthroplasty |
| LBP | Low back pain |
| BMI | Body mass index |
| HR | Hazard ratio |
References
- Dagenais S, Garbedian S, Wai EK. Systematic review of the prevalence of radiographic primary hip osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:623–37. [CrossRef]
- Lo J, Chan L, Flynn S. A systematic review of the incidence, prevalence, costs, and activity and work limitations of amputation, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, back pain, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, stroke, and traumatic brain injury in the United States: A 2019 update. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021;102:115–31. [CrossRef]
- Fan Z, Yan L, Liu H, Li X, Fan K, Liu Q, et al. The prevalence of hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther 2023;25:51. [CrossRef]
- Hoaglund FT, Steinbach LS. Primary osteoarthritis of the hip: etiology and epidemiology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001;9:320–7. [CrossRef]
- Skousgaard SG, Hjelmborg J, Skytthe A, Brandt LPA, Möller S, Overgaard S. Probability and heritability estimates on primary osteoarthritis of the hip leading to total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide population based follow-up study in Danish twins. Arthritis Res Ther 2015;17:336. [CrossRef]
- BASSAMAT O. AHMED D.N.Sc. EMHMS, ABD EL-NABY D.N.Sc. AG. Discharge needs of patients after total hip arthroplasty. Med J Cairo Univ 2018;86:179–85. [CrossRef]
- Zhang B, Rao S, Mekkawy KL, Rahman R, Sarfraz A, Hollifield L, et al. Risk factors for pain after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Arthroplasty 2023;5:19. [CrossRef]
- Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hillibrand A, Goldberg G, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Back pain and total hip arthroplasty: A prospective natural history study. Clin Orthop Relat Res [Internet]. 2010;468(5):1325-30. [CrossRef]
- Ben-Galim P, Ben-Galim T, Rand N. Hip-spine syndrome: the effect of total hip replacement surgery on low back pain in severe osteoarthritis of the hip. Spine (Phila Pa). 1976;32:2099–102.
- Wang W, Sun M, Xu Z, Qiu Y, Weng W. The low back pain in patients with hip osteoarthritis: current knowledge on the diagnosis, mechanism and treatment outcome. Ann Jt 2016;1:9–9. [CrossRef]
- Vigdorchik JM, Shafi KA, Kolin DA, Buckland AJ, Carroll KM, Jerabek SA. Does low back pain improve following total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2022;37:S937–40. [CrossRef]
- Mak D, Chisholm C, Davies AM, Botchu R, James SL. Psoas muscle atrophy following unilateral hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 2020;49:1539–45. [CrossRef]
- Oichi T, Taniguchi Y, Oshima Y, Tanaka S, Saito T. Pathomechanism of intervertebral disc degeneration. JOR Spine 2020;3:e1076. [CrossRef]
- Hernán MA, Robins JM. Using big data to emulate a target trial when a randomized trial is not available. Am J Epidemiol 2016;183:758–64. [CrossRef]
- Eyvazov K, Eyvazov B, Basar S, Nasto LA, Kanatli U. Effects of total hip arthroplasty on spinal sagittal alignment and static balance: a prospective study on 28 patients. Eur Spine J 2016;25:3615–21. [CrossRef]
- Gouveia K, Shah A, Kay J, Memon M, Simunovic N, Cakic JN, et al. Iliopsoas tenotomy during hip arthroscopy: A systematic review of postoperative outcomes. Am J Sports Med 2021;49:817–29. [CrossRef]
- Genc AS, Agar A, Güzel N. Evaluation of psoas muscle atrophy and the degree of fat infiltration after unilateral hip arthroplasty. Cureus 2023;15:e41506. [CrossRef]
- Kutcher SA, Brophy JM, Banack HR, Kaufman JS, Samuel M. Emulating a randomised controlled trial with observational data: An introduction to the target trial framework. Can J Cardiol 2021;37:1365–77. [CrossRef]
- Matthews AA, Danaei G, Islam N, Kurth T. Target trial emulation: applying principles of randomised trials to observational studies. BMJ 2022;378:e071108. [CrossRef]
- Matthews AA, Young JC, Kurth T. The target trial framework in clinical epidemiology: principles and applications. J Clin Epidemiol 2023;164:112–5. [CrossRef]
- Rasch A, Byström AH, Dalen N, Berg HE. Reduced muscle radiological density, cross-sectional area, and strength of major hip and knee muscles in 22 patients with hip osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop 2007;78:505–10. [CrossRef]
- Rasch A, Byström AH, Dalén N, Martinez-Carranza N, Berg HE. Persisting muscle atrophy two years after replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:583–8. [CrossRef]
- Vasarhelyi EM, Williams HA, Howard JL, Petis S, Barfett J, Lanting BA. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical technique on postoperative muscle atrophy. Orthopedics 2020;43:361–6. [CrossRef]


| Inclusion Criteria | |
|---|---|
| - Age 18-72 years at the time of intervention - THA performed between 2010-2020 | |
| Absolute Exclusion Criteria | |
| - Previous lower limb or axial fracture - THA due to fractures. - Lower limb amputations. - Revision THA surgeries. - Inflammatory diseases. - Neurodegenerative diseases. - Mental illness. - Patients whose Electronic Medical Record only contains the surgical report. |
- Avascular necrosis of the femoral head. - Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease. - Hip dysplasias. - Congenital skeletal abnormalities. - Vertebral surgery prior to THA. - Scoliosis. - Scheuermann’s disease. - Neoplasms affecting the axial skeleton. - Bone or prosthetic infections. |
| Partial Exclusion Criteria | |
| - Bilateral total hip prosthesis. - Chronic alcoholism. - Cervical surgery. |
- Previous knee arthroscopy. - Posterior knee replacement. - Post-THA leg length discrepancy. |
| Other Exclusion Criteria | |
| - Insufficient data on covariates. - Presence of low back pain prior to a diagnosis of coxarthrosis. | |
| Characteristics | Pre-surgery (N = 180) |
Post-surgery (N = 228) |
SMD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.04 | ||
| Male | 115 (64%) | 141 (62%) | |
| Female | 65 (36%) | 87 (38%) | |
| Median age, in years (IQR) | 57 (52-63) | 61 (55-67) | 0.46 |
| BMI, in Kg/cm^2 (IQR) | 29 (26-32) | 29 (26-32) | 0.01 |
| Median Disease Progression, in months (IQR) | 0 (0-0) | 25 (3-66) | 1.35 |
| Follow-up Start Period | 1.18 | ||
| 2001-2005 | 14 (7.8%) | 0 (0%) | |
| 2006-2010 | 64 (36%) | 11 (4.8%) | |
| 2011-2015 | 81 (45%) | 112 (47%) | |
| 2016-2020 | 21 (12%) | 105 (46%) |
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | Risk Ratio after 5 years of follow-up (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Pre-ATC (reference) | Post-ATC | Pre-ATC (reference) | Post-ATC |
|
Unadjusted, n = 408 |
1 | 2.23 (1.5-3.2) |
||
|
Adjusted for age, sex, BMI and period n = 408 |
1 | 1.64 (1.0-2.6) |
||
|
Paired and adjusted for age n = 346 |
1 |
1.12 (0.4-3.1) | ||
|
Paired and adjusted for age n = 492* |
1 | 0.77 (0.3-1.8) | ||
|
Target trial emulation**, n = 7887 person-trials |
1 | 1.04 (0.7-1.8) | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).