Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

EpCAM Signaling in Oral Cancer Stem Cells: Implications for Metastasis, Tumorigenicity, and Therapeutic Strategies

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

14 January 2025

Posted:

15 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Oral cancer, a subtype of head and neck cancer, poses significant global health challenges owing to its late diagnosis and high metastatic potential. The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), a transmembrane glycoprotein, has emerged as a critical player in cancer biology, particularly in oral cancer stem cells (CSCs). This review highlights the multifaceted roles of EPCAM in regulating oral cancer metastasis, tumorigenicity, and resistance to therapy. EpCAM influences key pathways, including Wnt/β-catenin and EGFR, modulating CSC self-renewal, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and immune evasion. Moreover, EpCAM has been implicated in metabolic reprogramming, epigenetic regulation, and crosstalk with other signaling pathways. Advances in EpCAM-targeting strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T/NK cell therapies, and aptamer-based systems hold promise for personalized cancer therapies. However, challenges remain in understanding the precise mechanism of EpCAM in CSC biology and its translation into clinical applications. This review highlights the need for further investigation into the role of EPCAM in oral CSCs and its potential as a therapeutic target to improve patient outcomes.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Oral cancer is consistently ranked among the top ten cancers across the world, with large differences in its geographic distribution [1,2]. Oral cancer is a type of head and neck cancer characterized by cancerous tissue growth in the oral cavity, including the lips, tongue, cheeks, mouth floor, hard and soft palate, sinuses, and pharynx (throat). Oral cancer can be life-threatening if not diagnosed or treated early. This type of cancer can arise as a primary lesion originating from any tissue in the mouth, via metastasis from a distant site of origin, or extending from the nasal cavity. Oral cancers can originate in the mouth in various forms, such as teratoma, adenocarcinoma derived from a major or minor salivary gland, lymphoma from tonsillar or other lymphoid tissues, or melanoma from the pigment-producing cells of the oral mucosa. Studies have indicated that approximately 90% of oral cancers are oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) [3,4,5], originating in the mucosal epithelium that lines the mouth and lips; however, there are other types of oral cancer, such as oral Kaposi’s sarcoma [6]. In the early stages of oral cancer, it can go unnoticed and is painless, with subtle physical changes. Treatment is generally effective if oral cancer is diagnosed at an early stage. Late (advanced) stage (stage III/IV) symptoms include indurated areas, paresthesia or dysesthesia of the tongue or lips, airway obstruction, chronic serous otitis media, otalgia, trismus, dysphagia, cervical lymphadenopathy, persistent or referred pain, and altered vision. The 5-year disease-free survival rate for intraoral carcinoma is 76% if metastasis has not occurred, 41% when the cervical nodes are involved, and only 9% when metastasis below the clavicle is present [7]. Additionally, tumor metastasis and subsequent recurrence have a negative impact on the 5-year survival rate under current therapies [8]. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) possess self-renewal and differentiation capacities that cause heterogeneous lineages of cancer cells to form tumors [9] (Figure 1). Also, it has been reported that cancer stem cells (CSCs) play a crucial role in the recurrence, metastasis, and poor prognosis in OSCC [10,11,12,13] (Figure 1).

2. EpCAM as a CSC Marker: Signaling Pathways and Role in Oral CSCs

The epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), also known as CD326 and epithelial-specific antigen (ESA), was initially proposed to function as a cell–cell adhesion molecule [14] and is a type I transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in various epithelial tissues [15,16,17]. Clinical studies have shown that EpCAM is highly expressed in various cancers, including breast cancer, pancreatic cancer [18,19], various epithelial cancers, and OSCC, and its overexpression is associated with poor prognosis [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Al-Hajj et al. reported that the frequency of tumor-initiating cells was >10-fold higher in the EpCAM-positive fraction of breast CSCs than in the EpCAM-negative fraction [27]. EpCAM is also a CSC marker in various cancers, including colon cancer [28,29,30], lung [31], breast [27], pancreatic [32], hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [33], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) [34], and oral cancers [35]. Several studies have reported that EpCAM plays critical roles in cancer stemness [36], cell proliferation, metabolism, angiogenesis [37], epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [36,38,39], metastasis [36], chemoresistance [34,40,41], and immunomodulation [42,43]. However, the role of EPCAM in cancer metastasis remains unclear. The signaling of EpCAM crosstalk with other molecules is involved in the function of CSCs in tumor development (Figure 2). EpCAM can be processed by two membranous enzymes, ADAM17 and γ-secretase [44], and is prone to cleavage during intracellular proteolysis [44,45]. The extracellular domain of EpCAM can be cut by ADAM17, leading to the shedding of EpCAM’s ectodomain (EpEX). Subsequently, the intracellular domain of EpCAM’s cytoplasmic tail (EpICD) is cleaved by γ-secretase. The released EpICD can associate with transcription factor and other cofactors, including four and a half LIM domain protein 2 (FHL2), lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF1), and β-catenin [44]. The EpICD complex is translocated to the nucleus and regulates the transcription of CSC reprogramming genes, including OCT4, SOX2, c-MYC, and NANOG, which are key regulators of self-renewal [46,47] and maintenance of the oral CSCs’ population in the undifferentiated state [48,49,50]. We recently reported that increased EpEX release enhanced EpICD production. EpICD associates with β-catenin and cofactor FHL2 (four and a half LIM domain protein 2) to form a transcriptome complex that translocates into the nucleus to modulate the transcriptional activity of target genes, such as c-Myc and promote tumor progression [51]. Thus, precise EpCAM signaling may present an accurate relationship between EpCAM and cancer cells.

3. Crosstalk Between EpCAM and Other Signaling Pathways Regulating Oral CSC

In activated CSCs, several signaling pathways, including Wnt/β-catenin, as well as transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β), Hedgehog (Hh), Notch, Yes-associated protein (YAP), Nuclear Factor kappa B (NF-κB), JAK/STAT3, and EGF [52], regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and self-renewal. Some of these pathways have been reported to crosstalk with EpCAM during oral cancer progression. For example, In OSCC cells, soluble EpEX activates the EGFR-ERK signaling pathway and promotes the nuclear translocation of EpICDs, contributing to cetuximab resistance [53]. Additionally, EpCAM exerts its biological functions via Wnt/β-catenin signaling in CSCs. Yamashita et al. reported that EpCAM+ HCC cells exhibit high invasiveness and tumorigenicity by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling, highlighting the critical role of EpCAM in maintaining hepatic CSCs [33]. The EPCAM gene is more highly expressed in the CSC-like side population (SP) of SAS oral cancer cells than in non-SP cells. Treatment with Honokiol, an active compound from Magnolia officinalis, eliminates CSC-like SP cells in SAS oral cancer by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [54]. Additionally, in the CSC subpopulation of OSCC, CD44+ EpCAMhigh cells represent proliferative epithelial CSCs with resistance to chemotherapy in oral CSCs [35,55]. However, in oral CSCs, the pathways that crosstalk with the EpCAM signaling pathway, along with their roles in self-renewal, stemness, differentiation, and other characteristics, remain unclear and require further investigation.

4. Risks and Causes of Oral Cancer: Genetic Mutations, Epigenetic Changes, and Post-Translational Modifications of EpCAM

Risk factors that predispose individuals to oral cancer have been identified in epidemiological (epidemiology) studies, including tobacco use [56], chewing betel, paan, and Areca [57,58] and excessive alcohol consumption [59], viral infection, poor oral hygiene, irritation caused by ill-fitting dentures and other rough surfaces on the teeth, poor nutrition [60], chronic infections caused by fungi or bacteria [61,62], and infection with oncogenic viruses, such as Human Papillomavirus (HPV) [3,63]. Additionally, clinical observations indicate that the infection of oral epithelial stem cells by high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types is associated with early lymphatic metastasis in HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma [64,65]. In addition, oral cancer is driven by complex interactions between environmental factors, genetic mutations, and epigenetic alterations [66].
The human EPCAM gene (EPCAM), also known as TACSTD1 and located on chromosome 2P21, is comprised of nine exons [26]. Genetic mutations in EpCAM have been described to be responsible for congenital tufting enteropathy (CTE), intractable diarrhea in infants [67], and Lynch syndrome (also known as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer or HNPCC) [68,69]. EpCAM-related Lynch syndrome is caused by deletions at the 3′-end of the EPCAM (TACSTD1) gene, resulting in promoter hypermethylation of the MSH2 gene [69]. Oral cancers are typically associated with at least three types of genetic mutations: (1) point mutations in proto-oncogenes, (2) gene amplification, and (3) chromosomal translocation [70]. These mutations lead to the activation of oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), BCL, c-MYC, and int-2 [71,72,73].
While some aspects of cancer stem cells (CSCs) differ from those of embryonic stem cells (ESCs), they also share several common properties. ESC signatures have been reported to maintain self-renewal and drive cellular reprogramming into the pluripotent state in normal somatic cells, as well as in malignant transformed cells. The exogenous induction of ESC stemness genes promotes dysplastic growth in adult epithelial tissues [74,75]. These findings highlight a potential link between ESC/stemness signature-mediated reprogramming and tumor transformation. According to recent studies, metastasis is considered a key factor for poor prognosis [76,77,78,79,80,81]. Additionally, EpCAM plays a crucial role in maintaining ESCs by regulating key factors, such as c-MYC, OCT-4, NANOG, SOX2, and KLF4, which are influenced by epigenetic alterations [48]. Epigenetic alterations include DNA methylation and histone modifications, which regulate gene expression and genome function. Promoter hypomethylation of EpCAM leads to its overexpression in various tumors, such as lung cancer [82,83], endometrial cancer [84], breast cancer [85], and ovarian cancer [86]. In OSCC, EpCAM expression increases during cancer development and is linked to promoter methylation; however, it does not significantly correlate with the overexpression of DNA methyltransferase-1 in OSCC tumors [87].
EpCAM has three extracellular N-glycosylation sites [88,89,90], which are crucial for maintaining its stability, expression levels, and half-life in the plasma membrane [89]. In breast cancer, N-glycosylation mutations of EpCAM reduce N-linked glycosylation, affecting the EMT [39] and cellular apoptosis by regulating the expression of both anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 and the pro-apoptotic proteins Bax and Caspase 3 [91], as well as cell adhesion FAK/Akt/Gsk-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway [92]. However, EPCAM is hyperglycosylated in head and neck cancer tissues [93]. Furthermore, the maintenance of CSCs has been shown to be influenced by various factors, including DNA mutations, epigenetic alterations, and genomic changes, such as chromosomal amplifications, deletions, and rearrangements, as well as interactions within the tumor microenvironment [94]. However, the role of the genetic and epigenetic modifications of EPCAM in regulating the characteristics of oral CSCs remain poorly understood and require further investigation.

5. Role of CSCs and EpCAM Expression Within Tumor Microenvironment

CSCs residing in niches maintain self-renewal, enhance stemness, induce angiogenesis, and avoid immunosurveillance via crosstalk with immune and other stromal cells, as well as secreted factors in the tumor microenvironment [95]. These interactions are mediated through the release or encapsulation of cytokines (e.g., interleukins and TGF-b) [96,97], matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [98], and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [99], as well as RNA [100], DNA, lipid, and protein in extracellular vesicles (EVs), also known as exosomes. Exosomes secreted by OSCC CSCs drive M2 TAM polarization by transferring lncRNA UCA1, which targets the LAMC2-mediated PI3K/AKT signaling pathway while suppressing CD4+ T cell proliferation and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) production [101]. Additionally, exosomal EpCAM expression is elevated in prostate cancer patients compared to that in healthy controls [102] and has been identified as a biomarker in blood samples from pancreatic and breast cancer patients [103], where it also serves as a therapeutic target. Bi-specific antibodies targeting both EpCAM and CD73 can selectively target EpCAM+ carcinoma-derived EVs secreted from various cancer cells and inhibit CD73 EV-mediated immune suppression compared to CD73-targeting alone [104].

6. Role of EpCAM in CSC Metabolism

Cancer cells rely on less efficient processes and use less efficient glycolysis for the production of ATP and building essential blocks for biosynthesis (e.g., nucleotides, amino acids, and lipids) required for rapid cancer cell proliferation, providing cancer cells with a growth advantage called “The Warburg effect” [105]. As mentioned above, CSCs evolve through genetic and epigenetic alterations, as well as interactions with their niche, resulting in the emergence of diverse CSC subclones. CSCs exhibit metabolic plasticity, relying on either oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), which involves mitochondrial respiration to generate ATP, or glycolysis, similar to the “Warburg effect,” depending on the oncogenic background and microenvironmental conditions, such as hypoxia or nutrient availability, with mitochondria playing a critical role in maintaining stemness, migration, and therapy resistance [106,107]. Oral CSCs predominantly rely on glycolysis over the oxidative phosphorylation of OXPHOS, which is a metabolic trait observed in nasopharyngeal cancer [108,109]. Metabolic reprogramming in both basal-like breast cancer CSCs and glioma CSCs involves switching from OXPHOS to aerobic glycolysis, which is crucial for maintaining CSC function by reducing ROS levels [110,111]. Additionally, in brain tumor CSCs, glucose induces the expression of key metabolic genes, including c-MYC, GLUT1, HK-1, HK-2, and PDK-1, which regulate glucose metabolism and activate the Akt signaling pathway [111]. In a metabolomic study of CSCs in OSCC multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTSs), CSCs were found to depend primarily on glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation, exhibited decreased fatty acid oxidation, and showed lower metabolic activity than differentiated cancer cells, which may underlie their resistance to metabolic therapies targeting highly proliferative tumors [112]. However, the metabolic program and the underlying mechanisms of action of oral CSCs remain unclear.
Figure 3. Differences in glucose utilization between CSCs and non-stem tumor cells underscore their distinct metabolic profiles. The differences in glucose utilization between CSCs and non-stem tumor cells highlight their distinct metabolic profiles. In non-stem tumor cells, metabolic reprogramming favors aerobic glycolysis, where pyruvate is predominantly converted to lactate for ATP generation. Only a minor portion of pyruvate enters the TCA cycle to support biosynthetic processes, resulting in reduced mitochondrial respiration but enhanced cell proliferation. CSCs, however, display distinct metabolic characteristics, primarily utilizing OXPHOS or employing a hybrid metabolic state that combines both OXPHOS and high glycolytic activity. This metabolic profile is dynamically regulated by various factors including oncogenic signaling, oxygen levels, and nutrient availability.
Figure 3. Differences in glucose utilization between CSCs and non-stem tumor cells underscore their distinct metabolic profiles. The differences in glucose utilization between CSCs and non-stem tumor cells highlight their distinct metabolic profiles. In non-stem tumor cells, metabolic reprogramming favors aerobic glycolysis, where pyruvate is predominantly converted to lactate for ATP generation. Only a minor portion of pyruvate enters the TCA cycle to support biosynthetic processes, resulting in reduced mitochondrial respiration but enhanced cell proliferation. CSCs, however, display distinct metabolic characteristics, primarily utilizing OXPHOS or employing a hybrid metabolic state that combines both OXPHOS and high glycolytic activity. This metabolic profile is dynamically regulated by various factors including oncogenic signaling, oxygen levels, and nutrient availability.
Preprints 146166 g003

7. EpCAM as Biomarker for Oral Cancer Diagnosis and Targeting Therapy

EpCAM+ circulating tumor cells (CTCs) serve as biomarkers of disease progression and metastatic risk in OSCC [113]. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are the seeds of metastasis [81,114,115,116]. CTCs are shed by primary tumors into the bloodstream, travelling through the vasculature via the circulation, before being deposited at distant sites and maintaining cell proliferation, triggering a cascade that is responsible for oral cancer-related deaths [117]. Unfortunately, at present, the mechanism underlying the ability of CTCs to escape and survive shear stress and the immune response in the bloodstream, as well as the locations at which they ultimately deposit, remain poorly understood. The detection of CTCs has prognostic and therapeutic implications, especially for understanding metastatic potential, disease progression, and effectiveness of treatment, as well as for providing real-time information on the disease status of patients [118]. The detection of CTCs in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma could help predict recurrence with higher sensitivity than conventional staging [118]. Technological advances in the detection of CTCs and their bio-molecular characterization offer new perspectives for the identification of potential targets for tailor-made therapies. Hence, the early detection of tumor cell dissemination combined with an understanding of the underlying mechanisms are crucial for predicting prognosis, relapse, and survival. Furthermore, the current Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved CTC assay, the CellSearch™ System (Veridex LLC; CellSearch) [119,120,121], overlooks CSC phenotypes, crucial for tumor progression and therapy resistance, prompting the integration of CTC and CSC markers for improved prognostic accuracy [122].

8. EpCAM-Targeting Immunotherapies

Inhibitors targeting specific molecules involved in tumor progression or their downstream signaling pathways have been used to improve disease prognosis [123,124]. Various EpCAM-targeted antibodies that demonstrate promising anticancer activity against oral cancer cells and CSCs, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T or NK cells, have been developed.
Anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody (EpMab-16) demonstrates in vivo anti-OSCC activity via the induction of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) [125]. Low doses of the EpCAM/CD3-bispecific antibody MT110 (solitomab) effectively engage cytotoxic human T cells and demonstrate the potential to target highly tumorigenic pancreatic CSCs, both in vitro and in vivo [126]. Similarly, the bispecific antibody solitomab demonstrates anti-tumor activity against primary uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma cells [127]; however, it failed to surpass clinical trials due to gastrointestinal toxicity [128]. EpCAM-targeted antibodies exhibit anticancer activity against tumors or CSCs not only by directly targeting cancer cells but also by regulating the expression of immune checkpoint inhibitors. For example, EpCAM antibodies (EpAb2-6) effectively downregulate PD-L1 levels, enhance CD8+ T-cell cytotoxic activity, and boost the therapeutic efficacy of atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, in vivo [42].
IL-15, a cytokine that activates NK cells [129], promotes the expansion of CAR-NK cells in vivo and enhances their cytotoxicity against EpCAM+ breast CSCs [130]. In addition, EpCAM-specific CAR-NK-92 cells have been shown to exhibit a strong potential to kill CRC cells, with their effects being further enhanced in combination with regorafenib, a potent multikinase inhibitor.
EpCAM CAR-T cells have been developed that exhibit effective killing abilities against various tumors, such as AML [131], gastric [132], colon/lung/pancreatic [133], and prostate cancer [134]. EpCAM CAR-T cells effectively induce apoptosis in colon cancer cells and enhance the secretion of cytokines IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-6, which play antitumor roles in immunotherapy by modulating immune responses [135,136,137]. The action of EpCAM CAR-T cells against solid tumors, as well as their safety, was evaluated using an EpCAM-humanized mouse model, with clinical trials of autologous EpCAM CAR-T cell therapy for solid tumors demonstrating both safety and efficacy [138].
CSC-derived peptides, including EpCAM peptides used as antigen sources for dendritic cell (DC) vaccination, induce EpCAM peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) with potent cytotoxic activity against EpCAM-positive HCC cells [139]. Additionally, EpCAM, a common tumor-associated antigen (TAA) targeted in colon cancer, induces IL-4-dominated T helper (Th)2 responses during Th-cell priming, even under Th1-inducing conditions, promoting tumor growth and undermining the therapeutic efficacy of tumor vaccines aimed at inducing interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-producing CD4+ Th1 cells [140]. However, the efficacy of EpCAM CAR-T cells, NK cells, and vaccines against oral cancer or CSCs have yet to be characterized.
The RNA EpCAM-aptamer-based delivery system (Apt-DOX) targets colon CSCs, enhancing DOX retention in the nuclei, significantly improving CSC sensitivity to DOX, overcoming chemoresistance, and eliminating CSCs both in vitro and in vivo [141]. The novel synthesis of doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX·HCl) and siRNA-loaded polymer vesicles labeled with anti-EpCAM antibody demonstrated effective liver CSC killing and tumor growth inhibition with reduced toxicity to normal cells in vitro [142].

9. Summary

This review focuses on the critical role of the Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule (EpCAM) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), emphasizing its contributions to cancer stem cell (CSC) biology, tumor progression, and therapeutic resistance. EpCAM is a transmembrane glycoprotein that functions in cell adhesion and signaling. Its overexpression is associated with a poor prognosis and is a hallmark of CSCs in various cancers, including OSCC. EpCAM mediates tumorigenicity by promoting the EMT, metastasis, and therapy resistance through pathways including Wnt/β-catenin and EGFR-ERK, among others. Additionally, EpCAM signaling interacts with metabolic reprogramming to facilitate CSC adaptability and survival in adverse tumor microenvironments.
Taken together, this review explored the potential of EpCAM as a biomarker for early cancer detection, as well as a target for innovative therapies, including CAR-T cells, monoclonal antibodies, and EpCAM-labeled drug delivery systems. This discussion highlights the limitations of current therapeutic strategies and the need for the more precise targeting of EpCAM-mediated pathways.

10. Conclusion

EpCAM plays a pivotal role in the progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance of OSCC by regulating the CSC properties and tumor microenvironment interactions. Its dual functionality as a biomarker and therapeutic target makes it a promising candidate for advancing personalized cancer treatment. However, further research is needed to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying EpCAM signaling, as well as to overcome the challenges of targeting CSCs and improve the efficacy and safety of EpCAM-based therapies.

Author Contributions

C.-H.C., C.-C.T., F.-M.T., T.-Y.C., P.-C.H., C.-Y. K: Writing—original draft; C.-H.C., C.-C.T., P.-C.H., C.-Y. K: Writing—review and editing. All the authors have approved to the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan (grant number TCRD-TPE-111-06 (2/2)).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kamangar, F.; Dores, G.M.; Anderson, W.F. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006, 24, 2137–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chen, Y.J.; Lin, S.C.; Kao, T.; Chang, C.S.; Hong, P.S.; Shieh, T.M.; Chang, K.W. Genome-wide profiling of oral squamous cell carcinoma. The Journal of pathology 2004, 204, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chi, A.C.; Day, T.A.; Neville, B.W. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma--an update. CA Cancer J Clin 2015, 65, 401–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Malik, U.U.; Zarina, S.; Pennington, S.R. Oral squamous cell carcinoma: Key clinical questions, biomarker discovery, and the role of proteomics. Arch Oral Biol 2016, 63, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Petersen, P.E. Oral cancer prevention and control--the approach of the World Health Organization. Oral Oncol 2009, 45, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fatahzadeh, M.; Schwartz, R.A. Oral Kaposi’s sarcoma: a review and update. Int J Dermatol 2013, 52, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kademani, D.; Bell, R.B.; Bagheri, S.; Holmgren, E.; Dierks, E.; Potter, B.; Homer, L. Prognostic factors in intraoral squamous cell carcinoma: the influence of histologic grade. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2005, 63, 1599–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ling, Z.; Cheng, B.; Tao, X. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Challenges and opportunities. Int J Cancer 2021, 148, 1548–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Clevers, H. The cancer stem cell: premises, promises and challenges. Nature medicine 2011, 17, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reya, T.; Morrison, S.J.; Clarke, M.F.; Weissman, I.L. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 2001, 414, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Z.; Filho, M.S.; Nör, J.E. The biology of head and neck cancer stem cells. Oral Oncol 2012, 48, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dorna, D.; Paluszczak, J. Targeting cancer stem cells as a strategy for reducing chemotherapy resistance in head and neck cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023, 149, 13417–13435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oskarsson, T.; Batlle, E.; Massague, J. Metastatic stem cells: sources, niches, and vital pathways. Cell stem cell 2014, 14, 306–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Litvinov, S.V.; Velders, M.P.; Bakker, H.A.; Fleuren, G.J.; Warnaar, S.O. Ep-CAM: a human epithelial antigen is a homophilic cell-cell adhesion molecule. The Journal of cell biology 1994, 125, 437–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schnell, U.; Cirulli, V.; Giepmans, B.N. EpCAM: structure and function in health and disease. Biochimica et biophysica acta 2013, 1828, 1989–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Patriarca, C.; Macchi, R.M.; Marschner, A.K.; Mellstedt, H. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule expression (CD326) in cancer: a short review. Cancer treatment reviews 2012, 38, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. van der Gun, B.T.; Melchers, L.J.; Ruiters, M.H.; de Leij, L.F.; McLaughlin, P.M.; Rots, M.G. EpCAM in carcinogenesis: the good, the bad or the ugly. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 1913–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Scheunemann, P.; Stoecklein, N.H.; Rehders, A.; Bidde, M.; Metz, S.; Peiper, M.; Eisenberger, C.F.; Schulte Am Esch, J.; Knoefel, W.T.; Hosch, S.B. Occult tumor cells in lymph nodes as a predictor for tumor relapse in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008, 393, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Fong, D.; Steurer, M.; Obrist, P.; Barbieri, V.; Margreiter, R.; Amberger, A.; Laimer, K.; Gastl, G.; Tzankov, A.; Spizzo, G. Ep-CAM expression in pancreatic and ampullary carcinomas: frequency and prognostic relevance. J Clin Pathol 2008, 61, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sen, S.; Carnelio, S. Expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathology 2016, 68, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Tandon, A.K.; Clark, G.M.; Chamness, G.C.; McGuire, W.L. Association of the 323/A3 surface glycoprotein with tumor characteristics and behavior in human breast cancer. Cancer research 1990, 50, 3317–3321. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Gastl, G.; Spizzo, G.; Obrist, P.; Dunser, M.; Mikuz, G. Ep-CAM overexpression in breast cancer as a predictor of survival. Lancet 2000, 356, 1981–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Schmidt, M.; Hasenclever, D.; Schaeffer, M.; Boehm, D.; Cotarelo, C.; Steiner, E.; Lebrecht, A.; Siggelkow, W.; Weikel, W.; Schiffer-Petry, I.; et al. Prognostic effect of epithelial cell adhesion molecule overexpression in untreated node-negative breast cancer. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2008, 14, 5849–5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Spizzo, G.; Went, P.; Dirnhofer, S.; Obrist, P.; Simon, R.; Spichtin, H.; Maurer, R.; Metzger, U.; von Castelberg, B.; Bart, R.; et al. High Ep-CAM expression is associated with poor prognosis in node-positive breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment 2004, 86, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schmidt, M.; Petry, I.B.; Bohm, D.; Lebrecht, A.; von Torne, C.; Gebhard, S.; Gerhold-Ay, A.; Cotarelo, C.; Battista, M.; Schormann, W.; et al. Ep-CAM RNA expression predicts metastasis-free survival in three cohorts of untreated node-negative breast cancer. Breast cancer research and treatment 2011, 125, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baeuerle, P.A.; Gires, O. EpCAM (CD326) finding its role in cancer. Br J Cancer 2007, 96, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Al-Hajj, M.; Wicha, M.S.; Benito-Hernandez, A.; Morrison, S.J.; Clarke, M.F. Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100, 3983–3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Herlyn, M.; Steplewski, Z.; Herlyn, D.; Koprowski, H. Colorectal carcinoma-specific antigen: detection by means of monoclonal antibodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979, 76, 1438–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shmelkov, S.V.; Butler, J.M.; Hooper, A.T.; Hormigo, A.; Kushner, J.; Milde, T.; St Clair, R.; Baljevic, M.; White, I.; Jin, D.K.; et al. CD133 expression is not restricted to stem cells, and both CD133+ and CD133- metastatic colon cancer cells initiate tumors. J Clin Invest 2008, 118, 2111–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dalerba, P.; Dylla, S.J.; Park, I.K.; Liu, R.; Wang, X.; Cho, R.W.; Hoey, T.; Gurney, A.; Huang, E.H.; Simeone, D.M.; et al. Phenotypic characterization of human colorectal cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104, 10158–10163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Zheng, Y.; Wang, L.; Yin, L.; Yao, Z.; Tong, R.; Xue, J.; Lu, Y. Lung Cancer Stem Cell Markers as Therapeutic Targets: An Update on Signaling Pathways and Therapies. Front Oncol 2022, 12, 873994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, C.; Heidt, D.G.; Dalerba, P.; Burant, C.F.; Zhang, L.; Adsay, V.; Wicha, M.; Clarke, M.F.; Simeone, D.M. Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 2007, 67, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yamashita, T.; Ji, J.; Budhu, A.; Forgues, M.; Yang, W.; Wang, H.Y.; Jia, H.; Ye, Q.; Qin, L.X.; Wauthier, E.; et al. EpCAM-positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells are tumor-initiating cells with stem/progenitor cell features. Gastroenterology 2009, 136, 1012–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Noman, A.S.M.; Parag, R.R.; Rashid, M.I.; Islam, S.; Rahman, M.Z.; Chowdhury, A.A.; Sultana, A.; Jerin, C.; Siddiqua, A.; Rahman, L.; et al. Chemotherapeutic resistance of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is mediated by EpCAM induction driven by IL-6/p62 associated Nrf2-antioxidant pathway activation. Cell Death Dis 2020, 11, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Biddle, A.; Gammon, L.; Liang, X.; Costea, D.E.; Mackenzie, I.C. Phenotypic Plasticity Determines Cancer Stem Cell Therapeutic Resistance in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. EBioMedicine 2016, 4, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, M.H.; Sun, R.; Zhou, X.M.; Zhang, M.Y.; Lu, J.B.; Yang, Y.; Zeng, L.S.; Yang, X.Z.; Shi, L.; Xiao, R.W.; et al. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule overexpression regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition, stemness and metastasis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells via the PTEN/AKT/mTOR pathway. Cell Death Dis 2018, 9, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shan, Y.F.; Huang, Y.L.; Xie, Y.K.; Tan, Y.H.; Chen, B.C.; Zhou, M.T.; Shi, H.Q.; Yu, Z.P.; Song, Q.T.; Zhang, Q.Y. Angiogenesis and clinicopathologic characteristics in different hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes defined by EpCAM and α-fetoprotein expression status. Med Oncol 2011, 28, 1012–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, D.; Yang, L.; Liu, X.; Gao, J.; Liu, T.; Yan, Q.; Yang, X. Hypoxia modulates stem cell properties and induces EMT through N-glycosylation of EpCAM in breast cancer cells. J Cell Physiol 2020, 235, 3626–3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, D.; Liu, T.; Yan, Q.; Yang, X. Deglycosylation of epithelial cell adhesion molecule affects epithelial to mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells. J Cell Physiol 2019, 234, 4504–4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tayama, S.; Motohara, T.; Narantuya, D.; Li, C.; Fujimoto, K.; Sakaguchi, I.; Tashiro, H.; Saya, H.; Nagano, O.; Katabuchi, H. The impact of EpCAM expression on response to chemotherapy and clinical outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 44312–44325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ni, J.; Cozzi, P.; Hao, J.; Beretov, J.; Chang, L.; Duan, W.; Shigdar, S.; Delprado, W.; Graham, P.; Bucci, J.; et al. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) is associated with prostate cancer metastasis and chemo/radioresistance via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2013, 45, 2736–2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, H.N.; Liang, K.H.; Lai, J.K.; Lan, C.H.; Liao, M.Y.; Hung, S.H.; Chuang, Y.T.; Chen, K.C.; Tsuei, W.W.; Wu, H.C. EpCAM Signaling Promotes Tumor Progression and Protein Stability of PD-L1 through the EGFR Pathway. Cancer Res 2020, 80, 5035–5050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zheng, X.; Fan, X.; Fu, B.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, A.; Zhong, K.; Yan, J.; Sun, R.; Tian, Z.; Wei, H. EpCAM Inhibition Sensitizes Chemoresistant Leukemia to Immune Surveillance. Cancer Res 2017, 77, 482–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Maetzel, D.; Denzel, S.; Mack, B.; Canis, M.; Went, P.; Benk, M.; Kieu, C.; Papior, P.; Baeuerle, P.A.; Munz, M.; et al. Nuclear signalling by tumour-associated antigen EpCAM. Nature cell biology 2009, 11, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Imrich, S.; Hachmeister, M.; Gires, O. EpCAM and its potential role in tumor-initiating cells. Cell adhesion & migration 2012, 6, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lin, C.W.; Liao, M.Y.; Lin, W.W.; Wang, Y.P.; Lu, T.Y.; Wu, H.C. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule regulates tumor initiation and tumorigenesis via activating reprogramming factors and epithelial-mesenchymal transition gene expression in colon cancer. J Biol Chem 2012, 287, 39449–39459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Leng, Z.; Xia, Q.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Zhao, E.; Zheng, H.; Ai, W.; Dong, J. Lgr5+CD44+EpCAM+ Strictly Defines Cancer Stem Cells in Human Colorectal Cancer. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018, 46, 860–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lu, T.Y.; Lu, R.M.; Liao, M.Y.; Yu, J.; Chung, C.H.; Kao, C.F.; Wu, H.C. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule regulation is associated with the maintenance of the undifferentiated phenotype of human embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 2010, 285, 8719–8732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Major, A.G.; Pitty, L.P.; Farah, C.S. Cancer stem cell markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Stem Cells Int 2013, 2013, 319489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rodda, D.J.; Chew, J.L.; Lim, L.H.; Loh, Y.H.; Wang, B.; Ng, H.H.; Robson, P. Transcriptional regulation of nanog by OCT4 and SOX2. J Biol Chem 2005, 280, 24731–24737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Carpenter, G.; Red Brewer, M. EpCAM: another surface-to-nucleus missile. Cancer cell 2009, 15, 165–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Feng, Y.; Dai, X.; Li, X.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Du, Y.; Xia, L. EGF signalling pathway regulates colon cancer stem cell proliferation and apoptosis. Cell Prolif 2012, 45, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Umemori, K.; Ono, K.; Eguchi, T.; Kawai, H.; Nakamura, T.; Ogawa, T.; Yoshida, K.; Kanemoto, H.; Sato, K.; Obata, K.; et al. EpEX, the soluble extracellular domain of EpCAM, resists cetuximab treatment of EGFR-high head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2023, 142, 106433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yao, C.J.; Lai, G.M.; Yeh, C.T.; Lai, M.T.; Shih, P.H.; Chao, W.J.; Whang-Peng, J.; Chuang, S.E.; Lai, T.Y. Honokiol Eliminates Human Oral Cancer Stem-Like Cells Accompanied with Suppression of Wnt/ β -Catenin Signaling and Apoptosis Induction. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013, 2013, 146136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Biddle, A.; Liang, X.; Gammon, L.; Fazil, B.; Harper, L.J.; Emich, H.; Costea, D.E.; Mackenzie, I.C. Cancer stem cells in squamous cell carcinoma switch between two distinct phenotypes that are preferentially migratory or proliferative. Cancer Res 2011, 71, 5317–5326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Roy, S.; Girotra, S.; Radhakrishnan, A.; Basu, S. Prevalence and determinants of tobacco consumption and oral cancer screening among men in India: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional Survey. Journal of Public Health 2023, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, P.; Chua, N.Q.E.; Dang, S.; Davis, A.; Chong, K.W.; Prime, S.S.; Cirillo, N. Molecular Mechanisms of Malignant Transformation of Oral Submucous Fibrosis by Different Betel Quid Constituents-Does Fibroblast Senescence Play a Role? Int J Mol Sci 2022, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gunjal, S.; Pateel, D.G.S.; Yang, Y.H.; Doss, J.G.; Bilal, S.; Maling, T.H.; Mehrotra, R.; Cheong, S.C.; Zain, R.B.M. An Overview on Betel Quid and Areca Nut Practice and Control in Selected Asian and South East Asian Countries. Subst Use Misuse 2020, 55, 1533–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Prabhu, A.; Obi, K.O.; Rubenstein, J.H. The synergistic effects of alcohol and tobacco consumption on the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014, 109, 822–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rodríguez-Molinero, J.; Migueláñez-Medrán, B.D.C.; Puente-Gutiérrez, C.; Delgado-Somolinos, E.; Martín Carreras-Presas, C.; Fernández-Farhall, J.; López-Sánchez, A.F. Association between Oral Cancer and Diet: An Update. Nutrients 2021, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ko, Y.C.; Huang, Y.L.; Lee, C.H.; Chen, M.J.; Lin, L.M.; Tsai, C.C. Betel quid chewing, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption related to oral cancer in Taiwan. J Oral Pathol Med 1995, 24, 450–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ramachandran, S. Oral Cancer: Recent Breakthroughs in Pathology and Therapeutic Approaches. Oral Oncology Reports 2024, 100678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rhodus, N.L.; Kerr, A.R.; Patel, K. Oral cancer: leukoplakia, premalignancy, and squamous cell carcinoma. Dent Clin North Am 2014, 58, 315–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Desai, P.C.; Jaglal, M.V.; Gopal, P.; Ghim, S.J.; Miller, D.M.; Farghaly, H.; Jenson, A.B. Human papillomavirus in metastatic squamous carcinoma from unknown primaries in the head and neck: a retrospective 7 year study. Exp Mol Pathol 2009, 87, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Albers, A.E.; Chen, C.; Köberle, B.; Qian, X.; Klussmann, J.P.; Wollenberg, B.; Kaufmann, A.M. Stem cells in squamous head and neck cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2012, 81, 224–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gupta, I.; Badrzadeh, F.; Tsentalovich, Y.; Gaykalova, D.A. Connecting the dots: investigating the link between environmental, genetic, and epigenetic influences in metabolomic alterations in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2024, 43, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sivagnanam, M.; Mueller, J.L.; Lee, H.; Chen, Z.; Nelson, S.F.; Turner, D.; Zlotkin, S.H.; Pencharz, P.B.; Ngan, B.Y.; Libiger, O.; et al. Identification of EpCAM as the gene for congenital tufting enteropathy. Gastroenterology 2008, 135, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kovacs, M.E.; Papp, J.; Szentirmay, Z.; Otto, S.; Olah, E. Deletions removing the last exon of TACSTD1 constitute a distinct class of mutations predisposing to Lynch syndrome. Hum Mutat 2009, 30, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ligtenberg, M.J.; Kuiper, R.P.; Chan, T.L.; Goossens, M.; Hebeda, K.M.; Voorendt, M.; Lee, T.Y.; Bodmer, D.; Hoenselaar, E.; Hendriks-Cornelissen, S.J.; et al. Heritable somatic methylation and inactivation of MSH2 in families with Lynch syndrome due to deletion of the 3′ exons of TACSTD1. Nat Genet 2009, 41, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Krishna, A.; Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Pal, U.S. Molecular concept in human oral cancer. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2015, 6, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Berenson, J.R.; Yang, J.; Mickel, R.A. Frequent amplification of the bcl-1 locus in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oncogene 1989, 4, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Riviére, A.; Wilckens, C.; Löning, T. Expression of c-erbB2 and c-myc in squamous epithelia and squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck and the lower female genital tract. J Oral Pathol Med 1990, 19, 408–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Somers, K.D.; Cartwright, S.L.; Schechter, G.L. Amplification of the int-2 gene in human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Oncogene 1990, 5, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Hochedlinger, K.; Yamada, Y.; Beard, C.; Jaenisch, R. Ectopic expression of Oct-4 blocks progenitor-cell differentiation and causes dysplasia in epithelial tissues. Cell 2005, 121, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nichols, J.; Zevnik, B.; Anastassiadis, K.; Niwa, H.; Klewe-Nebenius, D.; Chambers, I.; Scholer, H.; Smith, A. Formation of pluripotent stem cells in the mammalian embryo depends on the POU transcription factor Oct4. Cell 1998, 95, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bernardi, M.A.; Logullo, A.F.; Pasini, F.S.; Nonogaki, S.; Blumke, C.; Soares, F.A.; Brentani, M.M. Prognostic significance of CD24 and claudin-7 immunoexpression in ductal invasive breast cancer. Oncology reports 2012, 27, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chao, Y.C.; Pan, S.H.; Yang, S.C.; Yu, S.L.; Che, T.F.; Lin, C.W.; Tsai, M.S.; Chang, G.C.; Wu, C.H.; Wu, Y.Y.; et al. Claudin-1 is a metastasis suppressor and correlates with clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2009, 179, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. DeVita, V.T., Jr.; Young, R.C.; Canellos, G.P. Combination versus single agent chemotherapy: a review of the basis for selection of drug treatment of cancer. Cancer 1975, 35, 98–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Folkman, J.; Shing, Y. Angiogenesis. The Journal of biological chemistry 1992, 267, 10931–10934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ono, M.; Torisu, H.; Fukushi, J.; Nishie, A.; Kuwano, M. Biological implications of macrophage infiltration in human tumor angiogenesis. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 1999, 43 Suppl, S69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wittekind, C.; Neid, M. Cancer invasion and metastasis. Oncology 2005, 69 Suppl 1, 14–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Cui, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Gu, L.; Lyu, M.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, T.; et al. Dynamic Expression of EpCAM in Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer Is Controlled by Both Genetic and Epigenetic Mechanisms. Cancers (Basel) 2022, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Tai, K.Y.; Shiah, S.G.; Shieh, Y.S.; Kao, Y.R.; Chi, C.Y.; Huang, E.; Lee, H.S.; Chang, L.C.; Yang, P.C.; Wu, C.W. DNA methylation and histone modification regulate silencing of epithelial cell adhesion molecule for tumor invasion and progression. Oncogene 2007, 26, 3989–3997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hsu, Y.T.; Gu, F.; Huang, Y.W.; Liu, J.; Ruan, J.; Huang, R.L.; Wang, C.M.; Chen, C.L.; Jadhav, R.R.; Lai, H.C.; et al. Promoter hypomethylation of EpCAM-regulated bone morphogenetic protein gene family in recurrent endometrial cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2013, 19, 6272–6285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Spizzo, G.; Gastl, G.; Obrist, P.; Fong, D.; Haun, M.; Grünewald, K.; Parson, W.; Eichmann, C.; Millinger, S.; Fiegl, H.; et al. Methylation status of the Ep-CAM promoter region in human breast cancer cell lines and breast cancer tissue. Cancer Lett 2007, 246, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. van der Gun, B.T.F.; Wasserkort, R.; Monami, A.; Jeltsch, A.; Raskó, T.; Ślaska-Kiss, K.; Cortese, R.; Rots, M.G.; de Leij, L.; Ruiters, M.H.J.; et al. Persistent downregulation of the pancarcinoma-associated epithelial cell adhesion molecule via active intranuclear methylation. Int J Cancer 2008, 123, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shiah, S.G.; Chang, L.C.; Tai, K.Y.; Lee, G.H.; Wu, C.W.; Shieh, Y.S. The involvement of promoter methylation and DNA methyltransferase-1 in the regulation of EpCAM expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2009, 45, e1–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Schön, M.P.; Schön, M.; Mattes, M.J.; Stein, R.; Weber, L.; Alberti, S.; Klein, C.E. Biochemical and immunological characterization of the human carcinoma-associated antigen MH 99/KS 1/4. Int J Cancer 1993, 55, 988–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Munz, M.; Fellinger, K.; Hofmann, T.; Schmitt, B.; Gires, O. Glycosylation is crucial for stability of tumour and cancer stem cell antigen EpCAM. Front Biosci 2008, 13, 5195–5201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Thampoe, I.J.; Ng, J.S.; Lloyd, K.O. Biochemical analysis of a human epithelial surface antigen: differential cell expression and processing. Arch Biochem Biophys 1988, 267, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Gao, J.; Sun, Y.; Liu, T.; Yan, Q.; Yang, X. The role of epithelial cell adhesion molecule N-glycosylation on apoptosis in breast cancer cells. Tumour Biol 2017, 39, 1010428317695973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Liu, X.; Gao, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, D.; Liu, T.; Yan, Q.; Yang, X. Mutation of N-linked glycosylation in EpCAM affected cell adhesion in breast cancer cells. Biol Chem 2017, 398, 1119–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Pauli, C.; Münz, M.; Kieu, C.; Mack, B.; Breinl, P.; Wollenberg, B.; Lang, S.; Zeidler, R.; Gires, O. Tumor-specific glycosylation of the carcinoma-associated epithelial cell adhesion molecule EpCAM in head and neck carcinomas. Cancer Lett 2003, 193, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Tomasetti, C.; Vogelstein, B. Cancer etiology. Variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions. Science 2015, 347, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Plaks, V.; Kong, N.; Werb, Z. The cancer stem cell niche: how essential is the niche in regulating stemness of tumor cells? Cell Stem Cell 2015, 16, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Webber, J.; Steadman, R.; Mason, M.D.; Tabi, Z.; Clayton, A. Cancer exosomes trigger fibroblast to myofibroblast differentiation. Cancer Res 2010, 70, 9621–9630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Gu, J.; Qian, H.; Shen, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, W.; Huang, L.; Yan, Y.; Mao, F.; Zhao, C.; Shi, Y.; et al. Gastric cancer exosomes trigger differentiation of umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells to carcinoma-associated fibroblasts through TGF-β/Smad pathway. PLoS One 2012, 7, e52465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ekström, E.J.; Bergenfelz, C.; von Bülow, V.; Serifler, F.; Carlemalm, E.; Jönsson, G.; Andersson, T.; Leandersson, K. WNT5A induces release of exosomes containing pro-angiogenic and immunosuppressive factors from malignant melanoma cells. Mol Cancer 2014, 13, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Taraboletti, G.; D’Ascenzo, S.; Giusti, I.; Marchetti, D.; Borsotti, P.; Millimaggi, D.; Giavazzi, R.; Pavan, A.; Dolo, V. Bioavailability of VEGF in tumor-shed vesicles depends on vesicle burst induced by acidic pH. Neoplasia 2006, 8, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. O’Brien, K.; Breyne, K.; Ughetto, S.; Laurent, L.C.; Breakefield, X.O. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2020, 21, 585–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wu, L.; Ye, S.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Liu, W. Oral Cancer Stem Cell-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles Promote M2 Macrophage Polarization and Suppress CD4(+) T-Cell Activity by Transferring UCA1 and Targeting LAMC2. Stem Cells Int 2022, 2022, 5817684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhou, Y.G.; Mohamadi, R.M.; Poudineh, M.; Kermanshah, L.; Ahmed, S.; Safaei, T.S.; Stojcic, J.; Nam, R.K.; Sargent, E.H.; Kelley, S.O. Interrogating Circulating Microsomes and Exosomes Using Metal Nanoparticles. Small 2016, 12, 727–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Chen, C.; Zong, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, B.; Cui, Y. Profiling of Exosomal Biomarkers for Accurate Cancer Identification: Combining DNA-PAINT with Machine- Learning-Based Classification. Small 2019, 15, e1901014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Ploeg, E.M.; Ke, X.; Britsch, I.; Hendriks, M.; Van der Zant, F.A.; Kruijff, S.; Samplonius, D.F.; Zhang, H.; Helfrich, W. Bispecific antibody CD73xEpCAM selectively inhibits the adenosine-mediated immunosuppressive activity of carcinoma-derived extracellular vesicles. Cancer Lett 2021, 521, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Vander Heiden, M.G.; Cantley, L.C.; Thompson, C.B. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009, 324, 1029–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sancho, P.; Barneda, D.; Heeschen, C. Hallmarks of cancer stem cell metabolism. Br J Cancer 2016, 114, 1305–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Deshmukh, A.; Deshpande, K.; Arfuso, F.; Newsholme, P.; Dharmarajan, A. Cancer stem cell metabolism: a potential target for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer 2016, 15, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Shen, Y.A.; Lin, C.H.; Chi, W.H.; Wang, C.Y.; Hsieh, Y.T.; Wei, Y.H.; Chen, Y.J. Resveratrol Impedes the Stemness, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, and Metabolic Reprogramming of Cancer Stem Cells in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma through p53 Activation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013, 2013, 590393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Shen, Y.A.; Wang, C.Y.; Hsieh, Y.T.; Chen, Y.J.; Wei, Y.H. Metabolic reprogramming orchestrates cancer stem cell properties in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cell Cycle 2015, 14, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Dong, C.; Yuan, T.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Fan, T.W.; Miriyala, S.; Lin, Y.; Yao, J.; Shi, J.; Kang, T.; et al. Loss of FBP1 by Snail-mediated repression provides metabolic advantages in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Cell 2013, 23, 316–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Liu, P.P.; Liao, J.; Tang, Z.J.; Wu, W.J.; Yang, J.; Zeng, Z.L.; Hu, Y.; Wang, P.; Ju, H.Q.; Xu, R.H.; et al. Metabolic regulation of cancer cell side population by glucose through activation of the Akt pathway. Cell Death Differ 2014, 21, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Miao, Y.; Wang, P.; Huang, J.; Qi, X.; Liang, Y.; Zhao, W.; Wang, H.; Lyu, J.; Zhu, H. Metabolomics, Transcriptome and Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis of the Metabolic Heterogeneity between Oral Cancer Stem Cells and Differentiated Cancer Cells. Cancers (Basel) 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Sahana, N.S.; Yadava, S.T.; Choudhary, B.; Ravindran, F.; Khatoon, H.; Kulkarni, M. Expression of circulating tumour cells in oral squamous cell carcinoma: An ex vivo pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2023, 27, 489–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Paget, S. The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast. 1889. Cancer metastasis reviews 1989, 8, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Fidler, I.J.; Poste, G. The “seed and soil” hypothesis revisited. The Lancet. Oncology 2008, 9, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Fidler, I.J. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the ’seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nature reviews. Cancer 2003, 3, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Mostert, B.; Sleijfer, S.; Foekens, J.A.; Gratama, J.W. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs): detection methods and their clinical relevance in breast cancer. Cancer treatment reviews 2009, 35, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Grobe, A.; Blessmann, M.; Hanken, H.; Friedrich, R.E.; Schon, G.; Wikner, J.; Effenberger, K.E.; Kluwe, L.; Heiland, M.; Pantel, K.; et al. Prognostic relevance of circulating tumor cells in blood and disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2014, 20, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Gorges, T.M.; Tinhofer, I.; Drosch, M.; Röse, L.; Zollner, T.M.; Krahn, T.; von Ahsen, O. Circulating tumour cells escape from EpCAM-based detection due to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. BMC Cancer 2012, 12, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nagrath, S.; Sequist, L.V.; Maheswaran, S.; Bell, D.W.; Irimia, D.; Ulkus, L.; Smith, M.R.; Kwak, E.L.; Digumarthy, S.; Muzikansky, A.; et al. Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature 2007, 450, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ankeny, J.S.; Court, C.M.; Hou, S.; Li, Q.; Song, M.; Wu, D.; Chen, J.F.; Lee, T.; Lin, M.; Sho, S.; et al. Circulating tumour cells as a biomarker for diagnosis and staging in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 2016, 114, 1367–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Sun, J.; Marx, A.; Alexander, A.; Wiley, J.; Kai, M.; Valero, V.; Lim, B. A combination of circulating tumor cell (CTC) and cancer stem cell (CSC) markers to predict the prognosis of breast cancer. 2023.
  123. Wicha, M.S. Targeting self-renewal, an Achilles’ heel of cancer stem cells. Nat Med 2014, 20, 14–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zhou, B.B.; Zhang, H.; Damelin, M.; Geles, K.G.; Grindley, J.C.; Dirks, P.B. Tumour-initiating cells: challenges and opportunities for anticancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2009, 8, 806–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kaneko, M.K.; Ohishi, T.; Takei, J.; Sano, M.; Nakamura, T.; Hosono, H.; Yanaka, M.; Asano, T.; Sayama, Y.; Harada, H.; et al. Anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody exerts antitumor activity against oral squamous cell carcinomas. Oncol Rep 2020, 44, 2517–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Cioffi, M.; Dorado, J.; Baeuerle, P.A.; Heeschen, C. EpCAM/CD3-Bispecific T-cell engaging antibody MT110 eliminates primary human pancreatic cancer stem cells. Clin Cancer Res 2012, 18, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Ferrari, F.; Bellone, S.; Black, J.; Schwab, C.L.; Lopez, S.; Cocco, E.; Bonazzoli, E.; Predolini, F.; Menderes, G.; Litkouhi, B.; et al. Solitomab, an EpCAM/CD3 bispecific antibody construct (BiTE®), is highly active against primary uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma cell lines in vitro. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2015, 34, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Fiedler, W.M.; Wolf, M.; Kebenko, M.; Goebeler, M.-E.; Ritter, B.; Quaas, A.; Vieser, E.; Hijazi, Y.; Patzak, I.; Friedrich, M. A phase I study of EpCAM/CD3-bispecific antibody (MT110) in patients with advanced solid tumors. 2012.
  129. Carson, W.E.; Giri, J.G.; Lindemann, M.J.; Linett, M.L.; Ahdieh, M.; Paxton, R.; Anderson, D.; Eisenmann, J.; Grabstein, K.; Caligiuri, M.A. Interleukin (IL) 15 is a novel cytokine that activates human natural killer cells via components of the IL-2 receptor. J Exp Med 1994, 180, 1395–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Sahm, C.; Schönfeld, K.; Wels, W.S. Expression of IL-15 in NK cells results in rapid enrichment and selective cytotoxicity of gene-modified effectors that carry a tumor-specific antigen receptor. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2012, 61, 1451–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nian, Z.; Zheng, X.; Dou, Y.; Du, X.; Zhou, L.; Fu, B.; Sun, R.; Tian, Z.; Wei, H. Rapamycin Pretreatment Rescues the Bone Marrow AML Cell Elimination Capacity of CAR-T Cells. Clin Cancer Res 2021, 27, 6026–6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Yang, Y.; McCloskey, J.E.; Yang, H.; Puc, J.; Alcaina, Y.; Vedvyas, Y.; Gomez Gallegos, A.A.; Ortiz-Sánchez, E.; de Stanchina, E.; Min, I.M.; et al. Bispecific CAR T Cells against EpCAM and Inducible ICAM-1 Overcome Antigen Heterogeneity and Generate Superior Antitumor Responses. Cancer Immunol Res 2021, 9, 1158–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Li, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Z.; Shi, Y.; Tian, E.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, T.; Dou, W.; Meng, X.; Chen, M.; et al. Targeting Wnt Signaling in the Tumor Immune Microenvironment to Enhancing EpCAM CAR T-Cell therapy. Front Pharmacol 2021, 12, 724306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Deng, Z.; Wu, Y.; Ma, W.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.Q. Adoptive T-cell therapy of prostate cancer targeting the cancer stem cell antigen EpCAM. BMC Immunol 2015, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Davila, M.L.; Riviere, I.; Wang, X.; Bartido, S.; Park, J.; Curran, K.; Chung, S.S.; Stefanski, J.; Borquez-Ojeda, O.; Olszewska, M.; et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19-28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med 2014, 6, 224ra225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Till, B.G.; Jensen, M.C.; Wang, J.; Qian, X.; Gopal, A.K.; Maloney, D.G.; Lindgren, C.G.; Lin, Y.; Pagel, J.M.; Budde, L.E.; et al. CD20-specific adoptive immunotherapy for lymphoma using a chimeric antigen receptor with both CD28 and 4-1BB domains: pilot clinical trial results. Blood 2012, 119, 3940–3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Zhou, Y.; Wen, P.; Li, M.; Li, Y.; Li, X.A. Construction of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells targeting EpCAM and assessment of their anti-tumor effect on cancer cells. Mol Med Rep 2019, 20, 2355–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Li, D.; Guo, X.; Yang, K.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Huang, Y.; Liang, X.; Su, J.; Jiang, L.; Li, J.; et al. EpCAM-targeting CAR-T cell immunotherapy is safe and efficacious for epithelial tumors. Sci Adv 2023, 9, eadg9721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Choi, Y.J.; Park, S.J.; Park, Y.S.; Park, H.S.; Yang, K.M.; Heo, K. EpCAM peptide-primed dendritic cell vaccination confers significant anti-tumor immunity in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. PLoS One 2018, 13, e0190638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ziegler, A.; Heidenreich, R.; Braumüller, H.; Wolburg, H.; Weidemann, S.; Mocikat, R.; Röcken, M. EpCAM, a human tumor-associated antigen promotes Th2 development and tumor immune evasion. Blood 2009, 113, 3494–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Xiang, D.; Shigdar, S.; Bean, A.G.; Bruce, M.; Yang, W.; Mathesh, M.; Wang, T.; Yin, W.; Tran, P.H.; Al Shamaileh, H.; et al. Transforming doxorubicin into a cancer stem cell killer via EpCAM aptamer-mediated delivery. Theranostics 2017, 7, 4071–4086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Chen, J.; Liu, Q.; Xiao, J.; Du, J. EpCAM-Antibody-Labeled Noncytotoxic Polymer Vesicles for Cancer Stem Cells-Targeted Delivery of Anticancer Drug and siRNA. Biomacromolecules 2015, 16, 1695–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagram of cancer stem cells. Adult SCs can accumulate genetic alterations, such as gene mutations, which may result in their transformation into malignant cells, also known as CSCs. These CSCs are capable of self-renewing to maintain their population and differentiating into non-stem cancer cells, driving cancer development and metastasis.
Figure 1. Diagram of cancer stem cells. Adult SCs can accumulate genetic alterations, such as gene mutations, which may result in their transformation into malignant cells, also known as CSCs. These CSCs are capable of self-renewing to maintain their population and differentiating into non-stem cancer cells, driving cancer development and metastasis.
Preprints 146166 g001
Figure 2. Role of the EpCAM signaling pathway in cancer progression. EpCAM undergoes sequential proteolytic processing on CSC membranes. ADAM17 and γ-secretase mediate this cleavage, releasing the extracellular domain (EpEX) and intracellular domain (EpICD). While the proteasome degrades most EpICD, a portion translocates to the nucleus where it forms a transcriptional complex with FHL2, LEF1, and β-catenin. The EpEX contains an EGF-like region that interacts with EGFR, triggering EGFR-ERK pathway activation. Concurrent activation of Wnt-β-catenin signaling leads to cytoplasmic β-catenin accumulation. FHL2 facilitates the nuclear translocation of both EpICD and β-catenin, where they form a transcriptional complex that regulates EpCAM target genes. Through these molecular mechanisms, EpCAM emerges as a central regulator of CSC in tumor progression such as proliferation, metastatic potential, and chemoresistance.
Figure 2. Role of the EpCAM signaling pathway in cancer progression. EpCAM undergoes sequential proteolytic processing on CSC membranes. ADAM17 and γ-secretase mediate this cleavage, releasing the extracellular domain (EpEX) and intracellular domain (EpICD). While the proteasome degrades most EpICD, a portion translocates to the nucleus where it forms a transcriptional complex with FHL2, LEF1, and β-catenin. The EpEX contains an EGF-like region that interacts with EGFR, triggering EGFR-ERK pathway activation. Concurrent activation of Wnt-β-catenin signaling leads to cytoplasmic β-catenin accumulation. FHL2 facilitates the nuclear translocation of both EpICD and β-catenin, where they form a transcriptional complex that regulates EpCAM target genes. Through these molecular mechanisms, EpCAM emerges as a central regulator of CSC in tumor progression such as proliferation, metastatic potential, and chemoresistance.
Preprints 146166 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated