Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Peritoneal Endometriosis Impairs Ovarian Reserve and Increases Atresia in a Rat Model

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

08 January 2025

Posted:

11 January 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Endometriosis has a marked impact on fertility, although the mechanisms behind this relationship remain poorly understood, particularly in cases without significant anatomical distortions or in the context of ovarian endometriomas. This study aimed to investigate the effect of peritoneal endometriosis on ovarian function by assessing ovarian reserve and apoptosis. Methods: Peritoneal endometriosis was surgically induced in Sprague Dawley rats through autotransplantation of uterine fragments onto the bowel mesothelium. One month post-surgery, ovarian structures were counted, follicle and corpora lutea apoptosis were evaluated by TUNEL and apoptotic-related protein expression in ovaries was assessed by western blot. Additionally, a co-culture system using 12Z endometriotic and KGN granulosa cell lines was utilized to evaluate gene expression by RT-qPCR. Results: Rats with peritoneal endometriosis exhibited a significant reduction in ovarian structures characterized by a low number of total follicles, particularly primordial, primary, preantral, and late antral follicles. Consistently, AMH protein expression was decreased in ovaries in the presence of endometriosis. Besides, this disease led to a significant increase in late antral follicles that were TUNEL-positive and in the number of apoptotic cells in corpora lutea, indicating higher apoptosis in endometriosis ovaries. Concomitantly, altered expression of apoptosis-related proteins was observed, with increased procaspase 3 and decreased BCL-2 expression. In addition, KGN granulosa cells co-cultured with 12Z endometriotic cells displayed reduced KITLG mRNA expression and increased AMHR2 mRNA expression. Conclusions: Peritoneal endometriosis significantly impairs ovarian health by disrupting folliculogenesis, reducing ovarian reserve, and increasing apoptosis, potentially accelerating ovarian aging and contributing to infertility. These results underscore the need for further research to identify the molecular pathways involved and to develop targeted therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: 
;  ;  

1. Introduction

Endometriosis is a complex disease characterized by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity, affecting approximately 10-15% of women of reproductive age [1]. The delayed diagnosis frequently occurs when the disease has reached an advanced stage, showing as chronic pelvic pain and/or infertility [2].
This condition has a particularly pronounced impact on fertility, as the prevalence of endometriosis is significantly higher among infertile women (around 30–40%) compared to the fertile population (10–15%). Surgical interventions, particularly minimally invasive laparoscopic excisions, have shown promise in alleviating pain and improving the chances of spontaneous pregnancy, with success rates reaching as high as 73% in severe cases [1,3]
The underlying mechanisms of endometriosis-related infertility are multifaceted, and shaped by a range of pathophysiological processes. Severe pelvic disease can create anatomical barriers to fertility; however, the mechanisms behind infertility in women lacking significant pelvic anatomical distortions, adhesions, or mechanical obstruction of the fallopian tubes remain poorly understood. Alternative processes need to be considered: minor adhesions, chronic intraperitoneal inflammation, disturbed folliculogenesis, luteal phase abnormalities, potential progesterone resistance, and disrupted ovarian reserve/function are some of the possible causes of infertility linked to the disease in these patients [4].
Ovarian reserve is the number and quality of the remaining primordial follicles in the ovary at any given time [5]. In clinical terms, it refers to the pool of follicles that can be stimulated, providing information about the growing population of follicles or the ovulatory potential [6]. That’s why the term is often interchangeable with other indices of ovarian function, such as antral follicle count or serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels [5]. AMH, produced by granulosa cells of preantral and early antral follicles, serves as a reliable indicator of follicle quantity and ovarian function [7].
The effect of ovarian endometriomas and their surgical removal on ovarian reserve remains a topic of ongoing debate. While many works establish a direct effect of endometrioma over the ovary, others assert that it is the removal surgery that compromises ovarian reserve [8]. Recent research indicates that endometriomas can impair ovarian function [9], and their excision leads to a decrease in AMH levels [8,10]. Moreover, infertile women with ovarian endometriomas had lower AMH concentrations and greater prolactin levels [11]. In contrast, other background evidence suggests that endometriomas do not significantly affect ovulatory function, indicating that the relationship between endometriosis and ovarian reserve may be complex and diverse [9,12].
Despite extensive research on the relationship between endometriomas and ovarian reserve, the impact of peritoneal endometriosis on ovarian physiology remains poorly understood. To address this gap, the objective of the present work was to study the effect of peritoneal endometriosis on ovarian function by assessing ovarian reserve and apoptosis.
Our findings suggest that peritoneal endometriosis disrupts normal ovarian function by impairing folliculogenesis, reducing the primordial ovarian reserve, diminishing AMH expression, and increasing ovarian apoptosis and follicular atresia, potentially affecting fertility. Understanding the association between peritoneal endometriosis and ovarian health is crucial for improving the management of infertility associated with this prevalent form of endometriosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Model

Adult (2-month-old) female Sprague Dawley rats were used in this study. Endometriosis-like lesions were induced through transplantation of three pieces of one of the uterine horns to the bowel mesothelium using a surgical procedure adapted for rats, based on the original method described by Mc Cormack et al. [13]. Briefly, animals were deeply anesthetized with an i.p. injection of ketamine (80 mg/kg; Holliday Scott, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and xylazine (10 mg/kg; Richmond, Buenos Aires, Argentina). Rats underwent laparotomy by mid-ventral incision to expose the uterus and intestine. The distal third part of the right uterine horn was removed, opened longitudinally, and cut into square pieces measuring ~16 mm2. Three equal pieces of tissue were then sutured onto the serosal layer with a single 6-0 nylon suture (Supralon, Ethicon, NJ, USA) with endometrial tissue facing the serosa. Sham animals underwent the same surgical procedure, but sutures were performed onto the bowels without uterine tissue. Six rats in the Sham group and eight in the endometriosis one were used.
Twenty-eight days after surgery, animals were daily cycled for 2 cycles (eight days) and afterward euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation in the proestrus morning. One ovary was then frozen and the other was fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde for subsequent assays. In addition, in rats with surgically induced endometriosis, lesions were identified, counted, and measured in two perpendicular diameters using a caliper. The volume of each lesion was calculated by the following formula: V=(4/3)Πr2R (where r and R are the radiuses and r < R). Lesions were then dissected away from intestinal tissue, peritoneum, and adhesions and fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde for two days for histological analysis. Formalin-fixed specimens of ectopic tissue were paraffin-embedded, cut into 5 µm sections, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Sections were examined microscopically for the presence of histological hallmarks of endometriosis.

2.2. Ovarian Morphology

The ovaries were removed and immediately fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde for 12 h and then embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer step sections were mounted at 50-μm intervals onto microscope slides to prevent counting the same structure twice, according to the method described by Woodruff et al. [14]. One set of slides was stained with hematoxylin-eosin to count the number of different structures per ovary section, and the others were used for apoptosis assays. Follicles were classified based on their developmental stages as follows: primordial follicles, identified by a single layer of squamous granulosa cells; primary follicles, characterized by a single layer of cuboidal granulosa cells; preantral follicles and antral follicles, distinguished by the presence or absence of an antral cavity; preovulatory follicles; and corpora lutea. Morphological characteristics of the atretic follicle include the degeneration and detachment of the granulosa cell layer from the basement membrane, the presence of pyknotic nuclei in this cell type, and oocyte degeneration [15]. The percentage of different structures was determined in 5 ovarian sections from each ovary.

2.3. Apoptosis Detection System

For apoptosis quantification, ovarian tissue sections were processed for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP-fluorescein nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining using the “In Situ Cell Death POD” kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Sections were treated according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, sections were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through graded alcohols, and permeabilized with 20 µg/ml Proteinase K (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). Endogenous peroxidase was inactivated by coating the samples with 3% H2O2. Sections were rinsed with PBS and then immersed for 60 min in TdT buffer at 37ºC. Sections were incubated for 30 min with the anti-fluorescein peroxidase antibody, followed by the peroxidase substrate DAB. Finally, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. As a negative control, some tissue samples were subjected to treatment without TdT. TUNEL-positive cells were counted using a standard light microscope by two independent observers at 400X magnification. A follicle or corpus luteum was considered TUNEL-positive when at least one apoptotic cell was present in the structure. The percentage of TUNEL-positive follicles or corpora lutea was determined for each rat by counting the total number of follicles and corpora lutea observed in a single ovarian section. Additionally, the number of TUNEL-positive cells was quantified per follicle and per corpus luteum. For corpora lutea, the percentage of TUNEL-positive cells was normalized to a constant corpus luteum area, which was calculated using the FIJI/ImageJ software (NIH, USA).

2.4. Western Blot

Ovaries were immediately frozen at −80°C until protein extraction. Ovaries were resuspended in 500 μL of chilled lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 137 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, and 10% glycerol) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340, Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and homogenized with an Ultra-Turrax (IKA-Werke GmbH & Co) homogenizer. The lysate was centrifuged at 13,000 x g for 10 min at 4ºC and the pellet was discarded. Protein concentrations in the supernatant were measured by the Bradford assay [16]. Equal protein samples (30 µg) were solubilized with SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer, boiling for 5 min, and electrophoresed through a 12% SDS gel. The separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Nitrocellulose membranes were blocked for 1 h in 5% low-fat powdered milk at room temperature and incubated with the primary antibodies (BCL-XS/L, Santa Cruz sc-634, 1:200; caspase 3, Santa Cruz sc-7148, 1:200; Cleaved caspase 3, Cell Signalling 9661, 1:100; BAX, Santa Cruz sc-493, 1:200; BCL-2, Santa Cruz sc-492, 1:200; AMH, Santa Cruz sc-6886, 1:200; GDF-9, Abcam Ab93892, 1:500; Kit Ligand (KL), Santa Cruz sc-9132, 1:200; β-actin, Abcam Ab6276, 1:2000; GAPDH, Cell Signaling #2118, 1:10000; β-tubulin, Sigma T0198, 1:10000) diluted in 1% low-fat powdered milk at 4°C. After overnight incubation, membranes were incubated with the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG, Sigma A4914, 1:1000 or goat anti-mouse IgG, R&D HAF007, 1:4000), diluted in 1% low-fat powdered milk at room temperature for 1 h, and the signal was detected by chemiluminescent substrate ECL (Pierce, Rockford, USA). The protein levels were analyzed by densitometry quantification using ImageJ 1.42q software (NIH) and expressed as arbitrary units. Consistency of protein loading was evaluated using β-actin, β-tubulin, or GAPDH as control loading.

2.5. Co-Culture

In this study, we used the immortalized human epithelial-like endometriotic cell line 12Z [17] and the human granulosa tumor cell line KGN (RIKEN Bioresource Centre, Tsukuba, Japan). All cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin.
150,000 KGN cells were seeded in 6-well culture plates, and 150,000 12Z cells were plated into transwell inserts for six-well plates in DMEM/1%, FCS 1%, glutamine, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Granulosa cells were cultured alone or co-cultured with 12Z cells for 48 h.

2.6. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Analysis

KGN cell RNA isolation was performed using the Quick-RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Subsequently, 10 ng of extracted RNA per sample were converted to complementary DNAs (cDNAs) using a SuperScript VILO kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA).
cDNAs were mixed with TaqMan gene probes (human 18S rRNA Hs99999901_s1, AMH Hs00174915_m1, AMHR2 Hs01086646_g1, MTOR Hs00234508_m1) and TaqMan master mix. The gene expressions were quantified using Step 1 real-time PCR (RT-PCR, Applied Biosystems, USA). Relative gene expression was evaluated using the 2(-∆∆Ct) method after normalization to 18S rRNA.
Alternatively, cDNAs were mixed with the Applied Biosystems SYBR Green PCR Master Mix. To confirm the specificity of the signal obtained, melting curves were done in each run observed. Relative expression was calculated using ribosomal protein large P0 (RPLP0) as an endogenous control. The sequences of the oligonucleotide primers used were the following: KITLG (5′-AAAATCATTCAAGAGCCCAG and 5′-CCTTTCTCAGGACTTAATGTTG), RPLP0 (5′-ACAGGGCGACCTGGAAGTCCAACTA and 5′-AGCCCACAATTGTCTGCTCCCACA). Data were analyzed following the model of Pfaffl [18].

2.7. Data Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Representative blots and tissue sections are shown in the figures. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student’s t-test. p <0.05 were considered significant. Data were statistically analyzed using GraphPad PRISM software 6.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., USA).

3. Results

3.1. Endometriosis alters Folliculogenesis In Vivo

To investigate the effect of endometriosis on folliculogenesis, we surgically induced peritoneal endometriosis in female adult Sprague Dawley rats, and after one month, we counted the number of follicles in each stage and the number of corpora lutea in hematoxylin-eosin-stained ovary sections (Figure 1). Rats with endometriosis showed a diminished number of total ovarian structures (i.e., follicles + corpora lutea) (p<0.05 vs. Sham, Figure 1A). This decrease was related to a low number of total follicles (p<0.05 vs. Sham) since no significant changes were observed in the number of corpora lutea between Sham and Endometriosis rats (Figure 1A). Next, we studied the number and proportion of follicles at different stages. Data showed that rats with endometriosis have a decreased number of primordial (p<0.05), primary (p<0.01), preantral, and late antral follicles (p<0.05) compared to Sham rats (Figure 1B). In addition, the proportion of primary (p<0.01) and late antral follicles (p<0.05) were diminished, whereas the proportion of atretic follicles was increased (p<0.01) in the ovaries from Endometriosis rats compared to Sham rats (Figure 1B).

3.2. Endometriosis Increases Ovarian Apoptosis In Vivo

Since we observed an increase in the proportion of atretic follicles, we decided to evaluate apoptosis in the ovary (Figure 2). It is known that follicles are more susceptible to atresia from the early antral stage onwards [19], so we evaluated the number of TUNEL-positive follicles (i.e., follicles that have one apoptotic cell at least) and the number of apoptotic cells per follicle in early antral, late antral and preovulatory follicles from Sham and Endometriosis rats.
We have observed no significant changes in the number of apoptotic cells per follicle in ovaries from rats with and without endometriosis in any of the analyzed stages (Figure 2A). However, the number of late antral follicles that were TUNEL-positive was increased in rats with endometriosis compared to Sham ones (Figure 2A, p<0.05). No significant differences were seen in early antral and preovulatory follicles (Figure 2A). In addition, rats with endometriosis showed an increase in the number of apoptotic cells per area of corpus luteum (Figure 2B, p<0.01) although no changes were seen in the proportion of TUNEL-positive corpora lutea (Figure 2B).

3.3. Endometriosis Alters the Expression of Proteins Related to Apoptosis in the Ovary In Vivo

Hereafter we evaluated the expression of different apoptotic-related proteins by western blot in order to determine the pathways involved in ovarian apoptosis in rats with endometriosis (Figure 3). First, we assessed the expression of one of the most ubiquitous effector caspases, caspase 3, and its precursor, procaspase 3 (Figure 3A). Although we have observed no significant changes in caspase 3 expression, the levels of procaspase 3 were increased in the ovaries from rats with endometriosis (Figure 3A, p<0.05 vs. Sham). Next, we studied the extrinsic (Figure 3B) and intrinsic (Figure 3C) apoptotic pathways by evaluating the expression of Fas and Fas ligand (FasL), as well as several BCL-2 family proteins. BCL-2 expression was decreased in the ovaries from rats with endometriosis (Figure 3C, p<0.05 vs. Sham). Despite there being some tendencies, we have seen no significant changes in the expression of Fas, FasL, BAX, BCL-XS, and BCL-XL in the ovaries from rats with and without endometriosis (Figure 3B,C). However, when we analyzed the ratio between pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family proteins, we determined that BCL-XS/BCL-2 and BCL-XS/BCL-XL ratios were increased in rats with endometriosis compared to Sham rats (Figure 3C, p<0.05), but there were no significant differences in BAX/BCL-2 or BAX/BCL-XL ratios (Figure 3C).

3.4. Endometriosis Alters the Expression of mRNA and Proteins Related to Folliculogenesis In Vivo and In Vitro

Next, we evaluated AMH, KIT ligand (KL), and GDF-9 protein expression in ovaries from rats with and without endometriosis (Figure 4). Endometriosis decreased AMH protein expression (Figure 4A, p<0.05 vs. Sham) although no significant changes have been seen in KITLG (KL mRNA) or GDF-9 expression (Figure 4B and 4C). In addition, we evaluated the effect of endometriotic cell-released factors on granulosa cell protein expression in vitro. We co-cultivated the KGN granulosa cell line with the 12Z endometriotic cell line and analyzed AMH, AMHR2, KL, and MTOR mRNA expression in granulosa cells (Figure 5). AMHR2 mRNA expression was increased in KGN cells co-cultured with 12Z cells compared to KGN cells alone (Figure 5B, p<0.05). Consistently with the result observed in vivo, KL mRNA expression was decreased in KGN cells co-cultured with 12Z cells (Figure 5C, p<0.05). Although we have observed no significant changes in AMH and MTOR mRNA expression in the presence of 12Z cells there was a tendency to decrease compared to KGN cells cultured alone (Figure 5A, 5D).

4. Discussion

A substantial body of empirical evidence has established the adverse effects of endometriosis on ovarian follicles. However, the etiology and implications of this ovarian dysfunction in the context of endometriosis remain poorly understood. Ovarian impairment may stem from the intrinsic pathophysiology of endometriosis or from surgical interventions aimed at excising endometriotic lesions [9]. This is particularly evident in cases of ovarian endometriomas, where surgical procedures can directly compromise the ovarian reserve.
Moreover, some research has shown that ovarian tissue damage may occur even in the presence of ovarian endometriomas smaller than 4 cm [20]. Maintaining an altered cellular microenvironment in these cases may induce long-term cellular damage and even malignant transformation of the surrounding normal tissue [21]. These findings suggest that endometriomas may exert a detrimental effect on ovarian tissue, even in the absence of visible morphological or molecular changes [22].
Despite these advances, little is known about how peritoneal endometriosis specifically affects ovarian follicles. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of peritoneal endometriosis on ovarian function, pointing to ovarian reserve and apoptosis.
The ovarian reserve, composed of dormant primordial follicles, is regulated by mechanisms that continuously suppress follicular activation. Excessive activation of these follicles can lead to their premature depletion, resulting in diminished ovarian reserve. In the context of endometriosis, Kitajima et al. observed that women with ovarian endometriomas have a reduced proportion of primordial follicles and an increased proportion of growing follicles [23].
Our findings demonstrate that peritoneal endometriosis significantly reduces the total number of follicles, including primordial, primaries, preantral, and late antral follicles. Additionally, the proportion of atretic follicles was markedly increased in the ovaries of rats with endometriosis compared to Sham ones, suggesting a deleterious effect of peritoneal endometriosis on ovarian health.
Evidence has indicated the presence of systemic oxidative stress in women diagnosed with endometriosis, in addition to elevated levels of oxidative stress in their peritoneal fluid [24], which may subsequently impact the ovaries and influence folliculogenesis. Recent research indicates that oxidative stress leads to abnormal signaling pathways, accelerating ovarian aging by inducing granulosa cell apoptosis [25,26]. Apoptosis occurring within ovarian cells can lead to significant follicular atresia or regression and is regarded as a critical mechanism contributing to the phenomenon of ovarian senescence [26].
Consistently, in this work we observed that peritoneal endometriosis led to a significant increase in late antral follicles that were TUNEL-positive as well as in the number of TUNEL-positive cells in corpora lutea, indicating higher levels of apoptosis. Concomitantly, altered expression of apoptosis-related proteins was observed, with increased procaspase 3 and decreased BCL-2 expression and a major ratio of proapoptotic/antiapoptotic proteins like BCL-XS/BCL-2 and BCL-XS/BCL-XL, suggesting the intrinsic apoptotic pathway involvement. Although no changes in Fas/FasL expression were detected, the contribution of additional extrinsic apoptotic pathway components in endometriosis-induced apoptosis cannot be ruled out.
Next, we evaluated the effect of experimental peritoneal endometriosis on the expression of key molecules involved in folliculogenesis.
AMH is a well-established biomarker of ovarian reserve and a key indicator of ovarian aging [27]. Functionally, AMH plays a critical role in preserving ovarian reserve by suppressing the activation of primordial follicles. Additionally, it modulates the growth of preantral and small antral follicles by reducing their sensitivity to FSH [28].
Since AMH is only produced by granulosa cells of growing follicles, serum levels are a reflection of its ovarian expression [29]. Recently, Pedachenko et al. observed that infertile women with endometriosis, regardless of its type, had lower AMH concentrations compared with infertile women without endometriosis [11]. In addition, AMH levels in peritoneal fluid were positively correlated with serum AMH levels in both women with and without endometriosis [30]. However, as we pointed out before, most of the background in AMH and endometriosis focuses on ovarian endometriosis [31,32], leaving peritoneal endometriosis relatively understudied.
In our in vivo experimental model of peritoneal endometriosis, we observed a decrease in AMH expression, which is consistent with the mentioned decrease in the number of primordial follicles and indicates that endometriotic lesions negatively impact ovarian reserve besides not being in direct contact with them. This reduction in AMH levels may reflect impaired folliculogenesis, potentially due to disrupted granulosa cell function. Interestingly, despite the decreased AMH expression, the increased levels of AMHR2 observed in vitro may indicate an adaptive response to alterations in local signaling pathways. The elevated AMHR2 expression in granulosa cells co-cultured with 12Z endometriotic cells suggests that AMHR2, a receptor involved in follicular development signaling, may be upregulated to counterbalance the altered ovarian environment induced by endometriosis. This response is consistent with findings in other contexts, such as bovine oocyte exposure to bisphenols, where a reduction in AMH expression was accompanied by an increase in AMHR2 mRNA and protein levels [33]. Additionally, in vitro experiments showed no significant changes in AMH and MTOR mRNA expression in KGN cells co-cultured with 12Z cells, although a decreasing trend was observed compared to KGN cells cultured alone. Further studies are necessary to validate this pattern and elucidate the potential role of MTOR in mediating the adverse effects of endometriosis on ovarian reserve.
KL, a growth factor synthesized by granulosa cells, plays a key role in oogenesis and folliculogenesis [34]. Through the interaction with the KIT receptor, KL activates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in dormant oocytes and induces their growth [35]. A few years ago, Takeuchi et al. hypothesized that endometriomas drive excessive primordial follicle activation through the PI3K-PTEN-Akt-Foxo3 signaling pathway, a mechanism identified in both mouse models and human ovarian samples [36]. This aberrant activation can lead to a depletion of the ovarian reserve, directly affecting the patient’s fertility.
On the other hand, KL can act as an antiapoptotic factor on oocytes in primordial follicles [37] and in granulosa cells [38]. In a recent study developed in mice with postnatal deletion of KIT, there were no defects in early follicle development. However, as mice matured, they experienced a complete loss of ovarian reserve and function, leading to infertility. Additionally, mice displayed smaller ovarian size and weight, delayed folliculogenesis, reduced AMH, and absence of ovarian follicles [39]. At the same time, higher cleaved caspase 3 levels were observed in the granulosa cells of these ovaries, suggesting an increase in apoptosis due to the lack of the anti-apoptotic signal exerted by KL [39].
In this study, KITLG mRNA expression was significantly decreased in granulosa cells co-cultured with endometriotic cells, suggesting that soluble factors released by the latter may disrupt critical processes involved in oocyte growth and follicular development and could play a role in infertility commonly associated with endometriosis.
Moreover, previous studies have highlighted the pivotal role of GDF-9 in primordial follicle activation and follicular development, as well as in stimulating the expression of KL and its receptor KIT in granulosa cells [40]. The lack of significant changes in GDF-9 and KL protein expression in the ovary in vivo suggests that endometriosis may impair ovarian apoptosis and follicular development through alternative mechanisms. These findings underscore the intricate relationship between endometriosis and ovarian function and highlight the need for further investigation into the role of KL in the infertility associated with this multifactorial disease.

5. Conclusions

Our findings underscore the significant impact of peritoneal endometriosis on ovarian health, particularly through its detrimental effects on folliculogenesis and ovarian reserve. The observed reduction in follicle numbers, increased apoptosis, and downregulation of critical factors such as AMH and KL highlight the multifaceted mechanisms by which endometriosis impairs ovarian function. Additionally, the disruption of granulosa cell function and altered signaling pathways, including increased proapoptotic protein expression, suggest a complex interplay between local and systemic factors. These results emphasize the potential role of peritoneal endometriosis in accelerating ovarian aging and contributing to infertility, warranting further research to elucidate the molecular pathways involved and develop targeted therapeutic strategies

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.; methodology, A.R. T.B, C.O., S.d.V, J.S. and M.B.; formal analysis, M.B.; investigation, A.R, G.M. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R., M.B; writing—review and editing, A.R., M.B. and G.M..; visualization, M.B. G.M.; supervision, M.B.; funding acquisition, M.B, R.I.B and G.M; resources, R.I.B., K.G.D. and G.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ANPCYT (PRESTAMO BID PICT N°01632), CONICET (PIP 1223), Buenos Aires, Argentina and EU MSCA-RISE-2015 project MOMENDO (691058).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Instituto de Biología y Medicina Experimental (IBYME) CE 025-2/2012.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [G.M.], on special request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Pauliina Damdimopoulou from the Chemicals and Fertility Laboratory, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, for providing the KGN cells, KITLG and RPLP0 primers. In addition, we would like to acknowledge Fundación René Barón, Fundación Williams, and Fundación Honorio Bigand for providing institutional support to IBYME.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zondervan, K.T.; Becker, C.M.; Koga, K.; Missmer, S.A.; Taylor, R.N.; Viganò, P. Endometriosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Requadt, E.; Nahlik, A.J.; Jacobsen, A.; Ross, W.T. Patient Experiences of Endometriosis Diagnosis: A Mixed Methods Approach. BJOG 2024, 131, 941–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vercellini, P.; Viganò, P.; Bandini, V.; Buggio, L.; Berlanda, N.; Somigliana, E. Association of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis with Pregnancy and Infertility. Fertil Steril 2023, 119, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chapron, C.; Marcellin, L.; Borghese, B.; Santulli, P. Rethinking Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Management of Endometriosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2019, 15, 666–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Matsuzaki, S.; Pankhurst, M.W. Hyperactivation of Dormant Primordial Follicles in Ovarian Endometrioma Patients. Reproduction 2020, 160, R145–R153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Findlay, J.K.; Hutt, K.J.; Hickey, M.; Anderson, R.A. What Is the “Ovarian Reserve”? Fertil Steril 2015, 103, 628–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dewailly, D.; Andersen, C.Y.; Balen, A.; Broekmans, F.; Dilaver, N.; Fanchin, R.; Griesinger, G.; Kelsey, T.W.; La Marca, A.; Lambalk, C.; et al. The Physiology and Clinical Utility of Anti-Mullerian Hormone in Women. Hum Reprod Update 2014, 20, 370–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jiang, D.; Nie, X. Effect of Endometrioma and Its Surgical Excision on Fertility (Review). Exp Ther Med 2020, 20, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Casalechi, M.; Di Stefano, G.; Fornelli, G.; Somigliana, E.; Viganò, P. Impact of Endometriosis on the Ovarian Follicles. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2024, 92, 102430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rangi, S.; Hur, C.; Richards, E.; Falcone, T. Fertility Preservation in Women with Endometriosis. J Clin Med 2023, 12, 1302–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pedachenko, N.; Anagnostis, P.; Shemelko, T.; Tukhtarian, R.; Alabbas, L. Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Prolactin and Estradiol Concentrations in Infertile Women with Endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021, 37, 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ata, B.; Uncu, G. Impact of Endometriomas and Their Removal on Ovarian Reserve. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015, 27, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mc Cormack, B.A.; Olivares, C.N.; Madanes, D.; Ricci, A.G.; Bilotas, M.A.; Barañao, R.I. Effect of Urolithins A and B on Ectopic Endometrial Growth in a Murine Model of Endometriosis. Food Funct 2021, 12, 9894–9903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Woodruff, T.K.; Lyon, R.J.; Hansen, S.E.; Rice, G.C.; Mather, J.P. Inhibin and Activin Locally Regulate Rat Ovarian Folliculogenesis. Endocrinology 1990, 127, 3196–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Scotti, L.; Irusta, G.; Abramovich, D.; Tesone, M.; Parborell, F. Administration of a Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Affects Corpus Luteum Vascular Stability and Development and Induces Luteal Apoptosis in a Rat Model of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2011, 335, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. MM, B. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zeitvogel, A.; Baumann, R.; Starzinski-Powitz, A. Identification of an Invasive, N-Cadherin-Expressing Epithelial Cell Type in Endometriosis Using a New Cell Culture Model. Am J Pathol 2001, 159, 1839–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pfaffl, M.W. A New Mathematical Model for Relative Quantification in Real-Time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29, E45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hsueh, A.J.W.; Billig, H.; Tsafriri, A. Ovarian Follicle Atresia: A Hormonally Controlled Apoptotic Process*. Endocr Rev 1994, 15, 707–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tang, Y.; Chen, S.L.; Chen, X.; He, Y.X.; Ye, D.S.; Guo, W.; Zheng, H.Y.; Yang, X.H. Ovarian Damage after Laparoscopic Endometrioma Excision Might Be Related to the Size of Cyst. Fertil Steril 2013, 100, 464–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Torng, P.-L. Clinical Implication for Endometriosis Associated with Ovarian Cancer. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2017, 6, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Di Nisio, V.; Rossi, G.; Di Luigi, G.; Palumbo, P.; D’Alfonso, A.; Iorio, R.; Cecconi, S. Increased Levels of Proapoptotic Markers in Normal Ovarian Cortex Surrounding Small Endometriotic Cysts. Reprod Biol 2019, 19, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kitajima, M.; Dolmans, M.-M.; Donnez, O.; Masuzaki, H.; Soares, M.; Donnez, J. Enhanced Follicular Recruitment and Atresia in Cortex Derived from Ovaries with Endometriomas. Fertil Steril 2014, 101, 1031–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Nasiri, N.; Moini, A.; Eftekhari-Yazdi, P.; Karimian, L.; Salman-Yazdi, R.; Arabipoor, A. Oxidative Stress Statues in Serum and Follicular Fluid of Women with Endometriosis. Cell J 2017, 18, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xing, Y.; Miao, C.; Zhao, Y.; Chang, X.; Zhang, Q. The Role of Oxidative Stress and Natural Antioxidants in Ovarian Aging. Front Pharmacol 2021, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yan, F.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Kong, X.; Shu, C.; Liu, Y.; Shi, Y. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Ovarian Aging: A Review. J Ovarian Res 2022, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Iwase, A.; Hasegawa, Y.; Tsukui, Y.; Kobayashi, M.; Hiraishi, H.; Nakazato, T.; Kitahara, Y. Anti-Müllerian Hormone beyond an Ovarian Reserve Marker: The Relationship with the Physiology and Pathology in the Life-Long Follicle Development. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Durlinger, A.; Visser, J.; Themmen, A. Regulation of Ovarian Function: The Role of Anti-Mullerian Hormone. Reproduction 2002, 124, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, H.; Liu, K. Cellular and Molecular Regulation of the Activation of Mammalian Primordial Follicles: Somatic Cells Initiate Follicle Activation in Adulthood. Hum Reprod Update 2015, 21, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kitajima, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Murakami, N.; Kajimura, I.; Harada, A.; Kitajima, Y.; Masuzaki, H.; Miura, K. AMH Concentrations in Peritoneal Fluids of Women With and Without Endometriosis. Front Surg 2020, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pais, A.S.; Flagothier, C.; Tebache, L.; Almeida Santos, T.; Nisolle, M. Impact of Surgical Management of Endometrioma on AMH Levels and Pregnancy Rates: A Review of Recent Literature. J Clin Med 2021, 10, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Younis, J.S.; Shapso, N.; Ben-Sira, Y.; Nelson, S.M.; Izhaki, I. Endometrioma Surgery-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect on Antral Follicle Count and Anti-Müllerian Hormone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Saleh, A.C.; Sabry, R.; Mastromonaco, G.F.; Favetta, L.A. BPA and BPS Affect the Expression of Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) and Its Receptor during Bovine Oocyte Maturation and Early Embryo Development. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2021, 19, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thomas, F.H.; Vanderhyden, B.C. Oocyte-Granulosa Cell Interactions during Mouse Follicular Development: Regulation of Kit Ligand Expression and Its Role in Oocyte Growth. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2006, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zhang, H.; Liu, K. Cellular and Molecular Regulation of the Activation of Mammalian Primordial Follicles: Somatic Cells Initiate Follicle Activation in Adulthood. Hum Reprod Update 2015, 21, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Takeuchi, A.; Koga, K.; Satake, E.; Makabe, T.; Taguchi, A.; Miyashita, M.; Takamura, M.; Yoshino, O.; Wada-hiraike, O.; Fujii, T.; et al. Endometriosis Triggers Excessive Activation of Primordial Follicles via PI3K-PTEN-Akt-Foxo3 Pathway. 2019. [CrossRef]
  37. Jin, X.; Han, C.; Yu, F.; Wei, P.; Hu, Z.; Liu, Y. Anti-apoptotic Action of Stem Cell Factor on Oocytes in Primordial Follicles and Its Signal Transduction. Mol Reprod Dev 2005, 70, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Panwar, D.; Rawal, L.; Ali, S. The Potential Role of the KFG and KITLG Proteins in Preventing Granulosa Cell Apoptosis in Bubalus Bubalis. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 2023, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Luan, Y.; So, W.; Dong, R.; Abazarikia, A.; Kim, S.Y. KIT in Oocytes: A Key Factor for Oocyte Survival and Reproductive Lifespan. EBioMedicine 2024, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Park, M.J.; Ahn, J.-W.; Kim, K.H.; Bang, J.; Kim, S.C.; Jeong, J.Y.; Choi, Y.E.; Kim, C.-W.; Joo, B.S. Prediction of Ovarian Aging Using Ovarian Expression of BMP15, GDF9, and C-KIT. Exp Biol Med 2020, 245, 711–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effect of surgically induced endometriosis on folliculogenesis in vivo. A: The number of follicles, corpora lutea, and total ovarian structures (i.e., follicles + corpora lutea) were assessed in ovarian sections from rats with and without endometriosis (Sham). B: The number and proportion of each follicular stage were determined. C: Representative micrographs show histological sections of ovaries from Sham (i, iii) and Endometriosis (ii, iv) rats. Ovarian structures are indicated: Corpora lutea (*), late antral follicles (#), preovulatory follicles (&), primordial follicles (white arrows), primary follicles (black arrows), and preantral follicles (black arrowhead). Magnification 20X (i, ii) and 400X (iii, iv). Scale bar indicates 500 µm (ii) or 200 µm (iv). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Sham: n=6, Endometriosis: Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 Sham vs. Endometriosis.
Figure 1. Effect of surgically induced endometriosis on folliculogenesis in vivo. A: The number of follicles, corpora lutea, and total ovarian structures (i.e., follicles + corpora lutea) were assessed in ovarian sections from rats with and without endometriosis (Sham). B: The number and proportion of each follicular stage were determined. C: Representative micrographs show histological sections of ovaries from Sham (i, iii) and Endometriosis (ii, iv) rats. Ovarian structures are indicated: Corpora lutea (*), late antral follicles (#), preovulatory follicles (&), primordial follicles (white arrows), primary follicles (black arrows), and preantral follicles (black arrowhead). Magnification 20X (i, ii) and 400X (iii, iv). Scale bar indicates 500 µm (ii) or 200 µm (iv). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Sham: n=6, Endometriosis: Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01 Sham vs. Endometriosis.
Preprints 145611 g001
Figure 2. Effect of endometriosis on ovarian apoptosis in vivo. A: The number of apoptotic cells per follicle and the proportion of follicles with apoptotic cells were determined by TUNEL. Micrographs of histological sections show follicles from rats with (Endo) and without endometriosis (Sham). B: The number of apoptotic cells per corpus luteum area and the proportion of corpora lutea with apoptotic cells were assessed by TUNEL. Micrographs of histological sections show corpora lutea from rats with (Endo) and without endometriosis (Sham). Arrows indicate TUNEL-positive (TUNEL+) cells. As a negative control, an ovarian section was subjected to treatment without TdT (inset). Magnification 400X. Scale bar indicates 100 μm. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Sham: n=6, Endometriosis: n=6. Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test. * p<0.05 Sham vs. Endometriosis.
Figure 2. Effect of endometriosis on ovarian apoptosis in vivo. A: The number of apoptotic cells per follicle and the proportion of follicles with apoptotic cells were determined by TUNEL. Micrographs of histological sections show follicles from rats with (Endo) and without endometriosis (Sham). B: The number of apoptotic cells per corpus luteum area and the proportion of corpora lutea with apoptotic cells were assessed by TUNEL. Micrographs of histological sections show corpora lutea from rats with (Endo) and without endometriosis (Sham). Arrows indicate TUNEL-positive (TUNEL+) cells. As a negative control, an ovarian section was subjected to treatment without TdT (inset). Magnification 400X. Scale bar indicates 100 μm. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Sham: n=6, Endometriosis: n=6. Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test. * p<0.05 Sham vs. Endometriosis.
Preprints 145611 g002
Figure 3. Effect of endometriosis on the expression of apoptosis-related proteins in vivo. Protein expression was evaluated by western blot in ovarian homogenates from rats with and without endometriosis (Sham). A: procaspase 3 and caspase 3 p17 and p19 cleaved fragments; B: Fas and FasL proteins (extrinsic apoptotic pathway); C: BCL-2 family members proteins (intrinsic apoptotic pathway, upper panel) and pro-apoptotic to anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members ratio (lower panel). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Representative blots are presented below each graph. N is expressed in parentheses in each bar. Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test. * p<0.05 Sham vs. Endometriosis.
Figure 3. Effect of endometriosis on the expression of apoptosis-related proteins in vivo. Protein expression was evaluated by western blot in ovarian homogenates from rats with and without endometriosis (Sham). A: procaspase 3 and caspase 3 p17 and p19 cleaved fragments; B: Fas and FasL proteins (extrinsic apoptotic pathway); C: BCL-2 family members proteins (intrinsic apoptotic pathway, upper panel) and pro-apoptotic to anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family members ratio (lower panel). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Representative blots are presented below each graph. N is expressed in parentheses in each bar. Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test. * p<0.05 Sham vs. Endometriosis.
Preprints 145611 g003
Figure 4. Effect of endometriosis on the expression of folliculogenesis-related proteins in vivo. Protein expression was assessed by western blot in ovarian homogenates from rats with and without endometriosis (Sham). A: AMH; B: KL; C: GDF-9. The upper panels show quantification, and the lower panels show representative blots. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. N is expressed in parentheses in each bar. Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test. * p<0.05 Sham vs. Endometriosis.
Figure 4. Effect of endometriosis on the expression of folliculogenesis-related proteins in vivo. Protein expression was assessed by western blot in ovarian homogenates from rats with and without endometriosis (Sham). A: AMH; B: KL; C: GDF-9. The upper panels show quantification, and the lower panels show representative blots. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. N is expressed in parentheses in each bar. Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test. * p<0.05 Sham vs. Endometriosis.
Preprints 145611 g004
Figure 5. Effect of endometriotic cells on the expression of folliculogenesis-related genes in granulosa cells in vitro. The AMH (A), AMHR2 (B), KITLG (C) and MTOR (D) mRNA expressions were assessed in KGN granulosa cells by RT-qPCR. KGN cells were cultured alone (KGN) or co-cultured with 12Z endometriotic cells (KGN+12Z) for 48 h. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. N is expressed in parentheses in each bar. Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test.* p<0.05 KGN vs. KGN+12Z.
Figure 5. Effect of endometriotic cells on the expression of folliculogenesis-related genes in granulosa cells in vitro. The AMH (A), AMHR2 (B), KITLG (C) and MTOR (D) mRNA expressions were assessed in KGN granulosa cells by RT-qPCR. KGN cells were cultured alone (KGN) or co-cultured with 12Z endometriotic cells (KGN+12Z) for 48 h. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. N is expressed in parentheses in each bar. Statistical comparisons were performed by the Student “t” test.* p<0.05 KGN vs. KGN+12Z.
Preprints 145611 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated