Submitted:
08 January 2025
Posted:
09 January 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
2.2. Procedure
2.3. Participants
2.4. Instruments
2.4.1. Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
2.4.2. Grip Strength
2.4.3. Isokinetic Strength Testing of the Shoulder
2.4.4. Serve Testing Protocol
3. Results
3.1. Correlation Analysis Between Serve Speed and Performance Metrics or Segment Mass
3.2. Graphical Representation of Findings

3.3. Mediation Analysis
3.4. Moderation Analysis
3.5. Summary of Findings
4. Discussion
4.1. Hypothesis
4.2. Comparison with Previous Studies
4.3. Integration of the Study Findings
4.4. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chang, C.; Qiu, Y.-R. Constructing a Gaming Model for Professional Tennis Players Using the C5.0 Algorithm. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8222, 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Avilés, C.; Navia, J. A.; Ruiz, L. M.; Martínez de Quel, Ó. Do Expert Tennis Players Actually Demonstrate Anticipatory Behavior When Returning a First Serve under Representative Conditions? A Systematic Review Including Quality Assessment and Methodological Recommendations. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2019, 43 (2019), 16–26. [CrossRef]
- Reid, M.; Whiteside, D.; Elliott, B. Serving to Different Locations: Set-up, Toss, and Racket Kinematics of the Professional Tennis Serve. Sport. Biomech. 2011, 10 (4), 407–414. [CrossRef]
- Baiget, E.; Corbi, F.; Fuentes, J. P.; Fernández-Fernández, J. The Relationship between Maximum Isometric Strength and Ball Velocity in the Tennis Serve. J. Hum. Kinet. 2016, 53 (1), 63–71. [CrossRef]
- Bonato, M.; Maggioni, M. A.; Rossi, C.; Rampichini, S.; Torre, A. La. Relationship between Anthropometric or Functional Characteristics and Maximal Serve Velocity in Professional Tennis Players. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 2015, 55 (10), 1157–1165.
- Brito, A. V; Fonseca, P.; Costa, M. J.; Cardoso, R.; Santos, C. C.; Fernandez-fernandez, J.; Fernandes, R. J. The Influence of Kinematics on Tennis Serve Speed : An In-Depth Analysis Using Xsens MVN Biomech Link Technology. Bioengineering 2024, 11 (10), 971.
- Chow, J. W.; Carlton, L. G.; Lim, Y. T.; Chae, W. S.; Shim, J. H.; Kuenster, A. F.; Kokubun, K. Comparing the Pre- and Post-Impact Ball and Racquet Kinematics of Elite Tennis Players’ First and Second Serves: A Preliminary Study. J. Sports Sci. 2003, 21 (7), 529–537. [CrossRef]
- Cohen, D. B.; Mont, M. A.; Campbell, K. R.; Vogelstein, B. N.; Loewy, J. W. Upper Extremity Physical Factors Affecting Tennis Serve Velocity. Am. J. Sports Med. 1994, 22 (6), 746–750. [CrossRef]
- Martin, C.; Kulpa, R.; Delamarche, P.; Bideau, B. Professional Tennis Players’ Serve: Correlation between Segmental Angular Momentums and Ball Velocity. Sport. Biomech. 2013, 12 (1), 2–14. [CrossRef]
- Hizan, H.; Whipp, P.; Reid, M. Comparison of Serve and Serve Return Statistics of High Performance Male and Female Tennis Players from Different Age-Groups. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport 2011, 11 (2), 365–375. [CrossRef]
- Jacquier-Bret, J.; Gorce, P. Kinematics of the Tennis Serve Using an Optoelectronic Motion Capture System: Are There Correlations between Joint Angles and Racket Velocity? Sensors 2024, 24 (11), 3292. [CrossRef]
- Myers, N. A Biomechanically Based Observational Tennis Serve Analysis Method Can Be Used to Assess Serve Mechanics. ProQuest Diss. Theses 2017, No. 2016, 120.
- Abrams, G. D.; Sheets, A. L.; Andriacchi, T. P.; Safran, M. R. Sports Biomechanics Review of Tennis Serve Motion Analysis and the Biomechanics of Three Serve Types with Implications for Injury. Sport. Biomech. 2011, 10 (4), 378–390. [CrossRef]
- Pugh, S. F.; Kovaleski, J. E.; Heitman, R. J.; Gilley, W. F. Upper and Lower Body Strength in Relation. Percept. Mot. Skills 2003, 97, 867–872.
- Wong, F. K. H.; Keung, J. H. K.; Lau, N. M. L.; Ng, D. K. S.; Chung, J. W. Y.; Chow, D. H. K. Effects of Body Mass Index and Full Body Kinematics on Tennis Serve Speed. J. Hum. Kinet. 2014, 40 (1), 21–28. [CrossRef]
- Hayes, M.; Spits, D.; Watts, D.; Kelly, V. Realtionship between Tennis Serve Velocit and Select Performance Measures. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2021, 35 (1), 190–197.
- Mont, M. A.; Cohen, D. B.; Campbell, K. R.; Gravare, K.; Mathur, S. K. Isokinetic Concentric Versus Eccentric Training of Shoulder Rotators with Functional Evaluation of Performance Enhancement in Elite Tennis Players. Am. J. Sports Med. 2005, 97 (1), 746–750. [CrossRef]
- Rajput, C.; Pachpute, S.; Lokesh, R.; Kishore, M. Comparative Study of Grip Strength Assessment in Tennis Player with and without Shoulder Pain. Acta Sci. Orthop. 2022, 5 (10), 52–55. [CrossRef]
- Dobos, K.; Novak, D.; Tóth, J. P.; Ökrös, C. Rate of Force Development During a Handgrip Task Is Correlated with the Post-Impact Ball Speed of the Flat Serve. Sports 2024, 12 (11), 1–12. [CrossRef]
- Seydioglu, R. S. and C. An Examınatıon of Grıp Strength and Arm Angles of Elite Level of Tennıs Players Wıth Relatıon to Theır Sports. Int. J. Dev. Res. 2017, 7 (11), 16892–16894.
- Chabungbam, S. “Effects of Resisted Exercises on Grip Strength in Tennis Players.” J. Med. Dent. Sci. Res. 2022, 9 (6), 23–29.
- Colomar, J.; Baiget, E.; Corbi, F. Influence of Strength, Power, and Muscular Stiffness on Stroke Velocity in Junior Tennis Players. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11 (March), 1–9. [CrossRef]
- Roetert, E. P.; Kovacs, M.; Knudson, D.; Groppel, J. L. Biomechanics of the Tennis Groundstrokes: Implications for Strength Training. Strength Cond. J. 2009, 31 (4), 41–49. [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Pay, A.; Ramón-Llin, J.; Martínez-Gallego, R.; Sanz-Rivas, D.; Sánchez-Alcaraz, B. J.; Frutos, S. Fitness Testing in Tennis: Influence of Anthropometric Characteristics, Physical Performance, and Functional Test on Serve Velocity in Professional Players. PLoS One 2021, 16 (11), 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Nana, A.; Slater, G. J.; Stewart, A. D.; Burke, L. M. Methodology Review: Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for the Assessment of Body Composition in Athletes and Active People. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2015, 25 (2), 198–215. [CrossRef]
- Nana, A.; Slater, G. J.; Hopkins, W. G.; Burke, L. M. Effects of Daily Activities on Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Measurements of Body Composition in Active People. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2012, 44 (1), 180–189. [CrossRef]
- Roberts, H. C.; Denison, H. J.; Martin, H. J.; Patel, H. P.; Syddall, H.; Cooper, C.; Sayer, A. A. A Review of the Measurement of Grip Strength in Clinical and Epidemiological Studies: Towards a Standardised Approach. Age Ageing 2011, 40 (4), 423–429. [CrossRef]
- Ellenbecker, T. S.; Davies, G. J.; Rowinski, M. J. Concentric versus Eccentric Isokinetic Strengthening of the Rotator Cuff: Objective Data versus Functional Test. Am. J. Sports Med. 1988, 16 (1), 64–69. [CrossRef]
- Ellenbecker, T.; Roetert, E. P. Age Specific Isokinetic Glenohumeral Internal and External Rotation Strength in Elite Junior Tennis Players. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2003, 6 (1), 63–70. [CrossRef]
- Ellenbecker, T. S. A Total Arm Strength Isokinetic Profile of Highly Skilled Tennis Players. Isokinet. Exerc. Sci. 1991, 1 (1), 9–21. [CrossRef]
- Ölmez, C.; Hammami, N.; Apaydın, N.; Hattabi, S.; Şar, H.; Khezami, M. A.; İnce, A. Is Isokinetic Shoulder Strength a Determinant of Serve Ball Velocity in Tennis? Sport. Biomech. 2024, 1–14. [CrossRef]
- Ellenbecker, T. S.; Roetert, E. P. Testing Isokinetic Muscular Fatigue of Shoulder Internal and External Rotation in Elite Junior Tennis Players. J. Orthop. Sport. Phys. Ther. 1999, 29 (5), 275–281.
- Baron, R. M.; Kenny, D. A. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51 (6), 1173–1182. [CrossRef]
- Perry, A. C.; Wang, X.; Feldman, B. B.; Ruth, T.; Signorile, J. Can Laboratory-Based Tennis Profiles Predict Field Tests of Tennis Performance? J. Strength Cond. Res. 2008, 05 (1), 1–2.
- Johansson, F.; Asker, M.; Malmberg, A.; Fernandez-Fernandez, J.; Warnqvist, A.; Cools, A. Eccentric and Isometric Shoulder Rotation Strength and Range of Motion: Normative Values for Adolescent Competitive Tennis Players. Front. Sport. Act. Living 2022, 4 (February). [CrossRef]
- Moreno-Pérez, V.; López-Samanes, Á.; Domínguez, R.; Fernández-Elías, V. E.; González-Frutos, P.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Pérez-López, A.; Fernández-Fernández, J. Acute Effects of a Single Tennis Match on Passive Shoulder Rotation Range of Motion, Isometric Strength and Serve Speed in Professional Tennis Players. PLoS One 2019, 14 (4), 1–10. [CrossRef]
- Baiget, E.; Corbi, F.; Fuentes, J. P.; Fernández-Fernández, J. The Relationship Between Maximum Isometric Strength and Ball Velocity in the Tennis Serve. J. Hum. Kinet. 2016, 53, 63–71. [CrossRef]
- Signorile, J. F.; Sandler, D. J.; Smith, W. N.; Stoutenberg, M.; Perry, A. C. Correlation Analyses and Regression Modeling Between Isokinetic Testing and On-Court Performance in Competitive Adolescent Tennis Players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2005, 19 (3), 519–526. [CrossRef]
- Kovacs, M. S.; Ellenbecker, T. S. A Performance Evaluation of the Tennis Serve: Implications for Strength, Speed, Power, and Flexibility Training. Strength Cond. J. 2011, 33 (4), 22–30. [CrossRef]


| Variables | Mean | SD | CI Lower | CI Upper | SW |
| Internal Shoulder Rotation Con (210°/s, Nm) | 32.0 | 6.9 | 28.2 | 35.8 | 0.42 |
| External Shoulder Rotation Con (210°/s, Nm) | 21.1 | 4.2 | 18.8 | 23.5 | 0.98 |
| Internal Shoulder Rotation Ecc (210°/s, Nm) | 38.6 | 8.2 | 34 | 43.1 | 0.44 |
| External Shoulder Rotation Ecc (210°/s, Nm) | 32.7 | 7.6 | 28.5 | 36.9 | 0.01 |
| Internal Shoulder Rotation Ecc (300°/s, Nm) | 33.5 | 5.6 | 30.4 | 36.6 | 0.28 |
| External Shoulder Rotation Ecc (300°/s, Nm) | 30.1 | 5.0 | 27.3 | 32.9 | 0.64 |
| Internal Shoulder Rotation Con (300°/s, Nm) | 29.1 | 6.7 | 25.4 | 32.8 | 1.00 |
| External Shoulder Rotation Con (300°/s, Nm) | 20.9 | 3.7 | 18.9 | 22.9 | 0.99 |
| Serve Speed (km/h) | 172.4 | 10.9 | 166.4 | 178.5 | 0.41 |
| Arm Mass (kg) | 3.8 | 0.4 | 3.6 | 4 | 0.96 |
| Arm Mass – lean (kg) | 3.2 | 0.29 | 3 | 3.3 | 0.65 |
| Leg Mass (kg) | 11.5 | 1.4 | 10.7 | 12.3 | 0.55 |
| Leg Mass – lean (kg) | 9.3 | 1.2 | 8.7 | 10 | 0.63 |
| Trunk Mass (kg) | 31.9 | 3.0 | 30.2 | 33.6 | 0.45 |
| Trunk Mass – lean (kg) | 26.9 | 2.8 | 25.4 | 28.5 | 0.95 |
| Body mass (kg) | 66.1 | 5.7 | 63 | 69.3 | 0.9 |
| Body mass – lean (kg) | 54.8 | 5.1 | 52 | 57.6 | 0.96 |
| Grip Strength (kg) | 39.7 | 6.4 | 36.2 | 43.3 | 0.95 |
| Variables | ρ | p-values | Interpretation |
| Internal Shoulder Rotation Con (210°/s) | 0.61* | 0.016 | Moderate positive |
| External Shoulder Rotation Con (210°/s) | 0.71* | 0.003 | Moderate positive |
| Internal Shoulder Rotation Ecc (210°/s) | 0.41 | 0.128 | Weak positive (ns) |
| External Shoulder Rotation Ecc (210°/s) | 0.39 | 0.156 | Weak positive (ns) |
| Internal Shoulder Rotation Ecc (300°/s) | 0.35 | 0.196 | Weak positive (ns) |
| External Shoulder Rotation Ecc (300°/s) | 0.27 | 0.328 | Weak positive (ns) |
| Internal Shoulder Rotation Con (300°/s) | 0.56 | 0.030 | Weak positive |
| External Shoulder Rotation Con (300°/s) | 0.65* | 0.008 | Moderate positive |
| Arm Mass (kg) | 0.77* | 0.001 | Moderate positive |
| Arm Mass – lean (kg) | 0.85* | 0.001 | Strong positive |
| Leg Mass (kg) | 0.62* | 0.014 | Moderate positive |
| Leg Mass – lean (kg) | 0.66* | 0.002 | Moderate positive |
| Trunk Mass (kg) | 0.72* | 0.003 | Moderate positive |
| Trunk Mass – lean (kg) | 0.60* | 0.017 | Moderate positive |
| Grip Strength (kg) | 0.46 | 0.084 | Weak positive (ns) |
| Height (cm) | 0.68* | 0.006 | Moderate positive |
| Body mass (kg) | 0.81* | 0.001 | Strong positive |
| Body mass – lean (kg) | 0.73* | 0.002 | Moderate positive |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).