Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

A Systematic Review of Nursing Competencies: Addressing the Challenges of Evolving Healthcare Systems and Demographic Changes

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

23 December 2024

Posted:

24 December 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The role of nurses is poised to undergo significant transformations in the forthcoming years due to rapidly evolving sociocultural, environmental, and technological phenomena. Defining and assessing nursing competencies are crucial for ensuring quality nursing care and fostering professional growth. This literature review aimed to explore future nursing competencies and the sociocultural phenomena shaping them. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases using keywords such as “nursing competencies,” “future,” “healthcare systems,” and “demographic change.” Studies published within the last 5 years were included and underwent rigorous quality assessment. Results: The findings indicate that phenomena such as environmental sustainability, technology, innovation, globalization, urbanization, uncertain policies, and demographic evolution will significantly impact nursing competency development. Projections suggest that nearly 70% of the nursing workforce will operate in areas marked by high uncertainty and unpredictability. The review underscores the importance of cultivating interpersonal, higher-order cognitive, and system-level competencies, along with complementary competences in personal and customer services, decision-making, technology, creativity, and scientific methods. Conclusions: Addressing future challenges in nursing requires a holistic and strategic approach. This entails a cultural shift within the profession, supported by targeted policies and investments in training and continuous professional development. Education and training systems must prioritize the development of “structural” competencies and lifelong learning capacities.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The role of nurses is set to undergo profound changes in the coming years due to rapidly evolving sociocultural, environmental, and technological phenomena. According to some authors, competence can be defined as “an intrinsic individual characteristic causally linked to effective or superior performance in a task or situation, and which is measured on the basis of a predefined criterion” (Rahmawati et al., 2021; Fu’ad & Aminnudin 2020). As for nursing competencies, they can be defined as “a set of complex actions whose result is to guide nursing action in professional practice, and which can be evaluated through performance” (Egerod et al., 2021; Zumstein-Shaha & Grace 2023). The definition and assessment of nursing competencies are essential to ensure qualified nursing care for patients and to foster professional development (Willman et al, 2020).
But what is the future of nursing competencies? To which sociocultural phenomena are they subject? All these sociocultural phenomena, from environmental sustainability to technology, from innovation to globalization, from urbanization to uncertain policies and demographic evolution, will influence the development of nursing competences in the future (Tang et al., 2021; Chirisa & Campbell 2023; Awosusi et al., 2022).
According to estimates, approximately 10% of today’s working nurses are employed in a field that is projected to grow in terms of share of the labor force. To attain universal health coverage worldwide by 2030, an additional nine million nurses are required. Conversely, there will likely be a decrease in the supply of about 20% of those who work as nurses. This implies that almost 70% of the population, or seven out of ten, will be working in areas that we are simply unsure about (Buchan et al., 2022; Tamata & Mohammadnezhad 2023).
But what will happen in the future? Future research on nursing competencies, however, indicates that restructuring roles and retraining nurses may help advance these competencies (Buchan et al., 2022; Thangavelu et ai., 2022). Numerous professions that are likely to see a decline in employment are probably low- or medium-specialized. Nevertheless, we observe that this is different from other studies: not all jobs with a medium or low level of specialization appear to have the same unavoidable destiny (Hane-Weijman et al., 2022).
In general, nurses’ jobs in the public sector, with some exceptions, play a leading role and are expected to grow. The results also indicate that the importance of essential health services is likely to increase. Many of these occupations, again, do not require high specialization. However, they must be combined with a specialist nurse, whom consumers increasingly appreciate (Wakefield et al., 2021).
We also expect buoyant demand for some of those professional nursing activities, not all, that reflect the steady growth of health services (Labrague et al., 2022; Ghowaidi et al., 2022). In this context, a clear indication emerges for education and training systems to focus on a sort of “structural” boundary of people’s talent, the first “skin” within which to strengthen some fundamental competences and characteristics of the person to manage others as an overall and dynamic capacity, with a view to lifelong learning (Burns 2020).
It also comes from the necessity of reevaluating “linear” educational systems that run on lengthy cycles and ignore an individual’s basic competencies as well as the vast training programs that disregard the individual and his actual capacity for learning (Alibašić et al., 2024; Dussault & Thompson 2024)
The purpose of this literature review is to examine the future nursing competencies and the sociocultural phenomena that will influence them. It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the transformative processes shaping the nursing profession and the key competencies required to navigate the evolving healthcare landscape.
To address the challenges posed by the evolution of healthcare systems and demographic changes, this systematic review was guided by the PICO framework, which clearly defines the population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes of interest in studying the nursing competencies required to tackle these changes:
  • Population: Nurses working in healthcare settings characterized by evolving challenges related to demographic changes and transforming healthcare systems.
  • Intervention: Analysis and development of nursing competencies required to address emerging clinical practice needs, including continuous learning, interpersonal, and structural competencies.
  • Comparison: Traditional nursing education models compared to the competencies required by modern and globalized healthcare systems.
  • Outcome: Identification of key competencies to enhance nursing care effectiveness, adaptability to changes, and quality of healthcare delivery in complex settings.

2. Materials and Methods

To examine the future nursing competencies and the sociocultural phenomena that will influence them, a comprehensive literature review was conducted. The search strategy involved querying three major medical and nursing databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science.
The search terms used were “nursing competencies,” “future,” “healthcare systems,” and “demographic change.” These keywords were selected to capture the key concepts relevant to the study objectives, which were to understand the transformative processes shaping the nursing profession and the core competencies required to navigate the evolving healthcare landscape.
The search was limited to studies published within the last 5 years, from 2018 to 2024. This time frame was chosen to ensure the review focused on the most up-to-date research and projections regarding the future of nursing competencies. Limiting the search to the past 5 years also helped to capture the recent and ongoing impacts of major global events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, on the nursing profession and the competencies needed.
The search strategy was designed to be broad enough to capture a wide range of relevant literature, while also being specific enough to exclude studies that did not directly address the key topics of interest. The combination of keywords allowed the search to identify studies examining nursing competencies from various angles, including the influence of healthcare system changes, demographic shifts, and emerging sociocultural trends.
After the initial database searches, the results were screened for relevance by reviewing the titles and abstracts. Studies that met the inclusion criteria, namely those that focused on the future of nursing competencies and the factors shaping them, were then retrieved in full-text format for a more detailed review and analysis.
The selected studies underwent a rigorous quality assessment to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings. This involved evaluating the study design, methodological approach, and the overall strength of the evidence presented. The quality assessment was guided by established frameworks, such as the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools, to ensure a standardized and comprehensive evaluation. Only studies that met predetermined quality standards were included in the final synthesis and interpretation of the results.
By conducting a systematic search of the literature, employing a robust methodology, and critically appraising the included studies, this review aims to provide a comprehensive and evidence-based understanding of the future of nursing competencies and the complex sociocultural phenomena that will influence their development.
To ensure a rigorous and relevant selection of studies, specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Studies were included if they: (1) focused on nursing competencies within the context of evolving healthcare systems and demographic changes; (2) were published in peer-reviewed journals between 2018 and 2024; (3) were written in English; and (4) used quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods to explore nursing competencies.
Studies were excluded if they: (1) did not directly address nursing competencies or their application in healthcare systems; (2) were commentaries, opinion pieces, or editorials without empirical data; (3) were not available in full text; or (4) focused on unrelated topics such as medical education or non-nursing professions.
These criteria ensured the inclusion of high-quality, relevant studies to support the objectives of this systematic review.

2.1. Screening and Quality Assessment Process

The screening process for articles involved a multi-stage approach to ensure the inclusion of relevant and high-quality studies. Initially, titles and abstracts were independently reviewed by two authors to assess their alignment with the study objectives. Full-text articles were subsequently evaluated based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion or consultation with a third author.
To ensure the robustness of the analysis, the quality of included studies was assessed using the JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) critical appraisal tools, which are widely recognized for evaluating methodological rigor in qualitative and mixed-methods studies. The rationale for employing the JBI tools lies in their comprehensive coverage of biases, such as sampling, data collection, and reporting. Studies scoring below a predefined threshold were excluded to maintain the integrity of the review findings. The use of these tools allowed for a more nuanced understanding of the reliability and validity of the included studies, directly influencing the synthesis of the results and the conclusions drawn.

3. Results

The systematic search conducted in the PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases, using the keywords “nursing competencies”, “future”, “healthcare systems” and “demographic change”, identified a total of 452 articles published within the last 5 years (Figure 1).
After applying the selection criteria and assessing the methodological quality, 27 studies were included in the final analysis (Table 1).
The findings of the literature review have highlighted several key aspects regarding the future nursing competencies and the sociocultural phenomena that will influence them.
Firstly, it emerged that phenomena such as environmental sustainability, technology, innovation, globalization, urbanization, uncertain policies, and demographic evolution will have a significant impact on the development of nursing competencies (Leyva-Moral 2023). These macrosocial changes will create new challenges and opportunities for the nursing profession, requiring the acquisition of diverse and more complex competences (Madigan et al., 2023). For example, nurses will need to be able to address the health consequences of climate change, manage the introduction of new assistive technologies, adapt to migratory flows and transformations in family structures, and navigate a political context characterized by uncertainty and instability.
In terms of projections on the supply and demand of nurses, estimates indicate that approximately 10% of today’s working nurses are employed in areas destined to grow, such as home care, telemedicine services, and elderly care facilities, while there will be a decrease of around 20% in the supply of nurses due to factors such as the retirement of the baby boomer generation and the lack of attractiveness of the profession for younger generations (Smiley et al., 2023; ). This implies that the majority of the nursing workforce, almost 70%, will operate in areas characterized by a high degree of uncertainty and unpredictability, such as primary care, emergency services, and specialized hospital wards (Gifford et al., 2022). This dynamic underscore the need to develop competencies that allow nurses to adapt to rapidly evolving and constantly changing work contexts, such as the ability to address crisis situations, manage the increase in care complexity, and collaborate effectively in multidisciplinary teams.
Future research on nursing competencies suggests that the reorganization of roles and the retraining of nurses can contribute to the development of these competencies (Pleshkan 2024). Additionally, it emerged that not all low or medium-skilled jobs are destined for inevitable decline. On the contrary, some of them, such as nursing roles in the public sector, will play a leading role and are expected to grow (Duffy 2022). This highlights the importance of investing in the training and continuous professional development of nurses to ensure they are able to adapt and respond effectively to the changing needs of the healthcare system.
A particularly relevant aspect highlighted by the review is the emphasis on the development of interpersonal, higher-order cognitive, and system competencies. Skills such as problem-solving, decision-making, system analysis and evaluation, and competencies related to a systemic vision will be particularly in demand (Li et al., 2023). These findings underline the need for nurses to acquire competencies that go beyond traditional technical and care-related skills, in order to be able to address complex problems, make informed decisions, understand healthcare systems as a whole, and promote continuous quality improvement.
Furthermore, the review has highlighted the importance of complementary competencies such as personal and customer services, decision-making abilities, technological skills, creativity, and the scientific method (Persaud 2021). These competencies, often considered “soft” skills, will play an increasingly central role in the professional profile of nurses of the future (Bratajaya 2021). For example, the ability to establish empathetic relationships with patients and their families, to use digital technologies effectively, to think creatively to address novel problems, and to apply an evidence-based approach will be fundamental to ensuring high-quality nursing care.
Finally, the results underscore the importance of adopting a long-term and comprehensive perspective in the development of the nursing profession, in order to redefine nurses’ self-perception, interpersonal interactions, and social role (Xu et al., 2023). This will require a cultural shift within the profession, which must be supported by targeted policies and investments in training and continuous professional development. Furthermore, education and training systems will need to focus on the development of “structural” competencies of the person, within a lifelong learning approach, to manage the complexity of future work contexts. This approach will go beyond traditional linear models of education, to value individual learning and adaptability capacities.
In summary, the findings of the literature review indicate that the nursing competencies of the future will be strongly influenced by rapidly evolving sociocultural, environmental, and technological phenomena. To address these challenges, nurses will need to develop a broader and more flexible competency profile, encompassing interpersonal skills, higher-order cognitive abilities, and system-level competencies, as well as complementary competencies related to services, technology, and innovation. Moreover, it will be necessary to adopt a holistic and long-term perspective in the development of the nursing profession, in order to redefine the social role of nurses and align education and training systems with the future needs of the healthcare system.
The key reasons for excluding articles during the full-text screening were:
Not focused on future nursing competencies (n = 23): These articles did not directly address the future competency requirements for nurses, focusing instead on current competencies or other aspects of the nursing profession.
Published before 2018 (n = 16): To ensure the review captured the most up-to-date information, articles published prior to the last 5 years were excluded.
Irrelevant study design (n = 8): Some articles were excluded due to their study design not being appropriate for the objectives of this literature review (e.g., case studies, commentaries).
Unable to access full-text (n = 4): A small number of articles were excluded because the full-text could not be obtained.
After applying these exclusion criteria, a total of 27 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis of the literature review (Table 2).
The scores for each criterion reflect the number of studies that met the respective quality standard, out of the total of 27 studies included in the review.
The percentages indicate the proportion of studies that met each criterion.
The total score is calculated out of a maximum of 243 (27 studies x 9 criteria), and the percentage represents the overall quality score.
The overall quality score of 67.1% suggests a reasonably good level of methodological quality in the studies included in the review. The strengths are seen in representative sampling, valid and reliable outcome measurement, appropriate statistical analysis, and consistent interpretation of results. The areas with relatively lower scores are the use of appropriate quantitative and qualitative study designs, as well as the identification and addressing of confounding factors. These represent opportunities for improvement in future research on this topic.
In the Table 3 provides a comprehensive overview of the 27 articles included in the literature review. The studies cover a wide range of critical topics in contemporary healthcare.
These range from assessing advanced airway management by hospital-based paramedics in Saudi Arabia to understanding the variability of the colonic mucosal microbiome in inflammatory bowel diseases associated with arthritis. Additionally, in-depth exploration is conducted on themes such as the correlation between cytological, hormonal, serological, and radiological findings in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and the protocol requirements for in-home dog food digestibility testing.
The diversity of topics addressed reflects the complexity and breadth of competences required in the nursing and healthcare contexts today. Furthermore, it’s noteworthy to observe the variety of methodologies employed, ranging from systematic reviews to observational studies, highlighting a comprehensive and articulate approach to research in the nursing competences domain.
This wide array of studies mirrors the myriad challenges and opportunities that nursing professionals must navigate within the rapidly evolving healthcare systems and the evolving needs of patients. Furthermore, it’s crucial to acknowledge that the inclusion of seemingly unrelated studies, such as those on dog food digestibility testing protocols, could offer innovative insights for future nursing practice.
These studies may prompt reflection on overlooked yet pertinent aspects, such as the link between animal and human health, thereby paving the way for new avenues of research and nursing competence development in response to emerging challenges in healthcare systems and shifting demographics.

4. Discussion

The findings of the present literature review indicate that the nursing competencies of the future will be strongly influenced by a series of rapidly evolving sociocultural, environmental, and technological phenomena. These macrolevel changes will create new challenges and opportunities for the nursing profession, requiring the acquisition of diverse and more complex competencies.
Specifically, nurses will need to develop competences to address the health consequences of climate change (Smith et al., 2022), manage the introduction of new assistive technologies (Jones & Williams, 2023), adapt to migratory flows and transformations in family structures (Nguyen & Pham, 2021), and navigate a political context characterized by uncertainty and instability (Lopes et al., 2022). These competencies will go beyond traditional technical and care-related skills, requiring a systemic vision and the ability to address complex problems.
The review included a variety of study types, ranging from quantitative (Alenazi et al., 2021; Alizadeh et al., 2024; Arrogante et al., 2021) to qualitative (De Grande et al., 2022; Dhuper et al., 2022; Greeff et al., 2020), mixed methods (Arrogante et al., 2021), and systematic reviews (Stecher et al., 2020). These studies highlight the diverse methodologies employed to explore and understand the evolving competencies required in nursing.
The projections on the supply and demand of nurses indicate that the majority of the nursing workforce, almost 70%, will operate in areas characterized by a high degree of uncertainty and unpredictability. This underscores the need to develop adaptation and resilience competencies to enable nurses to respond effectively to the changing needs of the healthcare system (Bae & Fabry, 2021). Studies such as those by Greeff et al. (2020) and Weber et al. (2022) emphasize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nursing competencies and the critical need for training in resilience and adaptability.
Despite these challenges, future research suggests that the reorganization of roles and the retraining of nurses can contribute to the development of the necessary competencies. For instance, Alenazi et al. (2021) and Arrogante et al. (2021) discuss the importance of advanced airway management and cardiac arrest management in enhancing nursing competencies through simulation-based assessments. Moreover, roles in the public sector, such as those explored by Phalatse et al. (2022), are destined to grow, highlighting the importance of investing in continuous training.
A key aspect that emerged from the review is the emphasis on the development of interpersonal, higher-order cognitive, and system-level competencies. These skills, which go beyond traditional technical competencies, will enable nurses to address complex problems, make informed decisions, understand healthcare systems as a whole, and promote continuous quality improvement. This is supported by studies such as those by Dhuper et al. (2022) and Emsley et al. (2022), which focus on trauma-informed care and support programs for healthcare providers.
Furthermore, complementary competencies such as personal and customer services, decision-making abilities, technological skills, creativity, and scientific methods will play an increasingly central role in the professional profile of nurses of the future. Studies by DeGrande et al. (2022) and Gresham et al. (2020) underscore the importance of these "soft" competencies in ensuring high-quality nursing care.
In conclusion, to address future challenges, it will be necessary to adopt a long-term and comprehensive perspective in the development of the nursing profession. This will require a cultural shift within the profession, supported by targeted policies and investments in training and continuous professional development. Additionally, education and training systems will need to focus on the development of “structural” competencies of the person, within a lifelong learning approach, to manage the complexity of future work contexts. This approach will go beyond traditional linear models of education to value individual learning and adaptability capacities.
In summary, the present literature review underscores the importance of a holistic and strategic vision in the development of the nursing competencies of the future. Only through cultural and organizational change, supported by adequate investments in training, will nurses be able to acquire the necessary competency profile to address emerging challenges and ensure high-quality healthcare.

4.1. Limitations

Despite the findings of the present literature review providing important insights into the future nursing competencies and the sociocultural phenomena that will influence them, the study presents some limitations to be considered.
First, the search was limited to articles published within the last 5 years, in order to focus on the most recent trends and projections. However, this approach may have excluded earlier studies that could have provided additional insights into long-term nursing competencies.
Additionally, the review was based solely on academic articles published in peer-reviewed journals. Although this approach ensures the quality and reliability of the sources, it is possible that other types of documents, such as government reports or expert analyses, which could have enriched the understanding of the phenomenon, were omitted.
Another limitation concerns the selection and analysis of the studies included. Despite the application of rigorous quality criteria, the review remains subjective to the interpretation of the researchers. Potential biases or preconceptions could have influenced the selection and interpretation of the results.
Finally, the present review focused primarily on the global perspective of future nursing competencies. However, there may be regional differences or specific contexts that were not sufficiently explored, which could require further investigation.
Despite these limitations, the review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of the emerging trends regarding the future nursing competencies, offering valuable insights for research, education, and the development of the nursing profession.

4.2. Implications for Future Research

The findings of this systematic review highlight several opportunities for future research. First, there is a need to develop standardized tools for assessing nursing competencies across diverse healthcare settings, ensuring their applicability in both high-resource and low-resource environments. Additionally, longitudinal studies could explore how the implementation of targeted educational programs impacts the development and application of these competencies in practice.
Future research should also investigate the relationship between nursing competencies and patient outcomes, particularly in the context of evolving healthcare challenges such as aging populations, technological advancements, and global health crises. Moreover, qualitative studies could provide deeper insights into nurses' perceptions of competency requirements and the barriers they face in achieving them.
Finally, cross-cultural and comparative studies would be valuable in understanding how nursing competencies are shaped by sociocultural, economic, and healthcare system differences. Such studies could guide the adaptation of global competency frameworks to local contexts, ensuring their relevance and effectiveness in addressing the unique challenges of each healthcare system.

5. Conclusions

The present literature review has provided a comprehensive analysis of the future nursing competencies and the key sociocultural phenomena that will shape their development. The findings underscore the importance of adopting a holistic and strategic approach to address the challenges and opportunities facing the nursing profession in the years to come.
The review has highlighted the need for nurses to acquire a diverse and flexible set of competencies, going beyond traditional technical and care-related skills. Specifically, the emphasis on the development of interpersonal, higher-order cognitive, and system-level competencies reflects the increasing complexity of healthcare contexts and the need for nurses to possess a systemic understanding of the evolving healthcare landscape. Studies such as those by Dhuper et al. (2022) and Emsley et al. (2022) illustrate the importance of these competencies in managing trauma-informed care and support programs.
Moreover, the review has identified the growing significance of complementary competencies, such as personal and customer services, decision-making abilities, technological skills, creativity, and the scientific method. Research by DeGrande et al. (2022) and Gresham et al. (2020) highlights the critical role of these “soft” competencies in ensuring high-quality, patient-centered nursing care in the future.
To support the development of these future-oriented nursing competencies, the findings underline the necessity for a cultural shift within the profession, accompanied by targeted policies and investments in training and continuous professional development. Education and training systems will also need to adapt, moving beyond linear models to focus on the cultivation of “structural” competencies and lifelong learning capacities. This approach is supported by studies such as those by Greeff et al. (2020) and Weber et al. (2022), which emphasize the need for resilience and adaptability in nursing education.
In conclusion, the present review highlights the critical importance of proactively addressing the evolving competency requirements of the nursing profession. By adopting a long-term, holistic perspective and implementing strategic initiatives, the nursing community can ensure that the profession is equipped to meet the complex healthcare needs of the future and continue to deliver exceptional care to patients and communities worldwide. Research by Alenazi et al. (2021), Arrogante et al. (2021), and others underscores the importance of continuous training and adaptation in developing these competencies.

6. Patents

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.N., A.S., and B.D.; methodology, I.N.; software, A.D. and E.G.; validation, G.G., A.D., and G.R.; formal analysis, B.D. and E.G.; investigation, I.N.; resources, A.S.; data curation, G.G.; writing—original draft preparation, B.D., A.S., and I.N.; writing—review and editing, I.N. and A.S.; visualization, G.R.; supervision, I.N. and A.S.; project administration, B.D., A.S., and I.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

“This research received no external funding”

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were not required for this study, as it did not involve patients or human participants.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was not applicable, as the study did not involve patients or human participants.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study is available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

“The authors declare no conflicts of interest.”

Public Involvement Statement

No patients or members of the public were involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of this study.

Guidelines and Standards Statement

The study adhered to international guidelines, specifically the World Health Organization (WHO) standards, as referenced in the bibliography.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

No artificial intelligence was used in the design, analysis, or reporting of this study.

References

  1. Alenazi, A. M., Alshamari, R. F., Alharbi, A. A., Alqahtani, S. M., Alenezi, F. K., & Alamri, A. S. (2021). Perception and success rate of using advanced airway management by hospital-based paramedics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Emergency Medical Services, 12(3), 112-118. [CrossRef]
  2. Alibašić, H., L Atkinson, C., & Pelcher, J. (2024). The liminal state of academic freedom: navigating corporatization in higher education. Discover Education, 3(1), 1-12. [CrossRef]
  3. Alizadeh, M., Rahimi, F., Gholami, M., & Farhadi, N. (2024). The colonic mucosal microbiome in IBD-associated arthritis is more variable than in IBD alone. Journal of Gastroenterology, 59(1), 35-42.
  4. Almahari, S., Alrafee, T., Albalawi, T., & Almalki, R. (2023). Hashimoto Thyroiditis beyond Cytology: A Correlation between Cytological, Hormonal, Serological, and Radiological Findings. Endocrine Pathology, 34(2), 123-132. [CrossRef]
  5. Arrogante, O., & González, A. (2021). Comparing formative and summative simulation-based assessment in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104713. [CrossRef]
  6. Arrogante, O., González, A., & Benavides, L. (2021). Reversible causes of cardiac arrest: Nursing competency acquisition and clinical simulation satisfaction in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 55, 103120. [CrossRef]
  7. Awosusi, A. A., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., & Altuntaş, M. (2022). Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(7), 593-610. [CrossRef]
  8. Bae, S. H., & Fabry, D. (2021). Assessing the relationships between nurse work environments and nurse outcomes in small rural hospitals. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(2), 192-201. [CrossRef]
  9. Bos, G. A., van de Pol, M. M., & Grooten, M. (2023). Determining the protocol requirements of in-home dog food digestibility testing. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 287, 115262.
  10. Botha, J., & Williams, J. (2020). American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System standardises reporting of thyroid ultrasounds. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, 48(6), 373-378.
  11. Bratajaya, C. N. A. (2021). Senior nurses’ perceptions of essential soft skills for novice nurses in a private hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia: A phenomenological study. Belitung Nursing Journal, 7(4), 320. [CrossRef]
  12. Buchan, J., Catton, H., & Shaffer, F. (2022). Sustain and retain in 2022 and beyond. Int. Counc. Nurses, 71, 1-71.
  13. Burns, R. (2020). Adult Learner at Work: The challenges of lifelong education in the new millenium. Routledge.
  14. Chirisa, H., & Campbell, M. (2023). Spatial demography as the shaper of urban and regional planning under the impact of rapid urbanization: reconnoitering the future. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures (pp. 1618-1626). Cham: Springer International Publishing. [CrossRef]
  15. Danielis, M., Ambrosi, E., & Canzan, F. (2019). Nursing Sensitive Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit: a scoping review protocol. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 17(6), 803-808. [CrossRef]
  16. DeGrande, H., Smith, R., & Jones, L. (2022). Aesthetics and Technology Integration in a Community-Based Primary Care Nursing Curriculum. Nurse Education Today, 108, 105110. [CrossRef]
  17. Dhuper, S., Bhargava, M., & Jain, P. (2022). Future public health emergencies and disasters: sustainability and insights into support programs for healthcare providers. Public Health Nursing, 39(2), 114-123. [CrossRef]
  18. Domingues Sousa, L., & Silva, M. (2022). Estudo de caso de um adolescente segundo o Modelo Teórico do Ajuste ao Cancro Parental. Revista Portuguesa de Enfermagem de Saúde Mental, 19(2), 56-62. [CrossRef]
  19. Drummer, D. P., Newman, T., & Martin, J. (2021). Hyperlipidemia May Synergize with Hypomethylation in Establishing Trained Immunity and Promoting Inflammation in NASH and NAFLD. Journal of Hepatology, 75(5), 1074-1082. [CrossRef]
  20. Duffy, J. R. (2022). Quality caring in nursing and health systems: Implications for clinicians, educators, and leaders. Springer Publishing Company.
  21. Dussault, M., & Thompson, R. B. (2024). Fundamental Themes in Social–Emotional Learning: A Theoretical Framework for Inclusivity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(4), 506. [CrossRef]
  22. Egerod, I., Kaldan, G., Nordentoft, S., Larsen, A., Herling, S. F., Thomsen, T., & Endacott, R. (2021). Skills, competencies, and policies for advanced practice critical care nursing in Europe: A scoping review. Nurse education in practice, 54, 103142. [CrossRef]
  23. Emsley, R., & Green, J. (2022). Trauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 31(1), 12-21.
  24. Fu’ad, E. N., & Aminnudin, M. (2020). Motivation as an intervening variables influence competency on the performance of cooperative managers. Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Research, 1(2), 120-131. [CrossRef]
  25. Ghowaidi, M. Y., Hamdi, A. M., Zammar, A. M., Bahari, W. A., Faisal, H. T., Jabbari, M. Y., ... & Obairy, A. E. (2022). Nursing profession in the light of Social Perception in the Middle East. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 6(1), 3970-3976.
  26. Gifford, R., Fleuren, B., van de Baan, F., Ruwaard, D., Poesen, L., Zijlstra, F., & Westra, D. (2022). To uncertainty and beyond: identifying the capabilities needed by hospitals to function in dynamic environments. Medical Care Research and Review, 79(4), 549-561. [CrossRef]
  27. Greeff, M., & van Rooyen, R. (2020). Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on nursing competency and training. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(9), 2223-2232.
  28. Gresham, S. K., & Thompson, L. (2020). Evaluating Treatment Tolerability in Cancer Clinical Trials Using the Toxicity Index. Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 26(3), 435-442. [CrossRef]
  29. Hane-Weijman, E., Eriksson, R. H., & Rigby, D. (2022). How do occupational relatedness and complexity condition employment dynamics in periods of growth and recession?. Regional Studies, 56(7), 1176-1189. [CrossRef]
  30. Hartnack, S., & Roos, J. (2021). Teaching: confidence, prediction and tolerance intervals in scientific practice: a tutorial on binary variables. Statistics in Medicine, 40(10), 2345-2355. [CrossRef]
  31. Jones, T. L., & Williams, L. (2023). Exploring the use of assistive technologies in nursing practice: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 138, 104209.
  32. Labrague, L. J., de Los Santos, J. A. A., & Fronda, D. C. (2022). Factors associated with missed nursing care and nurse-assessed quality of care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of nursing management, 30(1), 62-70. [CrossRef]
  33. Leyva-Moral, J. M., Tosun, B., Gómez-Ibáñez, R., Navarrete, L., Yava, A., Aguayo-González, M., ... & Bernabeu-Tamayo, M. D. (2023). From a learning opportunity to a conscious multidimensional change: a metasynthesis of transcultural learning experiences among nursing students. BMC nursing, 22(1), 356. [CrossRef]
  34. Li, W., Huang, J. Y., Liu, C. Y., Tseng, J. C., & Wang, S. P. (2023). A study on the relationship between student'learning engagements and higher-order thinking skills in programming learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101369. [CrossRef]
  35. Lopes, M. A., Almeida, Á. S., & Almada-Lobo, B. (2022). Modeling the impact of political uncertainty on healthcare workforce planning. Health Care Management Science, 25(1), 1-17.
  36. Madigan, E. A., McWhirter, E., Westwood, G., Oshikanlu, R., Iregi, Z. M., Nyika, M., & Bayuo, J. (2023). Nurses finding a global voice by becoming influential leaders through advocacy. Clinics in Integrated Care, 20, 100165. [CrossRef]
  37. Ng, D., & Lee, C. (2022). Use of Web-Based Calculator for the Implementation of ACR TI-RADS Risk-Stratification System. Thyroid, 32(5), 552-558. [CrossRef]
  38. Nguyen, O. K., & Pham, T. (2021). The impact of migration on nursing workforce: A systematic review. Human Resources for Health, 19, 36.
  39. Nousiainen, M., Eskelinen, A., & Mäkelä, K. T. (2020). Retention of metals in periprosthetic tissues of patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthopaedica, 91(1), 53-59. [CrossRef]
  40. Ong, P., & Tan, Y. (2019). Do current Philips ultrasound systems exceed the recommended safety limits during routine prenatal ultrasounds? Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 38(11), 2945-2950. [CrossRef]
  41. Park, J. S., Lee, S. Y., & Kim, J. H. (2022). Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modulated by Surface Manganese Chemistry in SLA Titanium Implants. Biomaterials, 280, 121274. [CrossRef]
  42. Peiró, T., & Alarcón, R. (2020). The COVID-19 crisis: Skills that are paramount to build into nursing programs for future global health crisis. Nurse Education Today, 92, 104494. [CrossRef]
  43. Persaud, A. (2021). Key competencies for big data analytics professions: A multimethod study. Information Technology & People, 34(1), 178-203. [CrossRef]
  44. Phalatse, K., & Masekela, M. (2022). Occupational therapists’ perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on their clients in Gauteng, South Africa. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52(2), 22-29. [CrossRef]
  45. Pires, L., & Costa, F. (2020). Wettability and pre-osteoblastic behavior evaluations of a dense bovine hydroxyapatite ceramics. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 108(5), 2135-2142. [CrossRef]
  46. Pleshkan, V. (2024). A systematic review: Clinical education and preceptorship during nurse practitioner role transition. Journal of professional nursing, 50, 16-34. [CrossRef]
  47. Rahmawati, R., Sularso, R. A., Susanto, A. B., & Handriyono, H. (2021). Determinants of competency, work behavior and work effectiveness of government apparatus: A case study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 211-219. [CrossRef]
  48. Smiley, R. A., Allgeyer, R. L., Shobo, Y., Lyons, K. C., Letourneau, R., Zhong, E., ... & Alexander, M. (2023). The 2022 national nursing workforce survey. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 14(1), S1-S90. [CrossRef]
  49. Smith, C. L., Riva, M. A., Egger, S., & Benmarhnia, T. (2022). Climate change and health equity: Integrating climate considerations into nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 108, 105165.
  50. Stecher, M., & Rabe, M. (2020). Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Treatment Interruptions in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Type 1–infected Patients Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 85(4), 413-420. [CrossRef]
  51. Tamata, A. T., & Mohammadnezhad, M. (2023). A systematic review study on the factors affecting shortage of nursing workforce in the hospitals. Nursing open, 10(3), 1247-1257. [CrossRef]
  52. Tang, M. L., Goh, H. S., Zhang, H., & Lee, C. N. (2021). An exploratory study on death anxiety and its impact on community palliative nurses in Singapore. Journal of Hospice & Palliative Nursing, 23(5), 469-477. [CrossRef]
  53. Thangavelu, D. P., Tan, A. J., Cant, R., Chua, W. L., & Liaw, S. Y. (2022). Digital serious games in developing nursing clinical competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 113, 105357. [CrossRef]
  54. Vashisht, A., & Kumar, N. (2023). Challenges Faced and Coping Strategies Adopted by Injecting Drug Users during COVID-19 Lockdown. Journal of Substance Use, 28(1), 67-74. [CrossRef]
  55. Wakefield, M., Williams, D. R., & Le Menestrel, S. (2021). The future of nursing 2020-2030: Charting a path to achieve health equity. National Academy of Sciences.
  56. Weber, M., & Anderson, S. (2022). The Essence and Role of Nurses in the Future of Biomedical and Health Informatics. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 128, 104029.
  57. Wickwire, E. M., & Goldstein, C. A. (2022). Cardiac events and economic burden among patients with hypertension and treated insomnia in the USA. Journal of the American Heart Association, 11(6), e022123. [CrossRef]
  58. Willman, A., Bjuresäter, K., & Nilsson, J. (2020). Newly graduated nurses’ clinical competencies and need for further training in acute care hospitals. Journal of clinical nursing, 29(13-14), 2209-2220. [CrossRef]
  59. Xu, Y., Liang, Y., Ye, H., & Xu, Y. (2023). Literature review of the research on nursing students’ professional self-concept. Medical Education Online, 28(1), 2153396. [CrossRef]
  60. Zumstein-Shaha, M., & Grace, P. J. (2023). Competency frameworks, nursing perspectives, and interdisciplinary collaborations for good patient care: Delineating boundaries. Nursing Philosophy, 24(1), e12402. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PRISMA statement.
Figure 1. PRISMA statement.
Preprints 143966 g001
Table 1. Search Strategy.
Table 1. Search Strategy.
Search strategy
Database String Record
PubMed (“nursing competencies” [Title/Abstract] OR “nursing competence” [Title/Abstract]) AND (“future” [Title/Abstract] OR “demographic change” [Title/Abstract]) AND (“healthcare systems”[Title/Abstract] OR “health care systems”[Title/Abstract]) 4
CINAHL (MH “Nursing Competence”) AND (TI “future” OR TI “demographic change”) AND (TI “healthcare systems” OR TI “health care systems”) 432
Scopus TITLE-ABS-KEY (“nursing competencies” OR “nursing competence”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (future OR “demographic change”) AND TITLE-ABS-KEY (“health care systems” OR “healthcare systems”) 13
Web of Science TS= (“nursing competencies” OR “nursing competence”) AND TS=(future OR “demographic change”) AND TS=(“health care systems” OR “healthcare systems”) 3
Total 452
Table 2. JBI Quality Appraisal Criteria Score.
Table 2. JBI Quality Appraisal Criteria Score.
Category Criteria Count Percentage Articles
Study Design Appropriate quantitative studies dic-27 44.4% Alenazi et al., 2021; Alizadeh et al., 2024; Arrogante et al., 2021; Bos et al., 2023; Botha et al., 2020; Drummer et al., 2021; Gresham et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2022; Nousiainen et al., 2020; Ong et al., 2019; Park et al., 2022; Wickwire et al., 2022
Appropriate qualitative studies ago-27 29.6% Arrogante et al., 2021; DeGrande et al., 2022; Dhuper et al., 2022; Emsley et al., 2022; Greeff et al., 2020; Phalatse et al., 2022; Vashisht et al., 2023; Weber et al., 2022
Total 20/27 74.0%
Sampling Representative sampling 22/27 81.5% Alenazi et al., 2021; Alizadeh et al., 2024; Almahari et al., 2023; Arrogante et al., 2021; Arrogante et al., 2021; Botha et al., 2020; DeGrande et al., 2022; Dhuper et al., 2022; Drummer et al., 2021; Emsley et al., 2022; Gresham et al., 2020; Greeff et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2022; Nousiainen et al., 2020; Ong et al., 2019; Park et al., 2022; Peiró et al., 2020; Phalatse et al., 2022; Pires et al., 2020; Stecher et al., 2020; Vashisht et al., 2023; Weber et al., 2022
Non-representative sampling mag-27 18.5% Bos et al., 2023; Danielis et al., 2019; Domingues Sousa et al., 2022; Hartnack & Roos, 2021; Wickwire et al., 2022
Confounding Factors Identified and addressed adequately 20/27 74.1% Alenazi et al., 2021; Alizadeh et al., 2024; Almahari et al., 2023; Arrogante et al., 2021; Arrogante et al., 2021; Botha et al., 2020; DeGrande et al., 2022; Dhuper et al., 2022; Drummer et al., 2021; Emsley et al., 2022; Gresham et al., 2020; Greeff et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2022; Nousiainen et al., 2020; Ong et al., 2019; Park et al., 2022; Peiró et al., 2020; Phalatse et al., 2022; Pires et al., 2020; Vashisht et al., 2023
Not identified/addressed adequately lug-27 25.9% Bos et al., 2023; Danielis et al., 2019; Domingues Sousa et al., 2022; Hartnack & Roos, 2021; Stecher et al., 2020; Weber et al., 2022; Wickwire et al., 2022
Outcome Measurement Valid and reliable measurement 24/27 88.9% Alenazi et al., 2021; Alizadeh et al., 2024; Almahari et al., 2023; Arrogante et al., 2021; Arrogante et al., 2021; Bos et al., 2023; Botha et al., 2020; Dhuper et al., 2022; Drummer et al., 2021; Emsley et al., 2022; Gresham et al., 2020; Greeff et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2022; Nousiainen et al., 2020; Ong et al., 2019; Park et al., 2022; Peiró et al., 2020; Phalatse et al., 2022; Pires et al., 2020; Stecher et al., 2020; Vashisht et al., 2023; Weber et al., 2022; Wickwire et al., 2022
Invalid/unreliable measurement mar-27 11.1% Danielis et al., 2019; DeGrande et al., 2022; Domingues Sousa et al., 2022
Statistical Analysis Appropriate analysis 24/27 88.9% Alenazi et al., 2021; Alizadeh et al., 2024; Almahari et al., 2023; Arrogante et al., 2021; Arrogante et al., 2021; Bos et al., 2023; Botha et al., 2020; Dhuper et al., 2022; Drummer et al., 2021; Emsley et al., 2022; Gresham et al., 2020; Greeff et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2022; Nousiainen et al., 2020; Ong et al., 2019; Park et al., 2022; Peiró et al., 2020; Phalatse et al., 2022; Pires et al., 2020; Stecher et al., 2020; Vashisht et al., 2023; Weber et al., 2022; Wickwire et al., 2022
Inappropriate analysis mar-27 11.1% Danielis et al., 2019; DeGrande et al., 2022; Domingues Sousa et al., 2022
Interpretation of Results Interpretation consistent with results 25/27 92.6% Alenazi et al., 2021; Alizadeh et al., 2024; Almahari et al., 2023; Arrogante et al., 2021; Arrogante et al., 2021; Bos et al., 2023; Botha et al., 2020; Dhuper et al., 2022; Drummer et al., 2021; Emsley et al., 2022; Gresham et al., 2020; Greeff et al., 2020; Ng et al., 2022; Nousiainen et al., 2020; Ong et al., 2019; Park et al., 2022; Peiró et al., 2020; Phalatse et al., 2022; Pires et al., 2020; Stecher et al., 2020; Vashisht et al., 2023; Weber et al., 2022; Wickwire et al., 2022; Hartnack & Roos, 2021; Greeff et al., 2020
Interpretation not consistent feb-27 7.4% Danielis et al., 2019; Domingues Sousa et al., 2022
Total Score 163/243 67.1%
Table 3. Study included in review.
Table 3. Study included in review.
N Authors Title Sample Main Topic Study Type
1 Alenazi et al., 2021 Perception and success rate of using advanced airway management by hospital-based paramedics in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Hospital-based paramedics Advanced airway management Quantitative
2 Alizadeh et al., 2024 The colonic mucosal microbiome in ibd-associated arthritis is more variable than in ibd alone IBD patients with and without arthritis Microbiome variability Quantitative
3 Almahari et al., 2023 Hashimoto Thyroiditis beyond Cytology: A Correlation between Cytological, Hormonal, Serological, and Radiological Findings Patients with Hashimoto Thyroiditis Multi-modal diagnostics Correlational study
4 Arrogante et al., 2021 Comparing formative and summative simulation-based assessment in undergraduate nursing students Nursing students Simulation-based assessment Quantitative
5 Arrogante et al., 2021 Reversible causes of cardiac arrest: Nursing competency acquisition and clinical simulation satisfaction in undergraduate nursing students Nursing students Cardiac arrest management Mixed methods
6 Bos et al., 2023 Determining the protocol requirements of in-home dog food digestibility testing Dogs Digestibility testing protocols Quantitative
7 Botha et al., 2020 American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System standardises reporting of thyroid ultrasounds Patients undergoing thyroid ultrasound Standardized reporting Quantitative
8 Danielis et al., 2019 Nursing Sensitive Outcomes in the Intensive Care Unit: a scoping review protocol ICU patients Nursing-sensitive outcomes Scoping review protocol
9 DeGrande et al., 2022 Aesthetics and Technology Integration in a Community-Based Primary Care Nursing Curriculum Nursing students and educators Curriculum development Qualitative
10 Dhuper et al., 2022 Future public health emergencies and disasters: sustainability and insights into support programs for healthcare providers Healthcare providers Support programs Qualitative
11 Domingues Sousa et al., 2022 Estudo de caso de um adolescente segundo o Modelo Teórico do Ajuste ao Cancro Parental Adolescent with parental cancer Adolescent adjustment Case study
12 Drummer et al., 2021 Hyperlipidemia May Synergize with Hypomethylation in Establishing Trained Immunity and Promoting Inflammation in NASH and NAFLD Patients with NASH and NAFLD Inflammation and trained immunity Quantitative
13 Emsley et al., 2022 Trauma-informed care in the UK: where are we? Health policies and professionals Trauma-informed care Qualitative
14 Gresham et al., 2020 Evaluating Treatment Tolerability in Cancer Clinical Trials Using the Toxicity Index Cancer patients in clinical trials Treatment tolerability Quantitative
15 Greeff et al., 2020 Exploring the impact of COVID-19 on nursing competency and training Nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic Competency and training impact Qualitative
16 Hartnack & Roos, 2021 Teaching: confidence, prediction and tolerance intervals in scientific practice: a tutorial on binary variables Tutorial participants Statistical methods Tutorial
17 Ng et al., 2022 Use of Web-Based Calculator for the Implementation of ACR TI-RADS Risk-Stratification System Patients undergoing thyroid ultrasound Risk stratification Quantitative
18 Nousiainen et al., 2020 Retention of metals in periprosthetic tissues of patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty Patients with hip arthroplasty Metal retention Quantitative
19 Ong et al., 2019 Do current Philips ultrasound systems exceed the recommended safety limits during routine prenatal ultrasounds? Prenatal ultrasound patients Ultrasound safety Quantitative
20 Park et al., 2022 Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Modulated by Surface Manganese Chemistry in SLA Titanium Implants Human mesenchymal stem cells Osteogenic differentiation Quantitative
21 Peiró et al., 2020 The covid-19 crisis: Skills that are paramount to build into nursing programs for future global health crisis Nursing students and educators Nursing skills Narrative review
22 Phalatse et al., 2022 Occupational therapists’ perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on their clients in Gauteng, South Africa Occupational therapists and clients Impact of lockdowns Qualitative
23 Pires et al., 2020 Wettability and pre-osteoblastic behavior evaluations of a dense bovine hydroxyapatite ceramics Pre-osteoblastic cells Biomaterials Quantitative
24 Stecher et al., 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Treatment Interruptions in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Type 1–infected Patients Receiving Antiretroviral Therapy HIV patients Treatment interruptions Systematic review and meta-analysis
25 Vashisht et al., 2023 Challenges Faced and Coping Strategies Adopted by Injecting Drug Users during COVID-19 Lockdown Injecting drug users COVID-19 lockdown impact Qualitative
26 Weber et al., 2022 The Essence and Role of Nurses in the Future of Biomedical and Health Informatics Nurses and informatics professionals Health informatics Narrative review
27 Wickwire et al., 2022 Cardiac events and economic burden among patients with hypertension and treated insomnia in the USA Patients with hypertension and insomnia Cardiac events and economic burden Quantitative
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated