Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Phage vB_KlebPS_265 Active Against Resistant/MDR and Hypermucoid K2 Strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

16 December 2024

Posted:

17 December 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important opportunistic pathogen often resistant to antibiotics. Specif-ic phages can be useful in eliminating infection caused by K pneumoniae. Klebsiella phage vB_KlebPS_265 (KlebP_265) and its host strain were isolated from the sputum of a patient with Klebsiella infection. KlebP_265 was specific mainly to K. pneumoniae type K2 strains including hypermucoid strains. Most of the hypermucoid KlebP_265-susceptible strains were antibiotic-resistant. This siphophage demonstrated good lytic activity and stability. The KlebP_265 genome was 46,962 bp and contained 88 putative genes; functions were predicted for 37 of them. No genes encoding integrases, toxins, or antibiotic resistance were found in the genome. So, KlebP_265 could potentially be a therapeutic phage. Comparative analysis indicated that KlebP_265 with the most relative Klebsiella phage DP01 formed the putative Dipiunovirus genus. Genome analysis revealed a large monophyletic group of phages related to KlebP_265 and DP01. This group is divided into two monophyletic clusters of phages forming new putative subfamilies Skatevirinae and Roufvirinae. Phylogenetic analysis showed extensive gene exchange between phages from the putative subfamilies. Horizontal transfer even involved conservative genes and led to clear genomic mosaicism, indicating multiple recombination events in the an-cestral phages during evolution.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The genus Klebsiella contains Gram-negative, encapsulated, immobile, and oxidase-negative rods and belongs to the Enterobacteriaceae family [1]. This genus is phylogenetically closely related to the genus Raoultella and they both form a group called the "Klebsiella clade" [2]. To date, this group includes 22 species (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/klebsiella; https://bacterio.net/genus/raoultella, accessed on September 25, 2024). The type species of the Klebsiella genus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, is a common opportunistic pathogen included into the ESCAPE group. K. pneumoniae can cause a variety of hospital-acquired infections, namely pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and bacteremia in immunocompromised patients or those who have frequent contacts with the healthcare system [3]. The World Health Organization has identified Klebsiella strains that have developed resistance to various classes of antibiotics, including multiple drug-resistant (MDR) strains and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella (CRK), as a "critical concern" [4].
K. pneumoniae strains are divided into two pathotypes, classical and hypervirulent. Classical strains of K. pneumoniae (cKP) are known for the ability to accumulate mutations and acquire genetic determinants leading to the emergence of MDR clones. More than 100 genes of acquired antimicrobial resistance have been identified in K. pneumoniae, which encode various products that confer resistance to different classes of antibiotics, including β-lactams, aminoglycosides, quinolones and polymyxins [5]. Hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKp) is more virulent than cKP and can cause severe community-acquired and hospital-acquired infections associated with high pathogenicity and mortality in both immunocompromised and healthy humans [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Initially, hvKp was recognized as a cause of pyogenic liver abscesses in Asia and was identified as an invasive type of K. pneumoniae with a tendency to metastatic spread to remote sites, mainly to the eyes, lungs, and central nervous system [6,12]. In addition, severe skin, soft tissue, and bone infections caused by hvKp have been reported [7,13,14,15]. The hvKp infections are diverse and distinct from infections caused by cKp. A distinctive feature of most hvKp isolates is the hypermucoid phenotype on agar plates. So, hvKp has alternatively been called hypermucoid K. pneumoniae to distinguish it from cKp. The ‘string test’ was developed as a phenotypic test for hypermucoviscosity; when a colony can be stretched by at least five millimeters using an inoculation loop, the isolate is considered hypermucoid and therefore hvKp [16]. Most of the reported hvKp clones belong to serotypes K1 and K2; however, hvKp has also been documented among K5, K16, K54, and K57 serotypes [10]. Most of the previously described hvKp isolates were sensitive to antibiotics. However, hvKp strains are now becoming highly antibiotic-resistant, and thus, the clinical landscape of hvKp is changing drastically [11].
One of the promising approaches to eliminating MDR hvKp infections is the use of phages or phage-derived products. To date, more than 1300 bacteriophages infecting bacteria from the Klebsiella/Raoultella group are known (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore, accessed on September 25, 2024). The vast majority of the studied phages infect K. pneumoniae strains, and only a few phages have been identified whose host strains belong to other Klebsiella/Raoultella species. All Klebsiella phages are members of the Caudoviricetes class, which contains tailed phages with dsDNA genomes. A wide variety of taxonomic groups can be found among Klebsiella phages, including 9 families, 14 subfamilies, and 55 genera. Klebsiella phages of three morphotypes of tailed phages were registered, namely siphovirus (e.g. Casjensviridae, Demerecviridae, Drexlerviridae, Guernseyvirinae, Queuovirinae), myovirus (Ackermannviridae, Peduoviridae, Straboviridae, Stephanstirmvirinae, Vequintavirinae, Jedunavirus), and podovirus morphotype (Autographiviridae, Schitoviridae) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy, accessed on September 25, 2024). However, more than 300 of newly isolated Klebsiella phages with undetermined systematic position can be found in the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore, accessed on September 25, 2024).
In this study, a novel Klebsiella phage vB_KlebPS_265 (hereinafter KlebP_265) was isolated and characterized. Based on its biological properties and the content of its genome, this phage can be suggested as a potentially therapeutic agent. Comparative analysis of the KlebP_265 genome allowed us to propose a new family "Skateroufviridae", which contains two putative subfamilies - "Skatevirinae" and "Roufvirinae"; the last includes KlebP_265 as a member of a new genus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain Identification

K. pneumoniae isolate was obtained from a sample of human sputum. Ten-fold dilutions of the sample were prepared in sterile phosphate-saline buffer (PBS, pH 7.5), and 100 µL aliquots of cell suspensions were spread on MacConkey agar (Сondalab, Madrid, Spain) to differentiate Enterobacteriaceae species. Bacterial colonies of interest were transferred to Nutrient agar (NA, Microgen, Obolensk, Russia) and spread to obtain individual colonies. One colony was spread on a new NA plate and this procedure was repeated three times to obtain pure culture. Sequencing of a 1300 bp fragment of the 16S rRNA gene was performed to confirm bacterial species. Primers 16s-8-f-B 5'-AGRGTTTGATCCTGGCTCA-3' and 16s-1350-r-B 5'-GACGGGGGGCGGTGTGTGTGTGTACAAG-3' were used for PCR and sequencing, as described previously [17]. Sequencing reactions were carried out using BigDye Terminator v.3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Capillary electrophoresis of the reaction products was done using an ABI 3500 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and the obtained nucleotide sequences were compared to reference 16S rRNA gene sequences from the NCBI GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on September 21, 2023). Bacterial strain was deposited as K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232 (GenBank ID PQ571733) in the Collection of Extremophilic Microorganisms and Type Cultures of the Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (CEMTC of the ICBFM SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia.

2.2. Phage Isolation and Propagation

The phage was isolated from the same clinical sample that was used to isolate its bacterial host. The sputum sample was suspended in 1 mL of sterile PBS, pH 7.5 and sterilized through a 0.22 μm filter (Wuxi Nest Biotechnology, Wuxi, China). Phage plaques were detected by dropping 10 μL aliquots of the filtrate onto a freshly prepared lawn of the K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232 strain in top agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, Difco, Laboratories, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Plates were then incubated overnight at 37 °C. Phage plaques were excised from the agar, suspended in sterile PBS and incubated overnight to extract phage particles. The next day, tenfold dilutions of the phage-containing eluate were applied to a fresh layer of K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232 to obtain single plaques. These plaques were used for subsequent phage isolation, and the cycle of dilution-extraction was repeated three times.
To propagate KlebP_265, K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232 was grown in 50 mL of Lysogenic Broth (LB) (BD Difco, USA) to an optical density (OD600) of 0.3 - 0.4. Phage particles were then added to exponentially growing K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1, and the infected culture was incubated with shaking at 37 °C until the bacterial lysis occurred. The resulting bacterial lysate was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 30 min. Phage particles were purified from the supernatant using polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG 6000, AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany) precipitation, as previously described [18]. The phage-containing precipitate was dissolved in 400 μl of STM buffer (0.59 g of NaCl; 7.88 g of Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; and 2.38 g of MgCl2 per liter).

2.3. Phage Plaques and Phage Particles Morphology

The morphology of KlebP_265 plaques was determined on a lawn of the host strain K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232. After the plate had been incubated overnight at 37 °C, the plaques were observed. The morphology of phage particles was determined using transmission electron microscopy, with preliminary negative staining, as described previously [19]. The samples were examined using a JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).

2.4. Host Range Analysis of the Phage KlebP_265

The host range was tested against 193 strains of Klebsiella spp., which were obtained from the CEMTC, ICBFM SB RAS. The spot-assay method was used, as described previously [20]. A bacterial lawn was prepared by mixing 50 μL of an overnight bacterial culture with 4 mL of top agar. Then, 5 μL aliquots of tenfold dilutions of phage preparation were applied to the lawn and allowed to dry. After overnight incubation at 37 °C, the plates were screened for phage plaques. Bacterial strain was considered phage-sensitive if at least a few individual phage plaques were observed on the lawn of the particular strain.
The bacterial susceptibility to KlebP_265 was assessed by the efficacy of plating (EOP) as previously described [21]. The EOP value was calculated as a ratio between the plaque forming units (PFU) on the clinical strain tested and the number of PFUs on the isolation/propagation host bacterium.

2.5. Molecular Serotyping of K. pneumoniae Strains

K-typing of the strains of K. pneumoniae was performed according to the nucleotide sequences of the wzi gene, which belongs to the gene cluster encoding synthesis of the polysaccharide capsule. Primers wzi_for 5'-TGCCGCGAGCAGCGCTTTCTATCTTGGTATTCC-3' and wzi_rev 5'-GAGAGAGCCACTGGTTCCAGAAYTTSACCC-3' [22] were used for amplification and sequencing of a 580 bp fragment of the wzi. The PCR protocol consisted of 30 cycles of amplification, with each cycle including denaturation (94 °C, 30 sec), annealing (55 °C, 40 sec), and elongation (72 °C, 30 sec). Sequencing reactions were carried out using BigDye Terminator v.3.1 (Applied Biosystems, USA). The resulting wzi sequences were analyzed using K-PAM server (Klebsiella species serotype predictor and surface antigens modeler) [23] (www.iith.ac.in/K-PAM, accessed on February 20, 2024).

2.6. Hypermucoidity and Antibiotic Resistance of Host Strains of the KlebP_265

Hypermucoidity of Klebsiella strains was determined using the string test, as described previously [24]. Bacterial colonies were grown on Blood agar base supplemented with 5 % sheep blood (OXOID, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK) at 37 °C overnight. Colonies on the agar media were pulled up using a 10-µL plastic loop, and the viscous string formation was observed. The strain was determined as hypermucous (hm) if a viscous string was >10 mm.
Klebsiella strains were tested for sensitivity to antimicrobials using disk diffusion assay (OXOID, UK) according to the EUCAST recommendations (https://www.eucast.org, accessed on 25 September 2024).

2.7. Biological Properties of Phage KlebP_265

The biological properties of the phage KlebP_265 were studied using the K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232 strain as a host. All experiments were performed in triplicate, with three technical repeats each. Phage adsorption experiments were carried out as described previously [25]. In brief, exponentially growing CEMTC 5232 cells were infected with KlebP_265 at a final concentration of 105 plaque-forming units per milliliter (pfu/mL), and the infected culture was incubated with shaking at 37 °C for 20 min. Aliquots were taken at one-minute intervals to determine the titer of free phages. To determine the latent period and burst size of the KlebP_265 phage, 10 mL of exponentially growing bacteria were centrifuged at 6,000 g for 5 min, and the bacterial pellet was then resuspended in 500 μL of LB medium (BD Difco, USA). Phage KlebP_265 was added to the cell suspension at an MOI of 0.001. The culture was incubated for 15 min for phage infection at 37 °C, after that the cells were pelleted by centrifugation, and the supernatant was removed. The bacterial pellet was suspended in 10 mL of LB. Next, the infected bacterial culture was incubated with shaking at 37 °C for 30 min, aliquots were taken every 2.5 min and used to determine phage titer. To calculate the multi-step killing curves of bacteria in the life cycle of the KlebP_265 the experiments were carried out as described previously [26]. Briefly, KlebP_265 phage particles were added to the exponentially growing K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232 at three different MOI (1, 0.1 and 0.01). The infected cultures were then incubated with shaking at 37 °C for 24 hours and aliquots were taken every 30 min to determine the titer of bacteria. The multi-step killing curves were constructed using the data obtained.
To determine whether the KlebP_265 DNA could integrate into the host genome, the KlebP_265 and CEMTC 5232 cells were co-cultured, resulting in bacteriophage-resistant mutants (BIMs) of the host strain. The experiments were conducted as described previously with some minor modifications [27]. In brief, 10 µL aliquots of the KlebP_265 phage suspension at a titer of at least 105 pfu/mL were dropped on the bacterial lawn of the host CEMTC 5232 in top agar. Then, plates were incubated at 37 °C for 19-20 hours. Any colonies of bacteria, that grew inside the clear, large plaques were transferred onto NA and tested for their sensitivity to the KlebP_265 phage. To purify BIMs from residual phage particles, they were passaged three times on the plates containing NA, and then used to detect KlebP_265 DNA. To confirm the species of the obtained BIMs, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed.
Screening for KlebP_265 DNA was carried out using primers KlepP_265_F 5'-CGTCAGTTGTCATAAACCAC-3' and KlepP_265_R 5'-CAGAATGGAGAGGAAGGATT-3' (amplify a 586 bp fragment of the ORF26). PCR protocol consisted of 30 cycles of amplification, with each cycle including denaturation (95 °C, 30 sec), annealing (54 °C, 30 sec), and elongation (72 °C, 1 min). DNA of the KlebP_265 phage and DNA of K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232, respectively, were used as positive and negative controls.

2.9. Thermal and pH Stability of KlebP_265

Thermal stability of KlebP_265 was determined as described previously with minor modifications [28]. Phage suspensions in sterile PBS (pH 7.5) were incubated at different temperatures (55 °C, 70 °C, and 90 °C) for 6 hours in parallel. Aliquots were taken every hour and the titer of KlebP_265 was determined using the host strain CEMTC 5232. Long-term storage experiments were conducted at different temperatures (‒20 °C, 4 °C, 25 °C, 37 °C, and 55 °C) for a period of 135 days in parallel. Aliquots were taken and titers of phage particles were determined at five time points: 24 hours, 14 days, 30 days, 45 days, and 135 days. To determine the stability of KlebP_265 at different pH levels, phage suspensions were incubated in sterile TrisHCl buffer (50mM) at pH values ranging from 2 to 12 for 2 hours at room temperature. The residual phage titer was checked using the host strain CEMTC 5232. Thermal and pH stability experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.10. Phage DNA Purification and Complete Genome Sequencing

Phage suspension was mixed with a DNase buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNase I and RNase (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were then added to the mixture at a final concentration of 5 µg/mL each. The phage-containing solution was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Next, EDTA (pH 8.0), SDS, and proteinase K (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were added to final concentrations of 20 mM, 0.5%, and 150 µg/mL, respectively. The phage-containing mixture was incubated at 55 °C for 3 hours. After that, the KlebP_265 DNA was purified using phenol/chloroform extraction. To precipitate the DNA, 96% ethanol was used, supplemented with 1/30 volume of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.1).
A paired-end sequencing library was prepared using NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina and Multiplex Oligos for Illumina Dual Index Primers Set 1 (New England Biolabs, Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA) for further sequencing on the MiSeq sequencer with a MiSeq reagent kit v.2 (2 × 250-cycles) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Trimmomatic v.0.32 [29] (https://github.com/usadellab/Trimmomatic, accessed on 29 September 2024) was used to filter the reads by quality and to remove the adapter sequences. The phage genome de novo assembly was performed using SPAdes v.3.15.4 [30] (http://cab.spbu.ru/software/spades, accessed on December 20, 2023), resulting in one main circular contig with a coverage of 265. The KlebP_265 genome sequence was deposited in GenBank under the accession number PQ480913.

2.11. Analysis of Phage Genome

Rapid Automated Annotation System (RAST) v.2.0 [31] (https://rast.nmpdr.org, accessed 14 March, 2024) was used to annotate the KlebP_265 genome. Annotation was manually validated using BLASTX search against protein sequences deposited in the NCBI GenBank database (https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed March 25, 2024). In addition, InterProScan and HHpred tools were used to identify protein functions [32,33] (www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/search, accessed March 27, 2024; https://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/tools/hhpred, accessed March 28, 2024). The search for tRNAs was done using tRNAscan-SE 2.0 software [34] (https://trna.ucsc.edu/tRNAscan-SE, accessed March 27, 2024). The search for virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes was carried out using the Virulence Factor (VR) database (http://www.mgc.ac.cn/VFs, accessed on April 5, 2024) and Antibiotic Resistance Gene (AGR) database (https://card.mcmaster.ca/rgi, accessed on April 6, 2024), respectively. The KlebP_265 genome termini and DNA packaging strategy were determined using the PhageTerm v.1.0.12 tool [35]. SnapGene Viewer software (GSL Biotech; available at https://www.snapgene.com; accessed April 8, 2024) was used to generate a genomic map. To assess the taxonomy of phage KlebP_265, a comparative proteomic phylogenetic analysis was performed using Viral Proteome Tree Server (ViPTree) [36] (https://www.genome.jp/viptree, accessed April 13, 2024). Intergenomic similarity (SG) was calculated using Virus Intergenomic Distance Calculator (VIRIDIC) [37] (http://rhea.icbm.uni-oldenburg.de/VIRIDIC, accessed April 13, 2024).
CoreGenes 5.0 tool [38,39] (https://coregenes.ngrok.io, accessed April 19, 2024) and Proteinortho6 [40] (https://phage.usegalaxy.eu/?tool_id=toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu%2Frepos%2Fiuc%2Fproteinortho%2Fproteinortho%2F6.3.1%2Bgalaxy2&version=latest, accessed April 19, 2024) were used to identify signature genes in the genomes of related phages. Sequences of these signature proteins were then extracted from the NCBI GenBank database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed April 20, 2024) and used for further phylogenetic analysis. Protein sequences were aligned and phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA X tool [41]. BACPHLIP software [42] was used to predict lifestyle for the phage KlebP_265.

3. Results

3.1. Phage KlebP_265 plaques and Phage Particles Morphology

The KlebP_265 phage produced clear plaques with a diameter of approximately 2 mm, surrounded by a large halo, about 3 mm, on the lawn of the K. pneumoniae host strain CEMTC 5232 (Figure 1A). Еlectron microscopy revealed phage capsids with a diameter of 55.34±1.66 nm, connected to long, flexible tails of 190±3.65 nm in length. The morphology of the phage particles corresponded to that of the siphovirus (Figure 1B).

3.2. Biological Properties of KlebP_265

Biological properties of KlebP_265 were investigated using the K. pneumoniae strain CEMTC 5232. Phage adsorption experiments revealed that most of phage particles attach to host cells in 12 min (Figure 2A). The adsorption rate constant was calculated to be 1.8 × 10⁻⁹ mL/min. This suggests that KlebP_265 can recognize several hundred receptor sites on the cell surface [43]. Phage production was analyzed using a one-step growth experiment at a MOI of 0.001. After a latent period of 15 minutes, phage particles were released from the host cells, and the burst size was determined to be approximately 26 phage particles per cell (Figure 2B).
The lytic activity assay experiments were carried out in three variants with KlebP_265 being added to the cells with a MOI of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 (Figure 2C). Multi-step killing curves of bacteria in the life cycle of the KlebP_265 were calculated, and the obtained data indicated the virulent properties of KlebP_265. It was found that bacterial lysis depends on the dose. A MOI of 1 resulted in the fastest and most significant decrease in the number of viable host cells. In this case, the number of living cells decreased by six orders of magnitude within three hours after infection.

3.3. Host Range for the Phage KlebP_265

To determine host range of the phage KlebP_265, 193 strains of Klebsiella spp. from CEMTC ICBFM SB RAS, including 158 strains of K. pneumoniae, have been tested. As a result, KlebP_265 was able to infect 25 Klebsiella strains (13%), including one K. aerogenes strain (1/8) and one K. oxytoca strain (1/27) (Table 1). Notably, all sensitive strains, both K. pneumoniae and K. aerogenes/K. oxytoca, were isolated from clinical samples collected in several hospitals at different times. According to the relative efficiency of plating (EOP), phage infected K. pneumoniae strains more effectively than K. aerogenes and K. oxytoca, which indicates the specificity of KlebP_265 for this species. Among the K. pneumoniae strains, CEMTC 4128 was the best for the phage reproduction, while the lowest level of infectivity was revealed on the lawn of the K. pneumoniae CEMTC 2554 strain (Table 1).
Analysis of K-types of K. pneumoniae sensitive strains revealed that the most of them (21 from 25) belonged to the K2 type, and that KlebP_265 was able to infect more than a half (60%) of 35 K2-type strains tested. The K2 capsule polysaccharide probably acts as a receptor for phage receptor-binding proteins. Two remaining KlebP_265-sensitive K. pneumoniae strains, CEMTC 6827 and CEMTC 6848, had the wzi allele 173 in their genomes and their K-types could not be clearly determined using only this gene (Table 1). However, KlebP_265 infected only two among the 32 tested K. pneumoniae strains with this wzi allele. Based on K-PAM database (www.iith.ac.in/K-PAM/, accessed on February 20, 2024), this allele corresponds to three different K-types: KL102, KL149, and KL155 (Table 1), so the K-type of these two strains requires further clarification.
One of the main factors contributing to the pathogenicity of Klebsiella is its thick, hypermucous capsule. To identify hypermucoid strains, a string test was conducted using all 193 Klebsiella isolates. As a result, 31 isolates were positive for this test, and 12 of them were susceptible to KlebP_265. Eleven of those phage-sensitive hypermucoid strains belonged to K2-type, and the twelfth was the K. oxytoca CEMTC 2335 strain. Notably, it was the only K. oxytoca strain that was positive for the string test out of eight studied. It appears that the excessive production of capsule material is a one of factors contributing to the attraction of the KlebP_265 phage (Table 1). The bacterial strains sensitive to KlebP_265 differed in their antibiotic resistance; the host range experiments included Klebsiella isolates that were sensitive to all tested antibiotics and those that were resistant to antibiotics from two or more different classes (Table 1, Table S1). Notably, antibiotic-resistant and even MDR strains with increased mucus production were highly susceptible to KlebP_265.

3.4. Phage KlebP_265: Temperature and pH Stability

Experiments on the thermal stability of KlebP_265 revealed that the number of viable phage particles remained constant at 55 °C for 6 hours; however, viability decreased rapidly at high temperatures, 70 °C and 90 °C (Figure 3A). Long-term storage experiments indicated that KlebP_265 was stable at various temperatures ranging from 4 °C to 37 °C (Figure 3B). Freezing, however, affected the viability of the phage, causing a decrease in titer by one order of magnitude after 14 days and by another order of magnitude after 45 days. Storage at 55 °C led to a significant reduction in titer after one month, with no viable phage particles detected by the end of the 135-day experiment (Figure 3B).
KlebP_265 phage viability was tested at a wide range of pH values, varying from 3 to 10. The phage viability showed no significant difference after 2 hours at pH values between 4 and 9. Thus, KlebP_265 is a thermally stable and pH-tolerant phage. The best storage conditions for this phage are at temperatures between 4 °C and 25 °C and at pH range from 4 to 9.

3.5. Annotation and Characterization of the KlebP_265 Genome

The length of the complete genome of KlebP_265 was 46,962 bp with the GC-content of 48.07%. PhageTerm analysis indicated no obvious genome termini; therefore, KlebP_265 phage genome is terminally redundant and completely permuted (Data S1). A total of 88 open reading frames (ORFs) were identified; of these, 34 encoded proteins with predicted functions and three corresponded to tRNAs. The remaining 51 ORFs were hypothetical (Figure 4, Table S2).
Among the ORFs with predicted functions, 13 ORFs encoded DNA metabolism proteins. No DNA- or RNA-polymerase genes were identified in the KlebP_265 genome; however, the genes encoding DNA primase, two DNA helicases, a number of DNA binding proteins, and various endonucleases and exonucleases were determined (Figure 4).
Nineteen ORFs were responsible for virion assembly and DNA packaging (Figure 4). Structural genes encoded a number of capsid and tail proteins. Among them, tail proteins essential for phage attachment and entry into the bacterial cell were found. In particular, ORF26 and ORF28 corresponded to two structural tail proteins with enzymatic activity. The first of them, gp26, is the tail spike protein, which functions as a receptor-binding protein. Its endoglycosidase activity is essential for the destruction of the host bacterium capsule during phage infection. The second tail protein, gp28, contains an endopeptidase domain and probably plays an important role in the disruption of the peptidoglycan layer during phage infection. Three other gene products, gp27, gp29, and gp30, were identified as tail tip proteins. Using BLASTP search, gp27, was determined as the TipJ family protein. In addition, HHPred analysis revealed that the N-terminal part of this protein corresponds to the tail tip assembly protein I and its C-terminal part is similar to the tip attachment protein J. Gp29 and gp30 were identified as the Tip L and Tip M proteins. It has previously been shown that Tip L plays a role in the DNA ejection during entry and in the initiation of tail assembly during exit [44]. In turn, Tip M completes the tail tip complex and initiates tail tube polymerization [44]. Presumably, these proteins of KlebP_265 form a complex tail tip structure similar to that of the Escherichia phage Lambda.
Genes encoding tail structures are followed by the gene module associated with capsid morphogenesis. This module contains the genes encoding HK97-gp10-like protein (gp44), major capsid protein (gp56), head decoration/capsid stabilizing protein (gp57), prohead core protein protease (gp58), and some other genes involved in the assembly of viral capsids. In addition, ORF77 and ORF78 are responsible for the head morphogenesis protein and portal protein, respectively. According to Vinga et al [45], the head morphogenesis protein binds viral DNA within the capsid and can control DNA exit from the virion. Portal proteins form a gateway during packaging and retrieval of phage DNA, and can be involved in procapsid assembly [46]. Of the DNA-packaging proteins, only the gene of the terminase large subunit, gp88, was identified, but not the terminase small subunit. Probably, it is due to the significant difference in the sequence of the small subunit compared to known sequences. This fact needs further investigation.
Two proteins of the phage lytic cassette have been detected: gp71 and gp72. Gp71 is the Rz-like spanin that is necessary for the destruction of the inner membrane of a bacterial cell, whereas gp72, is a lysozyme (also known as muramidase). No genes that encode integrases, toxins, or antibiotic resistance were found in the genome of KlebP_265. Therefore, this phage meets the criteria for potentially therapeutic phages.

3.6. KlebP_265 Lytic Lifestyle Confirmation

To confirm the lifestyle of the phage KlebP_265, the BACPHLIP software was used, which predicted its virulent lifestyle with a probability of 89.86%. In addition, bacteria-insensitive mutants (BIMs) of the host strain were obtained after co-cultivating the host CEMTC 5232 and KlebP_265. PCR for the presence of the ORF27 from the KlebP_265 genome was performed using lysates of these BIMs as a template. No PCR-products were detected indicating that the phage genome was not integrated into the BIM’s genomes. Thus, the Klebsiella phage KlebP_265 has a strictly lytic lifestyle.

3.7. Comparative Analysis of the Genome and Estimated Taxonomy of the KlebP_265 Phage

KlebP_265 genome was compared with the available phage genomes from the NCBI GenBank database using BLASTN search. It was found that the KlebP_265 genome is most similar at the nucleotide level to the genome of the Klebsiella phage DP01 (PP824815) and the nucleotide identity (NI) of these genomes was 0.863. This result was confirmed by the ViPTree tool indicated that both genomes formed a common branch on the VipTree dendrogram (Figure 5) and their genomes showed similar gene synteny (Figure 6). In addition, the level of intergenomic similarity (SG) between KlebP_265 and DP01 calculated using VIRIDIC was 87.5% (Figure 7) suggesting that KlebP_265 and DP01 can represent one new genus that can be named Dipiunovirus after the DP01 phage. Importantly, both CoreGenes 5.0 and Proteinortho6 revealed 32 core gene products among 34 proteins with predicted functions in these two phages.
Both KlebP_265 and DP01 are members of a monophyletic cluster containing a lot of Klebsiella phages with undefined taxonomy [28,47,48,49,50,51,52], the Aeromonas phage pIS4-A (NC_042037), which belongs to the Roufvirus genus, and the Vibrio phage pYD38-A (NC_021534) (Figure 5). To clarify KlebP_265 taxonomic position, the SG matrix for the KlebP_265 and other phages from this cluster was calculated using VIRIDIC (Figure 7). The VIRIDIC clustering seems to be consistent with the clustering made by ViPTree. In all cases, the SG value varied from 46.1% and 100%, with the exception of the Salmonella phage Skate (NC_054639), which was used as an outgroup. Several groups of phages, like KlebP_265 and DP01, showed the SG value >70% within the groups, which will allow them to be further combined into separate genera (Figure 7). Taking into consideration that the described cluster of phages is monophyletic, contains phages belonging to the approved Roufvirus and suggested Dipiunovirus genera, and the SG level is more than 46%, this cluster can be proposed as the putative Roufvirinae subfamily, denoted after the name of the first approved genus Roufvirus. Among the genomes of phages from the putative Roufvirinae subfamily, CoreGenes 5.0 and Proteinortho6, respectively, identified 18 and 24 conservative genes encoding proteins with predicted functions, and six and ten conservative genes with hypothetical functions (Table 2). In addition, analysis of genomes of putative Roufvirinae subfamily revealed that more than half of them encode from one to three tRNA genes. Thus, 12 genomes contained tRNA-Arg-TCT, tRNA-Ile-CAT or tRNA-Met-CAT, and five genomes encoded tRNA-Ser-GCT. The KlebP_265 genome had three tRNA genes, tRNA-Ser-GCT, tRNA-Arg-TCT, and tRNA-Met-CAT. Probably, this group of phages requires additional amounts of these amino acids, which are inefficiently synthesized by their hosts, and the phage tRNA genes contribute to protein biosynthesis during the infection cycle.
The neighboring cluster with the proposed Roufvirinae subfamily is a monophyletic one containing a number of enterobacterial phages, including Salmonella, Shigella, and Escherichia phages [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62], which are members of several genera (Figure 5). The SG level of the phage genomes, calculated using VIRIDIC, was more than 40% within this cluster (Data S2) and >25% between this cluster and the putative Roufvirinae subfamily. Notably, this cluster and the proposed Roufvirinae subfamily comprise in turn a monophyletic large group of phages (Figure 5) with similar genome organization (Figure 6). Considering all these facts, it can be supposed this large group of phages represents a new putative family, Skateroufviridae, which consists of two putative subfamilies, Skatevirinae (named after the most numerous genus) and Roufvirinae.
Using CoreGenes 5.0 and Proteinortho6, 13 and 18 genes with predicted functions were found to be conservative between the genomes of phages from the putative Skateroufviridae family (Table 2). Importantly, several signature genes, namely major capsid protein, major tail tube protein, and portal protein, as well as TipJ, TipL, and TipM tail tip proteins, which are similar to Lambda phage proteins, were conservative in the phage genomes from both putative subfamilies forming this monophyletic group of phages (Table 2, Figure 5). This indicates their common origin and belonging of phages to the same putative family.

3.8. Phylogenetic Analysis of KlebP_265 Proteins

Signature genes are an important characteristic of phages and can be used for taxonomic grouping. Phylogenetic analysis was performed for several signature proteins (both conservative and non-conservative) found in the genomes of phages from the putative Skateroufviridae family. The topology of the phylogenetic trees of several core proteins, namely the major tail tube protein gp37 (Figure 8A), prohead core protease gp58 (Figure S1A), and InsA C-terminal domain protein gp86 (Figure S1B) corresponded to that of the ViPTree (Figure 5); however, dendrograms of other studied signature core proteins (major capsid protein gp56 and portal protein gp78) showed contradictory phylogeny (Figure S1C, Figure S1D). As for the non-conservative signature proteins, namely terminase, DNA primase, and tail tape measure protein, their dendrograms demonstrated the dissimilar evolutionary history of these proteins (Figure 8B, Figure S1E, Figure S1F). Notably, the phylogenetic tree of the large subunit terminase, which is one of the most conservative phage proteins and is often used for taxonomy, clearly indicated the horizontal transfer of the terminase genes. The obtained results suggested the mosaicism of the genomes inherent in phages from the putative Skateroufviridae family (both Skateroufvirinae and Roufvirinae subfamilies).

4. Discussion

Recently, a number of Klebsiella phages, which genomes are similar to the investigated KlebP_265, were isolated and characterized [28,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Several of their bacterial hosts have been characterized in terms of K-typing. Thus, phage BUCT541 was active against one MDR K. pneumoniae K1-ST23 strain [48], phage vB_KpnS_ZX4 reproduced in one K1-hv strain of K. pneumoniae [52], whereas phage vB_KpnS_SCNJ1-C infected only one K54-type strain from 50 tested strains of K. pneumoniae [51]. Phage BUCT610 amplified in the K. pneumoniae strain K1119f, which belongs to highly virulent ST893 with undefined capsule type [28]. However, no reported phages from this group were specific to K2 Klebsiella strains, which are the most common among clinical isolates all over the world. So, the investigated phage KlebP_265 is the first phage capable of lysing K2 Klebsiella strains; moreover, it has a broad host range, since it was effective against 60% of the tested K. pneumoniae K2 strains. Many of K2 strains acquired a resistant or MDR phenotype and hypervirulent properties [11]. From the KlebP_265-sensitive K2 strains, most of the hypermucoid were antibiotic-resistant and one was both MDR and hypermucoid. Therefore, this virulent phage could be a promising tool for eliminating K. pneumonia infection.
According to previous studies, the capsular polysaccharides (CPSs) of Klebsiella spp. play an important role in phage adsorption [63,64]. Presumably, K2-capsule polysaccharides interact with receptor binding proteins (RBPs, tail spikes) of KlebP_265. In particular, the phage is active against hmK2 strains, and this phenotype of K. pneumoniae in most cases is associated with hypervirulent characteristics. Moreover, thick, hypermucous capsule is one of the main factors contributing to the pathogenicity of Klebsiella. It was revealed that the KlebP_265 phage preferably infected hmK2 strains of K. pneumoniae, as it reproduced in 11 from 12 (92%) tested hmK2 strains. Two mechanisms can be suggested for this phenomenon: the first is that the structure of hmK2 capsule differs from that of classical K2-type and RBPs of KlebP_265 better bind to this structure. The second hypothesis is the probable metabolic difference between cKp and hmKp, which helps the phage to efficiently reproduce in hmKp. Both hypotheses require further investigation.
In addition, KlebP_265 can infect two strains of K. pneumoniae, which have 173 allele of the wzi gene, one K. aerogenes, and one K. oxytoca strains. At the same time, only one gene corresponding to the tail spike protein (gp26) was identified in the phage genome. Therefore, the capsular polysaccharides of all these strains probably have structural similarities to the K2-type capsule, which allow the phage tail spikes to attach to the cells of these strains. Note, that phage reproduces in K. aerogenes and K. oxytoca with a low level of EOP, which indicates its main adaptation to K. pneumoniae as a host.
It was found that phage KlebP_265 is stable in a wide range of temperatures and has good pH tolerance. These properties facilitate the storage of KlebP_265 and make it a promising candidate for use in therapy. It is worth noting that these characteristics are shared by other phages within this group [28,47,48,49,50,51,52].
ViPTree and VIRIDIC analysis based on the complete genomes of KlebP_265 and related phages revealed that KlebP_265 has the closest evolutionary relations with the K. pneumoniae phage DP01 and according to the ICTV criteria [65] both phages can be classified as members of a new putative genus Dipiunovirus. Moreover, when analyzing related phages using these tools, two putative higher taxonomic groups were identified. The first one unites enterobacterial phages, which belong to eleven genera, namely Macdonaldcampvirus, Saltrevirus, Caminolopintovirus, Cedarrivervirus, Deseoctovirus, Swiduovirus, Buchananvirus, Skatevirus, Shuimuvirus, Segzyvirus, and Akiravirus (Figure 5). Second cluster contains genomes of a number of Klebsiella phages, including KlebP_265 and DP01, Vibrio phage pYD38-A (NC_021534), and Aeromonas phage pIS4-A (NC_042037). According to comparative genome analysis, both clusters are monophyletic and share intergenomic similarities, as well as gene syntheny within each cluster. So, both clusters can be classified as two separate subfamilies, Skatevirinae and Roufvirinae, which can be united into one putative new family Skateroufviridae. The analysis of signature genes revealed that phages form the putative Skatevirinae and Roufvirinae subfamilies have a similar range of core genes, with most of these genes belonging to a structural cluster of tail proteins (Table 2). In addition, thirteen and twenty genes were identified using CoreGene 6.0 and Proteinortho6, respectively as signature genes for the putative family Skateroufviridae.
Importantly, the signature genes encoding terminase, portal protein, and major capsid protein, which are usually conservative and often used for phage taxonomy, were absent among the core genes and phylogenetic analysis demonstrated their involvement in gene exchange between phages from the putative Skatevirinae and Roufvirinae subfamilies. Multiple horizontal transfers were found for a lot of other genes with predicted functions. This led to extensive genome mosaicism in phages from the suggested Skateroufviridae family that is a feature of members from this family. Apparently, mosaicism is described for a number of other phages. Probably, the observed genomic mosaicism is the result of a number of recombination and rearrangement events occurred earlier in the genomes of their common ancestors. As for members of the putative Skateviridae family, this assumption is consistent with the presence of several recombinase and HNH nuclease genes in the KlebP_265 genome and genomes of related phages.
In conclusion, we characterized KlebP_265 as a lytic phage against a spectrum of K2 MDR, and K2hm strains of K. pneumoniae. The biological properties and genome characteristics show that phage KlebP_265 has the potential to effectively eliminate the most common clinical K. pneumoniae. According to comparative genome analysis, this phage is a member of a new genus, which in turn is part of a new subfamily and family.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at the website of this paper posted on Preprints.org, Data S1: Genome termini determination using the PhageTerm tool; Data S2: SG matrix for the putative Skateviridae family prepared using VIRIDIC; Figure S1: Phylogenetic analysis of the essential proteins of the phage KlebP_265: (A) prohead core protease; (B) InsA C-terminal domain protein; (C) major capsid protein; (D) portal protein; (E) DNA primase; (F) tail length tape measure protein. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW, phylogenetic tree constructed using MEGA 11.0. Maximum-Likelihood method with bootstrap 1000 was applied. Protein sequences of phage KlebP_265 are marked with black diamonds; Table S1: Characteristics of Klebsiella strains, sensitive to the KlebP_265 phage; Table S2: Annotation of the KlebP_265 genome prepared using RAST tool.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.Y. and V.M.; methodology, V.Y. and V.M.; validation, A.T. and V.F.; formal analysis, I.B.; investigation, Y.K. and A.B.; resources, N.T.; data curation, E.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, V.Y. and V.M.; writing—review and editing, N.T.; visualization, V.Y. and V.M.; supervision, N.T.; project administration, N.T.; funding acquisition, N.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for ICBFM SB RAS, grant No 122110700002-2.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The KlebP_265 genome sequence was deposited in GenBank under the accession number PQ480913.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to technical specialist Kaverina Galina for her helpful assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dong, N.; Yang, X.; Chan, E.W.; Zhang, R.; Chen, S. Klebsiella species: Taxonomy, hypervirulence and multidrug resistance. EBioMedicine 2022, 79, 103998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ma, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, S.; Tang, L.; Chen, M.; An, Q. Proposal for reunification of the genus Raoultella with the genus Klebsiella and reclassification of Raoultella electrica as Klebsiella electrica comb. nov. Res Microbiol 2021, 172(6), 103851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wyres, K.L.; Lam, M.M.; Holt, K.E. Population genomics of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020, 18, 344–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. WHO. Global Priority List of Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development of New Antibiotics. Geneva: World Health Organization 2017.
  5. Navon-Venezia, S.; Kondratyeva, K.; Carattoli, A. Klebsiella pneumoniae: a major worldwide source and shuttle for antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2017, 41, 252–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lederman, E.R.; Crum, N.F. Pyogenic liver abscess with a focus on Klebsiella pneumoniae as a primary pathogen: an emerging disease with unique clinical characteristics. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100, 322–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fang, C.T.; Lai, S.Y.; Yi, W.C.; Hsueh, P.R.; Liu, K.L.; Chang, S.C. Klebsiella pneumoniae genotype K1: an emerging pathogen that causes septic ocular or central nervous system complications from pyogenic liver abscess. Clin Infect Dis 2007, 45, 284–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pomakova, D.K.; Hsiao, C.B.; Beanan, J.M.; et al. Clinical and phenotypic differences between classic and hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumonia: an emerging and under-recognized pathogenic variant. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2012, 31, 981–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, C.; Guo, J. Characteristics of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae genotype in genetic background for the elderly in two tertiary hospitals in China. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2018, 7, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Russo, T.A.; Marr, C.M. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Rev 2019, 32(3), e00001-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Choby, J.E.; Howard-Anderson, J.; Weiss, D.S. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae - clinical and molecular perspectives. J Intern Med 2020, 287(3), 283–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. McCabe, R.; Lambert, L.; Frazee, B. Invasive Klebsiella pneumoniae infections, California, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 2010, 16, 1490–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Siu, L.K.; Yeh, K.M.; Lin, J.C.; Fung, C.P.; Chang, F.Y. Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess: a new invasive syndrome. Lancet Infect Dis 2012, 12, 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cheng, D.L.; Liu, Y.C. Yen, M.Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Wang, R.S. Septic metastatic lesions of pyogenic liver abscess. Their association with Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in diabetic patients. Arch Intern Med 1991, 151, 1557–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lee, S.S.; Chen, Y.S.; Tsai, H.C.; et al. Predictors of septic metastatic infection and mortality among patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess. Clin Infect Dis 2008, 47, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fang, C.T.; Chuang, Y.P.; Shun, C.T.; Chang, S.C.; Wang, J.T. A novel virulence gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains causing primary liver abscess and septic metastatic complications. J Exp Med 2004, 199, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, Y.; Qian, P.Y. Conservative fragments in bacterial 16S rRNA genes and primer design for 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons in metagenomic studies. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gorodnichev, R.B.; Kornienko, M.A.; Kuptsov, N.S.; Efimov, A.D.; Bogdan, V.I.; Letarov, A.V.; Shitikov, E.A.; Ilyina, E.N. Comparison of purification methods of phage lysates of gram-negative bacteria for personalized therapy. Virology (Article in Russian) 2021, 23(3), 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morozova, V.; Kozlova, Y.; Jdeed, G.; Tikunov, A.; Ushakova, T.; Bardasheva, A.; Zhirakovskaia, E.; Poletaeva, Y.; Ryabchikova, E.; Tikunova, N.V. A Novel Aeromonas popoffii Phage AerP_220 proposed to be a member of a new Tolavirus genus in the Autographiviridae family. Viruses 2022, 14, 2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kutter, E. Phage host range and efficiency of plating. In: Clokie M.R.J., Kropinski A.M., editors. Bacteriophages: Methods and Protocols. Volume 1. Humana Press; New York, NY, USA: 2009, pp. 141–149.
  21. Fanaei, P.R.; Wagemans, J.; Kunisch, F.; Lavigne, R.; Trampuz, A.; Gonzalez, M.M. Novel Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteriophage as potential therapeutic agent. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brisse, S.; Passet, V.; Haugaard, A.B.; Babosan, A. ; Kassis-Chikhani. N.; Struve, C.; Decré, D. Wzi gene sequencing, a rapid method for determination of capsular type for Klebsiella strains. J Clin Microbiol 2013, 51, 4073–4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Patro, L.P.P.; Sudhakar, K.U.; Rathinavelan, T. K-PAM: a unified platform to distinguish Klebsiella species K- and O-antigen types, model antigen structures and identify hypervirulent strains. Sci Rep 2020, 10, 16732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bardasheva, A.V.; Fomenko, N.V.; Kalymbetova, T.V.; Babkin, I.V.; Chretien, S.O.; Zhirakovskaya, E.V.; Tikunova, N.V.; Morozova, V.V. Genetic characterization of clinical Klebsiella isolates circulating in Novosibirsk. Vavilovskii Zhurnal Genet Selektsii 2021, 25, 234–245, Russian. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kropinski, A.M.; Mazzocco, A.; Waddell, T.E.; Lingohr, E.; Johnson, R.P. Enumeration of bacteriophages by double agar overlay plaque assay. In Bacteriophages: Methods and Protocols; Clokie, M.R.J., Kropinski, A.M., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  26. Morozova, V. V, Yakubovskij, V.I.; Baykov, I.K.; Kozlova, Y.N.; Tikunov, A.Y.; Babkin, I.V.; Bardasheva, A.V.; Zhirakovskaya, E.V.; Tikunova, N.V. StenM_174: A Novel podophage that infects a wide range of Stenotrophomonas spp. and suggests a new subfamily in the family Autographiviridae. Viruses 2023, 16, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Morozova, V. , Kozlova, Y., Shedko, E. et al. Lytic bacteriophage PM16 specific for Proteus mirabilis: a novel member of the genus Phikmvvirus. Arch Virol 2016, 161, 2457–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pu, M.; Han, P.; Zhang, G.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, F.; Li, M.; An, X.; Song, L.; Chen, Y.; Fan, H.; Tong, Y. Characterization and comparative genomics analysis of a new bacteriophage BUCT610 against Klebsiella pneumoniae and efficacy assessment in Galleria mellonella larvae. Int J Mol Sci 2022, 23, 8040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Prjibelski, A.; Antipov, D.; Meleshko, D.; Lapidus, A.; Korobeynikov, A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform 2020, 70, e102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Overbeek, R.; Olson, R.; Pusch, G.D.; Olsen, G.J.; Davis, J.J.; Disz, T.; Edwards, R.A.; Gerdes, S.; Parrello, B.; Shukla, M.; et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014, 42, D206–D214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Quevillon, E.; Silventoinen, V.; Pillai, S.; Harte, N.; Mulder, N.; Apweiler, R.; Lopez, R. InterProScan: Protein domains identifier. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33, W116–W120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Söding, J.; Biegert, A.; Lupas, A.N. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33, W244–W248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chan, P.P.; Lin, B.Y.; Mak, A.J.; Lowe, T.M. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2021, 49(16), 9077–9096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Garneau, J.R.; Depardieu, F.; Fortier, L.C.; Bikard, D.; Monot, M. PhageTerm: A tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci. Rep 2017, 7, 8292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nishimura, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Kuronishi, M.; Uehara, H.; Ogata, H.; Goto, S. ViPTree: the viral proteomic tree server. Bioinformatics 2017, 33(15), 2379–2380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Moraru, C.; Varsani, A.; Kropinski, A.M. VIRIDIC – a novel tool to calculate the intergenomic similarities of prokaryote-infecting viruses. Viruses 2020, 12(11), 1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Davis, P.; Seto, D.; Mahadevan, P. CoreGenes5.0: An Updated User-Friendly Webserver for the Determination of Core Genes from Sets of Viral and Bacterial Genomes. Viruses 2022, 14, 2534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Contreras-Moreira, B.; Vinuesa, P. GET_HOMOLOGUES, a versatile software package for scalable and robust microbial pangenome analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2013, 79(24), 7696–7701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Klemm, P.; Stadler, P.F.; Lechner, M. Proteinortho6: pseudo-reciprocal best alignment heuristic for graph-based detection of (co-)orthologs. Front Bioinform 2023, 3, 1322477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018, 35(6), 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hockenberry, A.J.; Wilke, C.O. BACPHLIP: predicting bacteriophage lifestyle from conserved protein domains. PeerJ 2021, 9, e11396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kropinski, A.M. Measurement of the rate of attachment of bacteriophage to cells. In Bacteriophages: Methods and Protocols; Clokie, M.R.J., Kropinski, A.M., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 151–155. [Google Scholar]
  44. Tam, W.; Pell, L.G.; Bona, D.; Tsai, A.; Dai, X.X.; Edwards, A.M.; Hendrix, R.W.; Maxwell, K.L.; Davidson, A.R. Tail tip proteins related to bacteriophage λ gpL coordinate an iron-sulfur cluster. J Mol Biol 2013, 425(14), 2450–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vinga, I.; Dröge, A.; Stiege, A.C.; et al. The minor capsid protein gp7 of bacteriophage SPP1 is required for efficient infection of Bacillus subtilis. Molecular Microbiology 2006, 61(6), 1609–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Chaban, Y.; Lurz, R.; Brasilès, S.; Cornilleau, C.; Karreman, M.; Zinn-Justin, S.; Tavares, P.; Orlova, E.V. Structural rearrangements in the phage head-to-tail interface during assembly and infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2015, 112(22), 7009–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lu, B.; Yao, X.; Han, G.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yong, K.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Yang, Z.; Ren, M.; Cao, S. Isolation of Klebsiella pneumoniae phage vB_KpnS_MK54 and pathological assessment of endolysin in the treatment of pneumonia mice model. Front Microbiol 2022, 13, 854908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pu, M.; Li, Y.; Han, P.; Lin, W.; Geng, R.; Qu, F.; An, X.; Song, L.; Tong, Y.; Zhang, S.; Cai, Z.; Fan, H. Genomic characterization of a new phage BUCT541 against Klebsiella pneumoniae K1-ST23 and efficacy assessment in mouse and Galleria mellonella larvae. Front Microbiol 2022, 13, 950737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fayez, M.S.; Hakim, T.A.; Zaki, B.M.; Makky, S.; Abdelmoteleb, M.; Essam, K.; Safwat, A.; Abdelsattar, A.S.; El-Shibiny, A. Morphological, biological, and genomic characterization of Klebsiella pneumoniae phage vB_Kpn_ZC2. Virol J 2023, 20(1), 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Zaki, B.M.; Fahmy, N.A.; Aziz, R.K.; Samir, R.; El-Shibiny, A. Characterization and comprehensive genome analysis of novel bacteriophage, vB_Kpn_ZCKp20p, with lytic and anti-biofilm potential against clinical multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023, 13, 1077995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fang, C.; Dai, X.; Xiang, L.; Qiu, Y.; Yin, M.; Fu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, L. Isolation and characterization of three novel lytic phages against K54 serotype carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023, 13, 1265011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, P.; Shen, M.; Ma, W.; Zhou, X.; Shen, J. ; LysZX4-NCA, a new endolysin with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity for topical treatment. Virus Res 2024, 340, 199296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pickard, D.; Thomson, N.R.; Baker, S.; Wain, J.; Pardo, M.; Goulding, D.; Hamlin, N.; Choudhary, J.; Threfall, J.; Dougan, G. Molecular characterization of the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi Vi-typing bacteriophage E1. J Bacteriol. [CrossRef]
  54. Paradiso, R.; Lombardi, S.; Iodice, M.G.; Riccardi, M.G.; Orsini, M.; Bolletti Censi, S.; Galiero, G.; Borriello, G. Complete Genome Sequences of Three Siphoviridae Bacteriophages Infecting Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis. Genome Announc 2016, 4(6), e00939-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Yente, L.; Fang, L.; Xincheng, S.; Robert, L.; Vivian, W. Complete Genome Sequence of Escherichia coli Phage vB_EcoS Sa179lw, Isolated from Surface Water in a Produce-Growing Area in Northern California. Genome Announcements 2018, 6(27). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Doore, S.M.; Schrad, J.R.; Dean, W.F.; Dover, J.A.; Parent, K.N. Shigella Phages Isolated during a Dysentery Outbreak Reveal Uncommon Structures and Broad Species Diversity. J Virol 2018, 92(8), e02117-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Huang, C.; Shi, J.; Ma, W.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Wang, X. Isolation, characterization, and application of a novel specific Salmonella bacteriophage in different food matrices. Food Res Int 2018, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Rohren, M.; Xie, Y.; O'Leary, C.; Kongari, R.; Gill, J.; Liu, M. Complete Genome Sequence of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Siphophage Skate. Microbiol Resour Announc 2019, 8(27), e00541-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Choi, I.Y.; Lee, C.; Song, W.K.; Jang, S.J.; Park, M.K. Lytic KFS-SE2 phage as a novel bio-receptor for Salmonella Enteritidis detection. J Microbiol 2019, 57(2), 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Liu, Y.; Mi, L.; Mi, Z.; Huang, Y.; Li, P.; Zhang, X.; Tong, Y.; Bai, C. Complete Genome Sequence of IME207, a Novel Bacteriophage Which Can Lyse Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella. Genome Announc 2016, 4(5), e01015-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Olsen, N.S.; Lametsch, R.; Wagner, N.; Hansen, L.H.; Kot, W. Salmonella phage Akira, infecting selected Salmonella enterica Enteritidis and Typhimurium strains, represents a new lineage of bacteriophages. Arch Virol 2022, 167(10), 2049–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rodea, M.G.E.; González-Villalobos, E.; Espinoza-Mellado, M.D.R.; Hernández-Chiñas, U.; Eslava-Campos, C.A.; Balcázar, J.L.; Molina-López, J. Genomic analysis of a novel phage vB_SenS_ST1UNAM with lytic activity against Salmonella enterica serotypes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2024, 109(3), 116305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gong, Q.; Wang, X.; Huang, H.; Sun, Y.; Qian, X.; Xue, F.; Ren, J.; Dai, J.; Tang, F. Novel host recognition mechanism of the K1 capsule-specific phage of Escherichia coli: Capsular polysaccharide as the first receptor and lipopolysaccharide as the secondary receptor. J Virol 2021, 95, e0092021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, P.; Sun, H.; Ren, H.; Liu, W.; Li, G.; Zhang, C. LamB, OmpC, and the core lipopolysaccharide of Escherichia coli K-12 function as receptors of bacteriophage Bp7. J Virol 2020, 94, e00325-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Turner, D.; Kropinski, A.M.; Adriaenssens, E.M. A Roadmap for genome-based phage taxonomy. Viruses 2021, 13, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phage KlebP_265 characteristics. (A) Phage plaques morphology on the lawn of K. pneumoniae host strain CEMTC 5232; (B) Electron micrograph of the phage KlebP_265.
Figure 1. Phage KlebP_265 characteristics. (A) Phage plaques morphology on the lawn of K. pneumoniae host strain CEMTC 5232; (B) Electron micrograph of the phage KlebP_265.
Preprints 143109 g001
Figure 2. Biological properties of the phage KlebP_265. (А) Phage adsorption experiments, (B) One-step growth assay, (C) Multistep bacterial lytic curves for the host K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232, infected with phages at different MOI. The bars show standard deviations for each point.
Figure 2. Biological properties of the phage KlebP_265. (А) Phage adsorption experiments, (B) One-step growth assay, (C) Multistep bacterial lytic curves for the host K. pneumoniae CEMTC 5232, infected with phages at different MOI. The bars show standard deviations for each point.
Preprints 143109 g002
Figure 3. KlebP_265 thermal stability experiments. (A) Stability at high temperatures, (B) Long-term storage of the phage.
Figure 3. KlebP_265 thermal stability experiments. (A) Stability at high temperatures, (B) Long-term storage of the phage.
Preprints 143109 g003
Figure 4. Klebsiella phage KlebP_265 genome map. Genes encoding structural proteins and DNA-packaging proteins are marked with blue arrows; genes responsible for nucleic acids metabolism are marked with red; genes encoding proteins of lysis cassette are yellow; tRNA genes are green; other genes encoding hypothetical proteins are brown.
Figure 4. Klebsiella phage KlebP_265 genome map. Genes encoding structural proteins and DNA-packaging proteins are marked with blue arrows; genes responsible for nucleic acids metabolism are marked with red; genes encoding proteins of lysis cassette are yellow; tRNA genes are green; other genes encoding hypothetical proteins are brown.
Preprints 143109 g004
Figure 5. ViPTree analysis for the phage KlebP_265 and related phages. KlebP_265 phage is marked with red asterisk; phage genomes extracted from the NCBI Genbank and added manually into analysis are marked with red lines.
Figure 5. ViPTree analysis for the phage KlebP_265 and related phages. KlebP_265 phage is marked with red asterisk; phage genomes extracted from the NCBI Genbank and added manually into analysis are marked with red lines.
Preprints 143109 g005
Figure 6. A pairwise comparison between the KlebP_265 and several similar phages performed using the ViPTree tool. Klebsiella phage vB_KpnS_Alina (NC_049837) was used as an outgroup.
Figure 6. A pairwise comparison between the KlebP_265 and several similar phages performed using the ViPTree tool. Klebsiella phage vB_KpnS_Alina (NC_049837) was used as an outgroup.
Preprints 143109 g006
Figure 7. A VIRIDIC heatmap showing the intergenomic similarity within the cluster of KlebP_265 and its most similar phages.
Figure 7. A VIRIDIC heatmap showing the intergenomic similarity within the cluster of KlebP_265 and its most similar phages.
Preprints 143109 g007
Figure 8. Phylogenetic analysis of the essential proteins of the phage KlebP_265: major tail tubular protein (A), large subunit of terminase (B). Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW, phylogenetic tree constructed using MEGA 11.0. Maximum-Likelihood method with bootstrap 1000 was applied. Protein sequences of phage KlebP_265 are marked with black diamonds.
Figure 8. Phylogenetic analysis of the essential proteins of the phage KlebP_265: major tail tubular protein (A), large subunit of terminase (B). Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW, phylogenetic tree constructed using MEGA 11.0. Maximum-Likelihood method with bootstrap 1000 was applied. Protein sequences of phage KlebP_265 are marked with black diamonds.
Preprints 143109 g008aPreprints 143109 g008b
Table 1. Characteristics of Klebsiella strains, sensitive to the KlebP_265 phage.
Table 1. Characteristics of Klebsiella strains, sensitive to the KlebP_265 phage.
No CEMTC number Species,
GenBank ID
wzi-allele
(K-type),
GenBank ID
String test Phage titer, pfu/mL Relative EOP1 Resistance
to
antibiotics2
1 2067 K. pneumoniae,
MT439057
2 (K2),
MN371471
hpmuc 1 × 105 low R
2 2291 K. pneumoniae,
MT439061
72 (K2),
MN371475
hpmuc 1.2 × 104 low R
3 2335 K. pneumoniae,
MT436848
N.d.3 hpmuc 1.1 × 103 low S
4 2531 K. pneumoniae,
MT436839
N.d.3 2 × 103 low R
5 2554 K. pneumoniae,
MT439068
2 (K2),
MN371486
9 × 103 low MDR
6 2573 K. pneumoniae,
MT439069
2 (K2),
MN371483
1.6 × 106 low MDR
7 2945 K. pneumoniae,
MT439080
2 (K2),
MN371498
4 × 106 low MDR
8 3729 K. pneumoniae,
MT489346
2 (K2),
MT447747
1 × 106 low R
9 4065 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571727
2 (K2),
PQ609952
hpmuc 4.5 × 1011 high MDR
10 4087 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571728
2 (K2),
PQ609953
hpmuc 7 × 109 high R
11 4090 K. pneumoniae
2 (K2)
hpmuc 3.5 × 1011 high R
12 4117 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571729
2 (K2),
PQ69954
hpmuc 4 × 105 low R
13 4123 K. pneumoniae,
2 (K2),
PQ679255
2.6 × 1011 high R
14 4124 K. pneumoniae,
2 (K2),
PQ679256
hpmuc 3.4 × 1011 high S
15 4128 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571730
2 (K2),
PQ609955
5.8 × 1011 high S
16 4162 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571731
2 (K2),
PQ609956
hpmuc 1.1 × 108 medium S
17 4163 K. pneumoniae,
OR544438
2 (K2),
hpmuc 1 × 104 low R
18 4169 K. pneumoniae,
PQ671057
72 (K2),
PQ609957
2 × 1011 high S
19 52324 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571733
2 (K2),
PQ609958
3.2 × 1011 1 S
20 5234 K. pneumoniae
2 (K2)
hpmuc 3.7 × 1011 high S
21 6827 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571734
173 (-)5,
PQ609959
2 × 1011 high MDR
22 6846 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571735
2 (K2),
PQ679259
2 × 108 low MDR
23 6848 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571736
173 (-)5,
PQ609960
2 × 108 low MDR
24 9609 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571737
2 (K2),
PQ609961
hpmuc 3 × 1011 high R
25 9874 K. pneumoniae,
PQ571738
2 (K2),
PQ609962
4 × 104 low MDR
1 The EOP value = phage titer on the tested bacterium/phage titer on host bacterium, EOP values > 0.1 were ranked as ‘high’ efficiency, 0.001–0.1 as ‘medium’ efficiency, below 0.001 as ‘low’ efficiency; 2 S –strain sensitive to all tested antibiotics, R – strain resistant to two classes of antibiotics, MDR – strain resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics; 3 Not determined; 4 Bacterial host/isolation strain marked with bold; 5 K-serotype could not be clearly determined using the wzi allele 173 as it corresponds to different K-types (KL102/KL149/KL155).
Table 2. Core genes detected using CoreGenes 5.0 and Proteinortho6 in the genomes of the proposed taxonomic units.
Table 2. Core genes detected using CoreGenes 5.0 and Proteinortho6 in the genomes of the proposed taxonomic units.
No Protein (gene product1) PutativeRoufvirinae PutativeSkatevirinae PutativeSkateviridae
Coregenes 5.0 (24)4 Protein-
Otho6 (35)5
Coregenes 5.0 (20)4 Protein-
Otho6 (27)5
Coregenes 5.0 (13)4 Protein-
Otho6 (20)5
1 HP2 (gp2) +
2 HP (gp7) +
3 HP (gp9) + +
4 HP (gp10) + +
5 DNA repair helicase (gp16) + + + +
6 VRR domain-containing protein (gp19) + + +
7 ssDNA-binding protein (gp23) +
8 TipJ protein (gp27) + + + + + +
9 Minor tail protein with endopeptidase activity (gp28) +
10 TipL protein (gp29) + + + + + +
11 TipM protein (gp30) + + + + + +
12 Tape measure protein (gp31) + +
13 Tail assembly chaperone (gp32) + + + + + +
14 HP (gp33) +
15 Major tail tube protein (gp37) + + + + + +
16 Tail-to-head joining protein (gp43) + + + +
17 HK97-gp10-like protein (gp44) + + + + + +
18 Head completion protein (gp45) + + + + + +
19 Head to tail adaptor (gp47) + + + + + +
20 Structural protein (gp48) + + + +
21 HP (gp55) + + + +
22 Major capsid protein (gp56) + + + + + +
23 Capsid stabilizing protein (gp57) + +
24 Prohead core protease (gp58) + + + + + +
25 HP (gp59) + +
26 HP (gp60)
27 HP (gp61) + +
28 Lar-like restriction alleviation protein (gp62) +
29 HP (gp63) +
30 HP (gp64) + +
31 HP (gp65) + + + +
32 DUF6378 domain-containing protein (gp66) + +
33 Endolysin R (gp72) + + + +
34 HP (gp73) + +
35 HP (gp74) +
36 Head morphogenesis protein (gp77) + + + + + +
37 Portal protein (gp78) + + + + + +
38 InsA C-terminal domain protein (gp86) + + + + + +
39 Phosphatase (gp87) + +
40 Lipoprotein (YP_010053329.1)3 +
41 Holin (YP_010053300.1) 3 + +
42 Endolysin (YP_010053299.1)3 + +
1Numeration of gene products is according to the position of the corresponding genes in the genome of the KlebP_265 phage; 2 HP – hypothetical protein; 3 protein IDs according the GenBank annotation of the phage Skate (NC_054639); 4 the number of conservative genes identified using Core Genes 5.0 is given in parentheses; 5 the number of conservative genes identified using Proteinortho6 is given in parentheses.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated