Figure 1.
dragonfly wing.
Figure 1.
dragonfly wing.
Figure 2.
Symmetrical waves occur at regular intervals along the chord length. A cross-sectional photograph of both the fore and hind wings of a dragonfly is depicted via the positions indicated in the diagram at the top. (Okamoto et al. [
15]).
Figure 2.
Symmetrical waves occur at regular intervals along the chord length. A cross-sectional photograph of both the fore and hind wings of a dragonfly is depicted via the positions indicated in the diagram at the top. (Okamoto et al. [
15]).
Figure 3.
Simulation of the dragonfly wing grid structure generation process: (a) divide the domain into different areas; (b) fill the grid structure in the divided area; (c) Fold the grid structure with the dividing line as the folding line.
Figure 3.
Simulation of the dragonfly wing grid structure generation process: (a) divide the domain into different areas; (b) fill the grid structure in the divided area; (c) Fold the grid structure with the dividing line as the folding line.
Figure 4.
Generation process of main vein branch structure: (a) selects the starting point of the first branch and determines the direction vector; (b) generates the starting point of the second branch; (c) determines the direction vector of the second branch; (d) generates the second branch; (e) generates the starting point of the third branch and determines the direction vector of the third branch; (f) generates the third branch; (g) and (h) add the enhanced branch.
Figure 4.
Generation process of main vein branch structure: (a) selects the starting point of the first branch and determines the direction vector; (b) generates the starting point of the second branch; (c) determines the direction vector of the second branch; (d) generates the second branch; (e) generates the starting point of the third branch and determines the direction vector of the third branch; (f) generates the third branch; (g) and (h) add the enhanced branch.
Figure 5.
The direction vector of the branch is determined. The red dot is the starting point of the first branch and the direction vector control parameters of the first branch is θ1; the green dot is the starting point of the second branch; θ2 and θ3 are the direction vector control parameters of the second branch.
Figure 5.
The direction vector of the branch is determined. The red dot is the starting point of the first branch and the direction vector control parameters of the first branch is θ1; the green dot is the starting point of the second branch; θ2 and θ3 are the direction vector control parameters of the second branch.
Figure 6.
The Voronoi grid is filled in different regions of the segmentation: (a) initial Voronoi filling grid; (b) filling grid becomes centroid Voronoi grid.
Figure 6.
The Voronoi grid is filled in different regions of the segmentation: (a) initial Voronoi filling grid; (b) filling grid becomes centroid Voronoi grid.
Figure 7.
M-V Definition: Fold clockwise along the M fold line with a positive folding angle θ, and fold counterclockwise along the V fold line with a negative folding angle -θ, When the folding angle is 180°, point a and point b are folding coincidence points.
Figure 7.
M-V Definition: Fold clockwise along the M fold line with a positive folding angle θ, and fold counterclockwise along the V fold line with a negative folding angle -θ, When the folding angle is 180°, point a and point b are folding coincidence points.
Figure 8.
In the process of a plane grid structure changing into a fold grid structure: (a)In order to quickly make the grid structure reach a balanced and stable state in the folding process the gravity direction load is increased at the nodes; (b) folded grid structure.
Figure 8.
In the process of a plane grid structure changing into a fold grid structure: (a)In order to quickly make the grid structure reach a balanced and stable state in the folding process the gravity direction load is increased at the nodes; (b) folded grid structure.
Figure 9.
cross-section of the fold grid structure.
Figure 9.
cross-section of the fold grid structure.
Figure 10.
Adding an offset to the start of the second-generation branch of the same branch generates leaf veins liked structure.
Figure 10.
Adding an offset to the start of the second-generation branch of the same branch generates leaf veins liked structure.
Figure 11.
To generate the dragonfly vein, (a) divides the wing into different regions with the vein line generated by the above method; (b) adds the normal phase vector offset to the straight vein line and turns it into a curve form; and (c) adjusts the position and direction of the normal phase vector to make the vein line close to the real vein form.
Figure 11.
To generate the dragonfly vein, (a) divides the wing into different regions with the vein line generated by the above method; (b) adds the normal phase vector offset to the straight vein line and turns it into a curve form; and (c) adjusts the position and direction of the normal phase vector to make the vein line close to the real vein form.
Figure 12.
Centroid Voronoi grid is filled in: (a) The discrete structure points in the branch region are used to generate polygonal grid; (b) the initially generated polygonal grid (green); and (c) the grid is homogenized to generate the final centroid Voronoi grid, (d) The generated 2D vein grid structure.
Figure 12.
Centroid Voronoi grid is filled in: (a) The discrete structure points in the branch region are used to generate polygonal grid; (b) the initially generated polygonal grid (green); and (c) the grid is homogenized to generate the final centroid Voronoi grid, (d) The generated 2D vein grid structure.
Figure 13.
The load distribution increased at the grid structure node: (a) near the wing root region; (b) near the edge region.
Figure 13.
The load distribution increased at the grid structure node: (a) near the wing root region; (b) near the edge region.
Figure 14.
The process of forewing model folding structure: (a)The wing veins are defined as folding lines: M=6, V=7; (b) Fold generating after the folding lines definition is completed; (c) fold becomes obvious; (d) With the increase of folding angle, part of the grid does not reach the stable state; (e) the final stable state of the three-dimensional forewing model.
Figure 14.
The process of forewing model folding structure: (a)The wing veins are defined as folding lines: M=6, V=7; (b) Fold generating after the folding lines definition is completed; (c) fold becomes obvious; (d) With the increase of folding angle, part of the grid does not reach the stable state; (e) the final stable state of the three-dimensional forewing model.
Figure 15.
final forewing three-dimensional model: (a) forewing model fold structure; (b) in the quadrilateral area, the boundary of quadrilateral element will directly become the folding line; (c) In the pentagonal and hexagonal area, the offset of folding is small.
Figure 15.
final forewing three-dimensional model: (a) forewing model fold structure; (b) in the quadrilateral area, the boundary of quadrilateral element will directly become the folding line; (c) In the pentagonal and hexagonal area, the offset of folding is small.
Figure 16.
The cross-section corrugated structure of the forewing model. The variation of corrugations along the chord length is shown in the four sections. The depth of the fold decreases gradually from the leading edge to the trailing edge, and the depth of the fold is 0.26-0.56mm.
Figure 16.
The cross-section corrugated structure of the forewing model. The variation of corrugations along the chord length is shown in the four sections. The depth of the fold decreases gradually from the leading edge to the trailing edge, and the depth of the fold is 0.26-0.56mm.
Figure 17.
Finite element analysis of the forewing model: (a) stress of the dragonfly wing; (b) displacement of the dragonfly wing; (c) first mode frequency; (d) second mode frequency. The weight of dragonfly m=865.3mg, the wing area Af=713.32mm2, and the average load on the wing surface is qave, .
Figure 17.
Finite element analysis of the forewing model: (a) stress of the dragonfly wing; (b) displacement of the dragonfly wing; (c) first mode frequency; (d) second mode frequency. The weight of dragonfly m=865.3mg, the wing area Af=713.32mm2, and the average load on the wing surface is qave, .
Figure 18.
Biomimetic grid structure design application process.
Figure 18.
Biomimetic grid structure design application process.
Figure 19.
Two-dimensional plane design: (a) Two-dimensional design domain; (b) Structure obtained by simulating dragonfly wing veins.
Figure 19.
Two-dimensional plane design: (a) Two-dimensional design domain; (b) Structure obtained by simulating dragonfly wing veins.
Figure 20.
The structure cross-section obtained by simulating dragonfly wing vein, r is the radius of branch structure, r is the radius of filling grid.
Figure 20.
The structure cross-section obtained by simulating dragonfly wing vein, r is the radius of branch structure, r is the radius of filling grid.
Figure 21.
The bionic vein grid structure is compared with the quadrilateral grid structure. The results show that the weight difference between the two structures is less than 3%, under the same load and support conditions, compared with the quadrilateral grid structure, the buckling load of the grid structure biomimetic dragonfly's wing vein increases 11%, and the first-order modal frequency of the structure increases by 2.6 times: (a) Buckling of biomimetic vein grid structure; (b) buckling of quadrilateral grid structure; (c) the first mode of biomimetic vein grid structure; (d) the first mode of quadrilateral grid structure.
Figure 21.
The bionic vein grid structure is compared with the quadrilateral grid structure. The results show that the weight difference between the two structures is less than 3%, under the same load and support conditions, compared with the quadrilateral grid structure, the buckling load of the grid structure biomimetic dragonfly's wing vein increases 11%, and the first-order modal frequency of the structure increases by 2.6 times: (a) Buckling of biomimetic vein grid structure; (b) buckling of quadrilateral grid structure; (c) the first mode of biomimetic vein grid structure; (d) the first mode of quadrilateral grid structure.
Figure 22.
Elliptic design domain: (a)ellipsoidal domain under a distributed loading; (b) structure solution obtained for ellipsoidal domain,and the section radius R of the branch structure to the filled grid r is 3:1.
Figure 22.
Elliptic design domain: (a)ellipsoidal domain under a distributed loading; (b) structure solution obtained for ellipsoidal domain,and the section radius R of the branch structure to the filled grid r is 3:1.
Figure 23.
Comparing the bionic vein grid structure with the quadrilateral grid structure, the weight difference between the two structures is less than 4%, under the same load and support conditions, compared with the quadrilateral grid structure, the buckling load of the grid structure biomimetic dragonfly's wing vein increases 74.2%, and the first-order modal frequency of the structure increases by 32%: (a) bionic vein grid structure; (b) quadrilateral grid structure buckles; (c) bionic vein grid structure first-order mode; (d) quadrilateral grid structure first-order mode.
Figure 23.
Comparing the bionic vein grid structure with the quadrilateral grid structure, the weight difference between the two structures is less than 4%, under the same load and support conditions, compared with the quadrilateral grid structure, the buckling load of the grid structure biomimetic dragonfly's wing vein increases 74.2%, and the first-order modal frequency of the structure increases by 32%: (a) bionic vein grid structure; (b) quadrilateral grid structure buckles; (c) bionic vein grid structure first-order mode; (d) quadrilateral grid structure first-order mode.
Figure 24.
Design domain of the thin-walled shell (a) Thin-walled cylinder design domain; (b) Thin-walled cylinder grid structure of biomimetic dragonfly wing veins.
Figure 24.
Design domain of the thin-walled shell (a) Thin-walled cylinder design domain; (b) Thin-walled cylinder grid structure of biomimetic dragonfly wing veins.
Figure 25.
Cross-section diagram of thin-walled cylinder grid structure of biomimetic dragonfly's wing vein in which R is the radius of main structure and r is the radius of filling grid.
Figure 25.
Cross-section diagram of thin-walled cylinder grid structure of biomimetic dragonfly's wing vein in which R is the radius of main structure and r is the radius of filling grid.
Figure 26.
Comparing the bionic vein grid structure with the quadrilateral grid structure, the weight difference between the two structures is less than 5%, under the same load and support conditions, compared with the quadrilateral grid structure, the buckling load of the folded grid structure biomimetic dragonfly's wing vein increases 52%, and the first-order modal frequency of the structure increases 39.3%: (a) bionic vein grid structure buckles; (b) quadrilateral grid structure buckles; (c) bionic vein grid structure first-order mode; (d) quadrilateral grid structure first-order mode.
Figure 26.
Comparing the bionic vein grid structure with the quadrilateral grid structure, the weight difference between the two structures is less than 5%, under the same load and support conditions, compared with the quadrilateral grid structure, the buckling load of the folded grid structure biomimetic dragonfly's wing vein increases 52%, and the first-order modal frequency of the structure increases 39.3%: (a) bionic vein grid structure buckles; (b) quadrilateral grid structure buckles; (c) bionic vein grid structure first-order mode; (d) quadrilateral grid structure first-order mode.
Figure 27.
Design domain of the airfoil surface: (a) Airfoil design domain; (b) The wing surface grid structure of biomimetic dragonfly wing veins.
Figure 27.
Design domain of the airfoil surface: (a) Airfoil design domain; (b) The wing surface grid structure of biomimetic dragonfly wing veins.
Figure 28.
Section diagram of curved grid structure of biomimetic dragonfly wing vein, where R is the radius of main structure, r is the radius of filling grid.
Figure 28.
Section diagram of curved grid structure of biomimetic dragonfly wing vein, where R is the radius of main structure, r is the radius of filling grid.
Figure 29.
The comparison between bionic vein grid structure and quadrilateral grid structure shows that the weight difference between the two structures is less than 5%, the buckling load of the folded bionic dragonfly vein structure is nearly 4 times higher, and the buckling load is mainly borne by the branch structure. The filling grid structure increases the first-order modal frequency of the whole structure by 1.8 times: (a) The buckling of biomimetic vein grid structure mainly occurs in the filled grid; (b) Quadrilateral grid structure buckling; (c) simulates the first-order mode of vein grid structure; (d) quadrilateral grid structure.
Figure 29.
The comparison between bionic vein grid structure and quadrilateral grid structure shows that the weight difference between the two structures is less than 5%, the buckling load of the folded bionic dragonfly vein structure is nearly 4 times higher, and the buckling load is mainly borne by the branch structure. The filling grid structure increases the first-order modal frequency of the whole structure by 1.8 times: (a) The buckling of biomimetic vein grid structure mainly occurs in the filled grid; (b) Quadrilateral grid structure buckling; (c) simulates the first-order mode of vein grid structure; (d) quadrilateral grid structure.
Table 1.
Material parameters.
Table 1.
Material parameters.
| Material parameters |
|
| E1 [N/mm2] |
134,000 |
| E2 = E3 [N/mm2 ] |
7,900 |
| ν12 =ν13 |
0.33 |
| G12 = G13 [N/mm2 ] |
4,620 |
| G23 [N/mm2 ] |
3,200 |