Submitted:
07 December 2024
Posted:
09 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Overview of the Study Area
2.2. Data Sources and Basis for Epiphytic Plant Species
2.3. Data Sources and Basis for Ancient Architecture
2.4. Driving Variables
2.5. Data Analysis of Driving Mechanisms
3. Results
3.1. The Spatial Distribution of Epiphytic Flora


3.2. The Characteristics of Epiphytes

3.3. Drivers of Epiphyte Species Richness and Abundance in Ancient Buildings (Overall)
3.4. Analysis of Species Richness and Plant Population Drivers of Ancient Architectural Epiphytes (Taxonomic)
4. Discussion
4.1. Species Composition of Epiphytes of Ancient Buildings on Hainan Island
4.2. Composition of Epiphyte Classes for Ancient Buildings on Hainan Island
4.3. Analysis of Epiphyte Driving Mechanisms in Ancient Buildings on Hainan Island
4.4. Suggestions for Conservation of Ancient Buildings on Hainan Island
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Appendix A

References
- Hu, Y.n.; Connor, D.S.; Stuhlmacher, M.; Peng, J.; Turner Ii, B.L. More urbanization, more polarization: evidence from two decades of urban expansion in China. npj Urban Sustainability 2024, 4, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafari Sharami, H.; Hosseini, S.J. Theoretical framework of the Isfahani style: Inspiring sustainable aspects of a vernacular urban development. Frontiers of Architectural Research 2024, 13, 349–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Xie, H.; Li, Y.; Hokoi, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X. Water-related deterioration risk assessment for sustainable conservation of heritage buildings in the Forbidden City, China. Developments in the Built Environment 2024, 17, 100293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Xia, C.; Wu, R.; Ma, Y.; Mu, B.; Wang, T.; Petropoulos, E.; Hokoi, S. Role of the urban plant environment in the sustainable protection of an ancient city wall. Building and Environment 2021, 187, 107405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wardle, P. Vegetation of new zealand; CUP Archive: 1991.
- Hoeber, V.; Zotz, G. Accidental epiphytes: Ecological insights and evolutionary implications. Ecological Monographs 2022, 92, e1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pittendrigh, C.S. The Bromeliad-Anopheles-Malaria Complex in Trinidad. I-The Bromeliad Flora. Evolution 1948, 2, 58–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spicer, M.E.; Woods, C.L. A case for studying biotic interactions in epiphyte ecology and evolution. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2022, 54, 125658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamati, S.; Medeiros, J.S.; Ward, D. Effects of competition and site conditions on Juniperus virginiana performance and physiology along a stress gradient. 2024.
- Bertness, M.D.; Callaway, R. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 1994, 9, 191–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Lima, M.F. The association between maintenance and biodiversity in urban green spaces: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 2024, 251, 105153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, A.K.; Jain, K.K.; Garg, K.L. Role of higher plants in the deterioration of historic buildings. Science of The Total Environment 1995, 167, 375–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caneva, G.; Pacini, A.; Celesti Grapow, L.; Ceschin, S. The Colosseum's use and state of abandonment as analysed through its flora. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation 2003, 51, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sax, D.F.; Schlaepfer, M.A.; Olden, J.D. Valuing the contributions of non-native species to people and nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2022, 37, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhenyu, W.J.S.S., Repairs; Xv, M.O.H.A. Initial exploration of a protection system for historical and cultural towns and villages in Hainan, China. 2017, 171, 297.
- Zhang, H.-L.; Guo, L.-Y.; Nizamani, M.M.; Wang, H.-F. Distribution patterns and drivers of urban green space and plant diversity in Haikou, China. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.-F.; Harris, A.J.; Qureshi, S.; Zhou, J.-J. Editorial: Distribution patterns, driving mechanisms and ecological service functions of urban plant biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 2023, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wohlgemuth, T.; Nobis, M.P.; Kienast, F.; Plattner, M. Modelling vascular plant diversity at the landscape scale using systematic samples. Journal of Biogeography 2008, 35, 1226–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Zeyu, Q.; Ping, J.; Qingping, D. The Application of Plant Culture in Architectural Decorations of Classical Gardens of Yangzhou. Journal of Landscape Research 2018, 10, 118. [Google Scholar]
- Masi, A.; Vignola, C.; Lazzara, A.; Moricca, C.; Serlorenzi, M.; Ferrandes, A.F. The first extensive study of an Imperial Roman Garden in the city of Rome: the Horti Lamiani. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 2024, 33, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanellou, E.; Papafotiou, M.; Saitanis, C.; Economou, G. Ecological Analysis and Opportunities for Enhancement of the Archaeological Landscape: The Vascular Flora of Seven Archaeological Sites in Greece. Environments 2024, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Gao, X.-F.; Zhang, L.-B. Polystichum hainanicola (Dryopteridaceae), a new fern species from Hainan Island, China. Phytotaxa 2013, 85, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haiqing Xu, W.L. Species diversity and distribution of epiphytes in the montane moist evergreen broad-leaved forest in Ailao Mountain,Yunnan. Biodiversity Science 2005, 13, 137–147. [Google Scholar]
- Reichgelt, T. Linking the macroclimatic niche of native lithophytic ferns and their prevalence in urban environments. American Journal of Botany 2024, 111, e16364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lundholm, J.T.; Marlin, A. Habitat origins and microhabitat preferences of urban plant species. Urban Ecosystems 2006, 9, 139–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lundholm, J. Ecology in the natural city: Testing and applying the Urban Cliff Hypothesis. Ekistics 2004, 71, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larson, D.W.; Matthes, U.; Kelly, P.E. Cliff ecology: pattern and process in cliff ecosystems. 2000.
- Chen, C.; Mao, L.; Qiu, Y.; Cui, J.; Wang, Y. Walls offer potential to improve urban biodiversity. Scientific Reports 2020, 10, 9905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zolfagharzadeh, H.; kiani, k. Analyzing the structural and semantic dimensions of traditional Chinese architecture and gardening (Case example of imperial buildings in Beijing). Journal of Environmental Science Studies 2023, 8, 6987–7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staude, I.R. Gardens as drivers of native plant species dispersal and conservation. People and Nature 2024, 6, 1220–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pyšek, P. Alien and native species in Central European urban floras: a quantitative comparison. Journal of Biogeography 1998, 25, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marini, L.; Battisti, A.; Bona, E.; Federici, G.; Martini, F.; Pautasso, M.; Hulme, P.E. Alien and native plant life-forms respond differently to human and climate pressures. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2012, 21, 534–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Sorte, F.A.; McKinney, M.L.; Pyšek, P.; Klotz, S.; Rapson, G.L.; Celesti-Grapow, L.; Thompson, K. Distance decay of similarity among European urban floras: the impact of anthropogenic activities on β diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2008, 17, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, X.-L.; Nizamani, M.M.; Jim, C.-Y.; Balfour, K.; Da, L.-J.; Qureshi, S.; Zhu, Z.-X.; Wang, H.-F.J.R.S. Using SPOT Data and FRAGSTAS to analyze the relationship between plant diversity and green space landscape patterns in the tropical coastal city of Zhanjiang, China. 2020, 12, 3477.
- Li, X.-P.; Fan, S.-X.; Guan, J.-H.; Zhao, F.; Dong, L. Diversity and influencing factors on spontaneous plant distribution in Beijing Olympic Forest Park. Landscape and Urban Planning 2019, 181, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilie, D.; Cosmulescu, S. Spontaneous Plant Diversity in Urban Contexts: A Review of Its Impact and Importance. Diversity 2023, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, M.; Song, Y.; Lu, D.; Qiu, Z. Geospatial Environmental Influence on Forest Carbon Sequestration Potential of Tropical Forest Growth in Hainan Island, China. Frontiers in Environmental Science 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muvengwi, J.; Ndagurwa, H.G.T.; Witkowski, E.T.F.; Mbiba, M. Woody species composition, diversity, and ecosystem services of yards along an urban socioeconomic gradient. Science of The Total Environment 2024, 912, 168976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- von der Lippe, M.; Kowarik, I. Do cities export biodiversity? Traffic as dispersal vector across urban–rural gradients. Diversity and Distributions 2008, 14, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Von Der Lippe, M.; Kowarik, I. Long-Distance Dispersal of Plants by Vehicles as a Driver of Plant Invasions. Conservation Biology 2007, 21, 986–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hansen, M.J.; Clevenger, A.P. The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors. Biological Conservation 2005, 125, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urban, M.C.; Alberti, M.; De Meester, L.; Zhou, Y.; Verrelli, B.C.; Szulkin, M.; Schmidt, C.; Savage, A.M.; Roberts, P.; Rivkin, L.R.; et al. Interactions between climate change and urbanization will shape the future of biodiversity. Nature Climate Change 2024, 14, 436–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukopp, H. Human-caused impact on preserved vegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 68, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ricklefs, R.E.; Miller, G. Ecology; Macmillan: 2000.
- Aguilar, R.; Ashworth, L.; Galetto, L.; Aizen, M.A. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 2006, 9, 968–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, X.-L.; Nizamani, M.M.; Jim, C.Y.; Balfour, K.; Da, L.-J.; Qureshi, S.; Zhu, Z.-X.; Wang, H.-F. Using SPOT Data and FRAGSTAS to Analyze the Relationship between Plant Diversity and Green Space Landscape Patterns in the Tropical Coastal City of Zhanjiang, China. Remote Sensing 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Liu, X.; Fan, P.; Wu, Y. Traditional usage of wild edible plants reflecting the dietary habits and the awareness of health care of LI minority in Baoting and Lingshui, Hainan Island, China: An ethnobotanical approach. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 2019, 48, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, A.; Rene, E.R.; Bilyaminu, A.M.; Chellam, P.V. Advances in amelioration of air pollution using plants and associated microbes: An outlook on phytoremediation and other plant-based technologies. Chemosphere 2024, 358, 142182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adamovich, I.; Sivakov, V.; Voinash, S.; Sokolova, V.; Orekhovskaya, A.; Zagidullin, R.; Lushpaeva, M. Epigeic bryophytes of Bryansk parks and prospects for their use in landscape architecture. E3S Web of Conf. 2024, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elgohary, Y.M.; Mansour, M.M.A.; Salem, M.Z.M. Assessment of the potential effects of plants with their secreted biochemicals on the biodeterioration of archaeological stones. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 2024, 14, 12069–12083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Li, C.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, T. Arid Urban Green Areas Reimagined: Transforming Landscapes with Native Plants for a Sustainable Future in Aksu, Northwest China. Sustainability 2024, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Region | M | SD | F | p-Values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Countryside | 22.280 | 16.157 | 0.126 | 0.882 |
| Suburbia | 23.060 | 13.901 | ||
| Urban area | 20.200 | 12.007 |
| Family | Percentage (Number of Plants) | Species | Percentage (Number of Plants) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moraceae | 22.84%(5849) | Ficus pumila | 19.05%(4879) |
| Urticaceae | 15.44%(3955) | Pilea microphylla | 14.82%(3795) |
| Polypodiaceae | 11.21%(2872) | Phymatosorus scolopendria | 8.79%(2252) |
| Nephrolepis | 7.44%(1905) | Nephrolepis auriculata | 7.44%(1905) |
| Adiantaceae | 5.68%(1455) | Adiantum caudatum | 5.68%(1455) |
| Compositae | 5.62%(1439) | Eremochloa ciliaris | 2.99%(767) |
| Pteridaceae | 4.37%(1120) | Pyrrosia adnascens | 2.39%(612) |
| Rubiaceae | 3.76%(963) | Paederia scandens | 2.33%(597) |
| Vitaceae | 2.97%(762) | Eupatorium odoratum | 1.81%(463) |
| Gramineae | 2.83%(725) | Ficus tinctoria | 1.73%(444) |
| Euphorbiaceae | 1.74%(446) | Basella alba | 1.53%(393) |
| Portulacaceae | 1.63%(417) | Boerhavia diffusa | 1.37%(350) |
| Basellaceae | 1.53%(393) | Pteris ensiformis | 1.36%(348) |
| Nyctaginaceae | 1.38%(353) | Digitaria ciliaris | 1.13%(290) |
| Solanaceae | 1.29%(330) | Bidens pilosa | 1.06%(272) |
| Crassulaceae | 1.10%(281) | Solanum procumbens | 1.02%(262) |
| Thelypteridaceae | 0.91%(232) | Phyllanthus urinaria | 0.94%(242) |
| Sinopteridaceae | 0.88%(225) | Cayratia japonica | 0.91%(232) |
| Cyperaceae | 0.56%(144) | Cyclosorus parasiticus | 0.89%(228) |
| Araceae | 0.55%(140) | Cissus repens | 0.88%(225) |
| Oxalidaceae | 0.55%(140) | ||
| Total | 94.27%(24146) | 78.13%(20011) |
| Different Factors | Specie Richness N=44 β Coefficient |
Abundance N=44 β Coefficient |
||
| Intercept | Negative | *** | Negative | *** |
| Height of ancient building | Negative | ** | NA | |
| Longitude | Positive | *** | Positive | *** |
| Latitude | Positive | *** | Positive | |
| Area of ancient building | Negative | *** | Negative | *** |
| Building age | Negative | *** | Negative | *** |
| Surrounding population density | NA | Positive | *** | |
| Rate of increase in the general public revenue budget of the Government | Positive | *** | Positive | *** |
| Number of commercial outlets | Positive | *** | Positive | *** |
| Number of tourists per day | Positive | ** | Negative | *** |
| Annual passenger traffic | Negative | *** | Negative | *** |
| Number of repairs per year | NA | NA | ||
| Green coverage of surrounding areas | Positive | ** | NA | |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.4429 | 0.5916 | ||
| Akaike information criterion(AIC) | -506.31 | -710.11 | ||
| P-values | *** | *** | ||
| Different Factors | Herbs N=44 β Coefficient |
Shrubs N=44 β Coefficient |
Trees N=44 β Coefficient |
Annual N=44 β Coefficient |
Perennial N=44 β Coefficient |
Native Species N=44 β Coefficient |
Introduced Species N=44 β Coefficient |
Cultivated Species N=44 β Coefficient |
Wild Species N=44 β Coefficient |
Ornamental Value N=44 β Coefficient |
Edible Value N=44 β Coefficient |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** |
| Height of ancient building | Negative | . | NA | NA | NA | Negative | ** | Negative | *** | NA | NA | Negative | ** | Negative | ** | Negative | ** | |||||
| Longitude | Positive | *** | Positive | ** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | ** | Positive | * | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** |
| Latitude | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | . | Positive | . | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | . |
| Area of ancient building | Positive | *** | Positive | . | NA | Negative | *** | Positive | Negative | *** | NA | NA | Negative | *** | Negative | * | Negative | ** | ||||
| Building age | Positive | *** | NA | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | ** | Negative | *** | NA | NA | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | ** | |||
| Rate of increase in the general public revenue budget of the Government | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** |
| Number of commercial outlets | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | NA | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | * | Positive | * | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | |
| Number of tourists per day | Positive | ** | NA | NA | Positive | * | Positive | * | Positive | ** | Positive | * | Positive | Positive | ** | Positive | ** | Positive | * | |||
| Annual passenger traffic | Positive | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** |
| Green coverage of surrounding areas | Positive | ** | NA | NA | Positive | ** | Positive | Positive | ** | NA | NA | Positive | * | Positive | * | Positive | * | |||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.4521 | 0.4173 | 0.5355 | 0.4389 | 0.4548 | 0.5268 | 0.3436 | 0.3657 | 0.476 | 0.4394 | 0.4901 | |||||||||||
| Akaike information criterion(AIC) | -330.79 | -71.68 | -103.33 | -115.8 | -394.17 | -433.93 | -104.67 | -53.67 | -457.71 | -331.77 | -166.87 | |||||||||||
| P-value | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |||||||||||
| Different Factors |
Herbs N=44 β Coefficient |
Shrubs N=44 β Coefficient |
Trees N=44 β Coefficient |
Annual N=44 β Coefficient |
Perennial N=44 β Coefficient |
Native Species N=44 β Coefficient |
Introduced Species N=44 β Coefficient |
Cultivated Species N=44 β Coefficient |
Wild Species N=44 β Coefficient |
Ornamental Value N=44 β Coefficient |
Edible Value N=44 β Coefficient |
|||||||||||
| Intercept | Negative | *** | Positive | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | |
| Longitude | Positive | *** | NA | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | |
| Area of ancient building | Negative | *** | NA | NA | Negative | *** | Negative | ** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | * | Negative | *** | Negative | ** | NA | |||
| Building age | Negative | * | Positive | ** | Positive | . | NA | Negative | * | Negative | ** | Negative | * | Negative | Negative | ** | Negative | * | Negative | *** | ||
| Surrounding population density | Positive | *** | Positive | . | Positive | * | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | ** | Positive | * | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** |
| Rate of increase in the general public revenue budget of the Government | Positive | *** | NA | Positive | * | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | |
| Number of commercial outlets | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** | Positive | *** |
| Number of tourists per day | Negative | * | NA | Negative | ** | NA | Negative | *** | Negative | ** | NA | NA | Negative | *** | Negative | ** | NA | |||||
| Annual passenger traffic | Negative | *** | NA | Negative | . | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | Negative | *** | |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.5766 | 0.3467 | 0.6212 | 0.5493 | 0.5622 | 0.6392 | 0.4343 | 0.4236 | 0.5998 | 0.5660 | 0.6198 | |||||||||||
| Akaike information criterion(AIC) | -504.79 | -54.15 | -124.43 | -177.79 | -517.11 | -576.16 | -136.83 | -59.38 | -633.66 | -458.5 | -226.94 | |||||||||||
| P-value | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |||||||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).