Submitted:
05 December 2024
Posted:
06 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Production of Composite Plates
2.2. Impact Tests
2.3. Considerations to the Quality of Interface and Fracture Energy Relationship
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Results to the Charpy Test in Intact Specimens
3.2. Results to the Charpy Test in Aged Specimens

| 40% | 50% | 60% | |
| 40% | 0,0004976 | 1,095E-06 | |
| 50% | 6,27 | 0,05142 | |
| 60% | 9,783 | 3,513 |
3.3. The Quality of Interface and Fracture Energy Relantionship

4. Conclusions
References
- PARVATHANENI et al. Prediction of impact behaviour for natural fiber-reinforced composites using the finite element method. Composites and Advanced Materials, v. 31, 2022. [CrossRef]
- XU, B. et al. Effect of moisture in flax fiber on viscoelastic properties of the manufactured flax fiber reinforced polymer by fractional-order viscoelastic model. Materials Today Communications, v. 40, 2024. [CrossRef]
- SYDUZZAMAN et al. Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites for Ballistic Protection: Design, Performance, and Challenges. Results in Materials, 2024. [CrossRef]
- SONI, A. et al. An overview of recent trends and future prospects of sustainable natural fiber-reinforced polymeric composites for tribological applications. Industrial Crops and Products, v. 222, 2024. [CrossRef]
- KAREEM, A. et al. Influence of the stacking on mechanical and physical properties of jute/banana natural fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite. Materials Today Proceedings, 2023. [CrossRef]
- SINGH, M. K. et al. A comprehensive review of various factors for application feasibility of natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Results in Materials, v. 17, 2023. [CrossRef]
- KOPPULA , S. B. et al. Investigation into the mechanical characteristics of natural fiber-reinforced polymer composites: Effects of flax and e-glass reinforcement and stacking configuration. Materials Today Proceedings, 2023. [CrossRef]
- SEID, A. M.; ADIMASS, S. A. Review on the impact behavior of natural fiber epoxy based composites. Heliyon, v. 10, n. 20, 2024. [CrossRef]
- VISHWASH, B.; SHIVAKUMAR, N.D.; SACHIDANANDA., K.B. Analytical investigation of green composite lamina utilizing natural fiber to strengthen PLA. Hybrid Advances, 2024. [CrossRef]
- KHAN, F. et al. Advances of Natural Fibers Composites in Diverse Engineering Applications – A Review. Applications in Engineering Science, v. 18, 2024. [CrossRef]
- KUMAR, K. D. et al. Study the effect of fracture toughness on hybrid composite for automotive application. Materials Today Proceedings, v. 92, 2023. [CrossRef]
- MANSOR, M.R; NURFAIZEY, A.H.; TAMALDIN, N.; NORDIN, M.N.A. Natural fiber polymer composites: Utilization in aerospace engineering. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Composites Science and Engineering. Biomass, Biopolymer-Based Materials, and Bioenergy. Woodhead Publishing. Cambridge. 2019..
- TULI, N. T.; KHATUN, S.; RASHID, A. B. Unlocking the future of precision manufacturing: A comprehensive exploration of 3D printing with fiber-reinforced composites in aerospace, automotive, medical, and consumer industries. Heliyon, 2024. [CrossRef]
- SANTOS, C. M. et al. A Bibliometric Review on Applications of Lignocellulosic Fibers in Polymeric and Hybrid Composites: Trends and Perspectives. Heliyon, v. 10, 2024. [CrossRef]
- RAFIEE, K. et al. Biodegradable green composites: It’s never too late to mend. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, v. 30, p. 100482–100482, 1 ago. 2021. [CrossRef]
- MUNIYASAMY, S; DADA, O. 2021. Recycling of plastics and composites materials and degradation technologies for bioplastics and biocomposites. Waste Management in the Fashion and Textile Industries: The Textile Institute Book Series. [CrossRef]
- EL KINANI, K. et al. Interdisciplinary analysis of wind energy - a focus on France. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, v. 55, p. 102944, 1 fev. 2023. [CrossRef]
- AHRENS, A. et al. Catalytic disconnection of C–O bonds in epoxy resins and composites. Nature, p. 1–8, 26 abr. 2023. [CrossRef]
- UPPAL, N. et al. Cellulosic fibres-based epoxy composites: From bioresources to a circular economy. Industrial Crops and Products. Aug;182: 114895. Epub, 2022. [CrossRef]
- ISO 4787 – Laboratory Glass and Plastic Ware – Volumetric Instruments – Methods for testing of capacity and use. 2021.
- ISO 179-1 – Plastic Determination of Charpy Impact Properties, part 1: Non-instrumented Impact Test. 2010.
- MACHADO, M. V. F. et al. Ensaios de Impacto em Compósitos Epóxi com Média e Alta Frações Volumétricas Teóricas de Tecido de Rami e uma Análise de Fraturas à Luz do Princípio de Hamilton. ABM Proceedings, p. 321–332, 2024.
- ASTM-G53/154 – Standard Practice for Operating Fluorescent Light Apparatus for UV Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials. 2017.
- ASTM D 5208 - Standard Practice for Fluorescent Ultraviolet (UV) Exposure of Photodegradable Plastics. 2022.
- ADEXIM-COMEXIM – Correlação Entre o Tempo Real de Intemperismo e a Ação do Sistema C-UV com Base na ASTM-G53/154. 2000.
- WU, X. et al. Fracture process zone and fracture energy of heterogeneous soft materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, p. 105997, 2024. [CrossRef]
- HOSSEIN IZADI, S. M.; FAKOOR, M.; MIRZAVAND, B. A novel mixed mode fracture criterion for functionally graded materials considering fracture process zone. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, v. 134, 2024. [CrossRef]
- POP, I. O. et al. A new approach for fracture process zone evaluation. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, v. 132, 2024. [CrossRef]
- OSHIMA, S. et al. Mesoscale mechanism of damage in fracture process zone of CFRP laminates simulated with triaxial stress state-dependent constitutive equation of matrix resin. Composites Science and Technology, v. 257, 2024. [CrossRef]
- MAGHAMI, A. et al. Bulk and fracture process zone contribution to the rate-dependent adhesion amplification in viscoelastic broad-band materials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, v. 193, 2024. [CrossRef]
- CHU, P. et al. Anisotropic fracture behavior and corresponding fracture process zone of laminated shale through three-point bending tests. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2024. [CrossRef]
- NIE, Y.; LI, D.; LUO, Q. A multiscale nonlinear fracture model for staggered composites to reveal the toughening effect of process zone. Composites Science and Technology, v. 241, 2023. [CrossRef]
- XU, X.; TAKEDA, S.; WISNOM, M. R. Investigation of fracture process zone development in quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy laminates using in situ and ex situ X-ray Computed Tomography. Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing, v. 166, 2023. [CrossRef]
- LIU, X.; ZHANG, H.; LUO, S. Size effect model of nominal tensile strength with competing mechanisms between maximum defect and fracture process zone (CDF model) for quasi-brittle materials. Construction and Building Materials, v. 399, p. 132538–132538, 23 jul. 2023. [CrossRef]
- SCOTT, D. A. et al. Fracture process zone characterizations of multi-scale fiber reinforced cementitious composites. Construction and Building Materials, v. 408, p. 133713–133713, 14 out. 2023. [CrossRef]
- SU, H.; WANG, L.; CHEN, B. A phase-field framework for modeling multiple cohesive fracture behaviors in laminated composite materials. Composite Structures, v. 347, 2024. [CrossRef]
- QU, Z.; ZHAO, C.; AN, L. A micromechanics perspective on the intralaminar and interlaminar damage mechanisms of composite laminates considering ply orientation and loading condition. Composite Structures, v. 347, 2024. [CrossRef]
- FERREIRA, L. M.; COELHO, C. A. C. P.; REIS, P. N. B. Numerical predictions of intralaminar and interlaminar damage in thin composite shells subjected to impact loads. Thin-Walled Structures, v. 192, 2023. [CrossRef]
- AO, W. et al. Finite element method of a progressive intralaminar and interlaminar damage model for woven fibre laminated composites under low velocity impact. Materials & Design, v. 223, 2022. [CrossRef]
- HE, R. et al. Dynamic tensile intralaminar fracture and continuum damage evolution of 2D woven composite laminates at high loading rate. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, p. 104731–104731, 1 out. 2024. [CrossRef]
- HU, P. et al. An experimental study on the influence of intralaminar damage on interlaminar delamination properties of laminated composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, v. 131, 2020. [CrossRef]
- RUSSO, A.; PALUMBO, C.; RICCIO, A. The role of intralaminar damages on the delamination evolution in laminated composite structures. Heliyon, v. 9, n. 4, 2023. [CrossRef]
- TAN, W. et al. The role of interfacial properties on the intralaminar and interlaminar damage behaviour of unidirectional composite laminates: Experimental characterization and multiscale modelling. v. 138, p. 206–221, 2018. [CrossRef]
- ESPADAS-ESCALANTE, J. J.; VAN DIJK, N. P.; ISAKSSON, P. The effect of free-edges and layer shifting on intralaminar and interlaminar stresses in woven composites. Composite Structures, v. 185, p. 212–220, 2018. [CrossRef]
- NAYA, F.; PAPPAS, G.; BOTSIS, J. Micromechanical study on the origin of fiber bridging under interlaminar and intralaminar mode I failure. Composite Structures, v. 210, p. 877–891, 2019. [CrossRef]
- DE MOURA, M. F. S. F. et al. Interlaminar and intralaminar fracture characterization of composites under mode I loading. Composite Structures, v. 92, n. 1, p. 144–149, 2010. [CrossRef]
- FISHER, J.; CZABAJ, M. W. A new test for characterization of interlaminar tensile strength of tape-laminate composites. Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing, v. 176, p. 107868–107868, 26 out. 2023. [CrossRef]












| Test | 40% | 50% | 60% |
| Number of plies | Number of plies | Number of plies | |
| Charpy | 70 | 87 | 105 |
| %Volfiber | Energy (J) | Notch Toughness (J/m) | Impact Strength (kJ/m²) |
| 40% | 1,28 0,35 | 139,91 37,67 | 21,83 6,08 |
| 50% | 1,48 0,36 | 158,53 36,10 | 24,45 4,59 |
| 60% | 3,86 1,87 | 414,09 200,24 | 49,67 25,44 |
| 40% | 50% | 60% | |
| 40% | 0,2423 | 0,0002812 | |
| 50% | 0,2423 | 0,0146 | |
| 60% | 0,0002812 | 0,0146 |
| %Volfiber | Energy (J) | Notch Toughness (J/m) | Impact Strength (kJ/m²) |
| 40% | 2,31 0,77 | 231,11 76,60 | 27,62 7,25 |
| 50% | 3,54 0,61 | 354,40 61,12 | 46,11 6,59 |
| 60% | 4,55 1,18 | 455,00 118,22 | 56,47 11,55 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).