Submitted:
02 December 2024
Posted:
03 December 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Area
4.2. Field sampling
4.3. Foliar herbivory
4.4. Quantification of foliar silicon content
4.5. Data analysis
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Ethics approval
Consent to participate
Consent for publication
References
- Poelman, E.H.; Kessler, A. Keystone herbivores and the evolution of plant defenses. Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21(6), 477-485. [CrossRef]
- Zangerl, A.R. Evolution of induced plant responses to herbivores. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2003, 4(1), 91-103. [CrossRef]
- Dirzo, R.; Boege, K. Patterns of herbivory and defense in tropical dry and rain forests. In Tropical Forest Community Ecology; Carson, W.P., Schnitzer, S.A., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: West-Sussex, United Kingdom, 2008, pp. 63-78. Available online: https://propedeuticoecologiatropical10.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/tropical-forest-community-ecology.pdf (accessed on 14-11-2024).
- Gong, B.; Zhang, G. Interactions between plants and herbivores: A review of plant defense. Acta Ecol Sinica. 2014, 34(6), 325-336. [CrossRef]
- Salgado-Luarte, C.; González-Teuber, M.; Madriaza, K.; Gianoli, E. Trade-off between plant resistance and tolerance to herbivory: mechanical defenses outweigh chemical defenses. Ecology. 2023, 104(1), e3860. [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, G.W. Hypersensitivity: a neglected plant resistance mechanism against insect herbivores. Environ. Entomol. 1990, 19(5), 1173-1182. [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, G.W.; Negreiros, D. The occurrence and effectiveness of hypersensitive reaction against galling herbivores across host taxa. Ecol. Entomol. 2001, 26(1), 46-55. [CrossRef]
- Andrade, J.F., Calixto, E.S., Demetrio, G.R., Venâncio, H., Meiado, M.V., de Santana, D.G., Cuevas-Reyes, P.; Almeida, W.R.; Santos, J.C. Tolerance mitigates gall effects when susceptible plants fail to elicit induced defense. Plants. 2024, 13(11), 1472. [CrossRef]
- Debona, D.; Rodrigues, F.A.; Datnoff, L.E. Silicon’s role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017. 55(1), 85-107. [CrossRef]
- Coskun, D.; Deshmukh, R.; Sonah, H.; Menzies, J.G.; Reynolds, O.; Ma, J.F.; Kronzucker, H.J.; Bélanger, R.R. The controversies of silicon’s role in plant biology. New Phytol., 2019, 221, 67-85. [CrossRef]
- Leroy, N.; de Tombeur, F.; Walgraffe, Y.; Cornélis, J.T.; Verheggen, F.J. Silicon and plant natural defenses against insect pests: impact on plant volatile organic compounds and cascade effects on multitrophic interactions. Plants. 2019, 8, 444. [CrossRef]
- Reynolds, O.L.; Padula, M.P.; Zeng, R.; Gurr, G.M. Silicon: potential to promote direct and indirect effects on plant defense against arthropod pests in agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 744. [CrossRef]
- Keeping, M.G.; Kvedaras, O.L. Silicon as a plant defence against insect herbivory: response to Massey, Ennos and Hartley. J Anim. Ecol. 2008, 77(3), 631-633. [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Kumar, A.; Hartley, S.; Singh, I.K. Silicon: its ameliorative effect on plant defense against herbivory. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71(21), 6730-6743. [CrossRef]
- Johnson, S.N.; Rowe, R.C.; Hall, C.R. Silicon is an inducible and effective herbivore defence against Helicoverpa punctigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in soybean. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2020, 110(3), 417-422. [CrossRef]
- Johnson, S.; Waterman, J.; Hartley, S.; Cooke, J.; Ryalls, J.; Lagisz, M.; Nakagawa, S. Plant silicon defences suppress herbivore performance, but mode of feeding is key. Ecol. Lett. 2024, 27, e14519. [CrossRef]
- Klotz, M.; Schaller, J.; Engelbrecht, B.M. Silicon-based anti-herbivore defense in tropical tree seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1250868. [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Han, Y.; Li, P.; Li, F.; Ali, S.; Hou, M. Silicon amendment is involved in the induction of plant defense responses to a phloem feeder. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4232. [CrossRef]
- Cornelissen, T.G. Fernandes, G.W. Patterns of attack by herbivores on the tropical shrub Bauhinia brevipes (Leguminosae): Vigour or chance?. Eur. J. Entomol. 2001, 98 (1), 37-40. [CrossRef]
- Cornelissen, T.; Fernandes, G.W.; Coelho, M.S. Induced responses in the neotropical shrub Bauhinia brevipes Vogel: does early season herbivory function as cue to plant resistance?. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2011, 5, 245-253. [CrossRef]
- Marinho, C.R.; Oliveira, R.B.; Teixeira, S. P. The uncommon cavitated secretory trichomes in Bauhinia ss (Fabaceae): the same roles in different organs. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 180(1), 104-122. [CrossRef]
- Andrade, J.F.; Batista, J.C.; Pereira, H.S.; Fernandes, G.W.; Santos, J.C. Fire mediated herbivory and plant defense of a neotropical shrub. Arthropod-Plant Inte. 2019, 13, 489-498. [CrossRef]
- Santos, J.C.; Silveira, F.A.O.; Fernandes, G.W. Long term oviposition preference and larval performance of Schizomyia macrocapillata (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on larger shoots of its host plant Bauhinia brevipes (Fabaceae). Evol. Ecol. 2008, 22, 123–137. [CrossRef]
- Santos, J.C.; Alves-Silva, E.; Cornelissen, T.G.; Fernandes, G.W. Differences in leaf nutrients and developmental instability in relation to induced resistance to a gall midge. Arthropod-Plant Interact. 2017, 11, 163–170. [CrossRef]
- Vandegeer, R.K.; Cibils-Stewart, X.; Wuhrer, R.; Hartley, S.E.; Tissue, D.T.; Johnson, S.N. Leaf silicification provides herbivore defence regardless of the extensive impacts of water stress. Funct. Ecol. 2021, 35(6), 1200-1211. [CrossRef]
- Waterman, J.M.; Cibils-Stewart, X.; Cazzonelli, C.I.; Hartley, S.E.; Johnson, S.N. Short-term exposure to silicon rapidly enhances plant resistance to herbivory. Ecology 2021, 102(9), e03438. [CrossRef]
- Bhavanam, S.; Stout, M.J. Assessment of Silicon- and mycorrhizae- mediated constitutive and induced systemic resistance in rice, Oryza sativa L., against the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda Smith. Plants 2021, 10, 2126. [CrossRef]
- Alhousari, F.; Greger, M. Silicon and mechanisms of plant resistance to insect pests. Plants 2018, 7, 33. [CrossRef]
- Frew, A.; Weston, L.A.; Reynolds, O.L.; Gurr, G.M. The role of silicon in plant biology: a paradigm shift in research approach. Ann. Bot. 2018, 121(7), 1265-1273. [CrossRef]
- Acevedo, F.E.; Peiffer, M.; Ray, S.; Tan, C.W.; Felton, G.W. Silicon-Mediated Enhancement of Herbivore Resistance in Agricultural Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 631824. [CrossRef]
- Espírito-Santo, M.M.; Fernandes, G. W. How many species of gall-inducing insects are there on earth, and where are they?. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2007, 100(2), 95-99. [CrossRef]
- Cintra, F.C.F.; Araújo, W.S.D.; Maia, V.C.; Guimarães, M.V.U.; Venâncio, H.; Andrade, J.F.; Carneiro, M.A.A.; Almeida, W.R.; Santos, J.C. Plant-galling insect interactions: a data set of host plants and their gall-inducing insects for the Cerrado. Ecology 2020, 101(11), e03149. [CrossRef]
- Massad, T.J. Plant defences as functional traits: A comparison across savannas differing in herbivore specialization. J. Ecol. 2023, 111(12), 2552-2567. [CrossRef]
- Santos, J.C.; Maldonado-López, Y.; Venâncio, H.; Almeida, W.R.; Felício, D.T.; Cintra, F.C.F.; Barros, L.O.; Reis, R.A.; Moreira, T.R.; Costa-Silva, V.M.; Cuevas-Reyes, P. Interspecific competition drives gall-inducing insect species distribution on leaves of Matayba guianensis Aubl. (Sapindaceae). Ecol. Entomol. 2021, 46, 1059-1071. [CrossRef]
- Nyman, T.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R. Manipulation of the phenolic chemistry of willows by gall-inducing sawflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97(24), 13184-13187. [CrossRef]
- Kuster, V.C.; Rezende, U.C.; Cardoso, J.C.F.; Isaias, R.M.S., Oliveira, D.C. How Galling Organisms Manipulate the Secondary Metabolites in the Host Plant Tissues? A histochemical overview in Neotropical gall systems. In Co-Evolution of Secondary Metabolites, Reference Series in Phytochemistry; Mérillon, J.M., Ramawat, K., Eds., Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 823-842. [CrossRef]
- Hartley, S. The chemical composition of plant galls: are levels of nutrients and secondary compounds controlled by the gall-former?. Oecologia, 1998, 113, 492–501. [CrossRef]
- Johnson, S.N.; Hartley, S.E.; Ryalls, J.M.W.; Frew, A.; Hall, C.R. Targeted plant defense: Silicon conserves hormonal defense signaling impacting chewing but not fluid-feeding herbivores. Ecology 2021, 102(3), e03250.
- Giron, D.; Huguet, E.; Stone, G.N.; Body, M. Insect-induced effects on plants and possible effectors used by galling and leaf-mining insects to manipulate their host-plant. J. Insect Physiol. 2016, 84, 70-89. [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Hua, H.; Zhu, Y.G.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, C.; Römheld, V. Importance of plant species and external silicon concentration to active silicon uptake and transport. New Phytol. 2006, 172(1), 63-72. [CrossRef]
- Pontigo, S.; Ribera, A.; Gianfreda, L.; Mora, M.L.; Nikolic, M.; Cartes, P. Silicon in vascular plants: uptake, transport and its influence on mineral stress under acidic conditions. Planta 2015, 242, 23–37. [CrossRef]
- Murali-Baskaran, R.K.; Senthil-Nathan, S.; Hunter, W.B. Anti-herbivore activity of soluble silicon for crop protection in agriculture: a review. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2021, 28(3), 2626-2637. [CrossRef]
- Gonçalves, R.V.S.; Raupp, P.P.; Cardoso, J.C.F.; Oliveira, D.C. Dinâmica de vegetação e caracterização das fitofisionomias da Reserva Ecológica do Panga, In Aspectos da história natural da Reserva Ecológica do Panga, 1 ed.; Jacobucci, G.B.; Oliveira, P.E.; Costa, A.N. Orgs. 2023; UFU: Uberlândia, MG, pp. 190-199. Available online: https://ufubr-my.sharepoint.com/personal/ecologia_umuarama_ufu_br/_layouts/15/onedrive.aspx?id=%2Fpersonal%2Fecologia%5Fumuarama%5Fufu%5Fbr%2FDocuments%2FPPGECB%2FSECRETARIA%2FCURSO%20DE%20CAMPO%2F2023%20ASPECTOS%20DA%20HIST%C3%93RIA%20NATURAL%20DA%20RESERVA%20ECOL%C3%93GICA%20DO%20PANGA%202023%2Epdf&parent=%2Fpersonal%2Fecologia%5Fumuarama%5Fufu%5Fbr%2FDocuments%2FPPGECB%2FSECRETARIA%2FCURSO%20DE%20CAMPO&ga=1 (accessed on 22-11-2024).
- Moreno, M.I.C.; Schiavini, I. Relação entre vegetação e solo em um gradiente florestal na Estação Ecológica do Panga, Uberlândia (MG). Braz. J. Bot. 2001, 24, 537-544. [CrossRef]
- Silveira, F.A.O; Santos, J.C; Franceschinelli, E.V; Morellato, L.P.C; Fernandes, G.W. Costs and benefits of reproducing under unfavorable conditions: an integrated view of ecological and physiological constraints in a cerrado shrub. Plant Ecol. 2015, 216, 963-974. [CrossRef]
- Hanley, M.E.; Lamont, B.B.; Fairbanks, M.M.; Rafferty, C. M. Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defense. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 8(4), 157-178. [CrossRef]
- Santos-Silva, J.; Araujo, T. J. Are Fabaceae the principal super-hosts of galls in Brazil?. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2020, 92, 436 e20181115. [CrossRef]
- Maia, V.C.; Fernandes, G.W. Two new species of Asphondyliini (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) associated with Bauhinia brevipes (Fabaceae) in Brazil. Zootaxa. 2005, 1091(1), 27–40. [CrossRef]
- Fernandes G.W.; Cornelissen T.G.; Lara T.A.F.; Isaias R.M.S. Plants fight gall formation: hypersensitivity. Ciênc. Cult. 2000, 52, 49-54.
- Korndörfer, G.G.; Pereira, H.S.; Nola, A. Análise de silício: solo, planta e fertilizante; ICIAG-UFU: Uberlândia, Brazil, 2004, 34p.
- Revelle, W. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. Northwestern University: Evanston, Illinois. R package version 2.4.3, 2024. Available on: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
- Lefcheck, J.S. piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modeling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Met. Ecol. Evol. 2016, 7(5), 573-579. [CrossRef]
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. 2023. Available on: https://www.R-project.org/.
- H. Wickham. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: Verlag, New York, 2016.




| Response Variable | Source of Variation | Estimate | Std. Error | t Value | P Value | R² |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of HR reactions |
Intercept | 1.579 | 1.017 | 1.553 | 0.1261 | - |
| Mean silicon content |
15.587 | 7.568 | 2.060 | 0.0441 | 0.97 | |
| Herbivory rate (%) |
Intercept | 9.220 | 2.772 | 3.326 | 0.0015 | - |
| Mean silicon content |
-52.621 | 21.649 | -2.431 | 0.0183 | 0.09 |
| Comparison | Estimate | Std. Error | z Value | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gall versus healthy leaves | 0.014 | 0.008 | 1.75 | 0.297 |
| Gall-bearing leaves versus Healthy leaves | 0.04 | 0.008 | 5.00 | < 0.001 |
| Leaves with HR versus Healthy leaves | 0.036 | 0.008 | 4.50 | <0.001 |
| Gall-bearing leaves versus Gall | 0.026 | 0.008 | 3.25 | <0.01 |
| Leaves with HR versus Gall | 0.022 | 0.008 | 2.75 | <0.05 |
| Source of Variation | Estimate | Std. Error | z Value | P Value | R² |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.741 | 0.072 | 24.185 | < 0.001 | - |
| Herbivory rate (%) | -0.063 | 0.021 | -3.012 | 0.002 | 0.16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).