Submitted:
15 November 2024
Posted:
18 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
To asses Impact of the informal seed system on the production of the malt barley in Ethiopia. The study purposefully selected seed samples from each of the two zones, Awi and South Gondar, using 60 sample homes and farmers. From every sample, 1000 g of malted barley seeds were taken for investigation of seed quality. The results indicate that Farmers mostly choose their seeds based on seed size (15. 23%), marketability (21.42%), and color (48.47%). The study revealed that the most common source of seeds was their saved stock. In the south Gondar zone, 2.7% of smallholder farmers sourced seeds from the integrated seed system, 9.3% from the formal seed system, and 88% through the informal seed system. For Traveller, Ibon, Holker, and Fatima, the seed moisture content was within and below the Ethiopian seed standard of 11.35, 17.35, 14.0, and 12.1, respectively. These imply that standard germination varied significantly between the seed samples. Moreover, the national seed specifications were met by the average germination percentage. There were notable differences in each sample's germination rate, shoot and root lengths, seedling dry weight, and vigor index 1. formal seed systems should be crucial for improving the malted barley seed system.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Description of the Study Area
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Survey and Sampling
3.2. Seed Sampling and Testing
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Seed System Survey Findings
4.2. Social Capital Linkage and NGOs’ Role in Seed Support

4.3. Seed Management and Producing Practice
4.4. Ethiopian Malt Barley Distribution and Basic Seed Production Actors and Links
4.5. Quality Performance of Malt Barley Seeds from Different Seed Sources
5. Discussion
5.1. Formal Seed Suppliers and Distribution System
5.2. Informal Seed System
6. Conclusion
Data availability
Acknowledgments
Conflict of interest
References
- Andargie, Y. E. (2021). Malt barley seed supply system.
- Ariga, J., Mabaya, E., Waithaka, M. & Wanzala-Mlobela, M. (2019). Improved agricultural technologies spur a green revolution in Africa? A multicountry analysis of seed and fertilizer delivery systems. The journal of the International Association of Agricultural Economists. 50, 63–74. [CrossRef]
- Berhanu, B., Fekadu, A., & Berhane, L., (2005). Food barley in Ethiopia. In: Grando, S., Gomez, H. (Eds.), Food Barley: Importance, Uses and Local Knowledge. Proceedings of the international Workshop on Food Barley Improvement. pp. 53–82, ICARDA, Hammamet.
- Bishaw, Z. (2004). Wheat and Barley Seed Systems in Ethiopia and Syria Systems in Ethiopia and Syria.
- Bishaw, Z. & Tiruneh, A. M. (2020). Deployment of Malt Barley Technologies In Ethiopia Achievements and Lessons Learned. Lebanon: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA). Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11766/12906.
- Bizuneh,W. F & Abebe, D. A.(2019). Malt Barley (Hordeum distichon L.) varieties performance evaluation in North Shewa, Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(8), 503-508. [CrossRef]
- CSA (Central Statistical Agency). (2020). Agricultural Sample Survey. Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics. Volume II. Statistical Bulletin 587. Addis Ababa, 9-11.
- CTA. (2014). Seed System, Science and Policy in East and Central Africa. Available online: https://publications.cta.int.
- Ebone, L. A., & Gonçalves, I. M. (2019). Accelerated aging test and image analysis for barley seed, AJCS, 13(09):1546-1551.
- FAO. (2004). Summary of world food and agricultural statistics. Available online: https://www.fao.org/.
- Fessel, S. A. (2003). Avaliação da qualidade física, fisiológica e sanitária de sementes de milho durante o beneficiamento. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 25(2). 70-76. [CrossRef]
- ISTA. (1996). International Rules for Seed Testing. Seed Science and Technology, 13, 299-513.
- Kassie, M., & Tesfaye, K., (2019). Malting barley grain quality and yield response to nitrogen fertilization in the Arsi highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 22 (3), 225–234. [CrossRef]
- Kebede,W. M., Koye, A. D., Mussa, E. C, Daniel T. Kebede,D.T. (2017). The Roles of Institutions for Malt-Barley Production in Smallholder Farming System: The Case of Wegera District, Northwest Ethiopia. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 7(1): 7-12.
- Maredia, M., Howard, J., Boughton, D., Naseem, A. & Wanzala, M. (1999). Increasing Seed System Efficiency in Africa: Concepts, Strategies and issues. MSU International Development Working Papers 77, Michigan.
- Pinto, C. A. G, Carvalho, M. L. M., Andrade, D. B., Leite, E. R., & Chalfoun, I. (2015). Image analysis in the evaluation of the physiological potential of maize seeds. Rev Cienc Agron. 46:319-328. [CrossRef]
- Taro, Y. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory analysis. Harper and row.
- Terefe, D., Desalegn, T., & Ashagre, H. (2018). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer levels on grain yield and quality of malt barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties at Wolmera District, Central Highland of Ethiopia. Available online: https://www.joseheras.com/.
- Ukaid. (2018). Assessment of the Malting Barley Market System in Ethiopia. Available online: https://beamexchange.org.


| Zone (Amhara) | Household sex distribution in Awi and S/Gondar | ||||||
| Male | Female | Total | |||||
| Awi |
Districts | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % |
| Anksha | 52 | 83.87 | 10 | 16.13 | 62 | 100 | |
| Banja | 44 | 72.13 | 17 | 27.87 | 61 | 100 | |
| Guagusa | 61 | 82.43 | 13 | 17.56 | 74 | 100 | |
| Total | 157 | 79.38 | 40 | 20.52 | 197 | 100 | |
| S/Gondar |
Districts |
Male | Female | Total | |||
| Frequency | % | Frequency | % | Frequency | % | ||
| Farta | 61 | 84.7 | 11 | 15.27 | 72 | 100 | |
| L/Gaynt | 79 | 82.3 | 17 | 17.7 | 96 | 100 | |
| Estie | 107 | 83.6 | 21 | 16.4 | 128 | 100 | |
| Total | 247 | 83.57 | 49 | 16.46 | 296 | 100 | |
| Variable | Number of respondents | Mean | SD | Min | max |
| Age of household head /year/ | 5236 | 47.6 | 4.25 | 20 | 75 |
| Family size /number/ | 662 | 5.36 | 1.08 | 2 | 13 |
| Farming experience in main season/year/ | 662 | 20 | 1.93 | 0 | 57 |
| Farming experience within irrigation season /year/ | 662 | 11.5 | 2.23 | 0 | 35 |
| Types of zones | Numbers and membership in social institutions | Participation | Continue membership | ||
| Member of respondents | % | Member of respondents | % | ||
| S/Gondar zone Awi zone |
Seed producer cooperatives /member/ | 1044 | 8.03 | 800 | 6.15 |
| LSB /members/ | 1231 | 9.5 | 785 | 6.06 | |
| NGOs /numbers/ | 6 | 83 | 4 | 67 | |
| Unions /members/ | 25 | 84 | 5 | 16.8 | |
| Seed producer cooperatives /member/ | 2849 | 20.2 | 2451 | 17.38 | |
| LSB /members/ | 3100 | 21.9 | 2679 | 18.92 | |
| NGOs /numbers/ | 4 | 65 | 4 | 65 | |
| Seed selection charitarian | No of participant | % |
| Seed color | 4847 | 48.47 |
| Early maturity | 738 | 7.38 |
| Seed size | 1523 | 15.23 |
| Marketability | 2142 | 21.42 |
| Uniformity | 530 | 5.3 |
| Growth habit | 200 | 2 |
| Insect pest resistance | 20 | 0.2 |
| Treatments | Parameters of treatments | |||||||||
| RDWT (gm) |
SDWT (gm) | RL (cm) |
SL (cm) |
SG | VIG 1 % | VIG 2 | SPG | EM | MC % | |
| Travller | 4.5a | 1.5a | 16.5a | 31.5a | 93.5b | 21.97a | 92.99a | 97.0a | 94.5a | 11.35c |
| Ibon | 4.3a | 1.8a | 12.5b | 26.0bc | 90.0bc | 18.22b | 114.4a | 89.5bc | 86.5b | 17.35a |
| Holker | 3.7a | 0.8b | 10.5c | 26.0c | 89.0c | 16.24c | 43.77a | 86.0c | 92.0a | 14.0b |
| Fatina | 0.85b | 0.35c | 15.5a | 29.5ab | 98.0a | 22.05a | 34.36a | 94.5ab | 94.0a | 12.1c |
| Mean | 5.67 | 0.86 | 15.17 | 10.83 | 33.13 | 16.559 | 29.66 | 48.833 | 26.83 | 14.33 |
| LSD | 2.2246 | 1.4466 | 3.6748 | 3.8977 | 4.9898 | 2.2585 | 126.48 | 5.5122 | 11.176 | 2.0336 |
| CV | 20.999 | 8.275 | 8.5533 | 4.2599 | 1.6927 | 3.61720 | 5.679 | 1.88779 | 3.7762 | 4.6643 |
| Sig | * | ** | ** | * | * | ** | ns | * | ** | ** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).