Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Exploring the Effectiveness of Supporting Dietary Weight Loss Interventions with Health Coaching and Telemonitoring: An Integrative Nutrition Approach

Submitted:

04 November 2024

Posted:

04 November 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

Health coaching and telemonitoring are both considered a growing healthcare strategy that focuses on a patient-centered motivational approach to support behavior change and enhance adherence to health goals including dietary interventions. This review aimed to define and de-scribe both health coaching and telemonitoring in weight management interventions, including a literature review on the effectiveness of incorporating health coaching and telemonitoring into di-etary weight loss interventions, addressing the ongoing global challenge of obesity and its asso-ciated health risks, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Traditional dietary interven-tions often yield initial weight loss, however sustaining these results remains difficult due to fac-tors associated with lifestyles and motivation. Health coaching offers a personalized support and guidance to help clients establish and maintain healthier habits by setting achievable foals and building self-efficacy and fostering accountability, whereas telemonitoring via digital tool such as mobile apps and wearable devices provided tracking dietary and health measures allowing continuous monitoring and self-awareness. Our review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the past decade confirms that combining health coaching with telemonitoring improves weight loss outcomes, enhance adherence to lifestyle changes and positively impact chronic con-dition markers such as blood pressure and HbA1C levels. These integrated interventions also show promise in boosting mental well-being and enhance the quality of life. Findings highlights the potential of such integrative approaches in creating a sustainable, accessible, and scalable weight management in particularly for individuals at risk of obesity related health issues. Future research should focus on optimizing health coaching and telemonitoring tools to accommodate diverse populations for a long-term adherence.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Obesity is still considered a major global burden, where rates are increasing over the past decades as seen in the world health statistics [1]. The WHO estimates that there are around 650 million people that are classified as obese, Furthermore, several health issues are associated with obesity which include diabetes[2], cardiovascular diseases [3] and certain cancers [4], highlighting the importance of conducting sustainable weight loss programs [5]. The main approach in weight loss programs involves dietary interventions, which aim to reduce caloric intakes micronutrition composition and metabolic health while evidence consistently supports the efficiency of dietary interventions in promoting short term weight reductions [6]. While these interventions have been showing effective weight reductions, long-term weight loss remains challenging for many individuals [7]. Numerous studies confirm the efficiency of dietary interventions in achieving initial weight loss. For instance, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has demonstrated that both calorie restriction and low carbohydrate diets can lead to clinically significant weight loss over short periods (3 to 6 months) [8,9]. Furthermore, intervention such as intermittent fasting and meal replacement have shown promise in specific populations, such as those with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance[10]. Studies also show that dietary interventions can improve cardiovascular markers such as cholesterol and blood pressure, blood glucose and overall metabolic health [11]. Thus, limitations and challenges have been defined in such interventions, despite the initial success. Firstly, adherence to dietary interventions often declines over time due to various factors, including lifestyle demands, food environment, and psychological factors such as stress or emotional eating [12]. Many individuals struggle to sustain restrictive diets or maintain weight loss once the intervention period ends [13]. This suggests that without continuous support, even individuals with string motivation may find it difficult to sustain in new eating patterns in long term weight management programs. Given these challenges, new research has been directed towards exploring new strategies to improve effectiveness of dietary interventions, among those strategies, are health coaching and telemonitoring, which have gained evident attention. Health coaching, which involves personalized guidance and motivation aims to facilitate behavior changes by addressing individuals’ barriers and fostering self-efficiency in dietary and lifestyle modifications [14]. Health coaches who may be dietitians, nurse or any trained wellness professional works closely with clients to set achievable goals, monitor progress and offer support as they enhance engagement to the weight loss program [15]. Telemonitoring on the other hand may also be considered a supportive strategy via digital health technologies, such as mobile apps, wearable devices and online platforms to monitor health metrics remotely. The method enables continuous tracking of dietary habits, physical activity and other health indicators allowing both clients and healthcare provides to assess progress and make a positive reflection on weight loss interventions due to continuous monitoring and motivation [16]. The integration of health coaching and telemonitoring into dietary interventions may offer promising approach for enhancing weight loss outcomes [17,18]. This literature examines the current evidence on the effectiveness of these combined strategies in supporting dietary weight loss interventions, with an emphasis on understanding their individual and synergistic impacts. By exploring studies on the standalone and combined roles of health coaching and telemonitoring, this review aims to clarify their potential as tools for facilitating sustained weight loss and improved health outcomes.

2. Materials and Methods

A comprehensive literature search was carried out using the keywords “RCT”, “weight loss”, “Diet”, “health coaching”, and “telemonitoring”. The selected strategy was directed towards defining/describing mechanisms of support systems to dietary interventions, which included health coaching and telemonitoring integrated in weight management intervention for weight loss and improving chronic conditions markers. We also aimed to provide a constructive analysis of (31) previous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) carried on health coaching and/or telemonitoring for weight management. Full texts of published articles were reviewed for the past 10 years (2014-2024) via PubMed and Google Scholar databases and duplicate articles were excluded from the research findings.

3. Results

3.1. Health Coaching as a Support for Weight Loss Interventions

Health coaching is an emerging strategy in healthcare that emphasize a patient-centered, motivational approach to facilitate behaviors change and improve adherence to health-related goals. In the context of dietary weight loss interventions, health coaching services as a form of structures support that helps individuals develop and maintain sustainable dietary habits, overcome barriers to change, and improve their confidence in managing their health. Studies have showing that health coaching has consistently demonstrated positive impact on dietary adherable , weight loss and lifestyles when compared to interventions without health coaching [19]. In the study 44 obese participants have enrolled being randomly divided into two groups health coaching group HC (n = 22) or control (n = 22) groups. By providing personalized guidance, health coaches can significantly enhance the effectiveness of dietary interventions where 15.7% of weight loss was seen in HC group compared to 2.5% seen in control group for a total of 12 weeks. Health Coaching is an effective approach that integrates formal education with health treatment in weight loss journey. Yet more randomized studies are required to confirm its impact on chronic disease markers [20]. In addition to the cost that may encounter hiring health coaches, specifically in low-source settings or for individuals without comprehensive health insurance coverage additionally, the effectiveness of health coaching may vary fur to coaches training and client-coach relationships and individuals differences in motivation and readiness for a change [21,22]. There are several mechanisms that are involved in health coaching which is described in three steps [23];
-
Goal setting and personalization enable clients to set realistic, achievable goals that align with improving their lifestyles to be able to lose weight.
-
Motivational support and self-efficiency help clients overcome struggle sand build confidence in their ability to adhere to dietary changes. Coaches use motivational interviewing to encourage clients to expose reasons for wanting to lose weight.
-
Behavior reinforming and accountability by providing regular feedback, encouragement, and reinforming, which may help client to adhere to their diet over a longer period of tie.
-
Problem solving and coping strategies by addressing obstacles to dietary adherence and finding suitable solutions for clients, which include emotional earing, social pressure or lack of meal planning skills.

3.2. Telemonitoring as a Support for Weight Loss Interventions

Telemonitoring refers to the use of digital health technologies that remotely monitor and manage health status. In weight loss interventions, telemonitoring acts as a tool to provide a continuous assessment for weight measures, dietary adherence and lifestyle changes such as physical activity. This approach is believed to enhance motivation through reflection and continuous monitoring. Numerous studies have examined the impact of telemonitoring on dietary adherence and weight loss outcome. In the Active Body Control Program ABC have shown significant impact on weight loss, which is a telemonitoring based program [24]. A systematic review have examined studies on self-monitoring or so called telemonitoring on diet, exercise and self-weighting from 1993 to 2009 showed that there is a strong link between self-monitoring and weight loss [25]. While Telemonitoring holds promise as a supportive tool in weight loss, it is not without challenges. Main limitation is the technical barrier and digital literacy [26], where it requires a specific level of familiarity with technology, which may be a struggle to the elderly [27], where it requires support of care givers or members of the family. Also access to smartphones or wearable devices may be expensive to be adapted as part of the routine [28]. Thus, engagers and sustainable users are considered major limitation, where literature have shown that clients respond to telemonitoring well at the initial period of the weight loss intervention and then with time, clients lose interest and motivation, where response rate becomes so low[29]. Mechanisms associated with such positive outcome include the following:
-
Continuous tracking and real-time feedback which enables clients to track their dietary and exercise behaviors daily as it creates a greater awareness of their eating patterns.
-
Data-driven personalization which allows personalized feedback and intervention adjustment. This enables health professionals and health coaches to monitor trends in the day as any changes that happen in physical activity for example results in tailored recommendation as well.
-
Support for long-term behaviors change which may establish health habits by making behaviors tracking a routine part of the day to day lives.

3.3. Integrative Approaches: Combining Health Coaching and Telemonitoring

Combining health coaching with telemonitoring represents a promising approach to improving the efficiency of dietary weight loss interventions. Each approach has a unique strength, where health coaching offers personalized guidance and motivational support, while telemonitoring provides continuous feedback and accountability. Together, these methods address both the behaviors and logistical barriers to sustained dietary adherence, making it easier for clients to implement and maintain dietary changes over time. According to previous research, promising outcomes have been revealed showing that an integrative approach supports weight loss for a longer period. A study have aimed to examine adherence to remote monitoring devised and weekly rate of weight loss (RWL) in a 12 week online weight management combined with weekly video based health coaching, showed a significantly greater weight loss compared to the control group [30]. Kepm et al (2019) have compared between the effect of a telemedical coaching (TMC) with or without telemonitoring on weight loss among occupational healthcare professionals in a three-armed randomised controlled trial. Results have showed significant support to weight reduction with an added improvements when both strategies are combined [17].

3.4. Effectiveness of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) Supported with Telemonitoring and Health Coaching on Weight Loss and Related Chronic Conditions Risk Factors

Table 1 demonstrates Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) conducted between 2014-2024 to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on weight loss and related risk factors. Studies have implemented different models such as telemedical support, mobile apps and self-monitoring tools. While populations across the studies also varied( prediabetic patients, type 2 diabetic patients, hypertension patients and obese patients and specific type of groups, which included pregnant women and young adults that are at higher risks of obesity). Duration times were between 12 weeks and 24 months. Short term interventions have focused on immediate outcomes, such as weight loss, waist circumference and dietary improvements, while long term interventions have measured improvements in chronic conditions such as blood pressure and HbA1c levels. Accordingly, we have divided our data to four categories:
-
Weight loss and physical activity, showing significant weight loss and increased physical activity particularly with using video conferencing, telehealth or app-based coaching.
-
Health and behavior markers, such as HBA1c, blood pressure and lifestyles factors (dietary adherence and sleep), were reported to be improved.
-
Diabetes and gestational health were shown in some studies to support blood glucose control and reduce neonatal complications.
-
Mental health and self-efficiency where some interventions showed an enhance life satisfaction, mood and self-efficiency, especially with those incorporating motivational interviewing and coaching support.

Discussion

Among all the reviewed studies, the 12-week telehealth-based weight loss program using conferencing health coaching had the highest weight loss rate, where significant average weight loss of 7.3 kg (about 7.16% of body weight), compared to 1.2kg in the control group, with 69% of participant achieving clinically significant weight loss. The weight loss rate was notably higher than other interventions in terms of percentage of body weight lost over a short period of time. This program highlights the effectiveness of frequent, structured video coaching sessions with health professionals in promoting substantial weight loss withing a short time frame [48]. This is explained due to the fact that health coaching has a strong impact on particioants’ motivation and commitment to follow a specific diet. According to a previous study, particioants who received health coaving have rated that program they joined is highly in motivation, concept, acceptance and feasability[60], including health coaching approaches in changing behaviour using different models, wuch as behaviour change techniques (BCTs), which has been proved previously to reduce HBA1C and risks of chronic diseases [61]. On the other hand, long term RCTs have shown more promising results not only with weight loss but also with other health measures. For example, when digital self-monitoring combined with regular coaching to improve diet, physical activity and health behavior, results revealed significant impacts not only on weight loss but also on blood pressure and HBA1c. [43]. Which is explained due to the involvement of self-monitoring component that support participant engagement and self-efficacy which are both critical for sustaining lifestyle changes. Yet, while the study demonstrates effective weight loss and health improvements, the reliance on digital self-monitoring may limit accessibility for individuals with lower technological literacy or limited access to devices [17,49,56]. Our latest reported RCt was a pilot Telenutrition weight loss program, which was conducted between 2022 and 2023 have introduced an innovative health coaching model called “Integrative Nutrition” approach, which was provided on a monthly basis by an integrative nutrition health coach to tackle component of the circle of life [62]. This approach was never tracked before, where only weight and health metrics are commonly tracked in telemonitoring. Eid et al (2024), developed, validated and translated a new tool to assess the “Circle of Life” satisfaction levels, providing insight into the challenges that participants face in adhering to dietary interventions [63]. The pilot study outcomes were shared in the Clinical Nutrition ESPEN congress in Milan [64], where significant improvements were seen in weight, BMI, waist circumference and overall life satisfaction. Additionally, participants showed an enhanced general nutrition knowledge compared to the control group, in particularyly in weight management and diet related diseases, alongside with improving the quality of life with significant reductions in anxiety levels, a factor contributing to improving wellbeing [57,58,59]. Accordingly, the research team run by Eid, et al ( 2024) have designed a novel weight loss program, a 6-month Telenutrition weight loss program supported by weekly telemonitoring and monthly integrative nutrition health coaching that targets obese and overweight adults, for weight loss and improving health and wellbeing by assessing the general nutrition knowledge, eating behaviors, Sensory modalities and hunger, and stress [65]. Still, several limitations have been identified in the pilot study, where the small sample size was the major limitation, where a large sample size is necessary to have more reliable results.
To maximize the effectiveness and feasibility of combined health coaching and telemonitoring interventions, several strategies are considered by Integration with primary care, where both health coaching and telemonitoring may improve accessibility and reduce costs on clients. Also Tailored intervention design that consider preferences, access to technology and readiness for change can enhance adherence and engagement. Thus, focusing on sustainability to ensure long-term success is key for weight management achievement. Overall, an integrative approach offers a powerful tool as evident in the literature for weight loss interventions by addressing both behaviors and practical barriers. There are several measures that must be considered in future research, such as adherence rate, behaviors change psychological measures, biometric and clinical markers. Several strengths were identified in the reviwe, which is worth mentioning such as the extended engagement in all interventions have been seen specially with programs that persisted for 12 months, which is essential in maintaining a behavior change. furthermore, technology-enhanced monitoring and use of digital platforms for telemonitoring provides real-time feedback, convenient tracing and increase accessibility for participants in remote and busy areas. Thus, interventions had diverse health targets which is applicable in telemedicine. While the integrative approach in weight loss programs showed promising outcomes, several limitations are identified in the literature such as technological barriers, cost of telemonitoring devices and digital platforms, and engagement challenges which is difficult to maintain over 12 months period without face to face communication as observed in the mHealth study [39].

5. Conclusions

In Conclusion, this review highlights the efficacy and adaptability of dietary weight loss interventions implemented through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Interventions incorporating telemonitoring and personalized health coaching have been seen to encounter a significant impact on weight loss, chronic conditions markers and mental health when compared to usual or traditional care. The diverse approaches across studies from shirt term, intensive weight reduction programs to long0term chronic condition management have demonstrated the benefits of tailoring interventions to participants needs, risk profiles, and access to resources. However, the effectiveness of these interventions often varies due to challenges in long term adherence technological access, and participant engagement, suggesting that sustained support is essential for lasting impact.

Funding

This research is funded by the Institutional Fund Projects under grant no. IFPRC-206-141-2020.

Acknowledgments

This research work was funded by Institutional Fund Projects under grant no (IFPRC-206-141-2020). Therefore, authors gratefully acknowledge technical and financial support from the Ministry of Education and King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest

References

  1. Data, A.D.f.i.D., World health statistics 2024: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals, W.H. Organization, Editor. 2024. p. 86.
  2. Hu, F.B.;Manson, J.E.;Stampfer, M.J.;Colditz, G.;Liu, S.;Solomon, C.G.;Willett, W.C. Diet, lifestyle, and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. New England journal of medicine. 2001, 345, 790-797. [CrossRef]
  3. Bogers, R.P.;Bemelmans, W.J.;Hoogenveen, R.T.;Boshuizen, H.C.;Woodward, M.;Knekt, P.;Van Dam, R.M.;Hu, F.B.;Visscher, T.L.;Menotti, A. Association of overweight with increased risk of coronary heart disease partly independent of blood pressure and cholesterol levels: a meta-analysis of 21 cohort studies including more than 300 000 persons. Archives of internal medicine. 2007, 167, 1720-1728. [CrossRef]
  4. Renehan, A.G.;Tyson, M.;Egger, M.;Heller, R.F.;Zwahlen, M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. The lancet. 2008, 371, 569-578. [CrossRef]
  5. Wing, R.R.;Hill, J.O. Successful weight loss maintenance. Annual review of nutrition. 2001, 21, 323-341. [CrossRef]
  6. Johnston, B.C.;Kanters, S.;Bandayrel, K.;Wu, P.;Naji, F.;Siemieniuk, R.A.;Ball, G.D.;Busse, J.W.;Thorlund, K.;Guyatt, G. Comparison of weight loss among named diet programs in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis. Jama. 2014, 312, 923-933. [CrossRef]
  7. Wing, R.R.;Phelan, S. Long-term weight loss maintenance. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2005, 82, 222S-225S. [CrossRef]
  8. Kazeminasab, F.;Miraghajani, M.;Khalafi, M.;Sakhaei, M.H.;Rosenkranz, S.K.;Santos, H.O. Effects of low-carbohydrate diets, with and without caloric restriction, on inflammatory markers in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2024, 1-16. [CrossRef]
  9. Gruberg, L.;Weissman, N.J.;Waksman, R.;Fuchs, S.;Deible, R.;Pinnow, E.E.;Ahmed, L.M.;Kent, K.M.;Pichard, A.D.;Suddath, W.O. The impact of obesity on the short-term andlong-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the obesity paradox? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2002, 39, 578-584.
  10. Guo, L.;Xi, Y.;Jin, W.;Yuan, H.;Qin, G.;Chen, S.;Zhang, L.;Liu, Y.;Cheng, X.;Liu, W. A 5: 2 Intermittent Fasting Meal Replacement Diet and Glycemic Control for Adults With Diabetes: The EARLY Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open. 2024, 7, e2416786-e2416786. [CrossRef]
  11. Elhayany, A.;Lustman, A.;Abel, R.;Attal-Singer, J.;Vinker, S. A low carbohydrate Mediterranean diet improves cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes control among overweight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 1-year prospective randomized intervention study. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2010, 12, 204-209. [CrossRef]
  12. Lang, A.;Froelicher, E.S. Management of overweight and obesity in adults: behavioral intervention for long-term weight loss and maintenance. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2006, 5, 102-114. [CrossRef]
  13. Machado, A.M.;Guimarães, N.S.;Bocardi, V.B.;da Silva, T.P.R.;do Carmo, A.S.;de Menezes, M.C.;Duarte, C.K. Understanding weight regain after a nutritional weight loss intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2022, 49, 138-153. [CrossRef]
  14. Wolever, R.Q.;Simmons, L.A.;Sforzo, G.A.;Dill, D.;Kaye, M.;Bechard, E.M.;Southard, M.E.;Kennedy, M.;Vosloo, J.;Yang, N. A systematic review of the literature on health and wellness coaching: defining a key behavioral intervention in healthcare. Global advances in health and medicine. 2013, 2, 38-57. [CrossRef]
  15. Blundell, J.;Gibbons, C.;Caudwell, P.;Finlayson, G.;Hopkins, M. Appetite control and energy balance: impact of exercise. Obesity reviews. 2015, 16, 67-76. [CrossRef]
  16. Steinberg, D.M.;Tate, D.F.;Bennett, G.G.;Ennett, S.;Samuel-Hodge, C.;Ward, D.S. The efficacy of a daily self-weighing weight loss intervention using smart scales and e-mail. Obesity. 2013, 21, 1789-1797. [CrossRef]
  17. Kempf, K.;Röhling, M.;Martin, S.;Schneider, M. Telemedical coaching for weight loss in overweight employees: a three-armed randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019, 9, e022242. [CrossRef]
  18. Castelnuovo, G.;Manzoni, G.M.;Cuzziol, P.;Cesa, G.L.;Corti, S.;Tuzzi, C.;Villa, V.;Liuzzi, A.;Petroni, M.L.;Molinari, E. TECNOB study: ad interim results of a randomized controlled trial of a multidisciplinary telecare intervention for obese patients with type-2 diabetes. Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health: CP & EMH. 2011, 7, 44. [CrossRef]
  19. Suminski, R.R.;Leonard, T.;Obrusnikova, I.;Kelly, K. The impact of health coaching on weight and physical activity in obese adults: a randomized control trial. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2024, 18, 233-242. [CrossRef]
  20. Muñoz Obino, K.F.;Aguiar Pereira, C.;Caron-Lienert, R.S. Coaching and barriers to weight loss: an integrative review. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity: Targets and therapy. 2016, 1-11. [CrossRef]
  21. Ammentorp, J.;Uhrenfeldt, L.;Angel, F.;Ehrensvärd, M.;Carlsen, E.B.;Kofoed, P.-E. Can life coaching improve health outcomes?–A systematic review of intervention studies. BMC health services research. 2013, 13, 1-11. [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, H.;Kennedy, G.A.;Stupans, I. Does the modality used in health coaching matter? A systematic review of health coaching outcomes. Patient preference and adherence. 2020, 1477-1492. [CrossRef]
  23. Langinkoski, A.;Hämäläinen, J.;Rapo, K.;Rinta, M.;Aroviita, P.;Venojärvi, M. Health Coaching 2.0: Redefining a Key Lifestyle Medicine Intervention, PrioMed Pilot Program Evaluation. medRxiv. 2024, 2024.06. 10.24308710. [CrossRef]
  24. Luley, C.;Blaik, A.;Reschke, K.;Klose, S.;Westphal, S. Weight loss in obese patients with type 2 diabetes: Effects of telemonitoring plus a diet combination–The Active Body Control (ABC) Program. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2011, 91, 286-292. [CrossRef]
  25. Burke, L.E.;Wang, J.;Sevick, M.A. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2011, 111, 92-102. [CrossRef]
  26. Liljeroos, M.;Arkkukangas, M. Implementation of telemonitoring in health care: facilitators and barriers for using eHealth for older adults with chronic conditions. Risk management and healthcare policy. 2023, 43-53. [CrossRef]
  27. Antonicelli, R.;Testarmata, P.;Spazzafumo, L.;Gagliardi, C.;Bilo, G.;Valentini, M.;Olivieri, F.;Parati, G. Impact of telemonitoring at home on the management of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. Journal of telemedicine and telecare. 2008, 14, 300-305. [CrossRef]
  28. Gruber, H.-G.;Wolf, B.;Reiher, M. Innovation barriers for telemonitoring. in World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7-12, 2009, Munich, Germany: Vol. 25/5 Information and Communication in Medicine, Telemedicine and e-Health. 2009. Springer. [CrossRef]
  29. Ding, H.;Jayasena, R.;Chen, S.H.;Maiorana, A.;Dowling, A.;Layland, J.;Good, N.;Karunanithi, M.;Edwards, I. The effects of telemonitoring on patient compliance with self-management recommendations and outcomes of the innovative telemonitoring enhanced care program for chronic heart failure: randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020, 22, e17559. [CrossRef]
  30. Alencar, M.;Johnson, K.;Gray, V.;Mullur, R.;Gutierrez, E.;Dionico, P. Telehealth-based health coaching increases m-health device adherence and rate of weight loss in obese participants. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2020, 26, 365-368. [CrossRef]
  31. Young, H.;Miyamoto, S.;Ward, D.;Dharmar, M.;Tang-Feldman, Y.;Berglund, L. Sustained effects of a nurse coaching intervention via telehealth to improve health behavior change in diabetes. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2014, 20, 828-834. [CrossRef]
  32. Laing, B.Y.;Mangione, C.M.;Tseng, C.-H.;Leng, M.;Vaisberg, E.;Mahida, M.;Bholat, M.;Glazier, E.;Morisky, D.E.;Bell, D.S. Effectiveness of a smartphone application for weight loss compared with usual care in overweight primary care patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Annals of internal medicine. 2014, 161, S5-S12. [CrossRef]
  33. Herring, S.J.;Cruice, J.F.;Bennett, G.G.;Davey, A.;Foster, G.D. Using Technology to Promote Postpartum Weight Loss in Urban, Low-Income Mothers: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2014, 46, 610-615. [CrossRef]
  34. Patrick, K.;Marshall, S.J.;Davila, E.P.;Kolodziejczyk, J.K.;Fowler, J.H.;Calfas, K.J.;Huang, J.S.;Rock, C.L.;Griswold, W.G.;Gupta, A.;Merchant, G.;Norman, G.J.;Raab, F.;Donohue, M.C.;Fogg, B.J.;Robinson, T.N. Design and implementation of a randomized controlled social and mobile weight loss trial for young adults (project SMART). Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2014, 37, 10-18. [CrossRef]
  35. Merchant, G.;Weibel, N.;Patrick, K.;Fowler, J.H.;Norman, G.J.;Gupta, A.;Servetas, C.;Calfas, K.;Raste, K.;Pina, L.;Donohue, M.;Griswold, W.G.;Marshall, S. Click “Like” to Change Your Behavior: A Mixed Methods Study of College Students’ Exposure to and Engagement With Facebook Content Designed for Weight Loss. J Med Internet Res. 2014, 16, e158. [CrossRef]
  36. Thomas, J.G.;Leahey, T.M.;Wing, R.R. An automated internet behavioral weight-loss program by physician referral: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2015, 38, 9-15. [CrossRef]
  37. Block, G.;Azar, K.M.J.;Romanelli, R.J.;Block, T.J.;Hopkins, D.;Carpenter, H.A.;Dolginsky, M.S.;Hudes, M.L.;Palaniappan, L.P.;Block, C.H. Diabetes Prevention and Weight Loss with a Fully Automated Behavioral Intervention by Email, Web, and Mobile Phone: A Randomized Controlled Trial Among Persons with Prediabetes. J Med Internet Res. 2015, 17, e240. [CrossRef]
  38. Kim, J.-Y.;Oh, S.;Steinhubl, S.;Kim, S.;Bae, W.K.;Han, J.S.;Kim, J.-H.;Lee, K.;Kim, M.J. Effectiveness of 6 Months of Tailored Text Message Reminders for Obese Male Participants in a Worksite Weight Loss Program: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015, 3, e14. [CrossRef]
  39. Svetkey, L.P.;Batch, B.C.;Lin, P.-H.;Intille, S.S.;Corsino, L.;Tyson, C.C.;Bosworth, H.B.;Grambow, S.C.;Voils, C.;Loria, C.;Gallis, J.A.;Schwager, J.;Bennett, G.B. Cell phone intervention for you (CITY): A randomized, controlled trial of behavioral weight loss intervention for young adults using mobile technology. Obesity. 2015, 23, 2133-2141. [CrossRef]
  40. Wayne, N.;Perez, D.F.;Kaplan, D.M.;Ritvo, P. Health Coaching Reduces HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetic Patients From a Lower-Socioeconomic Status Community: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2015, 17, e224. [CrossRef]
  41. Härter, M.;Dirmaier, J.;Dwinger, S.;Kriston, L.;Herbarth, L.;Siegmund-Schultze, E.;Bermejo, I.;Matschinger, H.;Heider, D.;König, H.-H. Effectiveness of Telephone-Based Health Coaching for Patients with Chronic Conditions: A Randomised Controlled Trial. PLOS ONE. 2016, 11, e0161269. [CrossRef]
  42. Hartman, S.J.;Nelson, S.H.;Cadmus-Bertram, L.A.;Patterson, R.E.;Parker, B.A.;Pierce, J.P. Technology- and Phone-Based Weight Loss Intervention: Pilot RCT in Women at Elevated Breast Cancer Risk. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2016, 51, 714-721. [CrossRef]
  43. Foley, P.;Steinberg, D.;Levine, E.;Askew, S.;Batch, B.C.;Puleo, E.M.;Svetkey, L.P.;Bosworth, H.B.;DeVries, A.;Miranda, H.;Bennett, G.G. Track: A randomized controlled trial of a digital health obesity treatment intervention for medically vulnerable primary care patients. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2016, 48, 12-20. [CrossRef]
  44. Godino, J.G.;Merchant, G.;Norman, G.J.;Donohue, M.C.;Marshall, S.J.;Fowler, J.H.;Calfas, K.J.;Huang, J.S.;Rock, C.L.;Griswold, W.G.;Gupta, A.;Raab, F.;Fogg, B.J.;Robinson, T.N.;Patrick, K. Using social and mobile tools for weight loss in overweight and obese young adults (Project SMART): a 2 year, parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2016, 4, 747-755. [CrossRef]
  45. Stephens, J.D.;Yager, A.M.;Allen, J. Smartphone Technology and Text Messaging for Weight Loss in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2017, 32. [CrossRef]
  46. Redman, L.M.;Gilmore, L.A.;Breaux, J.;Thomas, D.M.;Elkind-Hirsch, K.;Stewart, T.;Hsia, D.S.;Burton, J.;Apolzan, J.W.;Cain, L.E.;Altazan, A.D.;Ragusa, S.;Brady, H.;Davis, A.;Tilford, J.M.;Sutton, E.F.;Martin, C.K. Effectiveness of SmartMoms, a Novel eHealth Intervention for Management of Gestational Weight Gain: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017, 5, e133. [CrossRef]
  47. Hansel, B.;Giral, P.;Gambotti, L.;Lafourcade, A.;Peres, G.;Filipecki, C.;Kadouch, D.;Hartemann, A.;Oppert, J.-M.;Bruckert, E.;Marre, M.;Bruneel, A.;Duchene, E.;Roussel, R. A Fully Automated Web-Based Program Improves Lifestyle Habits and HbA1c in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Abdominal Obesity: Randomized Trial of Patient E-Coaching Nutritional Support (The ANODE Study). J Med Internet Res. 2017, 19, e360. [CrossRef]
  48. Alencar, M.K.;Johnson, K.;Mullur, R.;Gray, V.;Gutierrez, E.;Korosteleva, O. The efficacy of a telemedicine-based weight loss program with video conference health coaching support. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 2017, 25, 151-157. [CrossRef]
  49. Kempf, K.;Röhling, M.;Stichert, M.;Fischer, G.;Boschem, E.;Könner, J.;Martin, S. Telemedical Coaching Improves Long-Term Weight Loss in Overweight Persons: A Randomized Controlled Trial. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications. 2018, 2018, 7530602. [CrossRef]
  50. Johnson, K.E.;Alencar, M.K.;Coakley, K.E.;Swift, D.L.;Cole, N.H.;Mermier, C.M.;Kravitz, L.;Amorim, F.T.;Gibson, A.L. Telemedicine-Based Health Coaching Is Effective for Inducing Weight Loss and Improving Metabolic Markers. Telemedicine and e-Health. 2018, 25, 85-92. [CrossRef]
  51. Patel, M.L.;Hopkins, C.M.;Brooks, T.L.;Bennett, G.G. Comparing Self-Monitoring Strategies for Weight Loss in a Smartphone App: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019, 7, e12209. [CrossRef]
  52. Young, H.M.;Miyamoto, S.;Dharmar, M.;Tang-Feldman, Y. Nurse Coaching and Mobile Health Compared With Usual Care to Improve Diabetes Self-Efficacy for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020, 8, e16665. [CrossRef]
  53. Persell, S.D.;Peprah, Y.A.;Lipiszko, D.;Lee, J.Y.;Li, J.J.;Ciolino, J.D.;Karmali, K.N.;Sato, H. Effect of home blood pressure monitoring via a smartphone hypertension coaching application or tracking application on adults with uncontrolled hypertension: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA network open. 2020, 3, e200255-e200255. [CrossRef]
  54. Duncan, M.J.;Fenton, S.;Brown, W.J.;Collins, C.E.;Glozier, N.;Kolt, G.S.;Holliday, E.G.;Morgan, P.J.;Murawski, B.;Plotnikoff, R.C.;Rayward, A.T.;Stamatakis, E.;Vandelanotte, C.;Burrows, T.L. Efficacy of a Multi-component m-Health Weight-loss Intervention in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020. 17. [CrossRef]
  55. Yew, T.W.;Chi, C.;Chan, S.Y.;van Dam, R.M.;Whitton, C.;Lim, C.S.;Foong, P.S.;Fransisca, W.;Teoh, C.L.;Chen, J.;Ho-Lim, S.T.;Lim, S.L.;Ong, K.W.;Ong, P.H.;Tai, B.C.;Tai, E.S. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effects of a Smartphone Application-Based Lifestyle Coaching Program on Gestational Weight Gain, Glycemic Control, and Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The SMART-GDM Study. Diabetes Care. 2021, 44, 456-463. [CrossRef]
  56. Kempf, K.;Dubois, C.;Arnold, M.;Amelung, V.;Leppert, N.;Altin, S.;Vomhof, M.;Icks, A.;Martin, S. Effectiveness of the Telemedical Lifestyle Intervention Program TeLIPro for Improvement of HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized-Controlled Trial in a Real-Life Setting. Nutrients. 2023, 15, 3954. [CrossRef]
  57. Eid, N.M.S.;Al-ofi, E.A.;Enani, S.;Mosli, R.H.;Saqr, R.R.;Qutah, K.M.;Eid, S.M.S., Effects of a Telenutrition Weight Loss Program Supported with Telemonitoring and Health Coaching on Anthropometric and Biochemical Measures in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study, in Preprints. 2024, Preprints. [CrossRef]
  58. Eid, N.M.S.;Al-ofi, E.A.;Enani, S.;Mosli, R.H.;Saqr, R.R.;Qutah, K.M.;Eid, S.M.S., Impact of Telemonitoring and Telehealth Coaching on the General Nutrition Knowledge in Overweight and Obese Individuals: A Pilot Study, in Preprints. 2024, Preprints. [CrossRef]
  59. Eid, N.M.S.;Al-ofi, E.A.;Enani, S.;Mosli, R.H.;Saqr, R.R.;Qutah, K.M.;Eid, S.M.S., The Impact of Telemonitoring and Health Coaching on Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales in Overweight and Obese Individuals, in Preprints. 2024, Preprints. [CrossRef]
  60. Neuner-Jehle, S.;Schmid, M.;Grüninger, U. The “Health Coaching” programme: a new patient-centred and visually supported approach for health behaviour change in primary care. BMC Family Practice. 2013, 14, 100. [CrossRef]
  61. Almulhim, A.N.;Hartley, H.;Norman, P.;Caton, S.J.;Doğru, O.C.;Goyder, E. Behavioural Change Techniques in Health Coaching-Based Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BMC Public Health. 2023, 23, 95. [CrossRef]
  62. Rosenthal, J., Integrative Nutrition: A Whole-Life Approach to Health and Happiness 2021: Institute for Integrative Nutrition (1 September 2021).
  63. Eid, N.M.E.a.S.M. Development, Translation and Validation of the Circle of Life (Col) Satisfaction Scale assessment tool: an Integrative Nutrition approach Open Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2024, 14.
  64. Eid, N.;Mosli, R.;Enani, S.;Saqr, R.;Al-ofi, E.;Qutah, K.;Eid, S. Corrigendum to “A pilot randomized controlled trial of a telenutrition weight loss program supported with telemonitoring and health coaching in overweight and obese adults”[Clin Nutr ESPEN 63 (2024) 1312–1322]. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 2024, 64, 236. [CrossRef]
  65. Eid, N.M.;Al-Ofi, E.A.;Enani, S.M.;Mosli, R.H.;Saqr, R.R.;Qutah, K.M.;Eid, S.M. A 6-month Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Telenutrition Versus Telenutrition Supported by Telemonitoring and Health Coaching in a Weight Loss Program: A Study Protocol. British Journal of Nutrition. 2024, 1-28. [CrossRef]
Table 1. Published interventions on dietary weight loss programmes [supported with telemonitoring and/or health coaching].
Table 1. Published interventions on dietary weight loss programmes [supported with telemonitoring and/or health coaching].
Citation Year Population Intervention Duration Outcomes
1. [31] 2014 101 adults with diabetes in rural communities Nurse telehealth coaching/ motivational interviewing vs. usual care 9 months Higher self-efficacy scores in the intervention group with positive impact on long-term behavioral change
2. [32] 2014 212 primary care patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 MyFitnessPal app usage with support vs. usual care 6 months Minimal weight change with no significant difference between groups
3. [33] 2014 18 low-income, obese mothers within 1 year postpartum Technology-based with self-monitoring, biweekly counseling, and Facebook group 14 weeks Significant weight loss in intervention group (-2.9 kg) compared to control; 33% of intervention group lost >5% of initial weight
4. [34] 2014 404 overweight/obese college students Social and mobile media-based intervention vs. informational web-based program 24 months Short-term weight loss at 6 and 12 months in intervention; no significant difference at 24 months
5. [35] 2014 404 overweight/obese college students Facebook-based weight loss content and support group 21 months Varied engagement; higher interaction with polls and photos; weight loss engagement diminished over time
6. [36] 2015 154 adults, BMI 25-45 kg/m2 Internet-based behavioral weight-loss program 6 months Significant weight loss in intervention group compared to control; 5% body weight loss in 48% of intervention
7. [37] 2015 339 individuals with prediabetic range fasting glucose or HbA1c Automated behavioral intervention (Alive-PD) with web/ mobile support 6 months Significant reductions in HbA1c, body weight, BMI, waist circumference, and TG/HDL ratio
8. [38] 2015 205 obese men in worksite weight loss program Tailored text-messaging + 4 education sessions + monthly counseling vs. education alone 6 months No significant difference in weight loss between intervention and control groups
9. [39] 2015 365 young adults aged 18-35, BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 mHealth intervention via smartphone vs. personal coaching 24 months Significant weight loss in personal coaching group at 6 months; no difference at 24 months
10. [40] 2015 138 patients with type 2 diabetes. Participants received a health coaching intervention with and without mobile phone monitoring in supporting health behavior change and HbA1c reduction 6 months Significant reductions in HbA1c, weight and waist circumference. Both groups improved mood, life satisfaction, and quality of life
11. [41] 2016 Chronically ill patients across three campaigns (chronic disease, heart failure, mental health) Telephone-based health coaching with motivational interviewing and shared decision-making 2 years Reduced mortality in chronic and heart failure groups; increased hospital readmission in some subgroups
12. [42] 2016 54 women with BMI ≥ 27.5 and elevated breast cancer risk MyFitnessPal + Fitbit for tracking, with 12 coaching calls vs. usual care 6 months Significant weight loss and increased physical activity in the intervention group
13. [43] 2016 351 obese adults aged 21-65 with comorbidities Digital health intervention with self-monitoring and regular coaching vs. usual care 12 months Improved health markers including weight, BP, HbA1c; ongoing follow-up for sustainability analysis
14. [44] 2016 Overweight/obese college students, 18-35 years old SMART program with social and mobile media elements 24 months Limited short-term weight loss; no sustained reduction at 24 months
15. [45] 2017 62 young adults aged 18-25 with BMI 28.5 kg/m2 Smartphone app + health coaching vs. control group 3 months Significant reductions in weight, BMI, and waist circumference in intervention group
16. [46] 2017 54 overweight or obese pregnant women SmartMoms lifestyle intervention via mobile app or in-person vs. usual care Until childbirth Reduced likelihood of exceeding weight gain guidelines in intervention groups; remote intervention cost-effective
17. [47] 2017 120 patients with T2DM and abdominal obesity Fully automated ANODE program for diet and physical activity vs. general advice 16 weeks Improved diet quality index, body weight, waist circumference, and HbA1c in intervention group
18. [48] 2017 25 obese adults Telehealth-based weight loss with video coaching vs. control 12 weeks Significant weight loss in intervention group (7.3 kg vs 1.2 kg_
19. [49] 2018 180 overweight employees Telemedical coaching with monitoring vs. control 12 weeks & 12 months follow-up Long-term weight reduction and improved cholesterol and blood pressure
20. [50] 2018 30 adults with BMI ≥30 kg/m², indicating obesity Health coaching delivered through either videoconferencing or in-person sessions. 12 weeks Significant weight loss and increased steps/day in the VC group compared to the other groups
21. [17] 2019 Overweight employees Telemedical coaching with telemonitoring vs. control groups 12 months Significant weight loss sustained at 12 months in telemedical group; reduced BMI and improved behavior
22. [51] 2019 105 adults with overweight or obesity (BMI 25-45 kg/m2) MyFitnessPal app for weight and diet self-monitoring 12 weeks No difference in weight change between groups
23. [52] 2020 319 adults with type 2 diabetes Nurse coaching + mHealth technology vs. usual care 9 months Improved diabetes self-efficacy and physical activity; short-lived decrease in depressive symptoms
24. [53] 2020 297 adults with uncontrolled hypertension AI-based smartphone coaching app vs. tracking app 6 months No significant difference in blood pressure reduction; slight improvement in blood pressure self-efficacy
25. [54] 2020 116 overweight/obese adults aged 19-65 Enhanced m-health (physical activity, diet, sleep) vs. traditional m-health vs. control 12 months Increased resistance training and reduced energy intake in intervention groups; no significant difference in weight loss compared to control
26. [55] 2021 340 women with gestational diabetes Habits-GDM app for lifestyle monitoring vs. usual care Gestational period Reduced glucose readings in intervention; lower neonatal complications in intervention group
27. [56] 2023 1163 type-2 diabetec patients Telemedical Lifestyle Intervention Program (TeLIPro) 12 months Significantly improvements in HbA1c, body weight, body-mass-index, quality-of-life, and eating behaviour in the TeLIPro group.
28. [57] 2024 50 overweight/obese adults Telenutrition with telemonitoring and health coaching vs. diet alone on the weight and body composition 6 months Significant reduction in weight, BMI, fat % in intervention group; improvement sustained at 6 months
29. [58] 2024 50 overweight/obese adults Telenutrition with telemonitoring and health coaching vs. diet alone on the GNKQ scores 6 months Significant increases in overall nutrition knowledge and specific areas such as the diet-disease relationship and weight management and a significant negative association with BMI and visceral fat percentage
30. [59] 2024 50 overweight/obese adults Telenutrition with telemonitoring and health coaching vs. diet alone on the DASS scale 6 months Significant decrease in anxiety scales when compared and a moderate significant positive correlation between changes in waist circumference and depression sclaes.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated