Submitted:
26 October 2024
Posted:
28 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Proposed Methodology
3.1. System Architecture
- −
- Data Layer: This layer captures energy usage data from IoT sensors deployed at consumer endpoints. The sensors continuously monitor and transmit real-time energy usage data, denoting power consumption as a function of time, expressed mathematically as:where represents the cumulative energy consumption at time t, and is the power drawn by the consumer at that specific time.
- −
-
Blockchain Layer: Utilizing a private blockchain network, this layer ensures that all data collected from consumers is stored immutably. The blockchain platform provides a secure and transparent method for recording transactions related to DSM. Each transaction can be represented as:This structure enables traceability and accountability, contributing to the overall integrity of the data used in DSM.
- −
- Application Layer: This layer implements DSM algorithms and smart contracts designed to optimize energy consumption based on real-time data. The control algorithms can be expressed in a generalized form as:where C is the control signal sent to appliances based on energy usage, power availability, and incentive structures defined by the smart contracts.
3.2. Smart Contract Design
- −
- Incentivization: Consumers are rewarded for reducing demand during peak hours. This incentivization can be mathematically modeled as:where R is the total reward earned, represents the incentive rate at time t, and the integral computes the accumulated rewards over a specified period from to .
- −
- Automation: Smart contracts automatically manage energy loads by adjusting supply based on grid requirements. This can be depicted via the flow of energy, represented as:where is the adjusted supply, is the baseline supply, and is the change in supply dictated by smart contract decisions based on current demand.
- −
- Real-time Adjustments: The demand can be adjusted based on real-time energy availability, price signals, and user preferences. The adjustment function can be represented as:where is the adjusted demand, is the original demand level, and is a scaling factor dependent on price signals and available energy resources.
4. Proposed Methodology and Experimental Analysis
4.1. Data Description
- Data Layer: This layer captures energy consumption data in real-time from IoT sensors located at various consumer sites. The energy consumption at any given time t is determined by the product of instantaneous power consumption and time, expressed as:where denotes the instantaneous power usage. This data provides a detailed overview of consumption patterns and is essential for understanding demand dynamics in DSM.
- Blockchain Layer: The energy consumption data is recorded immutably on a private blockchain, ensuring secure and transparent DSM operations. Each transaction logged in the blockchain includes a timestamp, consumer ID, energy consumption , and any DSM action taken. This transaction structure can be represented as:where ensures traceability and accountability for all energy-related actions in the DSM framework, enhancing transparency for both consumers and energy providers.
-
Application Layer: This layer leverages smart contracts to implement DSM algorithms, issuing control signals C based on real-time energy data and incentive structures. The control signal C is computed as a function of energy consumption , power usage , and an incentive rate, as shown below:This layer dynamically adjusts appliance usage and other DSM parameters based on energy supply and demand to optimize energy efficiency within the system.

4.2. Experimental Analysis
4.2.1. Energy Consumption over Time
4.2.2. Incentivization Reward Accumulation
4.2.3. Adjusted Supply and Demand over Time
4.3. Comparison with State-of-the-Art Approaches
- Efficiency and Responsiveness: Traditional DSM systems experience delays in reward allocation and demand adjustments, leading to lower user engagement [?]. Our blockchain-based DSM model provides immediate rewards and real-time demand adjustments, making it more responsive and efficient.
- Transparency and Accountability: Blockchain’s immutable ledger allows transparent tracking of DSM actions and incentives, unlike traditional DSM systems that lack visibility, which can reduce trust in the system [?].
- User Engagement: Immediate and verifiable rewards improve consumer participation in DSM programs. This level of engagement is often challenging to achieve with non-blockchain DSM models [?].
5. Experimental Analysis and Discussion
5.1. Transaction Costs
5.2. Latency
5.3. User Participation Rates
5.4. Energy Savings
5.5. Discussion and Originality of the Proposed Approach
- Enhanced Transparency and Security: Blockchain ensures secure and immutable transaction records, which is critical for traceability in DSM.
- Real-time Incentivization: Smart contracts dynamically adjust rewards based on demand, enhancing user participation and promoting energy-saving behaviors.
- Reduced Latency and Cost Efficiency: The decentralized nature of blockchain minimizes transaction costs and latency, making it highly suitable for real-time applications.
5.6. Comparative Analysis of Traditional DSM vs Blockchain-Based DSM
5.6.1. Transaction Costs over Time
5.6.2. Latency Comparison over Time
5.6.3. User Participation Rates over Time
5.6.4. Energy Savings Comparison over Time
5.7. Discussion and Originality of the Proposed Approach
- Cost Efficiency: By eliminating intermediaries and using smart contracts, the proposed approach achieves substantial cost reductions, as shown in the transaction cost analysis.
- Enhanced Responsiveness: The decentralized structure of blockchain reduces latency, making it ideal for real-time DSM.
- Incentivized User Engagement: Blockchain-based DSM encourages user participation through transparent and reliable incentive mechanisms, fostering higher engagement rates.
- Energy Optimization: With real-time adjustments and user incentives, the blockchain-based model promotes greater energy savings, addressing sustainability goals more effectively.
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
- Development of a multi-layered DSM architecture that integrates blockchain, IoT metering, and smart contracts.
- A reward-based incentivization model that successfully engages consumers in energy-saving practices.
- Quantitative validation of blockchain’s effectiveness in reducing operational costs and latency while optimizing energy efficiency.
8. Future Work
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Q. Liu et al., "Demand Side Management: A Review of the Current State and Future Directions," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 785-792, 2020.
- D. Tapscott and A. Tapscott, "Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money, Business, and the World," Penguin, 2016.
- H. Li et al., "A Survey of Blockchain Technology Applications in the Energy Sector," Energies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-30, 2018. [CrossRef]
- Boumaiza, A. A Blockchain-Based Scalability Solution with Microgrids Peer-to-Peer Trade. Energies 2024, 17, 915. [CrossRef]
- Boumaiza, A. Carbon and Energy Trading Integration within a Blockchain-Powered Peer-to-Peer Framework. Energies 2024, 17, 2473. [CrossRef]
- A. Boumaiza and A. Sanfilippo, "Blockchain For Transactive Energy Marketplace," 2023 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Helsinki, Finland, 2023, pp. 1-5. [CrossRef]
- A. Boumaiza, S. Abbar, N. Mohandes and A. Sanfilippo, "Innovation diffusion for renewable energy technologies," 2018 IEEE 12th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG 2018), Doha, Qatar, 2018, pp. 1-6. [CrossRef]
- A. Boumaiza and A. Sanfilippo, "Blockchain-based Local Energy Marketplace Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation," 2023 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Orlando, FL, USA, 2023, pp. 1-5. [CrossRef]
- Breakthrough Energy Coalition. (2018). Blockchain for Social Impact: Energy. Retrieved from https://www.breakthroughenergy.org.
- Luthra, S., & Mangla, S. K. (2021). Blockchain Technology: A new innovation for renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110499.
- Mohammad, H. A., & Rahman, S. (2019). Blockchain-based decentralized energy transaction model for peer-to-peer energy trading. Energies, 12(12), 2213.
- Nguyen, T., & Dinh, T. Q. (2020). Blockchain application in grid management and electric markets. IEEE Access, 8, 94834-94850.
- Zhang, P., & Wu, Q. (2022). Consumer engagement in energy efficiency via blockchain technology. Applied Energy, 231, 115547.
- Peters, A. R., & Bree, O. D. (2020). Cost reductions through blockchain in energy management. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 117, 105658.
- Cai, Z., & Yang, Y. (2021). Performance Evaluation of Energy Blockchain Networks: A Review. Information Sciences, 554, 1-14.
- Micallef, A., & Gatt, S. (2021). Privacy concerns in energy blockchain applications. Information Systems, 105, 101815.
- Li, Y., Li, T., & Wang, J. (2020). A survey on the interoperability issues in energy management systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(3), 1849-1859.
- De, S., & Jha, A. (2021). Energy efficiency vs. energy consumption in blockchain technologies: A sustainability perspective. Energy Reports, 7, 420-430.
- Wang, Q., Su, M., Li, R., Ponce, P. (2021). A Blockchain-Based Decentralized Energy Trading and Demand Response in the Smart Grid. IEEE Access, 9, 167244–167256. [CrossRef]
- Yu, W., Xu, H., Zhang, J., Zheng, Z. (2020). Demand Side Management for Smart Grid Using Blockchain and Smart Contracts. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(5), 3157–3165. [CrossRef]
- Liu, X., Zhang, H., Guo, Z., Sun, H. (2019). A Blockchain-Enabled Internet of Things Platform for Energy Management in Smart Homes. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5), 9096–9104. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C., Wu, J., Zhou, J., Cheng, M. (2021). Blockchain Technology for Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid: A Survey. Energy Reports, 7, 1083–1097. [CrossRef]
- Li, J., Zhang, Q., Yang, Q., Hu, B., He, Y. (2020). Real-time Electricity Demand Response Based on Blockchain Technology for Smart City. Applied Energy, 260, 114313. [CrossRef]
- Gao, J., Wu, Q., Liu, C., Wang, Z. (2019). Smart Contract-Based Electricity Demand Response Using Blockchain Technology. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(3), 3020–3031. [CrossRef]
- Sousa, T., Soares, T., Pinson, P., Moret, F., Baroche, T., Sorin, E. (2019). Peer-to-Peer and Community-Based Markets: A Comprehensive Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 367–378. [CrossRef]
- Kar, S., Debnath, R., Maji, A. (2019). Blockchain for Future Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118980. [CrossRef]
- Yi, C., Jiang, Y., Li, R., Guo, Z. (2021). Decentralized and Privacy-Preserving Demand Side Management Based on Blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(6), 4334–4343. [CrossRef]
- Pustišek, M., Kos, A. (2018). Approaches to Front-End IoT Application Development for the Ethereum Blockchain. Procedia Computer Science, 129, 410–419. [CrossRef]
- Hussain, A., Fatima, A., Saeed, M., Khan, M. (2020). A Blockchain-Based Demand Response Mechanism for Optimizing Power Consumption. IEEE Access, 8, 46786–46798. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q., Su, M., Li, R., Ponce, P. (2021). A Blockchain-Based Decentralized Energy Trading and Demand Response in the Smart Grid. IEEE Access, 9, 167244–167256. [CrossRef]
- Yu, W., Xu, H., Zhang, J., Zheng, Z. (2020). Demand Side Management for Smart Grid Using Blockchain and Smart Contracts. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(5), 3157–3165. [CrossRef]
- Liu, X., Zhang, H., Guo, Z., Sun, H. (2019). A Blockchain-Enabled Internet of Things Platform for Energy Management in Smart Homes. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(5), 9096–9104. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C., Wu, J., Zhou, J., Cheng, M. (2021). Blockchain Technology for Demand Response Management in the Smart Grid: A Survey. Energy Reports, 7, 1083–1097. [CrossRef]
- Li, J., Zhang, Q., Yang, Q., Hu, B., He, Y. (2020). Real-time Electricity Demand Response Based on Blockchain Technology for Smart City. Applied Energy, 260, 114313. [CrossRef]
- Gao, J., Wu, Q., Liu, C., Wang, Z. (2019). Smart Contract-Based Electricity Demand Response Using Blockchain Technology. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(3), 3020–3031. [CrossRef]
- Sousa, T., Soares, T., Pinson, P., Moret, F., Baroche, T., Sorin, E. (2019). Peer-to-Peer and Community-Based Markets: A Comprehensive Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 367–378. [CrossRef]
- Kar, S., Debnath, R., Maji, A. (2019). Blockchain for Future Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118980. [CrossRef]
- Yi, C., Jiang, Y., Li, R., Guo, Z. (2021). Decentralized and Privacy-Preserving Demand Side Management Based on Blockchain. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(6), 4334–4343. [CrossRef]
- Pustišek, M., Kos, A. (2018). Approaches to Front-End IoT Application Development for the Ethereum Blockchain. Procedia Computer Science, 129, 410–419. [CrossRef]
- Hussain, A., Fatima, A., Saeed, M., Khan, M. (2020). A Blockchain-Based Demand Response Mechanism for Optimizing Power Consumption. IEEE Access, 8, 46786–46798. [CrossRef]



Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).