Submitted:
22 October 2024
Posted:
23 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Concentrate Evaluation
2.2. Thermodynamic Calculations
2.3. Experimental Study
3. Results
3.1. Revenue Calculations
3.2. Results of Thermodynamic Calculations
| Compositions | Cu, wt% |
Ag ppm |
Au ppm |
Fe, wt% |
O, wt% |
S, wt% |
SiO2, wt% |
Al2O3, wt% |
CaO, wt% |
MgO, wt% |
| Discard slag Case 1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 43.9 | 14.4 | 0.4 | 31.2 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Discard slag Case 2 | 0.8 | 4.7 | 0.7 |
45.0 | 15.5 | 0.4 | 29.0 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 1.7 |
| Anode copper Case 1 | 99.5 | 161.0 | 15.8 | <0.001 | 1490 ppm | 20 ppm | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Anode copper Case 2 | 99.0 | 679.3 | 124.4 | <0.001 | 1460 ppm | 8 ppm | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Smelter dust Case 1 | 11.2 | 19 | 2 | 12.8 | 40.0 | 17.5 | 3.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Smelter dust Case 2 | 8.2 | 68 | 10 | 11.6 | 37.8 | 15.4 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Flowsheet re-circulation Case 1, % | 20 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 65 | 10 |
| Flowsheet re-circulation Case 2, % | 14 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
| Compositions (continued) | Pb, wt% |
Zn, wt% |
Ni, wt% |
As, wt% |
Sb, wt% |
Bi, wt% |
Mol As/(Bi +Sb | Cu recov., % | Ag recov., % | Au recov., % |
| Discard slag Case 1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | <0.01 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.01 | ||||
| Discard slag Case 2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 0.07 | 0.01 | ||||
| Anode copper Case 1 | 830 ppm | 9 ppm | 410 ppm | 930 ppm | 140 ppm | 840 ppm | 2 | 98.5 | 98.9 | 99.2 |
| Anode copper Case 2 | 480 ppm | 9 ppm | 2170 ppm | 2780 ppm | 705 ppm | 1010 ppm | 3 | 97.5 | 97.8 | 98.2 |
| Tolerable levels, ppm [36,37] | 4000 | 100 | 3000 | 500-1500 | 350 | 300 | >2 | |||
| Smelter dust Case 1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | <0.001 | 9.6 | 0.02 | 2.2 | ||||
| Smelter dust Case 2 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.03 | 12.6 | 0.06 | 5.2 | ||||
| Flowsheet re-circulation Case 1, % | 290 | 40 | 80 | 570 | 30 | 1100 | ||||
| Flowsheet re-circulation Case 2, % | 200 | 25 | 50 | 400 | 15 | 1030 |
3.3. Analysis of Accuracy of Thermodynamic Predictions
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pickens, N.; Griffin, R.G.; Joannides, E.; Liu, Z. Securing copper supply: no China, no energy transition. Horizons Wood Mackenzie 2024, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, H.; Liu, G.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, C.; Mian, M.M.; Cheema, A.I. Strategies for arsenic pollution control from copper pyrometallurgy based on the study of arsenic sources, emission pathways and speciation characterization in copper flash smelting systems. Environmental Pollution (Oxford, United Kingdom) 2021, 270, 116203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arias, L.; Balladares, E.; Parra, R.; Sbarbaro, D.; Torres, S. Sensors and Process Control in Copper Smelters: A Review of Current Systems and Some Opportunities. Minerals 2021, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bale, C.W.; Belisle, E.; Chartrand, P.; Decterov, S.A.; Eriksson, G.; Gheribi, A.E.; Hack, K.; Jung, I.H.; Kang, Y.B.; Melancon, J.; et al. FactSage thermochemical software and databases, 2010-2016. CALPHAD 2016, 54, 35–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Söderström, U. Copper smelter revenue stream. In Proceedings of the Boliden Capital Markets Day; 2008; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- Payable metal and revenue issues in relation to royalty applying to prescribed and particular minerals. 2010.
- Salomon-de-Friedberg, H.; Robinson, T. Tackling impurities in copper concentrates. In Proceedings of the Teck Resources Limited; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Jak, E.; Shevchenko, M.; Shishin, D.; Nekhoroshev, E.; Chen, J.; Hayes, P. University Research on molten slags, matte, speiss and metal systems for high temperature processing. In Proceedings of the Molten 2024, Brisbane, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Shishin, D.; Decterov, S.A.; Jak, E. Thermodynamic assessment of slag-matte-metal equilibria in the Cu–Fe–O–S–Si system. J. Phase Equilib. Diff. 2018, 39, 456–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shishin, D.; Hidayat, T.; Fallah Mehrjardi, A.; Hayes, P.C.; Decterov, S.A.; Jak, E. Integrated experimental and thermodynamic modelling study of the effects of Al2O3, CaO and MgO on slag–matte equilibria in the Cu–Fe–O–S–Si–(Al, Ca, Mg) system. J. Phase Equilib. Diff. 2018, 40, 445–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shishin, D.; Hidayat, T.; Chen, J.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Experimental Investigation and Thermodynamic Modelling of the Distributions of Ag and Au between Slag, Matte and Metal in the Cu-Fe-O-S-Si System. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy 2018, 5, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shishin, D.; Tripathi, N.; Babaian, I.; Jak, E. The Link Between Slag Chemistry and Arsenic Flows in Primary Copper Smeltin. In Proceedings of the COM2 4381.
- Shishin, D.; Prostakova, V.; Jak, E. Review and thermodynamic analysis of As (arsenic) in copper smelting liquid mattes, metals, slags, speiss and solid phases. In Proceedings of the COPPER 2022, Santiago, Chile, 2022.
- Alvear Flores, G.R.F.; Löbbus, M.; Springub, B.; Fallah-Mehrjardi, A.; Tappe, A. Sulfide Smelting: Thirty-Five Years of Continuous Efforts to Find New Value Adding Solutions. In Proceedings of the Extraction 2018, Cham, 2018//, 2018; pp. 39-56.
- Alexander, C.; Johto, H.; Lindgren, M.; Pesonen, L.; Roine, A. Comparison of environmental performance of modern copper smelting technologies. Cleaner Environmental Systems 2021, 3, 100052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, B.; Liao, J. Development of Bottom-Blowing Copper Smelting Technology: A Review. Metals (Basel, Switzerland) 2022, 12, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Xia, L. The practice of copper matte converting in China. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. 2019, 128, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swinbourne, D.R.; Kho, T.S. Computational Thermodynamics Modeling of Minor Element Distributions During Copper Flash Converting. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2012, 43, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, R.; Nexhip, C.; Krippner, D.; George-Kennedy, D.; Routledge, M. Kennecott-Outotec ‘double flash’ technology after 16 years. In Proceedings of the 13th International Flash Smelting Congress, Zambia, Oct 2011, 2011.
- Jak, E.; Nexhip, C.; George-Kennedy, D.P. Calcium ferrite slag phase chemistry control used in continuous flash converting. In Proceedings of the Nickolas themelis symposium on pyrometallurgy and process engineering, Santiago Chile; 2013; pp. 503–522. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q.; Guo, X. Investigation of the Oxygen Bottom Blown Copper Smelting Process. In Proceedings of the Extraction 2018, Cham, 2018//, 2018; pp. 445-461.
- Wang, S.; Guo, X. Thermodynamic Modeling of Oxygen Bottom-Blowing Continuous Converting Process. 2018; pp. 573-583.
- Kaur, R.; Nexhip, C.; Wilson, M.; George-Kennedy, D. Minor element deportment at the Kennecott Utah Copper Smelter. In Proceedings of the Copper 2010, Hamburg, Germany; 2010; pp. 2415–2432. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, S.; Yuan, X.; Liu, F.; Zhao, B. Control of Copper Content in Flash Smelting Slag and the Recovery of Valuable Metals from Slag-A Thermodynamic Consideration. Metals (Basel, Switzerland) 2023, 13, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sineva, S.; Shishin, D.; Starykh, R.; Hayes, P.C.; Jak, E. Equilibrium Distributions of Pb, Bi, and Ag between Fayalite Slag and Copper-Rich Metal, Calcium Ferrite Slag and Copper-Rich Metal. Thermodynamic Assessment and Experimental Study at 1250 °C. Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy 2021, 7, 569–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khartcyzov, G.; Kleeberg, C.; Shevchenko, M.; Shishin, D.; Jak, E. Analysis of slag chemistry in WEEE smelting using experimental and modelling study of the “CuO0.5”-ZnO-FeO-FeO1.5-CaO-SiO2-AlO1.5 system in equilibrium with Cu metal. Ceramics International 2024. [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Zhou, S.; Li, B.; Wei, Y. Copper Concentrate Blending and Melting Prediction Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm. Jom 2023, 75, 4350–4360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hannu, J.; Ali, B.; Lauri, P. Detailed OPEX Comparison of Modern Copper Smelting Technologies Using HSC-SIM Modelling. 2019.
- Parra, R.; Kapusta, J.P. Early Concept and Development of an “Intelligent Tuyere” for Copper Bath Smelting and Converting. Cham, 2023; pp. 789-799.
- Moosavi-Khoonsari, E.; Tripathi, N. Gold Recovery from Smelting Copper Sulfide Concentrate. Preprints 2024, 2024091473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavez, O.; Herrera, P.; González, M.T.; Rivera, O. Copper Recovery Through Smelter Slag Flotation in Atacama, Chile: An Industrial Case Study. Ingeniería e Investigación 2021. [CrossRef]
- Nuorivaara, T.; Klemettinen, A.; Serna-Guerrero, R. Improving the flotation recovery of Cu from flash smelting slags by utilizing cellulose-based frother formulationss. Minerals Engineering 2022, 181, 107522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, B.; Liao, J. Development of Bottom-Blowing Copper Smelting Technology: A Review. Metals 2022, 12, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rinne, T.; Klemettinen, A.; Klemettinen, L.; Ruismäki, R.; O’Brien, H.; Jokilaakso, A.; Serna-Guerrero, R. Recovering Value from End-of-Life Batteries by Integrating Froth Flotation and Pyrometallurgical Copper-Slag Cleaning. Metals 2022, 12, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, S.; Liu, Z.; Lu, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, Q.; Xia, L. The Phase Transition and Element Distribution of Copper Smelting Slag in the Cooling—Sulfidation Process. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B 2023, 54, 969–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moats, M.S.; Aslin, N.; Pranowo, A.; Alvear Flores, G.R.F. Arsenic's behaviour and benefits in copper electrorefining. In Proceedings of the COM 2014, 53rd Annual Conference of Metallurgists, Vancouver, 2014.
- Larouche, P. Minor elements in copper smelting and electrorefining. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, 2001.
- Tan, P.; Woodall, P.; Telford, P. ESP Dust Recovery Process Test Works, Plant Trial, Commissioning, Operations and Metallurgical Performance. 2012, 891-899. [CrossRef]
- Joubert, H.; Mc Dougall, I.; Villiers, G.; Nikolic, S.; Dyussekenov, N.; Eggert, M. Design, Construction and Performance of the Copper Cooling System Installed in the First ISACONVERT™ Copper Converting Furnace. In Proceedings of the Copper 2022, Santiago, Chile; 2023; pp. 182–199. [Google Scholar]
- Mwanza, T.; Eggert, M.; Chirwa, W.; Prince, M.; Dyussekenov, N.; Marschall, D. Kansanshi Copper Smelter ISACONVERT™ Furnace Tapping System Design, Operation, and Improvements. In Furnace Tapping; 2022; pp. 233-244.










| Dry Composition | Cu, wt% |
Ag ppm |
Au ppm |
Fe, wt% |
O, wt% |
S, wt% |
SiO2, wt% |
Al2O3, wt% |
CaO, wt% |
MgO, wt% |
+H2O, wt% |
| Concentrate 1 (blend for Case 1) |
25 | 40 | 4 | 28.0 | 0.1 | 34 | 8 | 2.5 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 8.0 |
| Concentrate 2 | 18 | 70 | 80 | 30.0 | 0.3 | 24 | 18 | 4.5 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 |
| Concentrate 3 | 20 | 3300 | 3 | 20.0 | 0.1 | 31 | 7 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 8.0 |
| Concentrate 4 | 18 | 30 | 3 | 34.5 | 0.1 | 38 | 7 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 8.0 |
| Blend for Case 2 | 21 | 144 | 26.5 | 29.9 | 0.2 | 32 | 10.7 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 8.0 |
| US$/t | US$/g | US$/g | |||||||||
| Price | +9800 | +0.8 | +75 | ||||||||
| Dry Composition (continued) | Pb, wt% |
Zn, wt% |
Ni, wt% |
As, wt% |
Sb, wt% |
Bi, wt% |
Cd, wt% | F, wt% | Hg, wt% | Se, wt% | Price US$/t |
| Concentrate 1 (blend for Case 1) |
0.08 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.0003 | 0.005 | 2650 |
| Concentrate 2 | 0.30 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.003 | 0.05 | 0.0003 | 0.008 | 7551 |
| Concentrate 3 | 6.50 | 8.5 | 0.01 | 2.40 | 1.50 | 0.30 | 0.003 | 0.01 | 0.0024 | 0.008 | 3940 |
| Concentrate 4 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.0004 | 0.017 | 1873 |
| Blend for Case 2 | 0.32 | 0.6 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.002 | 0.02 | 0.0004 | 0.009 | 3972 |
| Penalty, US$/0.1 wt. % | -0.3 | -0.3 | -1.0 | -2/-5 | -15 | -25 | -30 | -15 | -3000 | -15 | |
| Penalty limit, wt. % | 1 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.2/1.0 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.0005 | 0.03 |
| Process parameters | Case 1 Smelting | Case 1 Converting | Case 2 Smelting | Case 2 Converting |
| Furnace type | Flash | Flash | Bottom-Blown | Bottom-blown |
| Slag type | Fayalite | Cu2O-Calcium ferrite | Fayalite | Cu2O-Fayalite-based |
| Dry concentrate rate, t/h | 230 [2] | 130 [14] | ||
| Moisture in feed, t/h (%) | 0.5 (0.2 %) [15] | 0.0 | 13 (8 %) [16] | 0.0 |
| Feed temperature, °C | 150 | 25 | 25 | 1200 [17] |
| Temperature in Reactor zone, °C | 1300 [17] | 1260 [17,18] | 1250 | 1250 [17] |
| Temperature in Settler zone, °C | 1250 [17] | 1250 [17,18] | 1200 [16] | 1250 [17] |
| Oxygen enrichment in the blast, vol. % | 85 [2] | 85 [17] | 68 [16] | 25 [17] |
| Phase equilibria target | Fe/SiO2 in slag = 1.4 (~50 °C above liquidus) [19] | Fe/CaO in slag = 3.0 (~10 °C above liquidus) [19] |
Fe/SiO2 in slag+solids = 1.55 (8% solids in slag) [16] | Fe/ SiO2 in slag = 1.0 (10 °C above liquidus) [17] |
| Chemical target | 70 wt% Cu in matte [17] | 22 wt% Cu in slag [20] | 74 wt% Cu in matte [21] | 23 wt% Cu in slag [22] |
| Energy balance (-1 × Heat loss), MW | -30 | -7 | -15 | -4 |
| Non-thermodynamic factors | ||||
| Oxygen efficiency, % | 99 | 99 | 90 | 99 |
| Volatile coal, % | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Mechanical dust carry-over, % | 6 [13] | 5 [17] | 2 [14] | 1 |
| Non-equilibrium As evaporation, % | 60 [13] | 1 [23] | 60 | 1 |
| Entrainment, grams in 100 of slag+solids (estimated from industrial samples) |
1.5 [24] | 0.5 | 2.5 [21] | 0.5 |
| Wt% | Cu | Fe | S | [O] | Al2O3 | SiO2 | Ni | Co | As | Bi | Pb | Zn | Au | Ag | Sb | Mass |
| Slag (exp) | 1.1 | 39.6 | 0.2 | 11.3 | 12.2 | 32.1 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.036 | 4.1E-06 | 0.170 | 0.476 | 5.4E-05 | 0.005 | 0.55 | 0.90 |
| Matte (exp) | 72.4 | 2.7 | 20.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.84 | 0.06 | 0.004 | 3.3E-05 | 0.100 | 0.090 | 0.3920 | 0.478 | 0.11 | 1.00 |
| Spinel (exp) | 0.0 | 48.9 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 31.7 | 0.3 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.011 | <1E-06 | 0.017 | 1.440 | <1E-06 | 0.000 | 0.01 | 0.10 |
| FactSage Input | 73.4 | 43.3 | 20.5 | 11.9 | 14.1 | 28.9 | 0.96 | 0.33 | 0.038 | 3.7E-05 | 0.254 | 0.662 | 0.3921 | 0.483 | 0.61 | |
| Slag (calc) | 0.9 | 37.7 | 0.2 | 11.9 | 12.2 | 35.4 | 0.06 | 0.24 | 0.040 | 1.1E-05 | 0.143 | 0.594 | 6.4E-05 | 0.004 | 0.63 | 0.82 |
| Matte (calc) | 72.8 | 3.8 | 21.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.84 | 0.08 | 0.005 | 2.8E-05 | 0.137 | 0.078 | 0.3924 | 0.480 | 0.09 | 1.00 |
| Spinel (calc) | 0.0 | 53.5 | 0.0 | 19.6 | 25.4 | 0.0 | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.000 | <1E-06 | 0.000 | 0.606 | 0.0000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.16 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).