Preprint
Review

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Recombinant Live-Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine for Veterinary Use

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

17 October 2024

Posted:

18 October 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
Vaccination is essential in maintaining animal health, with a priority on safety and cost-effectiveness in veterinary vaccines. The development of recombinant live-attenuated Salmonella vaccines (RASVs) has enabled the construction of balanced lethal systems, ensuring the stability of plasmid vectors encoding protective antigens post-immunization. These vaccines are particularly suitable for production animals, providing long-term immunity against a range of bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens. This review summarizes the progress made in this field, with a focus on clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy and commercial potential of RASVs in veterinary medicine.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The growing human population has led to an increase in the demand for foods of animal origin, resulting in consequent changes in agricultural production [1]. Animals are often produced in confinement, which predisposes them to the spread of various diseases [2]. Many infectious microorganisms can be zoonotic, and are transmitted from animals—whether they are food animals, companion animals, or wildlife—to humans [3,4]. Furthermore, these diseases affect the well-being and productivity of animals, causing economic losses and impacting the food supply [5].
There are solutions that can help control diseases in production animal farms, including effective sanitation in facilities, quarantine or slaughter of contaminated animals, administration of treatment with antibiotics, antivirals, and antiparasitics, as well as vaccination [2]. However, there are growing concerns related to antibiotic resistance associated with their extensive use [6,7]. This is coupled with the high cost of developing new effective drugs to treat bacterial, viral, and parasitic infections that are non-toxic [8]. These challenges have become significant obstacles for treating of infectious diseases.
Therefore, vaccination has emerged as an alternative that can reduce the reliance on antibiotics for treating infections [1]. While much of the current research has focused on recombinant subunit vaccines, the cost of veterinary vaccines is primarily due to the purification process required for these proteins, which makes them more expensive compared to traditional vaccines [9]. Despite their lower production costs, bacterins have been associated with variable efficacy and potential side effects, as observed in leptospirosis [10]. While each vaccination strategy has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, veterinary vaccines must prioritize safety, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to provide long-lasting protective immunity against pathogenic microorganisms [8].
Among the various vaccine formulations using infectious bacterial agents as carriers of immunoprotective antigens, Salmonella stands out. This enteropathogenic bacterium infects both humans and animals, causing a variety of illnesses from gastroenteritis to systemic typhoid fever [11,12]. The prevalence of Salmonella varies geographically, with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) being one of the most commonly isolated serovars from animals and humans worldwide (Ferrari et al., 2019). Some serovars exhibit host specificity, such as Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis (S. Cholerasuis) in pigs, Salmonella enterica serovar Abortusovis (S. Abortusovis) in sheep, and Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin (S. Dublin) in cattle [13,14,15].
Despite its potential pathogenicity, Salmonella is easily managed and genetically manipulated, making it an ideal candidate for antigen delivery systems for several reasons [16]. The inactivation of metabolic genes in live vaccines enables the expression of essential antigens and virulence factors while constraining their ability to proliferate. Consequently, vaccine strains engineered and deleted via techniques such as site-directed mutagenesis demonstrate complete biological containment [17,18].
These attenuated strains replicate the natural infection process, possessing the ability to invade and replicate within mucosa-associated lymphatic tissues (MALT) and gut-associated lymphatic tissues (GALT), such as Peyer's patches, before spreading systemically via mesenteric lymph nodes [18,19]. This characteristic dissemination pattern enables Salmonella to evoke robust protective immunity, particularly when administered orally, which stimulates both mucosal and systemic immune responses [20,21]. Additionally, several studies have shown that administering live-attenuated Salmonella vaccines via intramuscular or subcutaneous routes in animals (such as mice, dogs, and goats) effectively stimulates an immune response [22,23,24].
The adoption of rationally live-attenuated Salmonella vaccines is already underway in farm animal vaccination programs, aiming to control infections and prevent disease spread [25,26]. Additionally, numerous studies have explored vaccine constructs based on live-attenuated Salmonella, primarily carrying antigens against a variety of other organisms, including bacteria, viruses, and parasites [27,28,29,30,31]. These vaccines are preferably administered orally and nasally because of their ease of delivery, allowing for needle-free administration in a straightforward and painless manner. They can be administered via spray or mixed into water, making them more suitable for widespread use in commercial animals such as poultry, swine, and fish [31,32]. However, oral administration in ruminants still poses challenges due to the process of rumination and regurgitation of food, necessitating techniques like microparticle encapsulation to enhance efficacy [33].
The significance of using live-attenuated Salmonella vaccines in veterinary practices is reinforced by their storage convenience [16]. They can be easily freeze-dried and maintained at room temperature, offering a notable advantage for their implementation in livestock, especially in regions lacking vaccine refrigeration facilities [33,34]. Emphasizing these diverse benefits, this review examines compelling findings from past and ongoing studies that explore the progress of recombinant live-attenuated Salmonella vaccines (RASVs) as versatile delivery vector for the prevention of various infectious diseases.

2. Commercial Veterinary Vaccines against Salmonella in Farm Animals

The use of vaccines to control infections caused by Salmonella spp. has been widely adopted in various countries [35]. However, the use of commercial bacterins poses a risk of heightened vaccine reactions at the injection site, typically following intramuscular administration, because of the presence of toxic components in bacterial cells, particularly lipopolysaccharides (LPS) and oil emulsion adjuvants [36]. Additionally, many killed whole-cell vaccines offer limited cross-protection against other antigenically related serotypes [11,14].
The use of live-attenuated Salmonella vaccines, which are designed to decrease disease prevalence and confer protection against various pathogen strains, is becoming increasingly commercially available [37,38]. These vaccines are being licensed for use in production animals across several countries [39]. Among the live-attenuated vaccines against Salmonella available in Europe and Australia for chicken producers are those targeting S. Typhimurium, S. Enteritidis, and S. Gallinarum. In a field study, Lyimu et al. [25] evaluated the effect of three commercial live-attenuated vaccine strains on cecal immune genes and compared with cytokine expression. The vaccine induced more anti-inflammatory cecal environment and Th1 responses, crucial to limiting Salmonella contamination in chickens. Furthermore, they reported an increase in serum IgG in the vaccine group that received the commercial vaccine against S. Typhimurium when compared to the control. However, they also reported that the live vaccine can modify the shape of different microbiota profiles.
Another example of commercially available vaccines for veterinary use is the live-attenuated vaccine against S. Typhimurium in pigs [26]. The Salmonella vaccine has already been evaluated in sows and piglets weaned from four, three and 24 days to six and seven weeks of age [40,41] and in sows and gilts [42]. Recently, in a study using different swine production cycles, the use of the vaccine in sows and piglets, and fattening pigs, resulted in control of S. Typhimurium infections and decreased prevalence of positive lymph nodes at slaughter [26].

3. Role of Attenuation in the Recombinant Salmonella Vaccine

Salmonella has been used as a vector for heterologous antigens, mainly because of its ability to elicit long-lasting mucosal, systemic, and cellular immune responses [17]. It can be administered by various routes, including oral, nasal, subcutaneous and intramuscular [20]. However, for the use of live recombinant Salmonella, attenuation of virulence factors is mandatory in order to prevent unwanted side effects such as fever and diarrhea [43].
Several approaches have been studied for the development of live-attenuated recombinant Salmonella vaccines, including different mutations that guarantee the attenuation of these strains, through regulated delayed attenuation, delayed antigen synthesis, and/or delayed lysis [8,17]. These strategies enabled the construction of a balanced lethal system and the stability of plasmid vectors encoding protective antigens in vivo after immunization [17,44].
Regulation allows this vector to present characteristics similar to those of the wild type, enabling its survival and transit through the gastrointestinal tract and the execution of the initial stages of infection before exhibiting attenuation [45]. These studies have led to advances and discoveries in biological containment and antigen delivery systems using Salmonella [20]. The deletion of Δpmi or ΔgalE genes makes the strains dependent on exogenous mannose and galactose, respectively [46]. These genes encode surface antigens, such as O antigen side chains, and cause phenotypic changes in lipopolysaccharides, which are crucial factors for host colonization [18]. Furthermore, it is possible to use the deletion or mutation of genes necessary for the biosynthesis of metabolically essential elements, such as aromatic amino acids and vitamins, including the ΔaroA, ΔaroC and ΔaroD deletions [47]. An example of this type of attenuation used in the study was the S. Typhimurium, LVR01 strain, which was constructed by introducing a null deletion in the ΔaroC gene of the canine parental isolate of S. Typhimurium, P228067 [48].
Likewise, to regulate expression at the promoters of the chromosomal repressor gene lacI, or through the promoter, in regulatory pathways with pleiotropic effects (cya, crp, phoP), including activating or repressor protein binding sequences, for genes of iron acquisition (Δfur), encoding the regulatory system of virulence components (ΔphoP and ΔphoQ), or containing mutations in DNA recombination and repair genes (Δcya/crpF), in the cAMP receptor protein (Δcrp) regulated through an araC P BAD cassette [47]. Thus, the expression of these genes is regulated by arabinose or mannose supplementation, occurring only during in vitro growth [49]. After colonization of lymphoid tissues, the associated proteins stop being synthesized, because there is no presence of mannose or arabinose in vivo [50]. Therefore, attenuation manifests gradually in vivo, preventing the induction of disease symptoms and promoting the desired antigen-specific immune response.
Furthermore, programed bacterial cell lysis prevents the release of non-secreted protein antigens and DNA, contributing to biocontainment by ensuring the death of the candidate strain after colonization of immune tissues [17,47]. The system controls the expression of enzymes necessary for the synthesis of two components of the peptidoglycan layer of the cell wall, diaminopimelic acid (DAP) and muramic acid. DAP synthesis is regulated by aspartate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (encoded by asd), and UDP-N-acetylglucosamine enolpyruvyl transferase (encoded by murA) [44]. This expression was also engineered to be controlled by exogenous arabinose, and its absence resulted in lysis due to the inability to synthesize the cell wall [51].
Another crucial aspect of a vaccine vector containing heterologous antigens is the stability of the plasmid [8]. Regulation of the levels and location of expression of these antigens can have a significant impact on the immunogenicity of the vaccine, potentially reducing colonization capacity and, consequently, immunological efficacy [18]. To address the problem of instability in the chromosomal integration of foreign genes, systems have been developed that include integration of the foreign gene into the bacterial chromosome, optimization of heterologous antigen codons [52], the use of inducible promoters in vivo [51], and systems by which DNA encodes the foreign gene in a suicide vector [44].
Thus, vaccine strains generally incorporate more than one mutation or deletion in genetic constructs, making it possible to eliminate essential genes involved in virulence regulatory systems [45]. This ensures attenuation, prevents virulence reversal, and eliminates potential side effects [53]. Furthermore, these deletions increase the colonization capacity, survival in the mucosal environment, and immunogenicity of RASV vaccine constructs [20,47].

4. Molecular Mechanisms of Immune Stimulation by Recombinant Salmonella

The use of live-attenuated Salmonella strains as vaccine delivery vehicles for heterologous antigens should efficiently cross the epithelial barrier, reach underlying antigen-presenting cells of the MALT, and elicit a robust response [53]. These mutants are capable of establishing limited infection in the host, and during the natural course of this harmless infection, the bacteria deliver a range of in vivo synthesized antigens directly to B and T lymphocytes present in the GALT [54,55].
In general, the antigens that will be presented by RASV colonize internal effector lymphoid tissues without compromising protective functions and integrity [8]. The interaction between Salmonella and its hosts begins with several virulence factors. Among these, type III secretion systems include Salmonella pathogenicity islands 1 and 2 (SPI-1 and SPI-2) [56]. In epithelial cells, T3SS effectors are essential for the invasion and establishment of intracellular phagosomes [54]. One pathway is linked to the invasion of host cells (T3SS-1) and the other is induced only after invasion, for modulation in the intracellular environment [55]. The SPI-1 encoded system ensures that Salmonella initiates invasion into various lymphoid tissues associated with the mucosa of the intestine, nasopharynx and bronchi [17]. Bacterial internalization is accompanied by changes in host cell signaling pathways, affecting several vital cellular processes, including membrane trafficking, cell division, antigen presentation and cytokine production [53].
Salmonella adapted to the mucosal surface environment begins the infection process, remaining in membrane-bound vacuoles, and after reaching the mesenteric lymph nodes in antigen-presenting cells, they produce recombinant proteins [53]. Antigen delivery results in a generalized immune response that targets intestinal sensory cells, known as Peyer's patch M cells [44]. These cells play a key role in stimulating mucosal immune responses [57]. Furthermore, Salmonella spp. can be taken up by phagocytic cells and cross the reticulo-endothelial system, thereby stimulating systemic immune responses [58]. Salmonella efficiently targets MALT and induces local and systemic immunity [12,59]. Dendritic cells, neutrophils, and macrophages are stimulated in response to antigens presented in MALT, and recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) and endogenous danger-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), such as T3SS-1 and fimbriae, among other adhesins surface bacteria [58].
Protein antigens are processed and presented through the major histocompatibility complex (MHC), stimulating T cell responses [57]. The signaling and activation of phagocytic cells triggers a fundamental immune response to establish connections between the innate and adaptive immune systems [60]. Salmonella preferentially resides in macrophages, and activation of these cells by interferon gamma (IFN-γ) produced by Th1 cells plays a prominent role in bacterial killing [56]. IFN-γ, also known as macrophage activating factor (MAF), influences the duration of macrophage activation and plays an important role in infection. Secretion of IFN-γ depends on IL-18, also known as IFN-γ-inducing factor, and is essential for establishing an early host resistance to Salmonella infection [61]. During primary and secondary infection, Salmonella is dependent on IL-12, IFN-γ, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α).
Classical activation by bacterial LPS or IFN-γ leads to alteration of the cells' secretory profile through the production of organic nitrate compounds, such as nitric oxide (NO) [58]. The responses of mucosal DCs to inflammatory stimuli may maximize their ability to preselect antigens expressed by recombinant Salmonella for specific T and B cells [62]. Alternative activation by IL-4, IL-10 or IL-13 leads to the production of polyamines and proline, inducing proliferation. The presence of Salmonella in these cells leads to the secretion of cytokines and an inflammatory reaction or programed cell death through apoptosis [58].
After exposure to specific cytokines, dendritic cells undergo classical (Th1) or alternative (Th2) activation [54]. Cytokines regulate the host's innate and adaptive immune responses. They have various effects on host cells during infection [58]. Furthermore, RASV regularly produces recombinant protein for a suitable period under the control of SPI-2 conditions and is then translocated into the cytosol via SPI-2 T3SS [63]. Secreted peptides are processed and present to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II for stimulation of T cell responses [58]. Immunization with attenuated vaccines is an effective and safe method to stimulate the production of both serum and mucosal antibodies against the Salmonella carrier and the foreign [12,64].

5. Salmonella as a Vaccine Vector against Different Pathogens

The effective immune response and protection induced by live-attenuated recombinant Salmonella has been described in several studies using parasitic, bacterial, and viral antigens. The reviewed articles were compiled in tables 1, 2 and 3 and presented in a detailed list of heterologous bacterial, parasitic and viral antigens, respectively expressed in different strains of Salmonella, as well as the model of attenuation used, route and dose administered, immune response induced, and animal model used. This is a summary of information published to date regarding the use of recombinant attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium vaccine (RASV) as a vaccine vector. The potential of RASV is evident, and it requires further exploration.

5.1. Recombinant Salmonella Expressing Bacterial Antigens

Several studies were reviewed and summarized in Table 1, which presents the different Salmonella strains, routes, doses, animal models and the type of immune response stimulated. RASV, which contains chromosomal fusion genes encoding the secretion signal for the SPI-2 effector protein, SspH2, and the pathogenic outer membrane lipoprotein from Leptospira, LipL32, was administered orally to mice. The animals received a dose of 1 × 107 colony forming units (CFU)/per mouse of different strains of S. Typhimurium (ST) or saline (PBS) alone on days 0, 14, and 28. After vaccination, the group that received RASV exhibited significantly elevated titers of total immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) specific to the rLipL32 protein, with detectable levels persisting up to 77 days post-vaccination. Notably, following the third immunization on day 28, the anti-LipL32 antibody titers in mice immunized with RASV were significantly higher than those in mice that received only PBS (P < 0.05). Additionally, to assess the cellular immune response, there was a significant increase in the production of the LipL32-specific cytokines IFN-γ and IL-4 in splenocytes from mice vaccinated with RASV compared to the control group treated with PBS (P < 0.05) [57].
Other RASV using Salmonella Typhimurium that expresses the R2 antigen of NrdF from Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae was orally inoculated into mice at a dose of 109 CFU, with two more boosters at the same dose. In this study, a mucosal IgA-type immune response was elicited in lung washings, but not a significant level of NrdF-specific serum IgG [65]. Interestingly, Chen et al. [68] demonstrated that a DNA vaccine with a eukaryotic expression plasmid, encoding the M. hyopneumoniae NrdF antigen administered orally to mice with a dose of 2 × 108 CFU and a booster dose of 3 × 108 CFU, through an S. Typhimurium live-attenuated aroA induced significant NrdF-specific IFN-γ production. Although mice orally vaccinated with S. Typhimurium expressing NrdF encoded by a prokaryotic expression plasmid failed to induce a serum or secretory antibody response specific to NrdF, and IFN-γ was not produced [68]. In another study conducted by Chen and colleagues [67], used a RASV of S. Typhimurium, and the gene of interest was cloned into both eukaryotic and prokaryotic expression vectors. Immunogenicity was assessed in mice orally immunized with M. hyopneumoniae P97R1 adhesin, which induced specific Th1 cellular immune responses in a mouse model. However, no mucosal antibody responses against P97R1 were observed.
In the delivery system of S. Typhimurium expressing important fimbriae of Escherichia coli F4 (K88), F5 (K99), F6 (987Ps) and F41 and intimin adhesin in a murine model with a single dose or double dose of 2 × 109 CFU in 20 µL, IgG and IgA titers for individual adhesins in all immunized groups were higher in the booster dose group than in the single dose group [71]. In another study, Hur, Stein & Lee [70] expressed other recombinant E. coli fimbrial antigens K88ab, K88ac, FedA and FedF also in live-attenuated S. Typhimurium. The IgG2a titer was increased in the one-dose group, whereas both the IgG2a and IgG1 titers were increased in the two-dose group. Furthermore, vaccine strains were not detected in the feces excreted from immunized mice. Hur and Lee [63] evaluated the immune responses of various doses of Salmonella ghost (non-living, devoid of cytoplasmic content, maintaining their cellular morphology), with controlled expression of the φX174 E lysis gene in pigs. These bacterial ghosts carried enterotoxigenic E. coli fimbrial antigens (ETEC) to protect against colibacillosis of piglets. All groups were orally immunized with doses of 2 × 109, 2 × 1010 and 2 × 1011 CFU in 10 mL PBS and boosted at weeks 11 and 14 of pregnancy. Serum levels of immunoglobulin Ig G and IgG and IgA in the colostrum of sows and the serum levels of the groups that received 2 × 1010 and 2 × 1011 CFU were significantly higher than those of sows in the control group. Notably, after challenge with wild-type ETEC, piglet diarrhea and mortality were not observed.
Using live-attenuated S. Typhimurium JOL912, which contains the genes encoding P fimbriae, (pap gene cluster), the iron-regulated aerobactin receptor iutA, and CS31A surface antigen adhesin from avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) evaluated the vaccine against APEC infection in chickens. The vaccine was administered orally, intramuscularly or subcutaneously, using different doses and divided into three groups: no vaccine, a single vaccine dose, and another that received primary and booster immunizations. The birds were challenged intra-air sac with a virulent APEC strain with 107 UFC, and the group that received two vaccine doses showed greater protection against the challenge (80%). Furthermore, it showed significantly increases in plasma IgG levels in the third and fourth weeks old compared to birds from other groups, reinforcing the use of two vaccine doses [74]. Lee and colleagues [75] reported that after a challenge with a virulent APEC strain, the vaccinated group had no deaths, while the control group had a mortality rate of 15%. Thus, the administration of primary and booster vaccination with the Salmonella-delivered APEC vaccine candidate significantly elevated by the generation antigen-specific sIgA, the production of IFN-γ, IL-6 and IL-2 and which protected chickens against colibacillosis. In another study, Oh et al. [77], used the P fimbria subunit, PapA from APEC, which was in live-attenuated S. Typhimurium. Furthermore, they used the non-toxic B subunits of CT (CTB) and LT (LTB) as adjuvants in the vaccine formulation. The study used mice and inoculated 20 µL containing 2 × 109 CFU. PapA-specific serum IgG and mucosal IgA titers increased significantly when mice received the recombinant Salmonella vaccine in the presence of LTB or CTB adjuvants. Rapid declines in immune responses throughout the experimental period were observed in mice immunized without adjuvant.
The benefits of the intracellular action of Salmonella also correlated with natural infection in mucous membranes and, respectively, in the intestinal tract, analogous to one of the most important infection routes of Brucella abortus. Some studies have developed safer experimental vaccines for use, Kim et al. [29], used live-attenuated S. Typhimurium expressing BCSP31, Omp3b and SOD proteins from B. abortus. Mice were divided equally into three groups, one group received intraperitoneally with 1.2 × 106 CFU/mL in 100 μL of the vector, containing only Salmonella as a control; two groups received 1.2 × 109 CFU/mL of the mixture of three strains delivered in 10 μL orally and another group with a dose of 1.2 × 106 CFU/mL of the mixture in 100 μL intramuscularly. The recombinant vaccine obtained serum concentrations of IgG, TNF-α and IFN-γ via the oral route (except Omp3b) and intramuscularly, higher than the control. A robust IFN-γ-mediated response helps eliminate Brucella infection in the host. Furthermore, they found that after a challenge with a virulent strain of B. abortus, the vaccine was able to limit the colonization of the bacteria in the spleen of mice.
Another study targeting brucellosis in goats, Leya and colleagues [24], developed a S. Typhimurium vaccine expressing four (BLS, PrpA, Omp19, and SOD) heterologous Brucella antigens and inoculated them subcutaneously at two different inoculation levels; 5 × 109 CFU/mL (Group B) and 5 × 1010 CFU/mL (Group C). The goats were challenged the inoculations with virulent B. abortus, 6 weeks after immunization. Serum IgG titers against individual antigens in goats immunized with recombinant Salmonella (Group C) were significantly higher than those in non-immunized goats and the vector control group. After antigenic stimulation, levels of IFN-γ of peripheral blood mononuclear cells were significantly elevated in Groups B and C compared to the vector control Group. The immunized goats showed a significantly higher level of protection (P < 0.05) in the group with the highest dose (group C), however, the group with the lower dose was also able to reduce the lesions of microgranuloma foci in the livers of goats, induced by infection by B. abortus. Stable and group [97] reported the use of the Salmonella Cholerasuis chi 3781 (SC) strain expressing the BCSP31 protein from B. abortus, by oral via, in pigs and mice stimulated a strong serum IgG to both the recombinant protein and SC in mice. In contrast, orally inoculated pigs did not develop significant serum or intestinal antibody responses.

5.2. Recombinant Salmonella Expressing Virus Antigens

Live-attenuated strains of Salmonella, including, in most of studies reviewed in this article, S. Typhimurium, but also S. Galinarium, S. Choleraesuis and S. Pullorum, have been evaluated for use as live vaccines for delivery of a variety of viral antigens (Table 2). Among the targets studied were the hemagglutinin gene (HA1) from one of the avian influenza viruses (AIV or HPAI) of the H5N1 subtype. Liljebjelke and group [103] reported the use of S. Typhimurium expressing AIV HA1 as an oral vaccine carrier in birds with doses of 109 CFU. Animals were challenged with homologous A/whooper swan/Mongolia/3/2005 - (CQ95) or heterologous A/Chicken/Queretaro/14588-19/95 - (WM05) strains of the HPAI virus. Groups receiving the recombinant vaccine demonstrated a statistically significant increase in survival compared with control groups (100%) for the low-dose homologous challenge with CQ95 and partial protection against the low-dose challenge with WM05. Neither vaccine provided protection to chickens when challenged with high doses of either HPAI virus, although survival was better against challenge with CQ95 (60%). The presence of antibodies that recognize the HA protein in serum and probe samples was assessed by the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay and collected 2 weeks after vaccination. Furthermore, Jazayeri and collaborators [104], reported the use of this glycoprotein HA, NA and NP, from AIV also being expressed in live-attenuated S. Typhimurium SV4089, administered orally in birds with the same dose as the previous study. With detection using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), Salmonella was specifically identified using a genus-specific probe, Sal3, from homogenized sections of the spleen, liver, and cecum of infected chickens, where a distinct fluorescent signal of rod-shaped bacteria could be detected. They achieved successful elimination of Salmonella from the spleen and liver of infected birds, but it was still detectable in the cecum even 35 days after inoculation, demonstrating that live-attenuated S. Typhimurium provides an alternative in terms of in vitro stability of the transfected plasmid.
Another study using the avian influenza virus, this time using subtype H9N2, two attenuated strains of S. Typhimurium was constructed with the O antigen of LPS intact (smooth strain), whereas in the other the O antigen was eliminated (rough strain), an important immunodominant antigen of Salmonella, and its removal can lead to increased immunogenicity of outer membrane proteins and other surface antigens. The objective of these constructions was to determine whether, as a transporter Salmonella could affect immune responses against the delivered antigens. The experiment was performed with oral therapy in an avian model using recombinant Salmonella expressing H9N2 hemagglutinin (HA). They evaluated the effect of preexisting anti-Salmonella immunity on the subsequent elicitation of HA-specific immune responses. They also found that oral immunization with the S-HA or R-HA strain elicited comparable HA-specific immune responses, as indicated by serum IgG and HI titers. These results suggest that deletion of the O antigen does not affect the immunogenicity and delivery properties of the Salmonella system [30]. In addition, with subtype H9N2, Hajam and group [109] used S. Gallinarum (SG) for the expression and delivery of HA1, HA2 and/or the conserved ectodomain of matrix protein 2 (M2e). In this study, the efficacy of these RASV of SG based H9N2 vaccine strains was compared with that of the commercially available oil-adjuvanted inactivated H9N2 full-virus vaccine in a chicken model. In search of a cheaper vaccine, and without the use of exogenous adjuvants, the experiment vaccinated chickens with a single dose, orally at a dose of 109 CFU, in groups with individual H9N2 genes in SG, or as a mixture of these, and the control was vaccinated intramuscularly with the inactivated commercial H9N2 vaccine. In the indirect ELISA for IgY with serum samples collected on days 14 and 28 post-vaccination, animals vaccinated with RASV or mixture of vaccine strains showed specific systemic responses to HA1 comparable to those significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those in the control group. Cytokine gene expression revealed that IFN-γ increased by over 4 times (P < 0.05) in all groups inoculated with RASV constructs compared to the PBS control group. However, for the HA1 and HA2 genes the commercial vaccine induced significantly greater responses but was not as robust for M2 when compared to the RASV. Upon challenge, chickens immunized with both vaccines exhibited comparable lung inflammation and viral loads although both were significantly lower than those in the group vaccinated with SG alone. However, the groups immunized with the RASV managed to efficiently inhibit the infection and spread of H9N2.
Another focus of using orally administered vaccines was to combat duck enteritis virus (DEV), an acute disease that affects ducks, geese and swans, and other free-living aquatic birds, with high mortality. Yu and group [113] used live-attenuated S. Typhimurium (SL7207) with E. coli LTB as an adjuvant, fused to the DEV UL24 gene in ducks. Birds were orally inoculated with SL7207 (pVAX-UL24) or SL7207 (pVAX-LTB-UL24) with 1×1010 CFU. Immunization of animals with the recombinant LTB vaccine showed superior protective efficacy (60-80%) against a lethal DEV challenge, compared to the limited survival rate (40%) of those immunized with the vaccine without the adjuvant. Corroborating this study, Liu and colleagues [114] orally immunized ducks with S. Typhimurium S739 expressing the DEV genes and used adjuvants (LTB subunit and duck DuIL-2 gene). During lethal challenge, 90% of animals that were immunized with recombinant Salmonella and LTB adjuvant, were protected after an initial booster immunization. The IgY levels were slightly higher against the tUL24 protein in ducks vaccinated with UL24-LTB and UL24-DuIL-2 on days 10, 21, and 28 after the first immunization compared to other groups (P < 0.05). Serum levels of IgY and bile IgA in response to purified DEV were slightly lower than those in response to the tUL24 protein. However, higher serum IgY titers against DEV were detected in ducks vaccinated with UL24 and tgB compared to those receiving tUL24 (P < 0.05). Similarly, among all treated groups, the highest levels of bile IgA were found in ducks vaccinated with the attenuated Salmonella-DEV DNA recombinant vaccine. Although the two adjuvants stimulated a high immune response in ducks, the group vaccinated with recombinant Salmonella and DuIL-2 was not capable of protection against homologous challenge.
The modulation in innate and adaptative immunity by cytokines such as IFN-α appears to be useful as a first line of defense against viral infections, but the use of cytokines in livestock farming has a high cost for mass production and administration. Kim and group [120]( tested the efficacy of live-attenuated S. Typhimurium engineered to secrete porcine IFN-α (swIFN-α) protein to prevent clinical signs caused by transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) infection, one of the causes of economic losses in the swine industry. The vaccine was administered orally at a dose of 109 and 1011 CFU/pig, reducing the severit tested the efficacy of live-attenuated S. Typhimurium engineered to secrete porcine IFN-α (swIFN-α) protein to prevent clinical signs caused by transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) infection, one of the causes of economic losses in the swine industry. The vaccine was administered orally at a dose of 109 and 1011 CFU/pig, reducing the severity of clinical signs caused by TGEV infection. To assess the virus's spread in piglets infected with TGEV, the quantity of TGEV in fecal samples collected from the infected piglets was measured. Virus shedding was detected one day after TGEV infection and reached its peak at four days post-infection. However, piglets that received the recombinant vaccine (at doses 109 and 1011 UFC) exhibited reduced viral shedding at four days post-infection. Likewise, the amount of TGEV was lower in the intestinal tissues and mesenteric lymph nodes of piglets inoculated with the recombinant vaccine, when compared to the control, helping to reduce the severity of clinical signs caused by TGEV infection.
In another study, with TGEV, Zhang and collaborators [121] sought to evaluate experimental vaccine delivered by live-attenuated S. Typhimurium expressing the structural protein of the virus, which is correlated with another virus, which causes swine epidemic diarrhea (PEDV). These viruses are members of the Coronaviridae family, and both viruses can cause severe enteropathogenic diarrhea in pigs, therefore, the simultaneous induction of immune responses is promising for the food industry. Piglets were immunized orally with recombinant Salmonella at a dosage of 1.6 × 1011 CFU/per piglet and then immunized with a booster of 2 × 1011 CFU. The group that received the RASV with two S proteins from TGEV and PEDV simultaneously stimulated immune responses against both viruses after oral immunization. The antibody levels against PEDV or TGEV in piglets immunized with the RASV of S. Typhimurium began to increase at 2 weeks, but the difference compared to controls was not statistically significant until the sixth week. Serum IgG levels against PEDV or TGEV were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in piglets immunized with the recombinant vaccine than with PBS or empty vector from weeks 4 to 8. Significantly elevated levels of IgG and IgA antibodies against PEDV and TGEV were induced in the RASV week 6, albeit slightly lower than those induced by the monogenic vaccine and empty vector. The results showed that T lymphocyte proliferation levels increased to a statistically significant level compared to the control group in weeks 4 to 6, being higher in piglets immunized with RASV when compared to other vaccine groups, but no significant differences were observed (P > 0.05). The results also indicated that IFN-γ and IL-4 levels in piglets treated with RASV were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in control groups.

5.3. Recombinant Salmonella Expressing Parasite Antigen

The protective mechanisms required to combat parasites differ significantly from those for other pathogens, and parasites can actively suppress the host's immune response [132]. This has made it challenging to identify an effective combination of antigens, adjuvants, and routes of administration for vaccination [132,133]. However, recent years have seen notable advances in the development of vaccines utilizing recombinant antigens from these parasites, although studies in this area remain limited [133].
In this review, we compiled 14 articles (Table 3) that investigate the use of attenuated strains of Salmonella engineered to express parasite antigens. These attenuated strains are particularly attractive as live vectors because they can elicit strong mucosal immunity, which is crucial for controlling certain parasites, such as Trichinella spiralis, at the intestinal mucosa [133]. Pompa-Mera and collaborators [31] used S. Typhimurium SL3261 and inserted a fusion glycoprotein from T. spiralis larvae. The vaccine was administered intranasally at a dose of 1× 108 CFU in BALB/c mice. Mice immunized intranasally with recombinant Salmonella, after challenge reduced the parasite load of adult T. spiralis by 61.83% on the eighth day post-infection, inducing a protective immune response. This immune response was characterized by the induction of antigen-specific IgG1 and IL-5 production. In another study using T. spiralis, the Ts87 gene was attenuated to strain S. Typhimurium SL7207, administered only orally in mice. They also reported a statistically significant 29.8% reduction in adult worm burden and a 34.2% reduction in larvae following T. Spiralis larvae challenge, compared with mice immunized with empty Salmonella or a PBS control. However, mice that received the recombinant Salmonella vaccine exhibited elevated levels of IgG2a and IgG1 subclass antibodies, with no significant difference (P > 0.05) between IgG2a and IgG1 levels, indicating a mixed Th1/Th2 immune response. Additionally, there was a notable increase (P < 0.05) in total intestinal IgA levels among mice immunized with the recombinant vaccine compared to those in the vector or PBS-alone groups. Another important parasite for veterinary medicine is the cestode Echinococcus granulosus (EgDf1), which infects the intestines of dogs, in addition to having intermediate hosts such as herbivorous and omnivorous animals, and accidentally, humans. Chabalgoity and group [134], produced a vaccine with fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) of EgDf1 fusion with a C-terminal fragment of tetanus toxin (TetC) expressed in S. Typhimurium LVR01. The inoculation was intravenous with a dose of 106 CFU, as well as an oral dose with 4 × 109 CFU in mice eliciting an antibody response to EgDf1 and the production of Th1-related antigen-specific cytokines, and significant levels of a Th2 cytokine protein in the spleen cells of orally immunized mice. Furthermore, sera from immune mice reacted strongly with fixed sections of the larval stage of the worm. Another study by the group using in S. Typhimurium LVR01 expressing EgDf1 FABP, in dogs, orally vaccinated at a dose of 5 × 1010 CFU in 2 mL of PBS, or PBS alone. The dogs presented IgG antibodies responses against EgDf1 in the immunized with LVR01 (pTECH±EgDf1). All animals developed high titers of IgG antibodies against LPS in serum by week 4 after a single dose of the recombinant vaccine [48].
Cong and colleagues [141] evaluated a vaccine using live-attenuated S. Typhimurium as a delivery vector for the recombinant eukaryotic plasmid pSAG1-2/CTA2/B, which expresses a multiantigenic gene encoding SAG1 and SAG2 from Toxoplasma gondii linked to the A2/B subunits of cholera toxin (CTA2/B) via oral administration in mice. Levels of anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies were detected in animals that received S. Typhimurium delivering the recombinant plasmid expressing the SAG1/SAG2 surface antigen. IgG anti-T. gondii values increased in the group immunized with the CTA2/B subunits, compared with those of the negative controls (P = 0.003, P = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference in anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies between mice immunized with or without CTA2/B as a genetic adjuvant. The group vaccinated without the adjuvant obtained a strong Th2 response; however, with the CTA2/B adjuvant, the T. gondii-specific response was predominantly Th1. When immunized mice were intraperitoneally challenged with 103 tachyzoite of the virulent strain of T. gondii, the survival time of mice immunized with the vaccine with CTA2/B adjuvant was longer than that of other vaccine groups (P = 0.003), and a survival rate of 40% was achieved.
In another study, Cong and colleagues [22] used live-attenuated S. Typhimurium to deliver a vaccine encoding several epitopes derived from tachyzoite proteins SAG1, GRA1, ROP2, GRA4, and bradyzoite proteins SAG2C, SAG2X of T. gondii, along with (CTA2/B). This live-attenuated recombinant Salmonella vaccine was evaluated for BALB/c mice administered via the oral and nasal routes or by intramuscular injection, using plasmids named (pVAX1-MEG-CTX A 2 /B). The higher levels of anti-T. gondii were detected in the serum of mice immunized orally and nasally than in the serum of mice injected intramuscularly with RASV (P < 0.05). CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets in immunized mice were analyzed by flow cytometry, resulting in 28.54 ± 0.92% and 30.01 ± 1.78%, respectively, in mice immunized intramuscularly and intranasally. Cytokines released in the culture of mice vaccinated with the RASV intramuscularly demonstrated a preferential production of IFN-γ and IL-2, significantly higher than in the control groups (p < 0.05). However, they were significantly lower compared to animals immunized orally and intranasally with RASV (P = 0.02). The levels of IL-4 and IL-5 produced by the immunized mice were low, and there were no statistically significant differences between the vaccinated groups and control groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the proliferation activity of antigen-specific lymphocytes was significantly increased in the oral and intranasal immunization groups compared to the intramuscular immunization group (P < 0.05). Four weeks after the last immunization, mice were challenged with 100 μL of 1 × 103 tachyzoite of the T. gondii strain intraperitoneally. All control mice died. Although there was a survival rate of 20% (2/10) for mice immunized with the pVAX1-MEG-CTXA2/B plasmid intramuscularly. The RASV intranasal immunization had a survival rate of 40% (4/10) after 10 days. The highest survival rate of 60% (6/10) was achieved in mice orally immunized with the RASV.
Benitez, McNair, and Mead [142] utilized strains of live-attenuated S. Typhimurium expressing Cp23 and Cp40 from Cryptosporidium parvum, recognized as surface immunodominant antigens, as they are acknowledged by serum antibodies from humans and many other animals. In the study, mice were orally immunized with 5 × 109 CFU/mouse 0.2 mL of PBS intragastrically for each vaccine, which included a vector with an empty plasmid, RASV vaccine expressing the Cp23 gene, and another for the CP40 gene. Two booster doses, consisting of 100 μg of RASV, were injected subcutaneously on days 0 and 14, followed by oral immunization against Salmonella. The production of IgG and IgG1 subclasses was observed in vaccinated mice after 7 weeks of immunization. Specific serum levels of anti-Cp23 and anti-Cp40 IgG were significantly increased in mice immunized with the RASV vaccine compared to mice immunized with the control vector. IgA titers in mice immunized with RASV expressing Cp23, but not in animals immunized with the Cp40 construct (P > 0.05). Only an IgG1 antibody response was obtained, with no IgG2a response, suggesting a Th2-type response was elicited.
Another vaccine using live-attenuated S. Typhimurium was studied by Chen and colleagues [143]. They employed active promoters within the intracellular environment of antigen-presenting cells, such nitrite reductase B (nirB) and phoP activated gene C (pagC) or pMohly, to express the bivalent antigen Sj23LHD-GST from Schistosoma japonicum through the Salmonella type III secretion system or α-hemolysin. Mice were orally immunized with 0.2 mL of PBS containing 109 CFUs for the vaccine groups: recombinant S. Typhimurium and the empty vector pQE30, with a negative control receiving only PBS. Three doses were administered at two-week intervals. The Sj23LHD-GST antigen induced a moderate level of IgG in mice immunized with S. Typhimurium containing the nirB promoter. Unlike the total IgG level, the IgG2a:IgG1 ratio in mice immunized with S. Typhimurium harboring the nirB promoter was the highest. The predominant presence of the IgG2a isotype strongly suggests that the strain with nirB triggered a Th1-type specific response. The expression of CD44 in splenocytes of mice immunized with the RASV of S. Typhimurium was increased (25 ± 2%) when delivered by the Salmonella type III secretion system driven by the nirB promoter, which was significantly higher than that found in mice immunized with strains of S. Typhimurium containing the pagC promoter (12±1%) or pMohly1 (11±1%) or vector (11±1%) (P < 0.01). The mice were challenged with S. japonicum cercariae by penetration into the abdominal skin and examined for worm and egg burdens in the mesenteric vein and liver six weeks after challenge. Recombinant strains of S. Typhimurium containing the pagC, nirB, or pMohly1 promoters caused a reduction of 30.07%, 57.71%, and 40.46% reduction in the number of eggs. Moreover, animals immunized by the prime-boost method with protein driven by the nirB promoter, delivered by the Salmonella type III secretion system, caused a reduction in parasite burden by 51.35% and 62.59% in S. japonicum egg burden, significantly higher than that of recombinant protein alone or before boosting. These results demonstrate the in vivo protective efficacy of antigens delivered by the Salmonella type III secretion system driven by the nirB promoter.

6. Conclusion and Future Directions

The development and commercialization of RASVs represent a significant advancement in veterinary medicine. These vaccines offer a safe and effective means of controlling infectious diseases in livestock, reducing the reliance on antibiotics and mitigating the risks associated with antibiotic resistance. The ability of RASVs to deliver antigens from a wide range of pathogens makes them versatile tools for disease prevention.
Looking forward, future research should focus on optimizing vaccine formulations and delivery methods, particularly for ruminants and other species where oral administration remains a challenge. Additionally, there is potential to expand the use of RASVs beyond veterinary applications, with possible implications for human medicine, particularly in the context of zoonotic diseases.
The studies reviewed here highlight the promise of RASVs as part of an integrated approach to managing infectious diseases in animal populations. Continued investment in research and development will be essential to fully realize the potential of these vaccines and to address the challenges that remain.

Author Contributions

D.B.C., F.D.S.S., N.R.d.O., T.L.O.B. and O.A.D. contributed to the conception and design of the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Funding

This research received no external funding. Scholarships were funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES) (Finance Code 001).

Data Availability Statement

No new data was created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Roth, J.; Sandbulte, M. The Role of Veterinary Vaccines in Livestock Production, Animal Health. In Veterinary Vaccines: Principles and Applications; Metwally, S., Idrissi, A.E., Viljoen, G., Eds.; Wiley: Hudson County, NJ, USA, 2021; ISBN 9781119506287. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shaji, S.; Selvaraj, R.K.; Shanmugasundaram, R. Salmonella Infection in Poultry: A Review on the Pathogen and Control Strategies. Microorganisms 2023, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kuria, J.K.N. Salmonellosis in Food and Companion Animals and Its Public Health Importance. IntechOpen 2023.
  4. Zanella, J.R.C. Zoonoses Emergentes e Reemergentes e Sua Importância Para Saúde e Produção Animal. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 2016, 51, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Roth, J.A. Veterinary Vaccines and Their Importance to Animal Health and Public Health. Procedia Vaccinol 2011, 5, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Laxminarayan, R.; Duse, A.; Wattal, C.; Zaidi, A.K.M.; Wertheim, H.F.L.; Sumpradit, N.; Vlieghe, E.; Hara, G.L.; Gould, I.M.; Goossens, H.; et al. Antibiotic Resistance-the Need for Global Solutions. Lancet Infect Dis 2013, 13, 1057–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morrison, L.; Zembower, T.R. Antimicrobial Resistance. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2020, 30, 619–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Clark-Curtiss, J.E.; Curtiss, R. Salmonella Vaccines: Conduits for Protective Antigens. The Journal of Immunology 2018, 200, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jorge, S.; Dellagostin, O.A. The Development of Veterinary Vaccines: A Review of Traditional Methods and Modern Biotechnology Approaches. Biotechnology Research and Innovation 2017, 1, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. de Oliveira, N.R.; Santos, F.D.S.; dos Santos, V.A.C.; Maia, M.A.C.; Oliveira, T.L.; Dellagostin, O.A. Challenges and Strategies for Developing Recombinant Vaccines against Leptospirosis: Role of Expression Platforms and Adjuvants in Achieving Protective Efficacy. Pathogens 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Singh, B.R. Salmonella Vaccines for Animals and Birds and Their Future Perspective. Open Vaccine J 2009, 2, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gayet, R.; Bioley, G.; Rochereau, N.; Paul, S.; Corthésy, B. Vaccination against Salmonella Infection: The Mucosal Way. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 2017, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Amagliani, G.; La Guardia, M.E.; Dominici, S.; Brandi, G.; Omiccioli, E. Salmonella abortusovis: An Epidemiologically Relevant Pathogen. Curr Microbiol 2022, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Soliani, L.; Rugna, G.; Prosperi, A.; Chiapponi, C.; Luppi, A. Salmonella Infection in Pigs: Disease, Prevalence, and a Link between Swine and Human Health. Pathogens 2023, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Velasquez-Munoz, A.; Castro-Vargas, R.; Cullens-Nobis, F.M.; Mani, R.; Abuelo, A. Review: Salmonella Dublin in Dairy Cattle. Front Vet Sci 2023, 10, 103389/fvets20231331767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Young, M.K.; Cox, M.M.; Calhoun, L.N. Salmonella-Based Vaccines for Infectious Diseases. Expert Rev Vaccines 2007, 6, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, S.; Kong, Q.; Curtiss, R. New Technologies in Developing Recombinant Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine Vectors. Microb Pathog 2013, 58, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Galen, J.E.; Curtiss, R. The Delicate Balance in Genetically Engineering Live Vaccines. Vaccine 2014, 32, 4376–4385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cardenas, L.; Clements, J.D. Oral Immunization Using Live Attenuated Salmonella spp. as Carriers of Foreign Antigens. Clin Microbiol Rev 1992, 5, 328–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Roland, K.L.; Kong, Q.; Jiang, Y. Attenuated Salmonella for Oral Immunization. In Mucosal Vaccines: Innovation for Preventing Infectious Diseases; Kiyono, H., Pascual, D.W., Eds.; Academic Press, 2020; pp. 383–399 ISBN 9780128119242. [CrossRef]
  21. Shin, H.; La, T.M.; Lee, H.J.; Kim, T.; Song, S.U.U.; Park, E.; Park, G.H.; Choi, I.S.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, J.B.; et al. Evaluation of Immune Responses and Protective Efficacy of a Novel Live Attenuated Salmonella enteritidis Vaccine Candidate in Chickens. Vaccines (Basel) 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cong, H.; Yuan, Q.; Zhao, Q.; Zhao, L.; Yin, H.; Zhou, H.; He, S.; Wang, Z. Comparative Efficacy of a Multi-Epitope DNA Vaccine via Intranasal, Peroral, and Intramuscular Delivery against Lethal Toxoplasma gondii Infection in Mice. Parasit Vectors 2014, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hajam, I.A.; Kim, J.; Lee, J.H. Oral Immunization with a Novel Attenuated Salmonella gallinarum Encoding Infectious Bronchitis Virus Spike Protein Induces Protective Immune Responses against Fowl Typhoid and Infectious Bronchitis in Chickens. Vet Res 2018, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Leya, M.; Kim, W.K.; Cho, J.S.; Yu, E.C.; Kim, Y.J.; Yeo, Y.; Lyoo, K.S.; Yang, M.S.; Han, S.S.; Lee, J.H.; et al. Vaccination of Goats with a Combination Salmonella Vector Expressing Four Brucella Antigens (BLS, PrpA, Omp19, and SOD) Confers Protection against Brucella abortus Infection. J Vet Sci 2018, 19, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lyimu, W.M.; Leta, S.; Everaert, N.; Paeshuyse, J. Influence of Live Attenuated Salmonella Vaccines on Cecal Microbiome Composition and Microbiota Abundances in Young Broiler Chickens. Vaccines (Basel) 2023, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Peeters, L.; Dewulf, J.; Boyen, F.; Brossé, C.; Vandersmissen, T.; Rasschaert, G.; Heyndrickx, M.; Cargnel, M.; Mattheus, W.; Pasmans, F.; et al. Bacteriological Evaluation of Vaccination against Salmonella Typhimurium with an Attenuated Vaccine in Subclinically Infected Pig Herds. Prev Vet Med 2020, 182, 104687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Won, G.; Lee, J.H. F18+ Escherichia coli Flagellin Expression in Salmonella Has Immunoadjuvant Effects in a Ghost Vaccine Candidate Containing E. coli Stx2eB, FedF and FedA against Porcine Edema Disease. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2018, 58, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, Y.A.; Ji, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Salmonella enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Vector Delivering SaoA Antigen Confers Protection against Streptococcus suis Serotypes 2 and 7 in Mice and Pigs. Vet Res 2017, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, W.K.; Moon, J.Y.; Kim, S.; Hur, J. Comparison between Immunization Routes of Live Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Strains Expressing BCSP31, Omp3b, and SOD of Brucella abortus in Murine Model. Front Microbiol 2016, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hajam, I.A.; Lee, J.H. Preexisting Salmonella-Specific Immunity Interferes with the Subsequent Development of Immune Responses against the Salmonella Strains Delivering H9N2 Hemagglutinin. Vet Microbiol 2017, 205, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pompa-Mera, E.N.; Yépez-Mulia, L.; Ocaña-Mondragón, A.; García-Zepeda, E.A.; Ortega-Pierres, G.; González-Bonilla, C.R. Trichinella spiralis: Intranasal Immunization with Attenuated Salmonella enterica Carrying a Gp43 Antigen-Derived 30mer Epitope Elicits Protection in BALB/c Mice. Exp Parasitol 2011, 129, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang, L.Y.; Wang, K.Y.; Xiao, D.; Chen, D.F.; Geng, Y.; Wang, J.; He, Y.; Wang, E.L.; Huang, J.L.; Xiao, G.Y. Safety and Immunogenicity of an Oral DNA Vaccine Encoding Sip of Streptococcus agalactiae from Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus Delivered by Live Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium. Fish Shellfish Immunol 2014, 38, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, S.; Hofacre, C.L.; Wanda, S.Y.; Zhou, J.; Callum, R.A.; Nordgren, B.; Curtiss, R. A Triple-Sugar Regulated Salmonella Vaccine Protects against Clostridium perfringens-Induced Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chickens. Poult Sci 2022, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mizuno, T.; Mclennan, M.; Trott, D. Intramuscular Vaccination of Young Calves with a Salmonella Dublin Metabolic-Drift Mutant Provides Superior Protection to Oral Delivery. Vet Res 2008, 39, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Curtiss, R. Vaccines to Control Salmonella in Poultry. Avian Dis 2023, 67, 427–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chatfield Roberts, S.M.; Cropley, I.; Douce, G.; Dougan, G. The Development of Oral Vaccines Based on Live Attenuated Salmonella Strains. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 1993, 7, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Desin, T.S.; Köster, W.; Potter, A.A. Salmonella Vaccines in Poultry: Past, Present and Future. Expert Rev Vaccines 2013, 12, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bearson, S.M.D. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences Salmonella in Swine: Prevalence, Multidrug Resistance, and Vaccination Strategies. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jia, S.; McWhorter, A.R.; Andrews, D.M.; Underwood, G.J.; Chousalkar, K.K. Challenges in Vaccinating Layer Hens against Salmonella Typhimurium. Vaccines (Basel) 2020, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. De Ridder, L.; Maes, D.; Dewulf, J.; Butaye, P.; Pasmans, F.; Boyen, F.; Haesebrouck, F.; Van der Stede, Y. Use of a Live Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Vaccine on Farrow-to-Finish Pig Farms. Veterinary Journal 2014, 202, 303–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Theuß, T.; Ueberham, E.; Lehmann, J.; Lindner, T.; Springer, S. Immunogenic Potential of a Salmonella Typhimurium Live Vaccine for Pigs against Monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium DT 193. BMC Vet Res 2017, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Smith, R.P.; Andres, V.; Martelli, F.; Gosling, B.; Marco-Jimenez, F.; Vaughan, K.; Tchorzewska, M.; Davies, R. Maternal Vaccination as a Salmonella Typhimurium Reduction Strategy on Pig Farms. J Appl Microbiol 2018, 124, 274–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hegazy, W.A.H.; Hensel, M. Salmonella enterica as a Vaccine Carrier. Future Microbiol 2012, 7, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Nakayama, K.; Kelly, S.M.; Curtiss III, R. Construction of an ASD+ Expression-Cloning Vector: Stable Maintenance and High Level Expression of Cloned Genes in a Salmonella Vaccine Strain. Nature 1988, 6, 693–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Roland, K.L.; Brenneman, K.E. Salmonella as a Vaccine Delivery Vehicle. Expert Rev Vaccines 2013, 12, 1033–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Collins, L.V.; A1vrridge, S.; Hackettt, J. Mutations at Rfc or Pmi Attenuate Salmonella Typhimurium Virulence for Mice. Infect Immun 1991, 59, 1079–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Curtiss Iii, R.; Xin, W.; Li, Y.; Kong, W.; Wanda, S.-Y.; Gunn, B.; Wang, S. New Technologies in Using Recombinant Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine Vectors. Crit Rev Immunol 2010, 30, 255–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chabalgoity, J.A.; Moreno, M.; Carol, H.; Dougan, G.; Hormaeche, C.E. Salmonella Typhimurium as a Basis for a Live Oral Echinococcus granulosus Vaccine. Vaccine 2000, 19, 460–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, S.; Kong, Q.; Curtiss, R. New Technologies in Developing Recombinant Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine Vectors. Microb Pathog 2013, 58, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Y.A.; Ji, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Salmonella enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Vector Delivering SaoA Antigen Confers Protection against Streptococcus suis Serotypes 2 and 7 in Mice and Pigs. Vet Res 2017, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chatfield, S.N.; Charles, I.G.; Makoff, A.J.; Oxer, M.D.; Dougan, G.; Pickard, D.; Slater, D.; Fairweather, N.F. Use of the NirB Promoter to Direct the Stable Expression of Heterelogous Antigens in Salmonella Oral Vaccine Strains: Development of a Single-Dose Oral Tetanus Vaccine. Nature 1992, 10, 888–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Baud, D.; Ponci, F.; Bobst, M.; De Grandi, P.; Nardelli-Haefliger, D. Improved Efficiency of a Salmonella -Based Vaccine against Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Virus-Like Particles Achieved by Using a Codon-Optimized Version of L1. J Virol 2004, 78, 12901–12909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhou, G.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Manipulation of Host Immune Defenses by Effector Proteins Delivered from Multiple Secretion Systems of Salmonella and Its Application in Vaccine Research. Front Immunol 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lou, L.; Zhang, P.; Piao, R.; Wang, Y. Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI-1) and Its Complex Regulatory Network. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Malik-Kale, P.; Jolly, C.E.; Lathrop, S.; Winfree, S.; Luterbach, C.; Steele-Mortimer, O. Salmonella- at Home in the Host Cell. Front Microbiol 2011, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Waterman, R.; Holden, D.W.; Waterman, S.R.; Holden, D.W. Pathogenicity Island 2 Type III Secretion SystemS Functions and Effectors of the Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 2 Type III Secretion System; 2003; Vol. 5. [CrossRef]
  57. Samakchan, N.; Thinwang, P.; Boonyom, R. Oral Immunization of Rat with Chromosomal Expression Lipl32 in Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine Induces Immune Respond against Pathogenic Leptospira. Clin Exp Vaccine Res 2021, 10, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hurley, D.; McCusker, M.P.; Fanning, S.; Martins, M. Salmonella-Host Interactions - Modulation of the Host Innate Immune System. Front Immunol 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Sirard, J.-C.; Niedergang, F.; Kraehenbuhl, P.; Sirurd, J.-C.; Kruehenbuhi, J.-P.; Sirard, J.-C. Live Attenuated Salmonella: A Paradigm of Mucosal Vaccines Immunological Reviews. Immunoiogical Reviews 1999, 171, 5–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kawai, T.; Akira, S. The Role of Pattern-Recognition Receptors in Innate Immunity: Update on Toll-like Receptors. Nat Immunol 2010, 11, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Monack, D.M.; Bouley, D.M.; Falkow, S. Salmonella Typhimurium Persists within Macrophages in the Mesenteric Lymph Nodes of Chronically Infected Nramp1+/+ Mice and Can Be Reactivated by IFNγ Neutralization. Journal of Experimental Medicine 2004, 199, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mastroeni, P.; Chabalgoity, J.A.; Dunstan, S.J.; Maskell, D.J.; Dougan, G. Salmonella: Immune Responses and Vaccines. Veterinary Journal 2001, 161, 132–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hur, J.; Lee, J.H. Protective Efficacy by Various Doses of Salmonella ghost Vaccine Carrying Enterotoxigenic Escherichia Coli Fimbrial antigen against Neonatal Piglet Colibacillosis. Can J Vet Res. 2016, 80, 245–249. [Google Scholar]
  64. Tennant, S.M.; Levine, M.M. Live Attenuated Vaccines for Invasive Salmonella Infections. Vaccine 2015, 33, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fagan, P.K.; Djordjevic, S.P.; Chin, J.; Eamens, G.J.; Walker, M.J. Oral Immunization of Mice with Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium AroA Expressing a Recombinant Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Antigen (NrdF). Infect Immun 1997, 65, 2502–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Fagan, P.K.; Walker, M.J.; Chin, J.; Eamens, G.J.; Djordjevic, S.P. Oral Immunization of Swine with Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium AroA SL3261 Expressing a Recombinant Antigen of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (NrDF) Primes the Immune System for a NrDF Specific Secretory IgA Response in the Lungs. Microb Pathog 2001, 30, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chen, A.Y.; Fry, S.R.; Forbes-Faulkner, J.; Daggard, G.; Mukkur, T.K.S. Evaluation of the Immunogenicity of the P97R1 Adhesin of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae as a Mucosal Vaccine in Mice. J Med Microbiol 2006, 55, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chen, A.Y.; Fry, S.R.; Forbes-Faulkner, J.; Daggard, G.E.; Mukkur, T.K.S. Comparative Immunogenicity of M. hyopneumoniae NrdF Encoded in Different Expression Systems Delivered Orally via Attenuated S. Typhimurium AroA in Mice. Vet Microbiol 2006, 114, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Stevenson, G.; Manning, P.A. Galactose Epimeraseless (GalE) Mutant G30 of Salmonella Typhimurium Is a Good Potential Live Oral Vaccine Carrier for Fimbrial Antigens. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1985, 28, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hur, J.; Stein, B.D.; Lee, J.H. A Vaccine Candidate for Post-Weaning Diarrhea in Swine Constructed with a Live Attenuated Salmonella Deliv-Ering Escherichia coli K88ab, K88ac, FedA, and FedF Fimbrial Antigens and Its Immune Responses in a Murine Model. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 2012, 76, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hur, J.; Lee, J.H. Immune Responses to New Vaccine Candidates Constructed by a Live Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium De-Livery System Expressing Escherichia coli F4, F5, F6, F41 and Intimin Adhesin Antigens in a Murine Model. J. Vet. Med. Sci 2011, 73, 1265–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Won, G.; Lee, J.H. Multifaceted Immune Responses and Protective Efficacy Elicited by a Recombinant Autolyzed Salmonella Expressing FliC Flagellar Antigen of F18+ Escherichia coli. Vaccine 2016, 34, 6335–6342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Won, G.; John Hwa, L. Potent Immune Responses Induced by a Salmonella ghost Delivery System That Expresses the Recombinant StX2eB, FedF, and FedA Proteins of the Escherichia coli-Producing F18 and Shiga Toxin in a Murine Model and Evaluation of Its Protective Effect as a Porcine Vaccine Candidate. Veterinary Quarterly 2017, 37, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Chaudhari, A.A.; Matsuda, K.; Lee, J.H. Construction of an Attenuated Salmonella Delivery System Harboring Genes Encoding Various Virulence Factors of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli and Its Potential as a Candidate Vaccine for Chicken Colibacillosis. Avian Dis 2013, 57, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, J.H.; Chaudhari, A.A; Oh, I.G.; Eo, S.K.; Park, S.; Jawale, C.V. Immune Responses to Oral Vaccination with Salmonella-Delivered Pathogenic Escherichia coli Antigens and Protective efficacy against Colibacillosis. The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 2015, 79, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Han, Y.; Liu, Q.; Yi, J.; Liang, K.; Wei, Y.; Kong, Q. A Biologically Conjugated Polysaccharide Vaccine Delivered by Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Provides Protection against Challenge of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli O1 Infection. Pathog Dis 2017, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Oh, I.G.; Jawale, C.; Lee, J. The B Subunits of Cholera and Escherichia coli Heat-Labile Toxins Enhance the Immune Responses in Mice Orally Immunised with a Recombinant Live P-Fimbrial Vaccine for Avian Pathogenic E. coli. Acta Vet Hung 2014, 62, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Stromberg, Z.R.; Van Goor, A.; Redweik, G.A.J.; Mellata, M. Characterization of Spleen Transcriptome and Immunity against Avian Colibacillosis after Immunization with Recombinant Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine Strains. Front Vet Sci 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jiang, Y.; Kulkarni, R.R.; Parreira, V.R.; Poppe, C.; Roland, K.L.; Prescott, J.F. Assessment of 2 Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium-Based Vaccines against Necrotic Enteritis in Reducing Colonization of Chickens by Salmonella Serovars of Different Serogroups. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 2010, 74, 264–270. [Google Scholar]
  80. Kulkarni, R.R.; Parreira, V.R.; Jiang, Y.F.; Prescott, J.F. A Live Oral Recombinant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Vaccine Expressing Clostridium perfringens Antigens Confers Protection against Necrotic Enteritis in Broiler Chickens. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 2010, 17, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wilde, S.; Jiang, Y.; Tafoya, A.M.; Horsman, J.; Yousif, M.; Vazquez, L.A.; Roland, K.L. Salmonella-Vectored Vaccine Delivering Three Clostridium Perfringens Antigens Protects Poultry against Necrotic Enteritis. PLoS One 2019, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Moustafa, D.A.; Scarff, J.M.; Garcia, P.P.; Cassidy, S.K.B.; Di Giandomenico, A.; Waag, D.M.; Inzana, T.J.; Goldberg, J.B. Recombinant Salmonella Expressing Burkholderia Mallei LPS o Antigen Provides Protection in a Murine Model of Melioidosis and Glanders. PLoS One 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Salete, M.C.N.; Malak, K.; Poirier, T.P.; Stocker, B.A.D.; Beachey, E.H. Expression and Immunogenicity of a Streptococcal M Protein Epitope Inserted in Salmonella Flagellin. Infect Immun 1991, 59, 2158–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Park, S.; Won, G.; Lee, J.H. An Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine Secreting Lawsonia intracellularis Immunogenic Antigens Confers Dual Protection against Porcine Proliferative Enteropathy and Salmonellosis in a Murine Model. J Vet Sci 2019, 20, e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, M.; Sun, C.; Gu, J.; Yan, X.; Wang, B.; Cui, Z.; Sun, X.; Tong, C.; Feng, X.; Lei, L.; et al. Salmonella Typhimurium Strain Expressing OprF-OprI Protects Mice against Fatal Infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol Immunol 2015, 59, 533–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Hur, J.; Byeon, H.; Lee, H.J. Immunologic Study and Optimization of Salmonella Delivery Strains Adhesin and Toxin Antigens for Protection against Progressive Rhinitis in a Murine m. The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 2014, 78, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Buckley, A.M.; Wang, J.; Hudson, D.L.; Grant, A.J.; Jones, M.A.; Maskell, D.J.; Stevens, M.P. Evaluation of Live-Attenuated Salmonella Vaccines Expressing Campylobacter Antigens for Control of C. Jejuni in Poultry. Vaccine 2010, 28, 1094–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Łaniewski, P.; Kuczkowski, M.; Chrzastek, K.; Woźniak, A.; Wyszyńska, A.; Wieliczko, A.; Jagusztyn-Krynicka, E.K. Evaluation of the Immunogenicity of Campylobacter jejuni CjaA Protein Delivered by Salmonella enterica Sv. Typhimurium Strain with Regulated Delayed Attenuation in Chickens. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 30, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Stabel, T.J.; Mayfield, J.E.; Tabatabai, L.B.; Wannemuehler1, M.J. Oral Immunization of Mice with Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Containing a Recombinant Plasmid Which Codes for Production of a 31-Kilodalton Protein of Brucella abortus. Infect Immun 1990, 58, 2048–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Stabel, T.J.; Mayfield, J.E.; Tabatabai, L.B.; Wannemuehler1, M.J. Swine Immunity to an Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Mutant Containing a Recombinant Plasmid Which Codes for Production of a 31-Kilodalton Protein of Brucella abortus. Infect Immun 1991, 59, 2941–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhao, Z.; Li, M.; Luo, D.; Xing, L.; Wu, S.; Duan, Y.; Yang, P.; Wang, X. Protection of Mice from Brucella Infection by Immunization with Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Expressing A L7/L12 and BLS Fusion Antigen of Brucella. Vaccine 2009, 27, 5214–5219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lalsiamthara, J.; Lee, J.H. Brucella Lipopolysaccharide Reinforced Salmonella Delivering Brucella Immunogens Protects Mice against Virulent Challenge. Vet Microbiol 2017, 205, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kim, W.K.; Moon, J.Y.; Cho, J.S.; Hur, J. Protective Efficacy by Various Doses of a New Brucellosis Vaccine Candidate Based on Salmonella Strains Expressing Brucella abortus BSCP31, Omp3b and Superoxide Dismutase against Brucellosis in Murine Model. Pathog Dis 2017, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kim, W.K.; Moon, J.Y.; Cho, J.S.; Park, B.Y.; Hur, J. Protective Efficacy of a Canine Brucellosis Vaccine Candidate Based on Live Attenuated Salmonella Expressing Recombinant Brucella BCSP31, Omp3b and SOD Proteins in Beagles. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 2018, 80, 1373–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kim, W.-K.; Moon, J.-Y.; Cho, J.-S.; Hur, J. Protective Efficacy of a Brucella Vaccine Using a Salmonella-Based System Expressing Brucella Omp3b, BCSP31, and SOD proteins against Brucellosis in Korean Black Goats. The Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 2019, 83, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Senevirathne, A.; Hewawaduge, C.; Lee, J.H. Live Vaccine Consisting of Attenuated Salmonella Secreting and Delivering Brucella Ribosomal Protein L7/L12 Induces Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses and Protects Mice against Virulent Brucella abortus 544 Challenge. Vet Res 2020, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Stabel, T.J.; Mayfield, J.E.; Morfitt, D.C.; Wannemuehler, M.J. Oral Immunization of Mice and Swine with an Attenuated Salmonella choleraesuis [Δcya-12 Δ(Crp-Cdt)19] Mutant Containing a Recombinant Plasmid. Infect Immun 1993, 61, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ji, Z.; Shang, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Live Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Vaccine Vector Displaying Regulated Delayed Attenuation and Regulated Delayed Antigen Synthesis to Confer Protection against Streptococcus suis in Mice. Vaccine 2015, 33, 4858–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, Y.A.; Chen, Y.; Du, Y. zhao; Guo, W.; Chu, D.; Fan, J.; Wang, X.; Bellefleur, M.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Live-Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serotype Choleraesuis Vaccine with Regulated Delayed Fur Mutation Confer Protection against Streptococcus Suis in Mice. BMC Vet Res 2020, 16, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, Y.A.; Sun, Y.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Salmonella enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Vector Delivering a Dual-Antigen Expression Cassette Provides Mouse Cross-Protection against Streptococcus suis Serotypes 2, 7, 9, and 1/2. Vet Res 2022, 53, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhou, G.; Tian, Y.; Tian, J.; Ma, Q.; Huang, S.; Li, Q.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Oral Immunization with Attenuated Salmonella choleraesuis Expressing the P42 and P97 Antigens Protects Mice against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Challenge. Microbiol Spectr 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, G.; Li, C.; Liao, S.; Guo, A.; Wu, B.; Chen, H. C500 Variants Conveying Complete Mucosal Immunity against Fatal Infections of Pigs with Salmonella enterica Serovar Choleraesuis C78-1 or F18+ Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liljebjelke, K.A.; Petkov, D.I.; Kapczynski, D.R. Mucosal Vaccination with a Codon-Optimized Hemagglutinin Gene Expressed by Attenuated Salmonella Elicits a Protective Immune Response in Chickens against Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza. Vaccine 2010, 28, 4430–4437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Jazayeri, S.D.; Ideris, A.; Zakaria, Z.; Omar, A.R. Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium SV4089 as a Potential Carrier of Oral DNA Vaccine in Chickens. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rahman, M.M.; Uyangaa, E.; Han, Y.W.; Kim, S.B.; Kim, J.H.; Choi, J.Y.; Eo, S.K. Oral Co-Administration of Live Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Expressing Chicken Interferon-α and Interleukin-18 Enhances the Alleviation of Clinical Signs Caused by Respiratory Infection with Avian Influenza Virus H9N2. Vet Microbiol 2012, 157, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Jazayeri, S.D.; Ideris, A.; Zakaria, Z.; Yeap, S.K.; Omar, A.R. Improved Immune Responses against Avian Influenza Virus Following Oral Vaccination of Chickens with HA DNA Vaccine Using Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium as Carrier. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2012, 35, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hyoung, K.J.; Hajam, I.A.; Lee, J.H. A Consensus-Hemagglutinin-Based Vaccine Delivered by an Attenuated Salmonella Mutant Protects Chickens against Heterologous H7N1 Influenza Virus. Oncotarget 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kim, J.H.; Hajam, I.A.; Lee, J.H. Oral Immunization with a Novel Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Encoding Influenza HA, M2e and NA Antigens Protects Chickens against H7N9 Infection. Vet Res 2018, 49, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hajam, I.A.; Kirthika, P.; Hewawaduge, C.; Jawalagatti, V.; Park, S.W.; Senevirathne, A.; Lee, J.H. Oral Immunization with an Attenuated Salmonella gallinarum Encoding the H9N2 Haemagglutinin and M2 Ectodomain Induces Protective Immune Responses against H9N2 Infection in Chickens. Avian Pathology 2020, 486–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, B.M.; Han, Y.W.; Kim, S.B.; Rahman, M.M.; Uyangaa, E.; Kim, J.H.; Roh, Y.S.; Kim, B.; Han, S.B.; Hong, J.T.; et al. Enhanced Protection against Infection with Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus in Piglets by Oral Co-Administration of Live Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Expressing Swine Interferon-α and Interleukin-18. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 2011, 34, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Eo, S.K.; Yoon, H.A.; Aleyas, A.G.; Park, S.O.; Han, Y.W.; Chae, J.S.; Lee, J.H.; Song, H.J.; Cho, J.G. Systemic and Mucosal Immunity Induced by Oral Somatic Transgene Vaccination against Glycoprotein B of Pseudorabies Virus Using Live Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2006, 47, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kim, S.J.; Bum Kim, S.; Woo Han, Y.; Uyangaa, E.; Hyoung Kim, J.; Young Choi, J.; Kim, K.; Kug Eo, S. Co-Administration of Live Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Expressing Swine Interleukin-18 and Interferon-α Provides Enhanced Th1-Biased Protective Immunity against Inactivated Vaccine of Pseudorabies Virus. Microbiol Immunol 2012, 56, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yu, X.; Jia, R.; Huang, J.; Zhu, D.; Liu, Q.; Gao, X.; Lin, M.; Yin, Z.; Wang, M.; Chen, S.; et al. Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Delivering DNA Vaccine Encoding Duck Enteritis Virus UL24 Induced Systemic and Mucosal Immune Responses and Conferred Good Protection against Challenge. Vet Res 2012, 43, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Liu, X.; Liu, Q.; Xiao, K.; Li, P.; Liu, Q.; Zhao, X.; Kong, Q. Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Delivery of a Novel DNA Vaccine Induces Immune Responses and Provides Protection against Duck Enteritis Virus. Vet Microbiol 2016, 186, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Bhilare, K.D.; Jawalagatti, V.; Alam, M.J.; Chen, B.; Kim, B.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.H. Immune Response Following Safer Administration of Recombinant Salmonella Typhimurium Harboring ASFV Antigens in Pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2023, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Jiao, H.; Pan, Z.; Yin, Y.; Geng, S.; Sun, L.; Jiao, X. Oral and Nasal DNA Vaccines Delivered by Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Induce a Protective Immune Response against Infectious Bronchitis in Chickens. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 2011, 18, 1041–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Li, L.; Fang, W.; Li, J.; Fang, L.; Huang, Y.; Yu, L. Oral DNA Vaccination with the Polyprotein Gene of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV) Delivered by Attenuated Salmonella Elicits Protective Immune Responses in Chickens. Vaccine 2006, 24, 5919–5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Pan, Y.; Jia, R.; Li, J.; Wang, M.; Chen, S.; Liu, M.; Zhu, D.; Zhao, X.; Wu, Y.; Yang, Q.; et al. Heterologous Prime-Boost: An Important Candidate Immunization Strategy against Tembusu Virus. Virol J 2020, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Yang, H.; Cao, S.; Huang, X.; Liu, J.; Tang, Y.; Wen, X. Intragastric Administration of Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Harbouring Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus (TGEV) DNA Vaccine Induced Specific Antibody Production. Vaccine 2009, 27, 5035–5040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Kim, S.J.; Han, Y.W.; Rahman, M.M.; Kim, S.B.; Uyangaa, E.; Lee, B.M.; Kim, J.H.; Roh, Y.S.; Kang, S.H.; Kim, K.; et al. Live Attenuated Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Expressing Swine Interferon-α Has Antiviral Activity and Alleviates Clinical Signs Induced by Infection with Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus in Piglets. Vaccine 2010, 28, 5031–5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liao, X.; Huang, X.; Cao, S.; Wen, X.; Wen, Y.; Wu, R.; Liu, W. Construction of a Bivalent DNA Vaccine Co-Expressing S Genes of Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus and Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Delivered by Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium. Virus Genes 2016, 52, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Zhang, D.; Huang, X.; Zhang, X.; Cao, S.; Wen, X.; Wen, Y.; Wu, R.; Liang, E. Construction of an Oral Vaccine for Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus Based on the TGEV N Gene Expressed in an Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Vector. J Virol Methods 2016, 227, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Qing, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wen, X.; cao, S.; Wen, Y.; Wu, R.; et al. Immunogenicity of Transmissible Gastroenteritis Virus (TGEV) M Gene Delivered by Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium in Mice. Virus Genes 2016, 52, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Xiong, D.; Song, L.; Zhai, X.; Geng, S.; Pan, Z.; Jiao, X. A Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Vaccine Candidate Based on the Fusion Protein of PRRSV Glycoprotein 5 and the Toll-like Receptor-5 Agonist Salmonella Typhimurium FljB. BMC Vet Res 2015, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhi, Y.; Ji, H.J.; Guo, H.; Lim, J.H.; Byun, E.B.; Kim, W.S.; Seo, H.S. Salmonella Vaccine Vector System for Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus and Evaluation of Its Efficacy with Virus-like Particles. Vaccines (Basel) 2021, 9, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Steger, K.K.; Valentine, P.J.; He€ron, F.; So, M.; Pauza, C.D. Recombinant, Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Stimulate Lymphoproliferative Responses to SIV Capsid Antigen in Rhesus Macaques. Vaccine 1999, 17, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Wu, X.; Yu, L.; Chen, H.; Guo, H.; Zhang, M.; Li, H.; Liu, X.; Sun, S.; et al. Oral Immunisation of Mice with a Recombinant Rabies Virus Vaccine Incorporating the Heat-Labile Enterotoxin B Subunit of Escherichia coli in an Attenuated Salmonella Strain. Res Vet Sci 2012, 93, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Ong, W.C.; Jin, H.; Jiang, C.; Yan, W.; Liu, M.; Chen, J.; Zuo, X.; Zheng, Z. Attenuated Salmonella Choleraesuis-Mediated RNAi Targeted to Conserved Regions against Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Guinea Pigs and Swine. Vet Res 2010, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Li, Y.A.; Sun, Y.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Wang, S.; Shi, H. Salmonella enterica Serovar Choleraesuis Vector Delivering a Dual-Antigen Expression Cassette Provides Mouse Cross-Protection against Streptococcus suis Serotypes 2, 7, 9, and 1/2. Vet Res 2022, 53, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ding, K.; Shang, K.; Yu, Z.H.; Yu, C.; Jia, Y.Y.; He, L.; Liao, C.S.; Li, J.; Zhang, C.J.; Li, Y.J.; et al. Recombinant-Attenuated Salmonella Pullorum Strain Expressing the Hemagglutinin-Neuraminidase Protein of Newcastle Disease Virus (NDV) Protects Chickens against NDV and Salmonella Pullorum Challenge. J Vet Sci 2018, 19, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Layton, S.L.; Kapczynski, D.R.; Higgins, S.; Higgins, J.; Wolfenden, A.D.; Liljebjelke, K.A.; Bottje, W.G.; Swayne, D.; Berghman, L.R.; Kwon, Y.M.; et al. Vaccination of Chickens with Recombinant Salmonella Expressing M2e and CD154 Epitopes Increases Protection and Decreases Viral Shedding after Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza Challenge. Poult Sci 2009, 88, 2244–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Tang, B.; Li, J.; Li, T.; Xie, Y.; Guan, W.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, S.; Liu, M.; Xu, D. Vaccines as a Strategy to Control Trichinellosis. Front Microbiol 2022, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hewitson, J.P.; Maizels, R.M. Vaccination against Helminth Parasite Infections. Expert Rev Vaccines 2014, 13, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Chabalgoity, J.A.; Harrison, J.A.; Esteves, A.; Demarco De Hormaeche, R.; Ehrlich, R.; Anjam Khan, C.M.; Hormaeche, C.E. Expression and Immunogenicity of an Echinococcus granulosus Fatty Acid-Binding Protein in Live Attenuated Salmonella Vaccine Strains. Infect Immun 1997, 65, 2402–2412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Yang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, J.; Chen, X.; Cui, S.; Zhu, X. Oral Vaccination with Ts87 DNA Vaccine Delivered by Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Elicits a Protective Immune Response against Trichinella spiralis Larval Challenge. Vaccine 2010, 28, 2735–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Liu, P.; Wang, Z.Q.; Liu, R.D.; Jiang, P.; Long, S.R.; Liu, L.N.; Zhang, X.Z.; Cheng, X.C.; Yu, C.; Ren, H.J.; et al. Oral Vaccination of Mice with Trichinella spiralis Nudix Hydrolase DNA Vaccine Delivered by Attenuated Salmonella Elicited Protective Immunity. Exp Parasitol 2015, 153, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Qi, X.; Han, Y.; Jiang, P.; Yue, X.; Ren, H.N.; Sun, G.G.; Long, S.R.; Yu, C.; Cheng, X.C.; Cui, J.; et al. Oral Vaccination with Trichinella spiralis DNase II DNA Vaccine Delivered by Attenuated Salmonella Induces a Protective Immunity in BALB/c Mice. Vet Res 2018, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Li, J.F.; Guo, K.X.; Qi, X.; Lei, J.J.; Han, Y.; Yan, S.W.; Jiang, P.; Yu, C.; Cheng, X.C.; Wang, Z.Q.; et al. Protective Immunity against Trichinella spiralis in Mice Elicited by Oral Vaccination with Attenuated Salmonella-Delivered TsSP1.2 DNA. Vet Res 2018, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Müller-Schollenberger, V.; Beyer, W.; Schnitzler, P.; Merckelbach, A.; Roth, S.; Kalinna, B.H.; Lucius, R. Immunisation with Salmonella Typhimurium-Delivered Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Protects Mice against Challenge Infection with Echinococcus multilocularis Eggs. Int J Parasitol 2001, 31, 1441–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Xu, D.; Mcsorley, S.J.; Chatfield, S.N.; Dougant, G.; Liew, F.Y. Protection against Leishmania major Infection in Genetically Susceptible BALB/c Mice by GP63 Delivered Orally in Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium (AroA-AroD-). Immunology 1995, 85, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  141. Cong, H.; Gu, Q.M.; Jiang, Y.; He, S.Y.; Zhou, H.Y.; Yang, T.T.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Q. Oral Immunization with a Live Recombinant Attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium Protects Mice against Toxoplasma gondii. Parasite Immunol 2005, 27, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Benitez, A.J.; McNair, N.; Mead, J.R. Oral Immunization with Attenuated Salmonella Enterica Serovar Typhimurium Encoding Cryptosporidium parvum Cp23 and Cp40 Antigens Induces a Specific Immune Response in Mice. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 2009, 16, 1272–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Chen, G.; Dai, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Tang, B.; Zhu, Y.; Hua, Z. Oral Delivery of the Sj23LHD-GST Antigen by Salmonella Typhimurium Type III Secretion System Protects against Schistosoma japonicum Infection in Mice. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Lattemann, C.T.; Yan, Z.-X.; Matzen, A.; Meyer, T.F.; Apfel, H. Immunogenicity of the Extracellular Copper/Zinc Superoxide Dismutase of the Filarial Parasite Acanthocheilonema viteae Delivered by a Two-Phase Vaccine Strain of Salmonella Typhimurium. Parasite Immunlogy 1999, 21, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Bacterial antigens expressed in Salmonella.
Table 1. Bacterial antigens expressed in Salmonella.
Antigen (Organism) Salmonella
Strain or plasmid
Attenuation Route/dose
(CFU)
Model Immunity Reference
SspH2, LipL32 (Leptospira spp.) S. Typhimurium SL3261 ΔaroA O/1 × 107 Rat HI, MI, CI [57]
S. Typhimurium SL3261 ΔaroA O/109 Mice HI, MI [65]
S. Typhimurium SL3261 ΔaroA O/1 × 109 Swine HI, MI, CI [66]
P97R1 (M. hyopneumoniae) S. Typhimurium CS332 ΔaroA O/2 × 108; 2ª dose 3 × 108 Mice HI, MI, CI [67]
S. Typhimurium CS332 ΔaroA O/2 × 108; 2ª dose 3 × 108 Mice HI, MI, CI [68]
K88ab (Escherichia coli)
S. Typhimurium G30/pFM205
galE O, IP/1 × 108 Mice HI [69]
S. Typhimurium Δlon ΔcpxR Δasd O/1 × 108 Mice HI, MI [70]
S. Typhimurium Δlon ΔcpxR Δasd O/2 × 1010 Pregnant sows and piglets HI, MI [71]
K88ab, K88ac, K99, FasA, F41 (E. coli)
S. ghost controlled expression of φX174 lysis gene E - O/primed and boosted 2 × 109, 2 × 1010, and 2 × 1011 Pregnant sows and piglets HI, MI [63]
S. Typhimurium JOL912 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd IM/1 × 108 Mice HI, CI, MI [72]
Stx2eB, FedF, FedA F18+ Shiga toxin (E. coli) S. Typhimurium JOL1311 and JOL912 Δasd, Δlon, ΔcpxR IM/9 × 107 Mice HI, CI, MI [73]
fliC F18+ Shiga toxin (E. coli) S. Typhimurium JOL1454,
JOL1460, JOL1464
Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd SC/3 × 107 Mice HI, CI, MI [27]
APEC papA, papG, iutA, and clpG (E. coli) S. Typhimurium JOL912 Δlon, ΔcpxR, ΔasdA16 O/1 x 107 Chicken HI, CI, MI [74]
APEC papA, papG, iutA, and clpG (E. coli) S. Typhimurium JOL912 Δlon, ΔcpxR, ΔasdA16 O/1 x 107 Chicken HI, CI, MI [75]
APEC O-antigen (E. coli) S. Typhimurium S100 Δasd, Δcrp, Δcya, ΔrfbP O/ × 109, IM/ 5.0 × 107 Chicken HI, MI [76]
APEC PapA, CTB and LTB (E. coli) S. Typhimurium χ8501 hisG, Δcrp-28, ΔasdA16 O/2 × 109 Mice HI, MI [77]
APEC (E. coli) S. Typhimurium χ8025 Δasd O/1 × 108 Chicken MI [78]
tHP (Clostridium perfringens) S. Typhimurium Δasd O/1 × 109 Chicken Intestinal colonization, BSG [79]
tHP (C. perfringens) S. Typhimurium χ9352 Δasd, lacI O/1.2 × 109 Chicken MI [80]
α-toxin, NetB toxin, Fba
(C. perfringens)
S. Typhimurium χ11802 Δasd, lacI O/1 x 108 or 1 × 109 Chicken CI, MI [81]
PLcC, GST-NetB (C. perfringens) Salmonella vaccine (PIESV) χ11802 and χ12341 asdA, murA O/~5 × 108 Chicken NE Intestinal Lesion Scoring [33]
O antigen (Burkholderia mallei) S. Typhimurium SL326 ΔaroA IN/1 × 107 Mice HI, MI [82]
M protein (Streptococcus pyogenes) S. Typhimurium LB5000 - SC/Rabbit: 108 heat-killer bacteria or purified flagella; IP/ Mice: 1 × 106 to 2 × 106 live vaccine Mice and Rabbit HI [83]
optA, optB, LfliC, Lhly (Lawsonia intracellularis) S. Typhimurium JOL912 Δasd O/1 × 107 Mice HI, MI [84]
Sip (Streptococcus agalactiae) S. Typhimurium SL7207 ΔaroA IG/107, 108 and 109 Fish HI [32]
F1, I2 (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) S. Typhimurium LH430 phoP/phoQ,Δasd O and SC/ 2.0 × 108 to 2.0 × 1010 Mice HI, CI, MI [85]
CP39, FimA, PtfA,ToxA (Pasteurella multocida) F1P2 (Bordetella bronchiseptica) S. Typhimurium JOL912 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd IN/1 × 105 Mice HI, MI [86]
CjaA (Campylobacter jejuni) S. Typhimurium LB5010 ΔaroA, fliM, spaS, ssaU O/1 × 108 Chicken HI, MI [87]
CjaA (C. jejuni) S. Typhimurium χ9718 Δasd O/1 × 108 Chicken MI [88]
BCSP31 (Brucella abortus) S. Typhimurium chi 4064 Δcya, Δcrp O/2 × 108 to 4x108 Mice HI, MI, Blatogenisis [89]
BCSP31 (B. abortus) S. Typhimurium chi 4064 Δcya, Δcrp O/1 × 1010 to 2 × 1010 Crossbred swine HI, MI, Blatogenisis [90]
L7/L12, BLS (B. abortus) S. Typhimurium X4072 Δasd O/1 × 109 Mice HI, CI, MI [91]
BCSP31, Omp3b, SOD (B. abortus) S. Typhimurium JOL912 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd IP/1.2 × 106; O/ 1.2 × 109 Mice HI, CI [29]
SOD, BLS, PrpA, Omp19 (B. abortus) S. Typhimurium JOL912 and JOL1800 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd O and IP/2 × 107 Mice CI, MI [92]
BCSP31, Omp3b, SOD (B. abortus) S. Typhimurium JOL911 and JOL912 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd IP/1.2 × 104, 1.2 × 105 and 1.2 × 106 Mice HI, CI [93]
BCSP31, Omp3b, and SOD (B. abortus) S. Typhimurium pMMP65 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd SC/3 × 109 Dog HI, CI [94]
PrpA (B. abortus)
S. Typhimurium JOL1818 and JOL1881 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd, ΔrfaL IP/1 × 107 Mice HI, CI [92]
SOD, BLS, PrpA, Omp19 (B. abortus) S. Typhimurium JOL1800 ∆lon, ∆cpxR, ∆asd SC/5 × 109 and 5 × 1010 Goat HI, CI [24]
BCSP31, Omp3b, and SOD (B. abortus) S. Typhimurium JOL912 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd SC/3 × 109 Goat HI, CI [95]
L7/L12 (B. abortus) S. Typhimurium JOL1800 ∆lon, ∆cpxR, ∆asd, ∆rfaL IM/107 Mice HI, MI [96]
BCSP31
(B. abortus)
S. Choleraesuis chi 3781 ∆cpxR, ∆cya O/Mice: 4 ×1010; Swine: 4 × 108 to 6 × 108 Mice and crossbred swine HI, MI, [97]
6-PGD (Streptococcus suis) S. Choleraesuis rSC0011 Δasd O/1 ± 0.3 × 109 Mice HI, MI [98]
Serotypes 2 and 7 (S. suis) S. Choleraesuis rSC0016 ΔsopB O/ Suis: 1 ± 0.3 × 109; Mice: 1 ± 0.3 × 109 Mice and Swine HI, MI [28]
SaoA (S. suis) S. Choleraesuis
rSC0012
Δfur O/1 ± 0.2 × 109 Mice HI, MI, CI [99]
Serotypes 1/2, 2, 3, 7, 9 (S. suis) S. Choleraesuis rSC0016 ΔsopB, Δasd, lacl O/1 ± 0.2 × 109 Mice HI, CI [100]
P42, P97 (M. hyopneumoniae) S. Choleraesuis rSC0016 Δasd O/109 Mice HI, MI, CI [101]
F18+ Shiga toxin (E. coli) S. Choleraesuis C520 crp, Δasd
O/2 × 10 9 Swine HI, MI, CI [102]
* IG, intragastric; IM, intramuscular; IN, intranasal; IP, intraperitoneal; O, oral; SC, subcutaneous; CFU, colony-forming unit; HI, humoral immunity; CI, cellular immunity; MI, mucosal immunity. .
Table 2. Viral antigens expressed in Salmonella.
Table 2. Viral antigens expressed in Salmonella.
Antigen (Organism) Salmonella
Strain or plasmid
Attenuation Route/dose
(CFU)
Model Immunity Reference
HA (AIV H5N1) S. Typhimurium BRD509 ΔaroA, ΔaroD
O/10 9 Chicken Hemagglutination inhibition [103]
chIFN-a, chIL-18 (AIV H9N2) S. Typhimurium χ8501 hisG, Δcrp-28, ΔasdA16 O/ 109 and 1011 Chicken CI, Hemagglutination inhibition, PCR [105]
HA, NA, NP
(AIV H5N1)
S. Typhimurium SV4089 Dam, ΔPhoP O/109 Chicken PCR; FISH, and culturing on XLT4 [104]
HA (AIV H5N1) S. Typhimurium SV4089 Dam, ΔPhoP O, IM/ 109 Chicken CI, Hemagglutination inhibition, PCR [106]
HA (AIV H9N2) S. Typhimurium JOL912, JOL1800 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd O/ 108 Chicken HI, Hemagglutination inhibition [30]
HA (AIV H7N1) S. Typhimurium JOL1863 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd O, IN, IM/ 109 Chicken HI, MI, Hemagglutination inhibition [107]
HA, M2, NA (LPAI H7N9) S. Typhimurium JOL1800 O antigen deficient O/109 Chicken HI, CI, MI [108]
H9N2 haemagglutinin, M2 (AIV H9N2) S. Gallinarum JOL967 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd O, IM/ 109 Chicken HI, CI, MI [109]
swIFN-α, swIL-18 (TGEV) S. Typhimurium 8501 hisG, Δcrp-28, ΔasdA16
O/ 1011 Swine Gross lesion; histopathological; qRT-PCR [110]
Glycoprotein B (PrV) S. Typhimurium SL7207 ΔaroA O/5 to 10 107 Mice HI, MI [111]
swIL-18, swIFN-α (PrV) S. Typhimurium χ8501 hisG, Δcrp-28, ΔasdA16 O/1011 Swine HI, CI [112]
UL24 (DEV) S. Typhimurium SL7207 hisG46, DEL407, ΔaroA O/1011, 1010 or 109 Duck HI, CI, MI [113]
tgB, UL24 (DEV) S. Typhimurium S739 Δasd-66, Δcrp-24, Δcya-25 O/1010; 1011 or 1012 Duck MI [114]
CD2v/CTL/9GL, p54/p12/p72(ASFV) S. Typhimurium JOL912 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd IM/ 108 Swine HI, CI, MI [115]
S1, N (IBV) S. Typhimurium SL7207 ΔaroA O, IN/ 1 × 109, 5 × 109 or 1 × 1010 Chicken HI, MI [116]
VP2/4/3 (IBVD) S. Typhimurium Dam, Phop O/ 109, 108 or 107 Chicken HI [117]
prM-E (TMUV) S. Typhimurium SL7207 + adenovirus adjuvant with duck IL-2 ΔaroA O, IM/ 107, 1010 Duck HI, CI [118]
N (TGEV) S. Typhimurium SL7207 ΔaroA IG/107, 108 or 109 Mice HI, MI [119]
swIFN-α (TGEV) S. Typhimurium χ8501 hisG, Δcrp-28, ΔasdA16 O/ 109 or 1011 Swine qRT-PCR [120]
S (TGEV, PEDV) S. Typhimurium SL7207 ΔaroA O/ 1.6 × 1011 Swine HI, CI, MI [121]
N (TGEV) S. Typhimurium SL7207 ΔaroA O/1012 Swine HI, CI, MI [122]
M (TGEV) S. Typhimurium m SL7207 ΔaroA IG/109 Mice HI, CI, MI [123]
Glycoprotein 5, TLR-5 (PRRSV) S. Typhimurium SL7207, FljB IP/ 50 μg Mice HI [124]
VP1 (FMDV) S. Typhimurium KST0666 Irradiated IP/ 1 × 104 to 3 × 108 Mice HI, CI, MI, VN [125]
p27 capsid (SIV) S. Typhimurium PV4570 ΔaroA IM, IG/ 1010 Rhesus macaques HI, CI, MI [126]
Glycoprotein (RV), LTB (E. coli) S. Typhimurium LH430 phoP, phoQ O/5 × 1010
Mice HI, CI [127]
siRNA expressing 3D, VP4 and 2B (FMDV) S. Choleraesuis
C500
IM/ Guinea pigs: 1.0 × 109; Swines: 5 × 109 Guinea Pigs, Swine SPB-ELISA [128]
Cap (PCV2) S. Choleraesuis
rSC0016
ΔsopB, ΔasdA O/109 Mice HI, CI, MI, qPCR, VN [129]
HN (NDV) S. Pullorum C79-13 Δcrp, Δasd O/109 Chicken HI, MI, Hemagglutination inhibition [130])
S1 (IBV) S. Gallinarum JOL2068, JOL2077 Δlon, ΔcpxR, Δasd O/109 Chicken HI, MI [23]
M2e, CD154 (AIV H5N1) Salmonella enteritidis ΔaroA, ΔhtrA O/ 106 to 108 Chicken MI, Hemagglutination inhibition [131]
* IG, intragastric; IM, intramuscular; IN, intranasal; IP, intraperitoneal; O, oral; CFU, colony-forming unit; HI, humoral immunity; CI, cellular immunity; MI, mucosal immunity; VN, virus neutralization assays; AIV, avian influenza viruses; ASFV, african swine fever virus; DEV, duck enteritis virus; FMDV, foot-and-mouth disease virus; IBV, infectious bronchitis virus; IBVD, infectious bursal disease virus; LTB, heat-labile enterotoxin B; NDV, newcastle disease virus; PRRSV, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome; PrV, pseudorabies virus; p3D-NT56, siRNA directed against the polymerase gene 3D of FMDV; SIV, simian immunodeficiency virus, TGEV, porcine transmissible gastroenteritis virus; TLR-5, Toll-like receptor 5 TMUV, tembusu virus; VLP, virus-like particles.
Table 3. Parasitic antigens expressed in Salmonella.
Table 3. Parasitic antigens expressed in Salmonella.
Antigen (Organism) Salmonella
Strain or plasmid
Attenuation Route/dose
(CFU)
Model Immunity Reference
Ts87 (Trichinella spiralis) S. Typhimurium SL7207 ΔaroA O/108 Mice HI, CI, MI [135]
Ag30 (T. spiralis) S. Typhimurium SL3261 ΔaroA IN/109 Mice HI, CI, MI [31]
TsNd (T. spiralis) S. Typhimurium SL1344 Δcya O/108 Mice HI, CI, MI [136]
DNase II (T. spiralis) S. Typhimurium SL1344 Δcya O/108 Mice HI, CI, MI [137]
rTsSP1.2 (T. spiralis) S. Typhimurium SL1344 Δcya O/108 Mice HI, CI, MI [138]
FABP (Echinococcus granulosus) S. Typhimurium SL3261 ΔaroA IV/106, O/4 × 109 Mice HI, CI, MI [134]
FABP (E. granulosus) S. Typhimurium LVR01 ΔaroC O/ 5 × 1010 Dog HI, CI, MI [48]
EmGAPDH (Echinococcus multilocularis) S. Typhimurium O/2 × 1010 or IP: 5 × 105 Mice Western blotting [139]
gp63 (Leishmania major) S. Typhimurium BRD509 ΔaroA, ΔaroD O/ 1 × 1010 Mice HI, CI [140]
SAG, SAG2 (Toxoplasma gondii) S. Typhimurium BRD509 ΔaroA, ΔaroD IG/109 Mice HI, CI [141]
Tachyzoite and bradyzoite proteins (T. gondii) S. Typhimurium BRD509 ΔaroA, ΔaroD O, IN, IM/1 to 5 × 109 Mice HI, CI, MI [22]
Cp23, Cp40
(Cryptosporidium parvum)
S. Typhimurium SL3261 and LB5010 ΔaroA, galE IG/5 × 109 Mice HI, MI [142]
Sj23LHD-GST (Schistosoma japonicum) S. Typhimurium VNP20009 purI, msbB O/109 Mice HI, CI [143]
EC-SOD (Acanthocheilonema viteae) S. Typhimurium SL3261 ΔaroA O/5 × 108 Jird HI [144]
* IG, intragastric; IM, intramuscular; IN, intranasal; IP, intraperitoneal; IV, intravenous; O, oral; CFU, colony-forming unit; HI, humoral immunity; CI, cellular immunity; MI, mucosal; EmGAPDH, immunityglyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated