Submitted:
14 October 2024
Posted:
15 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methodological Procedures
Description of the Interviews
3. Results
3.1. Socioeconomic Characteristics of the Municipality of Ingaí – MG, Brazil
3.2. Producers' Level of Technification
3.3. Local Connectivity Infrastructure
3.4. Existing Support Networks
3.5. Property Management
3.6. Market Management
4. Discussion
5. Final Considerations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bianchi, P.N.L.; Bodnar, Z.; Gonçalves Junior, L.C. O direito à cidade: entre a segregação socioespacial e a busca por cidades sustentáveis / City law: in between socio-spatial segregation and the search for sustainable cities. Rev. de Dir. da Cidade, 2021, 13, 1269–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável no Brasil. Available online: https://brasil.un.org/pt-br/sdgs (accessed on 13 August 2024).
- Sinclair, M.A.; Henshaw, M.J.D.; Henshaw, S.L. On building sustainable communities: A perspective for HFE practitioners. Applied Ergonomics 2021, 96, 103476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reames, T.G.; Wright, N.S. The Three E’s Revisited: How Do Community-Based Organizations Define Sustainable Communities and Their Role in Pursuit of? Sustainability 2021, 13, 8825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazzeroni, M. High-Tech Activities, System Innovativeness and Geographical Concentration. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2010, 17, 45–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bánkuti, F.I.; Damasceno, J.C.; Schiavi, S.M.; Kuwaraha, K.C.; Prizon, R.C. Structural features, labour conditions and family succession in dairy production systems in Paraná State, Brazil. Cahiers Agricultures 2018, 27, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, R.; Braun, J.; Frank, M. How does the Adoption of Digital Technologies Affect the Social Sustainability of Small-scale Agriculture in South-West Germany? International Journal Food System Dynamics 2022, 13, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, J.; Zhao, B.; Song, Y.; Lin, X. Research on the Spatial Dynamic Evolution of Digital Agriculture—Evidence from China. Sustainability 2024, 16, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gumbi, N.; Gumbi, L.; Twinomurinzi, H. Towards Sustainable Digital Agriculture for Smallholder Farmers: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quais são os DATs? Available online: https://www.semear-digital.cnptia.embrapa.br/dats/ (accessed on 29 August 2024).
- Silva, K.A.; Costa, C.B.; Rodrigues, J.S.; Miranda, M.R.; Pfeifer, L.F.M. Mapeamento das tecnologias utilizadas para pecuária 4.0 com foco em gado leiteiro. Observatório de la Economía Latinoamericana 2024, 22, 1846–1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Censo 2022: População e Domicílios – primeiros resultados. Available online: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/mg/ingai/pesquisa/24/76693 (accessed on 31 July 2024).
- Liu, N.; Qi, J.; An, X.; Wang, Y. A Review on Information Technologies Applicable to Precision Dairy Farming: Focus on Behavior, Health Monitoring, and the Precise Feeding of Dairy Cows. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prosperi, M.; Sisto, R.; Lopolito, A.; Materia, V.C. Local Entrepreneurs’ Involvement in Strategy Building to Facilitate Agro-Food Waste Valorisation within an Agro-Food Technological District: A SWOT-SOR Approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fontana, A.; Frey, J.H. (1994). Interviewing: The Art of Science. The Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. a. Y. L. Denzin. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. pp.361-76. Available online: https://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~pms/cj355/readings/fontana&frey.pdf.
- Vergara, S.C. Métodos de pesquisa em administração, 6th ed.; Atlas: São Paulo, Brazil, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento. Available online: https://www.undp.org/pt/brazil/pnud-no-brasil (accessed on 18 September 2024).
- Minas Gerais Meso Micro Municipio. Rafael Lorenzetto de Abreu. Available online: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MinasGerais_MesoMicroMunicip.svg (accessed on 09 September 2024).
- Censo Agropecuário 2017 - Resultados definitivos. IBGE Cidades. Available online: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/mg/ingai/pesquisa/24/76693 (accessed on 31 July 2024).
- Bánkuti, S.M.S.; Bánkuti, F.I.; Souza Filho, H.M. Sistema Agroindustrial do Leite: um estudo das estruturas de governança a partir de experiências no Brasil e na França. Informações Econômicas 2010, 40, 45–56. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278242407_SISTEMA_AGROINDUSTRIAL_DO_LEITE_um_estudo_das_estruturas_de_governanca_a_partir_de_experiencias_no_Brasil_e_na_Franca.
- Martins, M.R.; Santoyo, A.H.; Salgado, E.G.; Rezende, M.L. Production Systems and Environmental and Socioeconomic Sustainability: Comparison Between Dairy Farms in Minas Gerais. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 2023, 17, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, C.C.; Almeida, G.A.; Lopes, M.A. Dairy activity in family farming in Minas Gerais, Brazil: production costs and cost-effectiveness analysis. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 2018, 39, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novo, A.; Jansen, K.; Slingerland, M. The novelty of simple and known technologies and the rhythm of farmer-centred innovation in family dairy farming in Brazil. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 2014, 13, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonamigo, A.; Ferenhof, H.A.; Forcellini, F.A. Dairy production diagnosis in Santa Catarina, Brazil, from the perspective of business ecosystem. British Food Journal 2016, 118, 2086–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bassotto, L.C.; Lima, A.L.R.; Carvalho, F.M.; Lopes, M.A.; Nascimento, E.F.R.; Netto, E.P.L. Characteristics of dairy farms with different levels of technical efficiency. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2023, 47, e019122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mellet, K.; Beauvisage, T. Cookie monsters. Anatomy of a digital market infrastructure. Consumption Markets & Culture 2020, 23, 110–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomes, A.B.; Souto, L.S.; Souto, J.S.; Silva, R.A.; Maracajá, P.B.; Medeiros, A.C.; Andrade, T.A.M.; Andrade, J.G.C.; Almeida, R.R.; Nepomucena, T.A.P.G. Telefonia móvel rural para o nupeárido (CSTR/UFCG), Campus de Patos, PB – Brasil. Revista Científica Integr@ção 2024, 5, 257–298. Available online: https://integracao.unifip.edu.br/index.php/integracao/article/view/53.
- Gomes, A.P.; Ervilha, G.T.; Freitas, L.F.; Nascif, C. Assistência técnica, eficiência e rentabilidade na produção de leite. Revista de Política Agrícola 2018, 27. [Google Scholar]
- Alvarenga, L. Metodologia do Sebrae acelera o desenvolvimento de Ecossistemas Locais de Inovação em Itajubá e Lavras, no Sul de Minas. Revista Histórias de Sucesso. 2024, 3. Sebrae. Available online: https://revistahistoriasdesucesso.sebraemg.com.br/edicao10/ecossistema.php (accessed on 10 September 2024).
- Associados Silemg. Available online: https://www.silemg.com.br/associados-silemg (accessed on 29 June 2024).
- Rocha, E.C.F.; Silva, R.O.; Silveira, R.I.M. A Tecnologia Blockchain como ferramenta para a Rastreabilidade em Cadeias de Suprimentos do Leite. Revista H-Tec Humanidades e Tecnologia 2024, 8, 7–31. Available online: https://fateccruzeiro.edu.br/revista/index.php/htec/article/view/379.





| Group of interviewees | Number of participants |
|---|---|
| Technicians and extension workers (Emater, City Hall, Sebrae and Company X) |
4 |
| Representatives of the local government | 6 |
| Producers belonging to the association of producers of Ingaí and credit cooperative operating in the municipality | 8 |
| Representatives of the local agribusiness | 2 |
| Local Internet Service Providers | 4 |
| Commercial representatives of agricultural input companies | 6 |
| Product | Establishments | Harvested area (hectares) | Quantity produced |
Production value (x1.000R$) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milk | 145 | Not applicable | 20.647 thousand litres | R$23.710.067 |
| Corn (grain) | 97 | 2.270 | 14.944 tons | R$7.725,478 |
| Corn (forage) | 121 | 1.571 | 60.163 tons | R$5.733,973 |
| Coffee | 30 | 416 | 524 tons | R$4.021,469 |
| Soy | 11 | 939 | 3.387 tons | R$3.735,378 |
| Beans (color) | 18 | 639 | 937 tons | R$2.078,305 2 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).