Submitted:
12 October 2024
Posted:
15 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials and Biochar Preparation
2.2. BC Characterization

2.3. Batch Adsorption Tests
2.4. Determination of CVOCs
2.5. Modeling of Adsorption Process
2.6. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. BC Characterization
3.2. Kinetic Analysis of PCE and TCE Adsorption
3.3. Isotherm Modeling and Analysis
3.4. Comparative Analysis of BC and AC for CVOC Adsorption: ANOVA Approach
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Jatoi, A. S.; Ahmed, J.; Bhutto, A. A.; Jeyapaul, A. S. Recent advances and future perspectives of carbon-based nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, P.; Yadav, R. A review on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as environmental pollutants: Fate and distribution. Int. J. Plant Environ. 2018, 4, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Q.; Kong, F.; Liu, B. F.; Song, X.; Ren, H. Y. Biochar-based composites for removing chlorinated organic pollutants: Applications, mechanisms, and perspectives. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2024, 100420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B.H. Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brusseau, M. L.; Carroll, K. C.; Truex, M. J.; Becker, D. J. Characterization and remediation of chlorinated volatile organic contaminants in the vadose zone. Vadose Zone J. 2013, 12, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, B.; Shao, Q.; Shi, J.; Yang, C.; Chu, H. Application of biochar for the adsorption of organic pollutants from wastewater: Modification strategies, mechanisms and challenges. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 300, 121925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seow, Y. X.; Tan, Y. H.; Mubarak, N. M.; Kansedo, J.; Khalid, M.; Ibrahim, M. L.; Ghasemi, M. A review on biochar production from different biomass wastes by recent carbonization technologies and its sustainable applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Remmani, R.; Yilmaz, M.; Benaoune, S.; Di Palma, L. Optimized pyrolytic synthesis and physicochemical characterization of date palm seed biochar: Unveiling a sustainable adsorbent for environmental remediation applications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Díaz, B.; Sommer-Márquez, A.; Ordoñez, P. E.; Bastardo-González, E.; Ricaurte, M.; Navas-Cárdenas, C. Synthesis methods, properties, and modifications of biochar-based materials for wastewater treatment: A review. Resources 2024, 13, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of gases with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Masud, M. A.; Shin, W. S.; Sarker, A.; Septian, A.; Das, K.; Deepo, D. M.; Malafaia, G. A critical review of sustainable application of biochar for green remediation: Research uncertainty and future directions. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 166813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Remmani, R.; Makhloufi, R.; Miladi, M.; Ouakouak, A.; Canales, A.R.; Núñez-Gómez, D. Development of low-cost activated carbon towards an eco-efficient removal of organic pollutants from oily wastewater. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2021, 30, 1801–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mesnoua, M.; Remmani, R.; Benchik, C. Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars from date palm residues with the aim of soil amendment. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 247, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, Y.; Qin, S.; Verma, S.; Sar, T.; Sarsaiya, S.; Ravindran, B.; Awasthi, M. K. Production and beneficial impact of biochar for environmental application: a comprehensive review. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 337, 125451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Remmani, R. Optimization and Application of Date Palm Seed Derived Biochar for Augmented Adsorption of Volatile Organic Compounds: A Specialized Inquiry into Trichloroethylene (TCE) and Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) Remediation. Doctoral Dissertation, Université Mohamed Khider (Biskra-Algérie) 2024. [CrossRef]
- Nunes, C.A.; Guerreiro, M.C. Estimation of surface area and pore volume of activated carbons by methylene blue and iodine numbers. Quim. Nova 2011, 34, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amalina, F.; Krishnan, S.; Zularisam, A. W.; Nasrullah, M. Recent advancement and applications of biochar technology as a multifunctional component towards sustainable environment. Environ. Dev. 2023, 46, 100819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, Y.S.; McKay, G. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem. 1999, 34, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roumani, M.; Remmani, R.; Miladi, M.; Abu-Khalaf, N.; Canales, A. R. Physical properties and mass models of Deglet Noor and Arichti semi-dry Algerian date fruits: A comparative study. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 12, 2886–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rossi, M. M.; Silvani, L.; Amanat, N.; Petrangeli Papini, M. Biochar from pine wood, rice husks and iron-eupatorium shrubs for remediation applications: Surface characterization and experimental tests for trichloroethylene removal. Materials 2021, 14, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Definition and Procedure for the Determination of the Method Detection Limit, Revision 2. (EPA 821-R-16-006). U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency 2016.





| Adsorbent Type | Contaminant Type | Q (mg/g) |
| AC | TCE | 47.0061 |
| BC | TCE | 84.902 |
| BC | PCE | 83.2903 |
| BC | PCE | 83.4582 |
| BC | TCE | 84.953 |
| AC | PCE | 44.9667 |
| BC | PCE | 83.3743 |
| AC | TCE | 46.9642 |
| AC | PCE | 44.8889 |
| AC | PCE | 45.0128 |
| BC | TCE | 84.9296 |
| AC | TCE | 46.9293 |
| Parameter | Value |
| BET (m²/g) | 654.7851 |
| Pore Volume (cm³/g) | 0.0947 |
| Mesopore Volume (cm³/g) | 0.19012 |
| Pore Diameter (nm) | 0.9530 |
| Qm (cm³/g) | 150.4362 |
| PCE Removal | |||
| Fitted Model | Adsorbent | BC | AC |
| PFO | q (mg/g) | 63.9401 | 44.7409 |
| K (min-1) | 12.3923 | 6.8517 | |
| R² | 0.7929 | 0.9998 | |
| PSO | q (mg/g) | 85.9675 | 44.7409 |
| K (min-1) | 0.0002 | 26826.0932 | |
| R² | 0.9594 | 0.9998 | |
| TCE Removal | |||
| Fitted Model | Adsorbent | BC | AC |
| PFO | q (mg/g) | 67.1037 | 44.9505 |
| K (min-1) | 12.2270 | 7.1318 | |
| R² | 0.8130 | 0.9843 | |
| PSO | q (mg/g) | 86.6836 | 47.5400 |
| K (min-1) | 0.0003 | 0.0031 | |
| R² | 0.9810 | 0.9998 | |
| PCE Removal | |||
| Adsorbent | BC | AC | |
| Langmuir | Qmax (mg/g) | 283.2054 | 593.1827 |
| K (L/mg) | 0.1496 | 0.0046 | |
| R² | 0.9862 | 0.9957 | |
| Freundlich | K (L/mg) | 43.5601 | 3.1559 |
| n | 0.6167 | 0.9187 | |
| R² | 0.9940 | 0.9954 | |
| TCE Removal | |||
| Adsorbent | BC | AC | |
| Langmuir | Qmax (mg/g) | 586.1234 | 713.4764 |
| K (L/mg) | 0.0777 | 0.00856 | |
| R² | 0.9984 | 0.9991 | |
| Freundlich | K (L/mg) | 72.3580 | 7.8316 |
| n | 0.4866 | 0.8534 | |
| R² | 0.9826 | 0.9990 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).