Submitted:
09 October 2024
Posted:
12 October 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
2.1. In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Properties
2.2. Tissue Distribution and Excretion
2.3. In Vivo and In Vivo Metabolic Profiles
2.4. In Vivo Drug-Drug Interaction Assay
2.5. Interspecies Simple Allometric Scaling of CL and Vdss
3. Discussion
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Drugs, Chemicals and Reagents
4.2. Animals
4.3. Analytical Method and Method Validation
4.4. Intravenous and Intragastric PK Studies of SPH5030
4.5. Tissue Distribution and Excretion Test in SD Rats
4.6. In Vivo and In Vitro Metabolite Identification
4.7. In Vitro Metabolic Profiles Analysis
4.8. Transporter Mediated Interaction
4.9. Simple Allometric Scaling of Preclinical In Vivo Clearance and Volume of Distribution for Human Pharmacokinetics Prediction
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cronin K.A.; Harlan L.C.; Dodd K.W.; Abrams J.S.; Ballard B.R. Population-based estimate of the prevalence of HER-2 positive breast cancer tumors for early stage patients in the US. Cancer Invest. 2010, 28, 963-968. [CrossRef]
- Li X.; Yang C.; Wan H.; Zhang G.; Feng J.; Zhang L.; Chen X.; Zhong D.; Lou L.; Tao W.; Zhang L. Discovery and development of pyrotinib: A novel irreversible EGFR/HER2 dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor with favorable safety profiles for the treatment of breast cancer. European journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2017, 110, 51–61. [CrossRef]
- Franklin, M.C.; Carey K.D.; Vajdos F.F.; Leahy D.J.; de Vos A.M.; Sliwkowski M.X. Insights into ErbB signaling from the structure of the ErbB2-pertuzumab complex. Cancer Cell. 2004, 5, 317-328. [CrossRef]
- Blume J.P.; Hunter T. Oncogenetic Kinase Signaling. Nature. 2001, 411, 355-365. [CrossRef]
- Olayioye M.A. Update on HER-2 as a target for cancer therapy: intracellular signaling pathways of ErbB2/HER-2 and family members. Breast Cancer Res. 2001, 3, 385–389. [CrossRef]
- Iida M.; Brand T.M.; Starr M.M.; Huppert E.J.; Luthar N.; Bahrar H.; Coan J.P.; Pearson H.E.; Salgia R.; Wheeler D.L. Overcoming acquired resistance to cetuximab by dual targeting HER family receptors with antibody-based therapy. Mol Cancer. 2014, 13, 1-16. [CrossRef]
- Kondrashov A.; Sapkota S.; Sharma A.; Riano I.; Kurzrock R.; Adashek J.J. Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Solid Tumor Oncology: An Effectiveness Payday with a Targeted Payload. Pharmaceutics. 2023, 15, 2160-2187. [CrossRef]
- Nakada T.; Sugihara K.; Jikoh T.; Abe Y.; Agatsuma T. The Latest Research and Development into the Antibody-Drug Conjugate, [fam-] Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (DS-8201a), for HER2 Cancer Therapy. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2019, 67, 173-185. [CrossRef]
- Li D.; Tu Y.; Jin K.; Duan L.; Hong Y.; Xu J.; Chen N.; Zhang Z.; Zuo H.; Gong W.; Zhang J.; Wang Q.; Qian H.; Wang X.; Ke Y.; Xia G. Discovery of SPH5030, a Selective, Potent, and Irreversible Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for HER2-Amplified and HER2-Mutant Cancer Treatment. J Med Chem. 2022, 65, 5334–5354. [CrossRef]
- Mckertish C.M.; Kayser V. A Novel Dual-Payload ADC for the Treatment of HER2+ Breast and Colon Cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2023, 15, 2020-2017. [CrossRef]
- Nguyen K.S.; Kobayashi S.; Costa D.B. Acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancers dependent on the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway. Clinical Lung Cancer. 2009, 10, 281-289. [CrossRef]
- Yun C.H.; Mengwasser K.E.; Toms A.V.; Woo M.S.; Greulich H.; Wong K.K.; Meyerson M.; Eck M.J. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105, 2070-2075. [CrossRef]
- Kulukian A.; Lee P.; Taylor J.; Rosler R.; de Vries P.; Watson D.; Forero T.A.; Peterson S. Pre-clinical activity of HER2-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor tucatinib as a single agentor in combination with trastuzumab or docetaxel in solid tumor models. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2020, 19, 976–987. [CrossRef]
- Vu T.; Claret F.X. Trastuzumab: updated mechanisms of action and resistance in breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2012, 2, 1-6. [CrossRef]
- Wrighton S.A.; Stevens J.C. The human hepatic cytochromes P450 involved in drug metabolism. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1992, 22, 1-21. [CrossRef]
- Mattinen L.; Kublbeck J.; Rechardt O.; Honkakoski P.; Rautio J. Direct and rapid transcript analysis assay for CYP mRNA expression and inducibility in human primary hepatocytes. Drug Metab Lett. 2014, 8, 77-87. [CrossRef]
- Boxenbaum H. Interspecies scaling, allometry, physiological time, and the ground plan of pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1982, 10:201-227. [CrossRef]
- Davies B.; Morris T. Physiological parameters in laboratory animals and humans. Pharm Res. 1993, 10, 1093-1095. [CrossRef]
- Grillo M.P.; Markova S.; Evanchik M.; Trellu M.; Moliner P.; Brun P.; Perreard-Dumaine A.; Vicat P.; Driscoll JP.; Carlson TJ. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic properties of danicamtiv, a new targeted myosin activator for the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy. Xenobiotica. 2021, 51, 222-238. [CrossRef]
- J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 3117). https://conferences.asco.org/am/embargo-abstract-release.
- Czyrski A.; Resztak M.; Świderski P.; Brylak J.; Główka F.K. The Overview on the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions of Triazoles. Pharmaceutics. 2021, 13, 1961-1987. [CrossRef]
- Smith DA.; Beaumont K.; Maurer TS.; Di L. Relevance of half-life in drug design. J Med Chem. 2018, 24, 61, 4273-4282. [CrossRef]
- Westra N, Touw D, Lub-de Hooge M, Kosterink J, Oude Munnink T. Pharmacokinetic Boosting of Kinase Inhibitors. 2023, 15, 1149-1174. [CrossRef]





| Species |
Dose mg/kg |
Route |
Tmax (h) |
Cmax (µg/mL) |
AUCtot (µg·h/mL) |
MRT0-∞ (h) |
T1/2 (h) |
CL (mL/min/kg) |
Vss (L/kg) |
F (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rat | 4 | iv | - | - | 13.5 | 5.18 | 4.13 | 5.83 | 1.66 | |
| 4 | ig | 4 | 0.642 | 7.62 | 7.77 | 4.64 | - | - | 56.4 | |
| 8 | ig | 5 | 1.3 | 15.4 | 8.4 | 8.27 | - | - | 57 | |
| 16 | ig | 4 | 2.49 | 34.7 | 8.9 | 6.75 | - | - | 64.3 | |
| Monkey | 4 | iv | - | - | 10.0 | 6.45 | 5.92 | 6.95 | 2.67 | - |
| 4 | ig | 2 | 0.304 | 2.39 | 7.6 | 5.19 | - | - | 23.9 | |
| 8 | ig | 4 | 0.363 | 3.62 | 7.44 | 4.95 | - | - | 18.1 | |
| 16 | ig | 4.5 | 0.713 | 15.2 | 15.9 | 9.14 | - | - | 38 |
| Species | T1/2 (min) |
CLint# (mL/min/kg) |
CLhb* (mL/min/kg) |
BRPP**(%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPH5030 | SPH6849 | |||||
| Human | 73.7 | 23.6 | 11.0 | 99.2 | 98.8 | |
| Monkey | 46.5 | 43.6 | 21.9 | 99.4 | 99.1 | |
| Dog | 56.4 | 61.3 | 20.5 | 99.0 | 98.0 | |
| Rat | 54.2 | 45.9 | 25.1 | 99.9 | 99.9 | |
| Mouse | 86.6 | 63.0 | 37.1 | 99.8 | 99.8 | |
| Dose (mg) | Cmax (µM) | CYP 1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 (>50 µM) | CYP3A4 (Midazolam 6β-Hydroxylation) (17.1 µM) | CYP3A4 (Testosterone 6 β- Hydroxylation) (20.7 µM) | CYP2C8 (16 µM) | hERG (>100 µM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 0.110 | > 454.0 × | > 155.0 × | > 18.0 × | > 145.0 × | > 909.0 × |
| 50 | 0.413 | > 121.0 × | > 41.0 × | > 50.0 × | > 38.0 × | > 242.0 × |
| 100 | 0.620 | > 80.0 × | > 27.0 × | > 33.0 × | > 25.0 × | > 161.0 × |
| 200 | 1.474 | > 33.0 × | > 11.0 × | > 14.0 × | > 10.0 × | > 67.0 × |
| 400 | 2.914 | > 17.0 × | > 5.0 × | > 7.0 × | > 5.0 × | > 34.0 × |
| 800 | 6.848 | > 7.0 × | > 2.0 × | > 3.0 × | > 2.0 × | > 14.0 × |
| Hepatocyte Batch |
SPH5030 (µM) |
CYP Enzyme Activity | mRNA Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Induction Multiple | % of PC | Induction Multiple | % of PC | |||||||||||
| 1A2 | 2B6 | 3A4 | 1A2 | 2B6 | 3A4 | 1A2 | 2B6 | 3A4 | 1A2 | 2B6 | 3A4 | |||
| 0.10 | 0.91 | 0.68 | 1.50 | -0.56 | -4.46 | 7.24 | 0.54 | 1.00 | 1.56 | -0.42 | -0.01 | 3.19 | ||
| QBU | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.60 | 1.67 | -1.69 | -5.49 | 9.81 | 0.51 | 1.43 | 3.80 | -0.44 | 1.21 | 16.1 | |
| 10.0 | 0.44 | 0.41 | 1.50 | -3.30 | -8.07 | 7.30 | 0.84 | 1.90 | 11.1 | -0.15 | 2.50 | 57.7 | ||
| 0.10 | 1.06 | 1.12 | 1.44 | 0.16 | 0.80 | 3.66 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.54 | -0.40 | -3.85 | -0.96 | ||
| GKL | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.32 | 1.64 | 0.01 | 2.14 | 5.27 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.92 | -0.44 | -2.46 | -0.16 | |
| 10.0 | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.48 | -1.76 | -2.96 | -4.29 | 0.56 | 1.16 | 2.96 | -0.30 | 0.99 | 4.09 | ||
| 0.10 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 1.31 | -0.03 | 0.67 | 4.15 | 0.54 | 0.89 | 1.84 | -1.79 | -1.27 | 24.2 | ||
| HJK | 1.00 | 0.78 | 1.06 | 1.50 | -1.06 | 0.78 | 6.86 | 0.39 | 1.07 | 2.20 | -2.37 | 0.84 | 34.6 | |
| 10.0 | 0.49 | 0.87 | 1.28 | -2.44 | -1.83 | 3.86 | 0.46 | 1.33 | 4.94 | -2.09 | 3.92 | 114 | ||
| Cell | Compounds | Papp*(10-6 cm/s) | Papp Ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A→B | B→A | |||
| Caco-2 | 2 µM SPH5030 | 1.45 | 7.31 | 4.91 |
| 10 µM SPH5030 | 0.53 | 1.26 | 12.37 | |
| 50 µM SPH5030 | 0.43 | 0.99 | 2.34 | |
| 10µM SPH5030+GF120918 | 2.01 | 1.23 | 0.66 | |
| MDCK-MDR1 | 10 µM SPH5030 | 0.21 | 1.43 | 7 |
| 10 µM SPH5030+10 µM GF120918 | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.51 | |
| MDCK-BCRP | 10 µM SPH5030 | 0.61 | 1.67 | 2.72 |
| 10 µM SPH5030+10 µM Ko143 | 0.72 | 0.51 | 0.70 | |
| MDCK-MDR1 | 10 µM Digoxin | 1.94 | 291 | 40.3 |
| 10 µM Digoxin + 10 µM SPH5030 | 5.07 | 324 | 17.2 | |
| 10 µM Digoxin + 50 µM SPH5030 | 8.31 | 224 | 7.25 | |
| MDCK-BCRP | 300 nM Imatinib | 0.49 | 6.67 | 3.64 |
| 300 nM Imatinib + 10 µM SPH5030 | 1.33 | 12.2 | 2.47 | |
| 300 nM Imatinib + 50 µM SPH5030 | 1.76 | 4.92 | 0.75 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).