Submitted:
27 September 2024
Posted:
29 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Energy State and Hydraulic Conductivity
3. Water Movement in Soil
4. Soluble Salts and Capillary Rise
5. Efflorescence and Cryptoflorescence
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Shaw, E.M.; Beven, K.J.; Chappell, N.A.; Lamb, R. Hydrology in practice, 4th ed.; CRC Press: London, United Kingdom, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porta, J.; Reguerín, M.; Roquero, C. Edafología para la agricultura y el medio ambiente, 3rd ed.; Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Maurício, A.M.; Pacheco, A.M.; Brito, P.S.; Castro, B.; Figueiredo, C.; Aires-Barros, L. An ionic conductivity-based methodology for monitoring salt systems in monuments stones. Journal of cultural heritage (JCH) 2005, 6, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marzal, R.M.E.; Franke, L.; Deckelmann, G. Predicting Efflorescence and Subflorescences of Salts. MRS Online Proceedings Library 2007, 1047, article number 403. [CrossRef]
- Doehne, E.; Price, C.A. Stone conservation: An overview of current research, 2nd ed.; Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Zedef, V.; Kocak, K.; Doyen, A.; Ozsen, H.; Kekec, B. Effect of salt crystallization on stones of historical buildings and monuments, Konya, Central Turkey. Building and environment 2007, 42, 1453–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallage, C.P.K.; Uchimura, T. Effects of dry density and grain size distribution on soil-water characteristic curves of sandy soils. Soils and foundations 2010, 50, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, M.R.; Gregorich, E. G. Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Youngs, E.G. Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils. In Soil and Environmental Analysis, 2nd ed.; Smith, K.A., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, USA, 2000; pp. 153–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawls, W.J.; Ahuja, L.R.; Brakensiek, D.L.; Shirmohammadi, A. Infiltration and soil water movement. In Handbook of Hydrology, 1st ed.; Maidment, D.R., Ed.; McGraw-Hill Inc.: New York, USA, 1992; 5.1-5.51 ref. 123. [Google Scholar]
- Morbidelli, R.; Saltalippi, C.; Flammini, A.; Govindaraju, R.S. Role of slope on infiltration: A review. Journal of Hydrology 2018, 557, 878–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patle, G.T.; Sikar, T.T.; Rawat, K.S.; Singh, S.K. Estimation of infiltration rate from soil properties using regression model for cultivated land. Geology, Ecology, and Landscapes 2019, 3, 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Ondrasek, G.; Rengel, Z. Environmental salinization processes: Detection, implications & solutions. Science of the Total Environment 2021, 754, 142432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zaman, M.; Shahid, S.A.; Heng, L. Guideline for salinity assessment, mitigation and adaptation using nuclear and related techniques, 1st ed.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aragüés, R.; Cerdá, A. Salinidad de aguas y suelos en la agricultura de regadío. In Agricultura Sostenible, 1st ed.; Jiménez, R., Lamo de Espinosa, J., Eds.; Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 1998; pp. 249–274. [Google Scholar]
- UNE 41805-5: 2009, IN. Building Diagnosis - Part 5 - Pathological study of the structure of the building - Masonry units. Available online: https://www.normadoc.com/english/une-41805-5-2009-in.html (accessed on 02 September 2024).
- Siedel, H. Salt efflorescence as indicator for sources of damaging salts on historic buildings and monuments: a statistical approach. Environ Earth Sci. 2018, 77, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koca, A.; Uğural, M.N.; Yaman, E. Rising Damp Treatment in Historical Buildings by Electro Osmosis: A Case Study. Buildings 2024, 14, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granneman, S.J.; Lubelli, B.; van Hees, R.P. Mitigating salt damage in building materials by the use of crystallization modifiers–a review and outlook. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2019, 40, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Non-saline | Slightly saline | Saline | Highly saline | |
| EC (dS m-1) | < 0.35 | 0.35 – 0.65 | 0.65 – 1.15 | > 1.15 |
| Non-sodic | Slightly sodic | Sodic | Highly sodic | |
| ESP (%) | < 7 | 7 - 15 | 15 - 30 | > 30 |
| Class | Presence in soils | Solubility (g L-1) |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorides | ||
| Sodium | Common | 264 |
| Magnesium | Common | 353 |
| Calcium | Very low | 400 – 500 |
| Potassium | Low | 344 |
| Sulfates | ||
| Sodium | Common | f(t)1 |
| Magnesium | Common | 262 |
| Potassium | Low | f(t)2 |
| Sodium carbonate | Sodic soils | 178 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | Sodic soils | 262 |
| Nitrates | Very low | High |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).