Submitted:
13 September 2024
Posted:
15 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Mixture Proportions
2.3. Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Setting Behavior of Specimens
3.2. Effect of Curing Temperature on Heat of Hydration
3.3. Compressive Strength Results
4. Conclusions
- Both OPC and FA cement showed a longer induction period as curing temperature decreased, consistent with the setting time results. This effect was stronger with higher FA content, as FA adsorbs calcium ions, lowering the Ca/Si ratio and producing calcium silicate hydrates with a reduced Ca/Si ratio.
- The heat of hydration decreased as FA content increased. Hydration reactions were inhibited at low temperatures and accelerated at high temperatures, with finely ground FA providing nucleation sites, enhancing the filler effect, and shortening the induction period.
- Compared to Plain, the higher FA content resulted in a greater decrease in compressive strength at low temperature. Plain showed a gradual strength increase after 28 days, while FA-containing specimens showed a larger increase due to the pozzolanic reaction of FA.
- Specimens cured at 43°C had a significant increase in 7-day compressive strength, particularly in FA-containing specimens. Plain specimens showed slow strength increases after 28 days, but FA-containing specimens experienced substantial gains, attributed to FA's pozzolanic reaction and temperature sensitivity.
- High FA content specimens had slower initial hydration and lower early strength, but the pozzolanic reaction led to significant long-term strength gains. FA's high temperature sensitivity requires careful consideration when using HVFA concrete.
- FA is more temperature-sensitive than other materials, making HVFA concrete highly susceptible to changes in properties due to climate or curing temperature. Environmental factors, such as temperature, should be considered in design and maintenance of HVFA concrete structures.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sivakrishna, A.; Adesina, A.; Awoyera, P.O.; Kumar, K.R. Green concrete: A review of recent developments. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 27, 54–58. [CrossRef]
- Coffetti, D.; Crotti, E.; Gazzaniga, G.; Carrara, M.; Pastore, T.; Coppola, L. Pathways towards sustainable concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2022, 154, 106718. [CrossRef]
- Chen, I.A.; Juenger, M.C.G. Synthesis and hydration of calcium sulfoaluminatebelite cements with varied phase compositions. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 2568–2577. [CrossRef]
- Trauchessec, R.; Mechling, J.M.; Lecomte, A.; Roux, A.; Le Rolland, B. Hydration of ordinary Portland cement and calcium sulfoaluminate cement blends. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2015, 56, 106–114. [CrossRef]
- Knight, K.A.; Cunningham, P.R.; Miller, S.A. Optimizing supplementary cementitious material replacement to minimize the environmental impacts of concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2023, 139, 105049. [CrossRef]
- Gil, D.M.; Golewski, G.L. Potential of siliceous fly ash and silica fume as a substitute for binder in cementitious concretes. E3S Web Conf. 2018, 49, 00030. [CrossRef]
- Shi, M.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, Z. Comparison of the properties between high-volume fly ash concrete and high-volume steel slag concrete under temperature matching curing condition. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 98. 649–655. [CrossRef]
- Langan, B.W.; Weng, K.; Ward, M.A. Effect of silica fume and fly ash on heat of hydration of Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 1045–1051. [CrossRef]
- Scrivener, K.L.; Nonat, A. Hydration of cementitious materials, present and future. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 651–665. [CrossRef]
- Skibsted, J.; Snellings, R. Reactivity of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in cement blends. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 124, 105799. [CrossRef]
- Sumer, M. Compressive strength and sulfate resistance properties of concretes containing Class F and Class C fly ashes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 34, 531–536. [CrossRef]
- Yan, X.; Jiang, L.; Guo, M.; Chen, Y.; Song, Z.; Bian, R. Evaluation of sulfate resistance of slag contained concrete under steam curing. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 195, 231–237. [CrossRef]
- Ortiz Lozano, J.A.; Aguado de Cea, A.; Agulló, L.; García Vicente, T.; Zermeño de León, M.E. Experimental study of the effect of temperature on the strength of ready-mixed concrete. Theory. Materiales de Construccion. 2008, 58, 7-22. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Sha, A.; Hu, L.; Zou, X. A laboratory study of Portland cement hydration under low temperatures. Road. Mater. Pavement Des. 2017, 18, 12–22. [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Li, L.; Gao, J.; Li, Y.; Lou, B.; Diego, M.B.; Ye, T.; Sha, A. Frost-related damage of portland cement pastes at early age. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2023, 35. [CrossRef]
- Barkhordari, M.S.; Armaghani, D.J.; Mohammed, A.S.; Ulrikh, D.V. Data-Driven Compressive Strength Prediction of Fly Ash Concrete Using Ensemble Learner Algorithms. Buildings. 2022, 12, 132. [CrossRef]
- Abdalla, A.; Salih, A. Microstructure and chemical characterizations with soft computing models to evaluate the influence of calcium oxide and silicon dioxide in the fly ash and cement kiln dust on the compressive strength of cement mortar. Resour., Conserv. Recycl. Adv. 2022, 15, 200090. [CrossRef]
- Jaf, D.K.I.; Abdulrahman, A.S.; Abdulrahman, P.I.; Mohammed, A.S.; Kurda, R.; Ahmed, H.U.; Faraj, R.H. Effitioned soft computing models to evaluate the impact of silicon dioxide (SiO2) to calcium oxide (CaO) ratio in fly ash on the compressive strength of concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 74, 106820. [CrossRef]
- Han, F.; He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J. Hydration heat of slag or fly ash in the composite binder at different temperatures. Thermochim. Acta. 2017, 655, 202–210. [CrossRef]
- Narmluk, M.; Nawa, T. Effect of fly ash on the kinetics of Portland cement hydration at different curing temperatures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 579–589. [CrossRef]
- Elkhadiri, I.; Puertas, F. The effect of curing temperature on sulphate-resistant cement hydration and strength. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1331-1341. [CrossRef]
- Parry-Jones, G.; Al-Tayyib, A.H.J.; Al-Dulaijin, S.U.; Al-Mana, A.I. Si. MAS-NMR hydration and compressive strength study in cement paste. Cem. Concr. Res. 1989, 19, 228-234. [CrossRef]
- Escalante-Garcı́a, J.I.; Sharp, J.H. Effect of temperature on the hydration of the main clinker phases in portland cements: part ii, blended cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 1998, 28, 1259-1274. [CrossRef]
- Dittrich, S.; Neubauer, J.; Goetz-Neunhoeffer, F. The influence of fly ash on the hydration of OPC within the first 44h—A quantitative in situ XRD and heat flow calorimetry study. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 56, 129–138. [CrossRef]
- Hou, D.; Ma, H.; Li, Z. Morphology of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gel: a molecular dynamic study. Adv. Cem. Res. 2015, 27, 135–146. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Hou, D.; Jiang, J.; Wang, P. Chloride ions transport and adsorption in the nano-pores of silicate calcium hydrate: Experimental and molecular dynamics studies. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 126, 991–1001. [CrossRef]
- Hou, D.; Ma, H.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z. Calcium silicate hydrate from dry to saturated state: structure, dynamics and mechanical properties. Acta Mater. 2014, 67, 81–94. [CrossRef]
- Vydra, V.; Kapičková, O.; Demo, P.; Semerák, P. Influence of temperature on induction period and on ultimate porosity of hardening cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 1262-1266. [CrossRef]
- Baert, G.; Hoste, S.; De Schutter, G.; De Belie, N. Reactivity of fly ash in cement paste studied by means of thermogravimetry and isothermal calorimetry. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2008, 94, 485–492. [CrossRef]
- Dyer, T.D.; Dhir, R.K. Hydration reactions of cement combinations containing vitrified incinerator fly ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 849–856. [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Huang, T.; Yuan, Q.; Zhou, D.; Deng, D. Zhang, L. Temperature dependence of structural build-up and its relation with hydration kinetics of cement paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 201, 553–562. [CrossRef]
- Park, B.; Choi, Y.C. Effects of fineness and chemical activators on the hydration and physical properties of high-volume fly-ash cement pastes. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 51, 104274. [CrossRef]
- Poole, J.L.; Riding, K.A.; Folliard, K.J.; Juenger, M.C.; Schindler, A.K. Methods for calculating activation energy for Portland cement. ACI Mater. J. 2007, 104, 303–311. [CrossRef]
- Schindler, A.K. Effect of temperature on hydration of cementitious materials. ACI Mater. J. 2004, 101, 72–81. [CrossRef]
- Rahhal, V.; Talero, R. Influence of two different fly ashes on the hydration of Portland cements. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2004, 78, 191–205. [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Ye, G. The pore structure of cement paste blended with fly ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 45, 30–35. [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Liamazos, E.; Baxter, L.; Fonseca, F. Durability of biomass fly ash concrete: freezing and thawing and rapid chloride permeability tests. Fuel 2008, 87, 359–364. [CrossRef]
- Hou, P.K.; Kawashima, S.; Wang, K.J.; Corr, D.J.; Qian, J.S.; Shah, S.P. Effects of colloidal nanosilica on rheological and mechanical properties of fly ash–cement mortar. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2013, 35, 12–22. [CrossRef]
- Escalante-Garcia, J.I. Nonevaporable water from neat OPC and replacement materials in composite cements hydrated at different temperatures. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 1883–1888. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Yang, J. Hydration mechanisms of composite binders containing phosphorus slag at different temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 147, 720–732. [CrossRef]
- Han, S.H.; Kim, J.K.; Park, Y.D. Prediction of compressive strength of fly ash concrete by new apparent activation energy function. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 965–971. [CrossRef]
- Bentz, D. P. Activation energies of high-volume fly ash ternary blends: Hydration and setting. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 53, 214–223. [CrossRef]












| Chemical compositions (% by mass) | |||||||||
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | K2O | Na2O | SO3 | LOI | |
| OPC | 20.8 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 61.8 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 1.1 |
| FA | 51.3 | 23.7 | 7.8 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 3.6 |
| Variables | Water (kg/m3) | Water Binder ratio (-) | Binder (kg/m3) |
Aggregate (kg/m3) | |||
| OPC | FA | FA-F | Fine | Coarse | |||
| Plain | 170 | 0.45 | 380 | - | - | 720 | 1033 |
| FC35 | 165 | 0.39 | 273 | 147 | - | 690 | 989 |
| FC55 | 125 | 0.28 | 200 | 244 | - | 710 | 1019 |
| FC55F | 125 | 0.28 | 200 | 122 | 122 | 710 | 1019 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).