Submitted:
12 September 2024
Posted:
13 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
- Design of a pandemic-compliant mechanism for effective monitoring of the adherence to bio-safety norms notified for influenza-type virus infections. The mechanism is configured to perform facemask-wearing detection, social-distance norm adherence, contact tracing etc.
- Edge nodes designed using Grove AI Hat and Raspberry Pi4 trained, tested and synchronized with cloud resident DL tools are deployed as part of a residential complex.
- Most importantly, several pre-trained DL models are configured to formulate a hybrid platform named HMAADNDS which effectively performs multiple tasks including the detection of cyber-attacks.
2. Proposed Pandemic Compliant Perceptive Infrastructure Design
2.1. Setting Up IoT, Edge, and Cloud Computing Framework for Protocol Monitoring and Contact Tracing
2.2. Proposed Hybrid Multi-Head Attention-Aided Multi-Tasking Deep Network with Diffusion Stability (HMAAHDNDS)
2.3. Face Mask Recognition Utilizing Multiple ML/DL Methods Deployed on Cloud Platforms
2.4. Monitoring Compliance with Social Distancing Norms (SDN)
2.5. Implementing Contact Tracing in Public Spaces and Residential Communities
2.6. Text to Image Generation
2.7. Enhancing Cyber-Attack Detection
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Facemask Detection Experimental Findings
3.2. Evaluation of Social Distancing Measures
3.3. Contact Tracing: Tracking and Managing Exposure Risks
3.4. Impact Assessment of the Proposed System Architecture
3.5. Validation of Component Block Capabilities in Detecting Cyber-attacks within the Proposed System
4. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- C.Turni. et al.,“COVID-19 vaccines-An Australian Review," in Journal of Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 491-508, August 2020.
- H. Abid, J. Mohd, and V.Raju, “Effects of COVID 19 pandemic in daily life," in Curr. Med. Res. Pract., 2020. [CrossRef]
- Y. Wang, Z. Deng and d. shi, “How effective is a mask in preventing COVID?19 infection?" in Medical devices & sensors, vol. 4, no. 1, 2021, e10163. [CrossRef]
- O. Kwon, “Evidence of the importance of contact tracing in fighting COVID-19," in Epidemiology and Health, 44, 2022. [CrossRef]
- K. Jones and R. Thompson, “To use or not to use a COVID-19 contact tracing app: Mixed methods survey in Wales." in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, vol. 9, no. 11, 2021, e29181. [CrossRef]
- O. Saidi, D. Malouche, P. Saksena, L. Arfaoui, “Impact of contact tracing, respect of isolation, and lockdown in reducing the number of cases infected with COVID-19. " in International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 113, pp. 26-33, May 2020. [CrossRef]
- R. M.Stuart, R. G. Abeysuriya, C. C. Kerr, D. Mistry et al., "Role of masks, testing and contact tracing in preventing COVID-19 resurgences: a case study from New South Wales, Australia." in BMJ open, vol. 11, no. 4, e045941, 2021. [CrossRef]
- A. Prasad, & D. Kotz, "ENACT: encounter-based architecture for contact tracing." in Proceedings of the 4th International on Workshop on Physical Analytics, pp. 37-42, June 2017.
- R. Vinuesa, H. Azizpour, I. Leite et al., "The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals." in Nature communications, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2020.
- "Water, sanitation, hygiene and waste management for COVID-19: technical brief", in World Health Organization, 03 March 2020, (No.WHO/2019 – NcOV/IPCWASH/2020.1).
- R. Ellis, "WHO changes stance, says public should wear masks." in WebMD.
- R. Jahromi, V. Mogharab, H. Jahromi & A. Avazpour, "Synergistic effects of anionic surfactants on coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) virucidal efficiency of sanitizing fluids to fight COVID-19." in Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 145, 111702, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Feng, C. Shen, N. Xia et al., "Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic." in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 434-436, 2020. [CrossRef]
- "Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance," in World Health Organization, 5 June 2020, (No.WHO/2019 – nCoV/IPCMasks/2020.4).
- A. C. Prajapati, M. M. Patel, H. J. Khanpara et al., "A Hospital based cross sectional study to find out factors associated with disease severity and length of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients in Tertiary Care Hospital of Ahmedabad city." in Indian Journal of Community Health, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 256-259.
- B. Qin & D. Li, "Identifying facemask-wearing condition using image super-resolution with classification network to prevent COVID-19." in Sensors, vol. 20, no. 18, pp. 5236. [CrossRef]
- M. S. Ejaz, M. R. Islam et al., "Implementation of principal component analysis on masked and non-masked face recognition." in 1st international conference on advances in science, engineering and robotics technology (ICASERT),IEEE, pp. 1-5, 2019.
- J. S. Park, Y. Oh et al., "Glasses removal from facial image using recursive error compensation." inIEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 805-811, 2005. [CrossRef]
- C. Li, R. Wang et al., "Face detection based on YOLOv3. In Recent Trends in Intelligent Computing," in Communication and Devices: Proceedings of ICCD pp. 277-284, Springer, Singapore, 2018.
- N. U. Din, K. Javed et al., "A novel GAN-based network for unmasking of masked face." in IEEE Access, 8, pp. 44276-44287, 2020.
- H. Habibzadeh, K. Dinesh et al., "A survey of healthcare Internet of Things (HIoT): A clinical perspective." in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 53-71, 2019. [CrossRef]
- T. Wu, F. Wu, et al., "A rigid-flex wearable health monitoring sensor patch for IoT-connected healthcare applications." in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 6932-6945,2020.
- S. Esmaeili, S.Tabbakh, et al., "A priority-aware lightweight secure sensing model for body area networks with clinical healthcare applications in Internet of Things." in Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 69, 101265, 2020. [CrossRef]
- W. Huifeng, S. N. Kadry, et al., "Continuous health monitoring of sportsperson using IoT devices based wearable technology." in Computer Communications, vol. 160, pp. 588-595, 2020.
- C. M. Dourado, S. P. P. da Silva, et al., "An open IoHT-based deep learning framework for online medical image recognition." in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 541-548, 2020.
- P. P. Ray, N. Thapa, et al., "Novel implementation of IoT based non-invasive sensor system for real-time monitoring of intravenous fluid level for assistive e-healthcare." in Circuit World, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 109-123.
- J. Das, S. Ghosh, et al., "RESCUE: enabling green healthcare services using integrated IoT?edge?fog?cloud computing environments." in Software: Practice and Experience, vol. 52, no.7, pp. 1615-1642, 2022.
- A. Kumar, K. Sharma, K., et al., "A drone-based networked system and methods for combating coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. " in Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 115, pp. 1-19, 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. Tuli, S., R. Tuli, & S. S. Gill, "Predicting the growth and trend of COVID-19 pandemic using machine learning and cloud computing." in Internet of things, vol. 11, 100222, 2020. [CrossRef]
- N. Khan, N., A. Ullah, & K. Polat, "DCA-IoMT: Knowledge-Graph-Embedding-Enhanced Deep Collaborative Alert Recommendation Against COVID-19." in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 8924-8935, 2022.
- X. Lin, J. Wu, J., et al., "FairHealth: Long-term proportional fairness-driven 5G edge healthcare in Internet of medical things." in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 8905-8915, 2022.
- F. Desai, D. Chowdhury, et al., "Health Cloud: A system for monitoring health status of heart patients using machine learning and cloud computing." in Internet of Things, vol. 17, 100485, 2022.
- N. K. Dewangan & P. Chandrakar, "Patient-centric token-based healthcare blockchain implementation using secure internet of medical things." in IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2022.
- W. Lv, S. Wu, et al., "Towards large-scale and privacy-preserving contact tracing in COVID-19 pandemic: a blockchain perspective." in IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 282-298, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Kumar, R. D. Raut, et al.,"The impact of IoT on the performance of vaccine supply chain distribution in the COVID-19 context." in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2022.
- W. Hariri, "Efficient masked face recognition method during the covid-19 pandemic." in Signal, image and video processing, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 605-612, 2022. [CrossRef]
- X. Wang, E. G. Ferro, et al., "Association between universal masking in a health care system and SARS-CoV-2 positivity among health care workers." in Jama, vol. 324, no. 7, pp. 703-704, 2020.
- N. H. Leung, D. K.Chu, et al., "Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nature medicine", vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 676-680, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Feng, S. Shen, et al., "Rational use of face masks in the COVID-19 pandemic." in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 434-436, 2020. [CrossRef]
- R. B. McFee, "COVID-19 medical management including World Health Organization (WHO) suggested management strategies." in Disease-a-Month, vol. 66, no. 9, 101068, 2020. [CrossRef]
- B. Kneis, "Face detection for crowd analysis using deep convolutional neural networks." In Engineering Applications of Neural Networks: 19th International Conference, Springer International Publishing, EANN 2018, Bristol, UK, Proceedings 19, pp. 71-80, 2018.
- S. K. Addagarla, G. K. Chakravarthi, et al.,(2020) "Real time multi-scale facial mask detection and classification using deep transfer learning techniques." in International Journal, vol. 9, no.4, pp. 4402-4408, 2020.
- X. Su, M. Gao, et al., "Facemask detection and classification via deep transfer learning." in Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp. 1-20, 2022.
- A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, et al., "Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks." Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 25, 2012.
- C. Vimal, & N. Shirivastava, "Face and Face-mask Detection System using VGG-16 Architecture based on Convolutional Neural Network." in International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 975, 8887, 2022.
- A. Faisal, T. N. A. Dharma, et al., "Comparative study of VGG16 and MobileNetv2 for masked face recognition." in JurnalIlmiah Teknik ElektroKomputer dan Informatika (JITEKI), pp. 230-237, 2021.
- M. Utomo, & F. Violita,"Face Mask Wearing Detection Using Support Vector Machine (SVM)." in IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 72-81, 2021.
- P. Sermanet, D. Eigen, "Overfeat: Integrated recognition, localization and detection using convolutional networks." arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6229. [CrossRef]
- D. Erhan, et al., "Scalable object detection using deep neural networks." In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 2147-2154, 2014.
- J. Redmon, S. Divvala, et al., "You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection." In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 779-788, 2016.
- M. Inamdar, & N. Mehendale, "Real-time face mask identification using facemasknet deep learning network." Available at SSRN 3663305, 2020.
- S. Qiao, C. Liu, et al., "Few-shot image recognition by predicting parameters from activations." In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 7229-7238, 2018.
- A. Kumar, Z. J. Zhang, & H. Lyu, "Object detection in real time based on improved single shot multi-box detector algorithm." in EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, pp. 1-18, 2020.
- A. Morera, A. Sanchez, et al. "SSD vs. YOLO for detection of outdoor urban advertising panels under multiple variabilities." in Sensors, vol. 20, no. 16, 4587, 2020. [CrossRef]
- K. Zhang, Z. Zhang, et al. "Joint face detection and alignment using multi task cascaded convolutional networks." in IEEE signal processing letters, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1499-1503, 2016.
- A. Alzu’bi, F. Albalas, et al., "Masked face recognition using deep learning: A review." in Electronics, vol. 10, no. 21, 2666, 2021.
- C. R. MacIntyre, & A. A. Chughtai, "Facemasks for the prevention of infection in healthcare and community settings", in Bmj, vol.350. [CrossRef]
- G. H. Christa, et al., "CNN-based mask detection system using openCV and MobileNetV2." In 2021 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication (ICPSC), pp. 115-119, IEEE, (2021, May).
- S. E. Snyder, & G. Husari, "Thor: A deep learning approach for face mask detection to prevent the COVID-19 pandemic." In Southeast Con, pp. 1-8, IEEE, March 2021.
- S. Hussain, Y. Yu, et al., "IoT and deep learning based approach for rapid screening and face mask detection for infection spread control of COVID-19." in Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 8, 3495, 2021.
- I. Ahmed, I., M. Ahmad, & G. Jeon, "Social distance monitoring framework using deep learning architecture to control infection transmission of COVID-19 pandemic." in Sustainable cities and society, vol. 69, 102777, 2021. [CrossRef]
- E. Fonseca, et al., "General-purpose tagging of free sound audio with audio set labels: Task description, dataset, and baseline." arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.09902, 2018. [CrossRef]
- R. Girshick, "Fast r-cnn." In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 1440-1448.
- B.Pfitzner, N. Steckhan & B.Anrich,"Federated Learning in a Medical Context: A Systematic Literature Review", University of Potsdam, in Germany ACM Trans., Internet Technol., Vol. 21, No. 2, Article 50, Publication date: May 2021.DOI: . [CrossRef]
- I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, & A. Couville, "Deep Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning series." in Nature., 2016.
- J. Park, J., J. Jung, S. Eun, & S. Y. Yun, "Ui elements identification for mobile applications based on deep learning using symbol marker" in The J Ins Int Broadcasting Communication.3rd ed., pp. 89-95, 2020. [CrossRef]
- R. Keniya, & N. Mehendale, "Real-time social distancing detector using SocialdistancingNet-19 deep learning network." in SSRN., 2020. [CrossRef]
- W. Vijitkunsawat & P. Chantngarm, "Study of the Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms for Face Mask Detection." in IEEE, ISBN NO 978-1-7281-6694-0/20, 2020 IEEE, 2020.
- "COVID-19 Map—Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center." at Johns Hopkins University. Available online: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessed on 8 May 2012)., (2020, July 30).
- S. V. Militante & N. V. Dionisio, N. V. "Deep Learning Implementation of Facemask and Physical Distancing Detection with Alarm Systems." in The Third International Conference on Vocational Education and Electrical Engineering (ICVEE)., 2020. [CrossRef]
- R. Jahromi, V. Mogharab, et al., "Synergistic effects of anionic surfactants on corona virus (SARS-CoV-2) viricidal efficiency of sanitizing fluids to fight COVID-19." BioRxiv, 2020. [CrossRef]
- R. Ellis, "WHO Changes Stance, Says Public Should Wear Masks." News. hAvailable online: ttps://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200608/who-changes-stance-says-public-should-wear-masks (accessed on 8 May 2012).
- K. He, G. Gkioxari, et al., "Mask r-cnn "In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision., pp. 2961-2969.
- W. Liu, & D. Anguelov, "Ssd: Single shot multibox detector." In European Conference on Computer Vision., Springer.pp. 21-37,2016.
- J. Redmon & A. Farhadi, "Yolov3: An incremental improvement.", IEEE. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.02767 (accessed on 8 May 2012)., 2018.
- S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, & J. Sun, "Faster r-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks." IEEE. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.01497, 2015. [CrossRef]
- A. Naezullaev, "Contact Tracing of Infectious Diseases using Wi-Fi signals and Machine Learning classifications." in IEEE, 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Mondal & P. Mitra, P. "The Role of Emerging Technologies to Fight against COVID?19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Review." in Transactions of the Indian National Academy of Engineering, 7th ed., p. 157-174, 2022. [CrossRef]
- H. Lukas, Y. Yu, W. Gao & C. Xu, "Emerging Telemedicine Tools for Remote COVID-19 Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Management." , pp. 16180-16193. American Chemical Society. Available online: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c08494 (accessed on 8 May 2012)., 2020.
- A. A. Alzubi, M. A. Matiah & A. Alarifi, "Cyber-attack detection in healthcare using cyber-physical system and machine learning system." in Computing, Springer Nature., 2021. [CrossRef]
- L. Khriji, & S. Bouaafia, "Secure Convolutional Neural Network-Based Internet-of-Healthcare Applications." in IEEE Access, 2023. [CrossRef]
- H. Ku & M. Lee, "Text Control GAN: Text to image synthesis with controllable Generative Adversarial Networks." in Applied Sciences, MDPI, 2023. [CrossRef]
- R. Sawant, A. Shaikh, S. Sabat , & V. Bhole, "Text to Image Generation using GAN.",2nd International Conference on IoT Based Control Networks and Intelligent Systems,2021.
- C. H. Loke, M. S. Adam, et al., "Physical distancing device with edge computing for covid-19 (paddie-c19)." in Sensors, vol. 22, no. 1, 279, 2021. [CrossRef]











| Item | Description | Node |
| DNN model | YOLOv4 | Raspberry Pi 4 (Edge) |
| Programming based on | Python | |
| RAM in GB | 4GB | |
| Processor | ARM Cortex-72 | |
| Clock in GHz | 1.5 | |
| GPU | Pi 3 A+: Broadcom VideoCore IV; 400 MHz |
|
| DNN model | Kmodel | Grove AI HAT (Edge) |
| Programming based on | MicroPython | |
| RAM in GB | 0.008 | |
| Processor | M1 K210 RISC-V | |
| Clock in GHz | 0.4-0.6 | |
| GPU | KPU | |
| Maximum training time | 121 minutes | |
| Response time after training | 2 seconds | |
| DNN model | RESNET-50, YOLOv4, MobileNet, VGG-16, SocialDistanceNet-19 etc |
Google Colab |
| Programming based on | Python | |
| RAM in GB | 32 | |
| Processor | Intel® Xeon® Gold 5318N |
|
| Clock in GHz | 2.25 | |
| GPU | Tesla T4 |
| Sl.No | Sensor Type | Specifications |
| 1 | Ultrasonic sensor | HC-SR04-SEN-15569 Analog and digital connection. Baud Rate=9600 I/P voltage=5v Working temp= -150-700c Sensing angle=300 cone Ultrasonic frequency=40KHz; Range=2cm-400cm |
| 2 | Infrared Temperature Sensor | MLX90614 Vcc pin of the sensor with the Vin of the node Operating voltage=3.6v to 5 v Supply current=1.5mA Object temperature range= -700-382.20 c Ambient temperature range= -400c to 1250 c FOV=800 Distance between object and sensor= 2 cm to 5 cm |
| 3 | Proximity Sensor | PSAM8/ HC-SR04 Vcc-à +5v GND of sensor is connected to GND of Raspberry Pi; Data Pin(IR sensor) is connected to PIN 16 Supply voltage=10v to 30v Frequency=800Hz Working temp= -250-700c Long range detection Range=30mm-50mm Range upto 600cm |
| 4 | IR camera | MLX90640 Vcc-à +5v GND of sensor to GND of Raspberry Pi OutàGPIO pin Small size; low cost; Supply voltage= 3v; FOV(2 options): 550x350 and 1100x 750 target temperature= -400 c-3000c 32x24 pixels in IR array; I2C protocol, Range=1cm-100cm |
| 5 | Wi-Fi Router | XLT24017 Wireless LAN Transmission range= 150 m; Frequency= 2.4GHz; High stability built in PLL; Low clutter leakage; Size(L x W): 18.3x17.6 mm, Range=30m-100m |
| 6 | Conventional CCTV Camera | Philips HSP 3500 Wireless Low light range-10 meters; Day time -20-25 meters |
| Sl. No | Task | Input Types | Output Types |
| 1 | Facemask detection |
Image | Yes/no binary decision |
| 2 | Proper facemask wearing |
Image | Yes/no Male/female Indoor/outdoor |
| 3 | Classification of facemask |
Image | Class 1, Class 2 |
| 4 | Social distancing |
Image and sensor data |
Violation Yes/no |
| 5 | Contact tracing |
Image and sensor data |
Data |
| 6 | Cyberattack | Text data, image | Class labels |
| 7 | Text to image generator |
Text description from (1), (2), (3), (4) obtained in table and applied as CSV file |
Image |
| 8 | Action detection | Image | Cough, sneeze |
| Sl. No | Cyber-attacks on data gathering phase |
Cyber-attacks at Network Phase |
Cyber-attacks at storage phase |
| 1 | Phishing | Eavesdropping of health record |
Cross site scripting |
| 2 | Log Access | Man in the middle attack |
Weak authentication attack |
| 3 | Social Engineering Network |
Data tempering |
SQL injection attack |
| 4 | Brute force attack on passwords |
Denial of the service attack |
|
| Data Interception | |||
| Spoofing and sniffing attack |
| Sl. No |
Method | Layer type | Batch Size | Trainable parameters |
Epoch |
| 1 | ANN [67] | Pooling layer, dense layer |
5 | 430562 | 20 |
| 2 | CNN | Pooling layer, dense layer |
32 | 449059 | 25 |
| 3 | RF | Pooling layer, dense layer |
32 | 425256 | 15 |
| 4 | DT | Pooling layer, dense layer |
32 | 497852 | 20 |
| 5 | SVM [66] | Pooling layer, dense layer |
32 | 422285 | 30 |
| 6 | RESNET-50 | ResNet-50, pooling layer, dense layer |
32 | 23591810 | 10 |
| 7 | MOBILENET | MobileNetV2, pooling layer, dense layer |
32 | 2260546 | 20 |
| 8 | VGG-16 [65] | VGG-16-layer, pooling layer, dense layer |
32 | 14715714 | 20 |
| Sl.No | Models | Trainable parameters | Layer type | Batch size |
| 1 | MOBILENET | 2261827 | Conv2d, max pooling layer, dropout, dense layer, flatten layer |
7x7x1280 |
| 2 | RESNET-50 | 449059 | 244x244x32 | |
| 3 | CNN | 1759842 | 244x244x32 |
| Sl.No | Model | Parameters | |||||
| No. of layer | Epoch | Optimizer | Training dataset |
Learning objective | Composition of layers | ||
| 1 | ResNet-50 | Input layer-1 Zero padding layer-2 Relu layer-1 Dense layer-6 |
20 | Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) |
4098 | Scale conjugate gradient | Conv layer 224 x 224 x 32 Max-pooling layer 112x112x32 |
| 2 | MobileNetV2 | Input layer-1 Zero padding layer-2 Relu layer-2 Dense layer-2 |
20 | Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) |
3843 | Scale conjugate gradient | 7 x 7 x 1280 |
| 3 | SocialdistancingNet-19 | Input layer-1 Zero padding layer-2 Relu layer-1 Dense layer-2 |
20 | Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) |
2598 | Scale conjugate gradient | Conv layer 244 x 244 x 32 Maxpooling layer 112 x 112 x 32 |
| Sl.No | Model | Parameters | |||||
| No. of layers | Training | Epoch | Optimizer | Learning objective |
Composition of layers |
||
| 1 | ResNet-50 | Input layer-1 Zero padding layer-2 Relu layer-1 Dense layer-6 |
4098 | 20 | Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) |
Scale conjugate gradient |
Conv layer 224x224x32; max-pooling layer 112x112x32 |
| 2 | MobileNetV2 | Input layer-1 Zero padding layer-2 Relu layer-2 Dense layer-2 |
3843 | 25 | Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) |
Scale conjugate gradient |
7x7x1280 |
| 3 | VGG-16 | Input layer-1 Zero padding layer-2 Relu layer-1 Dense layer-2 |
2598 | 25 | Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) |
Scale conjugate gradient |
Conv layer 244x244x32 max pooling layer 112x112x32 |
| 4 | SVM | Conv2d, max pooling, dropout, dense layer, flatten layer |
8450 | 20 | Adaptive moment estimation (Adam) |
Scale conjugate gradient |
Conv layer 244x244x32 max pooling layer 122x122x32 |
| 5 | DT | 8450 | 20 | ||||
| 6 | KNN | 8450 | 20 | ||||
| 7 | LR | 8450 | 20 | ||||
| SL. No |
MODEL | C L A S S |
R E C A L L |
S U P P O R T |
CONFUSION Matrix |
Fl Score |
P R E C I S I O N |
A C C U R A C Y (%) |
ACCURACY (%) (PREVIOUS WORK) |
| 1 | ANN | 0 | 0.33 | 761 | [634 127] | 0.81 | 0.79 | 80 | 75.5 [14] |
| 1 | 0.78 | 750 | [168 5321 | 0.80 | 0.82 | 80 | |||
| 2 | DT | 0 | 0.71 | 729 | [519 210] | 0.70 | 0.68 | 70 | 100[15] |
| 1 | 0.69 | 782 | [240 542] | 0.71 | 0.72 | 70 | |||
| 3 | RT | 0 | 0.83 | 729 | [605 124] | 0.78 | 0.73 | 77 | 100 [15] |
| 1 | 0.72 | 782 | [222 560] | 0.75 | 0.82 | 77 | |||
| 4 | SVM | 0 | 0.31 | 729 | [594 135] | 0.75 | [594 135] | 74 | 100 [15] |
| 1 | 0.67 | 782 | [261 521] | 0.72 | [261 521] | 74 | |||
| 5 | VGG-16 | 0 | 0.99 | 761 | [588 5] | 0.98 | [588 5] | 98 | 96 [16] |
| 1 | 0.96 | 750 | [23 592] | 0.98 | [23 592] | 98 | |||
| 6 | CNN | 0 | 0.96 | 761 | [568 25] | 0.94 | [568 25] | 94 | 93.4 [16] |
| 1 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 750 | [43 572] | 94 | |||
| 7 | RESNET50 | 0 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 745 | [651 94] | 94 | 90.1 [16] |
| 1 | 0.89 | 0.99 | 0.94 | 765 | [4 751] | 94 | |||
| 8 | MOBILE NETV2 |
0 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 756 | [704 52] | 92 | 92.64[16] |
| 1 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 754 | [62 692] | 92 |
| Sl. No | Model | Class | F1 score |
Precision | Support | Recall | Confusion Matrix |
Accuracy (%) |
| 1 | ResNet-50 | 0 | 0.88 | 0.99 | 147 | 0.80 | [117 23 7] | 92 |
| 1 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 137 | 0.97 | [1 133 3] | 92 | ||
| 2 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 131 | 0.99 | [0 1 130] | 92 | ||
| 2 | MobileNetV2 | 0 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 147 | 0.87 | [131 9 7] | 97.2 |
| 1 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 137 | 0.97 | [3 133 1] | 97.2 | ||
| 2 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 131 | 0.90 | [8 5 118] | 97.2 | ||
| 3 | ResNet-50 [47] |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 47.91 |
| 4 | MobileNetV2 [46] |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 92.64 |
| Sl. No |
Method | Class | F1- score |
Confusion Matrix |
Recall | Precision | Accuracy (%) |
| 1 | ResNet-50 | 0 | 0.93 | [252 17] | 0.94 | 0.92 | 94 |
| 1 | 0.95 | [22 357] | 0.94 | 0.95 | 94 | ||
| 2 | MobileNetV2 | 0 | 0.63 | [146 123] | 0.54 | 0.74 | 75 |
| 1 | 0.79 | [52 327] | 0.86 | 0.73 | 75 | ||
| 3 | CNN | 0 | 0.74 | [198 71] | 0.71 | 0.74 | 79 |
| 1 | 0.82 | [68 311] | 0.82 | 0.81 | 79 | ||
| 4 | MobileNetV2 [46] |
- | - | - | - | - | 97.08 |
| 5 | ResNet-50 [47] |
- | - | - | - | - | 92.49 |
| 6 | CNN [20] | - | - | - | - | - | 70 |
| Reference | Model | Classification | Accuracy (%) |
| [1] | ResNet-50 | YES | 89 |
| [2] | ResNet-50 | YES | 81 |
| [3] | ResNet-50 | YES | 95.8 |
| [4] | ResNet-50 | YES | 88.2 |
| [6] | ResNet-50 | YES | 98.6 |
| [7] | ResNet-50 | YES | 97.9 |
| [8] | ResNet-50 | YES | 92.5 |
| This work | Proposed Model | YES | 93.5 |
| Sl. No |
Action | Model | Performance | |
| F1-Score | Accuracy (%) | |||
| 1 | Person detection | ResNet-50 | 0.90 | 87.6 |
| MobileNetV2 | 0.95 | 89.9 | ||
| 2 | Social distancing | SocialdistancingNet-19 | 0.89 | 94.5 |
| 3 | [67] | SocialdistancingNet-19 | — | 92.8 |
| Sl. No | Model | Accuracy of previously reported work (%) |
Accuracy (%) |
| 1 | VGG-16 [45] | 89.6 | 92.3 |
| 2 | MobileNetV2[46] | 78.5 | 93.4 |
| 3 | ResNet-50[61] | 83.4 | 96.1 |
| 4 | SVM [47] | 91 | 94.6 |
| 5 | DT [77] | 87 | 91.3 |
| 6 | KNN [77] | 88 | 92.5 |
| 7 | LR [77] | 89 | 93.6 |
| Sl. No. | Block | Specific item | Average error at system level |
Average error at node level |
| 1 | Sensor type | Camera | 3.80% | 4% |
| IR thermometer | 3.50% | 5% | ||
| Proximity sensor | 2.80% | 3% | ||
| Ultra-sonic | 2.40% | 3% | ||
| 2 | Decision support for facemask |
Low (30 person/ hour) |
8.5% | 9.2% |
| Medium (50 persons/ hour) |
8.8% | 11% | ||
| High (70 persons / hour) |
9.3% | 12% | ||
| 3 | Decision support for social distance |
Low (30 person/ hour) | 3.40% | 9% |
| Medium (50 persons/ hour) | 4.50% | 12% | ||
| High (70 persons / hour) | 4.50% | 13% | ||
| 4 | Decision support for contact tracing |
Low (30 person/ hour) | 3.80% | 8.5% |
| Medium (50 persons/ hour) | 3.40% | 10% | ||
| High (70 persons / hour) | 4.50% | 12% | ||
| 5 | Latency variation (average) |
Low (30 person/ hour) | 7.5% | 9% |
| Medium (50 persons/ hour) | 11% | 14% | ||
| High (70 persons / hour) | 14% | 15% |
| Sl. No |
Specific Purpose |
Training Data Set (80%) |
Testing Data Set (20%) |
Technique | Response Time (ms) |
Testing Time (s) |
Training Time (s) |
| 1 | Face Mask wearing |
6042 | 1510 | ANN | 22.4 | 446 | 1790 |
| CNN | 24.05 | 432 | 1875 | ||||
| RF | 20.9 | 446 | 1700 | ||||
| SVM | 22 | 430 | 1750 | ||||
| DT | 22.4 | 446 | 1790 | ||||
| VGG-16 | 141.75 | 775 | 9300 | ||||
| RESNET-50 | 133 | 770 | 8750 | ||||
| MOBILENET | 137.5 | 775 | 9025 | ||||
| 2 | Improper wearing of Face Mask |
1664 | 415 | RESNET-50 | 36.67 | 800 | 3000 |
| MOBILENET | 41.33 | 820 | 3300 | ||||
| 3 | Classification of Face Mask |
2598 | 648 | CNN | 24.58 | 475 | 1950 |
| RESNET-50 | 39.25 | 645 | 3000 | ||||
| MOBILENET | 42.16 | 670 | 3200 | ||||
| 4 | Social Distance Detection |
4098 | 970 | RESNET-50 | 60.5 | 570 | 4200 |
| 3843 | 705 | MOBILENET | 65.16 | 590 | 4500 | ||
| 2598 | 648 | SOCIAL DISTANCING NET-19 |
58.83 | 570 | 4100 | ||
| 5 | Contact Tracing | 8450 | 2050 | DT | 112.83 | 430 | 7200 |
| 8450 | 2050 | RF | 112.83 | 430 | 7200 | ||
| 8450 | 2050 | LR | 112.83 | 430 | 7200 | ||
| 8450 | 2050 | SVM | 112.83 | 430 | 7200 | ||
| 2598 | 648 | VGG-16 | 25.67 | 460 | 2000 | ||
| 3843 | 705 | MOBILENET | 36.33 | 470 | 2650 | ||
| 4098 | 970 | RESNET-50 | 38.5 | 490 | 2800 |
| Sl. No |
Samples | k- Value |
Actual Distance (cm) (A) |
Distance from k-Value (cm) (B) |
% error between (A) & (C) |
Value Predicted by AI technique (cm) (C) |
Dimension | Pixel Size (mm) |
| 1 | 1 | 85.7 | 210 | 200 | 10.0 | 189 | 224 x 224 x 32 | 2.565 |
| 2 | 43.85 | 220 | 210 | 9.3 | 199.5 | 112 x 112 x 32 | 5.131 | |
| 3 | 44.54 | 195 | 185 | 9.9 | 175.7 | 256 x 256 x 64 | 4.49 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0.051 | 161 | 150 | 11.8 | 142 | 7 x 7 x 1280 | 3284 |
| 2 | 63.48 | 182 | 170 | 11.3 | 161.5 | 96 x 96 x 32 | 2.993 | |
| 3 | 91.31 | 200 | 185 | 12.0 | 176 | 256 x 256 x 32 | 2.245 | |
| 3 | 1 | 82.8 | 180 | 170 | 10.6 | 161 | 244 x 244 x 32 | 2.355 |
| 2 | 81.87 | 205 | 195 | 9.8 | 185 | 224 x 224 x 32 | 2.565 | |
| 3 | 97.99 | 210 | 200 | 10.0 | 189 | 512 x 512 x 64 | 2.245 |
| Sl. No | Classifier | Predicted | ||
| normal | Attack | |||
| 1 | Linear Regression (benchmark) |
normal | 32421 | 56 |
| attack | 145 | 22415 | ||
| 2 | VGG-16 (benchmark) |
normal | 32545 | 23864 |
| attack | 125 | 56 | ||
| 3 | MobileNetV2 | normal | 32572 | 48 |
| attack | 125 | 23864 | ||
| 4 | ResNet-50 | normal | 30071 | 2549 |
| attack | 119 | 23870 | ||
| Sl.No | Pre-trained Model |
Parameters | ||||
| Sensitivity (%) |
Precision (%) |
F-Measure (%) |
Specificity (%) |
Accuracy (%) |
||
| 1 | ResNet-50 | 90.66 | 74.26 | 75.73 | 97.07 | 90.07 |
| 2 | MobileNetV2 | 93.93 | 90.56 | 82.12 | 97.82 | 94.89 |
| 3 | VGG-16(benchmark) | 92.32 | 74.05 | 80.35 | 96.28 | 88.36 |
| Sl. No. |
Facemask Detection |
Proper Facemask wearing |
Classification of Facemask |
Social Distancing |
Text Description |
||||
| Y1 | N1 | Y2 | N2 | Y3 | N3 | Y4 | N4 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Null |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Social Distance Not Violated |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Social Distance Violated |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Null |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Not Proper Facemask |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Not Proper Face Mask Social Distance Not Violated |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | Not Proper Face Mask Social Distance Violated |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Null |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Proper Facemask |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Proper Facemask Social Distance Violated |
| Attributes | [6] | [7] | [46] | [47] | [59] | [60] | [67] | [64] | [80] | [81] | [82] | [83] | Proposed Method |
| Facemask Detection | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | Y |
| Proper Facemask wearing | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y |
| Classification of Facemask | N | N | Y | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | N | N | N | Y |
| Social Distancing | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | Y |
| Contact Tracing | Y | Y | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y |
| Cloud Computing | N | N | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Edge Computing | N | Y | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | Y |
| Text to Image converter | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y | Y | N | N | Y |
| Cyber Attack Detection | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).