Submitted:
15 August 2024
Posted:
20 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Theoretical Background
4. System Structure
- Primary wave (p waves)
- Secondary wave (s waves)
- R/L waves (Surface waves)
5. Information Gathering Sensors and Actuator Sensors
5.1. Receivers
5.2. Actuator Sensors
5.3. Receiver Sensor Position:
5.4. Validating input date
6. Information Transmission
7. Information Processing and Execute Command by Using Fuzzy Logic
7.1. Input Criteria
7.1.1. Gas Network
7.1.2. Electrical Network
- Distribution Circuits
- Electric boost station.
7.2. Output criteria
| Linguistic Variables | Define | range |
|---|---|---|
| R1 | Minor area | 0-6 |
| R2 | Moderate area | 8-14 |
| R3 | Major area | 16-22 |
| R4 | Complete area | 24-30 |
| Linguistic Variables | Define | range |
|---|---|---|
| R1 | Minor area | 0-8 |
| R2 | Moderate area | 10-16 |
| R3 | Major area | 18-24 |
| R4 | Complete area | 26-30 |
7.3. Case Study: Tehran City
7.4. Rules
7.5. Result
8. Conclusion
References
- Database, E.O.C.I.D. Total number of deaths as a result of natural disasters.; Université catholique de Louvain – Brussels – Belgium, 2019.
- mali, j.r. and m. s.kumbhar. Wireless sensor based Landslide Detection. may 2016, 7. [CrossRef]
- KATAYAMA, T. EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RISK MITIGATION BEFORE AND AFTER THE 1995 KOBE EARTHQUAKE. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2004.
- Manshoori, M.R. Evaluation of Seismic Vulnerability and Failure Modes for Pipelines. Procedia Engineering 2011, 14, 3042–3049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- {Hui}, L.Y.a.J.F.a.Y. Study on application modes of military Internet of Things (MIOT). 2012, 10.1109/CSAE.2012.6273031. [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.Z.L. Design and Research of Urban Intelligent Transportation System Based on the Internet of Things. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maglogiannis, C.D.I. Bringing IoT and Cloud Computing towards Pervasive Healthcare. 2012. [CrossRef]
- Atzori, L.; Iera, A.; Morabito, G. The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks 2010, 54, 2787–2805. [Google Scholar]
- Thoma, M., et al. On IoT-services: Survey, Classification and Enterprise Integration. in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications. 2012.
- Song, Z., A.A. Cardenas, and R. Masuoka. Semantic middleware for the Internet of Things. in 2010 Internet of Things (IOT). 2010.
- Jeretta Horn Norda, A.K. , ∗, Joanna Paliszkiewiczc, The Internet of Things: Review and theoretical framework. Expert Systems With Applications, 2019. 133: p. 97–108.
- Dai, J., S. Wang, and X. Yang. Computerized support systems for emergency decision making. Annals of Operations Research 1994, 51, 313–325. [CrossRef]
- Lee, E.K.; Maheshwary, S.; Mason, J.; Glisson, W. Decision support system for mass dispensing of medications for infectious disease outbreaks and bioterrorist attacks. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 148, 25–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duhamel, C.; Santos, A.C.; Brasil, D.; Châtelet, E.; Birregah, B. Connecting a population dynamic model with a multi-period location-allocation problem for post-disaster relief operations. Annals of Operations Research 2016, 247, 693–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- L.A.Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 1965, 8, 338–353.
- Hoda Nokhbatolfoghahaayee, M.B.M. , Masoud Shafiee. Fuzzy decision support system for crisis management with a new structure for decision making. Expert Systems with Applications 2010, 37, 3545–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoda Nokhbeh Foghahaayeea, M.B.M. , Hasan Montazer Torbatib. Fuzzy decision support software for crisis management in gas transmission networks. Applied Soft Computing 2014, 18, 82–90. [Google Scholar]
- Sßen, Z. Supervised fuzzy logic modeling for building earthquake hazard assessment. Expert Systems with Applications 2011, 38, 14564–14573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham Ahumada, A.A. , Ashraf Ayoub Fuzzy logic-based attenuation relationships of strong motion earthquake records. Expert Systems with Applications 2015, 42, 1287–1297. [Google Scholar]
- Arash Andalib, M.Z., Farid Atry. A Fuzzy Expert System for Earthquake Prediction,Case Study: The Zagros Range. In Third International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization, UAE.
- Dr Andrew Coburn, D.R.S. Front Matter. In Earthquake Protection, 2002; [CrossRef]
- H. Takaoka, H.H. H. Takaoka, H.H., S. Ikematsu & M. Hikida. Prediction Of Landslide-induced Debris Flow Hydrograph: The Atsumari Debris Flow Disaster In Japan. 2006. [CrossRef]
- Hoshiba, M.; Ozaki, T. Earthquake Early Warning and Tsunami Warning of the Japan Meteorological Agency, and Their Performance in the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake M9. In Early Warning for Geological Disasters: Scientific Methods and Current Practice, Wenzel, F., Zschau, J., Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014. pp. 1–28. [CrossRef]
- Hoshiba, M.; Iwakiri, K.; Hayashimoto, N.; Shimoyama, T.; Hirano, K.; Yamada, Y.; Ishigaki, Y.; Kikuta, H. Outline of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (Mw 9.0) —Earthquake Early Warning and observed seismic intensity—. Earth, Planets and Space 2011, 63, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdik, M.; Fahjan, Y.; Ozel, O.; Alcik, H.; Mert, A.; Gul, M. Istanbul Earthquake Rapid Response and the Early Warning System. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2003, 1, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fumio, Y. Seismic monitoring and early damage assessment systems in Japan. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 2001, 3, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeh, C.-H., C.-H. Loh, and K.-C. Tsai. Overview of Taiwan Earthquake Loss Estimation System. Natural Hazards 2006, 37, 23–37. [CrossRef]
- Bogazici University, D.o.E.E.I. ELER v3.1 2010.
- Özbey, C.; Sari, A.; Manuel, L.; Erdik, M.; Fahjan, Y. An empirical attenuation relationship for Northwestern Turkey ground motion using a random effects approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2004, 24, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strasser, S. , Bommer,Erdik. State-of-the-Art of European Earthquake Loss Estimation Software. 2008.
- Doi, K. The operation and performance of Earthquake Early Warnings by the Japan Meteorological Agency. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2011, 31, 119–126. [Google Scholar]
- Seng, C.-C.J.L.a.Z.-P. Development of the On-Site Earthquake Early Warning Systems for Taiwan Using Neural Networks. 2009. [CrossRef]
- USGS. ShakeAlert, early earthquake warning. 2012.
- Buzduga, A.G., C. Ciufudean and V. Vlad System for the detection earthquake victims construction and principle of operation. 2015.
- Dan Wang, Y.N. Wireless Sensor Networks for Earthquake Early Warning Systems of Railway Lines. 2012.
- Wang Yanwei, L.X., Wang Zifa,Shi Jianping,and Bao Enhe. Deep learning for P-wave arrival picking in earthquake early warning. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION 2021. [CrossRef]
- Rikhsieva, K.S.J.K.P.L.B. Strength of underground pipelines under seismic effects. Magazine of Civil Engineering 2020, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alphonsa, A.; Ravi, G. Earthquake early warning system by IOT using Wireless sensor networks. In Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), International Conference on. 2016; pp. 1201–1205.
- Liu, M.; Sun, X.H.; Yang, W.Y. Analysis and control of unsafe behavior. Environ. 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, Y.H. Misunderstandings and Countermeasures for the prevention of unsafe behavior. 2016.
- Aki, K., Richards, P. Quantitative Seismology, 2 University Science Books, Sausalito 2004.
- M. Mojarab, M.M.s., M Porois,N norozi,Z asadi. Feasibility study of Tehran earthquake rapid earthquake warning network design. Managing environmental hazards 2017, 4, 63–81.
- Schneider, E. “INTERNET OF THINGS” white paper. TECHNOLOGY, ECONOMIC VIEW AND TECHNICAL STANDARDIZATION 2018, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, M.; Miao, Y.; Hao, Y.; Hwang, K. Narrow Band Internet of Things. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 20557–20577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- U. Raza, P.K.a.M.S. Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 2017, 19, 855–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Federal Emergency Management Agency, W. Hazus EARTHQUAKE LOSS ESTIMATION METHODOLOGY; Federal Emergency Management Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2002.
- G. Lanzano a, E.S.b., *, F. Santucci de Magistris a, G. Fabbrocino a. Seismic vulnerability of gas and liquid buried pipelines. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 2014, 28, 72–78.
- Nations, U. The World’s Cities. United Nations 2016. [Google Scholar]
- standards, i.b.c.a. iranian code of practice for seismic resistant design of buildings standard 2800 v 4edition; iranian building codes and standards: iranian building codes and standards, 2015; Vol. 4, pp. 212.
- JICA, J.I.C.A.a.T.D.M.a.M.C. The study on seismic microzonation of the Greater Tehran Area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2000.

























| Technology | Frequency | Data Range | Transmission Range | Date rate (up and down link) |
Power Usage (energy Consumption ) |
Operating life (battery) | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2G/3G |
Cellular Bands |
10Mbps | 35 Km |
No limitation | High |
4-8hours 36 days(idle) |
High |
| Bluetooth 4 LE | 2.4Ghz | 24 Mbps | 50 m | No limitation | Low | Hours | Low |
| 802.15.4 | subGhz, 2.4GHz | 250 kbps | 200m | No limitation | Low | Up to 4 years | Low |
| LORA | SubGhz, 2.4GHz (868/915 MHz) |
More than 50kbps | 2-10km | EU:30bps-50kbps US:100-900 kbps |
Low | 10-20years(idle)/ 120 hours(communication)/ |
Medium |
| LTE Cat 0/1 | Cellular Bands | 1-10 Mbps | Several kilometers | Up to 1 MBPs | Medium | 2-3 hours (communication)/12days(idle) | High |
| NB-IoT | Cellular Bands (180KHZ) |
0.1-1 Mbps | 10-15km | 150kbps (NB) up to 1mbps | Medium | High | |
| SIGFOX | subGhz |
< 1 kbps |
Several kilometers |
4x8b/day (down) 100bps(up |
Low |
10-20years(idle)/ 120 hours(communication)/ |
Medium |
| WiMax | subGhz | 34 Mbps-1Gbps | 40km | No limitation | Low | hours | Low |
| WIFI | subGhz, 2.4Ghz, 5Ghz |
0.1-54Mbps | up to 10m | No limitation | Medium | 4-8hours 50 days(idle) |
Low |
| ZigBee | 2.4Ghz | 250 kbps | 10-500 m | No limitation | Low | Up to 2 years | Medium |
| Criteria Variable |
Low probability risk failures | Medium probability risk failures | High probability risk failures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gas Compressor Stations | Acceleration 0-0.238 | Acceleration 0.238-0.34 | Acceleration 0.34-1.0 |
| Gas Pipeline | Acceleration 0-0.406 | Acceleration 0.406-0.58 | Acceleration 0.58-1.0 |
| Distribution circuits electric | Acceleration 0-0.28 | Acceleration 0.28-0.4 | Acceleration 0.4-1.0 |
| Low voltage Substations | Acceleration 0-0.203 | Acceleration 0. 203-0.29 | Acceleration 0.29-1.0 |
| Name | Magnitude (Mw) | fault Length(km) |
| Mosha fault | 7.3 | 68 |
| North of Tehran fault(NTF) | 7.3 | 90 |
| Rey fault | 6.6 | 20 |
| Fault Name | Damage to gas pipeline Damage to compressor station |
Low | Medium | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rey | Low | R1 | R3 | R3 |
| Medium | R3 | R3 | R3 | |
| High | R3 | R3 | R4 | |
| NTF | Low | R1 | R3 | R3 |
| Medium | R3 | R3 | R3 | |
| High | R3 | R3 | R4 | |
| Mosha | Low | R1 | R2 | R3 |
| Medium | R2 | R2 | R3 | |
| High | R3 | R3 | R4 | |
| Undefined | Low | R1 | R2 | R3 |
| Medium | R2 | R3 | R3 | |
| High | R3 | R3 | R4 |
| Fault Name | Damage to electric network Damage to electric station |
Low | Medium | High |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rey | Low | R1 | R3 | R3 |
| Medium | R3 | R3 | R3 | |
| High | R3 | R3 | R4 | |
| NTF | Low | R1 | R3 | R3 |
| Medium | R3 | R3 | R3 | |
| High | R3 | R3 | R4 | |
| Mosha | Low | R1 | R2 | R3 |
| Medium | R2 | R2 | R3 | |
| High | R3 | R3 | R4 | |
| Undefined | Low | R1 | R2 | R3 |
| Medium | R2 | R3 | R3 | |
| High | R3 | R3 | R4 |
| Fault | Maximum PGA (G) [50] | Network | shot-down command by system |
Shot-down command by
[50] |
| Rey | 0.5 G | Gas | 19 km | 18 km |
| Rey | 0.5 G | Electric | 23 km | 20 km |
| NTF | 0.3 G | Gas | 13 km | 10 km |
| NTF | 0.3 G | Electric | 16 km | 12 km |
| Mosha | 0.1 G | Gas | 4 km | 2 km |
| Mosha | 0.1 G | Electric | 6 km | 0 km |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).