Submitted:
13 August 2024
Posted:
13 August 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Remote Sensing in Heritage
2.2. Detection of Deterioration
2.3. Data Classification
2.4. The Scan-to-HBIM Process
3. Methodological Process
3.1. Case Study
3.2. Architectural Survey Process
3.3. Data Organization and Classification
4. Results
4.1. Application of the Semantic Segmentation Process
4.2. Sectorization of Point Clouds in Construction Elements and Systems
4.3. Point Cloud Classification
- Segmentation of the column into three fundamental parts: base, shaft and capital. The shaft contains many undulations due to wear and loss of material, so it is important for the algorithm to detect these parts (which differ from walls and floors) and apply only to deformations. In this way, the capital and the base would also be discarded as they are groups outside the wall and floor type.
- Choice of tolerance parameters for classification: a minimum floor angle of 1º (minimum slope) and an angular tolerance for the walls (maximum angle with nadir-zenith line) with a high angle of 9º (1ºmin-10ºmax) as the column has a backward slump of 0.744º (Figure 10.(a).
- The slider for normal local smoothing is applied. This slider allows you to increase or decrease the radius of the buffer in a cloud, to account for a larger portion of the cloud. An intermediate of 0.013 m is chosen.
4.4. Analysis of Spinal Deformations
4.5. Parametric Modeling in the HBIM Project
4.6. Heritage Conservation Work
4.6.1. Management of Deterioration in the HBIM Project
4.6.2. Segmentation and Identification
4.6.3. Ontology. Semantic Classification.
4.6.4. Identification of Decay
4.6.5. Marking and Labelling of Deterioration (Decays)
4.6.6. Risk Assessment
4.6.7. Data Interoperability with Conservation Specialists
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Miceli, M. Morandotti, and S. Parrinello, “3D survey and semantic analysis for the documentation of built heritage. The case study of Palazzo Centrale of Pavia University,” VITRUVIO - International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 65, Jun. 2020. [CrossRef]
- J. Moyano, J. E. J. Moyano, J. E. Nieto-Julián, D. Bienvenido-Huertas, and D. Marín-García, “Validation of Close-Range Photogrammetry for Architectural and Archaeological Heritage: Analysis of Point Density and 3D Mesh Geometry,” Remote Sens (Basel), vol. 12, no. 21, p. 3571, Oct. 2020. [CrossRef]
- S. Spina, K. S. Spina, K. Debattista, K. Bugeja, and A. Chalmers, “Point Cloud Segmentation for Cultural Heritage Sites,” in VAST’11: Proceedings of the 12th International conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 2011, pp. 41–48.
- D. Costantino, M. D. Costantino, M. Pepe, and A. G. Restuccia, “Scan-to-HBIM for conservation and preservation of Cultural Heritage building: the case study of San Nicola in Montedoro church (Italy),” Applied Geomatics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 607–621, Sep. 2023. [CrossRef]
- G. Rocha, L. G. Rocha, L. Mateus, J. Fernández, and V. Ferreira, “A Scan-to-BIM Methodology Applied to Heritage Buildings,” Heritage, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–67, Feb. 2020. [CrossRef]
- A. R. M. de la Plata, P. A. C. A. R. M. de la Plata, P. A. C. Franco, J. C. Franco, and V. Gibello Bravo, “Protocol Development for Point Clouds, Triangulated Meshes and Parametric Model Acquisition and Integration in an HBIM Workflow for Change Control and Management in a UNESCO’s World Heritage Site,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 1083, Feb. 2021. [CrossRef]
- L. Alessandri, V. L. Alessandri, V. Baiocchi, S. Del Pizzo, M. F. Rolfo, and S. Troisi, “PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEY WITH FISHEYE LENS FOR THE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE LA SASSA CAVE,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-2/W9, pp. 25–32, Jan. 2019. [CrossRef]
- F. Di Stefano, E. S. F. Di Stefano, E. S. Malinverni, R. Pierdicca, G. Fangi, and S. Ejupi, “HBIM IMPLEMENTATION FOR AN OTTOMAN MOSQUE. CASE OF STUDY: SULTAN MEHMET FATIH II MOSQUE IN KOSOVO,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-2/W15, pp. 429–436, Aug. 2019. [CrossRef]
- J. Moyano, Á. Justo-Estebaranz, J. E. Nieto-Julián, A. O. Barrera, and M. Fernández-Alconchel, “Evaluation of records using terrestrial laser scanner in architectural heritage for information modeling in HBIM construction: The case study of the La Anunciación church (Seville),” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 62, p. 105190, Dec. 2022. [CrossRef]
- M. Á. Maté-González, V. M. Á. Maté-González, V. Di Pietra, and M. Piras, “Evaluation of Different LiDAR Technologies for the Documentation of Forgotten Cultural Heritage under Forest Environments,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 16, p. 6314, Aug. 2022. [CrossRef]
- J. J. Pérez, M. J. J. Pérez, M. Senderos, A. Casado, and I. Leon, “Field Work’s Optimization for the Digital Capture of Large University Campuses, Combining Various Techniques of Massive Point Capture,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 380, Mar. 2022. [CrossRef]
- L. Barazzetti, L. L. Barazzetti, L. Binda, M. Scaioni, and P. Taranto, “Photogrammetric survey of complex geometries with low-cost software: Application to the ‘G1′ temple in Myson, Vietnam,” J Cult Herit, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 253–262, Jul. 2011. [CrossRef]
- S. Herban, D. S. Herban, D. Costantino, V. S. Alfio, and M. Pepe, “Use of Low-Cost Spherical Cameras for the Digitisation of Cultural Heritage Structures into 3D Point Clouds,” J Imaging, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 13, Jan. 2022. [CrossRef]
- P. Grussenmeyer et al., “RECORDING APPROACH OF HERITAGE SITES BASED ON MERGING POINT CLOUDS FROM HIGH RESOLUTION PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XXXIX-B5, pp. 553–558, Jul. 2012. [CrossRef]
- A. Fryskowska and J. Stachelek, “A no-reference method of geometric content quality analysis of 3D models generated from laser scanning point clouds for hBIM,” J Cult Herit, vol. 34, pp. 95–108, Nov. 2018. [CrossRef]
- Mostafavi, M. Scaioni, and V. Yordanov, “PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SOLUTIONS FOR 3D MODELING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE SITES IN REMOTE AREAS,” The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLII-4/W18, pp. 765–772, Oct. 2019. [CrossRef]
- N. Yastikli, “Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning,” J Cult Herit, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 423–427, Sep. 2007. [CrossRef]
- M. Jaradat, H. M. Jaradat, H. Al Majali, C. Bendea, C. C. Bungau, and T. Bungau, “Enhancing Energy Efficiency in Buildings through PCM Integration: A Study across Different Climatic Regions,” Buildings, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 40, Dec. 2023. [CrossRef]
- R. A. Galantucci, A. R. A. Galantucci, A. Musicco, S. Bruno, and F. Fatiguso, “Automatic detection of dampness phenomena on architectural elements by point cloud segmentation.,” Rehabend 2020 Euro-American Congress-Construction Pathology, Rehabilitation Technology and Heritage Management, pp. 1141–1189, 2020.
- F. Rodrigues, V. F. Rodrigues, V. Cotella, H. Rodrigues, E. Rocha, F. Freitas, and R. Matos, “Application of Deep Learning Approach for the Classification of Buildings’ Degradation State in a BIM Methodology,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 7403, Jul. 2022. [CrossRef]
- F. Matrone and M. Martini, “Transfer learning and performance enhancement techniques for deep semantic segmentation of built heritage point clouds,” Virtual Archaeology Review, vol. 12, no. 25, p. 73, Jul. 2021. [CrossRef]
- I. , A. K. , B. C. , & R. H. Muñoz-Pandiella, “Towards Semi-Automatic Scaling Detection on Flat Stones,” 2017. [CrossRef]
- S.-H. Peng and H.-D. Nam, “A Robust Crack Filter Based on Local Gray Level Variation and Multiscale Analysis for Automatic Crack Detection in X-ray Images,” Journal of Electrical Engineering and Technology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1035–1041, Jul. 2016. [CrossRef]
- Sánchez and, E. Quirós, “Semiautomatic detection and classification of materials in historic buildings with low-cost photogrammetric equipment,” J Cult Herit, vol. 25, pp. 21–30, 17. 20 May. [CrossRef]
- X. Kong and R. G. Hucks, “Preserving our heritage: A photogrammetry-based digital twin framework for monitoring deteriorations of historic structures,” Autom Constr, vol. 152, p. 104928, Aug. 2023. [CrossRef]
- W. Boonpook, Y. W. Boonpook, Y. Tan, and B. Xu, “Deep learning-based multi-feature semantic segmentation in building extraction from images of UAV photogrammetry,” Int J Remote Sens, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Jan. 2021. [CrossRef]
- M. A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles, “Random sample consensus,” Commun ACM, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 381–395, Jun. 1981. [CrossRef]
- R. Raguram, J. M. R. Raguram, J. M. Frahm, and M. Pollefeys, “A comparative analysis of RANSAC techniques leading to adaptive real-time random sample consensus,” in Computer Vision – ECCV 2008: 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, -18, vol. Proceedings, Part II, Marseille, France: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 500–513. 12 October.
- Z. Dong, B. Z. Dong, B. Yang, P. Hu, and S. Scherer, “An efficient global energy optimization approach for robust 3D plane segmentation of point clouds,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 137, pp. 112–133, Mar. 2018. [CrossRef]
- A.-V. Vo, L. A.-V. Vo, L. Truong-Hong, D. F. Laefer, and M. Bertolotto, “Octree-based region growing for point cloud segmentation,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 104, pp. 88–100, Jun. 2015. [CrossRef]
- Kim, A. Habib, M. Pyeon, G. Kwon, J. Jung, and J. Heo, “Segmentation of Planar Surfaces from Laser Scanning Data Using the Magnitude of Normal Position Vector for Adaptive Neighborhoods,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 140, Jan. 2016. [CrossRef]
- Moyano, J. León, J. E. Nieto-Julián, and S. Bruno, “Semantic interpretation of architectural and archaeological geometries: Point cloud segmentation for HBIM parameterisation,” Autom Constr, vol. 130, p. 103856, Oct. 2021. [CrossRef]
- V. Croce, G. V. Croce, G. Caroti, L. De Luca, K. Jacquot, A. Piemonte, and P. Véron, “From the Semantic Point Cloud to Heritage-Building Information Modeling: A Semiautomatic Approach Exploiting Machine Learning,” Remote Sens (Basel), vol. 13, no. 3, p. 461, Jan. 2021. [CrossRef]
- Leica Cyclone 3DR (leica-geosystems.com), “Leica Cyclone 3DR (leica-geosystems.com),” 2024. Accessed: Aug. 03, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://shop.leica-geosystems.
- V. Tzedaki and J. M. Kamara, “Capturing As-Built Information for a BIM Environment Using 3D Laser Scanner: A Process Model,” in AEI 2013, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, Apr. 2013, pp. 486–495. [CrossRef]
- Radanovic, K. Khoshelham, and C. Fraser, “Geometric accuracy and semantic richness in heritage BIM: A review,” Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, vol. 19, p. e00166, Dec. 2020. [CrossRef]
- J. Liu, D. J. Liu, D. Xu, J. Hyyppa, and Y. Liang, “A Survey of Applications With Combined BIM and 3D Laser Scanning in the Life Cycle of Buildings,” IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, vol. 14, pp. 5627–5637, 2021. [CrossRef]
- J. Moyano, I. J. Moyano, I. Gil-Arizón, J. E. Nieto-Julián, and D. Marín-García, “Analysis and management of structural deformations through parametric models and HBIM workflow in architectural heritage,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 45, p. 103274, Jan. 2022. [CrossRef]
- J. Moyano, E. J. Moyano, E. Carreño, J. E. Nieto-Julián, I. Gil-Arizón, and S. Bruno, “Systematic approach to generate Historical Building Information Modelling (HBIM) in architectural restoration project,” Autom Constr, vol. 143, p. 104551, Nov. 2022. [CrossRef]
- Railway Innovation Hub, AEI. Agrupaciones Empresariales Innovadoras, M. y A. U. Ministerio de Transportes, and Adif. Administrador de Infraestructuras Ferroviarias, “BIM Railway Classification System SCFclass,” https://www.railwayinnovationhub.com/bim/.
- NBS Enterprises Ltd., “Uniclass - Unified Classification for the Construction Industry,” https://uniclass.thenbs.com/.



















| Section | Desv. Pr. (m) | D. mín. (m) | D. máx. (m) |
| Section 0.00 | -0,00653 | -0,01994 | 0,01553 |
| Section 0.15 | -0,00915 | -0,02205 | 0,00932 |
| Section 0.30 | -0,00600 | -0,02157 | 0,04881 |
| Section 0.45 | -0,00450 | -0,02339 | 0,03249 |
| Section 0.60 | -0,00589 | -0,02378 | 0,03059 |
| Section 0.75 | -0,00713 | -0,02487 | 0,01258 |
| Section 0.90 | -0,00825 | -0,02659 | 0,01728 |
| Section 1.05 | -0,01109 | -0,02765 | 0,00703 |
| Section 1.20 | -0,00924 | -0,05111 | 0,01171 |
| Section 1.35 | -0,00987 | -0,03155 | 0,01161 |
| Section 1.50 | -0,01105 | -0,04798 | 0,02569 |
| Section 1.65 | 0,00469 | -0,04241 | 0,03671 |
| Section 1.80 | -0,00850 | -0,03267 | 0,01419 |
| Section 1.95 | -0,01257 | -0,03231 | 0,00752 |
| Section 2.10 | -0,01141 | -0,03297 | 0,00917 |
| Section 2.25 | -0,01247 | -0,03458 | 0,00816 |
| Section 2.40 | -0,01242 | -0,03558 | 0,00757 |
| Section 2.55 | -0,01405 | -0,03712 | 0,00942 |
| Section 2.70 | -0,01369 | -0,03796 | 0,01120 |
| Section 2.85 | -0,01169 | -0,03915 | 0,01525 |
| Section 3.00 | -0,01383 | -0,04137 | 0,01250 |
| Section 3.15 | -0,00514 | -0,03706 | 0,02599 |
| Section 3.30 | -0,00977 | -0,03961 | 0,01360 |
| Section 3.45 | -0,01252 | -0,03274 | 0,01491 |
| Section | Desv. Pr. (m) | D. mín. (m) | D. máx.(m) |
| Section 3.60 | -0,01769 | -0,04245 | 0,01260 |
| Section 3.75 | -0,01568 | -0,04240 | 0,01317 |
| Section 3.90 | -0,01411 | -0,04274 | 0,01360 |
| Section 4.05 | -0,01457 | -0,04200 | 0,01447 |
| Section 4.20 | -0,01442 | -0,04138 | 0,01375 |
| Section 4.35 | -0,01391 | -0,04030 | 0,01342 |
| Section 4.50 | -0,01459 | -0,04045 | 0,01619 |
| Section 4.65 | -0,01557 | -0,04142 | 0,01712 |
| Section 4.80 | -0,01455 | -0,04007 | 0,01963 |
| Section 4.95 | -0,02316 | -0,04074 | 0,01991 |
| Section 5.10 | -0,00972 | -0,03993 | 0,02097 |
| Section 5.25 | -0,01144 | -0,03948 | 0,02201 |
| Section 5.40 | -0,00598 | -0,04435 | 0,09054 |
| Section 5.55 | -0,00173 | -0,07380 | 0,02808 |
| Section 5.70 | 0,00142 | -0,03929 | 0,03912 |
| Section 5.85 | -0,00186 | -0,05727 | 0,05121 |
| Section 6.00 | 0,00190 | -0,03662 | 0,03283 |
| Section 6.15 | -0,00675 | -0,03715 | 0,02814 |
| Section 6.30 | -0,00486 | -0,03500 | 0,03209 |
| Section 6.45 | -0,00518 | -0,03766 | 0,03320 |
| Section 6.60 | 0,00161 | -0,03850 | 0,04433 |
| Section 6.75 | -0,01300 | -0,03837 | 0,03851 |
| Section 6.90 | -0,00952 | -0,03936 | 0,03022 |
| Section 7.05 | -0,01761 | -0,04033 | 0,04967 |
| 05-SCP Risk Assessment Manager Column / Pilaster (pag.1) | ||||||||
| ID Risk (String) | ID Elemento BIM | Uniclass 2015 - October 2022 | Type Decay | Actitivity type | Activity class | Actitivity category | Risk Zone | Interactions (Option Set) |
| Ri-001.F1.PR019 | Mesh-Column-X4Y3 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack; Crack | Lack and missing part; Crack and fractur | Control/Inspection; Inspection | Visual | Partial element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| Ri-002.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X4Y2 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack; Crack | Lack and missing part | Control/Inspection; Inspection | Visual; Empirical | Whole element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X1Y4 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y2 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y3 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part; Crack and fractur | Control/Inspection; Inspection | Visual; Instrumental | Whole element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y4 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y5 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X4Y4 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X4Y5 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X5Y4 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element | With the horizontal support structure. |
| 05-SCP Risk Assessment Manager Column / Pilaster (pag.2) | ||||||||
| ID Risk (String) | ID Elemento BIM | Precautions | Validity from | Validity to | Construction Type (Option Set) | Technology (Option Set) | Class of Surface Material (Option Set) | Mortar |
| Ri-001.F1.PR019 | Mesh-Column-X4Y3 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Pilaster - stone masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| Ri-002.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X4Y2 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Column - stone masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X1Y4 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Pilaster - stone masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y2 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Column - stone masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y3 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Pilaster - stone masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y4 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Pilaster - brick masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y5 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Pilaster - stone masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X4Y4 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Pilaster - stone masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X4Y5 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Pilaster - stone masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X5Y4 | <?> | 25/07/2023 | Open | Pilaster - stone masonry structure | Technique - Traditional S. XII-XIII | Stone - Carbonate / Pietra Calcarea di Trani (roccia carbonatica) | Lime |
| ID Risk (String) | ID Elemento BIM | Uniclass 2015 - October 2022 | Type Decay (Option Set) | Actitivity type (Option Set) | Activity class (Option Set) | Actitivity category (Option Set) | Risk Zone (Option Set) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ri-001.F1.PR019 | Mesh-Column-X4Y3 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack; Crack | Lack and missing part; Crack and fractur | Control; Inspection | Visual | Partial element |
| Ri-002.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X4Y2 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack; Crack | Lack and missing part | Control; Inspection | Visual; Empirical | Whole element |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X1Y4 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y2 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y3 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part; Crack and fractur | Control; Inspection | Visual; Instrumental | Whole element |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y4 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X2Y5 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X4Y4 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X4Y5 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element |
| Ri-003.F1.PR019 | PCloud-Column-X5Y4 | Ss_20_30_75_50 Masonry column systems | Lack | Lack and missing part | Inspection | Visual | Partial element |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).