Submitted:
01 August 2024
Posted:
02 August 2024
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results & Discussion
3.1. Geographic Range and Occurrence in Armenia
3.2. Bio-Morphological Characteristics
3.3. Karyology
3.4. Pollen Fertility
3.5. Eco-Physiological Characteristics
3.6. Ornamental Properties
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mirzoeva, N.V.; Akhverdov, A.A. Ornamental herbaceous plants of the flora of Armenia. Bull. Bot. Garden Acad. Sci. Arm. SSR. 1959, 17, 89–109. [Google Scholar]
- Takhtajan, A.L.; Fedorov, An. A. Flora of Yerevan. Science, Leningrad: 1972; 372 p.
- Tamanyan, K.; Fayvush, G.; Nanagulyan, S.; Danielyan, T. (eds.). The Red Book of Plants of the Republic of Armenia. Higher Plants and Fungi. Second edition. Yerevan. 2010; 592 p.
- Convention on Biological Diversity. Global Strategy for Plant Conservation: 2011–2020; Botanic Gardens Conservation International: Richmond, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Heywood, V.H. The role of botanic gardens as resource and introduction centres in the face of global change. Biodivers. Conserv. 2011, 20, 221–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnan, S.; Novy, A. The role of botanic gardens in the twenty-first century. CABI Rev. (2016) 2017, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mounce, R.; Smith, P.; Brockington, S. Ex situ conservation of plant diversity in the world’s botanic gardens. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Akopian, J.A. Conservation of native plant diversity at the Yerevan Botanic Garden, Armenia. Kew Bulletin 2010, 65(4), 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akopian, J.; Hovakimyan, Zh.; Paravyan, Z. Bio-morphological features of some rare and endangered sandy and gypsy desert plant species of Armenia. Biological Journal of Armenia 2017, 3(69). 201, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
- Akopian, J. A. The exhibition of Flora and Vegetation of Armenia of the Yerevan Botanical Garden NAS RA – the principles of collection formation and modeling of phytocoenoses. Landscape architecture in botanical gardens and dendroparks. Materials of the XI international scientific conference 2019. Yerevan; pp. 46–53.
- Akopian, J.A.; Ghukasyan, A.G.; Elbakyan, A.H.; Martirosyan, L.Yu. Indigenous flora as a source of arid ornamental horticulture in Armenia. Yerevan. Gitutiun NAS RA. 2023. 213 p.
- Akhverdov, A.A.; Mirzoeva, N.V. Exposition of the Flora of Armenia plot in the Yerevan Botanical Garden of the Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR. Bull. Bot. Garden Acad. Sci. Arm. SSR. 1961, 18, 35–53. [Google Scholar]
- Hill, D.; Fasham, M.; Tucker G.; Shrewry M.; Shaw P. Handbook of biodiversity methods: survey, evaluation and monitoring. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 2005. 589 p.
- Beydeman, I.N. Methods of studying the phenology of plants and plant communities. Methodical instructions. 1974. The science. Novosibirsk. 155 p.
- Bylov, V.N. Fundamentals of Comparative Variety Evaluation of Ornamental Plants. Introduction and selection of ornamental plants. 1978. M. Pp. 7–32.
- Sheremetyev, S.N. Grasses on a soil moisture gradient. Partnership of scientific publications KMK, 2005. Moscow. 271 p.
- Salnikov, A. I.; Maslov, I. L. Physiology and biochemistry of plants: workshop. 2014. Perm, Publishing House of FGBOU VPO Perm State Agricultural Academy, 300 p.
- Mezhunts, B.Kh.; Navasardyan, M.A. Method for determining the content of chlorophylls a, b and carotenoids in plant leaf extracts. Patent for Invention. No. 2439 A., 2010. Yerevan.
- Pausheva, Z. P. Workshop on plant cytology. 1980. M., Kolos. 304 p.
- Dospekhov, B.A. Field experiment methodology. 1973. M. 336 p.
- Wolf, V. G. Statistical data processing. 1966. M. Kolos. 254 p.
- Tonyan, T.R. The chromosome number of some species of the genus Centaurea. Bioligical Journal of Armenia, 1968, 21, 8, 86-96.
- Tonyan, T.R. Correlation of some morphological features with ploidy in representatives of the subtribe Centaureinea Less. Biological Journal of Armenia, 1972, 25, 11, 86–96.
- Tonyan, T.R. The relationship between the number of chromosomes and some morphological characters in representatives of the subtribe Centaureinea Less. Biol. Journ. of Armenia, 1980, 33, 5, 522–554.
- Avetisian, E.M. & Tonyan, T.R. Palynomorphology and number of chromosomes of some of the species of the subtribe Centaureinae Less. In: Academy of Sciences of Armenia, ed. Palynology. 1975. Yerevan; pp. 45–49.
- Garcia-Jacas, N., Susanna, A. & Vilatersana, R. & Guara, M. New chromosome counts in the subtribe Centaureinea (Asteraceae, Cardueae) from west Asia, II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1998. 128, 403–412. [CrossRef]
- Gupta, R.C. & Gill, B.S. Compositae. 215 p. In: Löve A. (ed.). Chromosome number reports LXXI. Taxon, 1981, 30, 507–517.
- Gupta, R.C. & Gill, B.S. Cytopalynology of North and Central Indian Compositae. J. Cytol Genet. 1989, 24, 96–105. [Google Scholar]
- Moore, D.M. Index to plant chromosome numbers 1967-1971. Regnum Vegetable. 1973; 90 p.





| Elevation (m) |
Air temperature, 0C |
Air relative humidity, % | Soil humidity,% | Soil acidity | Lighting (Lx) |
| Semidesert zone, 1200 m | 29.9 | 34.4 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 3483 |
| Amberboa moschata samples, cultivated in the Yerevan Botanical Garden | Pollen grain size, μm | Pollen fertility percentage |
|
| Range | Average fertility, % |
||
| 61.4-63.2 | 92-100 | 96.7±0.9 | |
|
Amberboa moschata Herbarium (ERE) specimens from natural habitats |
Pollen grain size, μm | Pollen fertility percentage |
|
| Range | Average fertility, % |
||
| N 130754 | 62.4-67.1 | 93-100 | 96.0±2.2 |
| N 139664 | 60.2-62.8 | 96-100 | 97.8±0.7 |
| N 145154 | 59.8-61.6 | 95-100 | 98.2±1.1 |
| N 151800 | 59.4-62.4 | 95- 99 | 97.4±0.9 |
| N 153193 | 62.4-63.6 | 95-100 | 97.6±1.3 |
| N 202314 | 57.4-62.6 | 92-100 | 96.8±1.4 |
| N 161644 | 58.2-62.4 | 98-100 | 99.4±0.5 |
| N 182109 | 58.8-63.0 | 94-100 | 96.6±1.3 |
| N 202313 | 60.2-62.8 | 95- 99 | 95.8±1.6 |
| N 202334 | 60.3-64.5 | 95-100 | 98.1±1.2 |
| Plant species and habitat | Total water content,% | Water deficit, % | Intensity of transpiration, mg CO2 dm2/ hour | Photosynthetic productivity, mg/g wet weight, hour |
|
Amberboa moschata cultivated in the Yerevan Botanical Garden |
50.0±0.9 | 35.8±0.8 | 135.6±0.9 | 2.13±0.9 |
|
Amberboa moschata in the natural habitat of the “Erebuni” State Reserve |
48.0±1.0 | 37.8±0.8 | 130.4±0.9 | 2.03±0.8 |
| Optical density of chlorophyll “a”, λ 663 | 0.932±0.015 |
| Optical density of chlorophyll “b”, λ 645 | 0.847±0.001 |
| Optical density of carotenoids, λ 440.5 | 1.261±0.014 |
| Chlorophyll “a” content, per wet leaf (mg/g) | 22.308±0.4 |
| Chlorophyll “b” content, per wet leaf (mg/g) | 26.612±0.1 |
| Chlorophyll “a”+”b” | 48.920 |
| Chlorophyll “a”/“b” | 0.8 |
| Carotenoids content, per wet leaf (mg/g) | 6.85±0.27 |
| Sign of Decorativeness | Sign Value and Score (Points) | Feature Significance Coefficient | Number of Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Inflorescence color and stability | Color is bright, stable or slightly unstable (5) | 3 | 15 |
| Inflorescence shape | Large fringed basket (5) | 2 | 10 |
| Inflorescence size (diameter and height) | Diameter 5–7 cm, height from 3.5–4.5 cm (5) | 2 | 10 |
| Petal quality | Dense, retaining shape under adverse weather conditions (5) | 1 | 5 |
| Number of inflorescences on one generative shoot | Оne inflorescence (5) | 2 | 10 |
| Number of simultaneously open inflorescences on a plant | In the mass flowering phase about 70% (5) and more or about 50% (4) | 3 | 15 |
| Inflorescence density | Dense, compact (5) | 2 | 10 |
| Shoots strength | Not subject to deformation under the influence of external factors (5) | 2 | 10 |
| Shoots coloring | Bright (5) or middle bright (4) | 1 | 4 |
| Leaf color stability | Stable (5) or slightly unstable (4) | 2 | 8 |
| Durability of leaves decorativness | Most decorative during the phases of budding and flowering (5) | 1 | 5 |
| Fruit decorativness | Fruits slightly enhance the decorative effect (5) | 3 | 9 |
| General condition of plants during the flowering period | Presence or absence of breaks during flowering (5) | 2 | 10 |
| Plant originality | Habitus attractiveness (5) | 1 | 5 |
| Period of decorativness | From the phase of formed vegetative habit of the plant until the end of flowering (5) | 1 | 5 |
| Sum of points | 131 | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).