Submitted:
24 July 2024
Posted:
26 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participants
2.2. ECG Monitoring Device
2.3. Role of a Physician at the IoMT Monitoring Center
2.4. Empirical Research Scenarios
2.5. Follow-up Management of Participants Who Were Recommended to Visit a Hospital
2.6. Satisfaction Survey
3. Results
3.1. General Characteristics
3.2. Detection of Abnormal Signals and Recommendation to a Hospital through Participant ECG Monitoring
3.3. Observations of Participants Who Were Recommended to Visit a Hospital
3.4. Satisfaction Survey after Completion of Empirical Research
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization (2021). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds).
- Zarama, V.; Arango-Granados, M.C.; Manzano-Nunez, R.; Sheppard, J. P.; Roberts, N.; Plüddemann, A. The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac ultrasound for acute myocardial ischemia in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand. J. Trauma. Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2024, 32, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mincholé, A.; Rodriguez, B. Artificial intelligence for the electrocardiogram. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 22–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- American Heart Association. (2019). Using remote patient monitoring technologies for better cardiovascular disease outcomes: guidance. American Heart Association.
- Simovic, S.; Providencia, R.; Barra, S.; Kircanski, B.; Guerra, J.M.; Conte, G.; Duncker, D.; Marijon, E.; Anic, A.; Boveda, S. The use of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices during the COVID-19 pandemic: an EHRA physician survey. Europace. 2022, 24, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lupton, D. How does health feel? Towards research on the affective atmospheres of digital health. Digit. Health. 2017, 3, 2055207617701276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Awotunde, J. B., Ajagbe, S. A., & Florez, H. (2022, October). Internet of things with wearable devices and artificial intelligence for elderly uninterrupted healthcare monitoring systems. In International Conference on Applied Informatics (pp. 278-291). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Lee, H.Y.; Lee, K.H.; Lee, K.H.; Erdenbayar, U.; Hwang, S.; Lee, E. Y.; Lee, J. H.; Kim, H. J.; Park, S. B.; Park, J. W.; Chung, T. Y. , Kim, T. H.; Youk, H. Internet of medical things-based real-time digital health service for precision medicine: Empirical studies using MEDBIZ platform. Digit. Health. 2023, 9, 20552076221149659. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Barrett, P. M.; Komatireddy, R.; Haaser, S.; Topol, S.; Sheard, J.; Encinas, J.; Fought, A. J.; Topol, E. J. Comparison of 24-hour Holter Monitoring with 14-day Novel Adhesive Patch Electrocardiographic Monitoring. Am. J. Med. 2014, 127, 95.e11–95.e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, W. M.; Riddell, F.; Madon, M.; Gleva, M. J. Comparison of diagnostic value using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours. Am. Heart. J. 2017, 185, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lueken, M.; Gramlich, M.; Leonhardt, S.; Marx, N.; Zink, M. D. Automated signal quality assessment of single-lead ecg recordings for early detection of silent atrial fibrillation. Sens. 2023, 23, 5618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Venkataramanaiah, B.; Kamala, J. ECG signal processing and KNN classifier-based abnormality detection by VH-doctor for remote cardiac healthcare monitoring. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 17457–17466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suba, S.; Fleischmann, K. E.; Schell-Chaple, H.; Prasad, P.; Marcus, G. M.; Hu, X.; Pelter, M. M. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of premature ventricular complexes in community and hospital-based participants: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2021, 16, e0261712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Perez, M. V.; Mahaffey, K. W.; Hedlin, H.; Rumsfeld, J. S.; Garcia, A.; Ferris, T.; Balasubramanian, V.; Russo, A. M.; Rajmane, A.; Cheung, L.; Hung, G.; Lee, J.; Kowey, P.; Talati, N.; Gummidipundi, D. N. S. E.; Beatty, A.; Hills, M. T. H.; Desai, S.; Granger, C. B.; Desai, M.; Turakhia, M. P. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 381, 1909–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lubitz, S. A.; Faranesh, A. Z.; Atlas, S. J; McManus, D. D.; Singer, D. E.; Pagoto, S.; Pantelopoulos, A.; Foulkes, A. S. Rationale and design of a large population study to validate software for the assessment of atrial fibrillation from data acquired by a consumer tracker or smartwatch: the Fitbit heart study. Am. Heart J. 2021, 238, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mwachiro, D. M.; Baron-Lee, J.; Kates, F. R. Impact of post-discharge follow-up calls on 30-day hospital Readmissions in Neurosurgery. Glob. J. Qual. Saf. Healthc. 2019, 2, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, P. Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration. Trials. 2010, 11, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]


| Variables | Participants (Hikers) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n=2,000) | Male (n=811) | Female (n=1,189) | |
| Age (mean±S.D) | 49.36±14.65 | 49.35±15.81 | 49.37±13.81 |
| Age group (n, %) | |||
| Under 20 | 51 (2.55%) | 22 (2.71%) | 29 (2.43%) |
| 20s | 248 (12.40%) | 118 (14.54%) | 130 (10.93%) |
| 30s | 266 (13.30%) | 105 (12.94%) | 161 (13.54%) |
| 40s | 353 (17.65%) | 133 (16.39%) | 220 (18.50%) |
| 50s | 561 (28.05%) | 188 (23.18%) | 373 (31.37%) |
| 60s | 428 (21.40%) | 187 (23.05%) | 241 (20.26%) |
| More than 70 | 93 (4.65%) | 58 (7.15%) | 35 (2.94%) |
| Height (cm) | 164.16±8.65 | 171.35±7.14 | 159.26±5.63 |
| Weight (kg) | 64.26±11.80 | 73.04±10.97 | 58.26±7.98 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 130.89±17.12 | 136.85±14.36 | 126.82±17.65 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 85.61±10.59 | 88.79±10.43 | 83.44±10.15 |
| PR (bpm) | 74.87±22.94 | 76.05±33.77 | 74.07±10.30 |
| Temperature (℃) | 36.72±10.32 | 36.79±11.49 | 36.67±9.44 |
| Chronic disease (n, %) | |||
| None | 1,325 (66.25%) | 518 (63.87%) | 807 (67.87%) |
| One | 422 (21.10%) | 183 (22.57%) | 239 (20.10%) |
| Two | 187 (9.35%) | 77 (9.49%) | 110 (9.25%) |
| More than three | 66 (3.30%) | 33 (4.07%) | 33 (2.78%) |
| Family history (n, %) | |||
| Yes | 906 (45.30%) | 297 (36.62%) | 609 (51.22%) |
| No | 1,094 (54.70%) | 514 (63.38%) | 580 (48.78%) |
| Trials | Participants | Abnormal signals | Recommendation to visit a hospital | Details about CD (n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | CD | ||||
| 1 | 21 | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | 10 | - | - | - | - |
| 3 | 25 | 3 | 3 | 2 | AF (1), SA (1) |
| 4 | 44 | 1 | 1 | 1 | PVC (1) |
| 5 | 58 | 4 | 2 | 1 | Arrhythmia (1) |
| 6 | 59 | 5 | 5 | 3 | AF (2), Tachycardia (1) |
| 7 | 37 | 13 | 11 | 2 | Arrhythmia (1), Bradycardia (1) |
| 8 | 65 | 8 | 7 | 5 | Arrhythmia (2), SA block (1), PAC (1), BBB (1) |
| 9 | 46 | 15 | 15 | 4 | AV block (2), Tachycardia (1), Bradycardia (1) |
| 10 | 26 | 6 | 4 | 1 | Tachycardia (1) |
| 11 | 8 | - | - | - | - |
| 12 | 141 | 25 | 22 | 2 | Arrhythmia (1), Tachycardia (1) |
| 13 | 144 | 40 | 36 | 21 | PVC (7), Arrhythmia (4), Tachycardia (3), AF (2), PAC (1), Chest pain (2), Palpitations (1), Abnormal rhythms (1) |
| 14 | 48 | 9 | 8 | 4 | PVC (2), Arrhythmia (2) |
| 15 | 48 | 9 | 7 | 3 | AF (1), Arrhythmia (1), PVC (1) |
| 16 | 48 | 5 | 5 | 4 | PVC (2), VF (1), BBB (1) |
| 17 | 48 | 10 | 10 | 9 | Arrhythmia (3), Bradycardia (2), AF (1), PVC (1) BBB (1), ST depression (1) |
| 18 | 144 | 23 | 23 | 17 | PVC (9), BBB (5), AF (2), Tachycardia (1) |
| 19 | 144 | 16 | 16 | 14 | PVC (10), Arrhythmia (2), BBB (1), Sinus arrhythmia (1) |
| 20 | 48 | 10 | 10 | 7 | BBB (3), Arrhythmia (2), PVC (1), PAC (1) |
| 21 | 48 | 9 | 9 | 5 | Arrhythmia (3), AF (1), PVC (1) |
| 22 | 82 | 17 | 15 | 7 | PVC (6), BBB (1) |
| 23 | 72 | 10 | 9 | 6 | Arrhythmia (3), PVC (2), BBB (1) |
| 24 | 72 | 8 | 8 | 6 | PAC (2), PVC (1), Arrhythmia (1), AF (1), Abnormal rhythms (1) |
| 25 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 7 | PVC (5), AF (1), PAC (1) |
| 26 | 72 | 13 | 13 | 12 | PVC (8), BBB (2), Arrhythmia (1), Tachycardia (1) |
| 27 | 168 | 22 | 22 | 22 | PVC (15), PAC (5), Arrhythmia (1), Tachycardia (1) |
| 28 | 48 | 4 | 4 | 3 | BBB (3) |
| 29 | 48 | 9 | 9 | 5 | PVC (2), Arrhythmia (2), PAC (1) |
| 30 | 130 | 12 | 10 | 9 | PVC (5), Arrhythmia (3), Tachycardia (1) |
| Total | 2,000 | 318 | 296 | 182 | |
| Variables | Number of patients |
|---|---|
| Diagnosis method (n, %) | |
| EKG | 17 (56.67) |
| EKG & Ultrasound | 6 (20.00) |
| Ultrasound | 5 (16.67) |
| EKG & X-ray | 1 (3.33) |
| General treatment | 1 (3.33) |
| Timing of hospital visits (n, %) | |
| Within one month | 24 (80.00) |
| After one month | 6 (20.00) |
| Diagnosis results (n, %) | |
| Progress observation | 2 (6.67) |
| Stent procedure | 1 (3.33) |
| Arrhythmia | 1 (3.33) |
| AF & Arrhythmia | 1 (3.33) |
| Heart medication prescription | 1 (3.33) |
| Panic disorder | 1 (3.33) |
| No abnormality | 23 (76.68) |
| Questions | Values | |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution (n, %) | Score (mean±S.D) | |
| Have you previously participated in any clinical studies? | ||
| Yes | 117 (5.85) | - |
| No | 1,883 (94.15) | |
| Was the health information provided helpful? (e.g., ECG, heart rate, respiration, body temperature) | ||
| Yes | 1,931 (96.55) | - |
| No | 69 (3.45) | |
| Do you believe that the devices used will be helpful for health management? | ||
| Yes | 1,959 (97.95) | - |
| No | 41 (2.05) | |
| Did you feel any discomfort after attaching the device? (e.g., detachment, itchiness, restriction of movement) | ||
| Very Satisfied (1) | 802 (40.10) | 2.02±1.35 |
| Satisfied (2) | 485 (24.25) | |
| Neutral (3) | 39 (1.95) | |
| Dissatisfied (4) | 123 (6.15) | |
| Very Dissatisfied (5) | 187 (9.35) | |
| Do you trust the health information provided? (e.g., ECG, heart rate, respiration, body temperature) | ||
| Very Satisfied (5) | 700 (35.00) | 3.87±1.20 |
| Satisfied (4) | 810 (40.50) | |
| Neutral (3) | 174 (8.70) | |
| Dissatisfied (2) | 161 (8.05) | |
| Very Dissatisfied (1) | 155 (7.75) | |
| Are you interested in using the HiCardi (attached device) in the future? | ||
| Very Satisfied (5) | 328 (16.40) | 3.53±1.13 |
| Satisfied (4) | 636 (31.80) | |
| Neutral (3) | 362 (18.10) | |
| Dissatisfied (2) | 205 (10.25) | |
| Very Dissatisfied (1) | 105 (5.25) | |
| Is it easy to access health information through the mobile application? (e.g., ECG, heart rate, respiration, body temperature) | ||
| Very Satisfied (5) | 673 (33.65) | 3.88±1.15 |
| Satisfied (4) | 846 (42.30) | |
| Neutral (3) | 187 (9.35) | |
| Dissatisfied (2) | 163 (8.15) | |
| Very Dissatisfied (1) | 131 (6.55) | |
| How satisfied are you with this empirical research? | ||
| Very Satisfied (5) | 813 (40.65) | 3.98±1.17 |
| Satisfied (4) | 760 (38.00) | |
| Neutral (3) | 164 (8.20) | |
| Dissatisfied (2) | 117 (5.85) | |
| Very Dissatisfied (1) | 146 (7.30) | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).