Submitted:
02 July 2024
Posted:
04 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Geometry
3. Domain Analysis of Turbines
4. CFD Simulation and Approach
5. Mesh Quality of Geometries
6. Time Independence Study
7. Validation of CFD Modeling
8. CFD Simulation Configurations
9. Total Moment and Power Generation
10. Neural-Fuzzy Design
11. Configuration Coordinate Optimization
11.1. Artificial Bee Colony Optimizer
11.2. Fireflies Algorithms
11.3. Grasshoppers Optimization Algorithms
11.4. Whales Optimization Algorithms
11.5. Developed Oblique Configuration
11.6. Mesh Quality of Oblique Configuration
12. Results and Discussion
13. Conclusions
References
- Li, Y.; Tong, G.; Zhao, B.; Feng, F.; Tagawa, K. Study on Aerodynamic Performance of a Straight-Bladed VAWT Using a Wind-Gathering Device With Polyline Hexagonal Pyramid Shape. Front. Energy Res. 2022, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porté-Agel, F.; Bastankhah, M.; Shamsoddin, S. Wind-Turbine and Wind-Farm Flows: A Review. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 2020, 174, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.; Liu, P.; Xu, H.; Chen, L.; Yang, M.; Yang, L. A detailed investigation of a novel vertical axis Darrieus wind rotor with two sets of blades. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2017, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butt, A.H.; Akbar, B.; Aslam, J.; Akram, N.; Soudagar, M.E.M.; Márquez, F.P.G.; Younis, Y.; Uddin, E. Development of a Linear Acoustic Array for Aero-Acoustic Quantification of Camber-Bladed Vertical Axis Wind Turbine. Sensors 2020, 20, 5954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuang, L.; Su, J.; Chen, Y.; Han, Z.; Zhou, D.; Zhang, K.; Zhao, Y.; Bao, Y. Wind-capture-accelerate device for performance improvement of vertical-axis wind turbines: External diffuser system. Energy 2021, 239, 122196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, Q. Aerodynamic noise prediction and reduction of H-Darrieus vertical axis wind turbine. Aust. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 21, 1093–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Shahzad, A.; Qadri, M.N.M. An overview of aerodynamic performance analysis of vertical axis wind turbines. Energy Environ. 2022, 34, 2815–2857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moon, H.; Jeong, J.; Park, S.; Ha, K.; Jeong, J.-H. Numerical and experimental validation of vortex generator effect on power performance improvement in MW-class wind turbine blade. Renew. Energy 2023, 212, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Bashir, M.; Miao, W.; Liu, Q.; Li, C.; Yue, M.; Wang, P. Aerodynamic analysis of a novel pitch control strategy and parameter combination for vertical axis wind turbines. Renew. Energy 2023, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.-H.; Wang, J.-S.; Chang, M.-H.; Hoang, A.T.; Lam, S.S.; Kwon, E.E.; Ashokkumar, V. Optimization of a vertical axis wind turbine with a deflector under unsteady wind conditions via Taguchi and neural network applications. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 254, 115209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sahebzadeh, S.; Rezaeiha, A.; Montazeri, H. Vertical-axis wind-turbine farm design: Impact of rotor setting and relative arrangement on aerodynamic performance of double rotor arrays. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 5793–5819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghiasi, P.; Najafi, G.; Ghobadian, B.; Jafari, A.; Mazlan, M. Analytical Study of the Impact of Solidity, Chord Length, Number of Blades, Aspect Ratio and Airfoil Type on H-Rotor Darrieus Wind Turbine Performance at Low Reynolds Number. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TOKUL, A.; Unal, K. Comparative performance analysis of NACA 2414 and NACA 6409 airfoils for horizontal axis small wind turbine. International Journal of Energy Studies 2023, 8, 879–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alber, J.; Manolesos, M.; Weinzierl-Dlugosch, G.; Fischer, J.; Schönmeier, A.; Nayeri, C.N.; Paschereit, C.O.; Twele, J.; Fortmann, J.; Melani, P.F.; et al. Experimental investigation of mini Gurney flaps in combination with vortex generators for improved wind turbine blade performance. Wind. Energy Sci. 2022, 7, 943–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özden, M.; Genç, M.S.; Koca, K. Passive Flow Control Application Using Single and Double Vortex Generator on S809 Wind Turbine Airfoil. Energies 2023, 16, 5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLaren, K.W. A numerical and experimental study of unsteady loading of high solidity vertical axis wind turbines. 2011.
- Sheldahl, R.E.; Klimas, P.C. Aerodynamic characteristics of seven symmetrical airfoil sections through 180-degree angle of attack for use in aerodynamic analysis of vertical axis wind turbines. 1981, Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA).
- Sahebzadeh, S.; Rezaeiha, A.; Montazeri, H. Towards optimal layout design of vertical-axis wind-turbine farms: Double rotor arrangements. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 226, 113527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shyu, L.S. A Pilot Study of Vertical-Axis Turbine Wind Farm Layout Planning. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 953-954, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cazzaro, D.; Bedon, G.; Pisinger, D. Vertical Axis Wind Turbine Layout Optimization. Energies 2023, 16, 2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karaboga, D. Artificial bee colony algorithm. scholarpedia 2010, 5, 6915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IztokFister, I.F., Jr.; Yang, X.-S.; Brest, J. A comprehensive review of firefly algorithms. Swarm Evolut. Comput. 2013, 13, 34–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saremi, S.; Mirjalili, S.; Lewis, A. Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm: Theory and application. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2017, 105, 30–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirjalili, S.; Lewis, A. The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in engineering software 2016, 95, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castelli, M.R.; Englaro, A.; Benini, E. The Darrieus wind turbine: Proposal for a new performance prediction model based on CFD. Energy 2011, 36, 4919–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]




















| No. | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turbine Diameter D (mm) | 655 |
| 2 | Blade length (mm) | 106 |
| 3 | Twist angle [degree] | 60 |
| 4 | Number of turbine blades | 3 |
| 5 | Airfoil name | NACA 4412[13] |
| Config. No. | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1894.32 | 1027.04 | 1894.32 | 1997.14 | 2403.71 | 1486.87 | 2881 | 1997.14 | 2881 | 1027.04 | 104 |
| 2 | 1562.1 | 1551 | 2053 | 1065 | 2053 | 2028 | 2621 | 2478 | 2621 | 665 | 146.8 |
| 3 | 1728.1 | 2585 | 1728.1 | 1874 | 1728.1 | 1152.2 | 2471 | 1152.2 | 3182 | 1152.2 | 109.2 |
| 4 | 2329 | 982 | 2624 | 1531 | 2921 | 2064 | 3688 | 2597 | 4132 | 3141 | 164.2 |
| 5 | 1767 | 2625 | 1767 | 1818 | 1767 | 1014 | 2596 | 1803 | 3198 | 2609 | 120.1 |
| Optimizers | Result | Enhancement percent |
|---|---|---|
| ABC | 184.1 | 11.98% |
| WOA | 181.6 | 10.46% |
| GOA | 179.4 | 9.11% |
| FA | 183.1 | 11.37% |
| Optimizer | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABC | 1901.52 | 1034.12 | 2228.51 | 1361.25 | 2555.18 | 1688.21 | 2775.2 | 2882.22 | 3209.12 | 2342.57 | 184.1 |
| Meta-heuristic optimizers and neural-fuzzy result | Computational Fluid Dynamics result | Error (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (watt/s) | 184.1 | 179.21 | 0.08582292 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).