Submitted:
28 June 2024
Posted:
29 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Test Set Up
2.2. Contents in the Substrates and Its Measurement
2.2.1. Moisture Content
2.2.2. Total Solids
2.2.3. Volatile Solids
2.2.4. Carbon Content
2.2.5. Nitrogen Content
2.2.6. pH
2.2.7. Volatile Fatty Acids
2.2.8. Methane Yield
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. pH
3.2. Volatile Fatty Acids
3.3. C/N Ratio
3.4. Methane Procuction
3.3. Volatile Solid Reduction
4. Organic Manure Content
4.1. Total Organic Carbon
4.2. Kjeldahl Nitrogen
4.3. Phosphorous
4.4. Potassium
Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Habib, S.S.; Torii, S. Biogas as Alternative to Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Mauritania: An Integrated Future Approach for Energy Sustainability and Socio-Economic Development, Clean Technologies. 2024, 6, 453–470.
- Leong, S.T.; Muttamara, S.; Laortanakul, P. Reutilization of wastewater in a rubber-based processing factory: A case study in southern thailand. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2003, 37, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rungruang, N.; Babel, S. Treatment of natural rubber processing wastewater by combination of ozonation and activated sludge process. In: International Conference on Environmental Research and Technology (ICERT 2008), Parkroyal Penang, Malaysia. 2008,259- 26.
- Nhu Hien, N.; Van Tuan, D.; Nhat, P.T.; Thi Thanh Van, T.; Van Tam, N.; Xuan Que, V.O.N.; Phuoc Dan, N. Application of oxygen limited autotrophic nitritation/denitrification (Oland) for anaerobic latex processing wastewater treatment. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2017, 124, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asia, I.O.; Akporhonor, E.E. Characterization and Physicochemical treatment of Wastewater from Rubber processing factory. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2007, 2, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
- Chua, E.T.; Garces, L.R. Waste Management in the Coastal Areas of the ASEAN Region: roles of governments, banking institutions, donor agencies, private sector and communities. World Fish Center. 1992,117-126.
- Hutagalung, R.L. Use of carbohydrate residues in Malaysia. 2003, Department of Animal Sciences, University Pertanian Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
- Tekasakul, P.; Tekasakul, S. Environmental problems related to natural rubber production in Thailand. Aerosol. Res. 2006, 21, 21,122–129. [Google Scholar]
- Tanikawa, D.; Kataoka, T.; Sonaka, H.; Hirakata, Y.; Hatamoto, M.; Yamaguchi, T. Evaluation of key factors for residual rubber coagulation in natural rubber processing wastewater. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 33, 101041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watari, T.; Thao, P.T.; Hirakata, Y.; Hatamoto, M.; Tanikawa, D.; Syutsubo, K.; Huong, N.L.; Tan, N.M.; Fukuda, M.; Yamaguchi, T. Process performance and microbial community structure of an anaerobic baffled reactor for natural rubber processing wastewater treatment. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 2017, 245–252.
- Brooks, A.; Iyakndue, M.; Unimke, A.; Agbo, B. Rubber effluent bio-analyses and its impacts on the microbial community structure of the soil in Calabar, Nigeria. Asian J. Environ. & Ecol. 2017, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Warren-Thomas, E.; Dolman, P.M.; Edwards, D.P. Increasing demand for natural rubber necessitates a robust sustainability initiative to mitigate impacts on tropical biodiversity. Conserv. Lett. 2015, 8, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arimoro, F.O. Impact of rubber effluent discharges on the water quality and macroinvertebrate community assemblages in a forest stream in the Niger Delta. Chemosphere 2009, 77, 440–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jawjit, S.; Liengcharernsit, W. Anaerobic treatment of concentrated latex processing wastewater in two-stage upflow anaerobic sludge Blanketa paper submitted to the Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2010, 37, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez-Hernandez, E.; Hernandez, J.E. Conceptualization, modeling and environmental impact assessment of a natural rubber techno-ecological system with nutrient, water and energy integration. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 185, 707–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atagana, H.I.; Ejechi, B.O.; Ogodu, M.I. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 1999, 59, 145–154.
- Tran, P.T.; Watari, T.; Hirakata, Y.; Nguyen, T.T.; Hatamoto, M.; Tanikawa, D.; Syutsubo, K.; Nguyen, M.T.; Fukuda, M.; Nguyen, L.H.; Yamaguchi, T. Anaerobic baffled reactor in treatment of natural rubber processing wastewater: Reactor performance and analysis of Microbial Community. J. Water Environ. Technol. 2017, 15, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nallathambi Gunaseelan, V. Anaerobic digestion of Gliricidia leaves for biogas and organic manure. Biomass 1988, 17, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- American Public Health Association (APHA),Standard Method for Examination of Water and Wastewater/American Water Works Association/Water Environmental Federation,1999, Washington DC.
- Hernández-Berriel, Ma. C.; Márquez-Benavides, L.; González-Pérez, D.J.; Buenrostro-Delgado, O. The effect of moisture regimes on the anaerobic degradation of municipal solid waste from Metepec (México). Waste Management 2008, 28.
- Liu, C.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Si, D.; Chen, Q. Evolution of microbial community along with increasing solid concentration during high-solids anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 216, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahring, B.K.; Ibrahim, A.A.; Mladenovska, Z. Effect of temperature increase from 55 to 65°C on performance and microbial population dynamics of an anaerobic reactor treating cattle manure. Water Res. 2001, 35, 2446–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mata-Alvarez, J.; Macé, S.; Llabrés, P. Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Solid Wastes. an Overview of Research Achievements and Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalid, A.; Arshad, M.; Anjum, M.; Mahmood, T.; Dawson, L. The Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Organic Waste. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 1737–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ward, A.J.; Hobbs, P.J.; Holliman, P.J.; Jones, D.L. Optimisation of the Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural Resources. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7928–7940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, Y.; Bian, A.; Zhang, L.; Chen, T.; Pan, M.; He, L.; Wang, A.; Ding, C. A combined process for efficient biomethane production from corn straw and cattle manure: Optimizing C/N ratio of mixed hydrolysates. BioResources 2019, 14, 1347–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidi Habib, S.; Torii, S.; S, K.; C. A., A. Optimization of the factors affecting biogas production using Taguchi design of Experiment Method 2024.
- Siegert, I.; Banks, C. The effect of volatile fatty acid additions on the anaerobic digestion of cellulose and glucose in batch reactors. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 3412–3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahring, B.K.; Westermann, P. Product inhibition of butyrate metabolism by acetate and hydrogen in a thermophilic Coculture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988, 54, 2393–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fukuzaki, S.; Nishio, N.; Shobayashi, M.; Nagai, S. Inhibition of the fermentation of propionate to methane by hydrogen, acetate, and propionate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56, 719–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van den Heuvel, J.C.; Verschuren, P.G.; Beeftink, H.H.; de Beer, D. Determination of the critical concentration of inhibitory products in a repeated fed-batch culture. Biotechnol. Tech. 1992, 6, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hills, D.J. Effects of Carbon: Nitrogen Ratio on Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure. Agric. Wastes 1979, 1, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MATHERI, A.N.; NTULI, F.; BELAID, M.; SEODIGENG, T.; NGILA, J.C. Modified gompertz model of biogas production from co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste. IAENG Transactions on Engineering Sciences 2017.
- Zhang, C.; Su, H.; Baeyens, J.; Tan, T. Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 38, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schroeder, J.I.; Delhaize, E.; Frommer, W.B.; Guerinot, M.L.; Harrison, M.J.; Herrera-Estrella, L.; Horie, T.; Kochian, L.V.; Munns, R.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Tsay, Y.-F.; Sanders, D. Using membrane transporters to improve crops for sustainable food production. Nature 2013, 497, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, S.; Kaldenhoff, R.; Uehlein, N.; Sattelmacher, B.; Brueck, H. Relationship between water and nitrogen uptake in nitrate- and ammonium-supplied phaseolus vulgaris L. plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2007, 170, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Parameters | Inoculum | RPE | Gliricidia leaves |
| Total solids (%) | 6.65±0.05 | 1.1 ± 0.02 | 28±2.3 |
| Volatile solids (%) | 4±0.5 | 0.2356±0.02 | 25±0.4 |
| pH | 8.1±1.4 | 6.6±1.2 | 6.3±1.2 |
| Moisture content (%) | 94±0.4 | - | 74±0.3 |
| Total organic carbon (%) | 28±0.22 | 0.73±0.004 | 32.15±1.4 |
| Potassium | 0.43±0.02 | 0.016±0.001 | 1.35±0.14 |
| Phosphorous | 0.91±0.01 | 0.021±0.002 | 0.52±0.13 |
| Kjeldahl Nitrogen | 1.69±0.13 | 0.01±0.001 | 2.25±0.12 |
| C/ N ratio | 16±1.4 | 17±1.32 | 14±1.22 |
| Experiment | Average methane yield (Liters) |
Average pH | Average volatile solid reduction (%) | Average Volatile Fatty acids (mg/L) |
| T1 | 0.98 | 8 | 14.2 | 632 |
| T2 | 3.2 | 8.2 | 25.4 | 875 |
| T3 | 9.21 | 7.4 | 12.1 | 3400 |
| T4 | 4.32 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 7012.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).