Submitted:
17 June 2024
Posted:
18 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Study Area
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Data
3.2. Least Cost Path (LCP) Analysis
3.3. Create a Walkability Index
3.3.1. Create a Distance Raster
3.3.2. Rank the Distance
3.3.3. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
3.3.4. Weight the Criteria
3.3.5. Checking the Consistency
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
7. Future Recommendations
- a)
- The future research can conduct comparative studies across multiple Saudi Arabian locales or similar contexts. This can provide insights into the similarities and differences in walkability factors and their relative importance in different regions. Comparative studies can help identify common patterns and robust findings that can guide urban planning efforts on a broader scale.
- b)
- Assess the impact of interventions: It would be valuable to conduct longitudinal studies that evaluate the impact of specific interventions aimed at enhancing walkability. By implementing targeted interventions such as infrastructure improvements, pedestrian-friendly policies, or community engagement initiatives, researchers can measure the effectiveness of these interventions in improving walkability. This can provide evidence-based recommendations for future urban planning and policy initiatives.
- c)
- Integrate emerging technologies: With the rapid advancement of technology, future research can explore the integration of emerging technologies such as augmented reality, mobile applications, and smart city solutions in assessing and enhancing walkability. These technologies can provide real-time data, interactive mapping tools, and personalized recommendations to improve the pedestrian experience and promote sustainable mobility.
8. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Al-Balawi, A. Z., & Al-Qadi, M. I. (2020). Vision 2030 and the transformation of Saudi Arabian cities: From car-centric to sustainable development. Land Use Policy, 99, 105102.
- Al-Mulhim, H. (2019). Sustainable urban development in Saudi Arabia: Vision 2030 and beyond. Sustainability, 11(13), 3636.
- Al-Ansi, S., & Habib, R. (2022). Walkability and public health in emerging cities: A case study of Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 99(3), 544-553.
- Al-Hazim, Y., & Aldwoah, M. (2021). The relationship between walkability and physical activity among adults in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 31(1), 102112.
- Al-Kodmany, O., & Al-Qadi, M. I. (2018). Developing a walkability assessment framework for sustainable urban communities in Saudi Arabia. Habitat International, 84, 185-196.
- Rezaei, M., Rakha, H., & Ghadiri, S. (2017). A comprehensive review of factors affecting walkability: A case for the Middle East and North Africa region. Travel Behaviour and Society, 11, 114-129.
- American Planning Association (APA). (2016). Walkable communities, healthy places. https://www.planning.org/publications/document/9141726/.
- A. Telega and I. Telega, “Measuring Walkability with GIS — Methods Overview and New Approach Proposal,” 2021. [CrossRef]
- Handy, S. L., Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2010). Land use as a determinant of long-distance commuting: A synthesis of US studies. Urban Studies, 47(6), 1675-1704.
- Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: Paradise lost. Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), 367-384.
- F. Fonseca, “Walkable Cities : Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimar ã es, Portugal,” 2022.
- M. AlMuharraqi, G. Sweis, R. Sweis, and F. Sammour, “Factors affecting the adoption of smart building projects in the Kingdom of Bahrain,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 62, no. September, p. 105325, 2022. [CrossRef]
- Roe, J., & Aspinall, P. (2011). The benefits of walking in nature: A review of evidence from the UK. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(4), 401-413.
- Handy, S. L., Mendoza, C. E., & Perkins, S. E. (2005). Relationship between the physical environment and physical activity among youth in Bogotá, Colombia. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(2), 147-154.
- A. A. Bindajam and J. Mallick, “Impact of the Spatial Configuration of Streets Networks on Urban Growth : A Case Study of Abha City, Saudi Arabia sustainability Impact of the Spatial Configuration of Streets Networks on Urban Growth : A Case Study of Abha City, Saudi Arabia,” no. March, 2020. [CrossRef]
- A. Bartzokas-tsiompras, E. Bakogiannis, and A. Nikitas, “Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings : A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 111, no. June, p. 103645, 2023. [CrossRef]
- T. Santos, F. Ramalhete, R. Pedro, and N. Pires, “Geography and Sustainability Sustainable living neighbourhoods : Measuring public space quality and walking environment in Lisbon,” Geogr. Sustain., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 289–298, 2022. [CrossRef]
- A. Erath, A. Michael, B. Van Eggermond, S. A. Ordóñez, and K. W. Axhausen, “Introducing the Pedestrian Accessibility Tool Walkability Analysis for a Geographic Information System”.
- M. Jabbari, F. Fonseca, and R. Ramos, “Accessibility and Connectivity Criteria for Assessing Walkability : An Application in Qazvin, Iran,” 2021.
- A. Ozbil, J. Peponis, and B. Stone, “Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows,” vol. 16, pp. 125–141, 2011. [CrossRef]
- F. Fonseca, “Walkable Cities : Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimar ã es, Portugal,” 2022.
- G. Hassanshahi, A. Soltani, and M. Roosta, “ScienceDirect Walking as soft mobility : A multi-criteria GIS- based approach for prioritizing tourist routes,” vol. 12, pp. 1080–1096, 2023.
- P. Sahin, “Analysis of Walkable Street Networks by Using the Space Syntax and GIS Techniques : A Case Study of Çankırı City,” 2023.
- O. Klein, F. Escobar, T. Al, and P. Gull, “Computers, Environment and Urban Systems Development of a GIS-based walking route planner with integrated comfort walkability parameters,” vol. 103, no. February, 2023. [CrossRef]
- M. O. F. Architecture, “STUDY OF PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT IN RELATION TO SPATIAL CONFIGURATION AND LAND-USE PATTERN IN THE CONTEXT,” no. December, 2016.
- T. Case, C. Old, and F. Fareh, “The Effect of Spatial Configuration on the Movement Distribution Behavior,” vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 9136–9141, 2022.
- S. A. Waheeb, B. Zerouali, A. Elbeltagi, M. Alwetaishi, and Y. J. Wong, “Enhancing Sustainable Urban Planning through GIS and Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis : A Case Study of Green Space Infrastructure in Taif Province, Saudi Arabia,” 2023.
- Schröpfer, T.; Menz, S.; Yeo, M.T. From garden city to city in a garden and beyond. In Dense and Green Building Typologies: Research, Policy and Practice Perspectives; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 21–25. [Google Scholar]
- S. A. N. I. S. Uleiman, V. C. A. Garwal, D. E. L. Al, and A. M. S. Unusi, “Optimal Route Location by Least Cost Path ( LCP ) Analysis using ( GIS ), A Case Study,” vol. 04, no. 44, pp. 9621–9626, 2015.
- H. Abusaada, “Can Public Spaces Alleviate Poverty-Related Feelings ? Content,” 2023.
- “Assessment of Urban Spaces of Mixed-Use Areas and Their Role in Achieving Social Sustainability in Closed Urban Communities in Greater Cairo,” vol. 7, no. 5, p. 705014, 2023.
- T. Hartig, R. Mitchell, S. De Vries, and H. Frumkin, “Nature and Health,” 2014. [CrossRef]
- A. Ozbil, T. Gurleyen, D. Yesiltepe, and E. Zunbuloglu, “Comparative Associations of Street Network Design, Streetscape Attributes and Land-Use Characteristics on Pedestrian Flows in Peripheral Neighbourhoods,” 2019.
- A. Erturan and S., C. Van Der Spek, “Walkability analyses of Delft city centre by Go- Along walks and testing of different design scenarios for a more walkable environment Walkability analyses of Delft city centre by Go-Along walks,” J. Urban Des., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 287–309, 2022. [CrossRef]
- A. Council, ASSESSING SAUDI VISION 2030 : A 2020 REVIEW. 2020.
- Tang, Q.; Dou,W. An Effective Method for Computing the Least-Cost Path Using a Multi-Resolution Raster Cost Surface Model. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2023, 12, 287. [CrossRef]
- J. Lee, “Exploring Neighborhood Unit ’ s Planning Elements and Configuration Methods in Seoul and Singapore from a Walkability Perspective,” 2018. [CrossRef]
- Saaty, T.L. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J. Math. Psychol. 1977, 15, 234–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlShareef ,F and Aljoufie, M. Identification of the Proper Criteria Set for Neighborhood Walkability Using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Model: A Case Study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9286.
- Sepehrian, Z, Khoshfetrat, S and Ebadi, S. An Approach for Generating Weights Using the Pairwise Comparison Matrix. Journal of Mathematics. 2021. | Article ID 3217120 |. [CrossRef]







| Scales | Degree of Importance | Descriptions |
| 1 | Equal | The two criteria are equally important to the other pairs |
| 3 | Moderate | The criteria are slight to moderately more important |
| 5 | Strong | The criteria are much more important or essential |
| 7 | Very strong | The criteria are strongly favored over the other pairs, and this is shown in practice |
| 9 | Extremely strong | The criteria are undeniably favored over the other pairs, and this is shown in practice |
| 2,4,6,8 | Intermediate values | Used to represent intermediate values between degree 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 |
| N (Number of Factors) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| RI | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 | 0.89 | 1.11 | 1.25 | 1.35 | 1.40 | 1.45 | 1.49 |
| Walking urban corridors number | Length (m) |
| 1 | 1401 |
| 2 | 1283 |
| 3 | 1507 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).