1. Introduction
The global population is projected to continue increasing in the coming decades. According to the latest United Nations report [
1], estimates suggest there will be 8.5 billion people by 2030 and 9.8 billion by 2050. This upward trend in world population presents significant challenges in terms of meeting food demand and ensuring sustainable agriculture practices. Achieving a balance between environmentally friendly farming methods and high-quality yields is paramount in the 21st century [
2]. While intensive farming may offer improved income, it tends to be unsustainable and detrimental to the environment [
3]. Reliance on mineral fertilizers, pesticides, and intensive tillage practices may have adverse effects on soil quality [
4,
5], exacerbating climate change and rendering traditional agricultural systems susceptible to extreme weather events [
6].
Organic amendments have historically supplied essential nutrients to crops, but their usage declined with the mechanization of agricultural practices and the availability of affordable chemical fertilizers [
7]. Chemical fertilizers, containing vital NPK nutrients, rapidly enhance soil fertility and support plant growth [
8]. However, their long-term impacts can lead to soil pollution, reduced fertility, and imbalances in soil nutrients [
9]. Organic matter plays a vital role in soil fertility and overall soil functioning, influencing its physical, chemical, and biological properties [
10,
11]. Excessive application of chemical fertilizers, in turn, may lead to a reduction in soil organic matter, thereby negatively impacting general soil properties [
12,
13].
Intensive agricultural practices without organic amendments result in reduced soil carbon (C) content, microbial biomass, enzymatic activities, species diversity, and increased soil salinity [
14]. Establishing a soil conservation baseline entails implementing conservation agriculture techniques and enriching soils with organic matter. Common sources of organic matter for soil enrichment may include farmyard manures [
13,
15,
16], municipal solid waste [
17,
18] and sewage sludge [
19,
20]. The use of high-quality compost is crucial for its safe and effective utilization in soil [
20,
21].
Scholars worldwide are currently researching sustainable waste sources and decomposition methods [
22]. Insects and their excreta have shown promising potential for use in agriculture, particularly as soil amendments [
23]. The byproduct of insect bioconversion, known as "frass", contains significant amounts of nutrients and can be marketed as fertilizing materials, offering additional income for breeding operations [
24]. With the expanding insect industry globally, frass production is expected to increase, driven by waste recycling and circular economy policies [
25,
26]. Furthermore, there is an ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness of organic agriculture in ensuring food security [
27]. Farmers have the option to adopt conservation practices, and their decisions are influenced by factors such as community pressure, financial incentives, and information availability [
28].
Therefore, additional research is necessary to establish the best conditions for utilizing insect frass and to scale up this industry significantly [
29]. This includes studying the effects of insect byproducts on soil properties and plant growth. To address current knowledge gaps, our study began examining the effect of two commercial products resulting from black soldier fly (
Hermetia illucens) larvae frass and mealworm (
Tenebrio molitor) larvae frass on lettuce (
Lactuca sativa L.) growth, plant nutritional status, and soil properties. For comparison, the study included a commercially available organic compost, which has been on the market for a long time resulting from composting forestry, agro-industrial, and domestic waste, sold as a pelletized and dehydrated material and permitted in organic farming in Portugal. Additionally, the study included two treatments with mineral N fertilization at equivalent and half rates of the N provided by organic amendments, as well as a control treatment without fertilization. In this way, through multiple comparisons, we aim to understand how to position these new organic amendments in crop recommendation systems.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Conditions
A pot experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, located in Northeastern Portugal (41.797254°N -6.762279°W). The experiment involved two growing cycles of lettuce (cv. Summer Wonder) and a single growing cycle of oats (Avena sativa L., cv. Boa Fé). Lettuce was cultivated during the first cycle, spanning from May to June, and again in the second cycle, which took place from August to October 2023. Oats were grown from October 2023 to January 2024.
The region's climate falls under the Mediterranean type, classified as Csb according to the Köppen classification, characterized by mild, dry summers [
30]. Weather data collected during the experimental period are presented in
Figure 1.
The soil used in this study was collected from the surface layer (0-0.20 m) of a fallow plot. It is classified as a Regosol of coluvial origin, presenting a sandy-clay-loam texture (soil separates of 228.7, 241.0, and 530.3 g kg–1 of clay, silt, and sand, respectively). Soil organic C content was 11.0 g kg–1 and the pH (H2O) 6.5. Extractable phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) levels were 133.5 and 191.7 mg kg–1, P2O5 and K2O, respectively. Exchangeable calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and cation exchange capacity (CEC) were 9.6, 4.7, and 15.3 cmolc kg–1, respectively.
2.2. Experimental Design and Fertilizing Materials
The first growing cycle of lettuce experiment followed a completely randomized design, comprising six treatments and six replicates. The treatments consisted of: 1) Nutrimais
® (Nutri), an organic amendment derived from composting forestry, agro-industrial, and domestic waste, available in pelletized and dehydrated form, permitted for organic farming in Portugal; 2) Black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), a pelletized organic amendment produced from insect droppings by Entogreen
®; 3) Mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), also a natural pelletized organic amendment from insect droppings and plant debris, manufactured by ThunderFoods
®; 4) Ammonium nitrate (27% N, 50% NH
4+, 50% NO
3-), applied at the same N rate (FullR) as the three organic amendments; 5) Ammonium nitrate, applied at half the N rate (HalfR) of the organic amendments; and 6) a non-fertilized control (Cont).
Table 1 presents the main properties of the three organic amendments used in this study.
The treatments Nutri, BSFly, Mealw, and FullR were applied at a rate of 50 kg N ha–1. To calculate the quantities of amendments and fertilizer for each plot, a standard planting density of 140,000 plants ha–1 was used. Thus, each pot received 1/140,000 of the amendments corresponding to one hectare. Considering the moisture content and N concentration of the organic amendments, they were applied at rates of 19.93, 15.33, and 22.72 g pot–1 for BSFly, Mealw, and Nutri. Ammonium nitrate was applied at rates of 1.59 g pot–1 for FullR and 0.79 g pot–1 for HalfR treatments. The application of ammonium nitrate at full and half rates was split into two applications: at transplanting and in the middle of the growing season. Each pot received 3 kg of dried (40 ºC) and sieved (2 mm) soil, 50 g of perlite to ensure aeration, and the corresponding quantity of amendments and fertilizer. The first growing cycle ran from May 3rd to June 15th.
After completing the first lettuce cycle, the experiment was divided into two, forming two groups of pots with three replicates each. In one group, the fertilization from the first cycle was repeated to assess the continued effect of the fertilizer treatments on lettuce growth and nutrition. In the other group, no fertilizers were applied. Since organic amendments release nutrients gradually through the mineralization process, the aim in this second group of pots was to evaluate the residual effect of fertilization from the first cycle. This second lettuce growth cycle ran from August 25th to October 2nd, 2023.
After completing the second lettuce growth cycle, oats, a species with high N requirements capable of thriving during the autumn-winter period, were sown. Oats were planted in both groups of pots, with 20 seeds per pot, later adjusted to 15 plants per pot after germination. The oats were not fertilized and were intended to evaluate the residual effect of the fertilization applied to the lettuce. The oat cropping cycle began on October 13th, 2023, and concluded on January 18th, 2024, when all plants exhibited chlorosis and stunted growth, at the stem elongation phase (with node 2 at least 2 cm above node 1) [
31]. This approach aimed to gather detailed information on the short and long-term effects of organic fertilization. Mineral fertilization was included in the experiment as a positive control to assess the nutrient use efficiency of organic amendments compared to the more standardized use of mineral fertilizers.
2.3. Conducting the Experiment
Seedlings at the phenological growth stage 13, 3rd true leaf unfolded [
31] were used, having been previously grown in commercial organic substrate. The pots were placed outdoors on a wooden platform with lateral protection to prevent direct sunlight and minimize pot heating. Regularly, the pots were rotated to ensure equivalent radiation exposure conditions. Weeds were promptly removed after germination.
The pots were watered as needed, ensuring that the lettuce plants remained well hydrated. In this type of experiment, the same amount of water is not applied to all pots because different fertilizations induce varying growth and transpiration rates, necessitating constant adjustment of water quantities per pot. Plates were placed under the pots to prevent nutrient leaching.
2.4. Sampling and Laboratory Analyses
The lettuces and oats were harvested by cutting them at ground level and then divided into several segments to facilitate the drying process. Once cut, the plants were oven-dried at 70 °C until reaching constant weight, after which they were ground through a 1 mm mesh. Subsequently, tissue samples were digested using nitric acid. Elemental tissue analysis was conducted using Kjeldahl method for N, colorimetry for boron (B) and P, flame emission spectrometry for K, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry for Ca, Mg, copper (Cu), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and manganese (Mn). For a detailed description of these methodologies, the reader is referred to Temminghoff and Houba [
32]. Nitrate concentration in lettuce tissues were determined by UV-vis spectrophotometry in a water extract (dry matter:water, 1:50 m/v) [
33].
After the conclusion of the second lettuce growing cycle, soil samples were collected from the pots immediately before they were used for the oat experiment. The soil samples were oven-dried at 40 °C, sieved again through a 2 mm mesh, and analyzed for various parameters including organic C (determined using the wet digestion Walkley-Black method), soil pH (measured in water and KCl solutions at a soil-to-solution ratio of 1:2.5 using potentiometry), exchangeable bases (extracted with ammonium acetate at pH 7.0 and determined by atomic absorption spectrometry), exchangeable acidity (extracted with KCl and quantified through titration with sodium hydroxide), P and K (analyzed using the Egnér–Riehm method), and B (extracted with hot water and determined using the azomethine-H method). For detailed information on these analytical procedures, please refer to Van Reeuwijk [
34]. The other micronutrients (Cu, Fe, Zn, and Mn) were extracted using diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) buffered at pH 7.3 and determined by atomic absorption spectrometry, following the procedures of FAO [
35]. The analyses conducted on the initial soil samples (table 1) also followed these same procedures. Additionally, soil separates were determined in these initial soil samples using the Robison pipette method.
2.5. Data Analysis
The data were subjected to analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) after being tested for normality and variance homogeneity using the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. Whenever the ANOVA revealed significant differences among treatments, means were separated using the Tukey HSD multiple comparison test (α = 0.05).
Apparent N Recovery (ANR) was estimated by the equation: ANR (%) = 100 × (N recovered by plants in fertilized treatments - N recovered by plants in the control)/N applied as fertilizer.
Figure 1.
Climatological normal data for the region (1981-2010) and monthly average air temperature and precipitation during the experimental period.
Figure 1.
Climatological normal data for the region (1981-2010) and monthly average air temperature and precipitation during the experimental period.
Figure 2.
Dry matter yield of lettuce across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first growing cycle. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 2.
Dry matter yield of lettuce across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first growing cycle. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 3.
Dry matter yield of lettuce across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle, in pots that received (a) and did not receive (b) the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 3.
Dry matter yield of lettuce across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle, in pots that received (a) and did not receive (b) the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 4.
Nitrogen (N) concentration in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first growing cycle. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0. 05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 4.
Nitrogen (N) concentration in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first growing cycle. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0. 05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 5.
Nitrogen (N) concentration in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle, in pots that received (a) and did not receive (b) the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 5.
Nitrogen (N) concentration in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle, in pots that received (a) and did not receive (b) the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 6.
Nitrate (NO3-) concentration in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first growing cycle. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 6.
Nitrate (NO3-) concentration in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first growing cycle. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 7.
Nitrate (NO3-) concentration in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle, in pots that received (a) and did not receive (b) the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Figure 7.
Nitrate (NO3-) concentration in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle, in pots that received (a) and did not receive (b) the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers. Means with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey HSD test, α = 0.05). Vertical bars represent standard errors.
Table 1.
Selected properties (mean ± standard deviation, n=3) of the organic amendments used in this study: black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw) and Nutrimais (Nutri).
Table 1.
Selected properties (mean ± standard deviation, n=3) of the organic amendments used in this study: black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw) and Nutrimais (Nutri).
| |
BSFly |
Mealw |
Nutri |
| Moisture content (%) |
25.3 ± 0.72 |
7.4 ± 0.05 |
8.0 ± 0.19 |
| pH (H2O) |
7.6 ± 0.21 |
6.5 ± 0.31 |
8.1 ± 0.15 |
| El. conduct. (mS cm–1) |
9.9 ± 0.46 |
7.3 ± 0.56 |
9.7 ± 0.45 |
| Carbon (g kg–1) |
499.5 ± 2.30 |
517.7 ± 0.64 |
419.0 ± 3.90 |
| Nitrogen (g kg–1) |
26.8 ± 0.06 |
31.3 ± 0.51 |
25.3 ± 1.00 |
| Carbon/nitrogen ratio |
18.6 ± 0.11 |
16.5 ± 0.26 |
16.5 ± 1.14 |
| Phosphorus (g kg–1) |
11.7 ± 0.66 |
10.7 ± 0.18 |
4.8 ± 0.13 |
| Potassium (g kg–1) |
31.2 ± 0.89 |
18.4 ± 2.11 |
17.3 ± 0.16 |
| Calcium (g kg–1) |
3.1 ± 0.02 |
3.8 ± 0.07 |
75.9 ± 3.12 |
| Magnesium (g kg–1) |
4.9 ± 0.06 |
6.5 ± 0.28 |
3.2 ± 0.07 |
| Boron (mg kg–1) |
32.3 ± 0.35 |
26.0 ± 0.61 |
8.3 ± 0.65 |
| Iron (mg kg–1) |
761.9 ±31.11 |
422.9 ± 12.18 |
5230.3 ± 212.42 |
| Manganese (mg kg–1) |
87.4 ± 1.50 |
155.7 ± 5.67 |
133.7 ± 2.96 |
| Zinc (mg kg–1) |
108.8 ± 0.94 |
107.5 ± 1.82 |
103.7 ± 2.60 |
| Copper (mg kg–1) |
19.6 ± 0.36 |
14.0 ± 0.21 |
36.5 ± 0.10 |
Table 2.
Apparent nitrogen (N) recovery by lettuces across fertilization treatments [Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first and second growing cycle (GC) in pots that received (with) and did not receive (without) the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
Table 2.
Apparent nitrogen (N) recovery by lettuces across fertilization treatments [Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first and second growing cycle (GC) in pots that received (with) and did not receive (without) the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
| |
Apparent N recovery (%) |
| |
1st GC |
2nd CG (without) |
2nd GC (with) |
Total (1st + 2nd with) |
| Nutri |
-4.0 |
0.6 |
-1.0 |
-2.5 |
| BSFly |
11.1 |
20.5 |
10.8 |
10.9 |
| Mealw |
37.3 |
41.3 |
37.6 |
37.4 |
| HalfR |
96.6 |
105.9 |
59.0 |
78.3 |
| FullR |
71.9 |
87.2 |
52.0 |
62.0 |
Table 3.
Concentration of macro and micronutrients in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first growing cycle.
Table 3.
Concentration of macro and micronutrients in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the first growing cycle.
| |
P |
K |
Ca |
Mg |
|
B |
Fe |
Mn |
Zn |
Cu |
| |
g kg–1
|
|
mg kg–1
|
| Cont |
2.6 c |
43.8 b |
6.9 ab |
2.3 b |
|
35.5 a |
2161.9 a |
88.4 bc |
76.1 ab |
32.7 a |
| Nutri |
2.7 c |
53.5 ab |
8.3 a |
2.7 ab |
|
32.8 a |
2062.8 a |
73.8 c |
58.4 b |
29.4 ab |
| BSFly |
3.2 b |
54.2 ab |
7.2 ab |
2.3 b |
|
34.3 a |
1889.1 a |
86.0 c |
67.7 ab |
33.8 a |
| Mealw |
3.7 a |
56.4 a |
7.3 ab |
2.4 ab |
|
34.6 a |
1407.5 b |
82.1 c |
71.9 ab |
28.3 ab |
| HalfR |
2.6 c |
44.1 ab |
7.2 ab |
2.5 ab |
|
33.9 a |
1133.2 b |
103.2 ab |
80.0 ab |
25.6 b |
| FullR |
2.6 c |
45.0 ab |
6.7 b |
2.9 a |
|
31.3 a |
1115.1 b |
107.0 a |
87.7 a |
23.9 b |
| Prob |
<0.0001 |
0.0077 |
0.0453 |
0.0115 |
|
0.1314 |
<0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
0.0118 |
0.0002 |
Table 4.
Concentration of macro and micronutrients in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle in pots that received the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
Table 4.
Concentration of macro and micronutrients in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle in pots that received the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
| |
P |
K |
Ca |
Mg |
|
B |
Fe |
Mn |
Zn |
Cu |
| |
g kg–1
|
|
mg kg–1
|
| Cont |
1.3 a |
49.5 a |
8.9 a |
3.8 a |
|
27.8 a |
1332.5 ab |
70.5 a |
57.2 a |
11.0 ab |
| Nutri |
1.0 a |
50.7 a |
9.5 a |
4.1 a |
|
26.1 a |
1487.8 a |
58.8 a |
70.4 a |
14.8 a |
| BSFly |
1.1 a |
49.9 a |
7.5 b |
3.2 a |
|
27.9 a |
660.2 ab |
62.1 a |
79.1 a |
10.0 b |
| Mealw |
1.0 a |
50.2 a |
7.2 b |
3.5 a |
|
27.7 a |
816.9 ab |
84.1 a |
68.9 a |
11.4 ab |
| HalfR |
0.9 a |
41.4 ab |
7.5 b |
4.0 a |
|
24.2 a |
733.4 ab |
80.6 a |
76.8 a |
12.5 ab |
| FullR |
1.3 a |
39.6 b |
6.7 b |
3.8 a |
|
22.8 a |
570.9 b |
87.6 a |
79.3 a |
12.2 ab |
| Prob |
0.3630 |
0.0300 |
<0.0001 |
0.2630 |
|
0.0554 |
0.0171 |
0.1772 |
0.4862 |
0.0476 |
Table 5.
Concentration of macro and micronutrients in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle in pots that did not receive the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
Table 5.
Concentration of macro and micronutrients in lettuce tissues across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in the second growing cycle in pots that did not receive the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
| |
P |
K |
Ca |
Mg |
|
B |
Fe |
Mn |
Zn |
Cu |
| |
g kg–1
|
|
mg kg–1
|
| Cont |
1.2 a |
47.8 a |
9.1 a |
3.9 a |
|
27.2 ab |
1117.0 a |
69.0 a |
63.1 a |
11.6 a |
| Nutri |
1.1 a |
47.4 a |
7.9 a |
3.3 a |
|
27.6 a |
1058.4 a |
53.5 a |
58.0 a |
10.8 a |
| BSFly |
1.2 a |
42.2 a |
7.3 a |
3.3 a |
|
27.2 a |
691.2 a |
54.5 a |
54.3 a |
10.0 a |
| Mealw |
0.9 a |
38.9 a |
8.3 a |
3.5 a |
|
28.3 ab |
983.7 a |
74.3 a |
54.7 a |
13.3 a |
| HalfR |
1.1 a |
48.2 a |
9.1 a |
4.0 a |
|
28.7a |
986.0 a |
78.0 a |
75.0 a |
11.4 a |
| FullR |
1.1 a |
44.2 a |
7.0 a |
3.4 a |
|
23.8 b |
661.5 a |
87.2 a |
71.9 a |
10.6 a |
| Prob |
0.8482 |
0.1440 |
0.0686 |
0.0604 |
|
0.0119 |
0.2245 |
0.0443 |
0.4587 |
0.3428 |
Table 6.
Nitrogen (N) in the form of nitrate (NO3-) and ammonium (NH4+) in the soil at the end of the second lettuce growing cycle across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in pots that received and did not receive the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
Table 6.
Nitrogen (N) in the form of nitrate (NO3-) and ammonium (NH4+) in the soil at the end of the second lettuce growing cycle across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in pots that received and did not receive the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
| |
Two fertilizer applications |
|
Fertilizers applied once |
| |
NO3--N |
NH4+-N |
Inorg-N |
|
NO3--N |
NH4+-N |
Inorg-N |
| |
|
mg kg–1
|
|
|
|
mg kg–1
|
|
| Cont |
2.2 b |
0.3 b |
2.5 b |
|
2.3 bc |
0.5 c |
2.8 b |
| Nutri |
3.9 ab |
1.5 b |
5.4 b |
|
3.8 ab |
1.6 bc |
5.4 ab |
| BSFly |
1.7 b |
1.8 b |
3.4 b |
|
1.4 c |
2.9 ab |
4.3 b |
| Mealw |
4.1 ab |
3.4 b |
7.4 b |
|
4.3 a |
3.8 a |
8.1 a |
| HalfR |
3.4 ab |
3.0 b |
6.4 b |
|
2.6 abc |
1.2 bc |
3.8 b |
| FullR |
6.4 a |
10.1 a |
16.5 a |
|
3.0 abc |
2.7 ab |
5.7 ab |
| Prob |
0.0039 |
0.0001 |
<0.0001 |
|
0.0035 |
0.0013 |
0.0011 |
Table 7.
Dry matter yield (DMY), tissue N and N recovery of oats across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in pots that received and did not receive the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
Table 7.
Dry matter yield (DMY), tissue N and N recovery of oats across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in pots that received and did not receive the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
| |
Two fertilizer applications |
|
Fertilizers applied once |
| |
DMY |
Tissue N |
N recovery |
|
DMY |
Tissue N |
N recovery |
| |
g pot–1
|
g kg–1
|
mg pot–1
|
|
g pot–1
|
g kg–1
|
mg pot–1
|
| Cont |
1.2 c |
17.0 a |
21.4 c |
|
1.3 b |
18.6 a |
26.0 a |
| Nutri |
1.4 c |
16.1 a |
22.2 c |
|
1.3 b |
17.3 a |
22.0 a |
| BSFly |
3.1 a |
15.7 a |
48.1 a |
|
2.0 a |
17.2 a |
34.3 a |
| Mealw |
2.8 ab |
16.5 a |
46.2ab |
|
1.8 ab |
15.5 a |
28.3 a |
| HalfR |
2.2 b |
15.9 a |
35.1 b |
|
1.4 ab |
17.7 a |
25.2 a |
| FullR |
2.6 ab |
14.2 a |
37.3 ab |
|
1.5 ab |
16.8 a |
25.0 a |
| Prob |
<0.0001 |
0.0571 |
< 0.0001 |
|
0.0318 |
0.1232 |
0.3163 |
Table 8.
Soil properties at the end of the second growing cycle of lettuce across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in pots that received the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
Table 8.
Soil properties at the end of the second growing cycle of lettuce across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in pots that received the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
| |
Cont |
Nutr |
BSFly |
Mealw |
HalfR |
FullR |
Prob |
| Organic C (g kg–1) |
8.8 b |
9.9 ab |
11.4 a |
11.5 a |
8.4 b |
10.6 ab |
0.0337 |
| pH(H2O) |
6.6 a |
6.7 a |
6.5 a |
6.7 a |
6.7 a |
6.5 a |
0.1076 |
| Extract P (mg kg–1) |
124.5 bc |
148.8 bc |
216.6 a |
193.4 a |
89.8 c |
97.4 c |
< 0.0001 |
| Extract K (mg kg–1) |
128.3 ab |
123.7 b |
151.7 a |
110.7 b |
83.3 c |
75.3 c |
< 0.0001 |
| Exchang Ca (cmolc kg–1) |
16.0 a |
17.0 a |
16.8 a |
15.9 a |
16.4 a |
14.8 a |
0.2424 |
| Exchang Mg (cmolc kg–1) |
5.3 bc |
5.3 bc |
6.4 a |
5.8 ab |
5.3 bc |
4.8 c |
0.0023 |
| CEC (cmolc kg–1) |
21.9 a |
23.2 a |
24.0 a |
22.4 a |
22.4 a |
20.1 a |
0.0858 |
| Extract Fe (mg kg–1) |
123.0 a |
106.4 a |
107.1 a |
100.3 a |
108.2 a |
107.7 a |
0.1963 |
| Extract Zn (mg kg–1) |
4.1 a |
4.6 a |
5.1 a |
5.3 a |
4.0 a |
4.2 a |
0.2432 |
| Extract Cu (mg kg–1) |
71.0 a |
67.7 a |
69.5 a |
67.0 a |
73.2 a |
75.3 a |
0.8506 |
| Extract Mn (mg kg–1) |
176.3 a |
144.2 a |
153.6 a |
146.0 a |
159.5 a |
154.0 a |
0.0781 |
Table 9.
Soil properties at the end of second growing cycle of lettuce across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in pots that did not receive the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
Table 9.
Soil properties at the end of second growing cycle of lettuce across fertilization treatments [Control (Cont), Nutrimais (Nutri), black soldier fly larvae frass (BSFly), mealworm larvae frass (Mealw), half the rate ammonium nitrate (HalfR), full rate of ammonium nitrate (FullR)] in pots that did not receive the second dose of organic amendments and fertilizers.
| |
Cont |
Nutri |
BSFly |
Mealw |
HalfR |
FullR |
Prob |
| Organic C (g kg–1) |
8.2 c |
11.2 a |
11.3 a |
10.5 ab |
8.6 bc |
9.4 abc |
0.0014 |
| pH(H2O) |
6.5 a |
6.7 a |
6.7 a |
6.7 a |
6.5 a |
6.5 a |
0.0531 |
| Extract P (mg kg–1) |
96.7 b |
153.9 a |
166.2 a |
163.4 a |
90.1 b |
90.3 b |
< 0.0001 |
| Extract K (mg kg–1) |
104.0 b |
128.0 a |
115.3 b |
115.3 b |
91.7 c |
82.0 c |
< 0.0001 |
| Exchang Ca (cmol+ kg–1) |
15.8 a |
17.1 a |
16.1 a |
15.9 a |
14.8 a |
15.4 a |
0.1119 |
| Exchang Mg (cmol+ kg–1) |
5.3 ab |
5.3 ab |
5.8 a |
5.5 ab |
5.0 b |
4.9 b |
0.0147 |
| CEC (cmolc kg–1) |
21.7 a |
23.2 a |
22.6 a |
22.0 a |
20.5 a |
20.9 a |
0.1178 |
| Extract Fe (mg kg–1) |
117.8 a |
118.0 a |
109.0 a |
94.3 a |
108.7 a |
104.7 a |
0.2596 |
| Extract Zn (mg kg–1) |
5.0 a |
5.1 a |
5.0 a |
4.9 a |
3.9 a |
4.1 a |
0.3151 |
| Extract Cu (mg kg–1) |
71.2 a |
73.0 a |
76.0 a |
69.5 a |
69.0 a |
70.4 a |
0.8828 |
| Extract Mn (mg kg–1) |
175.5 a |
162.0 a |
160.4 a |
137.8 a |
160.6 a |
151.0 a |
0.2789 |