Submitted:
30 May 2024
Posted:
31 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1.1. Background of the Study
1.2. Literature Review
Materials and Methods
2.1. The Study Design and Sample Size
2.2. The Study Area
2.3. Instruments and Method of Data Collection
2.4. Method of Data Analysis
Results
- A.
- The Socio-Demographic Parameters of the Study
- B.
- The Knowledge of DUFUHS Health Clinic
- C.
- The Attitude of Students and DUFUHS Health Clinic
- D.
- The Practice of Students/Staff in DUFUHS Health Clinic
4.0. Discussions
4.1. Discussion of Results
4.2. Conclusion
4.3. Study Limitations
- Difficulty in manual/ paper-based analysis of data.
- Time constraints due to compounded work schedules.
4.4. Contributions to Knowledge
4.5. Recommendations
- The DUFUHS management/Senate should enact a law to define policy protocols for the university healthcare clinic to run a student-centred system, in other to boost the confidence of students in a healthy learning environment.
- The DUFUHS management should embrace the Tertiary Institutions’ Social Health Insurance Programme (TISHIP) of the federal government with context-specific modifications. The TISHIP is a social security system (student-centred healthcare system) that pools funds from compulsory contributions involving students and the government.
- University management should as a matter of duty create a routine monitoring and evaluation mechanism to help measure the level of service impact and rate of student patronage.
4.6. Policy Implication
References
- Abdullah A. (2017). Utilisation of University Health Care Centre Services among University Students.International Journal of Health Sciences and Research.7(4); (Available at: www.ijhsr.org).
- Anetoh M. U.,Jibuaku H. C., Nduka S. O. and Uzodinma S. U. (2017).Knowledge and Implementation of Tertiary Institutions’ Social Health Insurance Programme (TISHIP) in Nigeria.The Pan African Medical Journal, 28(171).1-10. (Available: http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/28/171/full/).
- Canel C. and Anderson E.A.F. (2001). An Analysis of Service Quality at a Student Health Care.International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance.14(6), 260-267. http://www.emerald-library.com/ft.
- Floyd, D.L. (2003). Student health: challenges for community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, (27): pp.25-39.
- Graf L. (2015). "An Online Survey of the Healthcare Needs of Undergraduate Students at an Urban University". College of Science and Health Thesis and Dissertation.Paper 100.
- Hannan, A., & Silver, H. (2000).Innovating in higher education: Teaching, learning and institutional cultures. Philadelphia, PA: SRHE & Open University Press.
- Mccaig M. M. (2013). Importance and Effectiveness of Student Health Services at a South Texas University.
- National Center for Education Statistics, (NCES). Digest of education statistics tables and figures. Table 213.andFast Facts. Washington, DC: Available at: http://nces.ed.gov.
- Prasad, V.M (2013). Level of satisfaction in patients/attendants admitted with traumatic brain injury at an advanced ER/Casualty in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. Journal of Hospital Administration, Vol. 2, No. 2; pp.89-96.
- Shagaya Y. J. (2015). Assessment of Student’s Satisfaction and Quality of Patient Care under the Nigerian Tertiary Institutions Social Health Insurance Programme. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(6).Pp.20-30.
- Swail, W. (2005).The ongoing retention challenge.Educational Policy Institute, (epi). Available at: http://www.educationalpolicy.org.
- Sweeny, S. (2005). Education update online. College of New Rochelle New York. http://www.cnr.edu.
- Tinto, V. (2012).Completing college: Rethinking Institutional Action. University of Chicago Press.
- Williams, T. (2002). Challenges in supporting student learning and success through studentservices. New Directions for Community Colleges.Spring, No.117, pp.67-76.
| Biodata: Gender | Frequency | Percentage |
| Male | 23 | 46% |
| Female | 27 | 54% |
| Total | Total = 49 | 100% |
| Age: Category | Frequency | Percentage |
| >25 | 34 | 75.6% |
| 25-34 | 10 | 22.2% |
| 35-44 | 1 | 2.2% |
| ≥45 | - | - |
| Total | Total = 45 | 100% |
| Academic Parameter | Percentage | |
| Departments: | CSC - 6 CHEMISTRY – 4 MED SURG - 7 MED LAB- 3 NURSING - 6 RADIOLOGY - 4 PHARMACY - 10 BIOMEDICAL ENG - 4 MBC - 6 Total = 50 |
12% 8% 14% 6% 12% 8% 20% 8% 12% |
| Faculty: | APP. & NATURAL SCI -16 MEDICINE - 7 PHARMACY- 10 HEALTH SCIENCE-13 Total = 50 |
36% 14% 20% 28% |
| Level: | 100 - 28 200 - 12 300 - 10 |
56% 24% 20% |
| Total | 100% |



Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).