Submitted:
21 May 2024
Posted:
21 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Microbial-Driven Capacities and a More Sustainable Future
3. Bioelectrical and Biomagnetic Processes in Human Cellular Life
4. Early Examples of Electrical and Magnetic Applications in Human Medicine
6. Electric Microbes and Electrical Field Effects
7. Microbes and Various Types of Magnetic Fields
8. Electromagnetic Waves and Microbes
9. Perspectives on Sustainble Living and Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bosch, T.C.; Miller, DJ. The Holobiont Imperative. 2016 Springer-Verlag Wien, 155pp. [CrossRef]
- Simon, JC.; Marchesi, J.R.; Mougel, C.; Selosse, M.A. Host-microbiota interactions: from holobiont theory to analysis. Microbiome 2019, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dominguez-Bello, M.G.; Godoy-Vitorino, F.; Knight, R.; Blaser, M.J. Role of the microbiome in human development. Gut 2019, 68, 1108–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhushan, B.; Singh, B.P.; Saini, K.; Kumari, M.; Tomar, S.K.; Mishra, V. Role of microbes, metabolites and effector compounds in host–microbiota interaction: a pharmacological outlook. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 1801–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietert, R.R.; Dietert, J.M. The Human Superorganism: Using Microbes for Freedom vs. Fear. App. Microbiol. 2023, 3, 883–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietert, R.R.; Dietert, J.M. Using Microbiome-Based Approaches to Deprogram Chronic Disorders and Extend the Healthspan following Adverse Childhood Experiences. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pang, S.; Chen, X.; Lu, Z.; Meng, L.; Huang, Y.; Yu, X.; Huang, L.; Ye, P.; Chen, X.; Liang, J.; Peng, T. Longevity of centenarians is reflected by the gut microbiome with youth-associated signatures. Nature Aging 2023, 3, 436–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caballero-Flores, G.; Pickard, J.M.; Núñez, G. Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance: mechanisms and regulation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Y.; Wei, X.; Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L. A Review on Maternal and Infant Microbiota and Their Implications for the Prevention and Treatment of Allergic Diseases. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dosch, C.; Manigk, A.; Streicher, T.; Tehel, A.; Paxton, R.J.; Tragust, S. The Gut Microbiota Can Provide Viral Tolerance in the Honey Bee. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vernier, C.L.; Nguyen, L.A.; Gernat, T.; Ahmed, A.C.; Chen, Z.; Robinson, G.E. Gut microbiota contribute to variations in honey bee foraging intensity. The ISME J. [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, J.B.; Marshall, C.W.; Cook, C.N. The buzz within: the role of the gut microbiome in honeybee social behavior. J. Exp. Biol. 2024, 227, p–jeb246400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.L.; Huang, Q.; Li, J.L.; Wu, P.; Wei, B.; Li, X.J.; Tang, Q.H.; Dong, Z.X.; Xiong, J.; Tang, H.; Zhang, J. Gut microbiota-driven regulation of queen bee ovarian metabolism. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e02145–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carthey, A.J.; Blumstein, D.T.; Gallagher, R.V.; Tetu, S.G.; Gillings, M.R. 2020. Conserving the holobiont. Funct. Ecol. 2020, 34, 764–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manchon, C.; Muniesa-Merino, F.; Llorente, M.; Esteve-Núñez, A. Microbial photoelectrosynthesis: Feeding purple phototrophic bacteria electricity to produce bacterial biomass. Microb. Biotech. 2023, 16, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ganzorig, B.; Zayabaatar, E.; Pham, M.T.; Marito, S.; Huang, C.-M.; Lee, Y.-H. Lactobacillus plantarum Generate Electricity through Flavin Mononucleotide-Mediated Extracellular Electron Transfer to Upregulate Epithelial Type I Collagen Expression and Thereby Promote Microbial Adhesion to Intestine. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Byrne, J.M.; Amor, M. Biomagnetism: Insights Into Magnetic Minerals Produced by Microorganisms. Elements 2023, 19, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh Rawat, V.; Kaur, J.; Bhagwat, S.; Arora Pandit, M.; Dogra Rawat, C. Deploying microbes as drivers and indicators in ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol. 2023, 31, e13688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hahn, J.; Ding, S.; Im, J.; Harimoto, T.; Leong, K.W.; Danino, T. Bacterial therapies at the interface of synthetic biology and nanomedicine. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2024, 2, 120–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietert, J.M.; Dietert, R.R. Ancient and Alternative Healing Tools for Microbe Management. Amer. J. Biomed.Sci. Res. 2024, 21, 475–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietert, R.R.; Dietert, J.M. Examining Sound, Light, and Vibrations as Tools to Manage Microbes and Support Holobionts, Ecosystems, and Technologies. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sariola, S.; Gilbert, S.F. Toward a Symbiotic Perspective on Public Health: Recognizing the Ambivalence of Microbes in the Anthropocene. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirchhelle, C.; Roberts, A.P. Embracing the monsters: moving from infection control to microbial management. The Lancet Microbe, 2022, 3, e806–e807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dietert, R.R.; Dietert, J.M. Spirituality in the Realm of the Microbes. Amer. J. Biomed.Res. Sci. 2024, 22, 142–147. [Google Scholar]
- Moore, E.R.; Mihaylova, S.A.; Vandamme, P.; Krichevsky, M.I.; Dijkshoorn, L. Microbial systematics and taxonomy: relevance for a microbial commons. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dedeurwaerdere, T. Global microbial commons: institutional challenges for the global exchange and distribution of microorganisms in the life sciences. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rowland, A.L. The Human Microbiome as Visceral Commons: Resisting Rhetorical Enclosure. Rhetoric Soc. Quart. 2023, 53, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirchhelle, C. The Antibiocene–towards an eco-social analysis of humanity’s antimicrobial footprint. Humanities and Social Sci. Comm. 2023, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kato, S.; Hashimoto, K.; Watanabe, K. Microbial interspecies electron transfer via electric currents through conductive minerals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012, 109, 10042–10046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, C.; Lesnik, K.L.; Liu, H. Stay connected: Electrical conductivity of microbial aggregates. Biotech. Adv. 2017, 35, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossi, M.; Iannaci, A.; Tosato, P.; Brunelli, D. Let the microbes power your sensing display. 2017 IEEE SENSORS. [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, J.T.; Su, L.; Zhang, X.; Bennett, G.N.; Silberg, J.J.; Ajo-Franklin, C.M. Real-time bioelectronic sensing of environmental contaminants. Nature 2022, 611, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armstrong, R. Towards the microbial home: an overview of developments in next-generation sustainable architecture. Microb. Biotech. 2023, 16, 1112–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh Rawat, V.; Kaur, J.; Bhagwat, S.; Arora Pandit, M.; Dogra Rawat, C. 2023. Deploying microbes as drivers and indicators in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecol. 2023, 31, e13688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khangura, R.; Ferris, D.; Wagg, C.; Bowyer, J. 2023. Regenerative agriculture—A literature review on the practices and mechanisms used to improve soil health. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slijepcevic, P.; Wickramasinghe, N.C. An internet of microbes straddling the cosmos. Adv. Genet. 2020, 106, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietert, R.R.; Dietert, J.M. Using the Internet of Microbes to Survive the Assault on the Human Microbiome. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Res. 2023, 19, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buono, A; Burnidge, A. 2020. Dancing Our Microbiome at the Science Museum: A Dance/STEAM Collaboration. J. Dance Educ. 2020, 22, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ke, S.; Guimond, A.J.; Tworoger, S.S.; Huang, T.; Chan, A.T.; Liu, Y.Y.; Kubzansky, L.D. Gut feelings: associations of emotions and emotion regulation with the gut microbiome in women. Psycholog. Med. 2023, 53, 7151–7160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietert, R.R.; Dietert, J.M. The Embodied Microbiome. Amer. J. Biomed. Sci. Res. 2023, 20(3), 324–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherwin, E.; Bordenstein, S.R.; Quinn, J.L.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. 2019. Microbiota and the social brain. Science 2019, 366, eaar2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunnen, M.; Carlson, C. 2017. Deeply connected to God's good world, the human microbiome. Christian Scholar's Rev. 2017, 46, 113–125. [Google Scholar]
- Giraldo Herrera, C.E. Microbes and other shamanic beings. Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; 274pp. ISBN 978-3-030-10041-4 (Accessed , 2017). 25 April.
- Al-Attas Bradford, A. 2020. Symbiotic Grace: Holobiont Theology in the Age of the Microbe. Duke University Duke University. ProQuest Dissertation, s Publishing, 2020. 28415181. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2531159392?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations%20&%20Theses (Accessed May 17.
- Al-Attas Bradford, A. , 2022. Religion, Animals, and the Theological Anthropology of Microbes in the Pandemicene. Religions 2022, 13, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietert, R.R.; Dietert, J.M. Spirituality in the Realm of the Microbes. Am. J. Biomed. Sci. Res. 2024, 22, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anand, S.; Hallsworth, J.E.; Timmis, J.; Verstraete, W.; Casadevall, A.; Ramos, J.L.; Sood, U.; Kumar, R.; Hira, P.; Dogra Rawat, C.; Kumar, A. Weaponising microbes for peace. Microb. Biotech. 2023, 16, 1091–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Graham, A.E.; Ledesma-Amaro, R. The microbial food revolution. Nat. Comm. 2023, 14, 2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Slijepcevic, P. Biocivilisations: a new look at the science of life. Chelsea Green Publishing UK. 2023. 272pp. 9: ISBN-13 , 1645. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, B.; Qin, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, W.; Pu, G.; Yuanhe, Z.; Gui, X.; Chu, M. Magnetotactic Bacteria-Based Drug-Loaded Micromotors for Highly Efficient Magnetic and Biological Double-Targeted Tumor Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 2747–2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mishra, R.; Gollakota, A.R.; Shu, C.M. Cultivating Eco-Advantages: Unleashing the Distinctive Potential of Biochar in Microbial Fuel Cells. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2024, 185, 614–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quillin, S.J.; Tran, P.; Prindle, A. Potential roles for gamma-aminobutyric acid signaling in bacterial communities. Bioelectricity 2021, 3, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zou, Y.; Bo, L.; Li, Z. 2021. Recent progress in human body energy harvesting for smart bioelectronic system. Fundam. Res. 2021, 1, 364–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, A.; Asivatham, S.J.; Deneke, T.; Castellvi, Q.; Neal, R.E. Primer on pulsed electrical field ablation: understanding the benefits and limitations. Circ. Arrhythm.Electrophysiol. 2021, 14, e010086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, D.; Huang, Q.; Gu, W.; Zeng, X.A. 2022. A review of bacterial biofilm control by physical strategies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62, 3453–3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Chen, T.; Li, J. Exogenous electric field as a biochemical driving factor for extracellular electron transfer: Increasing power output of microbial fuel cell. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 301, 118050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beretta, G.; Mastorgio, A.F.; Pedrali, L.; Saponaro, S.; and Sezenna, E. The effects of electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields on microorganisms in the perspective of bioremediation. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2019, 18, 29–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, R.; Liang, Y.; Yang, J.; Feng, H.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Bai, Y.; Xue, J.; Chao, S. Reshaping the endogenous electric field to boost wound repair via electrogenerative dressing. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2208395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lüderitz, Berndt. We have come a long way with device therapy: historical perspectives on antiarrhythmic electrotherapy. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2002, 13, S2–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, D.; Wang, S.; Shi, Y.; Ni, S.; Tang, M.; Xu, A. The development of traditional Chinese medicine. J. Traditional Chinese Med. Sci. 2021, 8, S1–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markov, M.S. Magnetic field therapy: a review. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2007, 26, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ross, C.L.; Harrison, B.S. The Use of Magnetic Field for the Reduction of Inflammation: A Review of the History and Therapeutic Results. Altern. Therap. Health Med. 2013, 19, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, C.L.; Ang, D.C.; Almeida-Porada, G. Targeting mesenchymal stromal cells/pericytes (MSCs) with pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) has the potential to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 421274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rumbaut, R.E.; Mirkovic, D. Magnetic therapy for edema in inflammation: a physiological assessment. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2008, 294, H19–H20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Logan, B.E.; Rossi, R.; Ragab, A.A.; Saikaly, P.E. 2019. Electroactive microorganisms in bioelectrochemical systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 307–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomasy, H. Electric Bacteria: Out of the Darkness and into the Light. The Scientist, 17 May 7168. [Google Scholar]
- Potter, M.C. Electrical effects accompanying the decomposition of organic compounds. Proc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 1911, 84, 260–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, J.B. 1963. Generation of electricity by microbial action. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 1963, 5, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nealson, K.H. 2017. Bioelectricity (electromicrobiology) and sustainability. Microbial Biotech. 2017, 10, 1114–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garbini, G.L.; Barra Caracciolo, A.; Grenni, P. Electroactive Bacteria in Natural Ecosystems and Their Applications in Microbial Fuel Cells for Bioremediation: A Review. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- El-Naggar, M.Y.; Wanger, G.; Leung, K.M.; Yuzvinsky, T.D.; Southam, G.; Yang, J.; Lau, W.M.; Nealson, K.H.; Gorby, Y.A. 2010. Electrical transport along bacterial nanowires from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107, 18127–18131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Portela, P.C.; Shipps, C.C.; Shen, C.; Srikanth, V.; Salgueiro, C.A.; Malvankar, N.S. Widespread extracellular electron transfer pathways for charging microbial cytochrome OmcS nanowires via periplasmic cytochromes PpcABCDE. Nat. Comm. 2024, 15, 2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boza, G.; Barabás, G.; Scheuring, I.; and Zachar, I. Eco-evolutionary modelling of microbial syntrophy indicates the robustness of cross-feeding over cross-facilitation. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rotaru, A.E.; Yee, M.O.; Musat, F. Microbes trading electricity in consortia of environmental and biotechnological significance. Curr. Opin. in Biotech. 2021, 67, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, S.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Huang, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, Y.; Luan, T.; Zhou, S.; Nealson, K.H.; Rensing, C. Biophotoelectrochemical process co-driven by dead microalgae and live bacteria. ISME J. 2023, 17, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalcanti, R.N.; Balthazar, C.F.; Margalho, L.P.; Freitas, M.Q.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Cruz, A.G. Pulsed electric field-based technology for microbial inactivation in milk and dairy products. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2023, 54, 101087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Xie, X. Nanosecond bacteria inactivation realized by locally enhanced electric field treatment. Nat. Water 2023, 1, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Lyu, X.; Arshad, R.N.; Aadil, R.M.; Tong, Y.; Zhao, W.; Yang, R. Pulsed electric field as a promising technology for solid foods processing: A review. Food Chem. 2023, 403, 134367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adamatzky, A.; Tarabella, G.; Phillips, N.; Chiolerio, A.; D’Angelo, P.; Nikolaidou, A.; Sirakoulis, G.C. 2023. Kombucha electronics: electronic circuits on kombucha mats. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Adamatzky, A. Electrical potential spiking of kombucha zoogleal mats: A symbiotic community of bacteria and yeasts. Bioelectricity 2023, 5, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esaker, M.; Hamza, O.; Elliott, D. Monitoring the bio-self-healing performance of cement mortar incubated within soil and water using electrical resistivity. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 393, 132109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muñoz-Rodríguez, D.; Bourqqia-Ramzi, M.; García-Esteban, M.T.; Murciano-Cespedosa, A.; Vian, A.; Lombardo-Hernández, J.; García-Pérez, P.; Conejero, F.; Mateos González, Á.; Geuna, S.; Herrera-Rincon, C. Bioelectrical State of Bacteria Is Linked to Growth Dynamics and Response to Neurotransmitters: Perspectives for the Investigation of the Microbiota–Brain Axis. Int. J. of Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peng, K.; Koubaa, M.; Bals, O.; Vorobiev, E. Recent insights in the impact of emerging technologies on lactic acid bacteria: A review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ganzorig, B.; Zayabaatar, E.; Pham, M.T.; Marito, S.; Huang, C.-M.; Lee, Y.-H. Lactobacillus plantarum Generate Electricity through Flavin Mononucleotide-Mediated Extracellular Electron Transfer to Upregulate Epithelial Type I Collagen Expression and Thereby Promote Microbial Adhesion to Intestine. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moysidou, C.M.; van Niekerk, D.C.; Stoeger, V.; Pitsalidis, C.; Draper, L.A.; Withers, A.M.; Hughes, K.; McCoy, R.; Acharya, R.; Hill, C.; and Owens, R.M. Modelling Human Gut-Microbiome Interactions in a 3D Bioelectronic Platform. Small Sci. 2024, 2300349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Yu, X.L.; Li, Y.W.; Han, W.; Yu, P.F.; Yeung, K.L.; Mo, C.H.; Zhou, S.Q. Investigating the electron shuttling characteristics of resazurin in enhancing bio-electricity generation in microbial fuel cell. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 428, 130924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Mao, L.; Qi, F.; Li, X.; Ullah, M.W.; Zhao, M.; Shi, Z.; Yang, G. Synergistic effect of highly aligned bacterial cellulose/gelatin membranes and electrical stimulation on directional cell migration for accelerated wound healing. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 424, 130563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yalcin, S.E.; O’Brien, J.P.; Gu, Y.; Reiss, K.; Yi, S.M.; Jain, R.; Srikanth, V.; Dahl, P.J.; Huynh, W.; Vu, D.; Acharya, A. Electric field stimulates production of highly conductive microbial OmcZ nanowires. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16, 1136–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Elhadad, A.; Liu, L.; Choi, S. Plug-and-play modular biobatteries with microbial consortia. J. Power Sources 2022, 535, 231487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, F.; Su, Y.; Wang, J.; Romanova, S.; DiMaio, D.J.; Xie, J.; Zhao, S. A highly efficacious electrical biofilm treatment system for combating chronic wound bacterial infections. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2208069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taira, H.; Yaga, M.; Nakasone, S.; Nishida, K.; Yamashiro, T. Significant removal of bacterial biofilm induced by multiple-Short ranges of electric interventions. J. Orthop. Sci. 2024, 29, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emanuel, E.; Dubrovin, I.; Hanya, E.; Pinhasi, G.A.; Pogreb, R.; Cahan, R. Eradication of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Pulsed Electric Field Treatments. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Obileke, K.; Onyeaka, H.; Meyer, E.L.; Nwokolo, N. Microbial fuel cells, a renewable energy technology for bio-electricity generation: A mini-review. Electrochem. Comm. 2021, 125, 107003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, R.K.; Shetti, N.P.; Reddy, K.R.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Sustainable energy from waste organic matters via efficient microbial processes. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 722, 137927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ławniczak, Ł.; Woźniak-Karczewska, M.; Loibner, A.P.; Heipieper, H.J.; Chrzanowski, Ł. Microbial Degradation of Hydrocarbons—Basic Principles for Bioremediation: A Review. Molecules 2020, 25, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, L.; Wu, C.; Zhi, Q.; Zhang, F.; Song, B.; Guan, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, R.; Fan, B. 2023. Multifunctional SiC aerogel reinforced with nanofibers and nanowires for high-efficiency electromagnetic wave absorption. Chem. Engineer. J. 2023, 467, 143518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simoska, O.; Gaffney, E.M.; Minteer, S.D.; Franzetti, A.; Cristiani, P.; Grattieri, M.; Santoro, C. Recent trends and advances in microbial electrochemical sensing technologies: An overview. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021, 30, 100762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Song, J.; Yan, W.; Li, T.; Li, R.; Wang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Q. Regulation of rhizospheric microbial network to enhance plant growth and resist pollutants: Unignorable weak electric field. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 855, 158888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.; Oh, M.M. Electric field: a new environmental factor for controlling plant growth and development in agriculture. Hort. Environ. Biotech. 2023, 64, 955–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- England, S.J.; Robert, D. The ecology of electricity and electroreception. Biol. Rev. 2022, 97, 383–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, D.; Oh, M.M. Vertical and horizontal electric fields stimulate growth and physiological responses in lettuce. Hort. Environ. Biotech. 2023, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sturgeon, W. An Account of Some Experiments on the Electro-Culture of Farm Crops. Abstracts of the Papers Communicated to the Royal Society of London 1846, 5 (1843 - 1850), 600. https://www.jstor. 18 May 1109. [Google Scholar]
- Nehru, S.S. New Methods in Electro-Culture. J. R. Soc. Arts 1934, 82, 231–257. [Google Scholar]
- Taoka, A.; Eguchi, Y.; Shimoshige, R.; Fukumori, Y. Recent advances in studies on magnetosome-associated proteins composing the bacterial geomagnetic sensor organelle. Microbiol. Immunol. 2023, 67, 228–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Natan, E.; Fitak, R.R.; Werber, Y.; Vortman, Y. Symbiotic magnetic sensing: raising evidence and beyond. Philos. Trans, R. Soc. B 2020, 375, 20190595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chevrier, D.M.; Juhin, A.; Menguy, N.; Bolzoni, R.; Soto-Rodriguez, P.E.; Kojadinovic-Sirinelli, M.; Paterson, G.A.; Belkhou, R.; Williams, W.; Skouri-Panet, F.; Kosta, A. Collective magnetotaxis of microbial holobionts is optimized by the three-dimensional organization and magnetic properties of ectosymbionts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2023, 120, e2216975120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, W.; Bazylinski, D.A.; Xiao, T.; Wu, L.F.; Pan, Y. Life with compass: diversity and biogeography of magnetotactic bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 2646–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zieliński, M.; Zielińska, M.; Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, A.; Rusanowska, P.; Dębowski, M. Effect of static magnetic field on microbial community during anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 323, 124600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, F.D.; Schüler, D.; Pfeiffer, D. A compass to boost navigation: cell biology of bacterial magnetotaxis. J. Bacteriol. 2020, 202, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simon, R.A.; Ranasinghe, P.D.; Barazanji, N.; Jungeström, M.B.; Xu, J.; Bednarska, O.; Serrander, L.; Engström, M.; Bazylinski, D.A.; Keita, Å.V.; and Walter, S. Magnetotactic bacteria from the human gut microbiome associated with orientation and navigation regions of the brain. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2021, 39, 2044–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, W.; Kirschvink, J.L.; Paterson, G.A.; Bazylinski, D.A.; Pan, Y. On the origin of microbial magnetoreception. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, W.; Zhang, W.; Paterson, G.A.; Zhu, Q.; Zhao, X.; Knight, R.; Bazylinski, D.A.; Roberts, A.P.; Pan, Y. 2020. Expanding magnetic organelle biogenesis in the domain Bacteria. Microbiome 2020, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, W.; Han, Y.; Shao, D.; Han, C.; Tian, Y.; Huang, Q. Effects of ultra-strong static magnetic field on the gut microbiota of humans and mice. Bioelectromagnetics 2023, 44, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, S.; Jin, Y.; Yang, N.; Wei, L.; Xu, D.; Xu, X. Improving microbial production of value-added products through the intervention of magnetic fields. Bioresour. Tech. 2024, 393, 130087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mayyahi, R.B.; Park, S.G.; Jadhav, D.A.; Hussien, M.; Mohamed, H.O.; Castaño, P.; Al-Qaradawi, S.Y.; Chae, K.J. Unraveling the influence of magnetic field on microbial and electrogenic activities in bioelectrochemical systems: A comprehensive review. Fuel 2023, 331, 125889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Azam, S.R.; Guo, Y.; Liu, D.; Ma, H. Germicidal efficacy of the pulsed magnetic field against pathogens and spoilage microorganisms in food processing: An overview. Food Control 2022, 136, 108496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, R.; Bai, J.; Zhu, K.; Benzerara, K.; Menguy, N.; Zhao, X.; Roberts, A.P.; Pan, Y.; Li, J. Key gene networks that control magnetosome biomineralization in magnetotactic bacteria. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2023, 10, nwac238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Liu, T.; Zhao, D.; Sun, X.; Xing, W.; Zhang, S.; Yan, L. External magnetic field have significant effects on diversity of magnetotactic bacteria in sediments from Yangtze River, Chagan Lake and Zhalong Wetland in China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 266, 115604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wenhao, H.; Nianzhao, W.; Jihuai, H.; Kun, Y.; Fengyun, M.; Huimei, T.; Yanping, W. The rhizosphere soil properties and bacteria community of poplar are affected by magnetic field under salt condition. Rhizosphere 2023, 27, 100747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gandhi, O.P. Electromagnetic fields: human safety issues. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2002, 4, 211–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, S.; Kapoor, N. Health implications of electromagnetic fields, mechanisms of action, and research needs. Adv. Biol. 2014, 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamedani, B.G.; Goliaei, B.; Shariatpanahi, S.P.; Nezamtaheri, M. An overview of the biological effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields combined with ionizing radiation. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2022, 172, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, C.; Muhammad, T.; Zhou, B.; Zhou, Y.; Song, P.; Li, Y. Using electromagnetic fields to inhibit biofouling and scaling in biogas slurry drip irrigation emitters. J.Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costa, J.M.; Marra, F. Advances in Food Processing Through Radio Frequency Technology: Applications in Pest Control, Microbial and Enzymatic Inactivation. Food Eng. Rev. 2024, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tai, Y.K.; Ng, C.; Purnamawati, K.; Lye Yee Yap, J.; Yin, J.N.; Wong, C.; Patel, B.K.; Soong, P.L.; Pelczar, P.; Fröhlich, J.; Beyer, C. Magnetic fields modulate metabolism and gut microbiome in correlation withPgc-1 alpha expression: Follow-up to an in vitro magnetic mitohormetic study. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 11143–11167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schuermann, D.; Mevissen, M. Manmade Electromagnetic Fields and Oxidative Stress—Biological Effects and Consequences for Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, X.; Zhou, G.; Lin, J.; Qin, T.; Du, J.; Guo, L.; Lai, P.; Jing, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Ding, G. Effects of radiofrequency field from 5G communication on fecal microbiome and metabolome profiles in mice. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 3571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Falkowski, P.G.; Fenchel, T.; Delong, E.F. The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles. Science 2008, 320, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rousk, J.; Bengtson, P. Microbial regulation of global biogeochemical cycles. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 86415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Baracaldo, P.; Bianchini, G.; Wilson, J.D.; Knoll, A.H. Cyanobacteria and biogeochemical cycles through Earth history. Trends Microbiol. 2022, 30, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamilton, D. Why we need germs. The Ecologist 2001, 31, S46. [Google Scholar]
- Blaser, M. Missing microbes: how killing bacteria creates modern plagues. 2014 Henry Holt and Co. 288pp.
- Finlay, B.B.; Amato, K.R.; Azad, M.; Blaser, M.J.; Bosch, T.C.G.; Chu, H.; Dominguez-Bello, M.G.; Ehrlich, S.D.; Elinav, E.; Geva-Zatorsky, N.; et al. The hygiene hypothesis, the COVID pandemic, and consequences for the human microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2021, 118, e2010217118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dietert, R.R. Microbiome First Medicine in Health and Safety. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dietert, R.R. Microbiome First Approaches to Rescue Public Health and Reduce Human Suffering. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guzzetta, K.E.; Cryan, J.F.; and O’Leary, O.F. 2022. Microbiota-gut-brain axis regulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Brain Plast. 2022, 8, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujisaka, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Tobe, K. 2023. The gut microbiome: A core regulator of metabolism. J. Endocrinol. 2023, 256, e220111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wickramasinghe, K.; Mathers, J.C.; Wopereis, S. ; Marsman. D.S.; Griffiths, J.C. From lifespan to healthspan: the role of nutrition in healthy ageing. J. Nutr. Sci. 2020, 9, e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dietert, R.R. Dietary Approaches from Moms, Farms, and Nature to Overcome Chronic Diseases and the Pharmacracy. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Inherent Microbial Properties for a Sustainble Future [Citations] |
Description |
|---|---|
| The Microbiome Commons [25,26,27] |
The extensive diversity of Earth’s prokaryotes has presented challenges particularly as emerging technologies have afforded different ways of exchanging, researching, analyzing and classifying microbes. Numerous investigators stressed the significance of a microbial commons approach to future microbiology and the need for greater attention and focus to protect our microbial resources. |
| Moving Beyond the Antibiocene [28] |
The researcher draws upon the microbial commons concepts and eight decades of antimicrobial-fueled living (the Antibiocene) to avocate for a strategies to: 1) preserve the microbial commons and 2) envision “eubiotic governance.“ |
| Electrified Micobial Communities [29,30] |
The researchers describe how specific microbes can use their inherent electrical and magenetic capabilities to both create and then share electricity among different microbial species. In effect, electrified communities relying on minerals and fundamental microbial properties are sufficient for naturally electrified communities. |
| Living Electronics [31,32] |
The researchers review the ultilization of and importance of microbes in bioelectronics, synthetic biology and electromicrobiology to produce biohybrid devices. Researchers also suggest that bacteria can power all sensing displays with sustainability. |
| Regenerative Architecture [33] |
The researcher extends the “microbial commons“ concept to argue the importance of moving beyond controlling microbes for new technology and, instead, restoring microbial ecology within sustainable cities and architechture. |
| Restorative Ecology [34] |
This review stresses that soil microbial community health is both a driver of and a critical indicator of ecological community status. The take home message is that a focus on microbial communities and their metabolism and interaction with plants is necessary to repair degraded ecosystems. |
| Regenerative Agriculture [35] |
This review posits that microbial function is critical to increase soil biodiversity as a key component of regenerative agriculture. The author also cites the benefits of microbial diversity as a driver of increased soil resistance and resiliency to disturbances. |
| The Internet of Microbes [36,37] |
Researchers have focused on the novel communication and sharing functions of microbes spread across virtually all of Earth’s ecological niches to illustrate that human and other holobionts tap this network to gain information originating from not only inside but also outside of the human body. Capacities such as communicating at-a-distance is connected to the internet of microbes. |
| Embodying the Microbiome [38,39,40] |
Various researchers explored the embodiment of the human microbiome via the practice of dance, meditation, and other contemplative exercises. A variety of outcomes were seen among the studies: shifts in awareness including informational insights, shifts in psychological/ emotional states, and specific physical experiences. These contemplative and other practices can serve as tools to connect with the microbial part of the human holobiont. |
| Microbes Provide Our Social Brain [41] |
These researchers describe the fundamental significance of microbes as the conduit through which human and other holobionts embody a social brain and display social behaviors. |
| Microbes and Spirituality [42,43,44,45,46] |
Several researchers have emphasized the importance of microbes in a wide range of spiritual practices. Human holobiont spirituality is microbe-inclusive and sometimes, microbe-centered. |
| Promotion of Peace [47] |
These researchers describe the benefits when microbes are used for the promotion of goods and services contributing to peace as opposed to bioweapons contributing to war. |
| Food Revolution [48] |
These researchers present a comprehensive view of how and why microbes are the solution to converting unsustainable food production to a fully-sustainble future. |
| Biocivilizations [49] |
The “Biocivilizations“ view of lifeforms on Earth turns many historic views on their head. It presents compelling evidence that humans were preceeded by and will long be followed by micobes. It also argues that as communicators, we have thus far functioned primarily as “supporting actors“across the theater of life. |
| Magnetotactic Bacteria (MTB)-Based Micromotors [50] |
Drug delivery including cancer therapy using magnetic bacteria is one of the many technologies drawing upon the array of special bacterial functions to benefit precision medicine. |
| Biochar as an Ecological Asset [51] |
Beneficial circular economy and sustainable environment are discussed as major benefits arising from microbial fuel cell waste known as biochar. Biochar offers significant opportunities for restorative ecology as a result of energy production. |
| Experimental Studies and Reviews [Citations(s)] |
Experimental Approach [not applicable (NA) for Reviews] |
Key Experimental Findings/ Review Conclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Studies on Kombucha mats as electronic and/or computing devices [79,80] |
The researchers demonstrated that Kombucha mats have special properties that allow them to be converted into wearable electronics by exploring different technologies for manufacturing kombucha based PCBs: aerosol jet printing of PODOT:PSS as well as 3D printing of TPU and metal-polymer composite, adding ink with conductive filler and laser cutting. |
The researchers demonstrated the feasibility of constructing electrical circuits within cured mats. They concluded that the Kombucha-based approaches offered advantages in being lighter, less expensive, and more flexible than conventional electronic systems. They also discussed the benefits regarding sustainability, biocompatibility, customizability, breathability and moisture management. |
| Study of electrical resistivity as a measure of effective bacterial self-healing concrete [Esaker et al. 2023 81] |
To find effective in situ measures of effectiveness of bacterial self-healing concrete |
Concrete status beneath soil can be challenging to easily evaluate. Electrical resistivity was found to be a useful measure of the effectiveness of bacterial (Bacillus subtilis) driven self-healing in concrete beneath soil level. |
| Gut-brain axis regulation [82] |
Bioelectric state alterations of specific microbiota during response to neurotransmitters were examined in Bacillus subtilis Marburg ATCC 6051 and Limosilactobacillus reuteri F275 ATCC 23272. Glutamate and GABA were used as neurotransmitters with growth rate, depolarization, and Vmem (a fluorescent reporter gene) evaluated during the exponential growth phase. |
The study found that: 1) when cells are less energized (membrane depolarization), cell proliferation can increase and 2) bidirectional communication occurs between the bacteria and the brain. Using B. subtilis, depolarization (quantitated with the Vmem reporter gene) increased as did cell proliferation. Both bacteria responded to the two neurotransmitters with Vmem changes. Since L. reuteri is a psychoactive bacteria, this could have functional gut-brain implications. |
| Review of the impact of technologies including electrical fields on lactic acid bacteria [83] |
NA | An emphasis is placed on the capacity of the technology to either enhance growth and/or functions of the bacteria or destroy the bacteria depending upon field strength/conditions. |
| Review of GABA and bacterial signaling [52] |
NA | This review covers the range of GABA-driven signaling not only connecting bacteria within their own communities but also the regulation of neurological function in humans via interkingdom signaling. |
| Investigation of the electrogenic mechanisms through which Lactobacillus plantarum affects intestinal epithelium and promotes intestinal adhesion [84] |
Lactobacillus plantarum from Mongolian fermented Airag (designated L. planetarium MA) was investigated for gene expression changes, electrical generation, and cecal adhesion properties. |
Key findings were: 1) electrical activity of L. plantarum MA was dependent on type II NADH-quinone oxidoreductase and 2) was found to be conducted through flavin mononucleotide (FMN)-based extracellular electron transfer. 3) A significant effect was increased adherence by causing increased type 1 collagen expression among intestinal epithelial cells. |
| Study using a 3-D bioelectric platform (the e-transmembrane) to model host intestine-microbe cross-talk [85] |
A 3-D stratified tissue human intestine model was used in conjunction with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to monitor the effects of various postbiotics and live bacteria on integrity of the intestinal barrier. The electrical readout was an effective measure of gut barrier status. |
The electronic transmembrane model facilitated real-time, in-line sensing of microbe-host barrier interactions. Impedance data could provide a clear evaluation of tissue integrity and changes in barrier function in response to postbiotics and live bacteria with different pro- or anti-inflammation-promoting properties. |
| Chemically-elevated bioelectric production from bacteria [86] |
The phenoxazine electron-shuttling mediator, resazurin, was evaluated for its capacity to enhance electron transport at the anode electrode of a microbial fuel cell. |
The major findings were that resazurin: 1) increased the microbial fuel cell power density fourfold, 2) increased electron conduction with a reduction in electrode resistance and 3) favored growth of electro-active microbial biofilm through increased biocompatibility. |
| Study using electric fields and highly aligned bacterial cellulose/gelatin membranes to guide cell migration. [87] |
The focus was on establishing a highly-aligned bacterial cellulose/gelatin membrane that was combined with electrical stimulation to better recruit cells to an area in need of wound healing. In vivo wound healing was examined in mice. |
A key finding was that wound healing was facilitated by accelerating wound closure, increasing granulation tissue thickness, collagen deposition, angiogenesis, and by upregulating specific gene expression. |
| Study of electric field stimulation of bacterial production of cytochrome OmcZ nanowires with higher conductivity [88] |
Enhancing bacterial electrical conductivity of Geobacter sulfurreducens via nanowires was studied using a protocol to evaluate the difference in nanowire type, confirmation changes and electrical carrying capacity under different conditions. |
Key finding: electrical stimulation of biofilms under specific pH ranges resulted in a change in nanowires (OmcZ instead of OmcS nanowires) with a 1,000 fold greater conductivity and increased nanowire stiffness than are generally found in nature. |
| Three bacteria consortium plug-and-play biobatteries [89] |
Comparisons of single, double and tripled multilayer consortiums of biobatteries were constructed using Shewanella oneidensis MR1, Bacillus subtilis, and Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803) |
The 3-D consortium of bacteria had excellent self-sustaining properties and was able to power supply for real-world wireless sensor network applications such as powering a telemetry system. |
| Optimization of an electrical field methodology to eliminate bacterial biofilm inhibition of wound healing. [90] |
The study examined the effects of a new high-intensity current application (hydrogel circuit related) compared to conventional devices targeting methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in a diabetic mice wound healing model. |
The safer high intensity current produced two primary beneficial effects: enhanced bacterial debridement and greater antibiotic effectiveness. |
| The study examined more effective removal of biofilms on titanium structures as an orthopedic application. [91] |
The study examined the effects of multiple short range, one-minute duration electrical fields on Staphylococcus aureus biofilms on titanium rings. |
Multiple short duration electric applications proved effective in biofilm removal and would help to avoid what previously was necessary prolonged electrical field exposures. |
| Study using local electric fields to treat bacterial contamination of drinking water [77] |
The researchers used Staphylococcus epidermidis as a model to test the effectiveness of locally enhanced electric field treatment employing nanosecond electric pulses. Different intensities and number of pulses were compared for effectiveness. |
The study found that one 20 nanosecond pulse at 55 kV cm−1 resulted in a 26.6% inactivation of bacteria by electroporation while ten pulses at 40 kV cm−1 produced 95.1% inactivation of bacteria. The study has relevance for drinking water safety |
| Study demonstrating the utility of using pulsed electric field treatments for the eradication of Saccharomyces cerevisia [92] |
The study examined the effects of up to four cycles of pulsed electric field (PEF) treatments under a variety of conditions such as with different media and with or without preservatives. Cell eradication and membrane resealing were the major endpoints evaluated. |
Major findings were that: 1) the type of media and its electrical conductivity influenced yeast destruction vs. recovery and 2) specific preservatives affected the relationship between media electrical conductivity and yeast total destruction (damage without membrane repair). |
| Experimental Studies and Reviews [Citation] |
Experimental Approach [not applicable (NA) for Reviews] |
Key Experimental Findings/ Review Conclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Review article considering the likely origins of magnetoreception among microbes [111] |
NA | The researchers present an exaptation model (where features acquire new functions) for early life magnetosome (MTB) development. They conclude that production of magnetosomes was a response for the need of an iron-oxide nanozyme with peroxidase activity to protect against oxidative damage. |
| Research study on the extent of MTB distribution [112] |
The study used metagenomic analysis plus the reconstruction of metagenome-assembled MTB genomes from across highly divergent environments to examine the extent of MTB occurrence among bacteria. |
The study found that MTBs were far more common among bacterial phyla than previously thought. Thirteen bacterial phyla were found to include MTB genomes with six phyla not previously known to possess MTBs. |
| Research article on the effects of ultra strong static magnetic fields on human and mouse gut microbiota [113] |
A 16 T static magnetic field was used to examine the changes in the structure and composition of human and mouse gut microbiota. |
Exposure to the ultra strong magnetic field was found to significantly reduce the prevalence of six mouse gut microbiome bacterial genera and four human bacterial genera (Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Romboutsia, and Streptococcus). Mice and humans differed in their response. Given the increasing prevalence of potential exposure to these fields, the researchers stressed the need to protect the microbiome. |
| Review article suggesting that magnetic fields can alter biochemical processes in microbial populations affecting a range of processes (e.g., nutrient transport across membranes, electron transfer during photosynthesis and respiration, enzyme activity and gene expression) and functions (e.g., increased fermentation, growth rate, biomass) [114] |
NA | The focus of this review is on magnetic field-assisted fermentation processes and the more efficient production of value-added products. A major finding was that device configuration could impact the magnetic field benefits and that needed to be part of the overall design considerations. |
| Review article emphasizing the impact of magnetic fields on microbial fuel cells and wastewater treatment application and the variables that can influence effective management [115] |
NA | Magnetic fields affect the growth and functional activity of microbes in microbial fuel cells. These researchers focused on the mechanisms through which these effects occur. Changes in enzymatic activity and management of radical pairs were identified as key factors connected to functional status and potential benefits. |
| This review covers the germicidal capacities of pulsed magnetic fields. In this case, the applications are considered relative to food preservation. [116] |
NA | The review emphasizes the benefits of non-thermal pulsed magnetic field treatment of food as an effective sterilization technique while retaining food quality. |
| Research study involving the identification of specific genes and gene networks that are important for MTB crystal formation and biomineralization. [117] |
The protocol involved the identification of specific genes encoding and/or regulating each step in MTB crystal formation and biomineralization among several phyla. |
The research paper is important in associating genes with individual features such as crystal morphology, MTB chain assembly, and each step in the biomineralization process. |
| Research study showing that human gut microbiota include magnetotactic bacteria [110] |
Metagenomic analysis of the gut microbiota from 34 healthy female adults was used to test for MTB. MRI was used for brain imaging in the subjects. |
Researchers found seven MTB bacteria among the human gut microbiome (Magnetococcus marinus, Magnetospira sp. QH-2, Magnetospirillum magneticum , Magnetospirillum sp. ME-1, Magnetospirillum sp. XM-1, Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense , and Desulfovibrio magneticus. The presence of the MTB in the gut was found to be associated with grey matter volume in magnetite-rich brain regions related to orientation and navigation. |
| Research study investigating the effects of external magnetic fields on MTB in China river sediments [118] |
This research study examined the contribution of the external magnetostatic field to the diversity of MTB in various freshwater sediments in China. |
Because MTB can rapidly relocate to optimal habitats by magnetotaxis, this can influence iron biogeochemical cycling. These researchers found significant changes in richness and diversity related to magnetic field intensity and/or duration of exposure. However, the changes in MTB populations were not necessarily the same across the three freshwater sampling locations. |
| Research study examining the effects of eternal magnetic fields on rhizosphere bacteria [119] |
Popular seedling growth, the rhizosphere and soil microbes were evaluated under conditions of a static magnetic field. The field was created using framing ferrite permanent magnets Exposure was ~15 mT. Saline (3%) conditions were included in some trials. |
Magnetic field exposures had several reported beneficial effects. They increased dominant bacteria phyla (Actinobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, and Proteobacteria), rhizosphere soil contents of extracellular polymeric substances, the ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), amorphous iron oxide (Feo) and available phosphorus (AP) contents in the soil, as well as soil urease and acid phosphatase activity. |
| Review of the symbiotic magnetic sensing hypothesis [105] |
NA | This review considers the pros and cons to the concept that MTB provide the underlying basis for magnetic sensing in animals. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).