Submitted:
17 May 2024
Posted:
20 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Material
2.2. Preparation of the Gelatin Filmogenic Solution
2.3. Preparation and Weighing of Camu-Camu Extract
2.4. Incorporation of the Extract into the Matrix
2.5. Determination of Thickness
2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
2.7. Quantification of Total Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Capacity
2.8. Water Vapor Permeability (WVP)
2.9. Soil Biodegradation
2.10. Morphological Analysis
2.11. Seed Germination in the Presence of Degraded Film
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Gelatin Films (2%) Incorporated with Glycerin and Camu-Camu Residue
3.3. Film Thickness
3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
3.5. Quantification of Antioxidant Capacity
3.6. Water Vapor Permeability (WVP)
3.7. Biodegradation of Samples
3.8. Seeds Germinated with the Presence of Degraded Films
4. Conclusion
Authors’ contributions
Declaration of competing interest
Aknowledgements
Declaration of generative AI in scientific writing
References
- BETT, K.L.; INGRAM, D.A.; GRIMM, C.C.; LLOYD, S.W.; SPANIER, A.M.; MILLER, J.M.; GROSS, K.C.; BALDWIN, E.A.; VINYARD, B.T. FLAVOR OF FRESH-CUT GALA APPLES IN BARRIER FILM PACKAGING AS AFFECTED BY STORAGE TIME. J Food Qual 2001, 24, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nazmi, N.N.; Isa, M.I.N.; Sarbon, N.M. Preparation and Characterization of Chicken Skin Gelatin/CMC Composite Film as Compared to Bovine Gelatin Film. Food Biosci 2017, 19, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandika, P.; Ko, S.-C.; Jung, W.-K. Marine-Derived Biological Macromolecule-Based Biomaterials for Wound Healing and Skin Tissue Regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol 2015, 77, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, N.; Unnithan, A.R.; Joshi, M.K.; Tiwari, A.P.; Hong, S.T.; Park, C.-H.; Kim, C.S. Electrospun Bioactive Poly (ɛ-Caprolactone)–Cellulose Acetate–Dextran Antibacterial Composite Mats for Wound Dressing Applications. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2015, 469, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Momoh, F.U.; Boateng, J.S.; Richardson, S.C.W.; Chowdhry, B.Z.; Mitchell, J.C. Development and Functional Characterization of Alginate Dressing as Potential Protein Delivery System for Wound Healing. Int J Biol Macromol 2015, 81, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- V, A.K.; Hasan, M.; Mangaraj, S.; M, P.; Verma, D.K.; Srivastav, P.P. Trends in Edible Packaging Films and Its Prospective Future in Food: A Review. Applied Food Research 2022, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zahran, M.K.; Ahmed, H.B.; El-Rafie, M.H. Surface Modification of Cotton Fabrics for Antibacterial Application by Coating with AgNPs–Alginate Composite. Carbohydr Polym 2014, 108, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eweis, M.; Elkholy, S.S.; Elsabee, M.Z. Antifungal Efficacy of Chitosan and Its Thiourea Derivatives upon the Growth of Some Sugar-Beet Pathogens. Int J Biol Macromol 2006, 38, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Forato, L.A.; Yushmanov, V.E.; Colnago, L.A. Interaction of Two Prolamins with 1- 13 C Oleic Acid by 13 C NMR. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 7121–7126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Brito Nogueira, T.B.; da Silva, T.P.M.; de Araújo Luiz, D.; de Andrade, C.J.; de Andrade, L.M.; Ferreira, M.S.L.; Fai, A.E.C. Fruits and Vegetable-Processing Waste: A Case Study in Two Markets at Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2020, 27, 18530–18540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rangaraj, V.M.; Rambabu, K.; Banat, F.; Mittal, V. Effect of Date Fruit Waste Extract as an Antioxidant Additive on the Properties of Active Gelatin Films. Food Chem 2021, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Nóbrega Santos, E.; Cesar de Albuquerque Sousa, T.; Cassiano de Santana Neto, D.; Brandão Grisi, C.V.; Cardoso da Silva Ferreira, V.; Pereira da Silva, F.A. Edible Active Film Based on Gelatin and Malpighia Emarginata Waste Extract to Inhibit Lipid and Protein Oxidation in Beef Patties. LWT 2022, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE FRUTICULTURA A CULTURA DE CAMU-CAMU NO BRASIL.
- Ju, A.; Song, K. Bin Development of Teff Starch Films Containing Camu-Camu (Myrciaria Dubia Mc. Vaugh) Extract as an Antioxidant Packaging Material. Ind Crops Prod 2019, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nedorostova, L.; Kloucek, P.; Kokoska, L.; Stolcova, M.; Pulkrabek, J. Antimicrobial Properties of Selected Essential Oils in Vapour Phase against Foodborne Bacteria. Food Control 2009, 20, 157–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mariod, A.; Fadul, H. Review: Gelatin, Source, Extraction and Industrial Applications. ACTA Scientiarum Polonorum Technol. Aliment. 2013, 12, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
- Qiao, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Yao, J. Influence of Salts in the Hofmeister Series on the Physical Gelation Behavior of Gelatin in Aqueous Solutions. Food Hydrocoll 2021, 110, 106150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunes, J.C.; Melo, P.T.S.; Lorevice, M.V.; Aouada, F.A.; de Moura, M.R. Effect of Green Tea Extract on Gelatin-Based Films Incorporated with Lemon Essential Oil. J Food Sci Technol 2021, 58, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saranti, T.F. da S.; Melo, P.T.S.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Aouada, F.A.; de Moura, M.R. Performance of Gelatin Films Reinforced with Cloisite Na+ and Black Pepper Essential Oil Loaded Nanoemulsion. Polymers (Basel) 2021, 13, 4298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vital, A.C.P.; Guerrero, A.; Monteschio, J. de O.; Valero, M.V.; Carvalho, C.B.; de Abreu Filho, B.A.; Madrona, G.S.; do Prado, I.N. Effect of Edible and Active Coating (with Rosemary and Oregano Essential Oils) on Beef Characteristics and Consumer Acceptability. In PLOS ONE; Chamani, J., Ed.; 2016; Vol. 11, p. e0160535.
- Singleton, V.L.; Rossi, J.A. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic-Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents. Am J Enol Vitic 1965, 16, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thaipong, K.; Boonprakob, U.; Crosby, K.; Cisneros-Zevallos, L.; Hawkins Byrne, D. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC Assays for Estimating Antioxidant Activity from Guava Fruit Extracts. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 2006, 19, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant Activity Applying an Improved ABTS Radical Cation Decolorization Assay. Free Radic Biol Med 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a Measure of “Antioxidant Power”: The FRAP Assay. Anal Biochem 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ASTM - Standard Test Method for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials; PA: ASTM: Philadelphia, USA, 1980.
- McHUGH, T.H.; AVENA-BUSTILLOS, R.; KROCHTA, J.M. Hydrophilic Edible Films: Modified Procedure for Water Vapor Permeability and Explanation of Thickness Effects. J Food Sci 1993, 58, 899–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavoni, J.M.F.; Luchese, C.L.; Tessaro, I.C. Impact of Acid Type for Chitosan Dissolution on the Characteristics and Biodegradability of Cornstarch/Chitosan Based Films. Int J Biol Macromol 2019, 138, 693–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abe, M.M.; Branciforti, M.C.; Nallin Montagnolli, R.; Marin Morales, M.A.; Jacobus, A.P.; Brienzo, M. Production and Assessment of the Biodegradation and Ecotoxicity of Xylan- and Starch-Based Bioplastics. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 132290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harada, J.; de Souza, A.G.; de Macedo, J.R.N.; Rosa, D.S. Soil Culture: Influence of Different Natural Fillers Incorporated in Biodegradable Mulching Film. J Mol Liq 2019, 273, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porto, D.S.; de Faria, C.M.G.; Inada, N.M.; Frollini, E. Polyurethane Films Formation from Microcrystalline Cellulose as a Polyol and Cellulose Nanocrystals as Additive: Reactions Favored by the Low Viscosity of the Source of Isocyanate Groups Used. Int J Biol Macromol 2023, 236, 124035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezende Barbosa TURBIANI, F.; Guenter KIECKBUSCH, T. Propriedades Mecânicas e de Barreira de Filmes de Alginato de Sódio Reticulados Com Benzoato de Cálcio e/Ou Cloreto de Cálcio. Brazilian Journal of Food Technology 2011, 14, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Andrade, R.M.S. BIOACESSIBILIDADE, CAPACIDADE ANTIOXIDANTE E POTENCIAL PREBIÓTICO DE SUBPRODUTO DE FRUTAS E HORTALIÇAS. Doctoral thesis, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO: Rio de Janeiro, 2020.
- Chambi, H.N.M.; Grosso, C.R.F. Mechanical and Water Vapor Permeability Properties of Biodegradables Films Based on Methylcellulose, Glucomannan, Pectin and Gelatin. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos 2011, 31, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altiok, D.; Altiok, E.; Tihminlioglu, F. Physical, Antibacterial and Antioxidant Properties of Chitosan Films Incorporated with Thyme Oil for Potential Wound Healing Applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010, 21, 2227–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavoosi, G.; Rahmatollahi, A.; Mohammad Mahdi Dadfar, S.; Mohammadi Purfard, A. Effects of Essential Oil on the Water Binding Capacity, Physico-Mechanical Properties, Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Gelatin Films. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2014, 57, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



| Sample | Gelatin concentration | Residue concentration | Glycerin concentration | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% PURE | 2% Gelatin matrix | --- | 0.25g Glycerin | pH 5.24 |
| 35% PURE | 2% Gelatin matrix | --- | 0.35g Glycerin | pH 5.26 |
| Sample 1 | 2% Gelatin matrix | 0.25g residue | 0.25g Glycerin | pH 4.50 |
| Sample 2 | 2% Gelatin matrix | 0.5g residue | 0.25g Glycerin | pH 4.14 |
| Sample 3 | 2% Gelatin matrix | 0.25g residue | 0.35g Glycerin | pH 4.50 |
| Sample 4 | 2% Gelatin matrix | 0.5g residue | 0.35g Glycerin | pH 4.13 |
| Samples | DPPH (mg Trolox/g film) | FRAP (mg Trolox/g film) | ABTS (mg Trolox/g film) | Total phenolic compounds (mg EAG/g film) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample 3 | 2.44b ± 0.03 | 6.27b ± 0.10 | 0.51b ± 0.04 | 0.23b ± 0.04 |
| Sample 4 | 2.63ª ± 0.05 | 15.45ª ± 0.09 | 1.42ª ± 0.02 | 0.53ª ± 0.05 |
| 35% Pure | N.D.* | 0.37c ± 0.03 | N.D.* | N.D.* |
| Substrate | 35.07 ± 0.10 | 58.75 ± 0.02 | 49.79 ± 0.05 | 14.28 ± 0.08 |
| Samples | WVP (g-mm/kPa-h-m2) | Deviation % |
|---|---|---|
| 25% Pure | 1.711 | 0.1082 |
| 35% Pure | 1.146 | 0.0966 |
| Sample 3 | 2.720 | 0.0900 |
| Sample 4 | 2.712 | 0.0886 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).