Submitted:
11 May 2024
Posted:
13 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Results
3. Discussion
5. Conclusion
4. Materials and Methods
Supplementary Materials
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Organization, W.H. The public health impact of chemicals: knowns and unknowns. 2016, World Health Organization.
- Hou, L.; et al. Environmental chemical exposures and human epigenetics. International Journal of Epidemiology 2011, 41, 79–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Naidu, R.; et al. Chemical pollution: A growing peril and potential catastrophic risk to humanity. Environment International 2021, 156, 106616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baccarelli, A. and V. Bollati, Epigenetics and environmental chemicals. Curr Opin Pediatr 2009, 21, 243–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ruiz-Hernandez, A.; et al. Environmental chemicals and DNA methylation in adults: a systematic review of the epidemiologic evidence. Clin Epigenetics 2015, 7, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu, Y.; et al. Integrative analysis of omics summary data reveals putative mechanisms underlying complex traits. Nature Communications 2018, 9, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; et al. Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data. Nature Communications 2018, 9, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paul, K.C.; et al. Organophosphate pesticide exposure and differential genome-wide DNA methylation. Sci Total Environ 2018, 645, 1135–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.; et al. Exposure to Low Levels of Lead in Utero and Umbilical Cord Blood DNA Methylation in Project Viva: An Epigenome-Wide Association Study. Environ Health Perspect 2017, 125, 087019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yadav, D.K.; et al. Vitamin B(12) supplementation influences methylation of genes associated with Type 2 diabetes and its intermediate traits. Epigenomics 2018, 10, 71–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nuñez, J.K.; et al. Genome-wide programmable transcriptional memory by CRISPR-based epigenome editing. Cell 2021, 184, 2503–2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.M.; et al. Gα12/13 signaling in metabolic diseases. Experimental & Molecular Medicine 2020, 52, 896–910. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, T.H.; et al. Gα12 ablation exacerbates liver steatosis and obesity by suppressing USP22/SIRT1-regulated mitochondrial respiration. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 2018, 128, 5587–5602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Denis-Henriot, D.; et al. Mutant α-Subunit of the G Protein G12 Activates Proliferation and Inhibits Differentiation of 3T3-F442A Preadipocytes*. Endocrinology 1998, 139, 2892–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Y.; et al. Gestational Perfluoroalkyl Substance Exposure and DNA Methylation at Birth and 12 Years of Age: A Longitudinal Epigenome-Wide Association Study. Environ Health Perspect 2022, 130, 37005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hoorn, E.J.; et al. Pathogenesis of calcineurin inhibitor-induced hypertension. J Nephrol 2012, 25, 269–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Siffert, W. and R. Düsing, Sodium-Proton Exchange and Primary Hypertension. Hypertension 1995, 26, 649–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, L.; et al. GTP cyclohydrolase I phosphorylation and interaction with GTP cyclohydrolase feedback regulatory protein provide novel regulation of endothelial tetrahydrobiopterin and nitric oxide. Circ Res 2010, 106, 328–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lindholm, M.E.; et al. An integrative analysis reveals coordinated reprogramming of the epigenome and the transcriptome in human skeletal muscle after training. Epigenetics 2014, 9, 1557–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, H.; et al. Epigenomic and transcriptomic analyses define core cell types, genes and targetable mechanisms for kidney disease. Nature Genetics 2022, 54, 950–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; et al. Short- and intermediate-term exposure to ambient fine particulate elements and leukocyte epigenome-wide DNA methylation in older men: the Normative Aging Study. Environ Int 2022, 158, 106955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rallabandi, H.R.; et al. Research Trends in C-Terminal Domain Nuclear Envelope Phosphatase 1. Life (Basel) 2023, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fujiwara, A.; et al. LPIN1 is a new target gene for essential hypertension. J Hypertens, 2022, 40, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Edwards, J.R.; et al. Chromatin and sequence features that define the fine and gross structure of genomic methylation patterns. Genome Res 2010, 20, 972–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Niedzwiecki, M.M.; et al. The Exposome: Molecules to Populations. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 2019, 59, 107–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, M.; et al. EWAS Atlas: a curated knowledgebase of epigenome-wide association studies. Nucleic Acids Res 2019, 47, D983–d988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McRae, A.F.; et al. Identification of 55,000 Replicated DNA Methylation QTL. Sci Rep 2018, 8, 17605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hannon, E.; et al. An integrated genetic-epigenetic analysis of schizophrenia: evidence for co-localization of genetic associations and differential DNA methylation. Genome Biology 2016, 17, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Võsa, U.; et al. Large-scale cis- and trans-eQTL analyses identify thousands of genetic loci and polygenic scores that regulate blood gene expression. Nature Genetics 2021, 53, 1300–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





|
Trait (Source) |
CpG site | Lead SNP (A1 allele) |
Association* | Colocalization results | |||
| B | P | B | PSMR | PHEIDI | |||
| Body fat percentage (UKBB) |
cg23627948 | rs798549(C) | 0.01 | 1.3E-08 | 0.01 | 1.4E-08 | 0.04 |
| 1.41 | <2E-200 | ||||||
| DBP(UKBB) | cg21153102 | rs4924526(A) | 0.17 | 2.5E-23 | 0.18 | 8.0E-22 | 0.3 |
| 0.99 | <2E-200 | ||||||
| Kidney function (PMID: 31152163) |
cg05280698 | rs320881(G) | 0.003 | 2.9E-21 | 0.01 | 4.0E-17 | 0.04 |
| 0.59 | 2.1E-75 | ||||||
| SBP (UKBB) |
cg03186999 | rs402514(T) | -0.28 | 5.1E-19 | -0.45 | 4.6E-16 | 0.01 |
| 0.62 | 8.0E-86 | ||||||
| * It indicates the association of the lead SNP with the trait (first row of the cell) and the CpG site (second row of the cell). | |||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).