Submitted:
10 May 2024
Posted:
12 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
| Abbreviation | Expanded Form |
|---|---|
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| ANFIS | Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems |
| ANN | Artificial Neural Network |
| BN | Bayesian Networks |
| BPNN | Back Propagation Neural Networks |
| CapsNet | Capsule Network |
| CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
| CT | Current Transformer |
| DFT | Discrete Fourier Transform |
| DL | Deep Learning |
| DRNN | Deep Recurrent Neural Networks |
| DRL | Deep Reinforcement Learning |
| DSE | Differential Spectral Energy |
| DT | Decision Tree |
| DWT | Discrete Wavelet Transform |
| FBSC | Fractional Base Station Cooperation |
| FDC | Fault Detection and Classification |
| FLP | Fault Location Prediction |
| FRI | Fault Region Identification |
| FTC | Fault Type Classification |
| GFD | Global Fault Detector |
| GCNN | Graph Convolutional Neural Network |
| GNN | Graph Neural Networks |
| HIF | High Impedance Faults |
| HMM | Hidden Markov Model |
| HVDC | High-Voltage Direct Current |
| KMDD | K-Means Data Description |
| KNN | K-Nearest Neighbors |
| LSTM | Long Short-Term Memory |
| IPA | Instantaneous Phase Angles |
| ML | Machine Learning |
| MLP | Multi-Layer Perceptron |
| MODWT | Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform |
| NB | Naïve Bayes |
| PMU | PMU |
| PSCAD | Positive Sequence Current Angle Differences |
| PSCM | Positive Sequence Current Magnitude |
| PSVM | Positive Sequence Voltage Magnitude |
| R-CNN | Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network |
| RF | Random Forest |
| RNN | Recurrent Neural Networks |
| SAT-CNN | Self-attention Convolutional Neural Network |
| SDL | Sequential Deep Learning |
| SF | Sparce Filtering |
| SE | Spectral Energy |
| SOM | Self-Organizing Maps |
| SSD | Successive Signal Detection |
| SVM | Support Vector Machine |
| TF | Transfer Function |
| UPFC | Unified Power Flow Controller |
- To compare and critically assess the current methods for fault detection used in transmission line systems.
- To list the main obstacles and restrictions related to the existing techniques for transmission line fault detection and classification.
- To investigate current developments as well as new directions in transmission line systems fault detection technology.
- To evaluate the suitability and practicality of various fault detection techniques in actual transmission line situations.
- To make suggestions on possible areas for future research and advancements in transmission line fault detection techniques.
2. Methodology
2.1. Literature Search Strategy
- Inclusion Period: The search prioritizes studies published between 2019 and 2024 to capture the most recent developments. This timeframe ensures the review reflects the evolving landscape of fault detection technologies for transmission lines.
- Database Selection: The search adopts a broad perspective by systematically exploring a variety of databases. This includes industry-standard resources such as IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, ResearchGate (https://www.researchgate.net/), Scopus (www.scopus.com), Litmaps, alongside comprehensive platforms like Google Scholar. Additionally, relevant repositories are examined to uncover potentially valuable specialized research. A defined set of keywords is utilized to refine the search results and achieve a focused selection. These keywords encompass fundamental terms like "transmission line fault detection" and delve into specific methodologies like "impedance-based techniques" and "wavelet transform." Moreover, Boolean operators (AND, OR) are strategically employed to maintain a balance between comprehensiveness and specificity.
2.2. Establishing Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
-
Inclusion Criteria:
- ○
- Peer-reviewed articles, conference papers, and relevant reviews focusing on fault detection techniques for transmission lines are prioritized.
- ○
- Studies exploring a wide range of approaches are included, encompassing traditional techniques, advanced signal processing methods, applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence, and hybrid methodologies that combine these approaches. This ensures a thorough understanding of the current state-of-the-art.
-
Exclusion Criteria:
- ○
- Publications not in English are excluded to maintain consistency and facilitate clear analysis.
- ○
- Studies lacking clearly defined methodologies are excluded to ensure the review focuses on robust research and avoids potentially unreliable data.
2.3. Detailed Data Extraction Process
- Creation of a Comprehensive Extraction Grid: A detailed extraction grid is designed to streamline data extraction and ensure uniformity. This grid is formulated by analyzing recent, established checklists relevant to fault detection research. Additionally, a thorough review of 21 related studies identifies frequently reported data points. Utilizing this combined knowledge, a comprehensive extraction grid is constructed, encompassing all essential data elements.
- Thorough Information Extraction: Following the established extraction grid, relevant details are meticulously extracted from each selected study. These details include bibliographic information such as titles, authors, and publication years, as well as core research elements like the employed fault detection techniques, key findings of the study, and the specific system conditions evaluated.
- Documenting Accuracy Metrics and Limitations: To facilitate a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of various fault detection methods, reported accuracy rates and performance metrics are documented from each study. This enables a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches. Additionally, any limitations mentioned by the authors are identified and documented. Analyzing these limitations provides valuable insights into potential challenges and areas for future research endeavors.
2.4. Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Selected Studies
- Rigorous Study Selection: Clear and rigorous selection criteria, meticulously aligned with the overall research objectives, are established to ensure only the most relevant studies are included for analysis.
- Data Synthesis and Evaluation: Key findings from each selected study are carefully summarized, providing a concise overview of the research contributions. These summaries are then evaluated based on two crucial aspects: the specific fault detection techniques employed and the system conditions under which the techniques were tested. This allows for insights into the applicability and limitations of different approaches under varying circumstances.
- Comparative Analysis: A comprehensive comparative analysis is conducted, meticulously examining the reported accuracy, strengths, and limitations of different fault detection approaches. This comparative analysis provides a clear understanding of which methodologies excel in specific scenarios and identifies areas where certain approaches might fall short.
- Discussing Implications and Recommendations: The review delves into the broader implications of the findings, exploring how these advancements can potentially impact the field of fault detection for transmission lines. Furthermore, common trends and challenges identified throughout the analysis are highlighted. Based on these insights, the review provides well-considered recommendations for future research endeavors, paving the way for continued advancements.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Advanced Signal Processing Techniques:
| Ref | Literature | Technique Used | Effectiveness | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [17] | Phase angle-based fault detection and classification for protection of transmission lines - Kumar, B., Mohapatra, A., Chakrabarti, S., Kumar, A. (2021) |
|
|
|
| [18] | A critical fault detection analysis & fault time in a UPFC transmission line - Mishra, S., Tripathy, L. (2019) |
|
|
|
| [19] | Fault detection through discrete wavelet transform in overhead power transmission lines - Ahmed, N., Hashmani, A., Khokhar, S., Tuni, M., Faheem, M. (2023) |
|
|
|
| [20] | Fault Detection and Classification of Shunt Compensated Transmission Line Using Discrete Wavelet Transform and Naive Bayes Classifier - Aker, E., Othman, M., Veerasamy, V., Aris, I., Wahab, N., Hizam, H. (2020) |
|
|
|
| [21] | MODWT-based fault detection and classification scheme for cross-country and evolving faults - Ashok, V., Yadav, A., Abdelaziz, A. (2019) |
|
|
|
| [22] | Faults detection and classification of HVDC transmission lines of using discrete wavelet transform - Saleem, U., Arshad, U., Masood, B., Gul, T., Khan, W., Ellahi, M. (2018) |
|
|
|
| [23] | Transmission Line Fault Detection and Identification in an Interconnected Power Network using Phasor Measurement Units - Khan, A., Ullah, Q., Sarwar, M., Gul, S., Iqbal, N. (2018) |
|
|
|
3.2. Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Techniques:
| Ref | Literature | Algorithms Used | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [24] | Deep learning through LSTM classification and regression for transmission line fault detection, diagnosis and location in large-scale multi-machine power systems - Belagoune, S., Bali, N., Bakdi, A., Baadji, B., Atif, K. (2021) |
|
|
|
| [25] | A deep learning based intelligent approach in detection and classification of transmission line faults - Fahim, S., Sarker, S., Muyeen, S., Das, S., Kamwa I. (2021) |
|
|
|
| [26] | Self-attention convolutional neural network with time series imaging based feature extraction for transmission line fault detection and classification - Fahim, S., Sarker, Y., Sarker, S., Sheikh, M., Das, S. (2020) |
|
|
|
| [27] | End to end machine learning for fault detection and classification in power transmission lines - Rafique, F., Fu, L., Mai, R. (2021) | ‘End to end’ ML model employing LSTM |
|
|
| [28] | Detection and classification of transmission line transient faults based on graph convolutional neural network - Tong, H., Qiu, R., Zhang, D., Yang, H., Ding, Q., Shi, X. (2021) |
|
|
|
| [29] | Transmission Line Fault Classification Using Hidden Markov Models - Freire, J., Castro, A., Homci, M., Meiguins, B., Morais, J. (2019) |
|
|
|
| [30] | High Impedance Single-Phase Faults Diagnosis in Transmission Lines via Deep Reinforcement Learning of Transfer Functions - Teimourzadeh, H., Moradzadeh, A., Shoaran, M., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., Razzaghi, R. (2021) |
|
|
|
| [31] | Detection and Evaluation Method of Transmission Line Defects Based on Deep Learning - Liang, H., Zuo, C., Wei, W. (2020) |
|
|
|
| [32] | Detection and classification of internal faults in bipolar HVDC transmission lines based on K-means data description method - Farshad, M. (2019) |
|
|
|
| [33] | Fault Detection and Classification in Power Transmission Lines using Back Propagation Neural Networks - Teja, O., Ramakrishna, M., Bhavana, G., Sireesha, K. (2020) |
|
|
|
| [34] | Component identification and defect detection in transmission lines based on deep learning - Zheng, X., Jia, R., Aisikaer, Gong, L., Zhang, G., Dang, J. (2020) |
|
|
|
3.3. Related Comparative Study and Literature Reviews Summary
-
Advanced Fault Detection, Classification, and Localization in Transmission Lines: A Comparative Study of ANFIS, Neural Networks, and Hybrid Methods by Kanwal, S., Jiriwibhakorn, S. (2024) [35]
- ○
- Summary:
The study used a variety of computational tools to look at fault localization, classification, and detection in power transmission networks. Faults were induced at four sites within the IEEE 9-bus system, resulting in a total of forty distinct fault conditions being examined. ANN, ANFIS, SOM, and a hybrid technique that combines DWT with ANFIS were among the models whose performances were assessed.With an error percentage of 0.008% on average, the ANFIS model showed remarkable defect detection skills. Except for one instance when the error was -0.005%, it correctly categorized all fault kinds. An average percentage inaccuracy of 0.547% was found for fault location. On the other hand, the ANN-based models performed well in fault classification and localization, with average percentage errors of 0.268% and 0.348%, respectively, and reached zero percent error for fault detection.The SOM-based models achieved zero percent error for all faults, demonstrating their superiority in fault identification. However, there were a few minor mistakes in the fault location and categorization, especially for certain fault circumstances. With zero percent error for fault detection and respectable performance for fault classification and localization, the hybrid DWT-ANFIS model produced encouraging results.In comparison to other models, the ANFIS and hybrid techniques performed better overall in defect identification, classification, and location. These results highlight how crucial it is to use cutting-edge computational methods and hybrid approaches to improve the efficiency and dependability of electricity transmission networks. -
Advanced techniques for fault detection and classification in electrical power transmission systems: An overview by Tîrnovan, R. (2019) [36]
- ○
- Summary:
This study provides an extensive overview of power transmission system fault detection and classification techniques. It addresses signal acquisition, highlighting the critical role that feature extraction plays in improving problem detection. It discusses model-based, knowledge-based, and data-driven approaches to fault detection and groups them according to parameters like information amount and quality. The usefulness of several fault detection techniques is demonstrated by the results, which emphasize their importance in guaranteeing the safety and dependability of the electrical grid.The field of fault analysis techniques for power transmission systems has seen a significant upsurge in development in recent years, with an emphasis on AI-based approaches and contemporary techniques. These comprise PMU-based methods for phasor component rapid estimate and fault detection, classification, and direction discrimination. Furthermore, methods for improved defect detection have been used, including multi-information measurements and GSM. Promising outcomes have been observed in AI-based approaches for pattern recognition and ML, including ANNs, DT, BN, k-NN, SVMs, and DL. For example, DTs have been used to identify and classify faults based on phase current data, while ANNs have been used to accurately identify the type of fault in transmission lines. When utilizing wavelet decomposition for fault classification, SVMs have proven to be efficacious, whereas Bayesian networks provide precise fault section estimation in power systems. Moreover, in distance protection schemes, k-NN algorithms have been applied for defect detection and classification. CNNs, one of the DL techniques, have a lot of promise to enhance fault classification performance, particularly when using three-phase current and voltage inputs in multi-channel sequence recognition issues. The aforementioned developments highlight the need of incorporating AI methods into fault identification and classification systems to guarantee the dependability and effectiveness of power transmission networks. -
A Brief Review on Fault Detection, Classification and Location on Transmission Lines Using PMUs by Swain, K., Mandal, S., Mahato, S., Cherukuri, M. (2018) [37]
- ○
- Summary:
Examining fault localization, classification, and detection in power transmission networks using PMUs demonstrates a wide range of approaches and algorithms designed to increase protection systems' dependability and effectiveness. A key method that makes use of the symmetrical characteristics of electrical networks to precisely identify and categorize defects is symmetrical component analysis. For example, a robust fault analysis methodology that leverages PMU data concentrates on the symmetrical components of voltage and current phasors, allowing for rapid fault diagnosis in a relatively short timeframe, often within 2-3 cycles after the incident. In addition to symmetrical component analysis, additional signal processing techniques such as the Stockwell transform have been used to detect and classify faults. This approach effectively detects and classifies faults by examining differential sums and energy computations over half cycles.Algorithms for machine learning have also become effective tools for classifying and detecting faults. Techniques like DTs and SVMs are used because of their capacity to manage intricate data patterns and classification assignments. Additionally, in order to improve problem detection capabilities, the integration of PMU data with other sources—like smart meters—has been investigated. For instance, a technique is put forth to continually monitor transmission line impedance and guarantee data integrity in order to identify potential cyberattacks on PMU data transferred across wide area networks.Large-scale network simulations and small-scale test cases are only two examples of the various simulation studies that are frequently used to validate these approaches. Systems like EMTP/ATP, DigSILENT PowerFactory, and MATLAB offer stable settings for evaluating and verifying suggested algorithms, guaranteeing their effectiveness and dependability in practical uses.The research on fault localization, classification, and detection in PMU-based power transmission systems is a constantly changing and dynamic topic. In order to meet the challenges presented by changing grid dynamics and new threats, researchers work to improve the efficiency, resilience, and dependability of power grid protection systems through creative methods, cutting-edge signal processing techniques, and the integration of machine learning.
3.4. Discussion
Overall Trends and Advancements:
Potential of Emerging Techniques:
Key Challenges and Future Research Directions:
4.. Conclusion
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- S. Bhattacharyya, P. Debnath, A. Deyasi, and N. Dey, Eds., Contemporary Developments in High-Frequency Photonic Devices: in Advances in Computer and Electrical Engineering. IGI Global, 2019. [CrossRef]
- D. Bai, X. Lv, J. Wang, and W. Zheng, “Application of Directional Transmission Data Technology for Transmission Lines,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., vol. 1584, no. 1, p. 012040, Jul. 2020. [CrossRef]
- N. O. Mogaru, “The Basics of Transmission Line Protection,” in 2020 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, Nairobi, Kenya: IEEE, Aug. 2020, pp. 1–5. [CrossRef]
- J. Q. Fahad and R. K. Chillab, “Design aspects of high voltage transmission line,” Bulletin EEI, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 853–861, Jun. 2020. [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, P.K. Kundu, and A. Das, “Transmission Line Faults in Power System and the Different Algorithms for Identification, Classification and Localization: A Brief Review of Methods,” J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. B, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 855–877, Aug. 2021. [CrossRef]
- H. V. Patil, “Three-Phase Fault Analysis on Transmission Line in Matlab Simulink,” IJRASET, vol. 9, no. VI, pp. 5386–5391, Jun. 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. A. Kumar and D. Chandramohan, “Fault test analysis in transmission lines throughout interfering synchrophasor signals,” ICT Express, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 266–270, Dec. 2019. [CrossRef]
- F. M. Gebru, A. O. Salau, S. H. Mohammed, and S. B. Goyal, “Analysis of 3-Phase Symmetrical and Unsymmetrical Fault on Transmission Line using Fortescue Theorem,” WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, vol. 17, pp. 316–323, Oct. 2022. [CrossRef]
- Z. Zhiqiang, C. Fuyong, Z. Han, G. Jieting, J. Peng, and W. Wenzhen, “Modeling and Technology Application for Transmission Line Fault,” in 2018 2nd IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), Beijing, China: IEEE, Oct. 2018, pp. 1–5. [CrossRef]
- A. Reda, I. Al Kurdi, Z. Noun, A. Koubyssi, M. Arnaout, and R. Rammal, “Online Detection of Faults in Transmission Lines,” in 2021 IEEE 3rd International Multidisciplinary Conference on Engineering Technology (IMCET), Beirut, Lebanon: IEEE, Dec. 2021, pp. 37–42. [CrossRef]
- K. Nandhini and C. A. Prajith, “Review on Fault Detection and Classification in Transmission Line using Machine Learning Methods,” in 2023 International Conference on Control, Communication and Computing (ICCC), Thiruvananthapuram, India: IEEE, May 2023, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
- T. S. Kumar et al., “Deep Learning based Fault Detection in Power Transmission Lines,” in 2022 4th International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA), Coimbatore, India: IEEE, Sep. 2022, pp. 861–867. [CrossRef]
- J. Mampilly and S. V. S, “Transmission Lines Fault Detection using Empirical Mode Decomposition in a Grid-Connected Power System,” in 2020 International Conference on Power Electronics and Renewable Energy Applications (PEREA), Kannur, India: IEEE, Nov. 2020, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
- Zhuang, S. Xie, H. Yang, H. Yu, Y. Geng, and R. Zeng, “Flexible Noncontact Approach for Fault Location of Transmission Lines Using Electro-Optic Field Sensors,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2151–2158, Dec. 2021. [CrossRef]
- H. Fasihipour and S. Seyedtabaii, “Fault detection and faulty phase(s) identification in TCSC compensated transmission lines,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1042–1050, Mar. 2020. [CrossRef]
- A. Abu-Siada and S. Mir, “A new on-line technique to identify fault location within long transmission lines,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 105, pp. 52–64, Nov. 2019. [CrossRef]
- B. Abu-Siada and S. Mir, “A new on-line technique to identify fault location within long transmission lines,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 105, pp. 52–64, Nov. 2019. [CrossRef]
- S. K. Mishra and L. N. Tripathy, “A critical fault detection analysis & fault time in a UPFC transmission line,” Prot Control Mod Power Syst, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 3, Dec. 2019. [CrossRef]
- Fault detection through discrete wavelet transform in overhead power transmission lines - Ahmed - 2023 - Energy Science & Engineering - Wiley Online Library. 08 May 1573. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ese3.1573 (accessed on 8 May 2024).
- Othman, V. Veerasamy, I. bin Aris, N. I. A. Wahab, and H. Hizam, “Fault Detection and Classification of Shunt Compensated Transmission Line Using Discrete Wavelet Transform and Naive Bayes Classifier,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2020. [CrossRef]
- V. Ashok, A. Yadav, and A. Y. Abdelaziz, “MODWT-based fault detection and classification scheme for cross-country and evolving faults,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 175, p. 105897, Oct. 2019. [CrossRef]
- U. Saleem, U. Arshad, B. Masood, T. Gul, W. A. Khan, and M. Ellahi, “Faults detection and classification of HVDC transmission lines of using discrete wavelet transform,” in 2018 International Conference on Engineering and Emerging Technologies (ICEET), Lahore, Pakistan: IEEE, Feb. 2018, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
- A. Q. Khan, Q. Ullah, M. Sarwar, S. T. Gul, and N. Iqbal, “Transmission Line Fault Detection and Identification in an Interconnected Power Network using Phasor Measurement Units,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 24, pp. 1356–1363, Jan. 2018. [CrossRef]
- S. Belagoune, N. Bali, A. Bakdi, B. Baadji, and K. Atif, “Deep learning through LSTM classification and regression for transmission line fault detection, diagnosis and location in large-scale multi-machine power systems,” Measurement, vol. 177, p. 109330, Jun. 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. R. Fahim, S. K. Sarker, S. M. Muyeen, S. K. Das, and I. Kamwa, “A deep learning based intelligent approach in detection and classification of transmission line faults,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 133, p. 107102, Dec. 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. R. Fahim, Y. Sarker, S. K. Sarker, Md. R. I. Sheikh, and S. K. Das, “Self attention convolutional neural network with time series imaging based feature extraction for transmission line fault detection and classification,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 187, p. 106437, Oct. 2020. [CrossRef]
- Rafique, F.; Fu, L.; Mai, R. End to end machine learning for fault detection and classification in power transmission lines. Electric Power Systems Research 2021, 199, 107430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- H. Tong, R. C. Qiu, D. Zhang, H. Yang, Q. Ding, and X. Shi, “Detection and classification of transmission line transient faults based on graph convolutional neural network,” CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 456–471, May 2021. [CrossRef]
- Transmission Line Fault Classification Using Hidden Markov Models | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8795474 (accessed on 8 May 2024).
- High Impedance Single-Phase Faults Diagnosis in Transmission Lines via Deep Reinforcement Learning of Transfer Functions | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9328357 (accessed on 8 May 2024).
- Detection and Evaluation Method of Transmission Line Defects Based on Deep Learning | IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9001041 (accessed on 9 May 2024).
- M. Farshad, “Detection and classification of internal faults in bipolar HVDC transmission lines based on K-means data description method,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 104, pp. 615–625, Jan. 2019. [CrossRef]
- O. N. Teja, M. S. Ramakrishna, G. B. Bhavana, and K. Sireesha, “Fault Detection and Classification in Power Transmission Lines using Back Propagation Neural Networks,” in 2020 International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC), Sep. 2020, pp. 1150–1156. [CrossRef]
- X. Zheng, R. Jia, Aisikaer, L. Gong, G. Zhang, and J. Dang, “Component identification and defect detection in transmission lines based on deep learning,” IFS, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 3147–3158, Feb. 2021. [CrossRef]
- S. Kanwal and S. Jiriwibhakorn, “Advanced Fault Detection, Classification, and Localization in Transmission Lines: A Comparative Study of ANFIS, Neural Networks, and Hybrid Methods,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 49017–49033, 2024. [CrossRef]
- R.-A. Tirnovan and M. Cristea, “Advanced techniques for fault detection and classification in electrical power transmission systems: An overview,” in 2019 8th International Conference on Modern Power Systems (MPS), Cluj Napoca, Romania: IEEE, May 2019, pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
- K. Swain, S. Mandal, S. s Mahato, and M. Cherukuri, “A Brief Review on Fault Detection, Classification and Location on Transmission Lines Using PMUs,” vol. 8, pp. 2608–2618, Dec. 2018.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).