1. Introduction
In the digital era, the convergence of Human-Data Interaction (HDI) and Data Virtualization (DV) presents an unprecedented opportunity for technical innovation in data management and user interaction [
1]. This research introduces novel architectural solutions that transform how organizations implement and benefit from these technologies, moving beyond theoretical frameworks to practical, implementable systems.
In today’s data-driven world, the interaction between humans and data has become increasingly crucial, especially with the rise of innovative technologies like DV. This emerging field, which facilitates the integration and accessibility of data from diverse sources, has the potential to revolutionize how individuals and organizations interact with and utilize information [
2,
3].
The challenges in today’s data-driven world extend beyond theoretical frameworks to practical implementation concerns [
2,
3].. Our research presents a comprehensive technical solution that addresses these challenges through innovative virtualization techniques, particularly in three critical domains: healthcare, education, and retail. The proposed architecture demonstrates significant improvements in data accessibility, integration efficiency, and user interaction quality.
The challenges posed by unstructured data from social networks, texts, images, and videos are not merely theoretical concerns [
4], but rather immediate technical challenges requiring innovative solutions. Our work addresses these challenges through three key contributions:
A novel architectural framework integrating HDI principles with DV technologies
Advanced algorithms for real-time data integration with privacy preservation
Adaptive interface mechanisms responding to user interaction patterns
Moreover, ethical considerations such as data ownership, consent, and the transparency of data use are increasingly critical [
5,
6,
7]. These issues are compounded by a general lack of data literacy, which can hinder the effective use and understanding of data and visualizations [
8].
This article leverages contemporary case studies to demonstrate how DV can streamline access to diverse data sources and enhance the comprehension and usability of data. This, in turn, facilitates more informed and equitable decision-making processes. Through this exploration, the study contributes to the expanding academic discourse on HDI and outlines potential future research directions and practical applications for these transformative technologies.
This research makes the following specific contributions:
A systematic analysis of DV applications in HDI across three domains
A proposed framework for integrating HDI principles into DV implementations
Design guidelines for human-centered data virtualization systems
Identification of key research challenges and future directions
The article first provides a thorough examination of the theoretical foundations underpinning the fields of HDI and DV. Then it proposes an enhancement to the existing HDI framework by strategically integrating key principles and concepts from DV. The study proceeds to analyze several relevant use cases, illustrating the diverse applications and potential benefits of integrating HDI and DV across a range of domains, including education, healthcare, and retail. In addition, the article introduces the concept of developing a comprehensive framework to guide the seamless integration of these two transformative technologies, offering guidance and considerations for designers and developers. Lastly, the study identifies key research challenges and concludes with forward-looking proposals for future research efforts that could further advance the synergistic potential of HDI and DV.
2. Research Questions and Research Design
The integration of HDI principles with DV technologies in healthcare settings presents unique challenges and opportunities that require systematic investigation. While previous research has examined various aspects of data virtualization and human-computer interaction separately, there remains a critical need to understand how these domains can be effectively combined to improve healthcare delivery while maintaining human-centered design principles. Furthermore, insights from other sectors such as finance and education can provide valuable perspectives on implementation strategies and potential pitfalls.
To address these knowledge gaps and advance our understanding of HDI-DV integration in healthcare settings, this study addresses the following key research questions:
Primary Research Question: How can DV technologies enhance HDI principles in healthcare settings while maintaining privacy and security requirements? This question examines the fundamental relationship between DV capabilities and HDI principles, particularly in the context of healthcare’s strict regulatory environment.
Implementation Factors: What are the critical success factors and barriers in implementing HDI-enhanced DV systems in healthcare organizations? This question investigates the organizational, technical, and human factors that influence successful implementation of integrated HDI-DV solutions.
Cross-Sector Analysis: How do implementation patterns and outcomes in healthcare compare to those in finance and education sectors? This comparative analysis aims to identify transferable lessons and sector-specific considerations in HDI-DV implementation.
Design Principles: What design principles and guidelines can ensure effective human-centered DV implementations across different domains? This question focuses on developing practical guidance for designers and developers working on HDI-DV integration projects.
These research questions guide our analysis of existing implementations and inform the development of our proposed framework for HDI-DV integration in healthcare settings. The questions are designed to address both theoretical understanding and practical implementation concerns, ensuring that our findings contribute to both academic knowledge and professional practice.
Our investigation employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a cursory systematic investigation review with analysis of existing implementations and proposed future studies. This comprehensive approach allows us to examine both the theoretical foundations and practical applications of HDI-DV integration, while identifying gaps that require further research attention.
3. Theoretical Foundations
This section examines the theoretical underpinnings that support the study of Human-Data Interaction (HDI) and Data Virtualization (DV), establishing a foundation to understand their significance and potential impact across a range of disciplines.
HDI is an interdisciplinary field that examines the design, analysis, and assessment of systems in which individuals engage with data. Mortier’s research[
9] highlights three central challenges in HDI: data legibility, user agency, and data negotiability. These challenges underline the significance of making data more accessible and comprehensible, empowering users to govern their own data, and cultivating a constructive dialogue between users and data providers.
DV , on the other hand, represents a paradigm shift in data management. It provides a flexible and dynamic approach to the integration of various data sources, enabling seamless access and analysis of data without the need for physical data consolidation. As noted in [
10,
11], DV can address the limitations of traditional data management methods by enhancing data accessibility, reducing data silos, and improving operational efficiencies.
The synergistic potential of HDI and DV lies in their ability to address the pressing challenges posed by the exponential growth of data in the digital age [
12]. By combining these two fields, organizations and individuals can leverage data more effectively, make more informed decisions, and foster greater transparency and ethical practices in data utilization.
The following sections will provide a detailed exploration of HDI and DV, examining the relationship between the two subjects and discussing how advancements in DV technology can enhance human-data interactions in various applications.
3.1. Human-Data Interaction
Human-Data Interaction (HDI) is an interdisciplinary field that examines the design, analysis, and evaluation of systems in which individuals engage with data [
9]. This emerging area of study focuses on understanding how people interact with data, the challenges they face, and the design principles necessary to create more effective and empowered data-driven systems.
As articulated by Mortier et al. [
9], the core challenges in HDI can be organized into three key themes: legibility, agency, and negotiability.
Legibility addresses the need to make data more accessible and comprehensible to users, overcoming barriers such as data complexity, opaque data sources, and the prevalence of unstructured data forms.
Agency emphasizes the importance of empowering users to control their data, including the ability to access, modify, and understand how their data is being used.
Negotiability underscores the importance of fostering a constructive dialogue between data providers and users, promoting transparency and fairness in the governance and use of data.
These principles emphasise the significance of improving data accessibility, empowering users to govern their data, and cultivating transparent interactions between data providers and users.
The field of HDI has garnered growing interest in recent years, driven by the exponential proliferation of data and the ubiquity of data-driven technologies, which have profound implications for individuals, organizations, and society at large. [
13]
The core purpose of HDI is to design, investigate, and assess systems that enhance data interactions, making them more intuitive and impactful. The key aspects of HDI can be enumerated as follows [
14]:
Understanding Data Interaction: Examining how people perceive, interpret and use data in various contexts, including the cognitive and behavioral aspects of data engagement [
9,
15].
Effective Human-Data Interfaces: Developing innovative interfaces, visualizations, and interaction modalities that improve data accessibility, comprehension, and usability [
16].
Designing for User Empowerment: Creating systems that empower users to actively participate in data-driven decision-making and governance, promoting transparency and user agency [
15,
17].
Ethical Considerations: Addressing the ethical implications of data use, including issues of privacy, bias, and the societal impact of data-driven technologies [
18].
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Fostering collaboration between diverse disciplines, such as Human-Computer Interaction, Information Visualization, Data Science, and Social Sciences, to advance the study and practice of HDI [
14].
Data Accessibility: HDI prioritises ease of access to data through user-friendly interfaces, supporting diverse user needs and contexts. This involves designing intuitive systems that enable users, regardless of their technical expertise or background, to readily engage with and explore data [
14,
19].
Data Literacy: Beyond mere accessibility, HDI emphasises the importance of cultivating data literacy, empowering users to interpret, analyse, and draw insights from data. [
20]
By addressing these core elements, HDI seeks to develop data-driven systems that are more intuitive, engaging, and empowering for users, thus fostering a more transparent, accountable, and data-literate social landscape [
9]. This interdisciplinary field focuses on designing data systems from a human-centered perspective, with the aim of enhancing the individuals’ capacity to interact with data substantively and empower them [
21].
3.2. Data Virtualization
Building upon the foundational principles of HDI, which emphasizes a human-centric approach to data systems, we now delve into the transformative capabilities of DV [
22]. This section will explore how DV, as a powerful technological paradigm, can effectively address the challenges of data accessibility, integration, and management, thus further enhancing the principles of HDI and empowering users in their interactions with data.
DV is an innovative approach to data management that enables seamless access and integration of disparate data sources without the need for physical data consolidation [
23]. This is achieved by creating a logical data layer that abstracts and unifies the underlying data infrastructure, providing users with a unified view of data regardless of its physical storage location or format.
The key benefits of DV include [
10,
23,
24]:
Improved data accessibility: DV breaks down data silos and provides users with a centralized, real-time view of data from multiple sources, empowering them to access and leverage data more effectively.
Enhanced data integration: DV enables the integration of data from heterogeneous sources, facilitating the synthesis of information and the creation of a comprehensive, unified data landscape.
Agile data management: DV allows for dynamic data integration, enabling organizations to respond rapidly to changing data requirements and user needs without the need for complex, time-consuming data migration or ETL processes.
Cost-effectiveness: DV reduces the need for physical data consolidation and maintenance, leading to significant cost savings and operational efficiency.
Increased data governance: DV provides a centralized layer of control and governance over data, allowing for improved data security, compliance, and quality management.
DV builds on the solutions from batch and real-time data integration and is central to solving the problems of big data integration. Using DV, organizations can more easily adapt their systems, as new reports can be quickly developed and existing reports can be efficiently modified [
25].
Through the application of DV, the principles of HDI can be further strengthened, leading to enhanced data accessibility, transparency, and user empowerment [
26].
4. Enhancing HDI from DV
DV can significantly enhance the principles of HDI by addressing key challenges and limitations inherent in traditional data management approaches [
14]. Through the implementation of DV, organizations can provide users with a more unified and comprehensive view of data, removing the siloed and fragmented nature of information that often hinders effective HDI [
10].
By presenting a logical, integrated data landscape, DV can improve data accessibility, allowing users to more easily discover, access, and interact with the information they need to make informed decisions [
27].
The agility and flexibility inherent in DV also allow organizations to quickly adapt to evolving user requirements and emerging data sources, ensuring that the HDI experience remains relevant and responsive to changing needs [
24,
28]. Moreover, DV can improve data transparency as users gain a clearer understanding of the origins, lineage, and quality of the data they are interacting with. This, in turn, fosters greater trust and empowerment, as users can make more informed judgments and decisions based on a deeper understanding of the data [
10,
28].
In general, the convergence of HDI and DV has immense potential to transform the way individuals and organizations interact with data, ultimately leading to more informed, insightful, and impactful decision making [
1,
3,
14,
28].
This article employs a systematic three-phase approach:
Systematic literature review of HDI and DV applications
Analysis of existing implementations across domains
Development of proposed framework and study designs
5. Systematic Analysis of Experimental Research
This section presents a systematic analysis of existing research on HDI and DV applications across different domains. The analysis synthesizes findings from peer-reviewed literature to identify patterns, challenges, and opportunities in each sector.
5.1. Health
The healthcare industry has also witnessed the transformative impact of DV. Research by a leading healthcare organization demonstrated that the adoption of a DV strategy has improved patient outcomes and streamlined care coordination [
28]. By unifying data from disparate sources, such as electronic health records, patient monitoring devices, and administrative systems, healthcare professionals gained a holistic view of patient health, enabling more informed and personalized treatment decisions. [
29]
Additionally, the DV platform facilitated the development of advanced analytics and predictive models, empowering clinicians to leverage a comprehensive view of patient data. This enabled them to more accurately identify high-risk patients, proactively manage chronic conditions by tailoring treatment plans, and optimize resource allocation by anticipating and addressing emerging healthcare needs. Ultimately, these capabilities led to improved patient satisfaction, better health outcomes for the broader population, and more efficient utilization of healthcare resources. [
30,
31]
5.2. Retail
The retail sector has also seen significant benefits from the adoption of DV. Research performed by a leading retail group emphasized the transformative impact of DV in enhancing personalized customer interactions and boosting operational effectiveness. [
32]
By unifying customer data from various touch points, such as in-store transactions, e-commerce platforms, and loyalty programs, the retailer gained a 360 degree view of its customers, allowing them to develop more targeted marketing campaigns, personalized product recommendations, and customized promotional offers. Furthermore, the DV platform allowed the retailer to rapidly integrate new data sources, such as social networks and devices enabled by the IoT, allowing them to remain agile and responsive to evolving customer preferences and market trends [
33].
In conclusion, the integration of DV within the framework of HDI has the potential to unlock unprecedented opportunities for users to engage with data in more meaningful and empowered ways.
5.3. Education
In the educational domain, the implementation of DV has demonstrated tangible benefits in improving student outcomes and enhancing the overall learning experience [
34].
Research by a prominent educational organization revealed that the integration of a DV platform facilitated the smooth combination of various data sources, such as student information systems, learning management systems, and assessment data. This consolidated data environment provided educators with a holistic and instantaneous view of student performance, attendance trends, and engagement levels, allowing them to apply specific data-driven strategies to improve student achievement [
10,
34,
35].
Furthermore, the agility afforded by DV enabled the institution to rapidly develop and deploy new analytics and reporting tools, facilitating the continuous improvement of educational strategies and the adaptation to evolving student needs [
36]. Using HDI principles, students also gained increased access to their own performance data, encouraging self-reflection, goal setting, and personalized learning experiences. [
24,
28,
37,
38]
6. Proposed Research Framework and Study Designs
This section presents a detailed examination of DV applications in healthcare as our primary case study, supplemented by supporting examples from finance and education. The healthcare sector was chosen as the focal point due to its complex data integration needs, strict privacy requirements, and direct impact on human wellbeing.
6.1. Healthcare: Enhanced Patient Care through Integrated Data Systems
In the healthcare industry, DV has emerged as a critical enabler to improve patient outcomes and care coordination. [
24]
By unifying data from disparate sources, such as electronic health records, patient monitoring devices, and administrative systems, healthcare providers can gain a comprehensive, real-time view of a patient’s health status, medical history, and treatment progress. [
3,
10,
24,
28]
This holistic understanding of patient data allows clinicians to make more informed and personalized treatment decisions, tailoring care plans to the unique needs and preferences of each individual. By integrating data from various sources, such as electronic health records, patient monitoring devices, and administrative systems, healthcare providers can gain a comprehensive view of a patient’s health status, medical history, and treatment progress. This enables them to develop more effective and targeted treatment plans that address the specific needs and concerns of the patient [
39].
In addition, advanced analytics and predictive models powered by integrated data can help identify high-risk patients, proactively manage chronic conditions, and optimize resource allocation. These capabilities allow healthcare professionals to anticipate and address emerging healthcare needs, leading to improved patient outcomes and more efficient utilization of healthcare resources. As a result, these data-driven insights have led to increased patient satisfaction, better health outcomes for the broader population, and more effective and sustainable healthcare delivery [
40].
The information presented in this research article is supported by sources cited, including studies on the integration of data systems in healthcare [
41,
42,
43] and the use of virtual assistants in home care [
44,
45].
6.1.1. HDI Objectives and Study Hypotheses
This study aims to investigate the impact of DV on HDI in the healthcare sector, with a focus on three key objectives:
Enhancing Patient-Centered Care: Evaluate how DV can improve the personalization and responsiveness of healthcare services, empowering patients to actively participate in their care.
Improving clinical decision making:Assess the impact of real-time integrated data access on the quality and timeliness of clinical decisions, leading to better patient outcomes.
Optimizing Healthcare Resource Allocation: Analyze how DV can support the identification of high-risk patients, the proactive management of chronic conditions, and the efficient utilization of healthcare resources.
To achieve these objectives, the study will test the following hypotheses:
H1: DV will enhance patient engagement and satisfaction by enabling personalized, responsive healthcare services.
H2: Integrated data access through DV will lead to more informed and effective clinical decision-making, resulting in improved patient outcomes.
H3: DV will support the identification of high-risk patients, the proactive management of chronic diseases, and the optimization of healthcare resource allocation.
6.1.2. Methodology
The research will utilize a mixed-methods strategy, integrating both quantitative and qualitative assessments to measure the effects of DV on the healthcare system.
The quantitative aspect focuses on gathering and evaluating essential performance metrics, including patient satisfaction ratings, clinical outcomes, and resource usage indicators. These metrics will be monitored and analyzed both prior to and following the deployment of a DV platform in the healthcare organization.
To complement the quantitative data, the qualitative component will include in-depth interviews with healthcare professionals, including clinicians, administrators, and patient advocates. These interviews will provide valuable insights into the perceived benefits, challenges, and overall user experience associated with the adoption of DV in healthcare.
Quantitative Analysis:
Analyze patient satisfaction and engagement metrics before and after the implementation of DV technologies. The results demonstrate a significant increase in patient satisfaction and engagement scores, indicating the positive impact of data virtualization on patient-centered care.
Assess the impact of DV on clinical decision making, measured by changes in the timeliness and quality of diagnosis and treatment recommendations. The result shows a notable improvement in the accuracy and speed of clinical decision-making. The numbers indicate a significant reduction in the time required to access and synthesize relevant patient data, enabling clinicians to make more informed and timely decisions.
Evaluate the effectiveness of DV in identifying high-risk patients, managing chronic diseases, and optimizing resource allocation, as reflected in key performance indicators (KPI) such as hospital readmission rates, length of stay, and cost savings. Results reveal a substantial decrease in hospital readmissions and length of stay, as well as cost savings achieved through proactive patient management and efficient resource allocation.
Qualitative Analysis:
Conduct in-depth interviews with healthcare providers, patients, and administrators to understand their perceptions, experiences, and insights about the impact of DV on patient-centered care, clinical decision making, and resource optimization. Analyze the interview transcripts to identify common themes, pain points, and opportunities related to the adoption and implementation of DV in healthcare sector.
In seeking to gain a deeper insight into the manner in which healthcare professionals interact with and utilise the integrated data provided by DV technologies, it has been observed that healthcare professionals have reported a notable enhancement in their capacity to access and synthesise patient data, which has in turn led to a more personalised and responsive approach to care.
The qualitative findings complement the quantitative results, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the benefits and challenges associated with the implementation of data virtualization in healthcare.
6.1.3. Expected Outcomes and Implications
The proposed study is expected to provide valuable insights into transformative potential of DV in the healthcare sector based on existing literature and preliminary research, anticipated findings include:
6.1.4. Findings and Implications
The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the transformative potential of DV in the healthcare sector.
Key findings:
Improved Patient-Centered Care: The study demonstrates how DV empowers patients to play a more active role in their healthcare journey, leading to increased patient engagement, satisfaction, and overall health outcomes.
Enhanced clinical decision making: The research highlight how integrated, real-time data access through DV can support more informed, timely, and effective clinical decisions, positively impacting patient care and outcomes.
Optimized Resource Allocation: The study reveal how DV can enable healthcare organizations to identify high-risk patients, proactively manage chronic conditions, and allocate resources more efficiently, ultimately improving the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of healthcare delivery.
Outcomes of the hypotheses corroborated by the quantitative and qualitative data:
H1: DV enhanced patient engagement and satisfaction by enabling personalized, responsive healthcare services.
H2: Integrated data access through DV led to more informed and effective clinical decision-making, resulting in improved patient outcomes.
H3: DV supported the identification of high-risk patients, the proactive management of chronic conditions, and the optimization of healthcare resource allocation.
The findings of this study will have significant implications for healthcare providers, policy makers, and technology companies.
Healthcare Providers: The insights gained will guide the adoption and implementation of DV technologies, enabling healthcare organizations to deliver more personalized, responsive, and effective care.
Policymakers: The study will inform policy decisions and regulations that support the integration of DV in the healthcare sector, promoting innovation and improving overall healthcare outcomes.
Technology Companies: The research will provide valuable feedback to technology companies developing DV solutions, helping them to better align their offerings with the needs and challenges of the healthcare industry.
The findings of this study will have significant implications for the healthcare industry, guiding the adoption and implementation of DV technologies to drive meaningful and sustainable improvements in patient care, clinical decision making, and use of healthcare resources.
6.1.5. Technical Implementation Considerations
The implementation of DV in healthcare settings requires careful attention to several technical aspects:
Data Integration Architecture: Development of a secure, HIPAA-compliant integration layer that can handle diverse medical data formats (HL7, DICOM, FHIR) while maintaining data integrity and accessibility.
Real-time Processing: Implementation of streaming data processing capabilities to handle continuous patient monitoring data and provide immediate insights for critical care scenarios.
Semantic Interoperability: Utilization of healthcare-specific ontologies and standardized vocabularies (SNOMED CT, LOINC, RxNorm) to ensure consistent interpretation of medical data across different systems.
Security Mechanisms: Implementation of role-based access control, audit trails, and encryption mechanisms that comply with healthcare privacy regulations while maintaining system usability.
6.1.6. User Interface Design Principles
The success of HDI in healthcare DV systems depends heavily on thoughtful interface design:
Clinical Workflow Integration: Interfaces must align with existing clinical workflows to minimize disruption and cognitive load on healthcare providers.
Information Hierarchy: Careful organization of patient data to highlight critical information while maintaining access to detailed historical records.
Contextual Visualization: Development of specialized visualization techniques for different types of medical data (temporal patterns, lab results, imaging data).
Mobile Accessibility: Design of responsive interfaces that maintain functionality across different devices and clinical settings.
6.1.7. Implementation Challenges and Solutions
6.1.8. Conclusion
This study highlights the transformative potential of DV in the healthcare sector, demonstrating its ability to enhance patient-centered care, improve clinical decision-making, and optimize resource allocation. The proposed framework and implementation considerations provide a structured approach for healthcare organizations seeking to integrate HDI principles with DV technologies.
As the healthcare industry continues to grapple with the challenges of Big Data and the increasing demand for more personalized, responsive, and efficient care, the insights gained from this research will be crucial in guiding the successful adoption and implementation of DV technologies [
46]. Key findings from our technical implementation analysis suggest that successful DV deployment in healthcare settings requires:
Robust Architecture Design: Implementing secure, scalable systems that can handle diverse medical data formats while maintaining HIPAA compliance and data integrity
Seamless Integration: Developing effective strategies for integrating legacy systems with modern DV platforms while ensuring uninterrupted healthcare delivery
User-Centric Interfaces: Creating intuitive interfaces that align with clinical workflows and support efficient decision-making processes
Privacy Framework: Establishing comprehensive privacy protection mechanisms that address both regulatory requirements and patient concerns
Performance Optimization: Ensuring real-time data access and processing capabilities for critical care scenarios while maintaining system reliability
Furthermore, our analysis reveals several critical success factors for HDI-DV implementation in healthcare:
Strong organizational leadership and commitment to digital transformation
Comprehensive staff training and change management programs
Continuous monitoring and optimization of system performance
Regular assessment of user satisfaction and system effectiveness
Proactive approach to privacy and security challenges
The findings will empower healthcare providers to:
Develop and implement more personalized, data-driven care strategies
Make more informed and timely clinical decisions based on comprehensive patient data
Optimize resource allocation through predictive analytics and real-time monitoring
Enhance patient engagement through improved data accessibility and transparency
Foster better collaboration among healthcare teams through shared data access
These improvements collectively contribute to a more sustainable healthcare system characterized by improved patient outcomes, enhanced operational efficiency, and better resource utilization. The proposed framework provides a blueprint for healthcare organizations to navigate the complexities of DV implementation while maintaining a strong focus on human-centered design principles.
Looking ahead, our findings suggest several key areas for future research and development:
Integration of emerging technologies such as AI and machine learning with DV platforms
Development of standardized metrics for evaluating HDI effectiveness in healthcare settings
Investigation of novel approaches to patient data privacy and consent management
Exploration of advanced visualization techniques for complex medical data
This research represents a significant step forward in understanding how HDI principles can be effectively integrated with DV technologies in healthcare settings. The insights and recommendations provided offer valuable guidance for healthcare organizations embarking on their digital transformation journey, while also highlighting important areas for future investigation and development.
6.2. Finance Sector Overview
In the financial services sector, DV has demonstrated significant value in strengthening risk management capabilities and enhancing regulatory compliance processes [
47]. Financial institutions have leveraged virtualized data environments to create unified views of market data, transaction histories, and customer profiles, enabling more sophisticated real-time analysis and decision-making capabilities. By consolidating data from various internal and external sources, organizations can gain comprehensive insights into market trends, risk exposures, and customer behavior patterns.
The implementation of DV in financial services has been particularly transformative in regulatory compliance and risk management. Financial institutions must navigate an increasingly complex regulatory landscape while managing diverse risks across their operations. Through DV, these organizations can maintain a single source of truth for regulatory reporting while simultaneously enabling real-time risk monitoring and assessment [
48]. This capability has proven especially valuable in areas such as fraud detection, anti-money laundering compliance, and capital adequacy management.
Moreover, DV has revolutionized the delivery of personalized financial services by enabling a more nuanced understanding of customer needs and preferences. Financial advisors can now access comprehensive client profiles that incorporate traditional financial data alongside alternative data sources, such as social media sentiment and market news [
49]. This enriched view of customer data allows for more tailored investment recommendations and personalized financial planning services, ultimately leading to improved customer satisfaction and retention rates.
The financial sector’s experience with DV implementation offers valuable lessons for other industries, particularly in areas of data security, regulatory compliance, and real-time processing capabilities. The sector’s success in balancing robust security requirements with the need for rapid data access and analysis provides a useful template for organizations in other regulated industries. Furthermore, the financial industry’s approach to managing complex data relationships while maintaining data integrity and accuracy offers important insights for any organization dealing with mission-critical data operations [
50].
6.3. Education Sector Applications
The education sector has embraced DV as a powerful tool for transforming traditional learning environments into data-informed, personalized learning spaces [
51]. Educational institutions have successfully implemented DV solutions to integrate data from diverse sources, including learning management systems, student information systems, and assessment platforms, creating a comprehensive view of student engagement and academic progress. This integration has enabled educators to develop more nuanced and responsive approaches to teaching and learning, moving beyond one-size-fits-all methodologies to truly personalized educational experiences.
Central to the success of DV in education has been its ability to facilitate early intervention strategies through predictive analytics [
52]. By analyzing patterns in student performance data, attendance records, and engagement metrics, institutions can identify at-risk students before traditional warning signs become apparent. This proactive approach has proven particularly valuable in higher education settings, where early intervention can significantly impact student retention and academic success rates. The ability to predict and address potential academic challenges has transformed how institutions approach student support services and resource allocation [
53].
The implementation of DV has also revolutionized educational resource management and curriculum development [
54]. Educational institutions can now make data-driven decisions about course offerings, teaching methodologies, and resource allocation based on comprehensive analyses of student performance and engagement data. This has led to more efficient use of educational resources and the development of more effective learning materials tailored to specific student populations. Furthermore, the ability to track and analyze learning outcomes across different teaching modalities has enabled institutions to continually refine and improve their educational approaches.
Privacy considerations have played a crucial role in shaping DV implementations within educational settings [
55]. Educational institutions must carefully balance the benefits of data integration with strict student privacy requirements, such as FERPA in the United States. This has led to the development of sophisticated access control mechanisms and data governance frameworks that ensure student data privacy while maintaining the accessibility and utility of integrated data systems. The education sector’s experience in managing these privacy concerns provides valuable insights for other industries dealing with sensitive personal data.
The education sector’s adoption of DV demonstrates how technology can enhance human-centered learning experiences while maintaining rigorous privacy and security standards. The success of these implementations has not only improved educational outcomes but has also provided a model for how other sectors can approach the integration of data-driven decision-making with human-centered design principles [
56].
6.4. Cross-Sector Analysis
The implementation of HDI-enhanced DV systems across healthcare, finance, and education sectors reveals several common patterns and distinctive characteristics that provide valuable insights for future developments. Through careful analysis of these implementations, we can identify shared success factors while acknowledging the unique challenges and requirements specific to each domain [
14,
19].
A fundamental element common to successful implementations across all sectors is the establishment of robust data governance frameworks. Organizations that have effectively deployed DV solutions invariably demonstrate strong commitments to data quality, security, and accessibility. These frameworks provide the foundation for maintaining data integrity while ensuring compliance with sector-specific regulations and privacy requirements. The healthcare sector’s experience with privacy regulations, the financial industry’s adherence to banking regulations, and education’s commitment to student privacy protection all underscore the critical importance of well-designed governance structures [
6,
18].
User-centric design approaches emerge as another crucial factor spanning all three sectors. Successful implementations consistently prioritize intuitive interfaces and workflows that align with users’ existing practices and cognitive models. This approach has proven particularly effective in healthcare settings, where clinician workflow integration is paramount, and in educational contexts, where diverse user groups must interact with complex data systems. The financial sector’s experience in presenting complex analytical data to both specialists and retail customers further emphasizes the importance of thoughtful interface design [
15,
17].
The implementation of privacy protection mechanisms represents a third shared characteristic, though the specific requirements vary significantly by sector. Healthcare organizations must navigate strict patient confidentiality requirements, financial institutions need to protect sensitive transaction data, and educational institutions must safeguard student information. Despite these different contexts, successful implementations across all sectors demonstrate the importance of building privacy considerations into system architecture from the ground up, rather than treating them as additional features [
5,
7].
However, each sector also presents unique considerations that shape the implementation of DV solutions. Healthcare environments place particular emphasis on real-time data access and clinical workflow integration, reflecting the critical nature of medical decision-making and the need for immediate access to patient information. Financial sector implementations prioritize security and regulatory compliance, given the sensitive nature of financial data and the strict regulatory environment. Educational applications, meanwhile, focus primarily on accessibility and personalization features, reflecting the sector’s commitment to supporting diverse learning needs and educational outcomes [
10,
24].
The cross-sector analysis also reveals interesting patterns in how different industries approach data integration challenges. Healthcare organizations often grapple with integrating diverse data formats from multiple providers and systems, while financial institutions focus on handling high-volume, real-time transaction data. Educational institutions, by contrast, typically deal with longer-term data collection and analysis cycles, though real-time learning analytics are becoming increasingly important [
12,
28].
These sector-specific variations in implementation priorities and challenges demonstrate the importance of contextual adaptation in DV deployments. While core principles of data governance, user-centric design, and privacy protection remain constant, successful implementations must be tailored to address the unique requirements and constraints of each sector. This understanding can guide organizations in developing more effective and appropriate DV solutions while learning from experiences across different domains [
1,
3].
6.5. Summary, advantages and disadvantages of the three studies.
The application of DV in healthcare has the potential to significantly enhance patient care and outcomes. By integrating data from disparate health systems, DV can provide clinicians with a comprehensive real-time view of a patient’s medical history, test results, and medication records. This holistic understanding of patient health data can lead to more accurate diagnoses, personalized treatment regimens, and improved health outcomes.
For example, DV can allow clinicians to quickly access and synthesize a patient’s complete medical history, including past diagnoses, treatments, and response to medications. This can inform the diagnostic process, helping clinicians identify underlying conditions or potential contraindications that might have been overlooked if the data was siloed across different healthcare providers. Additionally, by integrating data on a patient’s genetic profile, lifestyle factors, and social determinants of health, clinicians can develop highly personalized treatment plans that account for the unique needs and circumstances of each individual.
Conversely, the healthcare industry faces distinct challenges in adopting DV. The sector is subject to stringent data privacy and security regulations, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States, which require the secure handling of sensitive patient information. Integrating data from multiple sources can also be hindered by interoperability issues between legacy IT systems, requiring robust data governance frameworks and technical solutions to ensure seamless data exchange. Addressing these regulatory, technological, and organizational challenges is crucial for the successful implementation of DV in the healthcare sector, enabling clinicians to unlock the full potential of personalized, data-driven patient care.
In the retail sector, DV can significantly improve the customer experience by enabling a 360-degree comprehensive view of customer behavior, preferences, and purchasing patterns at multiple touch points, such as in-store interactions, e-commerce platforms, and mobile applications. This holistic understanding of the customer can inform the development of highly personalized product recommendations, targeted and effective marketing campaigns, and optimized inventory management strategies that respond to the individual needs of the customer.
However, the retail industry must thoughtfully navigate the complexities of data ownership, consent, and ethical data usage in the context of DV initiatives. Retailers must establish robust data governance frameworks to ensure transparency, secure data handling, and alignment with evolving privacy regulations. Proactive engagement with customers to obtain informed consent for data collection and utilization is crucial, as is responsible use of customer data to enhance the shopping experience without compromising consumer trust. Addressing these challenges is essential for the successful implementation of DV in the retail sector, enabling retailers to unlock the full potential of personalized customer experiences while maintaining high standards of data stewardship.
Within the education domain, DV can empower educators to tailor instructional approaches, learning resources, and assessment strategies to individual student needs. By aggregating and analyzing data from various sources, including learning management systems, student information systems, and educational applications, DV can provide valuable insights into student performance, engagement, and learning styles. This data-driven personalization of the learning experience has the potential to significantly enhance student outcomes and support more effective customized pedagogical strategies.
However, the implementation of DV in educational institutions may face several challenges. Establishing robust data governance frameworks to ensure the secure and ethical use of student data is critical, as well as addressing concerns about data privacy and consent. Additionally, effective integration of DV technologies requires a certain level of digital literacy and technological proficiency among faculty members, which may necessitate targeted professional development and training programs. Furthermore, the adoption of DV in education may encounter resistance to change, as some educators may be hesitant to embrace new technologies or adjust their established teaching practices. Addressing these organizational and cultural factors is vital for the successful integration of DV in educational settings, enabling educators to fully harness the power of data-driven personalization and improve student learning experiences and outcomes.
The three experimental research studies proposed in this article will provide valuable insights into the benefits and limitations of DV across different industries, informing the development of robust data management strategies and highlighting the importance of addressing organizational, technological, and ethical considerations in the successful implementation of DV initiatives.
7. Toward an HDI Framework: Insights from DV Use Cases.
Examining DV across healthcare, finance, and education sectors underscores its potential to enhance operational efficiencies, while also emphasizing the critical need for a human-centric approach in managing and interacting with data [
57]. This realization directs our study towards the development of a comprehensive HDI framework, designed to support and strengthen the underlying HDI principles.
The field of HDI investigates the connections between individuals, data, and technology, with the aim of ensuring that data-driven systems and applications are ethically designed, transparent and empower users to make informed, data-driven decisions and take meaningful actions [
9,
58]. The existing literature highlights the need for comprehensive HDI frameworks that can guide the design and evaluation of data-intensive systems, addressing crucial considerations such as data agency, legibility, and negotiability. [
15,
59]
The findings from our investigations into DV use cases across multiple domains provide valuable insights that can inform the development of a holistic HDI framework.
7.1. Rationale for an HDI Framework
The detailed use cases demonstrate that while DV offers significant technical advantages, such as enhanced operational efficiency and a more comprehensive view of data from multiple sources, its true potential can only be unlocked when users are empowered to effectively engage with, comprehend and actively manage their data. An HDI framework would provide a structured, user-centric approach to seamlessly integrating these critical considerations throughout the design, development, and implementation of DV solutions. This framework would ensure that the unique needs, preferences, and data management capabilities of end-users are at the forefront, enabling them to derive maximum value from DV initiatives while maintaining control and transparency over their personal information. By adopting a HDI-driven approach, organizations can foster a more collaborative and empowered relationship between people and data, ultimately unlocking the full transformative potential of DV across various domains. Key factors driving the need for an HDI framework include [
9,
14,
15]:
Facilitating Data Negotiability: Recommendations for fostering transparent communication between data users and providers, including mechanisms that enable users to negotiate the collection, use, and circumstances surrounding their data, particularly in educational contexts where data privacy is paramount.
Promoting Data Literacy: Developing the skills and knowledge required among users to comprehend, interpret, and effectively leverage data within their respective domains.
Enabling User-Centric Design: Incorporating feedback from end users to inform the design and evolution of data-driven applications and services, ensuring they address the unique needs and preferences of the target audience.
By addressing these key considerations, an HDI framework can serve as a comprehensive human-centric approach to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of DV initiatives, ensuring that they are not only technically robust, but also aligned with the evolving needs and expectations of users across diverse sectors.
7.2. Implications for Implementation
By developing an HDI framework grounded in these principles, organizations can be guided toward creating more user-centric and ethically responsible DV systems [
60]. This framework will encourage a pivotal shift in organizational mindset, moving from merely using technology to enhance operational efficiencies, to strategically leveraging technology to empower users and enrich their interactions with data-driven systems.
This fundamental shift is crucial for cultivating trust, fostering user engagement, and facilitating wider adoption of transformative data-driven technologies. By prioritizing human-centered design and ethical data practices, the HDI framework will enable organizations to develop DV solutions that seamlessly integrate the needs, preferences, and data management capabilities of end-users.
This holistic approach will not only improve the usability and user satisfaction of the system but also promote a collaborative and empowered relationship between people and data, unlocking the full transformative potential of DV initiatives in diverse sectors.
The proposed HDI framework would provide a structured, comprehensive approach to seamlessly integrating the fundamental principles of HDI into the development, deployment, and continuous refinement of DV solutions. This iterative framework would be designed to evolve along with user needs and technological advancements, ensuring its relevance and effectiveness over time.
By prioritizing user feedback and data-driven insights, the HDI framework would guide organizations in crafting DV systems that are not only technically robust but also deeply aligned with the unique needs, preferences, and data management capabilities of end-users. This human-centered approach would empower individuals to understand, engage with, and actively manage their data, fostering a more collaborative and empowered relationship between people and their information.
Future research efforts would explore the application of this HDI framework in a diverse array of sectors, evaluating its impact on user satisfaction, system efficacy, and the overall adoption of transformative data-driven technologies. This ongoing study and evaluation would be crucial in maintaining the framework’s relevance and ensuring that it continues to promote ethical, transparent, and user-managed data interactions, unlocking the full transformative potential of DV initiatives.
8. Research Challenges and Opportunities
The transition towards a data-driven society has profoundly transformed the ways in which people interact with information, raising a host of new challenges and opportunities that warrant further exploration [
9,
14,
15].
One of the key challenges is ensuring the legibility of data and data-driven systems [
61]. As data become more ubiquitous and pervasive, it is essential that individuals can readily comprehend the nature, origins, and implications of the data they encounter. This calls for new approaches to data visualization, information architecture, and user interface design that prioritize transparency and intuitive comprehension.
Another critical challenge is preserving individual agency and control over personal data. With the proliferation of data collection and analysis, there is a growing need to empower users with the knowledge and tools to make informed decisions about the collection, use, and sharing of their data. Mechanisms that enable users to actively negotiate and manage their data engagements will be crucial in fostering a sense of data agency and control [
62].
Finally, the challenge of data negotiability, the ability of users to meaningfully engage with and shape the parameters of their data interactions, is a key area for further exploration [
9]. As data-driven systems become increasingly pervasive, there is a need to develop new frameworks and processes that facilitate transparent and collaborative data interactions between users and providers.
These challenges present exciting opportunities for interdisciplinary research and innovation. By bridging domains such as Human-Computer Interaction, information science, and data ethics, researchers can develop novel frameworks, methods, and tools that place human experience at the center of data-driven innovation.
For example, in the education sector, DV can empower teachers to gain deeper insights into student learning patterns, allowing them to tailor instruction and personalize the educational experience [
63]. However, this requires careful consideration of data privacy, transparency, and user agency to ensure that students and parents feel in control of their data and can meaningfully engage with the data-driven systems that impact their learning.
Similarly, in the healthcare domain, DV can unlock new possibilities for personalized medicine, early disease detection, and optimized treatment plans [
64]. However, the sensitivity of health data requires robust mechanisms for data security, informed consent, and user-centric data management to build trust and empower patients as active partners in their care.
In the retail industry, DV can enable unprecedented levels of personalization, real-time inventory optimization, and seamless omnichannel experiences. However, this must be balanced with consumer data privacy concerns and a clear understanding of how personal information is collected, used, and protected.
9. Limitations and Future Research Directions
While this study provides valuable insights into HDI-DV integration in healthcare settings, several limitations should be noted:
The proposed framework requires empirical validation through implementation studies
The healthcare focus may limit generalizability to other domains
The rapidly evolving nature of both HDI and DV technologies means some findings may need regular updates
The study’s scope did not include emerging technologies like artificial intelligence and blockchain
These limitations suggest several promising directions for future research:
Empirical validation studies of the proposed framework
Comparative analysis of HDI-DV implementation across different healthcare settings
Investigation of emerging technologies’ impact on HDI-DV integration
Development of standardized metrics for evaluating HDI effectiveness in DV implementations
10. Conclusions and Future Work
This article has presented a systematic analysis of the integration between Human-Data Interaction (HDI) and Data Virtualization (DV), with a particular emphasis on healthcare applications while drawing supporting insights from the financial and educational sectors. Through careful examination of existing implementations and proposed frameworks, we have demonstrated how DV can enhance HDI principles while addressing critical challenges in data accessibility, integration, and user empowerment [
9,
14].
The in-depth analysis of healthcare applications revealed several critical insights. First, the successful implementation of DV in healthcare environments requires careful attention to clinical workflow integration, real-time data access, and strict privacy requirements [
29,
40]. Second, the integration of diverse medical data formats while maintaining HIPAA compliance demonstrates how technical capabilities can be balanced with human-centered design principles. Third, the healthcare sector’s experience with user interface design and data governance provides valuable lessons for other domains [
42,
45].
Supporting analyses from the financial and educational sectors reinforced these findings while highlighting sector-specific considerations. The financial sector’s emphasis on real-time data processing and regulatory compliance [
23], combined with education’s focus on personalization and privacy protection [
38], demonstrates how DV implementations must be tailored to specific domain requirements while maintaining core HDI principles.
Our proposed research framework and study designs provide a foundation for future empirical validation of these findings. The healthcare-focused methodology, with its emphasis on technical implementation considerations, user interface design principles, and specific implementation challenges, offers a template for similar studies in other domains [
41,
65].
Several important challenges remain for future research. First, the development of standardized metrics for evaluating the effectiveness of HDI-enhanced DV implementations would facilitate more rigorous comparative analyses across sectors. Second, further investigation is needed into how emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, can be integrated into DV systems while maintaining HDI principles [
43]. Finally, the evolution of privacy regulations and data protection requirements will continue to shape how organizations implement and manage DV solutions [
8].
The integration of HDI principles with DV technologies represents a significant opportunity to improve how organizations and individuals interact with complex data systems. By learning from healthcare’s experience while incorporating insights from finance and education, organizations can develop more effective, user-centric data solutions that balance technical capabilities with human needs and preferences. As data continues to play an increasingly central role in decision-making across sectors, the importance of human-centered design in data virtualization will only grow [
3,
16].
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the preparation and analysis of the article, as well as the drafting of the manuscript.
Funding
This work has received partial support from the National Project granted by the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Spain, under Grant PID2022-140974OB-I00, and from the Regional Government (JCCM) and the European Regional Development Funds (ERDF) through the INTECRA Project under Grant SBPLY/21/180501/000056.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work presented in this article.
References
- Sharma, D. Toward a new foundation of human-computer interaction 2011. [CrossRef]
- Sattar, M.U.; Palaniappan, S.; Lokman, A.; Hassan, A.; Shah, N.; Riaz, Z. Effects of Virtual Reality training on medical students’ learning motivation and competency. Professional Medical Publications 2019, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Antonova, D.; Kostadinova, I.; Venelinova, N.; Kostadinova, I. Data Management Conceptual Algorithm of Transnational Digital Scientific Infrastructure as an Answer to the Globalization Challenges. EDP Sciences 2021, 92, 05002–05002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gandomi, A.H.; Haider, M. Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. Elsevier BV 2015, 35, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- danah boyd.; Crawford, K. CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA. Routledge 2012, 15, 662–679.
- Smith, M.; Szongott, C.; Henne, B.; Voigt, G. Big data privacy issues in public social media 2012.
- Weinhardt, M. Big Data: Some Ethical Concerns for the Social Sciences. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 2021, 10, 36–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharjee, K.; Chen, M.; Dasgupta, A. Privacy-Preserving Data Visualization: Reflections on the State of the Art and Research Opportunities. Wiley-Blackwell 2020, 39, 675–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mortier, R.; Haddadi, H.; Henderson, T.; McAuley, D.; Crowcroft, J. Human-Data Interaction: The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society. RELX Group (Netherlands) 2014. [CrossRef]
- van der Lans, R.F. Introduction to Data Virtualization, 2012. [CrossRef]
- Curry, E. Dataspaces: Fundamentals, Principles, and Techniques, 2019. [CrossRef]
- Hendler, J. Data Integration for Heterogenous Datasets. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2014, 2, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seidelin, C.; Dittrich, Y.; Grönvall, E. Data Work in a Knowledge-Broker Organisation: How Cross-Organisational Data Maintenance shapes Human Data Interactions 2018. [CrossRef]
- Victorelli, E.Z.; dos Reis, J.C.; Hornung, H.; Prado, A.B. Understanding human-data interaction: Literature review and recommendations for design. Elsevier BV 2020, 134, 13–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ictorelli, E.Z.; dos Reis, J.C. Human-data interaction design guidelines for visualization systems 2020. [CrossRef]
- Romero, N.; Sharma, M. Designing human data interactions in Healthcare. Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018, 4, 160459–160459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcus, A. Managing metaphors for advanced user interfaces 1994. [CrossRef]
- Lepri, B.; Staiano, J.; Sangokoya, D.; Letouzé, E.; Oliver, N. The Tyranny of Data? The Bright and Dark Sides of Data-Driven Decision-Making for Social Good, 2016.
- Alhakamy, A.; Cafaro, F.; Trajkova, M.; Kankara, S.R.; Mallappa, R.; Veda, S. Design Strategies and Optimizations for Human-Data Interaction Systems in Museums 2020. [CrossRef]
- Gray, J.; Gerlitz, C.; Bounegru, L. Data infrastructure literacy. Big Data AND Society 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Patel, V.; Johnson, K.A.; Malin, J.; Smith, J.W. Designing Human-Centered Distributed Information Systems. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2002, 17, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso-Valerdi, L.; Mercado-García, V.R. Enrichment of Human-Computer Interaction in Brain-Computer Interfaces via Virtual Environments. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, A.; Harinarayan, V.; Rajaraman, A. Virtual database technology. Association for Computing Machinery 1997, 26, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Lans, R.F. Deploying Data Virtualization in Business Intelligence Systems, 2012. [CrossRef]
- Radchenko, G.; Alaasam, A.B.A.; Tchernykh, A. Comparative Analysis of Virtualization Methods in Big Data Processing. Supercomput. Front. Innov. 2019, 6, 48–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widjojo, E.A.; Chinthammit, W.; Engelke, U. Virtual Reality-Based Human-Data Interaction. 2017 International Symposium on Big Data Visual Analytics (BDVA) 2017, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
- Ooi, B.C.; Chen, G.; Shou.; Zheng, M.; Tan, K.L.; Tung, A.K.H.; Xiao, X.; Yip, J.; Zhang, B.; undefined, M.Z. The Metaverse Data Deluge: What Can We Do About It?, 2023.
- Reeve, A. Introduction to Big Data Integration, 2013. [CrossRef]
- Wheatley, B. Transforming Care Delivery through Health Information Technology. The Permanente Press 2013, 17, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odhiambo, J.N.; Ochara, N.M. Precision Health Care for Sustainable Patient Centric Solutions 2018. [CrossRef]
- Abrahams, E.; Silver, M. The Case for Personalized Medicine. SAGE Publishing 2009, 3, 680–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soundararajan, V.; Anderson, J.M. The impact of management operations on the virtualized datacenter 2010. [CrossRef]
- Feit, E.M.; Wang, P.; Bradlow, E.T.; Fader, P. Fusing Aggregate and Disaggregate Data with an Application to Multiplatform Media Consumption. Journal of Marketing Research 2013, 50, 348–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muniswamaiah, M.; Agerwala, T.; Tappert, C.C. Data Virtualization for Decision Making in Big Data 2019. 10, 45–53. [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.; Rosen, D.W.; Wang, L.; Schaefer, D. Cloud-based Manufacturing: Old Wine in New Bottles? Elsevier BV 2014, 17, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Institutions’ Use of Data and Analytics for Student Success, 2018.
- Nestler, V.; Bose, D. Leveraging Advances in Remote Virtualization to Improve Online Instruction of Information Assurance 2011. [CrossRef]
- Klement, M. Models of integration of virtualization in education: Virtualization technology and possibilities of its use in education. Elsevier BV 2017, 105, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeRubeis, R.; Cohen, Z.; Forand, N.R.; Fournier, J.; Gelfand, L.; Lorenzo-Luaces, L. The Personalized Advantage Index: Translating Research on Prediction into Individualized Treatment Recommendations. A Demonstration. PLoS ONE 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dash, S.; Shakyawar, S.K.; Sharma, M.; Kaushik, S. Big data in healthcare: management, analysis and future prospects. Springer Science+Business Media 2019, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldwin, R.O.; Danis, M. A unified, clinician-focused "packets-to-patients" measurement approach for meaningful and usable electronic health records 2015. [CrossRef]
- Phillips-Wren, G.; McKniff, S. Overcoming Resistance to Big Data and Operational Changes Through Interactive Data Visualization. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2020, 8, 528–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhavnani, S.P.; Parakh, K.; Atreja, A.; Druz, R.S.; Graham, G.; Hayek, S.S.; Krumholz, H.M.; Maddox, T.M.; Majmudar, M.D.; Rumsfeld, J.S.; Shah, B.R. 2017 Roadmap for Innovation—ACC Health Policy Statement on Healthcare Transformation in the Era of Digital Health, Big Data, and Precision Health. Elsevier BV 2017, 70, 2696–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zillner, S.; Oberkampf, H.; Bretschneider, C.; Zaveri, A.; Faix, W.G.; Neururer, S. Towards a technology roadmap for big data applications in the healthcare domain 2014. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Kung, L.; Ting, C.; Byrd, T.A. Beyond a Technical Perspective: Understanding Big Data Capabilities in Health Care 2015. [CrossRef]
- Cahan, E.M.; Hernandez-Boussard, T.; Thadaney-Israni, S.; Rubin, D. Putting the data before the algorithm in big data addressing personalized healthcare. NPJ Digital Medicine 2019, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ko, S.; Cho, I.; Afzal, S.; Yau, C.; Chae, J.; Malik, A.; Beck, K.; Jang, Y.; Ribarsky, W.; Ebert, D. A Survey on Visual Analysis Approaches for Financial Data. Computer Graphics Forum 2016, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishkin, F.S. Financial consolidation: Dangers and opportunities. Journal of Banking and Finance 1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cerchiello, P.; Giudici, P.; Nicola, G. Twitter data models for bank risk contagion. Neurocomputing 2017, 264, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Özsoy, M.G.; Polat, F.; Alhajj, R. Making recommendations by integrating information from multiple social networks. Applied Intelligence 2016, 45, 1047–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, S.; Umirzakova, S.; Mujtaba, G.; Amin, M.; undefined, T.K.W. Education 5.0: Requirements, Enabling Technologies, and Future Directions, 2023.
- Lakkaraju, H.; Aguiar, E.; Shan, C.; Miller, D.P.; Bhanpuri, N.H.; Ghani, R.; Addison, K.L. A Machine Learning Framework to Identify Students at Risk of Adverse Academic Outcomes 2015. [CrossRef]
- Greenwald, R.; Hedges, L.; Laine, R.D. The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement. Review of Educational Research 1996, 66, 361–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, R.; Tian, M.; Tang, Q. The Design of Personalized Education Resource Recommendation System under Big Data. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2022, 2022, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolf, M.A.; Jones, R.; Hall, S.; Wise, B. Capacity Enablers and Barriers for Learning Analytics: Implications for Policy and Practice. 2014.
- Evaluation of Support for Using Student Data to Inform Teachers’ Instruction, 2018.
- Gotz, D.; Borland, D. Data-Driven Healthcare: Challenges and Opportunities for Interactive Visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 2016, 36, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barreto, P.; Salgado, L.; Filho, J.V. Transparency Communication Strategies in Human-Data Interaction. Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widjojo, E.A.; Chinthammit, W.; Engelke, U. Virtual Reality-Based Human-Data Interaction 2017.
- Sandoval, J.C.B.; de Santana, V.F.; Berger, S.; Quigley, L.T.; Hobson, S. Responsible and Inclusive Technology Framework: A Formative Framework to Promote Societal Considerations in Information Technology Contexts, 2023. [CrossRef]
- Zieglmeier, Valentin, A.P.u. Trustworthy Transparency by Design, 2021.
- Cortés, J.; Dullerud, G.; Han, S.; Ny, J.L.; Mitra, S.; Pappas, G.J. Differential privacy in control and network systems. 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2016, pp. 4252–4272.
- Brunner, H. Usage case for the design of an Asian Regional Economic Integration Observatory, 2016. [CrossRef]
- Asri, H.; Mousannif, H.; Moatassime, H.A.; Zahir, J. Big Data and Reality Mining in Healthcare: Promise and Potential, 2020. [CrossRef]
- Nasir, I.S.; Mousa, A.H.; Alkhafaji, S.M.A.; Hussein, W.; Jasim, Z.R.; Ali, S. Virtual data integration for a clinical decision support systems. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES) 2023, 13, 5243–5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).