Preprint Hypothesis Version 2 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Disproving Two Widely Accepted Notions Regarding Entropy

Version 1 : Received: 8 April 2024 / Approved: 9 April 2024 / Online: 9 April 2024 (11:54:29 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 11 April 2024 / Approved: 12 April 2024 / Online: 12 April 2024 (14:38:00 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 25 April 2024 / Approved: 25 April 2024 / Online: 26 April 2024 (07:54:58 CEST)

How to cite: Chen, J.; Chen, J. Disproving Two Widely Accepted Notions Regarding Entropy. Preprints 2024, 2024040655. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0655.v2 Chen, J.; Chen, J. Disproving Two Widely Accepted Notions Regarding Entropy. Preprints 2024, 2024040655. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202404.0655.v2

Abstract

This article systematically disproves the notion that entropy is a measure of disorder and disproves Schrödinger's notion of negative entropy (negentropy) using multiple novel and compelling arguments. To mathematically describe the second law of thermodynamics, the concept of entropy was created and defined in the 1860s as heat energy divided by thermodynamic temperature, and the entropy of an object increases when it absorbs heat. This is the uncontroversial and fundamental nature of entropy, which is pivotal to current thermodynamics and from which multiple facts are deduced. These facts consistently disprove the above two widely accepted notions. Multiple biological facts (e.g., life orderliness is encoded and provided by inherited genes rather than entropy decline) can also disprove Schrödinger's negentropy notion. This article further elucidates the reasoning errors of the two notions. Moreover, the second law of thermodynamics and the notion that many natural or social systems tend to become more disordered over time result from distinct statistical probabilities and are hence independent of each other.

Keywords

disorder; energy; entropy; life, negative entropy, probability, thermodynamics

Subject

Physical Sciences, Thermodynamics

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.