Submitted:
02 April 2024
Posted:
03 April 2024
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Methods
Patient Selection and Characteristics
Tumor Characteristics
Treatment
Biologically Effective Dose (BED), Single-Fraction Equivalent Dose (SFED), and Equivalent Total Doses in 2-Gy Fractions (EQD2)
Follow-up
3. Results:
Patient Demographics and Characteristics
Local Tumor Control
Patient Survival
Progression-Free Survival
Symptomatic Outcome
Adverse Radiation Effect (ARE)
4. Discussion
Local Tumor Control
Patient Survival and Progression-Free Survival
Symptomatic Outcomes
Adverse Radiation Effects
Integration with Previous Studies
Limitations and Future Directions
5. Conclusion
Funding
Ethics approval
Consent for publication
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
Code availability
Consent to participate
Conference Presentations
References
- Martin, A.M.; Raabe, E.; Eberhart, C.; Cohen, K.J. Management of pediatric and adult patients with medulloblastoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2014, 15, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Northcott, P.A.; Robinson, G.W.; Kratz, C.P. , et al. Medulloblastoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019, 5, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoo, K.H.; Park, D.J.; Choi, J.H. , et al. Optimizing the synergy between stereotactic radiosurgery and immunotherapy for brain metastases. Front Oncol. 2023, 13, 1223599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thomas, A.; Noël, G. Medulloblastoma: optimizing care with a multidisciplinary approach. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2019, 12, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramaswamy, V.; Remke, M.; Bouffet, E. , et al. Recurrence patterns across medulloblastoma subgroups: an integrated clinical and molecular analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14, 1200–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Bree, N.F.H.N.; Wilhelm, M. The Tumor Microenvironment of Medulloblastoma: An Intricate Multicellular Network with Therapeutic Potential. Cancers . 2022, 14, 5009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, K.H.; Park, D.J.; Marianayagam, N.J., et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cranial and Spinal Hemangioblastomas: A Single-Institution Retrospective Series. Neurosurgery. 2023. [CrossRef]
- Zeng, M.; Han, L.F. Stereotactic radiosurgery: a “targeted” therapy for cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2012, 31, 471–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Choi, C.Y.H.; Soltys, S.G.; Gibbs, I.C. , et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery of cranial nonvestibular schwannomas: results of single- and multisession radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2011, 68, 1200–1208, discussion 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, S.; Jin, M.C.; Koenig, J. , et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Pediatric and Adult Intracranial and Spinal Ependymomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2019, 97, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fowler, J.F. 21 years of biologically effective dose. Br J Radiol. 2010, 83, 554–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, V.; Kulkarni, R.R.; Bhirud, A.R.; Bennion, N.R.; McComb, R.D.; Lin, C. Metachronous medulloblastoma and glioblastoma: Implications for clinical and technical aspects of re-irradiation. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016, 21, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Joiner, M.C.; van der Kogel, A.J. Basic Clinical Radiobiology. CRC Press; 2018.
- Anderson, V.; Spencer-Smith, M.; Wood, A. Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult. Brain. 2011, 134, 2197–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roussel, M.F.; Hatten, M.E. Cerebellum development and medulloblastoma. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2011, 94, 235–282. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Peyrl, A.; Chocholous, M.; Sabel, M. , et al. Sustained Survival Benefit in Recurrent Medulloblastoma by a Metronomic Antiangiogenic Regimen: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023, 9, 1688–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooney, T.; Lindsay, H.; Leary, S.; Wechsler-Reya, R. Current studies and future directions for medulloblastoma: A review from the pacific pediatric neuro-oncology consortium (PNOC) disease working group. Neoplasia. 2023, 35, 100861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suh, J.H.; Barnett, G.H. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain tumors in pediatric patients. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2003, 2, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Management and Long-term Outcomes of Adults With Medulloblastoma. Neurology. Accessed January 2, 2024. https://www.neurology.org/doi/full/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207631?casa_token=IwzRtTLffBMAAAAA:qD0QXqjsWZuJ20jlSRUZVTswiTOE_-_2NFRy3c-BrecfeltHpGRIby9NtCpkigblcAVwd-xS_zP3. January.
- Edelstein, K.; Spiegler, B.J.; Fung, S. , et al. Early aging in adult survivors of childhood medulloblastoma: long-term neurocognitive, functional, and physical outcomes. Neuro Oncol. 2011, 13, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chan, A.W.; Tarbell, N.J.; Black, P.M. , et al. Adult medulloblastoma: prognostic factors and patterns of relapse. Neurosurgery. 2000, 47, 623–631. [Google Scholar]
- King, D.; Connolly, D.; Zaki, H.; Lee, V.; Yeomanson, D. Successful treatment of metastatic relapse of medulloblastoma in childhood with single session stereotactic radiosurgery: a report of 3 cases. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2014, 36, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoo, K.H.; Marianayagam, N.J.; Park, D.J. , et al. P11. 48. A STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR EPENDYMOMA IN PEDIATRIC AND ADULT PATIENTS: A SINGLE-INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE. Neuro Oncol. 2023, 25, ii84–ii85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wooley, J.R.; Penas-Prado, M. Pediatric versus Adult Medulloblastoma: Towards a Definition That Goes beyond Age. Cancers . 2021, 13, 6313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gregory, T.A.; Mastall, M.; Lin, H. , et al. Characterization of recurrence patterns and outcomes of medulloblastoma in adults: The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Neurooncol Adv. 2023, 5, vdad032. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Peña-Pino, I.; Chen, C.C. Stereotactic Radiosurgery as Treatment for Brain Metastases: An Update. Asian J Neurosurg. 2023, 18, 246–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osuna-Marco, M.P.; Martín-López, L.I.; Tejera, Á.M.; López-Ibor, B. Questions and answers in the management of children with medulloblastoma over the time. How did we get here? A systematic review. A systematic review. Front Oncol. 2023, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, F.Y.; Rosenblum, J.S.; Ho, W.S.; Heiss, J.D. New Developments in the Pathogenesis, Therapeutic Targeting, and Treatment of Pediatric Medulloblastoma. Cancers . 2022, 14, 2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wetmore, C.; Herington, D.; Lin, T.; Onar-Thomas, A.; Gajjar, A.; Merchant, T.E. Reirradiation of recurrent medulloblastoma: does clinical benefit outweigh risk for toxicity? Cancer. 2014, 120, 3731–3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hill, R.M.; Plasschaert, S.L.A.; Timmermann, B. , et al. Relapsed Medulloblastoma in Pre-Irradiated Patients: Current Practice for Diagnostics and Treatment. Cancers . 2021, 14, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Napieralska, A.; Brąclik, I.; Radwan, M.; Mandera, M.; Blamek, S. Radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy after craniospinal irradiation in children and adults with medulloblastoma and ependymoma. Childs Nerv Syst. 2019, 35, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, A.L.; Moding, E.J.; Donaldson, S.S. , et al. Survival impact of postoperative radiotherapy timing in pediatric and adolescent medulloblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018, 20, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodgson, D.C.; Goumnerova, L.C.; Loeffler, J.S. , et al. Radiosurgery in the management of pediatric brain tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001, 50, 929–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, E.S.; Merchant, T.E.; Wu, S. , et al. Necrosis after craniospinal irradiation: results from a prospective series of children with central nervous system embryonal tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012, 83, e655–e660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Robinson, G.W.; Rudneva, V.A.; Buchhalter, I. , et al. Risk-adapted therapy for young children with medulloblastoma (SJYC07): therapeutic and molecular outcomes from a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 768–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cohen, M.E.; Duffner, P.K.; Terplan, K.L. Myelopathy with severe structural derangement associated with combined modality therapy. Cancer. 1983, 52, 1590–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]


| Characteristics | Entire Cohort | Pediatric | Adult |
|---|---|---|---|
| # patients | 10 (100%) | 8 (80%) | 2 (20%) |
| Sex | |||
| Male | 8 (80%) | 6 (75%) | 2 (100%) |
| Female | 2 (20%) | 2 (25%) | 0 (0%) |
| Prior Surgery | |||
| Single | 6 (60%) | 6 (75%) | 0 (0%) |
| Multiple | 3 (30%) | 1 (12.5%) | 2 (100%) |
| Symptoms | |||
| Headaches | 6 (60%) | 4 (50%) | 2 (100%) |
| Nausea | 4 (40%) | 4 (50%) | 1 (50%) |
| Vomiting | 5 (50%) | 4 (50%) | 1 (50%) |
| Ataxia | 3 (30%) | 1 (12.5%) | 2 (100%) |
| Visual impairment | 3 (30%) | 2 (25%) | 1 (50%) |
| Seizure | 2 (20%) | 2 (25%) | 0 (0%) |
| Left-sided dysmetria | 1 (10%) | 1 (12.5%) | 0 (0%) |
| Peripheral rigidity | 1 (10%) | 1 (12.5%) | 0 (0%) |
| # tumors | 15 (100%) | 13 (86.7%) | 2 (13.3%) |
| Location | |||
| Cerebellar | 5 (33.3%) | 4 (30.8%) | 1 (50%) |
| Ventricular | 2 (13.3%) | 1 (7.7%) | 1 (50%) |
| Frontal | 2 (13.3%) | 2 (15.4%) | 0 (0%) |
| Parietal | 2 (13.3%) | 2 (15.4%) | 0 (0%) |
| Temporal | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) |
| Thalamic | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) |
| Cervicomedullary | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) |
| Medullary | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) |
| Clinical Presentation | |||
| Symptomatic | 14 (93.3%) | 12 (92.3%) | 2 (100%) |
| Asymptomatic | 1 (6.7%) | 1 (7.7%) | 0 (0%) |
| #, numbers | |||
| Characteristics | Entire Cohort | Pediatric | Adult | Statistical Significance (p Values) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # tumors per patient | 0.4 | |||
| Mean | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1 | |
| Median | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| Range | 1-4 | 1-4 | 1 | |
| Age at Treatment, yrs | ||||
| Mean | 14.3 | 12.4 | 27 | < 0.001 |
| Median | 13 | 12 | 27 | |
| Range | 9-29 | 9-16 | 25-29 | |
| Interval between Diagnosis to SRS, mo | ||||
| Mean | 42.7 | 45.5 | 24.5 | |
| Median | 30 | 39 | 24.5 | 0.4 |
| Range | 12-108 | 12-108 | 24-25 | |
| Target Tumor Volume, cc | ||||
| Mean | 2.7 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 0.51 |
| Median | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.5 | |
| Range | 0.02-8.7 | 0.02-8.7 | 0.5-2.5 | |
| Margin Dose, Gy | ||||
| 1 Fraction | 0.8 | |||
| Mean | 17.8 | 17.8 | 18 | |
| Median | 18 | 18 | 18 | |
| Range | 14-20 | 14-20 | 18 | |
| 2 Fractions | ||||
| Mean | 20 | 20 | N/A | |
| Median | 20 | 20 | N/A | |
| Range | 20 | 20 | N/A | |
| 3 Fractions | ||||
| Mean | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Median | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Range | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| 4 Fractions | ||||
| Mean | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Median | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Range | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| 5 Fractions | ||||
| Mean | 25 | 25 | N/A | |
| Median | 25 | 25 | N/A | |
| Range | 25 | 25 | N/A | |
| Maximum Dose, Gy | ||||
| 1 Fraction | 0.9 | |||
| Mean | 23.3 | 23.1 | 24.2 | |
| Median | 24.2 | 24.2 | 24.2 | |
| Range | 19.7-25 | 19.7-25 | 24.2-24.3 | |
| 2 Fractions | ||||
| Mean | 30.8 | 65 | N/A | |
| Median | 30.8 | 65 | N/A | |
| Range | 30.8 | 65 | N/A | |
| 3 Fractions | ||||
| Mean | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Median | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Range | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| 4 Fractions | ||||
| Mean | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Median | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Range | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| 5 Fractions | ||||
| Mean | 35.7 | 70 | N/A | |
| Median | 35.7 | 70 | N/A | |
| Range | 35.7 | 70 | N/A | |
| # Fraction | ||||
| Mean | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1 | |
| Median | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.6 |
| Range | 1-5 | 1-5 | 1 | |
| BED, Gy | ||||
| Mean | 118.1 | 117 | 126 | |
| Median | 126 | 126 | 126 | 0.7 |
| Range | 66.7-153.3 | 66.7-153.3 | 126 | |
| SFED | ||||
| Mean | 17.2 | 17.1 | 18 | |
| Median | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0.6 |
| Range | 12.7-20 | 12.7-20 | 18 | |
| EQD2 | ||||
| Mean | 70.8 | 70.2 | 75.6 | |
| Median | 75.6 | 75.6 | 75.6 | 0.7 |
| Range | 40-92 | 40-92 | 75.6 | |
| Isodose Line, % | ||||
| Mean | 74.9 | 74.9 | 74.5 | 0.9 |
| Median | 75 | 75 | 74.5 | |
| Range | 65-81 | 65-81 | 74-75 | |
| Follow Up, mo | ||||
| Mean | 35.6 | 36.5 | 29.5 | 0.6 |
| Median | 39 | 39 | 29.5 | |
| Range | 6-78 | 6-78 | 9-50 | |
| #, number; BED, biologically effective dose; SFED, single-fraction equivalent dose; EQD2, equivalent total doses in 2-Gy fractions; N/A, not applicable; cc, cubic centimeter; Gy, Gray; mo, months; yrs, years | ||||
| Variables | Entire Series | Pediatric | Adult | Statistical Significance(p Value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTC | ||||
| 3 yrs, % | 65 | 67 | 50 | 0.05 |
| OS | ||||
| 3 yrs, % | 70 | 75 | 50 | 0.24 |
| mean, mo | 47.4 | 47.4 | 0 | |
| PFS | ||||
| 3 yrs, % | 58 | 60 | 50 | 0.46 |
| mean, mo | 42.3 | 42.3 | 0 | |
| SI, % | 70 | 75 | 50 | 0.05 |
| SW, % | 10 | 12.5 | 50 | 0.03 |
| NS, % | 10 | 0 | 50 | < 0.001 |
| LTC, local tumor control; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; SI, symptomatic improvement; SW, symptomatic worsening; NS, new symptoms; yrs, years; mo, months | ||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).