Submitted:
01 April 2024
Posted:
02 April 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Machining of Blisk Blades
2.1. Blisk Machining Parameters
2.2. Material
2.3. Experimental Equipment
2.3.1. Machine Tool
2.3.2. Cutting Tools
2.3.3. Sensory Tool Holder
2.3.4. Digital Microscope
3. Finish Machining Strategy and Method
3.1. Cutting Speed
3.1.1. Processing Conditions and Parameters
3.1.2. Cutting Signal Capture and Analysis
3.1.3. Tool Wear and Cutting Moment
3.2. Feed Per Tooth
3.2.1. Processing Conditions and Parameters
3.2.2. Cutting Signal Capture and Analysis
3.2.3. Tool Wear and Cutting Moment
4. Tool Life Test
4.1. Assessment of Surface Roughness
4.2. Repetitive Experiments
4.3. Bending Moment and Tool Wear
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alauddin, M.; El Baradie, M.; Hashmi, M. Tool-life testing in the end milling of Inconel 718. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1995, 55, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, C.; Su, S.; Chen, S. Tool life and surface integrity when milling inconel 718 with coated cemented carbide tools. J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 2010, 33, 915–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, O.; Urbikain, G.; Rodríguez, A.; Fernández-Valdivielso, A.; Calleja, A.; Ayesta, I.; De Lacalle, L.L. Internal cryolubrication approach for Inconel 718 milling. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, O.; Celaya, A.; Urbikaín, G.; Rodríguez, A.; Fernández-Valdivielso, A.; de Lacalle, L.N.L. CO2 cryogenic milling of Inconel 718: cutting forces and tool wear. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 8459–8468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurşuncu, B.; Çay, V.V. Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on cutting performance in Inconel 718 milling. IENSC 2019, 948–953. [Google Scholar]
- Krain, H.; Sharman, A.; Ridgway, K. Optimisation of tool life and productivity when end milling Inconel 718TM. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2007, 189, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szablewski, P.; Dobrowolski, T.; Chwalczuk, T. Optimization of Inconel 718 milling strategies. Mechanik 2019, 92, 824–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, S.Y.; Yang, B.H. Experimental Study of Cutting Performance for Inconel 718 Milling by Various Assisted Machining Techniques. Solid State Phenom. 2019, 294, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, C.C.; Chang, C.L.; Ou, N.R.; Lin, C.Y. CAE Analysis of Primary Shaft Systems in Great Five-Axis Turning-Milling Complex CNC Machine. Proc. eng. technol. innov. 2019, 12, 01–08. [Google Scholar]
- Hong, C.C.; Chang, C.L.; Huang, C.C.; Yang, C.C.; Lin, C.Y. CAE Analysis of Secondary Shaft Systems in Great Five-axis Turning-Milling Complex CNC Machine. Adv. technol. innov. 2017, 3, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, C.G.; Zhang, D.H.; Ren, J.X.; Yang, L. Research on the 5-axis Machining of Blisk. Mater. Sci. Forum 2006, 532-533, 612–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.C.; Liu, X.L.; Yue, C.X.; Cheng, Y.N.; Zhang, H. Tool Path Planning of 5-Axis Finishing Milling Machining for Closed Blisk. Mater. Sci. Forum 2012, 723, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.A.; Ding, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhu, L. Tool path generation for five-axis machining of blisks with barrel cutters. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 57, 1300–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, C.W.; Zhang, D.H.; Ren, J.X.; Hu, C.G. Research on the Plunge Milling Techniques for Open Blisks. Mater. Sci. Forum 2006, 532–533, 193–196.
- Luo, M.; Hah, C.; Hafeez, H.M. Four-axis trochoidal toolpath planning for rough milling of aero-engine blisks. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2018, 32, 2009–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.H.; Lee, J.N.; Tsai, M.H.; Shie, M.J.; Lin, C.Y. Optimization of milling parameters based on five-axis machining for centrifugal impeller with titanium alloy. J. Physics: Conf. Ser. 2022, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, Y.; Lin, H.; Wang, J. Behaviors of end milling Inconel 718 superalloy by cemented carbide tools. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2008, 201, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xitron Innovation, Co. Ltd. https://www.ixitron.com/ (accessed 22). 20 October.
- Sharman, A.; Dewes, R.C.; Aspinwall, D.K. Tool life when high speed ball nose end milling Inconel 718™. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2001, 118, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jen Wu Cheng Shun Turning Tool, CO. LTD. http://www.jsk-tools.com.tw/ (accessed 22). 20 October.
- Lu, Z.; Wang, M.; Dai, W. Machined Surface Quality Monitoring Using a Wireless Sensory Tool Holder in the Machining Process. Sensors 2019, 19, 1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsai, M.-H.; Lee, J.-N.; Shie, M.-J.; Deng, M.-H. Intelligent Performance Prediction of Flank Milling of Ti6Al4V Using Sensory Tool Holder. Sensors Mater. 2022, 34, 3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daymi, A.; Boujelbene, M.; Linares, J.M.; Bayraktar, E.; Amara, A. Influence of workpiece inclination angle on the surface roughness in ball end milling of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. J. Achiev. Mater. Manuf. Eng. 2009, 35, 79–86. [Google Scholar]
















| Property | Values |
|---|---|
| Density (g/cm3) | 8.19 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 |
| Young's Modulus (GPa) | 200 |
| Ultimate Stress (MPa) | 860 |
| Yield Stress (MPa) | 551 |
| Elongation (%) | 51.7 |
| Hardness (HRB) | 97.7 |
| Thermal Conductivity (W/m.K) | 11.2 |
| Property/Composition | Values |
|---|---|
| Shank Diameter (mm) Tool Nose Ridus (mm) Over length (mm) Cutting length (mm) Single Side Angel (degree) Flutes Material Coating |
6 1.5 75 20 3 2 Tungsten Carbide AlTiN |
| Property | Values |
|---|---|
| Measuring frequency (Hz) Maximum allowable speed (rpm) Operating temperature (℃) Collet size Spindle taper Total length (mm) |
2500 18000 0–50 ER20 BBT-40 155 |
| Cutting Speed Vc (m/min) |
Effective Cutting Speed Ve (m/min) |
Feed per Tooth Fz (mm/tooth) |
Depth of Cut Ap (mm) |
Time (min:sec) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. 1 | 26 | 19.33 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 56:25 |
| Exp. 2 | 36 | 25.38 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 40:53 |
| Exp. 3 | 46 | 32.43 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 32:08 |
| Exp. 4 | 56 | 39.48 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 26:26 |
| Exp. 5 | 66 | 46.53 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 22:30 |
| Exp. 6 | 76 | 53.59 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 19:43 |
| Exp. 7 | 91 | 64.16 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 16:48 |
| Exp. 8 | 96 | 67.69 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 16:06 |
| Cutting Speed Vc (m/min) |
Effective Cutting Speed Ve (m/min) |
Feed per Tooth Fz (mm/tooth) |
Depth of Cut Ap (mm) |
Time (min:sec) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. 9 | 66 | 46.53 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 22:30 |
| Exp. 10 | 66 | 46.53 | 0.075 | 0.05 | 16:36 |
| Exp. 11 | 66 | 46.53 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 13:02 |
| Exp. 12 | 76 | 53.59 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 19:43 |
| Exp. 13 | 76 | 53.59 | 0.075 | 0.05 | 14:09 |
| Exp. 14 | 76 | 53.59 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 12:14 |
| Cutting Speed Vc (m/min) |
Effective Cutting Speed Ve (m/min) |
Feed per Tooth Fz (mm/tooth) |
Depth of Cut Ap (mm) |
Time (min:sec) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. 15~26 | 66 | 46.53 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 13:02 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).