Research Highlights:
Investigate the theoretical principles of osmosis and vapor pressure gradients in energy generation.
Optimize materials and design for the membrane and solutions to enhance efficiency.
Examine the effects of solute concentration and gas solubility on energy output.
Evaluate energy production and environmental sustainability of the Evosmosis Cycle.
Explore scalability and applications for real-world renewable energy solutions.
1. Introduction
Global energy demand continues to climb, driven by population expansion, industrialization, and an increasing reliance on technology in daily life. However, traditional energy sources, particularly fossil fuels, provide substantial environmental challenges. Climate change, air pollution, and resource depletion are among the most pressing concerns linked to the continued reliance on these energy sources. In response to these environmental challenges, there has been a concerted effort to develop and deploy sustainable energy technologies. Among the most prominent renewable energy sources are solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, which harness nature’s forces to generate electricity without the direct emissions associated with fossil fuels. One such promising alternative is to harness ambient thermal energy—an abundant, low-grade energy source found in the surrounding environment. Ambient thermal energy, which is available at normal temperatures, has the potential to be employed as a renewable energy source. Unlike solar or wind energy, which require specific geographic conditions, ambient thermal energy is available almost everywhere, making it a universally accessible and highly scalable energy source. Yet, extracting usable energy from this low-grade thermal source remains a significant challenge. Most conventional systems require significant temperature gradients or external energy inputs to operate efficiently, limiting their ability to convert ambient thermal energy into useful power. The Evosmosis Cycle functions as a closed system, with two chambers separated by a selectively permeable membrane. Each chamber holds a solution with varying amounts of solute. Because of the nature of osmosis, the lower concentration chamber undergoes more evaporation, resulting in a higher vapor pressure in that chamber. This vapor passes through the selectively permeable membrane into the high-concentration chamber, where it condenses, resulting in hydrostatic pressure. This pressure difference causes reverse osmosis, which forces water back into the low-concentration chamber. This cyclical process provides a continuous flow of energy that, when combined with a turbine, can be transformed into mechanical or electrical power. The addition of highly soluble gases, such as carbon dioxide, to the system increases the vapor pressure gradient, which improves the evaporation-condensation cycle and increases overall energy production. These gases accelerate the velocity of molecular mobility inside the system, hence enhancing energy conversion efficiency. This innovation opens up the possibility of using alternative solvents with high vapor pressures, such as organic solvents, which can further optimize the performance of the Evosmosis Cycle at room temperature. The Evosmosis Cycle's widespread applicability increases its potential as a transformational energy technology. Because it is not dependent on specific environmental variables such as sunlight or wind, the Evosmosis Cycle can be used in a wide range of situations, from isolated areas to urban centers. Its ability to generate energy at low cost and with minimal environmental impact makes it an ideal solution for off-grid applications, small-scale energy generation, and even as a supplement to existing power grids. The ability to use ambient thermal energy as a fuel source positions the Evosmosis Cycle as a unique and scalable energy technology with the potential to contribute significantly to the global energy mix. Despite its potential, the Evosmosis Cycle remains in its early phases of development. Additional research is needed to improve the system's efficiency, scalability, and practical applications. Advances in material science, membrane technology, and the incorporation of high-solubility gases, in particular, have the potential to improve system performance while lowering costs. Furthermore, the obstacles of achieving consistent energy output in real-world settings must be addressed by ongoing experimentation and testing.
This study describes the Evosmosis Cycle, a novel technique to sustainable energy generation that utilizes ambient thermal energy via vapor pressure dynamics and osmosis. The Evosmosis Cycle is inspired by natural processes, notably the principles of osmosis and Raoult's law, to construct a self-sustaining energy loop that may generate electricity without the use of high temperature gradients or external energy sources. The Evosmosis Cycle, which combines the natural phenomena of evaporation, condensation, and osmotic pressure, is a revolutionary and innovative technique of energy production that is both environmentally beneficial and economically viable. This work seeks to add to the expanding corpus of research on sustainable energy solutions by conducting a thorough investigation of the Evosmosis Cycle. The project aims to illustrate the feasibility and promise for wide-scale use of this unique approach to energy generation through a combination of theoretical inquiry and experimental validation. As global energy needs continue to rise and the effects of climate change become increasingly visible, technologies like the Evosmosis Cycle might play a significant role in building a more sustainable and energy-efficient.
2. Materials and Method
2.1. Materials
The semipermeable membrane used in the experiment was cellophane dialysis tubing, which allowed selective water passage between two chambers. Tap water was used in the low-solute chamber to keep the solute concentration low, allowing for better evaporation results. The high-solute chamber contained a polymer solution consisting of either 5% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 20,000 or a 2% starch solution to create a higher solute concentration, which facilitated osmotic pressure and enhanced the evaporation-condensation cycle. The system's energy production was increased by introducing carbon dioxide (CO₂) as a gas source in the low-solute chamber. This increased the vapor pressure gradient between the chambers. The arrangement also comprised two chambers joined by a semipermeable membrane, with a valve to control vapor passage between them. To monitor pressure fluctuations and detect pH shifts, two manometers were used: one was a U-shaped tube filled with water and a natural pH indicator generated from red cabbage pigment extract, and the other was a gauge manometer that measured the system's starting gas pressure. An optional tiny turbine was installed in the vapor pathway to determine the potential for energy conversion if the system generated enough mechanical energy.
2.2. Experimental Technique
-
(a)
System Setup
The experimental setup consisted of two chambers, each connected by a semipermeable membrane at the base, and a valve at the top to control vapor flow. The low-solute chamber was filled with tap water, while the high-solute chamber was filled with a polymer solution (5% polyethylene glycol or 2% starch). Carbon dioxide gas was injected into the low-solute chamber to increase the vapor pressure gradient.
-
(b)
Process
The valve was initially closed to allow pressure to equalize between the two chambers.
Upon opening the valve, vapor transfer between the chambers began, with increased evaporation in the low-solute chamber and condensation in the high-solute chamber. This triggered the osmotic process, which was fueled by the vapor pressure gradient.
The pressure differentials between the two chambers were continually monitored with two manometers. The U-shaped tube manometer visually indicated pressure fluctuations, whereas the gauge manometer measured the system's initial gas pressure.
-
(c)
Equilibrium Conditions
The experiment revealed three types of equilibrium: Osmotic equilibrium with air Pressure: When both chambers were exposed to air pressure, equilibrium was achieved through natural osmotic processes between them. Osmotic Equilibrium with Vapor Pressure, when the chambers were closed and isolated, the vapor pressures determined the equilibrium state between them. This status was maintained until additional system modifications were implemented. Osmotic Equilibrium with Soluble Gas Addition, the addition of carbon dioxide (or another highly soluble gas) to the low-solute chamber increased the vapor pressure gradient, which boosted the osmotic and evaporation-condensation processes, shifting the equilibrium state and increasing the system's energy output.
-
(d)
Energy Conversion
A tiny turbine was optionally placed in the vapor passage between the two chambers to determine the system's energy conversion capability. As the vapor moved and pressure differences formed, the turbine was programmed to capture any mechanical energy produced by the evaporation-condensation process. By analyzing the pressure differences, vapor flows, and energy output through this experimental setup, the efficiency of the Evosmosis Cycle was assessed, with particular attention to the influence of solute concentration, gas solubility, and equilibrium states on the overall energy production.
3. Results and Discussion
The experimental setup and subsequent functioning of the Evosmosis Cycle revealed the viability of harvesting ambient thermal energy via the interaction of osmotic pressure, vapor pressure gradients, and phase transitions. The results shed light on the efficiency and practicality of this unique energy generation system. Key observations include vapor transfer behavior, pressure variations between the two chambers, and the effect of the injected soluble gas (carbon dioxide) on system performance.
3.1. Vapor Pressure Gradient and Osmotic Pressure
As expected, the addition of carbon dioxide to the low-solute chamber resulted in a greater vapor pressure difference between the two chambers. This gradient was found to improve the evaporation process in the low-solute chamber, where the vapor pressure was higher due to lower solute concentrations. As the vapor traveled through the semipermeable membrane into the high-solute chamber, condensation occurred, resulting in hydrostatic pressure. This pressure differential was critical for operating the reverse osmosis process, which then returned solvent to the low-solute chamber, completing the cycle. The high-solute chamber generated osmotic pressure, which maintained the concentration gradient and the energy loop. Pressure variations between the two chambers were carefully monitored, and the findings were consistent with theoretical expectations based on Raoult's law and osmotic pressure estimates. The addition of carbon dioxide intensified the vapor pressure gradient, greatly boosting the rate of evaporation in the low-solute chamber. These findings highlight the importance of soluble gases in optimizing the performance of the Evosmosis Cycle. The presence of CO₂ permitted a significant energy flow by lowering the solvent's vapor pressure in the high-solute chamber and boosting condensation.
3.2. Phase Transitions: Evaporation and Condensation
The predicted chambers showed phase transitions for evaporation and condensation. Evaporation was most prevalent in the low-solute chamber, where the vapor pressure was higher due to the lower solute content. As the solvent molecules in the low-solute chamber absorbed enough thermal energy, they entered the vapor phase and went to the high-solute chamber. Condensation happened in the high-solute chamber, where the vapor pressure was low. The condensation process released latent heat, contributing to the hydrostatic pressure that was essential for driving reverse osmosis. The directional flow of vapor from the low-solute to the high-solute chamber created a constant energy cycle. The system required little external input since thermal energy from the environment, along with osmotic and vapor pressure dynamics, kept the cycle going. This result shows that the Evosmosis Cycle can function as a self-sustaining system, relying on ambient thermal energy rather than significant temperature gradients or external energy sources.
3.3. Energy Conversion Potential
During the testing trials, the optional turbine put in the vapor pathway accurately assessed energy conversion. As the vapor traveled through the system and pressure differences formed, the turbine produced mechanical energy. The amount of mechanical energy produced was relatively modest but consistent, validating the potential of the Evosmosis Cycle to generate usable energy from ambient thermal sources. Further examination of the turbine output revealed that optimizing system factors such as solute concentration, introduction of other highly soluble gases, and turbine size might greatly improve energy conversion efficiency. The findings show that, while the Evosmosis Cycle cannot replace high-power generation systems such as solar or wind power, it has tremendous potential for low-energy applications, particularly in off-grid areas or as a supplementary energy source.
3.4. Impact of Soluble Gases
The addition of soluble gases, such as carbon dioxide, was discovered to be an important role in increasing the overall efficiency of the Evosmosis Cycle. Raoult's law predicts that the presence of CO₂ in the low-solute chamber decreases the vapor pressure of the solvent, increasing the vapor pressure gradient between the two chambers. The rise in the vapor pressure gradient hastened evaporation and condensation, resulting in a larger energy output. The system showed that by adjusting the concentration of soluble gases, the evaporation-condensation cycle could be adjusted. Additional studies with various gases or solvents may improve performance even further, perhaps leading to considerable increases in energy generation.
3.5. Challenges and Future Improvements
Despite the promising results, there are still significant hurdles to optimizing the Evosmosis Cycle for larger-scale applications. Improving energy conversion efficiency is one of the most significant challenges. While the system effectively produced mechanical energy via a turbine, the energy production was rather low when compared to more known renewable energy methods. Future developments could include refining the turbine design to capture more energy or integrating larger-scale systems to increase total energy output. Another major difficulty is the system's scalability. While the Evosmosis Cycle works effectively on a small scale, its practical deployment in real-world settings will necessitate additional study into material durability, membrane efficiency, and continuous operation. Long-term viability will require the employment of more durable semipermeable membranes as well as more efficient energy conversion processes.
4. Conclusions
The Evosmosis Cycle harnesses ambient thermal energy to provide an innovative and sustainable approach to energy generation. The cycle creates continuous energy flow by interacting osmosis, vapor pressure gradients, and phase transitions (evaporation and condensation) without the need for external energy inputs or huge temperature gradients. The system functions in a closed loop, relying on the molecular dynamics of evaporation, osmotic pressure, and reverse osmosis to generate energy, marking a substantial divergence from traditional energy systems. The experimental demonstration of the Evosmosis Cycle validates the theoretical framework and emphasizes its viability as an energy generation mechanism. The use of semipermeable membranes to regulate osmotic and reverse osmotic fluxes, together with the higher vapor pressure gradients caused by soluble gases such as carbon dioxide, increases the cycle's overall efficiency. The addition of soluble gases increases the vapor pressure gradient, which increases evaporation rates and improves energy transfer between chambers. This highlights the need of fine-tuning gas kinds and concentrations to improve system performance. The Evosmosis Cycle offers various advantages over standard renewable energy sources. Unlike osmotic power plants, which rely on salt gradients and require specific geographic circumstances, the Evosmosis Cycle can function in any location with ambient heat, making it a versatile energy generation alternative. It does not require external water sources, large-scale infrastructure, or high upfront expenses, making it ideal for off-grid applications, low-energy devices, or as a supplement to current renewable energy systems such as solar and wind power. Furthermore, the utilization of easily available and low-cost materials (such as cellophane membranes and polymer solutions) makes the system scalable and financially viable. The testing results also demonstrated the system's energy conversion capability. Preliminary studies revealed that latent heat from evaporation and condensation could be transformed into mechanical energy using a turbine, implying that the cycle may be modified for practical purposes. The system's ability to constantly create energy at ambient temperature makes it an attractive solution for long-term power generation. The Evosmosis Cycle has great promise as an innovative means of producing sustainable energy. It has the ability to meet the growing demand for renewable energy by relying on ambient thermal energy and using basic, low-cost materials. Continued research and development will be critical in overcoming its existing constraints, increasing efficiency, and scaling the technology for practical applications. With further development, the Evosmosis Cycle could play a significant part in the global transition to sustainable and ecologically friendly energy sources.
References
- Moradi, K. (2024). Evaluation of the Thermo-Osmotic Energy Conversion (TOEC) Process for Harvesting Low-Grade Heat Energy.
- Ali, F. H.; Al-Amir, Q. R.; Hamzah, H. K.; Alahmer, A. Unveiling the potential of solar cooling technologies for sustainable energy and environmental solutions. Energy Conversion and Management 2024, 321, 119034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parekh, R.; Bolivia, D.; Ray, A. A Review on Harnessing Cold Energy for Power Conversion in Sustainability Practice. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024, 205, 114833. [Google Scholar]
- Parekh, R.; Bolivia, D.; Ray, A. A Review on Harnessing Cold Energy for Power Conversion in Sustainability Practice. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2024, 205, 114833. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Addous, M.; Bdour, M.; Rabaiah, S.; Boubakri, A.; Schweimanns, N.; Barbana, N.; Wellmann, J. Innovations in solar-powered desalination: a comprehensive review of sustainable solutions for water scarcity in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Water 2024, 16, 1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsehli, M. Optimizing Solar Desalination: Integrating Predictive Models with Thermal Energy Storage for Enhanced Efficiency and Sustainability. Processes 2024, 12, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farabi, S. N.; Habib, K.; Mim, M.; Zaed, M. A.; Ali, S. A.; Younas, M.; Saidur, R. The future of solar-driven interfacial steam generation for sustainable water desalination: drivers, challenges, and opportunities-Review. Results in Engineering 2024, 102649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Sun, X.; Gao, F.; Yang, Y.; Song, R. Solar membrane distillation: An emerging technology for reverse osmosis concentrated brine treatment. Desalination 2024, 118124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvi, J. Z.; Guan, Z.; Imran, M. Thermoeconomic Evaluation and Sustainability Insights of Hybrid Solar–Biomass Powered Organic Rankine Cycle Systems: A Comprehensive Review. Biomass 2024, 4, 1092–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verma, V.; Thangavel, S.; Dutt, N.; Kumar, A.; Weerasinghe, R. (Eds.). (2024). Highly Efficient Thermal Renewable Energy Systems: Design, Optimization and Applications. CRC Press.
- Alazmi, S.; Xu, Y.; Daqaq, M. F. Harvesting energy from the sloshing motion of ferrofluids in an externally excited container: Analytical modeling and experimental validation. Physics of Fluids 2016, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, X.; Goodnight, D.; Gao, Z.; Cavusoglu, A. H.; Sabharwal, N.; DeLay, M.; ... & Sahin, O. Scaling up nanoscale water-driven energy conversion into evaporation-driven engines and generators. Nature communications 2015, 6, 7346.
- Fu, S.; He, W.; Wu, H.; Shan, C.; Du, Y.; Li, G.; ... & Hu, C. High output performance and ultra-durable DC output for triboelectric nanogenerator inspired by primary cell. Nano-Micro Letters 2022, 14, 155.
- Poláček, J.; Alexa, P. Brownian motion of magnetic nanoparticles as a source of energy? International journal of nanotechnology 2013, 10, 1109–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rattinacannou, J. S. (2014). A promising new energy source: The Brownian motion of nanoresonator arrays. In EPJ Web of conferences (Vol. 79, p. 01006). EDP Sciences.
- Wang, Z. L. Triboelectric nanogenerators as new energy technology for self-powered systems and as active mechanical and chemical sensors. ACS nano 2013, 7, 9533–9557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waniewski, J.; Pietribiasi, M.; Pstras, L. Calculation of the Gibbs–Donnan factors for multi-ion solutions with non-permeating charge on both sides of a permselective membrane. Scientific Reports 2021, 11, 22150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fontenot, R. J.; Lockwood, D. J.; Allison, J. M.; Preston, D. J. A review and outlook on osmotically driven heat pipes for passive thermal transport. Applied Thermal Engineering 2024, 123097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelfattah, I.; El-Shamy, A. M. Review on the escalating imperative of zero liquid discharge (ZLD) technology for sustainable water management and environmental resilience. Journal of Environmental Management 2024, 351, 119614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, Y.; Feng, A.; Mao, S.; Onggowarsito, C.; Zhang, X. S.; Guo, W.; Fu, Q. Hydrogels in solar-driven water and energy production: Recent advances and future perspectives. Chemical Engineering Journal 2024, 152303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).