Submitted:
24 March 2024
Posted:
26 March 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Research Zone



3. Materials and Methods
| Road Network | OpenStreetMap |
|---|---|
| Buildings | Town Planning Office, Google Earth, OpenStreetMap |
| Green Space | Town Planning Office, Google Earth, OpenStreetMap, Local Offices |
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations (UN), 2012. World urbanization prospects the 2011 revision. World Urbanization Prospects, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
- Blanco, H.; Alberti, M.; Forsyth, A.; Krizek, K.J.; Rodriguez, D.A.; Talen, E.; Ellis, C. Hot, congested, crowded and diverse: Emerging research agendas in planning. Progress in Planning 2009, 71, 153–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanesi, G.; Chiarello, F. Residents and urban green spaces: The case of Bari. Urban forestry and Urban Greening 2006, 4, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.; Byrne, J.; Pickering, C. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 2012, 4, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oberndorfer, E.; Lundholm, J.; Bass, B.; Coffman, R.R.; Doshi, H.; Dunnett, N.; Gaffin, S.; Köhler, M.; Liu, K.K.Y.; Rowe, B. Green Roofs as Urban Ecosystems: Ecologiacal Structures, Functions, and Services. BioScience 2007, 57, 823–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, F.E.; Bacaicoa, M.; Sullivan, W.C. Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety and preference. Environment and Behaviour 1998, 30, 28–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheiesura, A. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and urban Planning 2004, 68, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maas, J.; Verheij, R.A.; de Uries, S.; Spreeuwenberg, P.; Schllevis, F.G.; Groenwegen, P.P. Morbidity is related to a green living environment. Joournal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2009, 63, 967–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anon. Surgeon general’s report on physical activity and health. Journal of the American Medical Association 1996, 276, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barton, J.; Pretty, J. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving menthal health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science and Technology 2010, 44, 3947–3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sandström, U.G.; Angelstam, P.; Khakee, A. Urban comprehensive planning – identifying barriers for the maintenance of functional habitat networks. Landscape Urban Planning 2006, 75, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Triguero-Mas, M.; Dadvand, P.; Cirach, M.M.; Martínez, D.; Medina, A.; Mompart, A.; Basagaña, X.; Gražulevıčıenė, R.; Nıeuwenhuıjsen, M.J. Natural outdoor environments and mental and physical health: relationships and mechanisms. Environment International 2015, 77, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kabisch, N.; Strohbach, M.; Haase, D.; Kronenberg, J. Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecological Indicators 2016, 70, 586–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annerstedt van den Bosch, M.; Mudu, P.; Uscila, V.; Barrdahl, M.; Kulinkina, A.; Staatsen, B.; Swart, W.; Kruize, H.; Zurlyte, I.; Egorov, A.I. Development of an urban green space indicator and the public health rationale. Scand J Public Health 2016, 44, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization. ‘Urban Planning, Environment and Health: From Evidence to Policy Action’, 2010 (World Health Organization, ‘Urban Planning, Environment and Health:From Evidence to Policy Action’, 2010, [Online] available at http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/114448/E93987.pdf?
- Herzele, V.; Wiedeman, T. A Monitoring Tool for the Provision for Accessible and Attractive Green Spaces. Elsevier Sciences: Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 63, 109–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vale, D.S.; Saraiva, M.; Pereira, M. Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility. Journal of Transport and Land Use 2015, 9, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Logan, T.M.; Williams, T.G.; Nisbet, A.J.; Liberman, K.D.; Zuo, C.T.; Guikema, S.D. Evaluating urban accessibility: leveraging open-source data and analytics to overcome existing limitations. Urban Analytics and City Science 2017, 46, 897–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macedo, J.; Haddad, M.A. Equitable distribution of open space: Using spatial analysis to evaluate urban parks in Curitiba, Brazil. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2016, 43, 1096–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Rosa, D. Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecological Indicators 2014, 42, 122–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Yue, W.; La Rosa, D. Which communities have better accessibility to green space? An investigation into environment inequality using big data. Landscape and Urban Planning 2020, 204, 13919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SPO Girne Çatalköy İmar Planı Mevcut Durum Rapor 2017.
- Davand.
- Gupta, K.; Roy, A.; Luthra, K.; Mahavir, S.M. GIS based analysis for assessing the accessibility at hierarchical levels of urban green spaces. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2016, 18, 198–211. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, P.; Xu, L.; Yue, W.; Chen, J. Accessibility of public urban green space in an urban periphery: The case of Shanghai. Landscape and Urban Planning 2017, 165, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission, 2001. Towards A Local Sustainability Profile - European Common Indicators Methodology Sheets retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/urban/pdf/local_sustainability_en.pdf.
- Wood, L.; Hooper, P.; Foster, S.; Bull, F. Public green spaces and positive mental health–investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing. Health & Place 2017, 48, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neema, M.N.; Ohgai, A. Multitype green-space modeling for urban planning using GA and GIS. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 2013, 40, 447–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, C.; Hu, L.; Min Li, M. Urban green space accessibility changes in a high-density city: A case study of Macau from 2010 to 2015. Journal of Transport Geography 2018, 66, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, K.; Jeong, K. Assessing the spatial distribution of urban parks using GIS. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 82, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, L.; Halik, Ü.; Abliz, A.; Mamat, Z.; Welp, M. Urban Green Space Accessibility and Distribution Equity in an Arid Oasis City: Urumqi, China. Forests 2020, 11, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H. An environmental justice study on spatial access to parks for youth by using an improved 2SFCA method in Wuhan, China. Cities 2020, 96, 102405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Residential | Neighbor | Quarter Green | District Green | City Green | Urban Forest | City/ Country |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [16] | 150 | 400 | 800 | 1600 | 3200 | 5000 | Flanders, Belgium |
| [24] | 150 | 400 | 800 | - | - | Delhi, India | |
| [25] | 300 | 2000 | 5000 | - | Shangai, Chine | ||
| [26] | 300 | ||||||
| [27] | 400 | 800 | 2000 | Perth, Western Australia | |||
| [28] Neema & Ohgai, 2013 | 160 | 400 | 1600 | 3000 | Dhaka | ||
| [29] | 100 | 500 | 100 | Macau | |||
| [30] Jia, 2001 | 300-400 | 400-800 | 800-5000 | America | |||
| [31] | 250 | 500 | 1000 | Korea | |||
| [32] | 300 | 1000 | 2000 | Urumqi, China |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).