Preprint Article Version 1 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Assessment of Sustainable Mobility Patterns of University Students and Staff: Case of a LMIC

Version 1 : Received: 11 March 2024 / Approved: 11 March 2024 / Online: 11 March 2024 (17:56:59 CET)

How to cite: Fondzenyuy, S.K.; Jackai II, I.N.; Tezong, S.L.F.; Usami, D.S.; Gonzalez-Hernandez, B.; WOUNBA, J.F.; ELAMBO, G.N.; Persia, L. Assessment of Sustainable Mobility Patterns of University Students and Staff: Case of a LMIC. Preprints 2024, 2024030656. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0656.v1 Fondzenyuy, S.K.; Jackai II, I.N.; Tezong, S.L.F.; Usami, D.S.; Gonzalez-Hernandez, B.; WOUNBA, J.F.; ELAMBO, G.N.; Persia, L. Assessment of Sustainable Mobility Patterns of University Students and Staff: Case of a LMIC. Preprints 2024, 2024030656. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202403.0656.v1

Abstract

The transition to sustainable mobility is a recognized socio-economic and environmental challenge, particularly among young adults in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper addresses the lack of comprehensive research on mobility patterns for LMICs by examining the travel patterns of students, staff, and lecturers at the National Advanced School of Public Works, Yaoundé (NASPW) to understand transport mode choices and barriers to the use of public and active transport modes. Data was collected through online questionnaires from 425 participants. Findings revealed that most students (27.5%) used multiple modes of transport, with moto-taxis being the most common (21%). Lecturers primarily used private cars (50%), while staff relied on taxis or multiple modes (33%). Accessibility, vehicle speed, and flexibility appeared as the most important reasons for the preferred modes of transport. Barriers included long waiting times and traffic congestion for public transport, and distance and inadequate infrastructure for active mobility. The usage of public transportation was encouraged by its affordability and reduced travel time, whilst active options were preferred due to their cost savings and health benefits. To promote sustainable mobility for campus travel, it is crucial to encourage active modes, develop mass transport systems, and raise awareness through symposiums and conferences among students and staff.

Keywords

mobility; travel choices; active modes; public transport; low- and middle-income countries

Subject

Engineering, Transportation Science and Technology

Comments (0)

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 0
Metrics 0


×
Alerts
Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.